Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ducation
Nationale, which is mainly concerned with
the implementation of the national
curriculum; and the Inspection Generale de
l'Administration de l'E
ducation Nationale,
which monitors managerial issues in
education. As in the case of Greece, the
French school inspectors used to work alone
and monitor the performance of individual
teachers as well as the quality of ``school life''.
By the end of the 1980s, however, the two
French inspectorate bodies were asked by the
Minister of Education to collaborate in
investigating the performance of schools.
Thus, for the first time in France, school
inspectors worked in teams for three
successive years and reported on the
performance of a national sample of
secondary schools (lycees, lycees
professionnels, and colleges).
In recent years French schools have been
provided, by the Direction de l'E
valuation et
de la Prospective, with special guidelines for
self-evaluation and review in the form of
performance indicators. The schools now
publish their baccalaureat results in the
newspapers. French researchers in the field
of school effectiveness have added significant
momentum to the conceptualisation of what
[ 161]
Athanasios Verdis,
Thanos Kriemadis and
Petros Pashiardis
Historical, comparative and
statistical perspectives of
school effectiveness
research: rethinking
educational evaluation in
Greece
The International Journal of
Educational Management
17/4 [2003] 155-169
constitutes a good school. Liensol and Meuret
(1987), for example, in one of the first French
school effectiveness studies challenged the
French ``league tables'' in the newspapers by
stressing the need for the publication of
``value added'' school outcomes. As a
consequence of Liensol and Meuret's (1987)
proposals, the ``raw'' baccalaureat results for
each school are now compared against the
``expected'' results. In another study, Duru-
Bellat and Mingat (1987) had argued that the
effectiveness of a school should also be
connected with the probability of its students
passing to grade 8. This proposal also found
its way into the policy domain.
If someone had to choose one single study
that would best represent the link between
school effectiveness and school evaluation in
France, this would be the study of Grisay
(1997). Grisay was asked by the Direction de
l'E
S
c
h
o
o
l
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
D
f
E
E
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
o
n
d
o
n
,
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
o
f
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
G
o
v
e
r
n
i
n
g
b
o
d
i
e
s
a
n
d
t
a
r
g
e
t
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
S
O
E
I
D
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
S
t
r
a
t
h
c
l
y
d
e
a
n
d
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
o
n
d
o
n
,
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
o
f
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
T
h
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
E
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
R
o
b
e
r
t
s
o
n
a
n
d
S
a
m
m
o
n
s
,
1
9
9
7
)
[ 164]
Athanasios Verdis,
Thanos Kriemadis and
Petros Pashiardis
Historical, comparative and
statistical perspectives of
school effectiveness
research: rethinking
educational evaluation in
Greece
The International Journal of
Educational Management
17/4 [2003] 155-169
variation into school-level and student-level.
For example, it was found that 50.4 per cent of
the total variance in reading literacy in
Greece is attributed to the school factor.
However, this is the ``unexplained'' variance.
In order to find the ``net'' school effect, one
has to subtract 40.1 per cent, which is the
between-school variance explained by
geographical, systemic, and institutional
factors, as well as the international socio-
economic index of occupational status of
students and schools. Thus, the ``net'' school
effect for Greece appears to be 10.3 per cent.
This figure is very large for such a
centralised educational system as the Greek
one, which serves a mono-cultural society.
The corresponding figure for the UK, a
country with a decentralised educational
system, is only 4.3 per cent. The OECD
average is 5.6 per cent.
In Greece, the tradition of SER has only
recently been born. In this country schools
have, for years, considered offering the same
quality of education to their students. Greek
educators, however, have started to
reconsider this view, especially after the first
publication of the names of ``best'' and
``worst'' lyceums (senior secondary
comprehensive schools) in the country
(Mastoras, 1999), the sociological studies like
the one from Katsikas (1999) and the
statistical analyses of educational data like
the one of Panaretos (1999). The first school
effectiveness study in Greece was conducted
by Verdis (2002), who analysed Greek
students' scores in the university entrance
examination in the final year of the Greek
eniaia (comprehensive) lyceums and
concluded that ``school matters'' in Greece.
