0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
12 visualizzazioni8 pagine
Nanofiltration, a recent membrane technique, was used for the softening of very hard water. Results show that this membrane technique is of great interest in the process of eliminating temporary hardness of water, which depends mainly on the applied pressure and the tangential flow rate.
Nanofiltration, a recent membrane technique, was used for the softening of very hard water. Results show that this membrane technique is of great interest in the process of eliminating temporary hardness of water, which depends mainly on the applied pressure and the tangential flow rate.
Nanofiltration, a recent membrane technique, was used for the softening of very hard water. Results show that this membrane technique is of great interest in the process of eliminating temporary hardness of water, which depends mainly on the applied pressure and the tangential flow rate.
DESALINATION www.elsevier.com/locate/desal Us e o f nanofi l trati on for partial sof t eni ng o f very hard water Sa mi r a Ghi z e l l a oui a*, Ai s s a Chi ba ni a, Souhe i l a Ghi z e l l a oui b aD@artement de chimie, bD@artement de chimie Industrielle, Universit~ de Mentouri de Constantine, Route de Ain E1 Bey, 25000 Constantine, Alg&ie TeL~Fax: +213 (31) 61 43 44; email: gsamira@yahoo.eom Received 30 September 2004; accepted 22 November 2004 Abstract Nanofiltration, a recent membrane technique, was used for the softening of very hard water. Our study was based on the elimination of one part of the temporary hardness of Hamma water which provides Constantine City with drinking water. Two techniques were used in order to obtain a partial softening. The first is related to weak pressures (0.5, 1,2 bar) whereas the second is based on relatively high pressures (4-16 bar) and which is applied on feed water. However, we should mention that at the end of this experience, 50% of filtered water was mixed with 50% of hard water. The results show that this membrane technique is of great interest in the process of eliminating temporary hardness of water, which depends mainly on the applied pressure and the tangential flow rate. Keywords: Drinking water; Hardness; Calcium carbonate; Partial softening; Nanofiltration 1. Introducti on Waters f r om Hamma wi t h a hardness of 60 French degrees (600 ppm in CaCO3) must be treated bef or e any use due to the large quantities of cal ci um carbonat e (scaling). Under these con- ditions, the consequences o f t hese deposits are of t hree types: hydraul i c, t hermal and mechani cal . Accor di ng to Khalil et al. [ 1 ], to fi ght against scaling, it is necessar y to use chemi cal or physi cal *Corresponding author. processes. Chemi cal met hods, based on the use of scaling inhibitors such as car boxyl at e or phos- phonat es, are effect i ve but not possi bl e in the case of wat er o f distribution. Several physi cal pro- cesses such as mi cr o- el ect r ol ysi s of water, the generat i on o f el ect romagnet i c waves or the drain- age duct t hr ough per manent magnet s have been gi ven, for exampl e, by Rosset et al. [2], Rosset [3], Maydat chevs ky [4], and Cl eret and L6di on [5]. All of these studies as wel l as others led to a search for good met hods of i nhi bi t i on of the Presented at the conference on Membranes in Drinking and Industrial Water Production, L "Aquila, Italy, 15-17 November 2004. Organized by the European Desalination Society. 