Sei sulla pagina 1di 105

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Analysis and Simulation of a Three


Phase Shunt Active Power Filter with
PQ Theory Control Technique

By

Matthew Jonathan Lee

(12623114)

A thesis submitted for the degree of

Bachelor of Engineering in Electrical Engineering


DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING

TITLE: Analysis and simulation of a three-phase shunt active power filter with PQ theory control
technique

AUTHOR: LEE, Matthew Jonathan

FAMILY NAME: Lee

GIVEN NAME: Matthew

DATE 3rd November 2006 SUPERVISOR Dr. Mohammad A.S Masoum

DEGREE Bachelor of Engineering OPTION Electrical Engineering

ABSTRACT

This project investigates the analysis and simulation of a shunt active power filter. The shunt active
power filter provides current harmonic compensation for a nonlinear load on a single bus network.
Current harmonic compensation is achieved by implementation of a PQ theory controller, which
monitors the load current and injects equal amplitude and opposite phase compensation currents to
neutralise load current harmonics. This ensures the source current remains fundamental. The project
simulated results showed that a shunt active power filter is suited for use in current harmonic
compensation on any bus on a power system network.

INDEXING TERMS Active Filter, PQ theory

GOOD AVERAGE POOR

TECHNICAL REPORT

REPORT

EXAMINER CO-EXAMINER
Synopsis

This project investigates the analysis and simulation of a shunt active power filter.

The shunt active power filter provides current harmonic compensation for a

nonlinear load on a single bus network. Current harmonic compensation is achieved

by implementation of a PQ theory controller, which monitors the load current and

injects equal amplitude and opposite phase compensation currents to neutralise load

current harmonics. This ensures the source current remains fundamental. The project

simulated results showed that a shunt active power filter is suited for use in current

harmonic compensation on any bus on a power system network.


3rd November 2006

Matthew Lee
7 Scott Road
WANNEROO WA 6065

Professor Syed Islam


Head of Department
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Curtin University of Technology
Kent St
BENTLEY WA 6102

Dear Professor Syed Islam,

I, Matthew Lee, hereby submit this thesis entitled “Analysis and Simulation of a
Three Phase Shunt Active filter using PQ Theory Control Technique” as partial
fulfillment for the degree of Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical Engineering).

This thesis is entirely my own work outside of where acknowledgement is given.

Yours sincerely,

Matthew Lee
12623114
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge and thank Dr Mohammad A.S Masoum for his role as

project supervisor. Dr Masoum provided much guidance, assistance and technical

information throughout this project. Though the project did not always go to plan, Dr

Masoum was always able to suggest alternative methods for various parts of the

project, and contributed greatly to the success of both the thesis and project

presentation.

I would also like to acknowledge Mr Rob Thornton of EnergySafety for his countless

hours spent providing technical information and suggestions for improvement

throughout this project.

I would also like to acknowledge Mr. Douglas Bonsu for giving up many of his

evenings to ensure a working simulation.

I would also like to acknowledge Miss Miriam Hamilton for her many hours spent

formatting my thesis and ensuring it met the strict guidelines.

i
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements................................................................................................................................ i

Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. ii

List of Figures...................................................................................................................................... vi

List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................... ix

CHAPTER 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 The need for harmonic compensation.......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Objective and aims ...................................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Overview of project ..................................................................................................................................... 3

CHAPTER 2 ......................................................................................................................................... 5

2.0 THEORY OF HARMONICS FILTERS...................................................................................... 5


2.1 What are harmonic filters?.......................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Types of harmonic filters involved in harmonic compensation ................................................................... 5
2.3 Classification of harmonic filters by system configuration ......................................................................... 7
2.4 Classification of harmonic filters by operating principle............................................................................ 7
2.5 Advantages/Disadvantages of each filter for application choice .............................................................. 11

CHAPTER 3 ....................................................................................................................................... 12

3.0 ACTIVE FILTERS RECOMMENDED STRATEGY.............................................................. 12


3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 12
3.2 Classification of active filters .................................................................................................................... 12
3.3 Classification according to power rating and speed of response in compensated system......................... 13
3.3.1 Low power applications ................................................................................................... 14
3.3.1.1 Single-phase systems .......................................................................................... 14
3.3.1.2 Three-phase systems ........................................................................................... 15
3.3.2 Medium power applications............................................................................................. 15
3.3.3 High power applications .................................................................................................. 16
3.4 Classification according to power circuit, configurations and connections ............................................. 17
3.4.1 Shunt active filters ........................................................................................................... 17
3.4.2 Series active filters........................................................................................................... 18
3.4.3 Other combinations .......................................................................................................... 19
3.4.3.1 Combination of both shunt and series active filters ............................................ 19
3.4.3.2 Combination of series active and shunt passive filters ....................................... 20
3.4.3.3 Combination of shunt active and passive filters ................................................. 21
3.4.3.4 Active filter in series with shunt passive filters .................................................. 22
3.5 Classification according to compensated variable.................................................................................... 23

ii
3.5.1 Reactive power compensation ......................................................................................... 23
3.5.2 Harmonic compensation .................................................................................................. 24
3.5.2.1 Compensation of voltage harmonics................................................................... 24
3.5.2.2 Compensation of current harmonics ................................................................... 24
3.5.3 Balancing of three phase systems .................................................................................... 25
3.5.3.1 Balancing of mains voltage in three phase systems ............................................ 25
3.5.3.2 Balancing of mains current in three phase systems............................................. 25
3.5.4 Multiple compensation..................................................................................................... 26
3.5.4.1 Harmonic current with reactive power compensation......................................... 26
3.5.4.2 Harmonic voltages with reactive power compensation....................................... 26
3.5.4.3 Harmonic current and voltages ........................................................................... 26
3.5.4.4 Harmonic current and voltages with reactive power compensation.................... 27
3.6 Classification based upon control technique............................................................................................. 28
3.6.1 Open loop systems ........................................................................................................... 28
3.6.2 Closed loop systems......................................................................................................... 28
3.6.2.1 Constant capacitor voltage technique.................................................................. 29
3.6.2.2 Constant inductor current technique ................................................................... 29
3.6.2.3 Optimisation technique ....................................................................................... 29
3.6.2.4 Linear voltage control technique......................................................................... 30
3.6.2.5 Other techniques ................................................................................................. 30
3.7 Active filters harmonic detection and extraction ....................................................................................... 31
3.7.1 Types of harmonic detection strategies............................................................................ 31
3.7.1.1 Load current sensing ........................................................................................... 31
3.7.1.2 Source current sensing ........................................................................................ 32
3.7.1.3 Point of Common Coupling (PCC) voltage sensing ........................................... 32
3.8 Classification based upon current/voltage reference estimation technique .............................................. 34
3.8.1 Current/voltage reference synthesis (continuous time-domain)....................................... 34
3.8.1.1 High pass filter method....................................................................................... 34
3.8.1.2 Low pass filter method........................................................................................ 35
3.8.2 Current/voltage reference calculation (discrete time or frequency domain) .................... 35
3.8.2.1 Time domain approaches .................................................................................... 35
3.8.2.1.1 Instantaneous reactive power algorithm ............................................... 36
3.8.2.1.2 Synchronous detection algorithm ......................................................... 37
3.8.2.1.3 Constant active power algorithm .......................................................... 37
3.8.2.1.4 Constant power factor algorithm .......................................................... 37
3.8.2.1.5 Fictitious power compensation algorithm............................................. 37
3.8.2.1.6 Synchronous frame based algorithm..................................................... 38
3.8.2.1.7 Synchronous flux detection algorithm .................................................. 38
3.8.2.2 Frequency domain approaches............................................................................ 38
3.8.2.2.1 Conventional Fourier and FFT algorithms ........................................... 39
3.8.2.2.2 Sine multiplication technique ............................................................... 39
3.8.2.2.3 Modified Fourier series techniques....................................................... 39
3.8.2.3 Other algorithms ................................................................................................. 40

CHAPTER 4 ....................................................................................................................................... 41

4.0 SHUNT ACTIVE FILTER WITH PQ CONTROLLER.......................................................... 41


4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 41
4.2 Summary of active filter operation ............................................................................................................ 41

iii
4.3 Critical component operation.................................................................................................................... 42
4.3.1 DC voltage regulator........................................................................................................ 42
4.3.2 Active Filter Controller.................................................................................................... 44
4.3.2.1 Positive-sequence voltage detector ..................................................................... 44
4.3.2.2 The PQ Theory.................................................................................................... 47
4.3.3 Dynamic hysteresis band PWM controller....................................................................... 50
4.3.4 Other components ............................................................................................................ 53

CHAPTER 5 ....................................................................................................................................... 54

5.0 TWO BUS NETWORK MODEL SIMULATION .................................................................... 54


5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 54
5.2 Simulation Component Comparison.......................................................................................................... 54
5.2.1 DC voltage regulator........................................................................................................ 55
5.2.2 Active Filter Controller.................................................................................................... 56
5.2.2.1 Positive Sequence Voltage Detector ................................................................... 56
5.2.2.1.1 Phase Locked Loop (PLL) and Sine Generator Model......................... 56
5.2.2.2 PQ Theory model................................................................................................ 59
5.2.2.3 Dynamic hysteresis PWM current converter model ........................................... 65
5.2.3 Inverter Injection.............................................................................................................. 66
5.2.4 System Modeling ............................................................................................................. 68

CHAPTER 6 ....................................................................................................................................... 69

6.0 MODEL VERIFICATION – CASE STUDIES ......................................................................... 69


6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 69
6.2 Verification Procedure – six pulse thyristor converter.............................................................................. 69
6.2.1 Harmonic load modeling.................................................................................................. 69
6.2.2 Compensation results ....................................................................................................... 70
6.2.3 Source Waveforms........................................................................................................... 71
6.3 Verification Procedure – Three phase diode rectifier ............................................................................... 73
6.3.1 Harmonic load modeling.................................................................................................. 73
6.3.2 Compensation Results...................................................................................................... 74
6.3.3 Source Waveforms........................................................................................................... 75
6.4 Discussion.................................................................................................................................................. 76

CHAPTER 7 ....................................................................................................................................... 78

7.0 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................. 78
7.1 Discussion.................................................................................................................................................. 78
7.2 Future Implications ................................................................................................................................... 79

CHAPTER 8 ....................................................................................................................................... 80

8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................ 80

APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................... 81
Appendix A – Gantt Chart ............................................................................................................................... 82

iv
Appendix B – Filter combinations ................................................................................................................... 84
Appendix C – Summary and Comparison of Filters ........................................................................................ 87
Appendix D – Shunt Active Filter System ........................................................................................................ 89
Appendix E – PQ Theory Controller ............................................................................................................... 90
Appendix F – DC Voltage Regulator MATLAB Code ..................................................................................... 91
Appendix G – Dynamic Hysteresis PWM Current Controller MATLAB Code................................................ 92

v
List of Figures

Figure 3.1 Generalized block diagram for active power filters [2] ..................................................... 13
Figure 3.2 Subdivisions of active filters according to speed response and power rating [2] .............. 14
Figure 3.3 Subdivision of power system filters according to power circuit configurations
and connections [2]............................................................................................................. 17
Figure 3.4 Shunt active filter used alone [4] ....................................................................................... 18
Figure 3.5 Shunt active filter network configuration [2] ..................................................................... 18
Figure 3.6 Series active filter configuration [2] .................................................................................. 19
Figure 3.7 Series active filter used alone [4]....................................................................................... 19
Figure 3.8 Combination of shunt and series active filters [2] ............................................................. 20
Figure 3.9 Series active and shunt filter combination [2] ................................................................... 20
Figure 3.10 Shunt active and shunt passive filter combination [2] ..................................................... 21
Figure 3.11 Active filter in series with shunt passive filter combination [2] ....................................... 22
Figure 3.12 Subdivision according to compensated variables [2]....................................................... 23
Figure 3.13 Classification of active power filters according to control techniques [2] ...................... 28
Figure 3.14 Load current sensing compensation schematic [7] .......................................................... 32
Figure 3.15 Source current sensing compensation schematic [7] ....................................................... 32
Figure 3.16 PCC voltage sensing compensation schematic [7]........................................................... 33
Figure 3.17 Subdivision according to current/voltage estimation techniques [2] ............................... 34
Figure 3.18 Calculations for the constant instantaneous supply power control strategy [8] .............. 36
Figure 4.1 DC voltage regulator schematic[6].................................................................................... 43
Figure 4.2 Block diagram of the fundamental positive sequence voltage detector [6] ........................ 47
Figure 4.3 Power components of the p-q theory in alpha-beta-0 coordinates [10]............................. 49
Figure 4.4 PQ theory control [6]......................................................................................................... 50
Figure 4.5 Hysteresis controller [6] .................................................................................................... 51
Figure 4.6 Hysteresis band PWM control [11].................................................................................... 52
Figure 5.1 Simulated DC voltage regulator circuit ............................................................................. 55
Figure 5.2 DC voltage regulator limit function ................................................................................... 55
Figure 5.3 Positive voltage sequence detector model .......................................................................... 56
Figure 5.4 PLL and sine generator ...................................................................................................... 57
Figure 5.5 Synchronising PLL circuit [12].......................................................................................... 57
Figure 5.6 Waveforms of Iα, Iβ and load current distortion ................................................................. 58
Figure 5.7 Total PQ theory model ....................................................................................................... 59
Figure 5.8 Power calculation............................................................................................................... 60
Figure 5.9 Clarke transformation ........................................................................................................ 60
Figure 5.10 Vα, Vβ to PQ controller ..................................................................................................... 60
Figure 5.11 Input harmonic load current............................................................................................. 61
Figure 5.12 Power waveform............................................................................................................... 61

