Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi obtained near Irvine,

California




Nick Kelley
with Allison Moreno









Drs. Adam Martiny and Anthony Amend
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 2


Abstract
The carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus (C:N:P) ratios of 43 terrestrial fungal isolates
acquired near Irvine, California, were analyzed and compared to the Redfield ratio (106:16:1)
and global soil microbial biomass (60:7:1). To evaluate level of homeostasis or plasticity (non-
homeostasis), three of the isolates (Davidiella, Mucor flavus, Helotiales) were grown in malt-
yeast extract treatments with modified nutrient ratios. Carbon and nitrogen levels were measured
using combustion analysis. Soluble organic phosphorus was extracted using heated HCL and
analyzed with a molybdenum reagent indicator and spectrophotometer. The average C:N:P of the
42 fungal strains was 153:31:1. The three isolates grown in nutrient-modified media exhibited
weak homeostasis with respect to C:N, weak plasticity with respect to N:P, and strong plasticity
with respect to C:P. These results suggest that the local terrestrial fungi around Irvine are
controlled by environmental conditions, and their growth is both nitrogen- and phosphorus-
limited.

Introduction
The Redfield ratio has become canonical in the study of marine biogeochemistry. Alfred
Redfield found that marine primary producers were composed most notably of three elements:
carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P); and that these elements formed common atomic
ratios. In plankton, Redfield observed the average ratio of these three elements to be 106 carbon
atoms and 16 nitrogen atoms for every 1 atom of phosphorus. This ratio was reflected in the
plankton's environment as well; the ocean water where the plankton lived also averaged carbon,
nitrogen, and phosphorus in a ratio of 106:16:1 (Redfield 1958).
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 3


Organisms commonly handle their internal nutrients in one of two ways. The ability of an
organism to maintain consistent internal nutrient ratios independent of its environment is known
as homeostasis. It is generally regarded that most heterotrophic organisms are homeostatic, while
most autotrophs are non-homeostatic, or plastic; that is, they can alter their internal ratios to
match their environment. The importance of the ability to maintain homeostasis or to be plastic is
the effect that such organisms have in the ecosystem, primarily how they affect nutrient cycling.
The metabolism requirements of each type of organism affect environmental nutrient content
both by what the organism eats while it is alive, and what it releases when it dies. Trophic level
also comes in to play as heterotrophs and autotrophs consume nutrients in different ways.
While the convention of homeostatic or non-homeostatic can be useful in determining the
role of an organism in its ecosystem, it does not necessarily hold true for all members of a certain
trophic type. Persson et al.
18
found that many of the autotrophs included in their analyses
exhibited strong homeostasis in regards to N:C and N:P, going against the convention of
autotrophs being plastic. Another study also found that in (primarily freshwater) phytoplankton,
N:P ratios remained consistent with that of the Redfield ratio (N:P of 16) despite wide ranges of
N:P supply ratios, revealing the phytoplankton to be more homeostatic
10
.
In the oceans, nutrient supply ratios may vary from Redfield, going as high as 100:1 for
N:P in some areas, or holding an average of 37:1 while the local plankton retain Redfield's 16:1
6
. These observations suggest that marine autotrophs may be more homeostatic than we think,
and that they have limits to how far their internal nutrient ratios can go but that their range is
wider than it is for heterotrophs.
While the Redfield ratio has helped us expand our understanding of marine
biogeochemical cycles and the significance that nutrient levels play in the ecosystem, the
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 4