0011-9164/05/$- See front matter 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.077 316 S. Ghizellaoui et al. / Desalination 179 (2005) 315-322 f ur r i ng capaci t y o f wat er wh i c h r emai ns appl i - cabl e for dr i nki ng wat er. The us e o f t he nanof i l t r at i on (NF) me mb r a n e t echni que has r ecent l y b e c o me an i mpor t a nt t e c hnol ogy f or separ at i on. It f unc t i ons wi t hout t he addi t i on o f chemi cal s , wi t h a r el at i vel y l ow c ons umpt i on o f ener gy. The me mb r a n e s are us ed mor e of t en f or t he t r e a t me nt o f subsoi l wat er s [6,7], f or wa s t e wa t e r and f i nal l y f or sever al i ndust ri al sect or s (t ext i l es, phar maceut i cal s , chemi cal , etc. ) [8,9]. NF was us ed her e, on one ha nd, t o ens ur e we a k r et ent i on o f mo n o v a l e n t i ons (HCO3, C1-) but good r et ent i on o f t he di va l e nt i ons ( Ca 2, Mg 2+, SO42-); and on t he ot her ha nd, f or t he el i mi nat i on o f par t o f t he t e mpor a r y har dnes s o f Ha mma wat er, wh i c h pr ovi de s t he Ci t y o f Con- st ant i ne wi t h dr i nki ng wat er. We wo r k e d wi t h l ow pr es s ur es (0.5, 1, 2 bar). I n addi t i on, we exer t ed r el at i vel y s t r ong pr es s ur es ( 4 - 1 6 bar) on wat er wh i c h was mi x e d at t he e nd o f t he t r eat ment wi t h 50% ha r d wat er. Table 1 Harnma water analysis Parameter Value Temperature, C 31-33 pH 6.95-7.94 EC, mS/cm 0.9-1.30 TOC, mg/L 3.84-7.5 CO2, mg/L 16.21-37.05 HCO~, mg/L 320-432 el -, mg/L 128-150 SO~-, mg/L 120-212 PO 3-, mg/L 0.006-0.02 NO3, mg/L 3.90-7 NO~, mg/L + NH4, mg/L TH, mg/L CaCO 3 475-600 Ca 2+, mg/L 124-131 Mg 2+, mg/L 30.48-43.2 Na +, mg/L 84-115 K +, mg/L 2.22-13 2. Physi cochemi cai characteri sti cs of Hamma water The anal ysi s gi ve n i n Tabl e 1 s hows t hat Ha mma wat er s have a l ow or gani c ma t t e r c ont e nt ( TOC: 3. 84- 7. 5 mg/ L) , a r at her hi gh sal t c ont e nt (EC: 0. 9- 1. 30 mS/ c m) and an appr eci abl e har d- ness (TH: 4 7 5 - 6 0 0 mg / L CaCO3). 3. Analysis of deposits 3.1. X-ray analysis The depos i t s wer e anal yzed by X- r ay di f f r ac- t i on. The scal e was f o u n d t o cr yst al l i ze i n t he f or m o f a mi xt ur e o f cal ci t e a nd ar agoni t e. 3.2. IR spectrum The I R spect r u, (Fi g. 1) o f t he depos i t i s s ued f r om t he Ha mma wat er pr es ent s at 25 C sever al bands o f abs or pt i ons : 3417. 8 ~ O H o f w a t e r 2514. 7 ~ or gani c i mpur i t i es r el at ed t o usual pol l ut i on ( e qui pme nt , bui l di ngs , oper at or s) 1796. 9 ~ char act er i st i c o f cal ci t e 1429. 9 -~ CO 3 + s houl der , whi c h r epr es ent s a mi xt ur e o f cal ci t e and ar agoni t e 500 and 1000 ~ a l u mi n o si l i cat es, pr obabl y c o mi n g f r om t r aces o f cl ay 875. 9 and 848 ~ char act er i st i c o f cal ci t e 321. 8 ~ char act er i st i c o f cal ci t e 4. Experi ment al 4.1. Apparat us The pi l ot s ys t e m us e d wa s a c omme r c i a l 12 L Mi l l i por e Pr os cal e modul e . Fi g. 2 s hows a sche- mat i c di a gr a m o f t he e xpe r i me nt a l s ys t e m t hat was e qui ppe d wi t h a Na n o ma x 50 c ompos i t e spi ral p o l y a mi d e me mb r a n e . The me mb r a n e S. Ghi zel l aoui et al. / Desal i nati on 179 (2005) 315-322 317 2 , 4 0 2 . 2 _ 2 . 0 1 . 8 . . 1 , 6 .... 1 . 4 : L 2 J 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 4 2 5 1 4 . 