vi
Figure 5.13 α-β current reference calculations ................................................................................... 62
Figure 5.14 Reference alpha-beta current ........................................................................................... 62
Figure 5.15 Alpha-Beta-0 to phase current compensation .................................................................. 63
Figure 5.16 Three phase compensation current................................................................................... 63
Figure 5.17 IEEE transaction paper comparisons – compensation currents [6] ................................ 64
Figure 5.18 Top stage view .................................................................................................................. 65
Figure 5.19 Hysteresis control model .................................................................................................. 66
Figure 5.20 Shunt inverter ................................................................................................................... 67
Figure 5.21 Shunt system ..................................................................................................................... 68
Figure 6.1 Three phase 6 pulse current source converter .................................................................. 69
Figure 6.2 Output current waveform ................................................................................................... 70
Figure 6.3 THD before active filter...................................................................................................... 70
Figure 6.4 THD reduction after active filter ........................................................................................ 71
Figure 6.5 Source current waveforms before compensation................................................................ 72
Figure 6.6 Source current waveforms after compensation .................................................................. 72
Figure 6.7 Single phase diode rectifier ................................................................................................ 73
Figure 6.8 Single phase diode rectifier output voltage and current..................................................... 73
Figure 6.9 Uncompensated THD system.............................................................................................. 74
Figure 6.10 Compensated THD system................................................................................................ 74
Figure 6.11 Uncompensated phase source current.............................................................................. 75
Figure 6.12 Diode rectifier compensated waveform ............................................................................ 75
Figure 6.13 Computed source and current waveforms [6] .................................................................. 76
Figure A.1 Gantt chart......................................................................................................................... 82
Figure A.2 Gantt chart (continued)...................................................................................................... 83
Figure B.1 Basic parallel-passive filter for current-source nonlinear loads. ...................................... 84
Figure B.2 Basic series-passive filter for voltage-source nonlinear loads. ......................................... 84
Figure B.3 Basic parallel-active filter for current-source nonlinear loads. ........................................ 84
Figure B.4 Basic series-active filter for voltage-source nonlinear loads............................................. 84
Figure B.5 Parallel combination of parallel-active and parallel-passive filters for current-
source nonlinear loads. ....................................................................................................... 84
Figure B.6 Series combination of series-active and series-passive filters for voltage-source
nonlinear loads.................................................................................................................... 84
Figure B.7 Hybrid of series-active and parallel-passive filters for current-source nonlinear
loads .................................................................................................................................... 84
Figure B.8 Hybrid of parallel-active and series-passive filters for voltage-source nonlinear
loads .................................................................................................................................... 84
Figure B.9 Series combination of parallel-passive and parallel-active filters for current-
source nonlinear loads ........................................................................................................ 84
Figure B.10 Parallel combination of series-passive and series-active filters for voltage-
source nonlinear loads. ....................................................................................................... 85
Figure B.11 Combined system of series-active and parallel-active filters for current-source
nonlinear loads.................................................................................................................... 85

vii
Figure B.12 Combined system of series-active and parallel-active filters for voltage-source
nonlinear loads.................................................................................................................... 85
Figure B.13 Combined system of series-passive and parallel-passive filters for current-
source nonlinear loads. ....................................................................................................... 85
Figure B.14 Combined system of parallel-passive and series-passive filters for voltage-
source nonlinear loads. ....................................................................................................... 85
Figure B.15 Circuit I to reduce fundamental voltage of parallel-active filter. .................................... 85
Figure B.16 Circuit I to reduce fundamental current of series-active filter......................................... 85
Figure B.17 Circuit II to reduce fundamental voltage of parallel-active filter. ................................... 85
Figure B.18 Circuit II to reduce fundamental current of series-active filter. ...................................... 85
Figure B.19 Circuit III to reduce fundamental voltage of parallel-active filter................................... 86
Figure B.20 Circuit III to reduce fundamental current of series-active filter. ..................................... 86
Figure B.21 Circuit IV to reduce fundamental voltage of parallel-active filter................................... 86
Figure B.22 Circuit IV to reduce fundamental current of series-active filter. ..................................... 86
Figure D.1 Shunt active filter system ................................................................................................... 89
Figure E.1 PQ theory controller .......................................................................................................... 90

viii
List of Tables

Table 4.1 Variation conditions for the capacitor voltage Vc1 and Vc2................................................. 42
Table C.1A Comparison of filters ........................................................................................................ 87
Table C.1A (continued) Comparison of filters ..................................................................................... 88

ix
CHAPTER 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 The need for harmonic compensation

The implementation of Active Filters in this modern electronic age has become an

increasingly essential element to the power network. With advancements in

technology since the early eighties and significant trends of power electronic devices

among consumers and industry, utilities are continually pressured in providing a

quality and reliable supply. Power electronic devices such as computers, printers,

faxes, fluorescent lighting and most other office equipment all create harmonics.

These types of devices are commonly classified collectively as ‘nonlinear loads’.

Nonlinear loads create harmonics by drawing current in abrupt short pulses rather

than in a smooth sinusoidal manner.

In Australia, generators are designed to operate at the fundamental frequency of 50

Hz. Harmonics of frequencies above this value that are created at the load end must be

supplied from the generator. The major issues associated with the supply of

harmonics to nonlinear loads are severe overheating and insulation damage. Increased

operating temperatures of generators and transformers degrade the insulation material

of its windings. If this heating were continued to the point at which the insulation

fails, a flashover may occur should it be combined with leakage current from its

conductors. This would permanently damage the device and result in loss of

generation causing widespread blackouts.

1
One solution to this foreseeable problem is to install active filters for each nonlinear

load in the power system network. Although presently very uneconomical, the

installation of active filters proves indispensable for solving power quality problems

in distribution networks such as harmonic current compensation, reactive current

compensation, voltage sag compensation, voltage flicker compensation and negative

phase sequence current compensation. Ultimately, this would ensure a polluted free

system with increased reliability and quality.

1.2 Objective and aims

The objective of this project is to thoroughly analyse and simulate a shunt active

power filter. In doing so, the accuracy of current compensation for current harmonics

found at a nonlinear load, for the PQ theory control technique is supported and also

substantiates the reliability and effectiveness of this model for integration into a

power system network. The model is implemented across a two bus network

including generation to the application of the nonlinear load.

The aim of the system simulation is to verify the active filters effectiveness for a

variety of different nonlinear load cases. These are a six pulse thyristor current

converter and a three phase diode bridge rectifier with RL load. In each scenario, total

harmonic distortion measurements are undertaken along with a variety of waveforms

and the results are justified accordingly.

One of the most important features of the shunt active filter system proposed is its

versatility over a variety of different conditions. The application of the positive

2
sequence voltage detector from within the active filter controller is the key component

of the system. The positive sequence voltage detector gives incredible versatility to

the application of the active filter, because it can be installed and compensate for load

current harmonics even when the input voltage is highly distorted and unbalanced.

When filters alike do not contain this feature and is installed with a distorted voltage

input, the outcome is a low efficient current harmonic compensator with poor

accuracy of compensation current determination.

1.3 Overview of project

Chapter 2 introduces the concept of harmonic filtering and the key approaches

undertaken in compensation. It gives an overview of the different types of harmonic

filters and their advantages and disadvantages in application.

Chapter 3 promotes the concept of active filters as a recommended strategy in

providing accurate harmonic compensation. Active filters are classified according to

power rating, speed of response, power circuit, the compensated variable, the control

technique and the current/voltage reference determination.

Chapter 4 describes the shunt three phase active filter model configuration. The

reasoning behind major key components of the model are thoroughly argued

discussed.

3
Chapter 5 implements the simulation of the shunt three phase active filter

configuration discussed in chapter 4. Each aspect is thoroughly discussed and is

compared to the IEEE transaction paper for verification.

Chapter 6 provides the model verification of the shunt active filter in the form of two

case study scenarios. Each case study is investigated and an output of the results are

justified.

Chapter 7 concluded the thesis and provides suggestions for future scope of work.

(See Appendix A for project plan)

4
CHAPTER 2

2.0 THEORY OF HARMONICS FILTERS

2.1 What are harmonic filters?

Harmonic filters are used to eliminate the harmonic distortion caused by nonlinear

loads. Specifically, harmonic filters are designed to attenuate or in some filters

eliminate the potentially dangerous effects of harmonic currents active within the

power distribution system. Filters can be designed to trap these currents and, through

the use of a series of capacitors, coils, and resistors, shunt them to ground. A filter

may contain several of these elements, each designed to compensate a particular

frequency or an array of frequencies.

2.2 Types of harmonic filters involved in harmonic compensation

Filters are often the most common solution that is used to mitigate harmonics from a

power system. Unlike other solutions, filters offer a simpler inexpensive alternative

with high benefits. There are three different types of filters each offering their own

unique solution to reduce and eliminate harmonics. These harmonic filters are

broadly classified into passive, active and hybrid structures. The choice of filter used

is dependent upon the nature of the problem and the economic cost associated with

implementation.

A passive filter is composed of only passive elements such as inductors, capacitors

and resistors thus not requiring any operational amplifiers. Passive filters are

inexpensive compared with most other mitigating devices. Its structure may be either

of the series or parallel type. The structure chosen for implementation depends on the

type of harmonic source present. Internally, they cause the harmonic current to

5
resonate at its frequency. Through this approach, the harmonic currents are

attenuated in the LC circuits tuned to the harmonic orders requiring filtering. This

prevents the severe harmonic currents traveling upstream to the power source

causing increased widespread problems.

An active filter is implemented when orders of harmonic currents are varying. One

case evident of demanding varying harmonics from the power system are variable

speed drives. Its structure may be either of the series of parallel type. The structure

chosen for implementation depends on the type of harmonic sources present in the

power system and the effects that different filter solutions would cause to the overall

system performance. Active filters use active components such as IGBT-transistors

to inject negative harmonics into the network effectively replacing a portion of the

distorted current wave coming from the load. This is achieved by producing

harmonic components of equal amplitude but opposite phase shift, which cancel the

harmonic components of the non-linear loads.

Hybrid filters combine an active filter and a passive filter. Its structure may be either

of the series or parallel type. The passive filter carries out basic filtering (5th order,

for example) and the active filter, through precise control, covers higher harmonics.

6
2.3 Classification of harmonic filters by system configuration

There are many filter configurations which can be designed to eliminate troublesome

harmonic orders or to suppress them. The characterization of nonlinear loads and

their effects on the power system has lead to the derivation of 22 filter configurations

as shown in figures B.1 through to B.22. Figures B.1, B.3, B.5, B.7, B.9, B.15, B.17,

B.19 and B.21 are recognised configurations and figures B.2, B.4 and B.11 are

unfamiliar. Figures B.6, B.8, B.10, B.12, B.13, B.14, B.16, B.18, B.20 and B.22 are

novel and newly presented by [1]. Figures B.1, B.3, B.5, B.7, B.9, B.11, B.13, B.15,

B.17, B.19 and B.21 are dual to figures B.2, B.4, B.6, B.8, B.10, B.12, B.14, B.16,

B.18, B.20 and B.22 respectively. The filter configurations are in either parallel or

series however, the components used to achieve this are the same. This is due to the

two types of harmonic sources namely, current type and voltage type sources. It is

evident that other combinations based on these 22 basic configurations are possible.