terrestrial analog is not as well understood. Given the non-homogeneous nature of soil, it could
be assumed that nutrient ratios of soil and soil microbes may vary significantly from one location
to the next depending on soil type, vegetation, climate, etc. Nutrient ratios of soils and microbial
biomass compiled by Cleveland and Liptzin
4
resulted in a global terrestrial "Redfield ratio" of
186:13:1 for soil, and 60:7:1 for soil microbes. And nutrient ratios of aboveground foliage and
litter were found to be 1212:28:1 and 3007:45:1, respectively
14
.
The extent to which soil microbes affect soil nutrients is not as well understood as the
roles of marine microbes, but undoubtedly these organisms do play significant roles in soil
nutrient cycling. However, one key difference between the terrestrial and marine realms is that
most terrestrial microbes are heterotrophs, while most marine microbes are autotrophs. So does
the environment dictate what kinds of organisms can live there, or do organisms shape their
environments by altering nutrient supplies to suit their needs? Our goals were to derive a
"Redfield ratio" for local terrestrial fungi, compare that to pre-established nutrient ratios,
specifically the actual Redfield ratio, and determine the level of homeostasis of the fungi. How
similar or dissimilar are the nutrient ratios of specific terrestrial microbes compared to marine
microbes? Being heterotrophs, fungi should be homeostatic, but how well does the convention
actually hold? And to what extent is the environment controlling the nutrient content of fungi?

Materials and Methods
We obtained 43 strains of terrestrial fungi (Table 1) that were collected from soils near
Irvine, California. The fungi were grown in liquid malt-yeast extract (MYE) medium (2.5 g malt
extract, 2.5g yeast extract, 500 mL water) on a shaker at room temperature for ten days. After ten
days, the cultures were stored in a refrigerator at 0 C to limit any further growth.
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 5


Ten percent dilutions of the fungal cultures were created using 1 mL taken from the
original cultures added to 9 mL of fresh MYE medium. We prepared 6 diluted replicates for each
fungal strain - 3 replicates to be used for carbon and nitrogen (C/N) analysis, and 3 replicates for
organic phosphorus (POP) analysis resulting in a total of 252 replicates.
5 mL from each diluted replicate was then filtered using low vacuum filtration. The
filters used were 25 mm GF/F glass microfiber circle filters that had been precombusted in a
muffle furnace at 500 C for 5 hours. Each filter was rinsed with 0.2 M HCl and Milli-Q water
before filtering. The filters to be used for C/N analysis were also weighed before and after
filtering to find the filtered biomass. After filtration, the filters were placed in labeled 4-well
petri dishes and then stored in a freezer at -20 C. Before analyzing, the filters were dried in an
oven overnight at 60 C. Filters to be analyzed for C/N were weighed after drying to obtain total
filtered mass. They were then analyzed using a CHN analyzer.
The filters to be analyzed for organic phosphorus (POP) were transferred from the 4-well
petri dishes and placed in glass scintillation vials that had been washed with phosphorus-free
soap and soaked in an HCl bath, and precombusted in a muffle furnace at 450 C for 5 hours. Six
standards were also prepared for each set of fungal replicates using KH
2
PO
4
in concentrations of
0, 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100 microliters. 2 mL of 0.017 M MgSO
4
was added to each vial and then
capped with foil and placed in an oven to dry at 80-90 C. After drying, the vials were recapped
with precombusted foil and placed in a muffle furnace for 2.5 hours at 450 C. After cooling, 5
mL of 0.2 M HCl was added to each vial and the vials placed in an oven at 80-90 C for 30
minutes. After cooling again, the HCl was decanted into 50 mL tubes. The vials were rinsed with
5 mL of dH
2
0, which was also decanted into the 50 mL tubes. An extra 20 mL of dH
2
0 was
added to the 50 mL tubes for the first set of replicates (set A), and 30 mL of dH
2
0 was added to
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 6


