The individual who had inspired the prior Blast e-mail was amenable to listening to my concerns, but

two of my comments appeared bothersome; I told her that her claim that Sarah Palin is dumb may be
based on media-indoctrination, particularly because she admitted Sarahs prediction that the Ruskies
might invade the Crimean Peninsula was realized. Also, I used the term evil to depict BHO because of
his having consistently funded Islamists who [in Syria] are committing atrocities against Christians [and,
of course, have nefarious designs on Jews] instead of supporting the Kurds; factor-in his obeisance
regarding Iran [which has reportedly supplied ~100K missiles to Hezbollah in Lebanon], and you have a
rather conclusive anti-Israel case [enhanced by ideologues he has appointed, such as Kerry/Hagel].
{Curiously, as is typical of agnostics/atheists, obamas-refused-to-hate-evil.}

I feel compelled to clarify, also, my approach to supporting candidates, a perspective
with which most party committee-people would probably concur; although I cannot
donate to Dems, I can harbor preferences and function accordingly [such as when I was
pleased that Brendan Boyle bested the three more-leftie Dems in PA-13, for he and his
staff are truly committed to passage of the mandatory Holocaust Education bill]. But,
then was then and now is now, and, therefore, I will eagerly support Dee Adcock.

Also, I could adopt an agnostic posture if I truly preferred the Dem over the Republican;
I liken this to my gripe against AIPAC for not having opposed the Gaza-withdrawal in 05
[and have informed leaders of that organization accordingly]. In both instances, if there
is reason to doubt what the party/country apparatus is doing, one can channel such
energies by speaking-out [as I did via a letter-to-the-editor of the Jewish Exponent] or by
allowing intertial forces to play-out [rather than publicly supporting a non-Republican].
In this fashion, an individual can remain true to thyself while being positive-assertive.

Thus, under normal circumstances, I could accommodate Dems [even Hillary, despite
her Alinsky-roots and her latest absurdity, claiming the COUNTRY HAS TO DEAL WITH
THE 'CANCER OF INEQUALITY'] but, because BHO is SO-VERY PROBLEMATIC, I am forced
to advocate straight-party voting; he must be deprived of all possible policy-enablers.
Until/unless a Dem-candidate emerges who would denounce BHOs approach to
implementation of allegedly-benign Dem-stances, voters must support just the GOP.
BHO is revealing faulty basic policies regarding Big Government, in my opinion, but he is
so very extreme in his ideology and incompetence that every effort must be made to
impede his ability to succeed [recalling how Rush was lambasted for adopting this view
immediately after BHO was inaugurated]; his anti-Semitism [vide infra] knows no limit.

Guzzardi continues to lambaste Corbett, even as I continue to ID his known-deficiencies;
nevertheless, his policies are based on conservatism, whereas those of Wolfe are not.
My trenchant concern has been focused upon his re-electability, but he is the nominee;
thus, as I wrote prior to the election [transmitted via e-mail openly, and Guzzardi], it is
time to unify. Perhaps circumstances would have differed had he tried to campaign
traditionally rather than to have relied upon social-media [and visits to farm/gun shows]
but, regardless of the rectitude of his political positions [with which I generally concur],
he risks self-marginalization if he picks-at-scabs without viewing the overall environs.
{Again, I share Guzzardis lamentation that, all across America, Wall Street is Looting the
Pension Funds, grabbing money meant for public workers; nevertheless, it is possible to
combat overarching union-influence by passing the Paycheck Protection Act.}

This posture is not inconsistent with supporting ongoing efforts of the growing TEA
[Taxed Enough Already] Party Movement. I was thrilled that the TEA PARTY TOOK TEXAS
in the Republican Primary Runoff Election; whereas DAN PATRICK said 'IT'S A NEW DAY
IN TEXAS,' his oft-defeated opponent, incumbent-DEWHURST, CALLED FOR PARTY
UNITY IN CONCESSION SPEECH. In Mississippi, CNN noted Thad Cochran is Hiding from
Reporters and the Clarion-Ledger noted Thad Cochran did a 'bait-and-switch' on
national reporters, while the GOP-Establishments new flier savagely Attacked Donnelly.
Finally, as was also noted just now on OReilly, CANTORS PRIMARY CHALLENGER, DAVID
BRAT, said Cantors ANTI-AMNESTY MAILER was an 'ACT OF A DESPERATE CAMPAIGN';
as noted by Limbaugh, Dems want to Use Amnesty to Import a Permanent Underclass of
Poor, People of Color, whereas the GOP-base simply seeks rule-of-law. This is why,
recognizing the GOPs civil-war, I tend to support the more conservative candidate but,
regardless, would want to talk-up whomever may emerge victorious post-primary.