For example, figures B.9 and B.10 can be modified using the dominant harmonic

active filter technique [1].

2.4 Classification of harmonic filters by operating principle

The configuration shown in figure B.1 is that of a parallel passive filter (PPF). The

PPF contains resonant LC tuned components corresponding to a particular harmonic

frequency. The filter is designed to provide a high impedance block at the load or

harmonic current source. This high impedance path effectively blocks currents of the

tuned harmonic order, thus acting as a harmonic current sink. The ultimate circuit of

the PPF is a capacitor. The configuration shown in figure B.2 is that of a series

passive filter (SPF). Unlike the PPF, the SPF acts like a current harmonic dam

providing high impedance blocks to the harmonic voltages of a specific order which

is tuned by the resonant LC components. In Figure B.2 , three resonant passive

7
filters are connected in series of which each LC component is tuned for the

respective 5th, 7th and 11th harmonic orders. The three resonant circuits provide a high

impedance path specifically designed to block the 5th, 7th and 11th harmonic orders

respectively. The ultimate circuit of the SPF is an inductor [1].

Figure B.3 shows the basic configuration of a parallel active filter (PAF). This filter

injects and supplies to the nonlinear load, harmonic currents of the same amplitude

but opposite phase shift. This effectively is designed to cancel the load harmonic

current. Thus, this filter acts like a harmonic current source. Figure B.4 shows the

basic configuration of a series active filter (SAF). Unlike the configuration in figure

B.3, this filter is connected in series and injects and supplies to the nonlinear voltage

source, harmonic voltage of the same amplitude but of opposite phase. This filter acts

like a harmonic voltage source to block harmonic current flow. The inverter used for

the PAF and SAF can be either a voltage source or current source inverter. In figures,

B.3-B.4, a voltage source inverter was used and this is evident by the energy storing

capacitor connected [1].

A parallel and series combination of a PAF and PPF is shown in figures B.5 and B.6,

respectively. The parallel combination is compatible for current source nonlinear

loads and the series combination is well-matched with voltage source nonlinear loads

as discussed previously. Due to the limited switching frequency and rating of the

active inverter, the PAF is better suited for the compensation of low order harmonics

such as the 5th and 7th. The PPF on the other hand is better equipped and compact to

handle the upper order harmonics such as the 11th. The combination of the two filters

provides excellent role sharing and be used in applications where a number of lower

and upper harmonics are present [1].

8
Figure B.7 shows a hybrid system of a small SAF and a PPF for current-source

nonlinear loads. The small SAF is used to eliminate the PPF’s problems, such as

resonance and influence of the source impedance, and enhance compensation

performance. The PPF sinks the load-harmonic current. Figure B.8 and B.7 are dual

circuits, where the hybrid system of a PAF and a SPF is designed for voltage-source

nonlinear loads. Contrary to figure B.7, the SPF in figure B.8 blocks harmonic

current and the PAF can be used to enhance the SPF’s performance and eliminate the

SPF’s resonance [1].

Figure B.9 shows a unique configuration whereby the rating of the PAF can be

reduced. This figure shows the series combination of a PPF and PAF. The PAF as

usual, injects harmonic current to the load to cancel out the load harmonics. In

addition, the PAF also provides fundamental current. This reduces the size of the VA

rating of the PAF and still provides excellent performance, as does a PAF. Figure

B.10 is the dual circuit of figure B.9 and shows a parallel combination of a SPF and

SAF. Similarly, the VA rating of the SAF can be reduced by letting fundamental

current through the SPF [1].

Figure B.11 shows a perfect model for true filter elimination for current source

nonlinear loads. This configuration includes all active components and therefore is

designed to eliminate all harmonic content rather than simply providing attenuation.

The PAF as usual, supplies harmonic current to the nonlinear load of equal amplitude

but opposite phase to cancel the load harmonic current. The SAF also blocks any

harmonic current from flowing through the line. In providing total elimination of

9
harmonic current, this configuration also ensures a pure sinusoidal and constant

voltage to the load. Figure B.12 is the dual circuit of figure B.11. This configuration

is ideal for voltage type harmonic loads. This system blocks harmonic current and

provides a pure sinusoidal voltage to all loads connected. Figure B.13 and B.14 show

the respective combination of passive filters for harmonic current-source loads and

harmonic voltage-source loads [1].

Active filters are expensive and have difficulties with high power application,

although their performance is superior. It is desirable to reduce active filters required

rating. Figures B.15 through B.22 shows examples of how to reduce fundamental

voltage across the PAF and fundamental current through the SAF. For example, in

figure B.15 the C and L form a voltage divider to reduce fundamental voltage across

the PAF. The fundamental voltage across the PAF is determined by impedance ratio

of C and L. Figure B.16 shows the dual circuit of figure B.15, where C and L form a

current divider to reduce fundamental current of the SAF. In figure B.17, an LC

parallel circuit resonating at the fundamental frequency is used to increase the

impedance ratio and reduce the fundamental voltage further. On the contrary, figure

B.18 uses an LC series resonating at the line frequency, thus further reducing the

SAF’s fundamental current. In figures B.19 and B.21, fundamental voltages across

the PAF can be reduced to zero by controlling the PAF’s injected fundamental

current. Similarly, in figures B.20 and B.22, fundamental current through the SAF

can be reduced to zero by controlling the SAF’s produced fundamental voltage [1].

10
2.5 Advantages/Disadvantages of each filter for application choice

Shunt passive filters have been widely used because of their low cost and low loss.

This is because the components are common but also because no active elements are

required. The performances of the filters are very sensitive to the power system

impedance and series or parallel resonance with the power system impedance may

occur. Also, the effective compensation with the variation of the voltage can not be

carried out with passive filters.

The performance of parallel active power filters (APF) does not depend on the power

system impedance, and dynamic compensation of harmonic and reactive power can

be achieved. Unfortunately, the VA rating of the power electronic converter in APF

becomes very large because it must withstand the line-frequency utility voltage.

Associated with the large VA converter rating are high cost, high electro-magnetic

interference and high power losses.

Appendix C summarises the main features of all configurations in terms of control


schemes, circuit designs and application considerations.

11
CHAPTER 3
3.0 ACTIVE FILTERS RECOMMENDED STRATEGY

3.1 Introduction

Active Filters are commonly used for providing harmonic compensation to a system

by controlling current harmonics in supply networks at the low to medium voltage

distribution level or for reactive power or voltage control at high voltage distribution

level [2]. These functions may be combined in a single circuit to achieve the various

functions mentioned above or in separate active filters which can attack each aspect

individually. The block diagram presented in section 3.2 shows the basic sequence of

operation for the active filter. This diagram shows various sections of the filter each

responding to its own classification.

3.2 Classification of active filters

The block diagram shown in figure 3.1 represents the key components of a typical

active power filter along with their interconnections. The reference signal estimator

monitors the harmonic current from the nonlinear load along with information about

other system variables. The reference signal from the current estimator, as well as

other signals, drives the overall system controller. This in turn provides the control

for the PWM switching pattern generator. The output of the PWM pattern generator

controls the power circuit through a suitable interface. The power circuit in the

generalized block diagram can be connected in parallel, series or parallel/series

configurations, depending on the transformer used [2].

12
Figure 3.1 Generalized block diagram for active power filters [2]

Active power filters according to [2] can be classified based on the following criteria:

1. Power rating and speed of response required in compensated systems;

2. Power-circuit configuration and connections;

3. System parameters to be compensated;

4. Control techniques employed; and

5. Technique used for estimating the reference current/voltage.

3.3 Classification according to power rating and speed of response in compensated

system

The block diagram shown in figure 3.2 shows the classification based on this

criterion. The size of nonlinear loads play a major role in deciding the way different

control methods are implemented. The filter required for compensation must be

practical for the load and this decision affects the speed of response. In general a

reciprocal relationship exists between the cost of a particular system to the required

speed of response [2].

13
Figure 3.2 Subdivisions of active filters according to speed response and power rating [2]

3.3.1 Low power applications


Low power applications govern applications with a power rating below 100kVA.

Applications of these sizes are generally associated with residential areas,

commercial buildings, hospitals and for a wide range of medium sized factory loads

and motor drive systems. Active filters chosen for this power range employ

sophisticated techniques catering with high pulse number PWM voltage or current

source inverters. The response time for smaller applications is relatively much faster

than other sizes ranging from ten microseconds to ten milliseconds. This type

comprises the following two categories [2].

3.3.1.1 Single-phase systems

Low power rating loads generally require single phase active filters [3]. They are

generally most employed in commercial buildings with a large number of computers.

This application means that current harmonics can be treated at the point of common

coupling (PCC). It is often economical and practical to install single phase active

filters on distribution based sites of reduced size capacity than a larger rated filter

installed upstream. This is due to the large number of the single-phase loads within

14
one building and the harmful consequences associated with the presence of large

amounts of harmonic in the neutral line. This allows for more selective compensation

as the operating conditions vary. Due to the load capacity drawn from residential

loads, it is rare for a high concentration of harmonics, and thus the impacts on the

neutral lines are not significant. Residential customers tend not invest in purchasing

active filters because there are no compulsory harmonic regulations however, the

main advantage of such an installation are that operating frequencies can be

increased moving to improved performance since only low ratings are employed [2].

3.3.1.2 Three-phase systems

The installation of three-phase filters is used for three-phase applications. Different

filter configurations can be tested and installed based upon whether the loads are

balanced or unbalanced. At levels below 100kVA, a three phase filter can be

reconfigured to compensate for three individual single phases in one unit or for a

single three-phase supply. When nonlinear loads are balanced, meaning all three

phased impedances are equal, a single three-phase-inverter configuration is

employed [4]. This choice of inverter is used when the objective is to eliminate as

many current harmonics as possible, assuming that the magnitudes and respective

phase angles in each phase are the same. In the situation when nonlinear loads are

unbalanced, or supply voltages are unsymmetrical, three single phase inverter

circuits are used [2].

3.3.2 Medium power applications


Power systems ranging between 100kVA to 10MVA fit the class of a medium power

application. Due to the fact that phase unbalances are reduced on this sized system,

the major objective is to eliminate current harmonics. In general, capacitive and

15
inductive static compensators, line-commutated thyristor converters, synchronous

condensers and cascaded multilevel-inverter VAR compensators, are often more

economic as reactive power compensation using active filters often is not viable.

This is due to the high voltage as well as problems with isolation and series/parallel

connection of switches. The speed of response expected in this range is of the order

of tens of milliseconds. [2]

3.3.3 High power applications


At high power ratings, the use of active filters becomes very uneconomical. This is

because of the lack of high switching frequency power devices that can control the

current flow. Thus, this is a major disadvantage for such systems. In addition, even

the latest advances in semiconductor technology still fall short as extra high voltages

of a few hundred kilovolts cannot be tolerated. The series-parallel combination is

possible however; implementation is difficult and also cost-ineffective. Harmonic

pollution upstream affecting high power ranges above 10MVA is not such a problem

compared against low power systems. The implementation of single and three phase

filters downstream at the low voltage system provides suitable compensation such

that significant harmonic pollution upstream is minimal. The static-VAR

compensation is then the major concern and is usually compensated for by using

traditional static power conditioners/filters as well as several sets of synchronous

condensers connected in parallel and cascaded multilevel-inverter VAR

compensators. The required response time for such cases is in the range of tens of

seconds, which is sufficient for contactors and circuit breakers to operate after taking

the optimal-switching decision. Power fluctuations in the range of a few seconds are,

on the other hand, treated by the generating stations' ancillary devices. [2]

16
3.4 Classification according to power circuit, configurations and connections

The choice of power circuit chosen for the active filter greatly influences its

efficiency and accuracy in providing true compensation. It is therefore important that

the correct circuit configuration is chosen. Figure 3.3 classes’ three major types of

filter structures along with the relevant power circuit.