the second two sets of replicates (set B, set C). 1 mL of molybdenum blue reagent was added to
each tube and mixed. The molybdenum blue reagent consisted of 0.025 M ammonium molybdate
tetrahydrate, 5 N sulfuric acid, 0.0023 M potassium antimonyl tartrate solution, and 0.307 M
ascorbic acid, mixed in the ratio of 2:5:1:2.
After adding and mixing the molybdenum blue reagent to the samples, 11 mL of solution
was transferred to a glass centrifuge tube and centrifuged for 1 minute. Each centrifuge tube was
then placed in a rack covered, covered with foil and let to sit for 20 minutes after which time the
contents were analyzed using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The spectrophotometer was zeroed
using a 50/50 solution of 0.2 M HCl and dH
2
0, and the samples were read using a wavelength of
885 nm.
For the homeostasis experiment, modified MYE treatments were prepared including
carbon-limited, nitrogen-limited, and phosphorus-limited treatments. All treatments were based
on a mixture of 0.15 g malt extract and 0.15 g yeast extract in 300 mL of dH
2
0, which was also
used as the control treatment. The carbon-limited treatment included the addition of 0.544 g
KH
2
PO
4
and 8.544 g NaNO
3
. The nitrogen-limited treatment included the addition of 0.068 g
KH
2
PO
4
and 1.802 g dextrose. The phosphorus-limited treatment included the addition of 0.383
g NaNO
3
and 0.643 g dextrose. All treatments were autoclaved before use.
From the full set of 43 fungal cultures, three strains representing two of the main fungal
phyla were selected to test homeostasis. The three strains chosen were the ascomycetes
Davidiella and Helotiales, and the zygomycete Mucor flavus. Three replicates of each treatment
were prepared for each strain resulting in 36 total replicates. Using sterile technique, glass test
tubes were filled with 24 mL of growth medium and inoculated with 0.5 mL of liquid fungal
culture. After inoculation, each tube was vortexed and set in a rack to incubate at room
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 7


temperature for up to 12 days. 1 mL samples were taken from each replicate 5 days after
inoculation and 12 days after inoculation. The samples were analyzed for C/N and POP
following the same protocol as for the nutrient ratio samples.

TABLE 1. Terrestrial fungal cultures obtained from soils near Irvine, California
Alternaria Sordariomycete Tetracladium Pleosporales
Hypocrea koningii Sordariomycetes Mucor flavus Cryptococcus
Hypocreales Camarosporium brabeji Mucor racemosus Rhodotorula minuta
Rhodotorula Rhodotorula Lewia Rhodotorula minuta
Davidiella Sordariomycetes Neofusicoccium Rhodotorula
Pleosporales Penicillium Dothideomycetes Exophiala
Exophiala Myrothecium roridum Helotiales Pleurophoma
Cercophorum Cryptococcus Dothidea Phaeosphaeria
Alternaria Aureobasidium Cryptococcus Helotiales
Myrothecium roridum Rhodotorula Phaeomoniella Epicoccum nigrum
Cryptococcus Cryptococcus Cryptococcus


Results
C:N:P ratios
Six replicates for each of the 43 fungal cultures were analyzed; three replicates for carbon
and nitrogen (C/N) analysis, and three replicates for organic phosphorus (POP) analysis.
Table 2 shows the mean and median molar amounts of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus
for the total set of fungal cultures. Mean and median nutrient ratios were also calculated (C:P,
N:P, C:N, C:N:P), along with standard deviations for molar carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus.
The average C:N:P ratio for the entire set of fungal cultures was found to be 152:33:1. Figures
A1 A3 show average C:P, N:P, and C:N values for each fungal strain compared to the
corresponding ratio of the Redfield ratio.

Homeostasis
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 8


During the homeostasis experiment, the treatments were sampled twice; 5 days after
inoculation and 12 days after inoculation. These time periods were chosen because they fit into
the experiment schedule while still allowing time to analyze the samples. Table B1 contains the
mean values of molar carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus of the three cultures during the first
sampling point, and Table B2 shows values from the second sampling point. Nutrient ratios for
both the fungi and the growth medium of the various treatments were calculated.
Graphs of homeostasis were created by log-transforming the nutrient ratios of the fungi
and the nutrient ratios of the growth medium and plotting them against each other (Fig C1 C3).
Nutrient ratios of the fungal cultures were taken as the average of the three replicates for each
treatment type at each sampling point. This resulted in two data sets per graph, one for each
sampling point. Linear trend lines were applied to the data sets and the slopes of the trend lines
were calculated. An average of the two slopes was used to find the level of homeostasis for that
specific culture and ratio type (e.g., C:P, N:P, C:N).
The slope of the linear trend lines was used to find the level of homeostasis, as the slope
is equivalent to the value 1/H, where H equals the homeostatic coefficient of the organism. The
calculated value was left as 1/H and categorized using a scale from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates the
organism is strictly homeostatic, while 1 indicates a strict level of non-homeostasis
18
. This
range was further broken down to four categories to give more specific levels of homeostasis as
follows: 0 < 1/H < 0.25 = strictly homeostatic; 0.25 < 1/H < 0.5 = weakly homeostatic; 0.5 < 1/H
< 0.75 = weakly plastic; 0.75 < 1/H < 1 = strictly plastic.
With regards to C:P (Fig. C1), the following 1/H values were obtained: 1.100
(Davidiella), 0.898 (M. flavus), and 1.298 (Helotiales). For N:P (Fig. C2), the values were: 0.631
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 9


