Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
U U
T
T
M
M
(1)
M = Flexural moments at failure in test
M
U
= Theoretical values of ultimate flexural moments
T = Torsional moments at failure in test
T
U
= Theoretical values of ultimate torsional moments
From Figure 5, both CCBF and CCBP curves have illustrated that there is no significant increase
in flexural moment capacity in the presence of torsion. However, there is a significant increase in
torsional moment capacity in the presence of flexure.
3.5 Modified bending-torsion interaction models
Based on the experimental test results, bending-torsion interaction models are suggested for
curved in plan composite steel-concrete beams with full and partial shear connections. The
interaction equations can be written as follows:
For full shear connection,
1 7 . 0 +
=
U U
M
M
T
T
when 1 0 <
U
M
M
and 1
U
T
T
(2)
1 =
U
M
M
when 1
U
M
M
and 7 . 1 0
U
T
T
(3)
For partial shear connection (50%),
1 4 . 0 +
=
U U
M
M
T
T
when 1 0 <
U
M
M
and 1
U
T
T
(4)
1 =
U
M
M
when 1
U
M
M
and 4 . 1 0
U
T
T
(5)
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, curved in plan composite steel-concrete beams with the partial shear connection
were able to achieve similar strengths in term of flexure and torsion compared with the
composite steel-concrete beams with full shear connection.
The ultimate flexural moment capacity of the composite steel-concrete beams decreased with an
increase in the span/radius of curvature ratio and the main failure mode will change from flexure
to combined action of flexure and torsion.
From the bending-torsion interaction diagram, curved in plan composite steel-concrete beams
with full and partial shear connections have illustrated that in the presence of torsion, there is no
significant increase in flexural moment capacity. However, there is an increase in the torsional
moment capacity in the presence of flexure. A simplified model has been presented for each
curved in plan composite steel-concrete beam with full and partial shear connections to illustrate
their bending-torsion interaction.
Australasian Structural Engineering Conference (ASEC), 2008, Melbourne, Australia
ISBN 978 1 877040 70 2
Paper No 090 Page 9
5. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Australian Research Council Discovery Project for
the support of this project. The authors would also like to thank Messrs Bridge, Grant, Rowlan,
Knust and Laird from the University of Wollongong for their assistance during the tests. Lastly,
the author would like to acknowledge Mr Kaewunruen for his support during the tests as well.
6. References
American Institute of Steel Construction. AISC steel construction manual. American Institute of
Steel Construction; 13 ed; 2006.
British Standards Institution, BS 5950-1-2000. Structural use of steelwork in building. Code of
practice for design. Rolled and welded sections. BSI Standards; 2000.
British Standards Institution. Euro-Code 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures,
part 1.1 general rules and rules for buildings, DDENV 1994-1-1. European Committee for
Standardisation (CEN); 1992.
Colville J. Tests of curved steel-concrete composite beams. Journal of the Structural Division,
ASCE 1973;99:1555-1570.
Nie J, Luo L, Hu S. Experimental study on composite steel-concrete beams under combined
bending and torsion. Composite and Hybrid Structures 2000;2:631-638.
Ray MB, Mallick SK. Interaction of flexure and torsion in steel-concrete composite beams. The
Indian Concrete Journal 1980;54:80-83.
Standards Australia. Australian Standard AS 2327.1-2003 Composite structures, Part 1: Simply
supported beams. Standards Australia International Ltd; 2003.
Thevendran V, Chen S, Shanmugam NE, Richard Liew JY. Experimental study on steel-concrete
composite beams curved in plan. Engineering Structures 2000;22:877-889.
Thevendran V, Chen S, Shanmugam NE, Richard Liew JY. Nonlinear analysis of steel-concrete
composite beams curved in plan. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 1999;32:125-139.