Figure 3.3 Subdivision of power system filters according to power circuit configurations and
connections [2]

3.4.1 Shunt active filters


Shunt active filters are by far the most widely accept and dominant filter of choice in

most industrial processes. Figures 3.4-3.5 show the system configuration of the shunt

design. The active filter is connected in parallel at the PCC and is fed from the main

power circuit. The objective of the shunt active filter is to supply opposing harmonic

current to the nonlinear load effectively resulting in a net harmonic current. This

means that the supply signals remain purely fundamental. Shunt filters also have the

additional benefit of contributing to reactive power compensation and balancing of

three-phase currents. Since the active filter is connected in parallel to the PCC, only

the compensation current plus a small amount of active fundamental current is

carried in the unit. For an increased range of power ratings, several shunt active

filters can be combined together to withstand higher currents. This configuration

consists of four distinct categories of circuit, namely inverter configurations,

17
switched-capacitor circuits, lattice-structured filters and voltage-regulator-type

filters[2].

Figure 3.4 Shunt active filter used alone [4]

Figure 3.5 Shunt active filter network configuration [2]

3.4.2 Series active filters


The objective of the series active filter is to maintain a pure sinusoidal voltage

waveform across the load. This is achieved by producing a PWM voltage waveform

which is added or subtracted against the supply voltage waveform. The choice of

power circuit used in most cases is the voltage-fed PWM inverter without a current

minor loop. The active filter acts as a voltage source and thus it is often a preferred

solution of harmonic producing loads such as large capacity diode rectifiers with

capacitive loads. In general, series active filters are less commonly used against the

shunt design. Unlike the shunt filter which carries mainly compensation current, the

series circuit has to handle high load currents. This causes an increased rating of the

filter suitable to carry the increased current. Series filters offer the main advantage

over the shunt configuration of achieving ac voltage regulation by eliminating

18
voltage-waveform harmonics. This means the load contains a pure sinusoidal

waveform [2].

Figure 3.6 Series active filter configuration [2]

Figure 3.7 Series active filter used alone [4]

3.4.3 Other combinations


In some cases, the combinations of shunt and series active filters provide a greater

effectiveness in eliminating harmonic pollution from the system.

3.4.3.1 Combination of both shunt and series active filters

The diagram shown in figure 3.8 shows the combination of both parallel and series

active filters. This system combines both the benefits of the shunt and series and is

often used to achieve the demanding power system requirements. The control of

active filters can be complex. A combination of the two provides an even greater

complexity. The higher cost involved in a more complex design has shown a reduced

demand for the combined structure. As a result of the increased cost and complexity,

this combination has received less attention than other configurations. Flexible AC

19
transmission systems, commonly abbreviated as FACTS regularly make use of the

arrangement [2].

Figure 3.8 Combination of shunt and series active filters [2]

3.4.3.2 Combination of series active and shunt passive filters

The combination of the active parallel and active series filters in 3.4.3.1 was seen to

be very complex in control yielding a high cost. One method of reducing these

problems was to replace the parallel active filter with a passive structure. The series

active filter, which constitutes high impedance for high-frequency harmonics, is

accompanied by a parallel passive filter to provide a path for the harmonic currents

of the load. This combination, represented by figure 3.9, permits an improvement

over the characteristics of plain series active filters and the extension of their

capabilities to include current- harmonic reduction and voltage- harmonic

elimination. Passive filters are often easier and simple to implement and do not

require any control circuit. This, this deserves to be most beneficial. [2]

Figure 3.9 Series active and shunt filter combination [2]

20
3.4.3.3 Combination of shunt active and passive filters

As mentioned in 3.4.1, shunt active filters are best suitable to compensate for lower

order harmonics thus only requiring low power rating which serves most economical.

This configuration makes use of a passive filter which serves to compensate for the

high order load current harmonics. This combination, represented by figure 3.10

presents this important configuration. Combinations such as this can be designed to

compensate for higher powers without excessive costs for high-power switching. The

major disadvantage of this configuration is the fact that passive filters can only be

tuned for a specific predefined harmonic and thus cannot be easily changed for loads

which have varying harmonics. [2]

Figure 3.10 Shunt active and shunt passive filter combination [2]

21
3.4.3.4 Active filter in series with shunt passive filters

The combination of an active filter in series with a shunt passive filter is considered a

significant design configuration for medium and high voltage applications. The

passive filter is designed to reduce the voltage stress applied to the switches in the

active filter. This design is in its infancy of development however, further research is

still needed to assess the effectiveness of the configuration. [2]

Figure 3.11 Active filter in series with shunt passive filter combination [2]

22
3.5 Classification according to compensated variable

Active filters are designed to provide suitable compensation for a particular variable

or a multiple of sorts in cases of combination structures. Figure 3.12 shows the

variety of compensated variable that active filters can provide for.

Figure 3.12 Subdivision according to compensated variables [2]

3.5.1 Reactive power compensation

The shunt active filter does provide reactive power compensation however; they

rarely treat the problem of power-factor correction on its own owing to the fact that

other quasidynamic, cheaper and slower-in-response reactive-power compensators

are available in the market. When this technique is applied, lower power applications

are more suited since the currents needed for reactive-power compensation are of the

same order of magnitude as the rated current of the load. It would be a waste of

sophisticated equipment to tackle them without the use of other power factor-

correction devices, such as thyristor-controlled reactors and capacitors; especially in

single-phase systems, where in certain specific applications the requirement is for

accurate compensation without harmonics generation [2].

23
3.5.2 Harmonic compensation

Within the system, active filters can be used to provide suitable harmonic

compensation for voltage harmonics and current harmonics. These harmonic are the

most important variable requiring compensation.

3.5.2.1 Compensation of voltage harmonics

In general, the concern for compensating voltage harmonics is not high due to the

fact that power supplies usually have low impedance [5]. Generally, at the point of

common coupling, ridged standards are implemented to ensure a correct level of total

harmonic distortion (THD) and voltage regulation is maintained. The problem of

compensating for voltage harmonics is to ensure the supply to be purely sinusoidal.

This is important for harmonic voltage sensitive devices such as power system

protection devices and superconducting magnetic energy storage. Voltage harmonics

are related to current harmonics by the impedance of the line. Although

compensation of voltage harmonics helps to provide a reduction in current

harmonics, this however, does not negate the necessity to current harmonic

compensation [2].

3.5.2.2 Compensation of current harmonics

Current harmonic compensation strategies are exceptionally important as mentioned

by [4]. From 3.5.2.1, current harmonics are greatly reduced by the compensation of

voltage harmonics at the consumer’s point of common coupling. The reduction in

current harmonics is not only important for reasons such as device heating and

reduction in life of devices but also in design of power system equipment. One of the

major design criteria covers the magnitude of the current and its waveform. This is to

reduce cable and feeder losses. Since the root mean square (RMS) of the load current

24
incorporates the sum of squares of individual harmonics, true current harmonic

compensation will aid system designers for better approached power rating

equipment [2].

3.5.3 Balancing of three phase systems

In most low and medium voltage distribution systems, it is frequent to find situations

where the currents and voltages in the three phases are not balanced and are not

evenly distributed by 120 degrees.

3.5.3.1 Balancing of mains voltage in three phase systems


Voltage imbalance is a situation where each phase voltage is unequal in magnitude

and is not displaced by 120 degrees. This is a direct result of current imbalances and

the severity of the system imbalances is governed by the magnitude of the supply

impedance. The solution to this problem is to add or subtract the corresponding

amount of instantaneous voltage to force it to follow the reference sinusoidal

waveform. On high voltage systems, the supply impedance does not impact severely

on system performance and thus the problem of mains voltage unbalances are

primarily related to low rating systems. [2]

3.5.3.2 Balancing of mains current in three phase systems

In low power applications such as compensating for residential loads, the magnitude

of currents supplied to the grid depends entirely upon the level of imbalance in the

system. In most cases, the compensator would be forced to supply rated current [4].

This places a limitation on the power handling capability.

25
3.5.4 Multiple compensation

To target a variety of variables requiring compensation, often it is usual to combine

different combinations to improve the effectiveness of the filter. The following are

the most frequently used combinations.

3.5.4.1 Harmonic current with reactive power compensation

One very common filter design makes use of combining aspects of reactive power

compensation together with harmonic current elimination. This ensures the supply

current remains purely fundamental free from distributing harmonics whilst making

certain the current is in phase with the supply voltage [6]. This approach is very cost

effective because only one device is used for all aspects rather than including

multiple circuits for each individual objective. The active filter used here however,

suffers from poor power switching limits and thus can only serve as a compensator

for low powered applications [2].

3.5.4.2 Harmonic voltages with reactive power compensation

This combination, however rare, takes place in certain configurations for controlling

the voltage harmonics, which would normally affect indirectly (using suitable

feedback) the reactive-power compensation. This compensation system is only

suitable for low-power applications [2].

3.5.4.3 Harmonic current and voltages

To compensate for both current and voltage system harmonics, a shunt and series

active filter configuration must be used respectively. Integrating this filter serves to

eliminate load harmonics whilst ensuring the supply remains fundamental. This type

of design contains very complex control algorithms and is normally used only for

26
very sensitive devices such as power-system-protection equipment and

superconducting magnetic-energy storage systems [2].

3.5.4.4 Harmonic current and voltages with reactive power


compensation

This filter design incorporates all three compensating variables into one unit. It

controls all harmonics and reactive power within the system. This is achieved by

implementing of a parallel/series active filter combination. The control for this

design is very complex and difficult to maintain and thus is not often employed [2].

27
3.6 Classification based upon control technique

Figure 3.13 presents the basic control structure for active power system filters. The

two main techniques are open look control and closed loop control.

Figure 3.13 Classification of active power filters according to control techniques [2]

3.6.1 Open loop systems

Open-loop systems sense the load current and the harmonics it contains. They inject

a fixed amount of power in the form of current (mainly reactive) into the system,

which may compensate for most of the harmonics and/or reactive power available.

Since there is no feedback loop on this system, there is no reference to check the

performance and accuracy of the filter. This is a traditional technique and in present

day is not often used [2].

3.6.2 Closed loop systems

Closed loop control systems incorporate a feedback loop providing greater accuracy

of current injection for harmonic compensation as well as reactive power reduction

well over the open loop design. This feature enables true sensing of the required

variables under consideration. Almost all new techniques in use are of this type.

28
3.6.2.1 Constant capacitor voltage technique

In this technique, the DC link contains a capacitor and once charged, this capacitor

voltage is the voltage source which controls the current waveform by PWM

techniques. The voltage across the terminals of the capacitor often fluctuates due to

the fact that energy is either supplied or expelled. To regulate and maintain terminal

voltage levels, a reference voltage is chosen. The difference between the actual

capacitor voltage and the predefined reference voltage determines the active

component of power required to compensate for losses in the filter. This error

difference is added to the current-controller error signal to determine the overall

system error to be processed by the current controller. This technique is widely

accepted and is very popular [2].

3.6.2.2 Constant inductor current technique

The control replaces the use of the capacitor in the DC link with an inductor. The

system operates much the same as mentioned in 3.6.2.1 however; the capacitor

voltage is replaced with the inductor current. This is achieved in two ways: (i)

current pulse-width modulation where like in 3.6.2.1, the PWM provides the required

pulses to represent the average current signal and (ii) current pulse amplitude

modulation which is a new control method provides the active filter with a basis for

amplitude modulation rather than solely the width [2].

3.6.2.3 Optimisation technique

The optimization procedure for switched-capacitor and lattice-filter circuits is the

same. The rate of rise of the current and the amplitude depend mainly on the size of

the capacitors and the initial voltages on them. These factors are functions of the

switching patterns, and they provide considerable flexibility in shaping the waveform

of the current drawn by the filter. The key to controlling these filter configurations is

29
to determine the appropriate switching function for the switches. The main task of

the system controller is to minimise a predetermined number of individual load-

current harmonics, in addition minimising either the THD or the fundamental

component of the filter current. However, this is not performed instantaneously. A

time delay exists between the detection of a change in the harmonic current and the

application of the new set of switching angles obtained from the optimisation

procedure. This system is mainly suitable for constant or slowly varying loads [2].

3.6.2.4 Linear voltage control technique

Series active filters incorporating the additional benefit of voltage regulation can be

controlled using the linear voltage control technique. Through regularly charging and

discharging the capacitor through linear control, the capacitor voltage can be

regulated. The reference capacitor voltage can be determined based upon the

harmonic reference. The charge in the supply loop of the circuit and thus switching

frequency can be controlled by the regular variations of the capacitor voltage in

contrast to the abrupt changes in inverter voltage waveforms. This technique ensures

that the supply side receives no abrupt variation of voltage and this reduces the

amount of high-frequency harmonics injected into the supply due to the presence of

the PWM inverter [2].

