0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
4K visualizzazioni3 pagine
An Electoral Commission could settle arguments over whether election candidates’ are eligible to take their seats in Parliament, a civil liberties group said last night.
And the Centre for Justice pledged to draw up a list of proposals to restructure the election process by the end of the year.
An Electoral Commission could settle arguments over whether election candidates’ are eligible to take their seats in Parliament, a civil liberties group said last night.
And the Centre for Justice pledged to draw up a list of proposals to restructure the election process by the end of the year.
An Electoral Commission could settle arguments over whether election candidates’ are eligible to take their seats in Parliament, a civil liberties group said last night.
And the Centre for Justice pledged to draw up a list of proposals to restructure the election process by the end of the year.
Report of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Elections In February 2014, Centre for Justice provided the Parliamentary Select Committee on Elections (the Committee) with a legal analysis on the obligations of candidates in Parliamentary Elections to make disclosures of contracts that they may have with the Government of Bermuda. The law relating to candidates disclosure is contained in section 30(6) of the Bermuda Constitution Order (the Constitution), as supplemented by the Legislature (Qualification and Disqualification) Act 1968 (the 1968 Act). As a non-partisan organization, we agreed to provide this legal analysis because: (a) the request was made by a bi-partisan committee, (b) it involved a question of general public importance, and (c) it is part of our remit to raise public awareness on constitutional issues and the rule of law in general. After seeking independent legal advice from James Goudie QC, a preeminent expert on public law, we came to the conclusion that: (1) The Constitution makes it very clear that there must be a disclosure of an interest in any Government contract. This is subject to the exemptions and limitations contained in the Act, which should be interpreted narrowly so as to detract to the minimum extent possibly from the dominant requirement. Justification for any lack of transparency must be clearly demonstrated. (2) The legal obligation for a candidate to declare an interest in a Government contract is that he or she must do so under the Constitution unless they come clearly within one of the exceptions in Section 10 of the 1968 Act. (3) When disclosure is required it is mandatory. The sanction of disqualification for non- disclosure is automatic. The obligation does not apply only if the situation comes four square within one or more of the exemptions or limitations within the 1968 Act. (4) There is no distinction between political insiders and outsiders as no such distinction is made by the Constitution or the 1968 Act. The law does not refine what a Members interests are, just the circumstances in which an interest must be disclosed. To that end, there is no obscurity in these legal obligations, and no qualification to the duty of disclosure is made by reference to the concept of outsiders. 2
Centre for Justice would make the following recommendations in respect of the above issues: (1) The 1968 Act should be amended to remove any ambiguity.
(2) The amendments should include enforcement provisions, in particular, by whom and how the requirements are to be policed and enforced.
At present the only way to sanction a Parliamentary candidate for breach of an obligation such as the requirement for disclosure is to file an election petition with the Supreme Court under the Legislature (Appointment, Election and Membership Controversies) Act 1968. Such petitions must be filed within 28 days of the return of the writ of election.
Unfortunately, such proceedings are cumbersome and costly. They are also not pro-active as they can only be issued after a candidate is elected a Member of Parliament. In addition, this Act also requires the petition to be served on the Attorney General. This could raise questions of fairness where the Attorney General is a political appointment under the Constitution.
Enforcement of requirements pertaining to electoral candidates, including the obligation to disclose an interest in a government contract, could be by way of an independent, non- partisan Electoral Commission. We would expect the Commission to be given a wide range of powers to receive complaints, inquire as appropriate and sanction offending parties.
Centre for Justice will be looking at the issue of electoral reform in general in the coming months, and hope to have its proposals published by the end of the year.
(3) The requirement that parliamentary candidates should disclose any interest in government contract should be prominently placed on the nomination papers candidates must submit to take part in an electoral campaign.
Managing Director, Venous Memari said Our analysis of the law was based solely on the question of what obligations of disclosure political candidates have under the Constitution and the Legislature (Qualification and Disqualification) Act 1968. We did not consider any specific cases, nor do we intend to take a position on whether any individual parliamentarian is in breach of the Act - that is not our role. For the sake of completeness, that question would have to be determined in a court of law based on the evidence presented to it.
3
A first for Bermuda, Centre for Justice was established in 2011 as an independent, non-governmental organization with a mandate to promote and advocate for human rights, civil liberties and the rule of law through independent research and analysis. Centre for Justice has already sparked discussion through public meetings, newspaper columns and a television round table on the topics of Police Stop and Search Powers, Your Right to Know, Human Rights and Sexual Orientation, and The Economy and the Link to Human Rights and Social Justice. Website: www.justice.bm Email Address: info@justice.bm Telephone: 1-441-542-8181 Fax: 1-441-542-8787 Address: The Armoury Building, Second Floor 37 Reid Street, Hamilton HM12 Bermuda
Be sure to like us on Facebook by searching for Centre for Justice (or by clicking here for electronic versions of this publication).
The State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas, Keith R. Henley, Chairman, Rich Kowalewski, Commissioner, and Margalee Wright, Commissioner, as Constituent Members v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Greyhound Lines, Inc., Intervenor, 933 F.2d 827, 10th Cir. (1991)