(Davidiella), 0.515 (M. flavus), and 0.655 (Helotiales). For C:N (Fig. C3), 1/H values were:
0.476 (Davidiella), 0.373 (M. flavus), and 0.450 (Helotiales).

TABLE 2. Statistical values of nutrients in experimental fungi that were obtained from soils near Irvine,
California.

Carbon
(micromoles)
Nitrogen
(micromoles)
Phosphorus
(micromoles)
C:P N:P C:N C:N:P
Mean 69.85 14.95 0.46 152 33 5 152:33:1
Median 69.81 15.89 0.49 142 32 4 142:32:1
S.D. 29.52 7.49 0.46 43 11 1
Minimum 22.47 2.98 0.19


Maximum 144.98 35.79 0.81


Discussion
Total fungal C:N:P ratios
Differences can be seen when comparing the average nutrient ratio of the observed fungal
cultures to that of more established ratios. The overall C:N:P ratio for this experiment was
152:33:1, compared to 106:16:1 for marine phytoplankton (Redfield ratio), and 60:7:1 for global
soil microbial biomass. Comparing C:P and N:P among the three major ratios, it could be
inferred that the observed fungi have less phosphorus than marine phytoplankton and other soil
microbes due to the higher ratios of both carbon and nitrogen compared to phosphorus. Overall
N:P for the fungi is double that of the Redfield ratio (33:1 for fungi, 16:1 for Redfield) and
remains higher on average for most of the observed cultures (Fig. A1). Overall N:P is also almost
five times higher than soil microbial biomass, which had an N:P of 7:1. The C:N ratios however,
show the opposite, with the observed fungi having the lowest C:N of the three major ratios (5:1
for fungi, 7:1 for Redfield, 9:1 for soil microbes) (Fig. A3). The lower C:N for the observed
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 10


fungi may indicate that they have a higher nitrogen demand than other soil microbes and marine
phytoplankton, while the higher N:P may indicate a phosphorus limitation in their environment.
It is interesting to note that the observed fungi have much higher nutrient ratios than the
global soil microbial biomass (with the exception of C:N). Fungi were assumed to be a part of
the data set assembled by Cleveland and Liptzin
4
, though fungi were not separated from bacteria
as the data were collected through literature review, focusing on chloroform fumigation and
extraction (FE) technique. The FE technique analyzes soil samples for C, N, and P and does not
discriminate for individual organisms (and may also extract non-microbial biomass as well).
There are several possible explanations for the seemingly large difference in these
nutrient ratios. Fungal biomass in the data collected for the soil microbial biomass study may not
have been large enough compared to microbial biomass to raise the average ratio closer to that
obtained in this experiment. Bacteria are also predominantly unicellular while fungi are
multicellular. The differences in cellular structure and function could also attribute to differences
in organismal nutrient ratios, as well as how the organisms obtain and metabolize nutrients.
Another significant difference is that fungal nutrient ratios obtained in this experiment are
representative only of the area from which they were collected, as well as the time of year. In
contrast, the soil microbial biomass study performed by Cleveland and Liptzin
4
used data from a
multitude of locations, climates, soil, and vegetation types. This larger sampling would probably
be closer to the Redfield ratio in that it is a global average representing a variety of locations and
organisms, overshadowing the fewer locations that might have significantly different nutrient
ratios.