3.6.2.5 Other techniques

Other control techniques exist that simply provide small changes to the

aforementioned techniques, providing simply newer or better performance over their

predecessors. These techniques may include the use of state of the art adaptive,

predictive and sliding-mode controllers, which are normally difficult to implement

without the use of Digital Signal Processing (DSP). These techniques can be

implemented in either the time domain or the frequency domain [2].

30
3.7 Active filters harmonic detection and extraction

A shunt active filter acts as a controllable harmonic current source. In principle,

harmonic compensation is achieved when the current source is commanded to inject

harmonic currents of the same magnitude but opposite phase to the load harmonic

currents. Before the inverter can subtly inject opposing harmonic currents into the

power system, appropriate harmonic detection strategies must be implemented to

efficiently sense and determine the harmonic current from the nonlinear load.

3.7.1 Types of harmonic detection strategies

There are 3 different types of harmonic detection strategies used to determine the

current reference for the active filter. These are [4],

1. Measuring the load harmonic current to be compensated and using this as a

reference command;

2. Measuring source harmonic current and controlling the filter to minimise it;

and

3. Measuring harmonic voltage at the active filter point of common coupling

(PCC) and controlling the filter to minimise the voltage distortion.

3.7.1.1 Load current sensing

This method involves measurement of the load current and subsequent extraction of

its harmonic content using a high pass filter scheme. The harmonic components, so

extracted, are adjusted for polarity and used as reference commands for the current

controller. This is explained with the help of equation 3.1 and figure 3.14. Denoting

the harmonic components of the load current by ilh , the describing equation for this

strategy is

31
i*c (t ) = ilh (t ) (3.1)

Figure 3.14 Load current sensing compensation schematic [7]

3.7.1.2 Source current sensing

In this strategy, the source current is measured and its harmonic component

extracted. This is scaled by a suitable controller, generally of the proportional type.

The output of the proportional controller is provided as a reference to the current

controller. This is schematically represented in figure 3.15 and analytically expressed

by equation 3.2. Denoting the harmonic components of the source current by ish , the

describing equation for this strategy is

i*c (t ) = − K sh × ish (t ) (3.2)

Figure 3.15 Source current sensing compensation schematic [7]

3.7.1.3 Point of Common Coupling (PCC) voltage sensing

This method requires measurement of the harmonic component of the Point of

Common Coupling (PCC) voltage, e(t). The harmonic component is then used to

generate the current reference, after passing it through a proportional controller.

Schematically, it is represented in figure 3.16 and analytically expressed by equation

32
3.3. Denoting the harmonic components of the PCC voltage by eh , the describing

equation for this strategy is

i*c (t ) = K vh × eh (t ) (3.3)

Figure 3.16 PCC voltage sensing compensation schematic [7]

Load current sensing and supply current sensing are suitable for shunt active filters

installed in the vicinity of one or more harmonic producing loads by individual high-

powered consumers. PCC voltage sensing is suitable for shunt active filters, which

will be installed on distribution systems by utilities. Supply current detection is the

most basic harmonic detection method for series active filters acting as a voltage

source [4].

33
3.8 Classification based upon current/voltage reference estimation technique

There are numerous techniques each sub classified in figure 3.17 which propose
methods to calculate and determine the appropriate compensating reference current
used for the active filter to pass to the PWM inverter.

Active power-system filters


Instant reactive power
Time
Synchronous detection
domain
Constant active power
Constant (utility) power factor
Current/voltage Current/voltage Frequency
Fictitious power consumption
reference synthesis Reference calculation domain
Synchronous frame
Synchronous flux detection
Highpass-filter method Other
algorithms Conventional Fourier and FFT
Sine-multiplication technique
Lowpass-filter method
Modified-Fourier-series technique

Figure 3.17 Subdivision according to current/voltage estimation techniques [2]

3.8.1 Current/voltage reference synthesis (continuous time-domain)

In this method, an analogue signal filter is applied at the supply side to determine the

current harmonics from the supply. This technique is very simple and easy to

implement however introduces major amounts of magnitude and phase errors [2].

3.8.1.1 High pass filter method

This method uses a high pass filter to pass high ordered frequencies effectively

removing low order components in the load current signal. The filtered frequencies

constitute the reference portion. This technique however, is susceptible to noise as

this is undesired [2].

34
3.8.1.2 Low pass filter method

This method is favored in terms of reference synthesis because unlike the high pass

filter method, the effects of noise in the filtered portion are suppressed. The desired

reference value is the harmonic component found in the load current. This is

determined by subtracting the low order frequency component found from

implementing a low pass filter from the total load current. This presents the harmonic

portion from the load current waveform. This technique however, introduces large

magnitude and phase errors [2].

3.8.2 Current/voltage reference calculation (discrete time or frequency


domain)
The techniques mentioned in 3.7.1 have many disadvantages to their use namely,

phase and magnitude errors as well as the effects of noise. The calculation of

harmonics therefore provides the most appropriate alternative. Two major techniques

are classified in either time domain or frequency domain [2].

3.8.2.1 Time domain approaches

The following seven subdivisions of time-domain approaches are mainly used for

three-phase systems except for the fictitious-power-compensation technique which

can be adopted for single- or three-phase systems. The time-domain methods are

mainly used to gain more speed or fewer calculations compared to the frequency-

domain methods [2].

35
3.8.2.1.1 Instantaneous reactive power algorithm

Instantaneous power theory determines the harmonic distortion from the

instantaneous power calculation in a three-phase system, which is the multiplication

of the instantaneous values of the currents and voltages [8].

⎛ p ⎞ ⎛ vα vβ ⎞ ⎛ iα ⎞
⎜ ⎟ = ⎜ −v ⎟ .⎜ ⎟
vα ⎠ ⎝ iβ ⎠ (3.4)
⎝q⎠ ⎝ β

The values of the instantaneous power p and q, which are the real and respective

imaginary powers, contain dc and ac components depending on the existing active,

reactive and distorted powers in the system. The dc components of p and q represent

the active and reactive powers and must be removed with high-pass filters to retain

only the ac signals. The ac components converted by an inverse transformation

matrix to the abc-frame represent the harmonic distortion, which is given as the

reference for the current controller. These processes are depicted in figure 3.18.

Figure 3.18 Calculations for the constant instantaneous supply power control strategy [8]

This operation takes place only under the assumption that the three-phase system is

balanced and that the voltage waveforms are purely sinusoidal. If, on the other hand,

this technique is applied to contaminated supplies, the resulting performance is

proven to be poor [2, 8].

36
3.8.2.1.2 Synchronous detection algorithm

This technique relies in the fact that the three phase currents are balanced. The

average power is calculated and divided equally between the three phases. The signal

is then synchronised relative to the mains voltage for each phase. This technique,

however easy to implement, suffers from the fact that it depends to a great extent on

the harmonics in the voltage signal. [2]

3.8.2.1.3 Constant active power algorithm

The instantaneous and average powers of the load are calculated. The active power

component of the system is controlled to keep the instantaneous real power constant,

while maintaining the imaginary power to zero. This technique performs fairly well

under ordinary conditions. However, the performance deteriorates when the supply is

contaminated. [2, 9]

3.8.2.1.4 Constant power factor algorithm

This technique forces the instantaneous current signal to track the voltage-reference

waveform. This implies that the power factor is fixed to unity and the system would

only be suitable for the combined system of VAR and current-harmonic

compensation. [2]

3.8.2.1.5 Fictitious power compensation algorithm

The system controller is designed to minimise the undesired component of power. In

this aspect, it is similar to the instantaneous-reactive-power algorithm but with a

different definition of power. This approach is suitable for both single and three

phase systems. However it involves a large amount of computation.[2]

37
3.8.2.1.6 Synchronous frame based algorithm

This algorithm relies on Park transformations to transform the three phase system

from a stationary reference frame into synchronously rotating direct, quadrature and

zero-sequence components. These can easily be analysed since the fundamental-

frequency component is transformed into DC quantities [34]. The active and reactive

components of the system are represented by the direct and quadrature components,

respectively. The high-order harmonics still remain in the signal; however they are

modulated at different frequencies. These are the undesired components to be

eliminated from the system and they represent the reference harmonic current. The

system is very stable since the controller deals mainly with DC quantities. The

computation is instantaneous but incurs time delays in filtering the DC quantities.

This method is applicable only to three-phase systems.[2]

3.8.2.1.7 Synchronous flux detection algorithm

This technique applies Park transformations to transfer the system into

synchronously rotating direct, quadrature and zero-sequence frames of reference.

However, it applies the transformation on the flux linkage of the filter inductance,

which is then controlled using the output voltages and currents in separate integral

loops. The presence of these integral loops incorporates time delays, which depend

on the frequency response of the special feed forward and feedback integrators.[2]

3.8.2.2 Frequency domain approaches

The frequency-domain methods are mainly identified with Fourier analysis,

rearranged in such a manner that this provides the result as fast as possible with a

reduced number of calculations, to allow a real-time implementation in DSP’s. Once

the Fourier transform is taken, the APF converter-switching function is computed to

produce the distortion canceling output. With this strategy the inverter switching

38
frequency must be more than twice the highest compensating harmonic frequency.

This strategy has a poorer dynamic response and it not as widely used. [2]

3.8.2.2.1 Conventional Fourier and FFT algorithms

Using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), the harmonic current can be reconstructed

by eliminating the fundamental component from the transformed current signal and

then the inverse transform is applied to obtain a time-domain signal. The main

disadvantage of this system is the accompanying time delay. This technique needs to

take samples of one complete cycle (or an integral number of cycles) to generate the

Fourier coefficients and it is therefore suitable for slowly varying load conditions.[2]

3.8.2.2.2 Sine multiplication technique

This method relies on the process of multiplying the current signal by a sine wave of

the fundamental frequency and integrating the result. This results in a loss of all the

high-order harmonics using a simple low-pass filter. The performance is still slow

(more than one complete mains cycle). This technique is similar to the Fourier

techniques presented above; it is, however, differently implemented.[2]

3.8.2.2.3 Modified Fourier series techniques

The principle behind this technique is that only the fundamental component of

current is calculated and this is used to separate the total harmonic signal from the

sampled load-current waveform. The practical implementation of this technique

relies on modifying the main Fourier series equations to generate a recursive formula

with a sliding window. This technique is adapted to use two different circular arrays

to store the components of the sine and cosine coefficients computed every sampling

sub cycle. The newly computed values of the desired coefficient are stored in place

of the old ones and the overall sums of the sine and cosine coefficients are updated

39
continuously. The computation time is much less than that of other techniques used

for single-phase applications. This technique is equally suitable for single- or three-

phase systems. [2]

3.8.2.3 Other algorithms

There are numerous optimization and estimation techniques, and all the utilities and

libraries for estimation can be used to perform this task. However some new methods

arise, such as the neural network and adaptive-estimation techniques which are fairly

accurate and have, of course, much better response. Unfortunately, presently

available control hardware is not suitable for implementation of these techniques.[2]

40
CHAPTER 4

4.0 SHUNT ACTIVE FILTER WITH PQ CONTROLLER

4.1 Introduction

The objective of shunt active filters is ultimately the same, the primary goal being to

compensate for current harmonics in the power system. A variety of active filters

also extend upon this initial goal to include reactive power compensation and as an

outcome of this power factor correction. The model shown in appendix D is a

simplified schematic of a three phase shunt active power filter implementation to a

power system network. This active filter model subtly compensates for current

harmonics and reduces of the total harmonic distortion.

4.2 Summary of active filter operation

Current source nonlinear loads such as a six-pulse thyristor converter require

harmonics from the generator. Although the demand for current harmonics may only

be of a few orders above the fundamental, the generator upstream is compelled to

supply this current. This causes the generator to operate at frequencies above the

nominal 50Hz or 60Hz and in doing so, also creates a negative phase-sequence

component which is undesirable.

A shunt active filter is considered a current source because it injects non-sinusoidal

current through the parallel branch of the network in order to compensate for the

current harmonic demand of the nonlinear load. The role of the active filter controller

is to sense and monitor the load current and to appropriately determine the correct

41
reference harmonic current for the inverter. Once the correct reference harmonic

content is determined; this reference current is fed through a suitable current

controller which then is sent to the inverter for injection into the network. Appendix

D shows the model of the three phase four wire shunt active power filter using a

conventional three leg converter.