7 i796.9 0.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / 0 . 0 4 i ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 0 0 0 . 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 4 Y , $ . 6 ' i I i i / ~ 7 5 . 9 J [ 7 1 _ ' : 1 . 7 ? 6 n . o :i 3 2 ] . 8 i i e ' l l 6 I . Q " , , ..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............................................................................................. 7 ........................................................................................... 1 5 0 0 1090 500 c m - I 200.0 Fig. 1. IR spectrum o f the deposit obtained at 25C. 4 7 8 c>r< j I Fig. 2. Schematic diagram o f the nanofiltration pilot. 1 tank, 2 feed pump, 3 and 4 pressure regulation, valves, 5 nanofiltra- tion module, 6 permeate recirculation, 7 retentate recirculation, 8 heat exchanger. D, f l ow meter; P, pressure sensor; T, temperature sensor. MWCO wa s 3 5 0 Da l t o n and t he f i l t er s urf ace area wa s 0. 37 m 2. Al l t he e x pe r i me nt s we r e carri ed out at a c ons t ant f e e d c o mp o s i t i o n by r e c y c l i n g bot h t he ret ent at e and t he pe r me at e t o t he f e e d tank. 318 S. Ghizellaoui et al. / Desalination 179 (2005) 315-322 4.2. Procedure A 4-L vol ume of Hamma raw water was used in every NF test. Samples of the retentate and the permeate were taken for analysis after 60 min of filtration. Following each experiment, the mem- brane was washed with a solution of hydrochloric acid at a pH 2 and then rinsed with distilled water until a conductivity of about 1 #S/ cm of the flushing water was reached. 4.3. Analytical determinations Determination of the anions (Cl-, SO~-) was carried out by chromatographic analysis (Waters 501) at a flow rate of 1.3 mL/ mi n using a con- ductimetric detector (Waters 431) and an anion column (Shodex 1-524A). One liter ofel uant con- tained 0.207 g of para-hydroxybenzoic acid, 5 mL of methanol and sufficient ethanolamine to adjust the solution pH to 8. The bicarbonates were analyzed with a Dohr- mann-Xertex DC80 apparatus. The concentration of the cations (Ca 2+, Mg 2+) was determined by atomic absorption using a Varian 1275 apparatus with an air-acetylene flame. 5. Results The NF treated part at low pressures has been recently presented [10] and is used here only for an eventual comparison with the behavior of NF at high pressure. 5.1. Influence of low transmembrane pressure on the retention of the ions Runs were carried out at operating pressures of 0.5, 1 and 2 bar. These pressures are suitable for achieving partial softening, leaving sufficient minerals in the drinking water. Water temperature was maintained at 20C t hroughout the run. Table 2 summarizes mi ni mum and maxi mum values of all chemical species analyzed in the Table 2 Composition of feed and permeate water F e e d Pe r me a t e Retention water (%) Conductivity 1010-1032 725-813 18-26 (#S/cm at 20C) CI-, mg/L 129-130 121- 126 0.75-2 SO 2-, mg/L 1 3 1 - 1 3 2 7.9-9.2 93-94 HCO3, mg/L 408-466 298- 365 10-30 Ca >, mg/L 1 2 0 - 1 2 5 78-89 24-34 Mg 2, mg/L 36-37 22-27 23-40 pH 7.30-7.58 7.72-8.19 - - feed, retentate and permeate respectively after 60 min of filtration Figs. 3 and 4 show the effect of pressure on retention of the Ca > and Mg 2+ cations and of the HCO; , C1- and SO4 > anions. The retention of both cations and anions increases with the applied pressure. The retention of Ca > ions