Verdis (2002) analysed the normalised
examination scores (21 subjects) of 30,573
students nested in 375 eniaia lyceia with the
help of linear and non-linear multivariate
multilevel statistical models. It has been
found that large lyceia have better results
than small lyceia and that private lyceia have
better results than state lyceia (Verdis, 2002).
However, the gross intra-school correlation
coefficients are relatively small, averaging
around 10 per cent. When student previous
achievement was taken into account, the
intra-school correlation coefficient fell to 0.2
per cent. This probably means that Greek
lyceums may not be so different after all. The
researcher (Verdis, 2002) also found that
students' previous achievement, socio-
economic status, age, and sex are
significantly correlated with later
achievement. Hierarchical multivariate
models showed that the Greek ``shadow
education'' system of parapaedeia has a
significant impact on certain academic
outcomes especially for those connected
with procedural and not declarative
knowledge. Students' views of teachers'
responsiveness in the classroom are
positively correlated with their academic
achievement. Though teachers are not
satisfied with their salary and living
standards, they have good relationships with
their colleagues and find teaching to be an
exciting job. Many students feel alienated in
the schools, mainly because interpersonal
relations are competitive. Finally, the
condition of the school building and the
behaviour of some of the teachers are the
main reasons why many lyceum students
would change their school (Verdis, 2002). The
author (Verdis, 2002) concluded in that study
by suggesting that a decentralised
framework for monitoring the quality of
schooling could fill the gap of educational
evaluation in Greece.
7. Epilogue
This paper has presented the history and
recent development of SER, an international
research movement. Special attention has
been given to three European countries:
France, England, and Greece. The idea that
emerges from this piece of research is that
the future of this significant research
movement is not simply through more
complex statistical analyses and large
international studies. The way forward for
the years to come passes through a study of
the particularities of the context of each
educational system, its history, tradition and
local needs. The quest for school
effectiveness can be better conducted at the
local level. This is the only way in which
school effectiveness will continue to be an
interesting area of inquiry at an
international level. It was also shown how
SER has just been born in countries like
Greece and Cyprus. The future of SE in these
countries seems to be promising, if these
educational systems avoid mistakes of the
past and concentrate on the individual
school, the individual classroom and the
individual teacher. The next wave of SER
will certainly show that classrooms matter
and teachers matter.
References
Aitkin, M. and Longford, N. (1986), ``Statistical
modelling issues in school effectiveness
studies'', Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society, Vol. 149 No. 1, pp. 1-43.
Aitkin, M., Anderson, D. and Hinde, J. (1981),
``Statistical modelling of data on teaching
[ 165]
Athanasios Verdis,
Thanos Kriemadis and
Petros Pashiardis
Historical, comparative and
statistical perspectives of
school effectiveness
research: rethinking
educational evaluation in
Greece
The International Journal of
Educational Management
17/4 [2003] 155-169
styles (with discussion)'', Journal of the Royal
Statistical Society, Vol. A No. 144, pp. 148-61.
Ballion, R. (1991), La bonne ecole, Hatier, Paris.
Bashi, J. and Zehava, S. (Eds) (1992), School
Effectiveness and School Improvement:
Proceedings of the Third International
Congress for School Effectiveness, Magness
Press, Jerusalem.
Bennett, N. (1976), Teaching Styles and Pupil
Progress, Open Books, London.
Bock, D.R. (Ed.) (1989), Multilevel Analysis of
Educational Data, Academic Press, Inc.,
London.
Bosker, R.J. (1990), ``Extra Kansen dankzij de
school'' (``Does the school provide more
chances''), unpublished PhD, Institute voor
Toegepaste Sociale Wetenschappen,
Nijmegen.
Brandsma, H., Edelenbos, P. and Bosker, R. (1995),
Effecten van Trainingen voor Docenten en
Schoolleiders (The Effects of Training
Programmes for Teachers and School
Leaders), RION/OCTO, Groningen/Enschede.
