Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
http://magneticuniverse.com/discussion/55/crystal-batteries/p1#axzz3!p"hne
! started #ondering $%o# #ould one ma&e the initial charge "or the '(% #ithout a generator or a
manu"actured car battery)$ *his led me to cement+ earth+ #ater/salt#ater batteries and "inally+ crystal
batteries. *he main reason these have caught my attention is because their li"espan seems to be o""
the records ,some have claimed to run -./s "or 01 years and motors "or 2 months be"ore 3ust
shutting them do#n4. 5thers have had 2 motors at a time running o"" earth batteries+ so it ma&es you
#onder #hat is possible #hen connecting a ton o" these in series ,"or more voltage4 or in parallel
,"or more amperage4.
6rystal batteries are basically any &ind o" crystal ,7alt+ sugar+ alum+ borax+ etc4 gro#n around 0
disimilar metals used "or 0 electrodes to produce current ,"rom my research and experiments+
aluminum is good enough "or - and copper is best "or 14. !8m not so sure about salt+ as it might
corrode metals+ but #hat !8m basically tal&ing about are alum/borax type crystals.
*he corrosion o" the metals seems to be nonexistent+ as opposed to #ater batteries or salt#ater
batteries+ and there are debates over #hether this is the common galvanic reaction "ound in most
batteries. *here are also a "e# researchers #ho have used gel-li&e substance #ith metals and noticed
the corrosion too& a much slo#er rate. *his might mean that the structure o" a crystal has the same
e""ect as #ater batteries but #ithout the corrosion.
!8m not sure i" many people are "amiliar #ith them+ so !8ll explain brie"ly some &ey points:
9ohn Bedini and 9ohn %utchison has #or&ed on them ,they are also called $%utchison cells$4 more
than anyone else+ ! thin&.
*here are a "e# youtube channelers #ho are really doing some amazing #or& ,lidmotor+ ibpointless
and lasersaber stand out4.
6hec& these out:
-iteral 6rystal Battery :unning a 'ulse (otor
https://###.youtube.com/#atch)"eature;player<embedded=v;t>o-p&?i&@
'olycrystalline -iteral 6rystal Battery
https://###.youtube.com/#atch)"eature;player<embedded=v;A>B6>'1%:Cg
,notice the voltage goes "rom C.55> - C.51> then bac& up and do#n again+ then later on it goes "rom
C.5 to C.5D then bet#een those ratios4
*he %utchison 6ell
https://###.youtube.com/#atch)v;3x"<9Bn/5B#="eature;player<embedded
,!gnore him dancing in drag Bueen out"it and pay attention #hen he says $this is the solution to the
energy crisis+ in my opinion$. (aybe he8s right)4
10> .arth Battery
https://###.youtube.com/#atch)v;eztc7EFp"9g="eature;player<embedded
6rystal 6ell :unning (agnet (otor 01 #ee&s ,be"ore he too& it do#n4
https://###.youtube.com/#atch)v;a#(c50!oCdG="eature;player<embedded
.arth Battery :uns 7ix (otors 6ontinuously
https://###.youtube.com/#atch)"eature;player<embedded=v;HIcFaJF!/@
Jro#ing Klum crystals is "airly easy:
https://###.youtube.com/#atch)"eature;player<embedded=v;sd@7-39L5'#
Eild stu"".
*han&s "or this. ! am researching the basis o" our current electrical theory and this "its right in place.
Ee call them crystals+ the ancients called them stones. $.ven the stones #ill cry out$ is a "amous
saying+ and reveals the #eird experiences people had around stones.
?rom stones #e get so much but "undamentally #e get magnetism and electricity. .lectricity "rom
stones #as not though important "or millennia+ but magnetism had an immediate use "or direction or
orientation "inding at sea etc. !t #as literally a stone called lodestone that #as used+ a crystal
direction "inder.
(etal+ extracted "rom stone or roc& seemed to exhibit this property in certain circumstances but it
#as not presented to the Eest until Jilbert. Ehat the ancient Klchemists and metallurgists &ne# and
too& "or granted #as demonized by the religious establishment in the #est+ and the monarchies that
"eared their treasuries #ould be made #orthless by $devilry$.
6onseBuently elctricity and magnetism #ere separated by centuries in terms o" scienti"ic enBuiry+
and the lin& bet#een them #as bro&en+ .lectra + that is amber #as pic&ed instead o" -ithos+ crystal
or stone. *he connection bet#een the t#o is clear but unbalanced. *he invention o" the electron
sealed the "ate o" magnetic theory.
!t seems "unny that .d should inspire such a movement bac& to the origins o" this &no#ledge and i
thin& -ithos or crystal should be the basic notion. -ithic or lithicity is clearly an e""ect that has "orce
that attracts and repels+ and produces spar&s. /o #e need to use the electron concept or the
magnetron concept to explain it) *he plasma concept seems to be gro#ing in "avour and as a
substance concept ti meets #ith .d8s theoretical construct o" a substance that is the north and south
individual magnets behaviourally.