was found to be lower than that of Mg >. This may be explained by the smaller ionic radius of Mg >, the value of which ranges from 0.74A. to 1.04/~. The higher solvation energy of Mg 2+ ions acts to augment their retention. In the case of anions, retention of the sulfate ion was very high, but total elimination (100%) was not obtained because of the relatively high sulfate concentration in the water. Bicarbonate ions were better retained than chloride ions. 5.2. Influence transmembrane pressure on f l ow The tests were carried out by maintaining the rate of feed constant, temperature at 20C and by varying the pressure from 4 to 16 bar. The evolution of flow according to the transmembrane pressure (TMP) is given in Fig. 5. It should be noted that when the pressure increases, variation is observed between the line relating to pure water and that corresponding to Hamma water. This variation is due to the accumulation of the S. Ghizellaoui et al. / Desalination 179 (2005) 315-322 319 30 ~ 2 0 O 'Z= e- ca ~ 10 Ca 2~ --o-- Mg 2~ - . . . . . . j l , 0 0 . 4 o ; s 1 .'2 P (bar) Fig. 3. Percent retention of cations. i 116 2.0 110 O c a 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.4 A - - -A- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . ....... o.. CI- -i -- HCO~ .... .. SO~" 018 1.2 ' 1.'6 P (bar) Fig. 4. Percent retention of anions. 210 ions on the membrane at the origin o f concen- tration polarization. Thi s gradient o f concentra- tion i nvol ves additional resistance through the membrane, whi ch is in addition due to the osmotic pressure. Th i s o b s e r v a t i o n wa s a l s o ma d e b y Xu a n d Spencer [ 11 ] and Boucar d in Paugam [ 12]. Whi l e wor ki ng wi t h concent r at ed salts, t hese aut hors not ed a st rong di f f er ence bet ween the sl ope of t he ri ght -hand si de o f f l ow t o wat er and t hat o f the f l ow of per meat e due to the phenomenon o f mai nt ai ni ng concent r at i on pol ari zat i on. 5.3. Influence a high transmembrane pressure on the retention of the ions Part o f the wat er was sof t ened by exert i ng pressures r angi ng bet ween 4 and 16 bar and by 4O 1 30 2 5 20 Pure water Hamma water 15- i0- 5 2 0 ' , , , , 0 y t l i 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 P (bar) 20 Fig. 5. Solvent flow and Hamma flow as a function of pressure. Table 3 Composition of feed and permeate water Feed Permeate Retention water (%) Conductivity 998-1033 572-905 39.35-47.05 ( #S/ c at 20C) CI-, mg/L 120-125 80-100 12.5-17.8 SO42-, mg/L 116-158 1.30-10 98.0-98.6 HCO3-, mg/L 414-475 238-247 32.00-39.77 Ca >, mg/L 128-132 54-65 45.30-49.45 Mg 2, mg/L 36-39 12.5-13.2 55.77-63.40 pH 7.14-7.72 7.61-8.38 - - Table 4 Composition of mixed water Mixture pH 7.16-8.07 Conductivity, #S/cm at 20C 799-828 CF, mg/L 105-110 SO4 z-, mg/L 66.66-91.20 HCO~, mg/L 342-385 Ca >, mg/L 89-I00 Mg >, mg/L 23.4-25.0 320 S. Ghizellaoui et al. / Desalination 179 (2005) 315-322 43 42 41 40 39 = 38 @ = 3 7 3 6 : . , . a 35 34 33 32 31 HCO 3 aj g t4 l b ' 1 2 '1 5 18 P ( bar ) Fig. 6. Percent retention of HCO 3, 50 --- 49 = 48 0 o = 47 46 45 Fig. 7. Ca 2+ 6 8 1'0 1'2 " 14 P (bar) Percent retention of Ca 2+. 