Real Personal Income for States and Metropolitan Areas,

2008-2012
Real Personal Income for States and Metropolitan Areas, 2008-2012
Today, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released real, price-adjusted estimates of personal
income for states and metropolitan areas for 2008-2012.
"For the first time, Americans looking to move or take a job anywhere in the country can compare
inflation-adjusted incomes across states and metropolitan areas to better understand how their
personal income may be affected by a job change or move. Businesses considering relocating or
establishing new plants also now have a comprehensive and consistent measure of differences in the
cost of living and the purchasing power of consumers nationwide. The Commerce
Departments 'Open for Business Agenda' prioritizes making our data more accessible and
understandable so that it can continue powering both small and large businesses nationwide," said
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker.
The price-adjustments are based on regional price parities (RPPs) and on BEAs national
Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) price index. The RPPs measure geographic differences in
the price levels of consumption goods and services relative to the national average, and the PCE
price index measures national price changes over time (see Technical Note). Using the RPPs in
combination with the PCE price index allows for comparisons of the purchasing power of personal
income across regions and over time. These estimates are being released for the first time as official
statistics1.
Real Personal Income for States and Metropolitan Areas
Real personal income across all regions rose by an average of 2.3% in 2012. This growth rate
reflects the year-over-year change in nominal personal income across all regions adjusted by the
change in the national PCE price index. On a nominal basis, personal income across all regions grew
an average of 4.2% in 2012. In 2012, the U.S. PCE price index grew 1.8%.
Growth in real state personal income from 2011 to 2012 ranged from a decline of 1.2% in South
Dakota to an increase of 15.1% in North Dakota. These growth rates reflect the year-over-year
change in the states nominal personal income, the change in the national PCE price index,
and the change in the regional price parity for that state. After North Dakota, the states with the
largest growth rates were Montana (3.7%), Indiana (3.7%), California (3.4%), and Mississippi (3.4%).
South Dakota was the only state with a decline in real personal income. The states with the smallest
growth rates were Maine (0.3%), Alaska (0.7%), and Alabama (0.8%). The District of
Columbias growth rate was 0.4%. States with growth rates close to the national average
were Delaware (2.4%), Georgia (2.2%), Illinois (2.4%), Minnesota (2.2%), and Oregon (2.4%).
Growth in real metropolitan area personal income from 2011 to 2012 ranged from a decline of 3.8%
in Kennewick-Richland, WA to an increase of 10.2% in Odessa, TX. After Odessa, TX, the
metropolitan areas with the largest growth rates were Midland, TX (9.6%), Greenville, NC (9.0%),
Jackson, TN (8.1%), and Columbus, IN (7.6%). After Kennewick-Richland, WA, the metropolitan
areas with the largest declines were Watertown-Fort Drum, NY (-2.5%), State College, PA (-2.4%),
Hanford-Corcoran, CA (-2.3%), and Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ (-1.7%).
Regional Price Parities
Regional Price Parities (RPPs) measure the differences in the price levels of goods and services
across states and metropolitan areas for a given year. RPPs are expressed as a percentage of the
overall national price level for each year, which is equal to 100.0.
In 2012, the District of Columbias RPP (118.2) was higher than that of any state. The states
with the highest RPPs were Hawaii (117.2), New York (115.4), New Jersey (114.1), and California
(112.9). Mississippi (86.4), Arkansas (87.6), Alabama (88.1), Missouri (88.1), and South Dakota
(88.2) had the lowest RPPs among the States. States with high (low) RPPs typically have relatively
high (low) price levels for rents. States with RPPs closest to the national average price level were
Florida (98.8), Oregon (98.8), Illinois (100.6), and Vermont (100.9).
In 2012, the metropolitan area with the highest RPP was Urban Honolulu, HI (122.9). Metropolitan
areas with RPPs above 120.0 also include New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA (122.2), San Jose-
Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA (122.0), Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT (121.5), Santa Cruz-
Watsonville, CA (121.4), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA (121.3), and Washington-Arlingto-
-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (120.4). The metropolitan area with lowest RPP was Danville, IL (79.4),
followed by Jefferson City, MO (80.8), Jackson, TN (81.5), Jonesboro, AR (81.7), and Rome, GA
(82.2).
Technical Note on Regional Price Parities
and Implicit Regional Price Deflators
Price indexes commonly measure price
changes over time. The BEAs
Personal Consumption Expenditure price
index and the BLS Consumer Price
Index (CPI) are two examples. Spatial price
indexes measure price level differences
across regions for one time period. An
example of these type of indexes are
purchasing power parities (PPPs), which
measure differences in price levels across countries for a given period, and can be used to convert
estimates of per capita GDP into comparable levels in a common currency. The regional price
parities (RPPs) that BEA has developed compare regions within the United States, but without the
need for currency conversion. An implicit regional price deflator (IRPD) can be derived by combining
the RPPs and the PCE price index.