Brimer, A., Madaus, G.F., Chapman, B.,
Kellaghan, T. and Woodrof, R. (1978), Sources
of Differences in School Achievement,
NFER-Nelson, Slough.
Brookover, W.B., Beady, C., Flood, P. and
Schweitzer, J. (1979), School Systems, Student
Achievement: School Can Make a Difference,
Praeger, New York, NY.
Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C.,
McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F. and
York, R. (1966), Equality of Educational
Opportunity, US Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC.
Creemers, B. (1994), The Effective Classroom,
Cassell, London.
Creemers, B. (1996), ``The school effectiveness
knowledge base'', in Reynolds, D., Bollen, R.,
Creemers, B., Hopkins, D., Stoll, L. and
Lagerweij, N. (Eds), Making Good Schools:
Linking School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, Routledge, London.
Creemers, B. and Osinga, N. (Eds), (1995), ICSEI
Country Reports, ICSEI Secretariat,
Leeuwarden.
Creemers, B. and Reezigt, G. (1996), ``School level
conditions affecting the effectiveness of
instruction'', School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 197-228.
Creemers, B., Peters, T. and Reynolds, D. (Eds)
(1989), School Effectiveness and School
Improvement: Selected Proceedings of the
Second International Congress, Swets and
Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.
Daly, P. (1991), ``How large are secondary school
effects in Northern Ireland?'', School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 2
No. 4, pp. 305-23.
Daly, P. (1995), ``Public accountability and the
academic effectiveness of grant-aided catholic
schools'', School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 367-79.
Derouet, J. (1987), ``Approaches ethnographiques
en sociologie de l'education: l'ecole, la
communaute, l'etablissement scolaire, la
classe'', Revue Francaise de Pedagogie, Vol. 78.
De Vos, H. (1998), Educational Effects: A
Simulation-Based Analysis, University of
Twente, Enschede.
Duru-Bellat, M. and Mingat, A. (1987), ``Facteurs
institutionnels de la diversite des carrieres
scolaires'', Revue Francaise de Sociologie,
Vol. 28 No. 1.
Edmonds, R. (1979), ``Effective schools for the
urban poor'', Educational Leadership, Vol. 37
No. 1, pp. 16-18.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1991), ``Multi-level modeling in an
indicator system'', in Raudenbush, S. and
Willms, D. (Eds), Schools, Classrooms and
Pupils: International Studies of Schooling
froma Multilevel Perspective, Academic Press,
San Diego, CA, pp. 67-84.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1992), ``School effects at A-level
genesis of an information system'', in
Raynolds, D. and Cuttance, P. (Eds), School
Effectiveness: Research Policy and Practice,
Cassell, London.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1996), Issues to be Considered in
the Design of a National Value Added Project,
Schools Curriculum and Assessment
Authority, London.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1997), The Value Added National
Project Final Report, Schools Curriculum and
Assessment Authority, London.
Goldstein, H. (1980), ``Critical notice `fifteen
thousand hours' '', Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp.
364-6.
Goldstein, H. (1986), ``Multilevel mixed linear
models analysis using iterative generalised
least squares'', Biometrica, Vol. 73 No. 1,
pp. 57-64.
Goldstein, H. (1987), Multilevel Models in
Educational and Social Research, Oxford
University Press, London.
Goldstein, H. (1995), Multilevel Models in
Educational and Social Research: A Revised
Edition, Edward Arnold, London.
Goldstein, H. and Myers, K. (1997), ``School
effectiveness research: a bandwagon, a
hi-jack or a journey towards enlightenment?'',
paper presented at the Annual Conference of
the British Educational Research
Association, 11-14 September, York.
Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Yang, M., Woodhouse,
G., Pan, H., Nuttall, D. and Thomas, S. (1993),
``A multilevel analysis of school examination
results'', Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 19
No. 4, pp. 425-33.
Gray, J. and Wilcox, B. (Eds) (1995), Good School,
Bad School, Open University Press,
Buckingham.