Fungal homeostasis
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 11


The results of this homeostasis experiment indicate that the three observed fungal
cultures (Davidiella, M. flavus, Helotiales) appear to be more plastic (non-homeostatic) than
homeostatic (Fig. C1 C3). The average 1/H values of the cultures were in the range of being
strictly plastic for C:P (1.100, 0.898, 1.298 for Davidiella, M. flavus, and Helotiales,
respectively); weakly plastic for N:P (0.631, 0.515, and 0.655); and weakly homeostatic for C:N
(0.476, 0.373, and 0.450). If these values carry over to the other fungal cultures, then these fungi
appear to be more plastic than homeostatic, contradicting the previous assumption that all
heterotrophs are homeostatic. However, there has not been significant study into the homeostasis
of heterotrophs, so whether or not the majority of heterotrophs are indeed homeostatic has yet to
be determined.
There is the concept of homeostatic gradient, where some organisms have been found to
be strictly one way or the other, but other organisms have been found to be more in the middle,
not being entirely homeostatic or non-homeostatic
8
. There is also the possibility that
homeostasis levels may be reflective of certain growth conditions. Some species of
phytoplankton reveal differing internal nutrient ratios from their environment, giving way to
generalized growth strategies, such as the survivalist which can sustain growth even during
periods of low environmental resources
2
. This concept could carry over to fungi; perhaps fungi
grow differently during early growth periods than compared to more established fungi with
significant biomass. Larger fungal masses may level off their internal nutrient ratios and become
more homeostatic. There is also the issue of how an organism grown in a liquid medium
compares to how it would grow in soil, as the liquid is more dynamic and gives greater access to
nutrients than soil.
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 12


Interestingly, the fungal C:N:P ratios of the P-limited treatments 5 days after inoculation
closely resemble the Redfield ratio, (Table B1). The C:NP ratios of Davidiella, M. flavus, and
Helotiales were 129:19:1, 116:14:1, and 117:26:1, respectively. However, these ratios showed
some change during the second sampling point - 128:22:1, 80:12:1, 182:36:1 (Table B2). This
may support the previous suggestion that fungi exhibit differing characteristics throughout
growth. Figures C1 C3 show the trends of the two sampling points for each of the three fungal
cultures. Most of the data sets remain relatively equal or proportional, supporting a steady level
of homeostasis through the two sampling points. However, deviations may be seen in a few of
the graphs, particularly in C:P for Helotiales, and in C:N for Davidiella and M. flavus. These
deviations may be insignificant, indicating a standard variation in the internal nutrients of a
growing organism. Or they may be indicative of a larger trend leading towards a change in
homeostasis at different growth periods.

Future directions
Nutrient cycling in terrestrial soil microbes, specifically fungi, is not as well understood
as it is in marine phytoplankton. Further research should be performed to better understand
possible correlations between marine and terrestrial chemical cycling, as well as the role and
significance of microorganisms in biogeochemical cycles. Knowledge in terrestrial
biogeochemical cycling maintains importance in many areas such as environmental and
ecological health, and applications in agriculture and bioremediation. The homeostasis of
terrestrial microorganisms also plays an important role in furthering our understanding
biogeochemical cycles. Knowledge of how these microorganisms grow and metabolize can aid
in mapping evolutionary lineages between terrestrial and marine microbes, even giving light to
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 13


the chemical composition of prehistoric environments. On a larger scale, this information can
lead to an increased ability and accuracy of modeling past climates. Microorganisms already play
a large role in shaping our environment and our lives. More clearly understanding how exactly
they behave will allow us to further our applications and appreciation for these crucial
organisms.

Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 14


References
1. Agbenin JO, Adeniyi T. 2005. The microbial biomass properties of a savanna soil under
improved grass and legume pastures in northern Nigeria. Agriculture, Ecosystems and
Environment. 109:245-254.
2. Arrigo KR. 2005. Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature. 438:349-355.
3. Chen MM, Yin HB, O'Connor P, Wang YS, Zhu YG. 2010. C:N:P stoichiometry and
specific growth rate of clover colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil. 326:21-
29.
4. Cleveland CC, Liptzin D. 2007. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a "Redfield ratio" for
the microbial biomass?. Biogeochemistry. 85:235-252.
5. DeMott WR. 2003. Implications of element deficits for zooplankton growth. Hydrobiologia.
491:177-184.
6. Downing JA. 1997. Marine nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometry and the global N:P cycle.
Biogeochemistry. 37:237-252.
7. Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT,
Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE. 2007. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus
limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology
letters. 10:1-8.
8. Elser JJ. Fundamentals of ecological stoichiometry. Powerpoint presentation.
9. Flynn KJ, Raven JA, Rees TAV, Finkel Z, Quigg A, Beardall J. 2010. Is the growth rate
hypothesis applicable to microalgae?. J Phycol. 46:1-12.
10. Hall SR, Smith VH, Lytle DA, Leibold MA. 2005. Constraints on primary producer N:P
stoichiometry along N:P supply ratio gradients. Ecology. 86(7):1894-1904.
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 15