Regional Price Parities. The RPPs are calculated using price quotes for a wide array of items from
the CPI, which are aggregated into broader expenditure categories (such as food, transportation, or
education). Data on rents are obtained separately from the Census Bureaus American
Community Survey (ACS). The expenditure weights for each category are constructed using the
BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey and BEAs Personal Consumption Expenditures2.
The broader categories and the data on rents are combined with the expenditure weights using a
multilateral aggregation method that expresses a regions price level relative to the US3.
For example, if the RPP for area A is 120
and for area B is 90, then on average,
prices are 20% higher and 10% lower than
the US average for A and B respectively. If
the Personal Income for area A is $12,000
and for area B is $9,000, then RPP-adjusted
incomes are $10,000 ($12,000/1.20) and
$10,000 ($9,000/0.90) respectively. In other
words, the purchasing power of the two
incomes is equivalent when adjusted by
their respective RPPs.
Implicit Regional Price Deflator. The IRPD
is a regional price index derived as the product of two terms: the regional price parity and the US
PCE price index.
Implicit regional price deflator for region i: P_i = P_i,us * P_us
The first term on the right-hand side of the equation is P_i,us, which is the regional price parity for
region i (using the US as the reference region4). The second term is P_us, the national PCE price
index.
The implicit regional price deflator will equal current dollar personal income divided by real
personal income in chained dollars. The growth rate or year-to-year change in the IRPDs is a
measure of regional inflation5.
Detailed information on the methodology used to estimate the RPPs may be found in the article,
"Real personal income and Regional Price Parities for States and Metropolitan Areas, 2007-2011", in
the August 2013 issue of the Survey of Current Business.
Definitions
Personal income is the income received by all persons from all sources. Personal income is the sum
of net earnings by place of residence, property income, and personal current transfer receipts. These
are current dollar estimates. Comparisons for different regions and time periods reflect changes in
both the price and quantity components of regional personal income.
Estimates of personal income in the United States are derived as the sum of the regional estimates.
These differ from the estimates of personal income in the national income and product account
(NIPAs) because of differences in coverage, in the methodologies used to prepare the estimates, and
in the timing of the availability of source data.
Regional price parities (RPPs) are regional price levels expressed as a percentage of the overall
national price level for a given year. The price level is determined by the average prices paid by
consumers for the mix of goods and services consumed in each region.
cheap business class to europe
Detailed CPI price data are adjusted to obtain average price levels for BLS-defined areas6. These are
allocated to counties in combination with direct price and expenditure data on rents from the ACS.
County data are then aggregated to states and metropolitan areas.
Personal income at RPPs is current-dollar
personal income divided by the price parity7
for a given year and region. A balancing
factor is applied so that the sum of personal
income at RPPs across regions equals the
current dollar sum.
Real personal income is personal income at
RPPs divided by the national PCE chain-type
price index. The result is real personal
income in chained dollars (using 2008 as the
reference year)8. Using Colorado in 2012 as
an example:
Estimates of real personal income in the United States are derived as the sum of the regional
estimates divided by the U.S. PCE Price Index.
Implicit Regional Price Deflator (IRPD) is the product of the RPP times the national PCE price
index9. It is equal to personal income divided by real personal income. See also the Technical Note.
* * *
The tables in this press release are also available on the BEA website. Additional tables showing
estimates of real income and regional price parities can also be found there for state metropolitan
and nonmetropolitan portions, and metropolitan areas.
BEAs national, international, regional, and industry statistics; the Survey of Current
Business; and BEA news releases are available without charge on BEAs web site at
www.bea.gov. By visiting the site, you can also subscribe to receive free e-mail summaries of BEA
releases and announcements.
Next real personal income release April 2015 for states, state metropolitan and
nonmetropolitan portions, and metropolitan areas.
1 Prototype statistics were released for evaluation and comment by users on June 12, 2013.
2 To estimate RPPs, CPI price quotes are quality adjusted and pooled over 5 years. The ACS rents
are also quality adjusted, and in the case of the metropolitan areas, pooled over 3 years. The
expenditure weights are specific to each year.
3 The multilateral system that is used is the Geary additive method. Any region or combination of
regions may be used as the base or reference region without loss of consistency.
4 A different reference region could be used as the base, as long as the time-to-time price index was
consistent with the new base.
5 The growth rate of the implicit regional price deflators will not necessarily equal the region or
metro area price deflators published by the BLS. This is because the CPI deflators are calculated
directly while the IRPDs are indirect estimates, and because of differences in the source data and
the methodology. For a complete description see the BEA working paper titled "Note on estimating
the Multi-year regional price parities by 16 expenditure categories: 2005-2009"
6 The CPI represents about 87% of the total U.S. population, including almost all residents of urban
or metropolitan areas. Rural area prices (exclusive of Rents) are assumed to be the same as those in
the urban, non-metropolitan areas of the CPI.
7 RPP should first be divided by 100.
8 Real personal income estimates are in 2008 dollars, the first year of the series in this release.
9 The IRPDs will equal the RPPs in the reference year, 2008.