4.3 Critical component operation

4.3.1 DC voltage regulator

The dc voltage regulator is designed to automatically maintain a constant voltage

level. It supervises the dc capacitor voltages and provides two control signals, Ploss

and ε . The capacitor voltages of C1 and C2 vary by certain conditions caused by the

shape of the current reference and the hysteresis bandwidth. If the current references

are assumed to be composed from zero-sequence components, the line currents will

return through the neutral wire. For a split capacitor inverter topology as shown in

figure D.1, the currents can flow in both directions through the switches and

capacitors. Therefore, variations in the capacitor voltages can also be caused by a

zero-sequence current reference as shown in Table 4.1 [6].

di fk
i fk > 0 and <0 Increase the voltage in C1
dt
di fk
i fk < 0 and <0 Decrease the voltage in C1
dt
di fk
i fk < 0 and >0 Increase the voltage in C2
dt
di fk
i fk > 0 and >0 Decrease the voltage in C2
dt

Table 4.1 Variation conditions for the capacitor voltage Vc1 and Vc2

42
Figure 4.1 DC voltage regulator schematic[6]

The inputs to the dc voltage regulator are the two capacitor voltages and an internal

fixed reference voltage. The capacitor voltage difference from the reference input is

filtered using a lower pass filter with a cutoff frequency at 20 Hz to render it

insensitive to the fundamental frequency voltage variations which appear when the

active filter compensates the fundamental zero sequence current of the load. The

voltage is then amplified using a proportional-integral (PI) controller which outputs

signal Ploss. Ploss aims to compensate for losses in the PWM converter which tends to

discharge the dc capacitors and thus neutralise the dc bus voltage variations. This

gives rise to a negative feedback loop.

The second output from the dc voltage regulator is the dynamic offset level. This

offset level is dynamic because it changes accordingly as to ensure that the difference

in dc capacitor voltages (Vc2 − Vc1 ) stays within an acceptable tolerance limit. The

capacitor voltage difference is filtered and then sent along with the reference voltage

to a limiting function which is used to determine the appropriate limits.

43
The limit function must adhere to the following limits:

⎧ε = −1 ⇔ ΔV < −0.05Vref

⎪ ΔV (4.1)
⎨ε = ⇔ − 0.05Vref ≤ ΔV ≤ 0.05Vref
⎪ 0.05Vref
⎪ε = 1 ⇔ ΔV > 0.05Vref

4.3.2 Active Filter Controller

4.3.2.1 Positive-sequence voltage detector

The active filter controller suitably determines reference currents by integration of an

appropriate control theory. This model incorporates the PQ theory. The input to the

controller monitors the load current waveform and the source voltage waveform and

calculates power based upon these parameters. Since the shunt active filter is

designed predominantly for current harmonic mitigation, the harmonics present in

the power waveform can be assumed to be attributed solely by the current harmonics

demanded by the nonlinear load. If one assumes that the voltage waveform is

perfectly sinusoidal and free from all harmonics then this condition becomes true. If

the three phase voltage input to the controller is unbalanced or high distorted, then

the reference currents calculated would not completely filter the current harmonics

demanded by the nonlinear load. This situation gives rise for the need of a positive

sequence voltage detector.

The positive sequence voltage detector shown in figure 4.2 derives the positive

sequence fundamental signal from a three phase voltage signal carried by the power

line. The PLL control circuit tracks the positive sequence voltage at the fundamental

frequency of highly distorted and unbalanced three phase signals. The synchronizing

circuit determines accurately the fundamental frequency of the system voltage and

44
phase angle of the measured signals which may be unbalanced and contain

harmonics.

The fundamental frequency is used as input to a sine wave generator that produces

three auxiliary signals namely ( i 'a , i 'b , i 'c ) to be used as ‘fundamental positive

sequence currents’ along the detector [6]. These currents together with the line

voltages are then inputs to a Clarke α − β − 0 transformation algorithm and power

calculation. Equation 4.2 shows the transformation matrix which converts the phase

voltages and phase currents into the appropriate reference frame. Equation 4.3

determines the power values composed from the fundamental positive sequence

voltage and auxiliary currents.

The α − β voltage reference box of figure 4.2 calculates the alpha and beta reference

voltages given by equation 4.4. Finally, the a-b-c instantaneous values of the

fundamental positive sequence voltage are determined by the α − β − 0 inverse

transformation box, without errors in the amplitude or phase angle as shown in

equation 4.5. The voltages calculated from equation 8 are now considered as input to

the main control circuit.

Thus the purpose of the positive sequence voltage detector is justified as the active

filter controller compensates the load current as if it were connected directly to a

perfectly balanced sinusoidal voltage source, irrelevant if the source is in fact

unbalanced or highly distorted [6]:

45
⎛ 1 1 1 ⎞
⎜ 2 2 2 ⎟⎟ v
⎛ v0 ⎞ ⎜ ⎛ a⎞
⎜ ⎟ 2⎜ −1 −1 ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎜ vα ⎟ = 3 ⎜ 1
2
. vb
2 ⎟ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎜v ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ vc ⎠
⎝ β⎠ ⎜ 3 − 3⎟
⎜ 0 ⎟
⎝ 2 2 ⎠ (4.2)

⎛ 1 1 1 ⎞
⎜ 2 2 2 ⎟⎟ i
⎛ i0 ⎞ ⎜ ⎛ a⎞
⎜ ⎟ 2⎜ −1 −1 ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎜ iα ⎟ = 3 ⎜ 1
2
. ib
2 ⎟ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎜i ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ic ⎠
⎝ β⎠ ⎜ 3 − 3⎟
⎜ 0 ⎟
⎝ 2 2 ⎠

⎛ p0 ⎞ ⎛ v0 0 0 ⎞ ⎛ i0 ⎞
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎜ p ⎟=⎜ 0 vα vβ ⎟ . ⎜ iα ⎟ (4.3)
⎜ q⎟ ⎜0 − vβ vα ⎟⎠ ⎜⎝ iβ ⎟⎠
⎝ ⎠ ⎝

⎛ v 'α ⎞ 1 ⎛ i 'α i 'β ⎞ ⎛ p ' ⎞ (4.4)


⎜ ⎟= 2 .⎜ ⎟ .⎜ ⎟
⎝ v 'β ⎠ i 'α + i 'β
2
⎝ i 'β −i 'α ⎠ ⎜⎝ q ' ⎟⎠

⎛ ⎞
⎜ 1 0 ⎟
⎛ v 'a ⎞ ⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟ 2 ⎜ −1 3 ⎟ ⎛ v 'α ⎞ (4.5)
⎜ v 'b ⎟ = 3 ⎜ 2 .⎜ ⎟
2 ⎟ ⎝ v 'β ⎠
⎜v' ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ c⎠
⎜ −1 3⎟
⎜ − ⎟
⎝ 2 2 ⎠

46
Figure 4.2 Block diagram of the fundamental positive sequence voltage detector [6]

4.3.2.2 The PQ Theory

The p-q theory formally known as “The Generalized Theory of the Instantaneous

Reactive Power in Three-Phase Circuit” was first developed by H. Akagi in 1983.

[10] It is based in instantaneous values in three phase power systems with or without

neutral wire, and is valid for steady state or transitory operations, as well as for

generic voltage and current waveforms. The p-q theory consists of an algebraic

transformation known as a Clarke transformation of the three phase input voltages

and the load harmonic currents in the a-b-c coordinates to the α − β − 0 reference

frame followed by the calculation of the real and reactive instantaneous power

components.

From equation (4.3), equation (4.6) shows how expanding the matrices give the

algebraic formula for determining the instantaneous zero sequence power,

instantaneous real power and the instantaneous imaginary power [10].

p0 = v0 × i0
p = vα × iα + vβ × iβ (4.6)
q = vα × iβ − vβ × iα

Figure 4.3 shows a diagram of the interactions of each of the power components

within the power system and how each relates to one another.

47
p0 is the average value of the instantaneous zero sequence power. This corresponds

to the power which is transferred from the power supply to the load through the zero

sequence components of voltage and current.

~
p0 corresponds to the alternating power of the instantaneous zero sequence power.

This relates to the exchanged power between the power supply and the load through

the zero sequence components of voltage and current. The zero sequence power only

exists in three phase systems with neutral wire.

p is the mean value of the instantaneous real power. This corresponds to the energy

per unit time unity which is transferred from the power supply to the load.

~
p is alternating value of the instantaneous real power. This corresponds to power

which is exchanged between the power supply to the load.

q is the instantaneous imaginary power. This corresponds to the power that is

exchanged between the phases of the load. This component is not constructive to the

system and is accountable for the undesirable current which circulate between the

system phases. The reactive power does not transfer power from the supply to the

load nor does it exchange power.

48
Figure 4.3 Power components of the p-q theory in alpha-beta-0 coordinates [10]

From figure 4.3, the only component of the power obtained through the p-q theory

that is desirable and constructive is the average real power and the average zero

sequence power. This is because power is transferred from the supply to the load.

The other components of power are less desirable and this can be compensated by

the shunt active filter. [10]

The control diagram for the shunt active filter controller is shown in figure 4.4. An

important component to note is the high pass filter with cut off frequency of 50Hz.

This filter receives the instantaneous real power from equation 4.3 and filters all

frequencies of power greater than the fundamental. The output waveform is thus the

harmonic power which is recognized as containing only current harmonics. This is

justified as once can assume a perfectly sinusoidal voltage source by virtue of the

integrated positive sequence voltage detector.

− vβ ⎞ ⎛⎜ − p + Δ p ⎞⎟
~
⎛ i *cα ⎞ 1 ⎛ vα
⎜ ⎟= 2 ⎜ ⎟.
⎜ i * ⎟ v + v 2 .⎜ v vα ⎟⎠ ⎜ − q ⎟
(4.7)
⎝ cβ ⎠ α β ⎝ β ⎝ ⎠

49
⎛ 1 ⎞
⎜ 1 0 ⎟
⎜ 2 ⎟ ⎛ −i ⎞
⎛ i *ca ⎞ (4.8)
2⎜ 3 ⎟⎜
0
⎜ ⎟ 1 −1 ⎟
⎜ i *cb ⎟ = ⎜ ⎟ . ⎜ i *0α ⎟
⎜i* ⎟ 3⎜ 2 2 2 ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ cc ⎠ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ i *cβ ⎠
1 −1 − 3
⎜⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2 2 2 ⎟⎠

The harmonic power output from the high pass filter together with the reactive power

is used in equation 4.7 to determine the alpha and beta references of the currents.

These currents are then inputs to equation 4.8 where the instantaneous current

references to the PWM current control are determined.

Figure 4.4 PQ theory control [6]

4.3.3 Dynamic hysteresis band PWM controller

Current control is implemented through feedback modulation of a dynamic hysteresis

band PWM controller. The shunt line current tracks the reference current within a

hysteresis band. By comparing the reference currents calculated by the controller

with the measured values of compensation currents, the command signals for the

inverter semiconductor switches can be produced.

50
Figure 4.6 illustrates the principle of the dynamic hysteresis current controller

technique. If the shunt line current exceeds the maximum limit of the hysteresis

band, the upper switch of the inverter arm is turned off and the lower switch is turned

on. As a result, the current starts to decay. If the current crosses the minimum limit of

the hysteresis band, the lower switch of the inverter arm is turned off and the upper

switch is turned on. As a result, the current gets back into the hysteresis band. Hence,

the shunt line current is forced to track the reference current with the hysteresis band.

ε S1

S2
i fa
i fb S3
i fc
S4
i *ca
S5
i *cb
i *cc S6

Figure 4.5 Hysteresis controller [6]

The signal ε actuates as a dynamic offset level that is added to both hysteresis band

limits in the PWM current control as shown in figure 4.5. The maximum and

minimum limits are determined by equation 4.9 [6].

⎧⎪ Upper hysteresis band limit =i*ck + Δ(1 + ε )


⎨ [4.9]
⎪⎩Lower hysteresis band limit =i ck − Δ(1 − ε )
*

where i*ck (k = a, b, c)is the instantaneous current reference &


is a fixed semi-bandwidth of the hysteresis control

51
Thus, the signal ε shifts the hysteresis band to change the switching times such that

⎧ε > 0 ⇒ rises VC1 and lowers VC 2 [4.10]



⎩ε < 0 ⇒ rises VC 2 and lowers VC1

Figure 4.6 Hysteresis band PWM control [11]

52
4.3.4 Other components

Appendix D shows an inductive filter and RC high pass filter placed at the inverter

output. The inductive filter is designed to limit the ripple of the compensation

currents whilst the RC high pass filter is set in the active filter output to filter the

inverter commutation frequencies.