11. Klausmeier CA, Litchman E, Tanguy D, Levin SA. 2004. Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus
stoichiometry of phytoplankton. Nature. 429:171-174.
12. Krashevska V, Maraun M, Ruess L, Scheu S. 2010. Carbon and nutrient limitation of soil
microorganisms and microbial grazers in a tropical montane rain forest. Oikos. 119:1020-
1028.
13. Leach D. 2011. Microbial stoichiometry and homeostasis of nutrient ratios in fungi. Bridges.
5:34-50.
14. McGroddy ME, Daufresne T, Hedin LO. 2004. Scaling of C:N:P stoichiometry in forests
worldwide: implications of terrestrial redfield-type ratios. Ecology. 85(9):2390-2401.
15. Murphy J, Riley JP. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of
phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta. 27:31-36.
16. Paustian K, Schnurer J. 1987. Fungal growth response to carbon and nitrogen limitation:
application of a model to laboratory and field data. Soil Biol Biochem. 19(5):621-629.
17. Paustian K, Schnurer J. 1987. Fungal growth response to carbon and nitrogen limitation: a
theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem. 19(5):613-620.
18. Persson J, Fink P, Goto A, Hood JM, Jonas J, Kato S. 2010. To be or not to be what you eat:
regulation of stoichiometric homeostasis among autotrophs and heterotrophs. Oikos.
119:741-751.
19. Sjosten A, Blomqvist S. 1997. Influence of phosphate concentration and reaction temperature
when using the molybdenum blue method for determination of phosphate in water. Wat Res.
31: 1818-1823.
20. Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
440 p.
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 16


21. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW. 1991. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it
occur?. Biogeochemistry. 13:87-115.


Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 17


Appendix A Fungi Nutrient Ratios


Figure A1. Average carbon to phosphorus (C:P) value of each fungal culture. Average values
were obtained during the nutrient ratio experiment. These values were used to calculate the
average C:P for the entire set of fungal cultures that were obtained from soils near Irvine,
California. Values are unitless ratios and are the average of three replicates for each culture.
Standard deviations are shown as I-bars. The black horizontal line represents the C:P value of the
Redfield ratio.

0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
Fungi C:P
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 18





Figure A2. Average carbon to phosphorus (N:P) value of each fungal culture. Average values
were obtained during the nutrient ratio experiment. These values were used to calculate the
average N:P for the entire set of fungal cultures that were obtained from soils near Irvine,
California. Values are unitless ratios and are the average of three replicates for each culture.
Standard deviations are shown as I-bars. The black horizontal line represents the N:P value of the
Redfield ratio.

0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Fungi N:P
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 19





Figure A3. Average carbon to phosphorus (C:N) value of each fungal culture. Average values
were obtained during the nutrient ratio experiment. These values were used to calculate the
average C:N for the entire set of fungal cultures that were obtained from soils near Irvine,
California. Values are unitless ratios and are the average of three replicates for each culture.
Standard deviations are shown as I-bars. The black horizontal line represents the C:N value of
the Redfield ratio.