[ 166]
Athanasios Verdis,
Thanos Kriemadis and
Petros Pashiardis
Historical, comparative and
statistical perspectives of
school effectiveness
research: rethinking
educational evaluation in
Greece
The International Journal of
Educational Management
17/4 [2003] 155-169
Gray, J., Jesson, D. and Sime, N. (1990),
``Estimating differences in the examination
performances of secondary schools in six
LEAs: a multi-level approach to school
effectiveness'', Oxford Review of Education,
Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 137-58.
Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B.,
Farrell, S. and Jesson, D. (1999), Improving
Schools: Performance and Potential, Open
University Press, Buckingham.
Grisay, A. (1997), Evolution des acquis cognitifs et
socio-affectifs des eleves au cours des annees de
college (Evolution of Cognitive and Affective
Development in Lower Secondary Education),
Direction de l' Evaluation et de la
Prospective.
Harris, A., Jamieson, I. and Russ, J. (1995), ``A
study of effective departments in secondary
schools'', School Organisation, Vol. 15 No. 3,
pp. 283-99.
Harris, A., Jamieson, I., Pearce, D. and Russ, J.
(1997), Equipping Young People for Working
Life: Effective Teaching and Learning through
Work Related Contexts, DfEE Research
Papers, HMSO, London.
Hill, W.P., Rowe, K.J. and Holmes-Smith, P. (1993),
``Factors affecting students' educational
progress: multilevel modelling of educational
effectiveness'', paper presented at the 8th
International Congress for School
Effectiveness and Improvement, Leeuwarden,
January.
Jencks, C.S., Smith, M., Ackland, H., Bane, M.J.,
Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B. and
Michoslon, S. (1972), Inequality: A
Reassessment of the Effect of Family and
Schooling in America, Basic Books,
New York, NY.
Jesson, D. and Gray, J. (1991), ``Slants on slopes:
Using multi-level models to investigate
differential school effectiveness and its
impact on pupils' examination results'',
School Effectiveness and School Improvement,
Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 230-47.
Katsikas, C. (1999), ``Educational inequalities in
the same neighbourhood!'', Ta Nea, 14
August, pp. 14-15.
Lam, M. and van der Grift, W. (1995), ``Het
didastisch handelen in het basisonderwijs''
(``Teaching strategies in primary education''),
Onderwijs-researchdagen, 19-21 June,
Groningen.
Liensol, B. and Meuret, D. (1987), ``Les
performances des lycees publics et prives
pour la preparation au baccalaureat'',
Education et Formations, Vol. 12, Ministere de
la education Nationale Direction de
l'Evaluation et de la Prospective, Paris.
Lindley, D.V. and Smith, A.F.M. (1972), ``Bayes
estimates for the linear model'', Journal of
the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. B No. 34,
pp. 1-41.
Luyten, H. (1994), School Effects: Stability and
Malleability, University of Twente, Enschede.
Mastoras, N. (1999), ``The 163 distinguished
lyceums'', Ta Nea, 4 August, pp. 12-13.
McGaw, B., Piper, J., Banks, D. and Evans, B.
(1992), Making Schools More Effective,
Australian Council for Educational Research,
Hawthorn.
Meuret, D. (1995), ``Schools and the production of
inequalities: the case of French junior
secondary schools'', paper presented at the
ICSEI Congress Leeuwarden, January.
Meuret, D. and Marivain, T. (1997), ``Inequalities
and conditions of well being in French junior
secondary schools'', paper presented at the
ICSEI Congress, Memphis, TN.
Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D.
and Ecob, R. (1988), School Matters: The
Junior Years, Open Books, Holwell.
OECD-CERI (1995), Schools under Scrutiny,
OECD-CERI, Paris.
Panaretos, I. (1999), ``Students in the Greek
periphery are looking for better schools in
cities'', Saturday 18 December, To Vima,
pp. A22-23.
Paty, D. (1980), Douze colleges en France, La
documentation francaise, Paris.
PhiDeltaKappa (1980), Why Do Some Urban
Schools Succeed?, Phi Delta Kappa,
Bloomington, IN.
PISA (2000), Programme for International Student
Association, OECD, Paris.