As anticipated, BHOs articulation of a doctrine amounted to a stated-goal of avoiding extremes
[isolationism and militarism]; he eschewed a positively-phrased raison d'tre for what America seeks,
although he did pointedly correct his error [uttered years agm] of equating American Execptionalism
with the expectation that other countries harbor a comparable self-image. He denied being WEAK but,
after he ISSUED NEW TERROR WARNING, the West Point cadets gave him an 'Icy Reception'; meanwhile,
China Deployed Nuke Subs Amid Growing Maritime Tensions and a Divided Latin America Favors Fast-
Growing Pacific Region. Thus, Obamas Strategy Aims to Avoid Overreach Overseas, recognizing that the
U.S. remains the only nation capable of galvanizing action and, thus, that American power needs to be
part of a sustainable international system; he is an "interventionist and internationalist." Some foreign
policy analysts argue that he has over-corrected and his aversion to military action makes it harder for
the U.S. to levy credible threats that force international foes to change their behavior. "He's far too risk-
adverse; in a world where no one will lead except America, he has abdicated and surrendered much of
the leadership," said Aaron David Miller, Middle East adviser to GOP and Dem administrations. {Note
that, West Point Invited BHO, An Anti-American, To Speak At Graduation, recognizing that what the
Graduates Of West Point Should Have Heard was in a speech delivered 40 years ago by Ayn Rand.}

Obama Omitted claiming to have achieved Mideast Peace in U.S. Foreign Policy Speech,
reflecting how poorly negotiations went during the past nine months. Also unmentioned
was the report that Obama is close to authorizing Military Training of moderate Syrian
Rebels to fight the regime and al-Qaeda-linked groups, a move that would significantly
expand Washington's role in the conflict; a new military training program would
supplement a small train-and-equip program led by the CIA that BHO authorized in 13.
Sllegedly-moderate Syrian rebels receive U.S.-backed training [via Turkey] in Qatar
[per a PBS documentary]; their three-week sojourn covers how to conduct ambushes,
conduct raids and use weapons. The U.S. has stepped up the provision of lethal aid to
the rebels. In recent months, at least five rebel units have posted videos showing their
members firing U.S.-made TOW anti-tank missiles at Syrian positions. One fighter said,
"They trained us to ambush regime or enemy vehicles and cut off the road; they also
trained us on how to attack a vehicle, raid it, retrieve information or weapons and
munitions, and how to finish-off soldiers still alive after an ambush."

Also, note that India's New Foreign Minister is a Strong Fan of Israel.

It has been rumored that the U.S. will recognize the Palestinian unity government when
it is established, even if Hamas does not accept the Quartet's conditions (recognition of
Israel, cessation of terror and adherence to past Israeli-Palestinian agreements),
because the Palestinian government will be comprised of "technocrats," not political
figures; ignored in this official excuse is the fact that half of the ministers in this
Palestinian Terror Government will be appointed by Hamas, a group has never forsworn
terrorism and that the U.S. itself has defined as a terrorist organization. The PLO and
Fatah accepted, outwardly, certain rules and commitments, particularly regarding
terrorism and violence, which enabled the ban on talking with them to be lifted.

Illustrative of why America should not return-iraqs jewish-archive [which belongs to the Jews for
practical as well as legal and moral reasons] are object-lesson-from-syria detailed by Shoshana Bryen;
she wants to protect-the-iraqi-jewish-archive-or-it-will-face-a-terrible-fate, a view that is corroborated
specifically by Photos of how Assad flattened Syria's Oldest Synagogue [the 400-year-old Eliyahu Hanabi
Synagogue, in the Jobar neighborhood of Damascus]; before the conflict, the synagogue held thousands
of religious and cultural treasures (including hundreds-years-old Torah scrolls, historical texts, precious
dining ware, and ancient Judaica). All Jewish heritage items housed by the synagogue are feared lost.

