Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
II. ARGUMENT
Petition.
(see Exhibit “B”) filed with the court of Hawaii on November 16,
that the 2nd Amendment and the pour over Will signed by my
Testamentary capacity has been defined as the ability to know (1) the nature
and extent of the testator or testatrix’s estate. (2) the identify of the
beneficiaries and their relationship, whether by blood or other circumstances,
to the testator or testatrix (i.e., the objects of his or her bounty); (3) the
disposition of the testator or testatrix is making; and (4) how these elements
relate so as to form a rational and orderly plan for the disposition of the
testator or testatrix’s estate. [90 Haw. At 455]
that such a crucial date could be entered in error. This lends to our
3
assertion that the attorney Robert Grigger Jones was exploiting our
disregard with which the Trustee and her attorneys have protracted
by Robert Grigger Jones was altered after our father’s death for
Elizabeth Meek’s argument that our pursuing the validity of the 1st
Griswold that the same 1st Amendment, with out numerated pages,
Bank of Hawaii with the words Atascadero, California, crossed out (See
Exhibit “I”) and the words Honolulu, Hawaii transposed as well as the
deceitful and well versed in the shameful art of fraud. Robert Grigger
2009 in the United States Bankruptcy Court (See Exhibit “K”) wherein
Griswold by her own admission (see Exhibit “A”) has stated that
matter and to the best of my knowledge the only police report that has
been filed regarding the fraud on the 1st Amendment has been filed by
Wilkomm that the FBI cannot confirm or deny they are continuing to
Trust case as well as records reflecting properties sold with the assist
5
4. ELVIN MEEK’S 1996 Declaration of Trust Represented His
merit.
refers to only the 1992 Elvin R Meek and Elizabeth Meek trust of which
Elizabeth Meek in 2004 was nothing more than a vehicle to assist Mrs.
to her has chosen to not communicate with us. (see Exhibit “L”)
Myself, my brother Melvin and daughter Nicole have over the last
contact Elizabeth’s daughter Lola Meek (who has lived out of the
country in Palau since 1999 and utilizes her biological father’s name of
Reklai) without results and have been informed that Lola has chosen
Elizabeth for pictures from our childhood, trinkets and other items
Elizabeth may consider useless but mean a great deal to us, with no
intentionally did not contact family members or long time friends of our
(Reklai) was present during this crucial time and cellular phone
her family members and friends both in the United States and Palau. I
Melvin took the time to have it prepared. It is sincere and heartfelt and
7
expresses his feelings with respect to the 1st Amendment and Elizabeth
Meek as Trustee.
7. California Probate
Elvin Meek had been a resident of Hawaii since 1996 and died in
asking Lola Meek (Reklai) to assist since she was also an American
Citizen. However she has been and continues to live out of the country
in Palau.
remains Elizabeth was present during this meeting and aware of the
stated to myself and to his friend of over 30 years, Wes Stewart, that
was placing monies from his accounts into accounts maintained by the
where Lola Meek (Reklai) was and still is residing. It is for this reason
away. A copy of Wes Stewart’s letter to Elizabeth Meek dated June 28,
attached (Exhibit “O”). Wes Stewart and his wife Nina lived across the
street from the Waipuna where my father resided and yet Elizabeth did
not contact either of them to bear witness to our father signing the
pour over Will. Instead she took my father downstairs and had two
being signed only days before our father lapsed into a coma and
telephone that she was “under strict orders by Mrs. Meek” to not speak
with me.
9
Elizabeth Meek’s arguments are baseless and without merit. We only
Declatory Relief
The facts of the case prior to our having the 1st Amendment scrutinized
have evolved with the most recent forensics report prepared by expert
III. CONCLUSION
without merit. The judgment against the Elvin Meek estate for the
haste have already demonstrated to the court the impunity with which
forgery (Exhibit “P”) and the signature page on the 1st Amendment
invalid;
Elizabeth Meek.
(Jane Peebles during the IRS tax audit) be paid back into
the trust.
Respectfully submitted:
Self Represented
STATE OF HAWAII
12
IN THE MATTER OF ) T. No. 05-1-0101
)
THE ELVIN R MEEK FAMILY TRUST ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
)
DATED JUNE 14, 1996, AS AMENDED )
_______________________________ )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the NANCI L. MEEK’S
RESPONSE TO ELIZABETH A MEEK’S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR
DECLATORY RELIEF DECLARING FIRST AMENDMENT INVALID (FILED ON
AUGUST 14, 2009) EXHIBITS A-S; and attachments was duly served upon the
following individuals by hand delivery, United States Postal service or E mail:
13