Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
as y .
The absence of a length scale (the plate is semi-infinite in length) suggests a similarity solution, as
originally used by Blasius. The solution has the form
(5)
y = nxu
.
The scale d is comparable with the boundary layer thickness. This substitution into the equation for y leads to
the following nonlinear ordinary differential equation for f:
(6) f ''' +
1
2
f f
"
= 0 , with f(0) = 0, f
(0) = 0 , and f
1 as h .
This equation is called the Blasius equation. We solve it numerically in the next section. Once f is known, the
velocity components may be computed as
(7) u =
!y
!y
= u
HhL, and v = -
!y
!x
=
1
2
nu
x
8hf
HhL - f HhL< .
2. Solution of the Blasius Equation
A direct attack on the Blasius equation requires some kind of iteration such as a shooting method,
because it is a two-point boundary value problem. Fortunately, there is a reformulation of the problem that
avoids an iteration. We begin this reformulation by introducing a new dependent variable g(h):
(8) g(h) = af(ah) ,
where a is a positive parameter to be determined. As one may show, the equation for g is then the same as that
for f :
(9) g ''' +
1
2
gg
"
= 0 .
From the conditions on f, we have g(0) = 0, g
(0) = 0, and g
(h)= a
2
f
(ah) a
2
as h. Instead of imposing
the condition on g at , we impose g
!
(0) = 1. Then the problem for g is an initial value problem with initial
conditions
(10) g(0) = 0, g
(0) = 0 , g
"
(0) = 1 .
The parameter a does not appear in this formulation, and we can solve for g numerically. After solving for g, we
choose
(11)
a = g
HL ,
Then f will satisfy the proper condition at . With this choice of a, we obtain f as
(12) f(h) =
1
a
g(
h
a
) .
We carry this out now using Mathematica's NDSolve to do the numerical integration.
blasol = NDSolve@8g'''@hD + H1 2L g''@hD g@hD 0,
g@0D 0, g'@0D 0, g''@0D 1<, g, 8h, 0, 15<D;
Mathematica returns an answer in the form of an interpolating function which in most ways can be manipulated
as an ordinary function. We assign this interpolating function to a function we call blag[h]:
blag@h_D = g@hD . First@blasolD;
We check our initial conditions.
blag@0D
0.
blag'@0D
-2.71051 10
-20
2 newblas.nb
blag''@0D
1.
Our numerical integration to get blag was carried out to h = 15. As we see from the plot below, this is more than
we need. The velocity function blag levels off well before h = 10.
Plot@blag
.
graphxcomp = PlotBblaf
">,
ImageSize 360, PlotLabel "Scaled Horizontal Velocity"F
1 2 3 4 5 6
h
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
u
u
x
c
= u
1
2
1
Re
x
c
= 0.8604 (u
/ Re
x
) ,
where Re
x
= Hu
xL n is the Reynolds number based on the distance from the leading edge of the plate. Because
Re
x
is large, we see that the vertical velocity at the edge of the boundary layer is small.
newblas.nb 5
4. Shear Stress on the Plate
The shear stress on the plate is given by
(14)
t = m
!u
!y
y=0
=
m
d
u
f
"
(0) =
rmu
3
x
f
"
(0) .
We get f
!
(0) from the numerical solution:
c0 = blaf''@0D
0.332057
The local coefficient of friction C
f
Idenoted by C
f ,x
in the text) is the local shear stress divided by
1
2
ru
2
, and the average of this over a plate of length L is C
f
. These are given by
(15)
C
f
= 0.664 Re
x
-12
and C
f
= 1.328 Re
L
-12
, where Re
L
=
u
L
n
.
5. Thickness of the Boundary Layer
There is no sharp outer edge of the boundary layer. Rather it merges smoothly and gradually with the
outer free stream. However, there are several rational ways of defining a boundary layer thickness, and we
consider four of them here. The first two methods are based on the same idea -- namely, determining where the
horizontal velocity is nearly equal to the free stream velocity. The first thickness, which we call d
95
, is the y-
value at which the velocity is 0.95 of the free stream velocity. This happens for h = h
95
where
h95 = h . FindRoot@blaf'@hD 0.95, 8h, 3<D
3.91804
Thus d
95
= h
95
d = 3.92 nx u
.
The other two commonly used definitions of boundary layer thickness are more closely tied to the
physics of the flow. The displacement thickness (as discussed in ME 225) is a measure of the mass flux defect
in the boundary layer. It is given by d
d
= h
d
d , where
hd = NIntegrate@1 - blaf'@hD, 8h, 0, 10<D
1.72079
6 newblas.nb
Thus d
d
= h
d
d = 1.72 nx u
.
