Rebecca Savage RN Bethel College Abstract More that 7 million Americans living with dementia (Alzheimers Association, 2013). Every 68 seconds someone is diagnosed. Many become a burden to family leads to Long-term placement. High incidence of depression, decrease socialization and engagement. Goal is to improve overall well being. CDC reports 3.2 million residents reside in LTC. (CDC, 2013). Often lack skills for successful communication Often placed in LTC because families can not manage dementia related behaviors (Kolanowski, 2006). Inactivity or low levels of engagement contribute to poor overall well being (Buettner-Fitzsimmons, 2011) Statement of the Problem Decreased social interactions Depression Decreased Engagement All affect overall well being. (Gonzalez-Salvador,2000). Conceptual Framework of Pet Visitations Overall wellbeing of Residents Engagement Socialization Depression Purpose of the Study Explore the effect of pet visitations. Improve social interactions Decrease signs and symptoms of depression. Improve overall well-being. Find alternative ways to reduce negative behaviors. Variables affecting residents overall well-being
Pet Visitations Independent Variable Engagement Socialization Decrease signs/symptoms of depression Overall wellbeing improved Independent Variables Research Questions 1. Based on the theory of human energy field, will providing scheduled pet visitations decrease signs and symptoms of depression? 2. Can providing pet visitations increase socialization by decreasing the occurrence of negative behaviors in dementia patients? 3. Can providing pet visitations improve engagement in patients with dementia?
Hypotheses Ho= Pet visitations will improve the well being in residents with dementia by decreasing signs and symptoms of depression, decreasing incidences of socially unaccepted behaviors and improving residents engagement. H1 = Pet visitation will not improve the well being in residents with dementia by decreasing signs and symptoms of depression, decreasing incidences of socially unaccepted behaviors and improving residents engagement Definition of terms Well-being= defined in terms of health and happiness. Engagement= the act of involvement in your surroundings, participation (Worden, 2013). Socialization= participation, the act of learning or positively engaging with others. Depression= depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure in usual activities. May display negative behaviors. Theoretical Framework Martha Rogers philosophy of unitary thinking. The patient and their universe interact as a whole (Rogers, 1970). Believed everything in patients universe impacted health and well-being. Proposed research= introducing a pet into the patients universe to improve overall well-being.. Literature Review Ebscohost and CINAHL database. Key words= dog therapy, nursing home residents, dementia, engagement, pet visitation, elderly, engagement, depression, socialization, activities, and behavior management. 42 articles reviewed. Full text articles, written or translated in English. Theoretical Literature Managing behaviors in dementia is challenging aspect to care (Gitlin, 2010) Pharmacological treatments often treatment of choice. 90% dementia residents experience some behavior or psychological symptoms Restlessness, depression, anxiety, hallucinations, delusions and psychosis common (LTCCC, 2013) Cont. Antipsychotic use can be harmful. Increase in sedation, dizziness which leads to falls. Strong link between negative behaviors and decrease in socialization (Cipriani, 2011). 50% of dementia patients suffer depression (Sink, 2005). Study suggested pleasurable stimuli can increase engagement (Cohen-Manfield et al, 2010) Empirical Literature ENGAGEMENT Kolanowski studied using Rogers methodology. 30 LTC residents with dementia, 12 days, 20 minute activity sessions. 2 control groups, planned activities vs. no planned activities. Study showed improvement in engagement influences overall well-being. Depression Sink et al, studied the impact of animal-assisted therapy on eight female LTC residents with dementia. Used state assessment tool. No significant difference in mood or depression, improvement noted in apathy. 63% of participants wanted to continue activity, stated they liked the dogs. Pilot study in Australia Group setting 6 week long study Variety of animals used in study. No improvement noted in depression. Participants verbalized a decrease in loneliness. Socialization Hall and Malpus (2002) examined effects of pet therapy with psychiatric patients. 4 residents where chosen and sessions were video taped. Coders tallied the presence of designated behaviors. Behaviors targeted were noted decreased. Animal assisted therapy has potential to improve overall wellbeing (Sellers,2008). The literature shows range of benefits from pet therapy. Improved engagement (Kolanowski, 2006) Social interactions (Motomura, 2004) Play, laughter, comfort and enjoyment (Hall and Malpus, 2002) Methodology Research Design This study will be correlational quasi-experimental. Use Martha Rogers theory of human energy field as guidance. Data collected pre and post pet visitations. Pet visitations will last 12 weeks, 2 one hour visits each week.
Intervention Experienced volunteers Canine Good Citizen certifications Same pet and handler each week. Pet will be between 50-60 lbs. Group setting consisting of 24 residents. Sampling Purposive sampling Inclusive criteria, diagnosis of dementia and reside on unit. Exclusion criteria, residents admitted to unit after study has started and/or no consent on file. Average age 67-92 years old. 20 female participants, 4 male 20 Caucasian, 3 African Americans and 1 Hispanic.
