Const r uc t i on

Met hod
Const r uc t i on
Met hod
Agenda
Main Dike Construction
Overview of Main Dike Alternatives Analysis
Recommended Alternative
Construction Sequence
Dike Alternatives Analysis
VPA Requested an Evaluation of
Alternatives
Reduce Cost?
Reduce Sand Required?
Improve Constructability?
Minimize Future Settlements?
Main Dike Alternatives
Over 20 Alternatives were Considered for
the Main Dike/Retaining Structure
11 Determined Technically Preferable
Technically Preferable
B1 Rock/Sand Dike, pre-dredge soft clays
B2 Rock/Sand Dike, pre-dredge to -65 feet, Deep Soil Mixing to -100 feet +/-
D1 Partial Height Concrete Caisson, pre-dredge to -100, backfill with sand/rock to -
60, place caisson
D2 Partial Height Concrete Caisson, with deep soil mixing
D3 Partial Height Concrete Caisson, with sand backfill
E1 Cellular Cofferdam, pre-dredge to -100, backfill (sand/rock) to -60, install steel
sheets.
E2 Cellular Cofferdam, with deep soil mixing
F1 Combi-Wall, with deep soil mixing
F2 Portal Frame, with deep soil mixing outside toe
F3 Portal Frame, with deep soil mixing outside and inside
F4 Portal Frame, with link beam, no DSM
Di k e Al t er nat i ves Eval uat ed
Base Case
Dike Section (as Presented in Feasibility Report)
Yorktown Formation
(Dense Silty Sand)
Foundation
(Soft Clay)
Sand Fill
Dredged Fill
Rip Rap
700 Ft. (213 m)
14 Million CY of Sand
Pre-Dredge to -60
Rock/Sand Dikes
Rock/Sand Dike
Alternative B1
Yorktown Formation
Foundation
(Soft Clay)
Pre-Dredge
Pre-dredge
-80 to
-130
Sand Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Rock/Sand Dike
Alternative B1
Surcharge
Pile Supported
Wharf
Dredge Fill
Rock/Sand Dike
Alternative B1
Rock/Sand Dike On DSM
Alternative B
Yorktown Formation
Foundation
(Soft Clay)
Pre-Dredge Bathtub
for DSMEquipment
Deep Soil
Mixed Zone
Deep Soil
Mixed
Pattern
Plan
Quarry Run Rock
Rock/Sand Dike On DSM
Alternative B
Precast Concrete Caissons
Alternatives D1, D2 and D3
Deltaport , Vancouver Port Authority
Precast Concrete Caissons
Sand Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Partial Height Caisson On Rock Fill
Alternative D1
Pre-dredge
-80 to
-130
Concrete Caisson
Partial Height Caisson On Rock Fill
Alternative D1
Yorktown Formation
(Dense Silty Sand)
Foundation
(Soft Clay)
Sand Fill
Dredge Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Concrete Caisson
Partial Height Caisson On Rock Fill
Alternative D1
Concrete Caisson
On Rock Pad
Partial Height Caisson On DSM
Alternative D2
Pre-Dredge After DSM
Deep Soil
Mixed Zone
Sand Fill
Dredge Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Concrete Caisson
Partial Height Caisson On DSM
Alternative D2
Sand Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Partial Height Caisson Sand Fill
Alternative D3
Pre-dredge
-80 to
-130
Sand Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Concrete Caisson
Partial Height Caisson Sand Fill
Alternative D3
Cellular Cofferdams
Alternatives E1 and E2
Sand Fill
Sand Fill
Cellular Cofferdam
Cellular Cofferdam
Alternative E1
Pre-dredge
-80 to
-130
Sand Fill
Dredge Fill
Surcharge
Cellular Cofferdam
Alternative E1
Cellular Cofferdam On DSM
Alternative E2
Yorktown Formation
Foundation
(Soft Clay)
Pre-Dredge Bathtub
for DSMEquipment
Deep Soil
Mixed Zone
Sand Fill
Dredge Fill
Surcharge
Cellular Cofferdam On DSM
Alternative E2
Cellular Cofferdam
Combi-Wall
Pre-Dredge After DSM
Deep Soil
Mixed Zone
Combi-Wall With DSM
Alternative F1
Combi-Wall
Sand Fill
Combi-Wall With DSM
Alternative F1
Install CIP Pile Cap
and P/S Conc Sheet
Pile Wall
Portal Frame With Partial DSM
Alternative F2
Install 72Dia. Steel
Pipe Piles
Pre-Dredge After DSM
Deep Soil
Mixed Zone
Portal Frame With Partial DSM
Alternative F2
Sand Fill
Dredge Fill
Surcharge
Portal Frame With Partial DSM
Alternative F2
Deep Soil
Mixed Zone
Portal Frame With DSM
Alternative F3
CIP Pile Cap and AZ26
Sheet Pile Wall
54Dia. P/S
Conc. Piles
Alternative F3
Portal Frame With DSM
Sand Fill
Dredge Fill
Surcharge
Cast Link Beam
(El. -15)
Cast Pile Caps
Install P/S Conc
Sheet Pile Wall
Portal Frame With Link Beam
Alternative F4
72Dia. Steel Pipe
Piles for Portal
Frame
Alternative F4
Portal Frame With Link Beam
Sand Fill
Dredge Fill
Surcharge
Wick Drains
Evaluation of Alternatives
Technical Feasible Alternatives Were:
Ranked by Cost
Evaluated by Risk
Factors to Evaluate Risk
1. Price Risk.
Materials and/or labor fluctuations
2. Constructability & Precedence.
Difficulty to construct.
3. Material Sourcing (Sand/Rock).
Construction materials availability.
4. Permit Risk.
Potential to delay permit process.
Factors to Evaluate Risk
5. Schedule Risk.
Hold-up rapid filling of cell.
6. Impact on Dredged Material Capacity.
Net storage capacity of Craney
7. Design Life.
Design life / maintenance requirements.
Costs / Risks
Short Name