The last boundary layer thickness is the momentum thickness. As discussed in ME 225, it is a measure of the
momentum flux defect carried by the actual flow. It is given by d
m
= h
m
d, where
hm = NIntegrate@blaf'@hD * H1 - blaf'@hDL, 8h, 0, 10<D
0.664115
Thus d
m
= h
m
d = 0.66 nx u
.
6. Table of Values of the Blasius Function
We construct here a table of values of the Blasius function and its first two derivatives. We do this for h
running from 0 to 8 at intervals of 0.25.
newblas.nb 7
TableForm@Table@8PaddedForm@Chop@0.25 * nD, 84, 2<D,
PaddedForm@Chop@blaf@0.25 * nDD, 88, 4<D,
PaddedForm@Chop@blaf'@0.25 * nDD, 88, 4<D,
PaddedForm@Chop@blaf''@0.25 * nDD, 88, 4<D<,
8n, 0, 32<D, TableHeadings ->
8None, 8" h", " f@hD", " f
@hD", " f
!
@hD"<<D
h f@hD f
@hD f
!
@hD
0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.3321
0.25 0.0104 0.0830 0.3319
0.50 0.0415 0.1659 0.3309
0.75 0.0933 0.2483 0.3282
1.00 0.1656 0.3298 0.3230
1.25 0.2580 0.4096 0.3146
1.50 0.3701 0.4868 0.3026
1.75 0.5011 0.5605 0.2866
2.00 0.6500 0.6298 0.2668
2.25 0.8156 0.6936 0.2434
2.50 0.9963 0.7513 0.2174
2.75 1.1906 0.8022 0.1897
3.00 1.3968 0.8460 0.1614
3.25 1.6131 0.8829 0.1337
3.50 1.8377 0.9130 0.1078
3.75 2.0691 0.9370 0.0844
4.00 2.3057 0.9555 0.0642
4.25 2.5464 0.9694 0.0474
4.50 2.7901 0.9795 0.0340
4.75 3.0360 0.9867 0.0236
5.00 3.2833 0.9915 0.0159
5.25 3.5316 0.9948 0.0104
5.50 3.7806 0.9969 0.0066
5.75 4.0300 0.9982 0.0040
6.00 4.2796 0.9990 0.0024
6.25 4.5294 0.9994 0.0014
6.50 4.7793 0.9997 0.0008
6.75 5.0293 0.9998 0.0004
7.00 5.2792 0.9999 0.0002
7.25 5.5292 1.0000 0.0001
7.50 5.7792 1.0000 0.0001
7.75 6.0292 1.0000 0.0000
8.00 6.2792 1.0000 0.0000
7. The Thermal Boundary Layer
As we showed in class, the similarity solution of Blasius for the velocity in the boundary layer may be
extended to include a calculation of the temperature distribution in the thermal boundary layer. We outline the
calculation here, and use Mathematica to calculate the heat transfer coefficient as a function of Prandtl number
and position along the plate.
8 newblas.nb
As we showed in class, the similarity solution of Blasius for the velocity in the boundary layer may be
extended to include a calculation of the temperature distribution in the thermal boundary layer. We outline the
calculation here, and use Mathematica to calculate the heat transfer coefficient as a function of Prandtl number
and position along the plate.
We start by introducting a dimensionless version q of the temperature T(x,y).
(16) q =
T -T
s
T
- T
s
.
Here T
s
is the surface temperature of the flat plate, and T
-
Pr
2
F HrL
r .
We can evaluate C by using the condition that q should go to 1 as h goes to infinity. This gives
(22)
C =
1
-
Pr
2
F HrL
r .
Substituting the expression for C into (21), we get the answer for q:
(23) q HhL =
0
h
-
Pr
2
F HrL
r
-
Pr
2
F HrL
r
.
While this is a valid expression, it is somewhat inconvenient to work with because it involves iterated numerical
integrations - first to get F from f, and then to get q from F. We can do better. From the Blasius equation (6) we
get
newblas.nb 9
(24) f = -2 f ''' f '' , hence f = -2 ln H f "L ' , so F HrL = -2 ln H f ' ' HrL f ' ' H0LL.
Then
(25) Exp@-HPr 2L F HrLD = H f ' ' HrL f ' ' H0LL
Pr
.
Substituting this into (23) we get
(26) q HhL =
0
h
H f ' ' HrL f ' ' H0LL
Pr
r
n x
dq
dh
H0L.
We finish the calculation of h by using (26) to calculate
dq
dh
H0L. The result is
(28)
dq
dh
H0L =
1