1'6 18 65 64 63 =~ 62 61 "= 60 = 59 58 57 56 55 Mg 2+ P (bar) Fig. 8. Percent retention of Mg 2. ma i nt a i ni ng t he s a me t e mpe r a t ur e us e d bef or e 20C. It is i mpor t a nt t o not e t hat at t he end o f fi l t rat i on t he s of t ened wat er was mi x e d wi t h 50% r aw wat er. Al l r esul t s are r e por t e d i n Tabl es 3 and 4. It s houl d be n o t e d t hat dur i ng t he fi l t rat i on o f t he Ha mma wat er (Fi gs. 6 - 8 ) b y t he me mbr a ne , t he r et ent i on o f t he i ons i ncr eas ed wi t h pr essur e, t he n e vol ve d sl i ght l y, and t he n st abi l i zed in t he shape o f a pl at eau. Th e s a me obs er vat i on was ma de by Ra na t a ms kul [13]. The i ncr ease i n r et ent i on can be expl ai ned as i ndi cat ed by Me hi gu~ne [14] by t he i ncr ease i n t he s ol vent f l ow, and as t he t r ans f er o f sol ut e does not i ncr ease wel l as s ol ve nt does, t he sol ut e is di vi de d i nt o a v o l u me o f mo r e s i gni f i cant sol vent . The pe r me a t e wi l l be c onc e nt r a t e d l ess and t he rat e o f r et ent i on wi l l be mo r e si gni f i cant . Anot he r expl anat i on can al so be gi ven: u n d e r t he ef f ect o f pr essur e, t her e is a pr ogr e s s i ve a c c umul a t i on o f i ons on t he sur f ace o f t he me mb r a n e i nvol vi ng concent r at i on pol ar i zat i on, wh i c h t her ef or e estab- l i shes a gr adi ent o f c onc e nt r a t i on be t we e n t he sur f ace me mb r a n e and t he f eed sol ut i on. Thi s di f f er ence i n c onc e nt r a t i on i nduc e s a di f f usi onal f l ow i n t he oppos i t e di r ect i on o f c onve c t i ve f l ow i nvol vi ng a r e duc t i on i n t r ansf er o f t he i ons t o t he l evel o f t he me mb r a n e and t hus mo r e si gni f i cant r et ent i on. It is not i c e d t hat f or l ow pr es s ur es (Fig. 9) t he rat e o f r et ent i on o f c hl or i de s is weak, but it i ncr eases r e g u l a r l y - - a l t h o u g h s l i g h t l y - - wi t h t he i ncr ease in pr es s ur e. In cont r ast , t he sul phat es s h o we d t he hi ghe s t r at e o f r et ent i on, whi c h is i nde pe nde nt o f TMP (Fi g. 10) . These i ons, ha vi ng t he s ame negat i ve char ge as t he me mbr a ne , are p u s h e d ba c k b y t hi s me mb r a n e . Ther ef or e, t her e wi l l is an a c c umul a t i on o f ne ga t i ve char ges cl ose t o t he me mbr a ne . For l ow pr es s ur es , t he mo n o v a l e n t Co- i ons (C1-) cr oss t he me mb r a n e mo r e easi l y. The r et ent i on o f bi car bonat es i ncr eas es sl i ght l y wi t h t he i ncr ease o f pr es s ur e, but t he y are r et ai ned bet t er t han chl or i des due t o t he st eri c ef f ect whi c h S. Ghizellaoui et al. / Desalination 179 (2005) 315-322 321 18 17 ",--16 ~ 15 ,t,,,a CO 14 13 12 1() 1'2 P (bar) Fig. 9. Percent retention of C1-. C I " ' 1 4 ' 1 6 18 70- 65 ~ ,-, 6O; S v = 5 5 . 50- 45 ~ c~ 4O ~ 35 ~ Ca 2' 3C 260 ' 2:20 '240" 260 ' 280' 300 '3:20 ' 340 ' 360 v (I/h) Fig. 11. Percent retention of Ca > as a function of the rate of tangential flow. 99 98 e- . @ ~, 97 9 6 4 6 B 10 P ( b a r ) Fig. 10. Percent tetention of SO~-. 1 '2 ~ 8 S 0 4 "2 i 114 16 carries it. Moreover, their concentration being raised, their retention remai ns weak (Fig. 6). 