Illustrative of the modern version of anti-Semitism are two items-of-interest. First, read
how TOUR issued a non-apology 'APOLOGY' FOR HIS LATEST ANTI-SEMITIC TWEET [but,
alas, not for its predecessors]. Then note that the keynote speaker at an event held by
The International Center for Religion and Diplomacy (ICRD) [an organization with
extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood] was a FUTURE CUMULUS-RADIO HOST
[retiring Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI)], slated TO HONOR THE 'GROUND ZERO IMAM.' Some
feel this latest blunder could threaten his talk radio career before he even starts.

Other observations about the passing scene include those of ANN COULTER [who fears mid-term voters
WON'T REALIZE THEIR HEALTH INSURANCE IS ABOUT TO BE MADE ILLEGAL] and MSNBC'S CHRIS HAYES
[who speculated the CA SHOOTING is linked TO 'OPEN-CARRY' AND 'MEN'S RIGHTS' MOVEMENTS]. Also,
the recent death of Maya Angelou cannot erase her pro-Communist background, even as the LIBERAL
MEDIA BEMOANS PRO-LIFE ACTIVISTS' SUCCESS IN RESTRICTING ABORTION. Finally, Gwyneth Paltrow
said that facing a barrage of negative and anonymous Internet comments is almost akin to dodging
bullets or bombs in war, a truly absurd.

This is the summary of whats happening in Congress, this week, c/o Heritage Action:

Export-Import Bank
Defenders of Ex-Im are running out of arguments. Their persistent claim that despite its
distortions, the Bank still reaps profits for the U.S. taxpayers was finally contradicted last
week by a new report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. An analysis of
the costs of federal credit programs, including Ex-Im, found a $16 billion difference
between the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (FCRA) methodology and the fair-value
approach. By the more comprehensive assessment, taking into account actual risk
exposure, the CBO report says Ex-Im will cost taxpayers $2 billion over the next decade.
As Heritage Action CEO Michael Needham said in his statement, Todays report makes
clear those who wish to argue in favor of reauthorizing the Bank must do so on the
grounds that market disruption, taxpayer risk and cronyism are laudable, not on the
grounds of budgetary savings.
Immigration
Though the ENLIST Act (H.R. 2377) was recently blocked from inclusion on the National
Defense Authorization Act, press reports indicate plenty of reason to suspect it may be
considered as a stand-alone bill. The ENLIST Act would permit DREAMersunlawful
immigrants brought to the U.S. as minorsa backdoor promise of citizenship in
exchange for military service. Many have claimed this policy would not be entirely
different from that which exists under current military regulations. It is true that under
current law, immigrants who have obtained LPR status the proper way, through official
application channels, can enlist and become eligible for expedited citizenship. Under the
ENLIST Act, however, illegal immigrants made eligible for enlistment would receive not
only immediate LPR status (i.e. amnesty), but could apply for expedited consideration of
citizenship instantly and become citizens within months. This policy is a way to reward
law breakers, using the honor of military service as a pedestal for amnesty. Sentinels
should be on the lookout for attempts to reintroduce the bill.

Obamacare
Though many employers believed that they could escape the full impact of the
employer mandate by shifting a portion of the employees to the Obamacare exchanges,
the President has recently declared that this, too, is not acceptable by his standards. The
I.R.S. has ruled that any wholesale attempt by employers to dump employees onto the
exchanges is not in keeping with the health care law. Employers who do not offer the
specified health coverage will be subject to specified penalties. As the New York Times
recently reported, Many employers some that now offer coverage and some that do
not had concluded that it would be cheaper to provide each employee with a lump
sum of money to buy insurance on an exchange, instead of providing coverage directly.
However, the government has decreed that employers will not even be permitted
flexibility when it comes to how they will bear the burden of Obamacare.