Setting Will be conducted in Elkhart, IN. All participants reside in LTC facility and are on secure unit. Instrumentation Minimum Data Set (MDS) Contains items to measure: Physical well-being Current clinical issues Psychological factors like dementia or depression Psycho-social functioning Documented behaviors Mini mental state examination (MMSE) Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Daily activity attendance records. Monthly behavioral flow records. PRN psychotropic medication usage Data Collection/Analysis Procedure Data will be collected on 2 occasions. One week prior to pet visitations (baseline). 2 weeks after the pet visitations completed. Researcher who is RN will obtain data. McNemar analytical analysis of data. Independent variable (Pet visitations) can be affected by the dependent variables (depression, engagement and socialization). Protection of Human Rights Will not be conducted until approval received from Bethel College IRB. Voluntary participation. Will obtain written consents from all participants power of attorney (POA). Known risks- allergy to dog, fear of dog. All participants will be assigned a number to protect confidentiality. Cont. Researcher to keep confidential code book. No identifying data will be reported. Data collected will be kept in locked file for a minimum of three years. Study and information pertaining to it will be kept on password protected flash drive. Significance of Study Number of those diagnosed with dementia continues to grow. Explore non-pharmological interventions Improve overall well-being, while keeping them safe.
References
Alzheimer's Association (2013). (Accessed February 18, 204). www.alz.org Barron, A.M., Coakley, A.B., Fitzgerald, E. (2008). Integrating therapeutic touch in Nursing practice on an inpatient oncology and bone marrow transplant unit : An exploratory study. International Journal of Human Caring. 4(12): 124-132. Bates-Jensen B. M., Alessi C. A., Cadogan M. (2004). The minimum data set bedfast quality indicator: Differences among nursing homes. Nursing Resource. 53(4): 260-272. Baun, M.M., (2009), Physiologic effects of the human/companion animal bonding. Nursing Research. 33(3):126-129. Butcher H. K. (Ed). The Science of Unitary Human Beings: Theoretical basis for nursing. (Accessed February 11, 2014). http://rogeriannursingscience.wikispaces.com/. Buettner, L. L., Fitzsimmons, S., & Barba, B. (2011). Animal-assisted therapy for clients with dementia: Nurses Role. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 37(5), 10-14. Center for Advancing Health. (2013). (Accessed March 8, 2014). www.cfah.org. References Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). (Accessed February 18, 2014). www.cdc.org Center for Health and Healing. (Accessed February 18, 2014). http://www.healthandhealingny.org/complement/therap_history.html Cipriani, J. Cooper, M. & DiGiaovanni,M.M. (2011). Dog-assisted therapy for residents of long-term care facilities: an evidence-based review with implications for Occupational therapy. Physical and Occupational therapy in geriatrics 31(30):214-240. Cohen-Mansfield J., Libin A., Marx M. S. (2007). Non-pharmacological treatment of agitation: a controlled trial of systematic individualized intervention. Journal of Gerontology Services, 62(8): 908-916. Cohen-Mansfield J., Marx M., Regier N., Dakheel-Ali M. (2009). The impact of personal characteristics on engagement in nursing home residents with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24(7), 755-763. Duxbury.J.J., (2013). Staff and relatives perspectives on the aggressive behavior of older people with dementia in residential care: A qualitative study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20(9),792-800. Gitlin, L.N. (2010). Targeting and Managing behavioral symptoms in individuals with dementia: a randomized trial of a non- pharmacological intervention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 58(8). 1464-1474. References Gonzalez-Salvador T., Lydetsos, C. G., Baker A. (2000). Quality of life in dementia patients in long-term care. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15(2):181-189. Gunther, Mary E. (2010).Unitary human beings. In M.A. Alligood & A.M. Tomey (Eds.), Nursing theorist and their work (7 th ed. pp. 242-263). Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby Elsevier. Kolanowski, A., Litaker, M. (2006). Social interaction, premorbid personality, and agitation in nursing home residents with dementia. Arch Psychiatric Nursing 20(1): 12-20. Lemke, S. Moos, R.H. (1986). Quality of residential settings for elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology. 41(2): 268-276. Lewis, D. B. (Ed.). (1996). Aging: The health care challenge (2 nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Long Term Care Community Coalition. (2013). www.ltccc.org. retrieval date 03/10/14. Marx, M. S., (2010). The impact of different dog-related stimuli on engagement of person with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and other Dementias.25(1). 37-45. References National Institute on Aging/Nation Institutes of Health (2000). Progress report on Alzheimers disease. (Report No. 00-4859). Silver Spring, MD. Sink, K.M., Holden K.F., Yaffee K. (2005). Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of evidence. JAMA 12(54). 596-608. Smith M.C. (1999). Caring and the science of unitary human beings. Advanced Nursing Science 21(4):14-28. Williams, E., & Jenkins, R. (2008). Dog visitation therapy in dementia car: a literature review. Nursing Older People, 20 (8), 31-35.