Plowden (Ludy) and Committee (1967), Children
and their Primary Schools, HMSO, London.
Power, M.J. (1967), ``Delinquent schools'',
New Society, Vol. 10, pp. 542-3.
Purkey, S. and Smith, M. (1983), ``Effective
schools: a review'', The Elementary School
Journal, Vol. 83 No. 4, pp. 427-52.
Raudenbush, S. and Bryk, A. (1986), ``A
hierarchical model for studying school
effects'', Sociology of Education, Vol. 59,
pp. 1-17.
Raudenbush, S.W. and Willms, D.J. (Eds), (1991),
Schools, Classrooms and Pupils. International
Studies of Schooling from a Multilevel
Perspective, Academic Press, Inc., London.
Reezigt, G. (1993), Effecten van Differentiate op de
Basisschool (Effects of Grouping in Primary
Education), RION, Groningen.
Reynolds, D. (1996), ``Turning around ineffective
schools: some evidence and some
speculations'', in Gray, J., Reynolds, D.,
Fitz-Gibbon, C. and Jesson, D. (Eds), Merging
Traditions: The Future of Research on School
Effectiveness and School Improvement,
Cassell, London.
Reynolds, D. and Farrell, S. (1996), Worlds Apart?
A Review of International Surveys of
Educational Achievement Involving England,
OFSTED review of research, HMSO, London.
[ 167]
Athanasios Verdis,
Thanos Kriemadis and
Petros Pashiardis
Historical, comparative and
statistical perspectives of
school effectiveness
research: rethinking
educational evaluation in
Greece
The International Journal of
Educational Management
17/4 [2003] 155-169
Reynolds, D., Creemers, B. and Peters, T. (1989),
School Effectiveness and School Improvement:
Proceedings of the First Congress, School of
Education, University of Cardiff and
RION Institute for Educational Research,
Cardiff.
Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C., Creemers, B.,
Scheerens, J. and Townsend, T. (2000), ``An
introduction to school effectiveness
research'', in C. Teddlie and D. Reynolds
(Eds), The International Handbook of
School Effectiveness Research, Falmer Press,
London.
Reynolds, D., Creemers, B.P.M., Nesselrodt, P.S.,
Schaffer, E.C., Stringfield, S. and Teddlie, S.
(Eds) (1994), Advances in School Effectiveness
Research and Practice, Elsevier Science,
Oxford.
Robertson, P. and Sammons, P. (1997), ``Improving
school effectiveness: a project in progress'',
mimeograph, Institute of Education, London.
Ros, A. (1994), Samenwerking Tussen Leerlingen
en Effectief Onderwijs: De Invloed van de
Leerkracht (Collaboration Between Students
and Effective Education), RION, Groningen.
Rowe, K. (1991), Students, Parents, Teachers and
Schools Make a Difference: A Summary Report
of Major Findings from the 100 Schools
Project Literacy Programs Study, School
Programs Division, Ministry of Education,
Melbourne.
Rowe, K., Hill, P. and Holmes-Smith, P. (1994),
``Assessing, recording and reporting students,
educational progress: the case for profiles'',
paper presented at the 1994 Annual
Conference of the Australian Association for
Research in Education, Newcastle,
November-December.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P. and
Ouston, J. (1979), Fifteen Thousand Hours:
Secondary Schools and Their Effects on
Children, Open Books Ltd, Holwell.
Sacre, A. (1997), ``Une approche du ro le de la
direction dans l'efficalite des colleges'',
Education et Formations, p. 49.
Sammons, P. (1996), ``Complexities in the
judgement of school effectiveness'',
Educational Research and Evaluation, Vol. 2
No. 2, pp. 113-49.
Sammons, P. and Reynolds, D. (1997), ``A partisan
Evaluation John Elliot of school
effectiveness'', Cambridge Journal of
Education, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 123-36.
Sammons, P., Nuttall, D. and Cuttance, P. (1993),
``Differential school effectiveness: results
from a reanalysis of the Inner London
Education Authority's Junior School Project
data'', British Educational Research Journal,
Vol. 19, pp. 381-405.