Jround crystals i" ground "ine enough #ill become a plasma. !t #ill also be $"luid$+ that is able to
"lo# #hether as a solid liBuid or gas+ viscous or other#ise. http://medical-
dictionary.the"reedictionary.com/magnetic1"ield1therapy
Kn iron curtain divides the sub3ects o" gravity and electrodynamics+ in todayMs academically
accepted versions o" physics. *hose attempting to cross it #ill ris& the intellectual eBuivalent o"
machine-gun "ire. Beyond+ lie even more serious obstacles #hich come+ not "rom outside+ but "rom
#ithin the mind o" the investigator. *o get at the source o" those sel"-imposed shac&les+ reBuires that
#e go beyond the bounds o" #hat is today de"ined as Nphysics+O into matters usually classi"ied as
philosophical+ or metaphysical. !n doing so+ #e cannot avoid noticing that there are t#o schools in
physical science+ each one so distinct "rom "rom the other as to constitute t#o entirely di""erent
domains. !t is the un"ortunate aspect o" our modern legacy that most+ even among #ell-educated
scientists+ are una#are even o" the existence o" such a distinction. @et+ i" the real history o" physics
o" the 1Ith century #ere &no#n+ most o" #hat passes as teaching o" "undamental topics in that
discipline today+ #ould be sho#n to be+ in the best o" cases+ misdirected+ in the #orst+ #ill"ul "raud.
Ee &no# o" no better #ay to correct this de"icit than to present this revie# o" the conceptual history
o" 1Ith 6entury electrodynamics. Ee have t#o purposes. ?irst+ to provide the reader #ith an
introduction to the mostly un&no#n electrodynamic theory o" KndrP-(arie KmpQre+ and his
successorsRthis+ as a necessary aid to understanding our "eature article on the sub3ect o" anti-gravity
by the distinguished ?rench research scientist+ /r. :Pmi 7aumont. 7econd+ by exposing a crucial
aspect o" the suppressed history o" gravity+ electricity+ and magnetism+ to address the deeper problem
o" method holding bac& science today.
*he heart o" the matter be"ore us+ begins #ith the hypothesis and experimental validation o" the
KmpQre angular "orce. Be"ore the discovery by 5ersted and KmpQre o" the e""ective eBuivalence o" a
closed current and a magnet+ it appeared that the pair#ise "orces bet#een bodies #ere governed by
the same la# o" universal gravitation+ #hich 9ohannes Sepler had "irst noted in his 12CI New
Astronomy.
1
Kt the time in Buestion+ 1L1I-1L01+ three &no#n phenomena appeared to behave
according to the assumption that the "orce bet#een t#o bodies #as determined according to the
inverse sBuare o" their distance o" separation. Kpart "rom gravitation+ these #ere the phenomena o"
electrostatic, and magnetic attraction and repulsion+ investigated especially by 6oulomb and
'oisson.
!n all three cases+ there #as some Buestion as to the per"ect validity o" the inverse-sBuare
assumption. !n the case o" magnetism+ the impossibility o" separating the t#o opposite poles+ made
exact measurement o" the pair#ise relationship o" one magnet to another al#ays inexact. *his
problem o" the existence o" a Nthird bodyO did not entirely go a#ay+ even in the case o" the most
care"ully observed o" these phenomena+ gravitation.
The Ampre Angular Force
!n 1L02+ KndrP-(arie KmpQre published a groundbrea&ing study+ summarizing the #or& o" "ive
years o" research into the la#s o" the ne# science that he had named electrodynamics. *he results
sho#ed+ that in the case o" the pair#ise interaction o" t#o in"initesimally small elements o" direct
current electricity #ithin conductors+ the "orce bet#een the elements #as not simply dependent on
the inverse sBuare o" their distance o" separation+ but also depended on the angles #hich these
in"initesimal+ directional elements made #ith the line connecting their centers+ and #ith each other.
,!ncluded among the e""ects o" the angular "orce #as the result that successive elements o" current
#ithin the same conductor #ould tend to repel one anotherRthe longitudinal "orce.4
0
KmpQreMs discovery did not escape the attention o" 6arl ?riedrich Jauss at JTttingen University+ the
"oremost mathematical physicist o" the age. Eithin t#o years o" the publication o" KmpQreMs results+
Jauss turned his attention to the matter o" "irmly establishing their validity. %is program+ #hich #as
not to reach complete "ruition until 1L2+ reBuired+ "irst+ the establishment o" an absolute measure
"or the "orce o" the horizontal intensity o" the .arthMs magnetism ,a measure o" the deviation o"t he
compass needle "rom true Aorth4. Up to that time+ all measure o" the strength o" the .arthMs
magnetism #as relative+ determined by counting the "reBuency o" vibration o" a particular magnetic
needle. Jauss+ a master"ul experimentalist as #ell as the leading mathematician o" the age+
determined to apply the precision techniBues o" astronomical measurement to the tas&. *he result
#as the instrument &no#n as the magnetometer. !n his paper o" 1L30+ Jauss created a revolution in
geophysics+ sho#ing ho# to determine the .arthMs magnetic "orce at any given location and time.
3
5ne methodological aspect o" the paper on magnetism proved de"ining "or physics to this day. Ks
also "or his later #or& #ith Eilhelm Eeber+ in connection #ith electrical measurement+ Jauss
determined that the measure o" magnetic "orce must be consistent #ith the units o" measure o" mass,
length, and time, already in use in other branches o" physics. 5#ing to the philosophical and
historical illiteracy o" most contemporary physics teaching+ ho#ever+ JaussMs intention is nearly
al#ays misconstrued+ to assume that these units are meant to be sel"-evident scalar Buantities.
:ather+ as a "amiliarity #ith JaussMs immediately preceding #or& on the sub3ect o" curvature #ould
sho# ,and+ as #as made per"ectly explicit in the "amous 1L5 Habilitation thesis o" his leading
student+ Bernhard :iemann+