Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Three weeks ago my wife and I returned from India and Nepal where
we took part in a few weeks of mission work. In July, before I left for
India and Nepal, Dean Paulson asked me to speak in chapel on this
day. It was while I was in India and Nepal that I decided to address
what weighs heavily upon my heart. India and Nepal, like America,
are filled with ungodliness in the form of prejudice and partiality.
One should not visit Nepal without making an effort to see Mount
Everest. Since we had a free day before returning home, the five of
us decided to take an excursion flight to see the Himalayan Mountain
1
Range. We learned that Buddha Air is the air service of choice
because they guarantee that every passenger will have a window
seat.
Since P. J. Mathai was our guest, we decided to pay for his ticket.
The ticket agent for Buddha Air informed us that because P. J.
Mathai is an Indian his ticket would cost 26% less than ours. Buddha
Air functions like many others in Nepal. When they see Americans
and Europeans they see money.
The next day, when we waited at the airport early in the morning,
we learned that our flight was canceled because of weather. As we
were about to leave, a Buddha Air agent hurriedly came to us with
news that they had five vacant seats on a plane that was about to
depart. We decided to take them. As we left the bus on the tarmac
to walk to the plane, the agent gave us new boarding passes for the
plane, but he gave none to P. J. Not until we took our seats did we
realize why our friend, P. J. Mathai, had not received a boarding
pass. He was on the plane, but his seat, contrary to Buddha Air’s
guarantee, had no window. Imagine taking an airplane excursion to
view the Himalayas but your seat has no window. So, during the
flight, we made sure that we corrected the wrong done to him by
trading seats with him so that he had an opportunity to have a
window seat.
We were all deeply offended by what Buddha Air had done to our
friend simply because he was an Indian. Consider the fickleness of
partiality. One day, Buddha Air personnel gave P. J. Mathai
preferential treatment, because he was viewed as an Indian who
could not afford to pay the higher price that we Americans were
expected to pay because they judged us to be wealthy. The next
day, Buddha Air personnel discriminated against him. Because he
was an Indian, whose ticket cost less, he was given a seat with no
window, an obvious violation of Buddha Air’s written guarantee of a
window seat for every passenger.
2
Listen, my friends, partiality is fickle, and it is always sinful. It is
always sinful whether we give a person special treatment because of
ethnic appearance or whether we discriminate against that person
because of ethnic appearance. If we behave favorably or unfavorably
toward fellow humans based upon appearances, we sin against them
and against God.
My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Lord of glory. For if a man wearing a gold ring and fine clothing comes into
your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, and if you
pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, "You sit here in
a good place," while you say to the poor man, "You stand over there," or, "Sit
down at my feet," have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and
become judges with evil thoughts? Listen, my beloved brothers, has not God
chosen those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the
kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him? But you have
dishonored the poor man. Are not the rich the ones who oppress you, and the
ones who drag you into court? Are they not the ones who blaspheme the
honorable name by which you were called?
If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, "You shall love your
neighbor as yourself," you are doing well. But if you show partiality, you are
committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. For whoever
keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become accountable for all of it.
For he who said, "Do not commit adultery," also said, "Do not murder." If you
do not commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the
law.
So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. For
judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs
over judgment.
3
1. James Condemns Showing Partiality as Sin.
For example, the Greek Old Testament in Leviticus 19:15 uses the
two Greek words in combination to capture the Hebrew
expression–“You shall do no unrighteousness in judgment nor shall
you show partiality to the poor, nor shall you defer to the
powerful, but you shall judge your neighbor with righteousness.”
In the New Testament the verb, “to show partiality,” occurs only in
James 2:9. The noun form occurs in James 2:1 and in three other
passages–Romans 2:11, Ephesians 6:9, and Colossians 3:25. These
three passages assert that “there is no partiality with God” when he
judges. A similar form of the noun occurs in Acts 10:34. After seeing
4
that God gave the Holy Spirit to Cornelius’s Gentile family just as he
had done with Jewish believers on Pentecost, Peter declares, “I see
clearly, now, that God is not one to show partiality.”
So, he offers his illustration of the prejudiced usher who seats the
rich man in a choice seat simply because the man has wealth, and
he seats the poor man in the least comfortable and lowliest of seats
simply because the man is poor. Why would we make these
judgments? Is it not for what we might receive in return? Because
the wealthy man almost surely is influential, the usher seats him in
the best seat with the hope that he will take notice and return the
favor, perhaps even some money. Because the poor man almost
surely lacks influence, the usher seats him in the poorest seat.
5
James asks, in verse 4, if you behave this way “have you not
discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil
thoughts?”
For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise
according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; but God has
chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has
chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are
strong, and the base things of the world and the despised God has
chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that
are, so that no man may boast before God.
6
spirit, because theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:3). Both
Jesus and James make the point that only those who come to
acknowledge that they have no influence or power to move God to
favor them shall become rich in what truly matters (cf. James 1:10-
11). The rich can have no trust in their wealth, but the poor can
place no hope in their need as though need favorably moves God to
be partial to them. God is not one to show partiality. God is not
moved to act favorably toward us based on outward appearances.
7
many do in our day, we are patronizing, paternalistic,
condescending, and dehumanizing. We are motivated by what we
might be able to receive in return for our deeds born out of partiality
and often out of intimidation, but always out of selfish motives. To
show partiality, whether to the rich or to the poor, is an attempt to
look righteous in the eyes of others and to receive the praise and
commendation of humans. This is the way of the world. It is anti-
Christian.
Conclusion
8
Let us never borrow from the worldly belief system. Instead, let the
gospel of Jesus Christ shape how we conduct ourselves whether in
the courtroom or along life’s everyday pathways. The world’s way is
the way of Buddha Air. They appeared virtuous by reducing the
ticket price for my friend, P. J. Mathai. The act was not virtuous.
They were not genuinely concerned about P. J. Mathai, the man.
Rightly understood, their act was an patronizing insult to him
because they looked upon him and judged him on outward
appearances, just as they judged him the very next day when they
gave him a seat without a window. They did not treat him as an
individual human being who is made in God’s likeness. Their
treatment of P. J. Mathai was demeaning. They did not treat him
with dignity, as a man made in the image of God. They judged him
on the basis of outward appearance to be simply a member of a
class, a class of people they appeared to favor with partiality one day
with a ticket price discount but they discriminated against him the
next day by placing him in a seat with no window in a full plane.