Low power active filters are installed close to each problematic load, avoiding the

circulation of current harmonics, reactive currents and neutral currents through the

utility power lines. This solution reduces the power lines losses and voltage drops,

and avoids voltage distortions at the load terminals.

53
CHAPTER 5

5.0 TWO BUS NETWORK MODEL SIMULATION

5.1 Introduction

Simulation is a powerful way to reduce development time and ensure the proper

fulfillment of critical steps. In this project, simulations were performed, which

allowed the study of its behavior under different operation conditions, and permitted

the tuning of some controller parameters together with the optimization of the active

filter component values. Matlab/Simulink and the Power System Blockset were used

as simulation tools in this development, as it offered an integrated environment

between designing control algorithms and the electrical network models.

5.2 Simulation Component Comparison

Each component of the shunt active filter controller was simulated and tested. Major

simulated block models together with accompanying waveforms were compared

against those found in the key IEEE transaction paper [6].

54
5.2.1 DC voltage regulator

The block model for the dc voltage regulator is shown in figure 5.1.

Figure 5.1 Simulated DC voltage regulator circuit

The reference voltage is equal to 600V. Vdc1 and Vdc2 are ‘from tags’ that monitor the

capacitor voltage value and are inputs to the dc voltage regulator. The limit function

obeys equation 4.1 and is shown in figure 5.2 along with the MATLAB code for the

function which is shown in Appendix F.

Figure 5.2 DC voltage regulator limit function

The parameter values for the PI control such as the proportional gain (Kp) and

integral gain (Ki) were achieved through a trial and error approach until the system

maintained stability. These values were Kp = 0.0.1 and Ki = 50.

55
5.2.2 Active Filter Controller

5.2.2.1 Positive Sequence Voltage Detector

The block model for the positive sequence voltage detector is shown in figure 5.3.

The input is a three phase unbalanced or high distorted voltage and the output gives a

purely sinusoidal voltage, free from harmonics which is used as the input to the p-q

controller.

Figure 5.3 Positive voltage sequence detector model

5.2.2.1.1 Phase Locked Loop (PLL) and Sine Generator Model

The PLL block model combined with the sine generator model is shown in figure

5.4. The input is unbalanced or highly distorted three phase voltages and the output is

three phase auxiliary currents used as ‘fundamental positive sequence signals’ along

⎡ K ⎤
the detector. The normalized inputs for the PI controller ⎢G ( s ) = K p + i ⎥ are Kp =
⎣ s ⎦

0.98, Ki = 80.

56
Figure 5.4 PLL and sine generator

The PLL and sine generator model shown in figure 5.4 can be verified by figure 5.5

taken from [12].

ia (ω t ) ωt ia1
Vab sin(ω t ) sin(ω t − π / 2)
X
P3φ ω 1 ib1
∑ sin(ω t − π / 2 − 2π / 3)
s
Vcb
X ic1
sin(ω t + 2π / 3) sin(ω t − π / 2 + 2π / 3)
ic (ω t )

Figure 5.5 Synchronising PLL circuit [12]

Since the current harmonic nonlinear load used for this simulation are balanced and

thus demands current harmonics only, the voltage will remain sinusoidal. To test and

verify that the model is correct, three phase load distorted current waveforms are

used at the input as a substitute.

57
Figure 5.6 Waveforms of Iα, Iβ and load current distortion

Figure 5.6 shows the three phase distorted nonlinear load input to the positive

sequence detector. The output shows Iα and I β perfectly sinusoidal. Thus the

positive sequence voltage detector had been modeled and is shown through

waveforms that the model is functioning as desired.

58
5.2.2.2 PQ Theory model

Appendix E shows the complete PQ theory circuit schematic found in the IEEE

transaction paper [6]. The total simulated model of the PQ theory is shown in figure

5.7.

Figure 5.7 Total PQ theory model

The inputs to the PQ controller are the measured load currents from the nonlinear

load and the α − β voltage reference from the positive sequence voltage detector.

The outputs are the three phase reference currents to be sent to the inverter for

injection. A closer analysis of the power calculation block diagram is shown in figure

5.8. The three phase harmonic load currents are converted into the α − β current

reference using equation 4.2 and is modeled by figure 5.9. Figure 5.8 used equation

4.3 to define the instantaneous, imaginary and zero sequence power.

59
Figure 5.8 Power calculation

Figure 5.9 Clarke transformation

The waveforms showed in figures 5.10 and 5.11 represent the input voltage and load

current respectively to the PQ controller.

Figure 5.10 Vα, Vβ to PQ controller

60
Figure 5.11 Input harmonic load current

The waveform of the instantaneous power shown in figure 5.12 comprises of current

harmonics. This is because of the implementation of the positive sequence voltage

detector creating a perfectly harmonic free sinusoidal voltage.

Figure 5.12 Power waveform

61
The inverse power transformation block model shown in figure 5.13 gives the

α − β current reference calculations.

Figure 5.13 α-β current reference calculations

Using the single second order high pass filter, the waveform from the inverse power

transformation is shown in figure 5.14.

Figure 5.14 Reference alpha-beta current

The inverse current reference transformation block model shown in figure 5.15 gives

the phase current reference calculations.

62
Figure 5.15 Alpha-Beta-0 to phase current compensation

The waveform from the inverse current transformation is shown in figure 5.16. These

three phase currents are then sent to the filter for injection through the shunt branch

to the neutralise the load harmonic current.

Figure 5.16 Three phase compensation current

63
The IEEE transaction paper of [4] shows a subtle difference between the three phase

compensation currents. This can be attributed to differences in the parameter values

between some components of the controller and system network which were

assumed given these were not present in the paper.

Figure 5.17 IEEE transaction paper comparisons – compensation currents [6]

64
5.2.2.3 Dynamic hysteresis PWM current converter model

The top stage level of the dynamic hysteresis current PWM converter is shown in

figure 5.18. The inputs are the reference currents from the PQ controller, the

dynamic offset level, the bandwidth and the shunt line current. The outputs are

switching signals used to control the inverter switches.

Figure 5.18 Top stage view

Within each of the three hysteresis control blocks, a series of functions are set in

order to appropriately control each switch of the inverter. Equation 4.9 is modeled

and the calculated process behind each hysteresis control block together with the

embedded MATLAB function code is shown in figure 5.19 and Appendix G

respectively.

65
Figure 5.19 Hysteresis control model

5.2.3 Inverter Injection

Figure 5.20 shows the inverter portion of the active filter responsible for injecting the

compensation current in the parallel branch to supplement the current harmonic load

demanded from by the source. Vdc1 and Vdc2 are two dc capacitors used to provide

the necessary voltage to power the inverter. This voltage is regulated by the dc

voltage regulator. The shunt inverter receives signals sent from the dynamic

hysteresis PWM current controller and outputs three phase compensation currents.

66
Figure 5.20 Shunt inverter

67
5.2.4 System Modeling

Figure 5.21 shows the shunt system connected into the existing power system

network. The connected lines before the active filter are from the generator and the

connected line after the filter connects to the nonlinear load. The system consists of

the shunt inverter along with series commutation inductance of 2.5 millihenries. A

tuned high pass filter is also connected to filter the inverter commutation frequencies.

The high pass filter RC parameters are 1 ohm and 30 microfarads.

Figure 5.21 Shunt system

68
CHAPTER 6
6.0 MODEL VERIFICATION – CASE STUDIES

6.1 Introduction

A three phase six pulse current source converter and a three phase diode rectifier are

used independently to verify the functionality of the active filter in its ability to

compensate for current harmonics.

6.2 Verification Procedure – six pulse thyristor converter

6.2.1 Harmonic load modeling

Figure 6.1 shows the three phase six pulse current source converter used to model the

current harmonic nonlinear load. The thyristor converter receives switching signals

from the synchronized six pulse generator and outputs a controlled dc waveform due

to the alpha angle set by the generator. Values for the α angle = 30 degrees, R = 25.5

ohms and the output current is 8.12A.

Figure 6.1 Three phase 6 pulse current source converter

69
The output current from the thyristor converter is shown in figure 6.2.

Figure 6.2 Output current waveform

6.2.2 Compensation results

Figure 6.3 shows the effect of current harmonics due to the nonlinear load to the

power system network. Since a balanced nonlinear load is connected across three

phases, the total harmonic distortion (THD) over the entire system will be the same

across a particular phase. Without the shunt active filter connected, the THD due to

the three phase thyristor converter is 32.65%.

Figure 6.3 THD before active filter

70
Figure 6.4 THD reduction after active filter

Figure 6.4 shows the shunt system connected into the power system network. With

the shunt active filter connected, the THD due to the three phase thyristor converter

is 2.234%. This value shows a 30.416% compensation of the active filter compared

to the THD found in figure 6.3. Thus, the filter is compensating as desired.

6.2.3 Source Waveforms

Figures 6.5 and 6.6 show the three phase source current waveform before

compensation and after compensation respectively.

71
Figure 6.5 Source current waveforms before compensation

Figure 6.6 Source current waveforms after compensation

72
6.3 Verification Procedure – Three phase diode rectifier

6.3.1 Harmonic load modeling

Figure 6.7 shows the harmonic load model of the diode rectifier with an RL load.

The connection of the diode presents a balanced load as the rectifier was connected

across all three phases to ground. The commutation inductance = 3 mH, Rdc =20

ohms and Ldc = 300 mH.

Figure 6.7 Single phase diode rectifier

Figure 6.8 shows the diode rectifier output voltage and current

Figure 6.8 Single phase diode rectifier output voltage and current

73
6.3.2 Compensation Results

Figure 6.9 shows the uncompensated power system network with the three phase

diode rectifier as load. The THD of the system is 21.52%. Figure 6.10 shows the

power system when the shunt active filter was implemented. The THD was brought

down to 2.106%.

Figure 6.9 Uncompensated THD system

Figure 6.10 Compensated THD system

74
6.3.3 Source Waveforms

Figures 6.11 and 6.12 showed the uncompensated and compensated source current

waveform for the diode rectifier.

Figure 6.11 Uncompensated phase source current

Figure 6.12 Diode rectifier compensated waveform

75
6.4 Discussion

The waveform shown in figures 6.13 is the IEEE paper waveform of the source

current found in [6]. The configuration of the system model from the paper included

a diode bridge connected at t = 30ms from b-phase and neutral, two controlled

(thyristor) bridges connected after t = 40ms across all phases and a-phase and neutral

respectively. For simplicity, and to avoid increased complications due to unbalanced

loads; this project incorporated the two loads used in the case studies for separate

testing. Thus, figures 6.6 and 6.7 concur with the sinusoidal relationship of figure

6.13.

Figure 6.13 Computed source and current waveforms [6]

From sections 6.2.2 and 6.3.2, the THD was reduced to 2.234% and 2.106%

respectively. The active filter does not totally filter all harmonics, such as reducing

the THD to 0% for several reasons.

An inverter is a power electronics device which uses several switches at appropriate

times to shape the output waveforms as desired. This short abrupt switching, self

generates internal harmonics and partially contributes to the small THD.

76
Another source of harmonics comes from efficiency issues from the positive

sequence voltage detector which could have propagated throughout the system. If

this is true, harmonics from the input voltage source would contribute to inaccurate

compensation and this could also partially contribute to the small THD.

77
CHAPTER 7

7.0 CONCLUSION

7.1 Discussion

This project investigated the analysis and simulation of a shunt active power filter.

The project simulated results showed that the shunt active power filter model

proposed was suited for use in current harmonic compensation on any single bus on a

power system network. One of the areas of strength for this project includes the

implementation of a positive sequence voltage detector. This allows the filter to

become more versatile as it can be installed in areas of high voltage distortion or

unbalanced input signals. The filter, given these input conditions has the ability to

extract the positive sequence component of the input voltage as it compensates for

current harmonics. Thus, the filter acts as if it was connected to a perfectly sinusoidal

input.