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
s
t

-

N
o

W
h
a
r
f

P
r
i
c
e

R
i
s
k
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y

&

P
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
c
e
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

S
o
u
r
c
i
n
g

(
s
a
n
d
/
r
o
c
k
)
P
e
r
m
i
t

R
i
s
k
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

R
i
s
k
I
m
p
a
c
t

o
n

D
r
e
d
g
e

M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n

L
i
f
e
A
v
g
.

R
i
s
k
B1 Rock/Sand
$ 563,568,614 1 1 4 3 1 5 1 2.3
B2 Rock/DSM
$ 767,100,826 4 3 2 5 5 1 1 3.0
D1 Caisson/Rock
$ 746,844,645 2 2 5 3 1 5 2 2.9
D2
Caisson/DSM
$ 992,479,519 5 5 3 5 5 1 2 3.7
D3
Caisson/Sand
$ 707,159,632 2 2 5 2 1 5 2 2.7
E1 Steel Cellular
$ 631,847,815 4 4 5 2 1 5 5 3.7
E2
Cellular/DSM
$ 828,473,261 5 5 3 5 5 1 5 4.1
F1
Combi-Wall
$ 944,660,155 4 3 1 3 3 1 5 2.9
F2
Portal Frame F2
$ 917,336,324 4 4 1 3 3 1 4 2.9
F3
Portal Frame F3
$ 660,094,688 5 5 1 4 4 1 5 3.6
F4
Portal Frame F4
$ 767,486,860 3 3 1 1 1 1 4 2.0
B1 Rock/Sand
B2 Rock/DSM
D1 Caisson/Rock
D2 Caisson/DSM
D3 Caisson/Sand
E1 Steel Cellular
E2 Cellular/DSM
F1 Combi-Wall
F2 Portal Frame
F3 Portal Frame
F4 Portal Frame
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
$700,000,000
$800,000,000
$900,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$1,100,000,000
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0
(less risk) - <------- Risk -----> + (more risk)
C
o
s
t

(
8
,
5
0
0

L
F
)

(
B
a
s
e
d

o
n

A
s
s
u
m
e
d

S
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e

i
n

P
h
a
s
e

1
)
Cost vs Risks
Main Dike Alternatives Report
Main Dike Alternatives
Analysis Report
Available for Download:
http://craneyisland.info/Contractors.html
Agenda
Main Dike Construction
Overview of Main Dike Alternatives Analysis
Recommended Alternative
Construction Sequence
CIDMMA
S
h
i
p
p
i
n
g

C
h
a
n
n
e
l
Existing Conditions
Pre-Dredging
Current Design
Rock/Sand Dike
15.7 MCY Pre-Dredge
(Total Length)
Main Dike Construction
Current Design
Rock/Sand Dike
6.3 MCY Sand
(Total Length)
Cross Dike Construction
Dredge Depth After
Construction
Pre-Dredging to the North
Filling South Cell
6.5 MCY
Construct North Dike
Filling North Cell
12.5 MCY
Achieving Final Grade
Above +18
25 MCY
CIEE South & North Cell
Access Channel Dredging
8.3 MCY
Conclusion - Dikes
Component Quantity
Pre-Dredging 15.7 MCY
Access Channel Dredging 8.3 MCY
Sand Fill - Main Dike 6.3 MCY
Sand Fill - Cross Dikes 4.5 MCY
Quarry Run Rock 6.3 Million Tons
Rock/Sand Dike for Main Dike
Dredging, Sand and Rock Volumes