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Fungi C:N
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 20


Appendix B Nutrient values of homeostasis experiment

TABLE B1. Nutrient values of homeostasis experiment 5 days after inoculating modified
growth medium treatments with fungal cultures obtained from soils near Irvine, California.
Strain Treatment
Carbon
(mol)
Nitrogen
(mol)
Phosphorus
(mol)
C:P N:P C:N C:N:P
Davidiella Control 7.98 2.03 0.16 51.34 13.03 3.94 51:13:1
C-Limited 4.38 19.64 1.24 3.54 15.86 0.22 4:16:1
N-Limited 15.54 1.42 0.37 42.46 3.87 10.96 42:4:1
P-Limited 8.64 1.24 0.07 129.33 18.60 6.95 129:19:1

M. flavus Control 7.21 1.43 0.13 53.46 10.61 5.04 53:11:1
C-Limited 4.06 21.39 1.20 3.38 17.81 0.19 3:18:1
N-Limited 15.69 1.32 0.38 41.57 3.51 11.85 42:4:1
P-Limited 8.30 1.00 0.07 116.04 13.94 8.33 116:14:1

Helotiales Control 6.26 1.43 0.14 44.22 10.10 4.38 44:10:01
C-Limited 3.95 20.39 1.12 3.51 18.16 0.19 4:18:01
N-Limited 16.48 1.69 0.39 41.77 4.29 9.74 42:04:01
P-Limited 8.51 1.87 0.07 116.57 25.65 4.54 117:26:01

Growth Control 119.56 25.13 4.76 120:25:1
Medium C-Limited

3.10 25.13 0.12 3:25:1
N-Limited

119.56 4.40 27.17 120:4:1
P-Limited 320.53 67.37 4.76 321:67:1


Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 21



TABLE B2. Nutrient values of homeostasis experiment 12 days after inoculating modified
growth medium treatments with fungal cultures obtained from soils near Irvine, California.
Strain Treatment
Carbon
(mol)
Nitrogen
(mol)
Phosphorus
(mol)
C:P N:P C:N C:N:P
Davidiella Control 8.54 2.38 0.21 40.95 11.41 3.59 41:11:1
C-Limited 3.48 21.90 1.09 3.19 20.07 0.16 3:20:1
N-Limited 16.42 1.49 0.41 40.12 3.65 11.00 40:4:1
P-Limited 7.00 1.23 0.05 127.61 22.37 5.70 128:22:1

M. flavus Control 8.45 1.90 0.20 41.34 9.29 4.45 41:9:1
C-Limited 3.01 18.59 1.13 2.67 16.49 0.16 3:16:1
N-Limited 17.34 1.59 0.44 39.24 3.59 10.92 39:4:1
P-Limited 7.73 1.11 0.10 80.20 11.57 6.93 80:12:1

Helotiales Control 8.19 2.15 0.27 30.06 7.90 3.80 30:8:1
C-Limited 2.25 13.36 1.19 1.90 11.26 0.17 2:11:1
N-Limited 17.79 1.79 0.38 47.05 4.73 9.94 47:5:1
P-Limited 8.27 1.62 0.05 182.27 35.67 5.11 182:36:1

Growth Control 119.56 25.13 4.76 120:25:1
Medium C-Limited

3.10 25.13 0.12 3:25:1
N-Limited

119.56 4.40 27.17 120:4:1
P-Limited 320.53 67.37 4.76 321:67:1


Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 22


Appendix C - Fungi nutrient ratios versus growth medium
FIGURE C1. Homeostasis relative to C:P of fungi
obtained from soils near Irvine, California.






FIGURE C1. Fungal C:P ratios versus growth medium C:P ratios for the fungal cultures
Davidiella, M. flavus, and Helotiales. Equations and R
2
values of trend lines are shown, as is the
1:1 line (diagonal solid line) representing a perfect 1 to 1 ratio.
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 23


FIGURE C2. Homeostasis relative to N:P of
fungi obtained from soils near Irvine,
California.






FIGURE C2. Fungal N:P ratios versus growth medium N:P ratios for the fungal cultures
Davidiella, M. flavus, and Helotiales. Equations and R
2
values of trend lines are shown, as is the
1:1 line (diagonal solid line) representing a perfect 1 to 1 ratio.
Stoichiometry and homeostasis of terrestrial fungi 24


FIGURE C3. Homeostasis relative to C:N of
fungi obtained from soils near Irvine,
California.






FIGURE C3. Fungal C:N ratios versus growth medium C:N ratios for the fungal cultures
Davidiella, M. flavus, and Helotiales. Equations and R
2
values of trend lines are shown, as is the
1:1 line (diagonal solid line) representing a perfect 1 to 1 ratio.