Another major strength of this shunt active power filter is the results achieved under

the two case study scenarios. For each of the given nonlinear loads, the active filter

reduced the total harmonic distortion to below 5%. The strength is the fact that the

internal harmonics generated by the inverter remained minimal. This is a definite

advantage and adds to the positive outcome to the overall success of the

compensation.

Areas of weakness in this project include the efficiency of the major high pass filter,

which is responsible for filtering the harmonic component from the real power

78
waveform. In addition, the hysteresis band PWM current controller proves a likely

source of errors due to the complexity.

7.2 Future Implications

For future research, once might consider designing a higher order high pass filter for

within the controller. This filter is responsible for filtering out the harmonic

component of the real power. As all filters are not ideal, and thus lack in their ability

to filter every component as required, an element of error is introduced in the

calculation of the reference currents and thus compensation currents. This error is

such that the compensation currents will not exactly match the load harmonic

currents and thus harmonic currents will remain in the system. Although the total

harmonic distortion will be reduced, designing a filter of a higher order will prove

valuable in increasing the filters accuracy and thus efficiency.

The determination of the PI controller values is also another area of interest for

future consideration. These values relate to the compensation of the DC voltage

regulator maintaining a regulated voltage across the two capacitors such that it will

provide voltage to power the inverter. In general the determination of these values is

very cumbersome and for this project a trial and error approach was sustained. These

values are accurate to the extent of observing output waveforms from the controller

and adjusting the parameters accordingly to achieve a plateau curve at time increases.

79
CHAPTER 8

8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] F. Z. Peng, "Harmonic sources and filtering approaches," Industry


Applications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 7, pp. 18-25, 2001.
[2] M. El-Habrouk, M. K. Darwish, and P. Mehta, "Active power filters: a
review," Electric Power Applications, IEE Proceedings-, vol. 147, pp. 403-
413, 2000.
[3] C. Y. Hsu and H. Y. Wu, "A new single-phase active power filter with
reduced energy-storage capacity," Electric Power Applications, IEE
Proceedings-, vol. 143, pp. 25-30, 1996.
[4] H. Akagi, "New trends in active filters for power conditioning," Industry
Applications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 32, pp. 1312-1322, 1996.
[5] V. B. Bhavaraju and P. Enjeti, "A fast active power filter to correct line
voltage sags," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 41, pp. 333-
338, 1994.
[6] M. Aredes, J. Hafner, and K. Heumann, "Three-phase four-wire shunt active
filter control strategies," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 12,
pp. 311-318, 1997.
[7] P. S. Sensarma, K. R. Padiyar, and V. Ramanarayanan, "A comparative study
of harmonic filtering strategies for a shunt active filter," 2000, pp. 2509-2516
vol.4.
[8] J. Afonso, C. Couto, and J. Martins, "Active Filters with Control Based on
the p-q Theory," IEEE Industrial Electronics Society Newsletter, vol. 47, pp.
5-10, September 2000.
[9] A. Cavallini and G. C. Montanari, "Compensation strategies for shunt active-
filter control," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 9, pp. 587-593,
1994.
[10] J. Afonso, H. Silva, and J. Martins, "Active Filters for Power Quality
Improvement," IEEE Power Technology, pp. 10-13, September 2001.
[11] MathWorks, "Simulink - Model-Based and System-Based Design Modelling,
Simulation, Implementation," 5 ed, 2002.
[12] L. F. C. Monteiro, M. Aredes, and J. A. Moor Neto, "A control strategy for
unified power quality conditioner," 2003, pp. 391-396 vol. 1.
[13] J. Technologies, "Guide to Harmonics with AC variable Frequency Drives."
vol. 2006 Illinois, 2006.

80
APPENDICES

81
Appendix A – Gantt Chart

Figure A.1 Gantt chart

82
Figure A.2 Gantt chart (continued)

83
Appendix B – Filter combinations

Figure B.5 Parallel combination of parallel-


active and parallel-passive filters for
current-source nonlinear loads.
Figure B.1 Basic parallel-passive filter for
current-source nonlinear loads.

Figure B.6 Series combination of series-


active and series-passive filters for voltage-
source nonlinear loads.

Figure B.2 Basic series-passive filter for


voltage-source nonlinear loads.

Figure B.7 Hybrid of series-active and


parallel-passive filters for current-source
nonlinear loads

Figure B.3 Basic parallel-active filter for


current-source nonlinear loads.
Figure B.8 Hybrid of parallel-active and
series-passive filters for voltage-source
nonlinear loads

Figure B.4 Basic series-active filter for


voltage-source nonlinear loads.
Figure B.9 Series combination of parallel-
passive and parallel-active filters for
current-source nonlinear loads

84
Figure B.14 Combined system of parallel-
Figure B.10 Parallel combination of series- passive and series-passive filters for
passive and series-active filters for voltage- voltage-source nonlinear loads.
source nonlinear loads.

Figure B.15 Circuit I to reduce


Figure B.11 Combined system of series- fundamental voltage of parallel-active
active and parallel-active filters for filter.
current-source nonlinear loads.

Figure B.16 Circuit I to reduce


Figure B.12 Combined system of series- fundamental current of series-active filter.
active and parallel-active filters for voltage-
source nonlinear loads

Figure B.17 Circuit II to reduce


Figure B.13 Combined system of series- fundamental voltage of parallel-active
passive and parallel-passive filters for filter.
current-source nonlinear loads.

Figure B.18 Circuit II to reduce


fundamental current of series-active filter.

85
Figure B.19 Circuit III to reduce
fundamental voltage of parallel-active
filter.

Figure B.20 Circuit III to reduce


fundamental current of series-active filter.

Figure B.21 Circuit IV to reduce


fundamental voltage of parallel-active
filter.

Figure B.22 Circuit IV to reduce


fundamental current of series-active filter.

86
Appendix C – Summary and Comparison of Filters

Operating principle/ Circuit design and Features, VA rating/system cost


Fig. Suited nonlinear control scheme performance, and
loads consideration
A.1 Harmonic sink/CSNL Low-impedance Resonance with and Var+harmonic current i.e.
circuit or series- influenced by the V*(IVAR+ILh) /cheapest
resonant circuit source impedance
A.2 Harmonic dam / High-impedance No resonance whit Fundamental+harmonic
VSNL circuit or parallel and no bad influence voltage /i.e.I*(Vdf +Vlh)
resonance circuit by the source Cheapest
A.3 Current source/ CSNL PAF injects current Ideal performance to V*Ilh / expensive
so that Ic =Ilh CSNL
A.4 Voltage source SAF produces Ideal performance to I*VLh / expensive
/VSNL voltage Vc= -VLh VSNL
A.5 Current source+ PAF: low-order Good performance, PAF:V*ILh(5,7)
harmonic sink / CSNL harmonic compensation role PPF:V*(Ivar+ILh(11,13,..))/faily
compensation and sharing, dynamic var expensive
resonance damping; compensation possible
PPF: high-order
harmonic
compensation
A.6 Voltage source+ SAF: low-order Good performance, SAF:I*VLh(5,7)
harmonic dam / harmonic compensation role PPF:I*(Vdf+VLh(11,13,..))/fairly
VSNL compensation and sharing, dynamic expensive
damping; voltage regulation
SPF: high-order possible
harmonic
compensation
A.7 SAF: harmonic SAF: blocking Ideal performance, SAF: I*ILh ZF,minimize VA
isolation harmonic current dynamic voltage rating, PPF: V*(IVar+ILh)
FPF: harmonic PPF: low-impedance regulation possible /minimized system cost
compensation / CSNL circuit
A.8 PAF: harmonic PAF: eliminate Ideal performance, PAF:V*Ih(upstream+adjacent) ,
isolation upstream and dynamic VAR SPF:I*(Vf+VLh) / minimized
SPF: harmonic adjacent harmonics so compensation possible system cost
blocking /VSNL that no harmonics by PAF
appear at the terminal
voltage VT
SPF: high impedance
circuit
A.9 PAF: enhancing PPF PAF: is controlled so Ideal performance to PAF:(IVar+ILh)*ILh ZF ,
and resonance that load-harmonic CSNL, source minimized VA,
damping current is absorbed harmonic voltage will PPF: V*(Ivar+Ilh)/ minimized
PPF: harmonic completely by the appear at the terminal system cost
compensation/CSNL PPF VT
PPF: low-impedance
circuit
A.10 SAF: enhancing SPF SAF: helping to block Ideal performance to SAF: VLhVLh/ZD, minimized
SAF: harmonic harmonic current, VSNL/no harmonic VA
blocking/ Vc= -Vlh resonance SPF:I*(Vf+VLh) / minimized
VSNL SPF:high- impedance system cost
circuit

A.11 SAF: harmonic SAF: harmonic Ideal performance to SAF: I*VSh ,


isolation isolation, source CSNL, dynamic PAF: V*(Ivar+ILh)/
PAF: harmonic harmonic voltage regulation and most expensive
compensation / CSNL compensation, and var compensation
voltage regulation, possible
PAF:load-harmonic
compen.
A.12 SAF: harmonic SAF: load-harmonic Ideal performance to , SAF: I*VLh ,
compen. compensation, dynamic var PAF: V*Ih(upstream/adjacent) /most
PAF: harmonic PAF: shunt to compensation possible expensive
shunting / VSNL upstream and
adjacent harmonics

Table C.2A Comparison of filters

87
A.13 SPF: harmonic SPF: for harmonic Better performance SPF I*VSh ,
isolation isolation and source than PPF alone, VT PAF: V*(Ivar+ILh)/ cheap
PPF: harmonic harmonic becomes sinusoidal
compensation / CSNL compensation; even when VSh exists
PPF: for load-
harmonic
compensation
A.14 SPF: harmonic SPF: load-harmonic Make the terminal SPF: I*VLh ,
compen. compensation; voltage VT more PPF: V*Ih(upstream/adjacent) / cheap
PPF: harmonic PPF: provides shunt sinusoidal when
shunting/ VSNL to adjacent harmonic source and adjacent
loads harmonic exist
A.15 Use LC circuits to Fundamental voltage An optimum design is Fig.A.15:(VXL
A.17 reduce fundamental of the PAF can be desirable to minimize /(XC+XL)+ILhXC)*ILh
A.19 voltage applied on reduced to XL the total VA rating of Fig.A.17:(VXL
A.21 PAF / CSNL /(XC+XL) in Fig.A.15, PAF and total system /(XP+XL)+ILhXP)*ILh
to XL/(XP+XL) in cost. Dynamic var Fig. A.19:ILhXP*(ILh+V/XP)
Fig.A.17, and to zero compensation not Fig. A.21:ILhXC*(ILh+V/XC)
in Fig. A.19 and possible.
A.21. On the other
hand, harmonic
current injected by
the PAF will cause
harmonic drop over
XC or XP.
A.16 Use LC circuit to Fundamental current An optimum design is Fig.A.16:(IXL /(XC+XL)+VLh
A.18 reduce fundamental of the SAF can be desirable to minimize /XL)*VLh
A.20 current flowing reduced to XL the total VA rating of Fig.A.18:(VXL /(XS+XL)+VLh /
A.22 through SAF/ VSNL /(XC+XL) in Fig.A.16, SAF and total system XS)*ILh
to XL/(XC+XL) in cost. Dynamic voltage Fig. A.20:VLh / XS*(VLh+IXS)
Fig.A.18, and to zero regulation not Fig. A.22:VLh /XL*(VLh+IXL)
in Fig. A.20 and possible.
A.22. On the other
hand, harmonic
voltage produced by
the SAF will cause
harmonic current over
XC or XP.

Table C.3A (continued) Comparison of filters

88
Appendix D – Shunt Active Filter System

Figure D.1 Shunt active filter system

89
Appendix E – PQ Theory Controller

Figure E.1 PQ theory controller

90
Appendix F – DC Voltage Regulator MATLAB Code

function y = fcn(Vc, Vref, e)


% This block supports an embeddable subset of the MATLAB language.
% See the help menu for details.

if Vc< (-0.05 * Vref)


y=-1;

elseif Vc > (0.05 * Vref)


y=1;

else
y=e;
end

91
Appendix G – Dynamic Hysteresis PWM Current Controller MATLAB Code

function y = fcn(ifr, IrMax, IrMin, u3)

% This block supports an embeddable subset of the MATLAB language.


% See the help menu for details.
if ifr >= IrMax
y=1;

elseif ifr <= IrMin


y=0;

else
y=u3;
end

92

Potrebbero piacerti anche