5.4. Influence rate o f t angent i al f l o w on the retention Retention increases si mul t aneousl y with the rate of circulation. Thus the increase of the tan- gential flow rate mi ght be linked to a decrease of circulation. Consequent l y, this coul d generat e the increase of the retention. We not ed that the increase speed led to a slight increase in the rate of retention of divalent ions (Ca >, Mg >, SO42-) and HCO~. Figs. 11-14 75 7O = 65 o " ~ 60- ~ D 55" Mg 2~ 50 200 ' 220' 2,~0' 260' 280' 300' 30' 340' 360 V0Aa) Fig. 12. Percent retention of Mg 2+ as a function of the rate of tangential flow. show that at a fi xed pressure the drive of divalent to a hi gher speed towards the retentate is more significant compared to t he membrane. The influ- ence of the sweepi ng forces towards the permeat e is smaller, and the forces on the surface are more effective in this case. In contrast, i f the rate of tangential flow is low, the quantity of the ions on the level of the membrane is high (quantity of solute in the pores is high). I f the sweepi ng forces towards the permeat e become stronger than the forces of surface, there will be a decrease of retention of ions such as Ca >, Mg 2+, SO 2- and HCO 3. 322 S. Ghizellaoui et al. / Desalination 179 (2005) 315-322 98.4- 98.2 .~" 98.1 ~=9s.0 97. 9 97. 8 97.7. s 0 } - 97.6 260'20 '2~i0 '2do 2~0 '360 '3:}0 '34~0 '360 V ( l / h) Fig. 13. Percent retention of SO~- as a function of the rate of tangential flow. 50- ~, 45-
= 4@ Q 35- 30- 25- HCO 3" 260 ' 220 '240 '260 '28'0 '300 '320 '34'0 '360 v (l / h) Fig. 14. Percent retention of HCO{ as a function of the rate of tangential flow. 6. Co n c l u s i o n s The principal objective of this work was to study the process of water softening, which is necessary for the protection of the distribution network of drinking waters and industrial facili- ties against scaling. With this intention, two techniques on the laboratory scale were tested with NF. The first study used low pressures (0.5, 1 and 2 bar), and the second one used relatively strong pressures (4-16 bar) on raw water. There- after, the latter (50%) was mixed with filtered water (50%). The results reveal that the last process produced partially softened water of good quality containing minerals which are necessary for its consumption. Moreover, the interest of NF for the elimination of temporary hardness was con- firmed. Rates of retention reached 50% for Ca 2+ and 40% for HCO3 at relatively strong pressures and 34% for Ca 2+ and 30% for HCO3 at low pressures. These rates of retention mainly depend on the tangential flow rate. However, in the case of pressure, we noted a certain evolution at the beginning which is then stabilized in the shape of a plate due to the concentration polarization phenomenon. Re f e r e n c e s [1] A. Khalil, P. Sassiat, C. Colin, C. Meignen, C. Gamier, C. Gabrielli, M. Keddam and R. Rosset, TSM, 1992, pp. 259-263. [2] R. Rosset, D. Mercier and S. Douville, Ann. Fais, Exp. Chim., 90(938) (1997) 41-65. [3] R. Rosset, L'actualit4 chimique, (1992) 125-148. [4] G. Maydatchevsky, TSM, 6 (1995) 1-29. [5] D. Cleret and J. L6dion, TSM, 2 (1998) 55-67. [6] A. Khalil and V.S. Praptowidodo, Desalination, 132 (2000) 287-292. [7] C.A.C. Van de Lisdonk, J.A.M. Van Paassen and J.C. Schippers, Desalination, 132 (2000) 101-108. [8] Y. Garba, S. Taha, N. Gondrexon, J. Gabon and G. Dorange, J. Membr. Sci., 168 (2000) 135-141. [9] K. Mehiguene, Y. Garba, S. Taha, N. Gondrexon and G. Dorange, Sep. Pur. Technol., 15 (1999) 181-187. [10] S. Ghizellaoui, S. Taha, G. Dorange, A. Chibani and J. Gabon, Desalination, 7 (2004) 133-138. [11] X. Xu and H.G. Spencer, Desalination, 113 (1997) 85-93. [12] L. Paugam, Th6se de I'ENSC, Rennes, 2002. [13] C. Ranatamskul, T. Urase and K. Yamamoto, Water Sci. Technol., 38(4-5) (1998) 453-462. [14] K. Mehigu6ne, Th6se de I'ENSC, Rennes, 1999.