0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
19 visualizzazioni3 pagine
This paper demonstrates that the detailed analysis of Lithic Artefacts contributes as much to the understanding of cultural development as do studies of ceramics, architecture or any other material evidence. It is now possible to demonstrate chronological changes in the forms of some lithic tools, in response to the developing needs of Aksum's monetised, urban economy.
This paper demonstrates that the detailed analysis of Lithic Artefacts contributes as much to the understanding of cultural development as do studies of ceramics, architecture or any other material evidence. It is now possible to demonstrate chronological changes in the forms of some lithic tools, in response to the developing needs of Aksum's monetised, urban economy.
This paper demonstrates that the detailed analysis of Lithic Artefacts contributes as much to the understanding of cultural development as do studies of ceramics, architecture or any other material evidence. It is now possible to demonstrate chronological changes in the forms of some lithic tools, in response to the developing needs of Aksum's monetised, urban economy.
Lithic Artefacts as a Source of Cultural, Social and Economic information:
The evidence from Aksum, Ethiopia
Laurel Phillipson 11 Brooklyn Threshfield Bd23 5ER England dw.l.phillipson@btinternet.com
September 2008
Every stone tool reflects the economy within which it was produced and the processes by which it was shaped. Without going into specific details, which will soon be published (L. Phillipson, in press), this paper demonstrates that the detailed analysis of lithic artefacts contributes as much to the understanding of cultural development as do studies of ancient ceramics, architecture or any other material evidence, and that the systematic recovery and interpretation of knapped stone artefacts should be given equal priority as a significant aspect of all field research from the Prehistoric to the Post-Aksumite in the area with which we are concerned. [Time periods referred to are as defined by Professor R. Fattovich: Pre-Aksumite circa 700 to 400 BC; Proto- Aksumite to 150 BC; Early Aksumite to AD 150; Classic Aksumite to circa AD 450; Middle Aksumite to AD 550; Late Aksumite to AD 700.]
More than a decade of research into the lithic industries of Aksum and its near hinterland has progressed from the straightforward recovery and recording of excavated and surface-collected artefacts to the demonstration that these were a significant and varied component of all periods of Aksumite material culture, and to an understanding of their economic and social significance within that culture. It is now possible to demonstrate chronological changes in the forms of some lithic tools 1 and in the composition of excavated assemblages and surface collections, in response to the developing needs of Aksums monetised, urban economy. It is also possible to identify the uses to which some of the lithic tools were applied and the social and economic patterns involved in their production and use.
Three distinct lithic traditions are identified as having been present during the Pre- Aksumite period. Of these, the dominant industry at Aksum is morphologically and technologically related to and derived from earlier autochthonous aceramic and ceramic mode 5 industries. This microlithic Pre-Aksumite industry developed in an unbroken sequence throughout the time from the Pre-Aksumite to its demise at the end of the Late Aksumite or early in the Post Aksumite period. No such continuity is demonstrable for a surprisingly archaic looking macrolithic Pre-Aksumite industry which comprises the only knapped lithics recovered from Hwalti, south of Aksum, and from a few minor occurrences closer to Aksum. Some influence from a third local Pre-Aksumite industry may perhaps be seen in the lithics of the Proto-Aksumite period. The presence in the same area of these very different Pre-Aksumite lithic industries, one of which appears to have been an entirely local development and another intrusive, has a significant bearing on our understanding of Pre-Aksumite settlement patterns and the rise of the Aksumite civilisation.
Development of Aksumite lithic technology is shown to have progressed from a generalist activity in the Pre-, Proto- and Early Aksumite periods, to a restricted, specialist skill by the beginning of the Late Aksumite, with various patterns of tool production and use at various types of sites, before disappearing by the start of the Post-Aksumite period. We thus have for Aksum and its environs the outlines of of a complete record of the technical and cultural development of a significant stone tool producing tradition.
___________________
REFERENCES
Fattovich, R., K. A. Bard, L. Petrassi & V. Pisano, 2000. The Aksum Archaeological Area: a preliminary assessment. Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale. 2 3
Fattovich, R., Tekle H., L. Phillipson & L. Sernicola 2006. Ethiopian Cultural Heritage Project, Aksum Branch, Site Planning and Conservation Component, Archaeological Survey: Report of Activity, March May 2006 and Aksum World Heritage Site Management Plan. The World Bank and Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa & Firenze: Hydea.
Phillipson, D. W. et al 2000. Archaeology at Aksum, Ethiopia, 1993-7. London: The British Institute in Eastern Africa & the Society of Antiquaries of London.
Phillipson, L. 2000a. Aksumite Lithic Industries. African Archaeological Review 17:49-63.
2000b. A Functional Consideration of Gudit Scrapers from Aksum, Ethiopia. in L. Krzyaniak et al (eds) Recent Research on the Stone Age of Northeastern Africa: 259-76. Poznan: Muzeum Archeolgiczne w Poznaniu.
2000c. The Prehistoric Antecedents of Aksum; Lithics from the D Site at Kidane Mehret; Lithics from the K site in Maleke Aksum; Lithic Industries; Surface Collections of Aksumite Lithics; and passim in D. W. Phillipson et al 2000.
2004. Lithic Tools: a hitherto unrecognised component of Aksumite material culture. in E. A. Walker, F. Wenban-Sm ith & F. Healey (eds) Lithics in Action: 254- 69. Oxford: Lithic Studies Society & Oxbow.
Phillipson, L. & F. Sulas 2005. Cultural Continuity in Aksumite Lithic Tool Production, the evidence from Mai Agam. Azania 40:1-18.
Phillipson, L. in press. Using Stone Tools: the evidence from Aksum, Ethiopia. Oxford: BAR, Archaeopress.