Sammons, P., Thomas, S. and Mortimore, P.
(1996), ``Differential school effectiveness:
department variations in GCSE attainment'',
paper presented at the American Educational
Research Association Annual Conference,
New York, NY.
Sammons, P., Nuttall, D., Cuttance, P. and
Thomas, S. (1995), ``Continuity of school
effects: a longitudinal analysis of primary and
secondary school effects on GCSE
performance'', School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 285-307.
Samouilidi, M. (1995), ``Evaluation of the
organisational effectiveness of the integrated
multifarious lyceum Greece: a process
approach'', unpublished PhD, University of
Hull, Hull.
Sarason, S. (1981), The Culture of School and the
Problem of Educational Change, Allyn and
Bacon, Boston, MA.
Sebba, J., Clarke, J. and Emery, B. (1996),
Enhancing School Improvement Through
Inspection in Special Schools: Report of the
Project on Post-Inspection Action Planning
and School Improvement Following Inspection
in Special Schools, OFSTED, HMSO, London.
Smith, D. and Tomlinson, S. (1989), The School
Effect: A Study of Multi-racial
Comprehensives, Policy Studies Institute,
London.
Stoll, L. and Myers, K. (1997), No Quick Fixes:
Perspectives on Schools in Difficulty, Falmer
Press, Lewes.
Stoll, L. and Riley, K. (1999), ``From infancy to
adolescence: school effectiveness and school
improvement in England since 1995'', in
Townsend, T., Clarke, P. and Ainscow, M.
(Eds), Third Millennium Schools: A World
of Difference in Effectiveness and
Improvement, Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse.
Teddlie, C. and Reynolds, D. (Eds) (2000), The
International Handbook of School
Effectiveness Research, Falmer Press, London.
Teddlie, C. and Stringfield, S. (1993), Schools Do
Make a Difference: Lessons Learned from a
10-year Study of School Effects, Teachers
College Press, Columbia University,
Columbia, OH.
Thomas, S., Sammons, P. and Mortimore, P.
(1994), ``Stability in secondary schools: effects
on students GCSE outcomes'', paper
presented at the Annual Conference of the
British Educational Research Association,
Oxford.
Thomas, S., Sammons, P., Mortimore, P. and
Smees, R. (1997), ``Stability and consistency in
secondary schools' effects on students' GCSE
outcomes in three years'', School Effectiveness
and School Improvement, Vol. 8 No. 2,
pp. 169-17.
Tizard, B., Burgess, T., Francis, H., Goldstein, H.,
Young, M., Hewison, J. and Plewis, I. (1980),
Fifteen Thousand Hours: A Discussion,
London Institute of Education, London.
[ 168]
Athanasios Verdis,
Thanos Kriemadis and
Petros Pashiardis
Historical, comparative and
statistical perspectives of
school effectiveness
research: rethinking
educational evaluation in
Greece
The International Journal of
Educational Management
17/4 [2003] 155-169
Townsend, T. (Ed.) (1997), Restructuring and
Quality: Issues for Tomorrow's Schools,
Routledge, London.
Townsend, T., Clarke, P. and Ainscow, M. (Eds)
(1999), Third Millennium Schools: A World of
Difference in Effectiveness and Improvement,
Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse.
Tymms, P. and Williams, D. (1996), Baseline
Assessment and Value-added, School
Curriculum and Assessment Authority,
London.
van de Grift, W. (1990), ``Educational leadership
and academic achievement in secondary
education'', School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 26-40.
Verdis, A. (2002), ``School effectiveness research
for educational evaluation in Greece'',
unpublished PhD, London Institute of
Education, London.
Weber, G. (1971), Inner School Children Can Be
Taught to Read: Four Successful Schools,
Council for Basic Education, Washington, DC.
[ 169]
Athanasios Verdis,
Thanos Kriemadis and
Petros Pashiardis
Historical, comparative and
statistical perspectives of
school effectiveness
research: rethinking
educational evaluation in
Greece
The International Journal of
Educational Management
17/4 [2003] 155-169