0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
18 visualizzazioni34 pagine
Recent Advances in Critical Care Medicine: A Case Based Review Margaret M. Johnson, MD Associate Professor, Division of Pulmonary Medicine Mayo Clinic Florida 33 year old non-smoking, previously healthy female No prior hospitalizations. RR 22 bpm hr 138 bpm BP 70 / 40 Coarse rhonchi bilaterally O2 saturation 82% - Up to 95% on face mask Mottled skin Anuric Lactate 6.
Recent Advances in Critical Care Medicine: A Case Based Review Margaret M. Johnson, MD Associate Professor, Division of Pulmonary Medicine Mayo Clinic Florida 33 year old non-smoking, previously healthy female No prior hospitalizations. RR 22 bpm hr 138 bpm BP 70 / 40 Coarse rhonchi bilaterally O2 saturation 82% - Up to 95% on face mask Mottled skin Anuric Lactate 6.
Recent Advances in Critical Care Medicine: A Case Based Review Margaret M. Johnson, MD Associate Professor, Division of Pulmonary Medicine Mayo Clinic Florida 33 year old non-smoking, previously healthy female No prior hospitalizations. RR 22 bpm hr 138 bpm BP 70 / 40 Coarse rhonchi bilaterally O2 saturation 82% - Up to 95% on face mask Mottled skin Anuric Lactate 6.
Margaret M. Johnson, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Chair, Division of Pulmonary Medicine Mayo Clinic Florida Johnson.margaret2@mayo.edu
33 year old non-smoking, previously healthy female
No prior hospitalizations T 38.9 (po) RR 22 bpm HR 138 bpm BP 70/40 Coarse rhonchi bilaterally O2 saturation 82% Up to 95% on face mask Mottled skin Anuric Lactate 6.2 Overview Updated Surviving Sepsis Guidelines Management of shock Fluid resuscitation Vasopressor support Role of steroids Respiratory management Intubation Ventilator management High frequency ventilation, prone ventilation Management strategies to decrease delirium Outcome
SURVIVING SEPSIS GUIDELINES: 2012
Joint collaboration between SSCM and European Respiratory Society
Third edition No industry funding used in revision process
Critical Care Medicine February 2013 www.survivingsepsis.org Sepsis: Fluid Resuscitation Crystalloid, normally saline, is primary choice Initial: 30 ml/kg = 2.1 L for 70 kg Subsequent boluses to defined endpoint Endpoints: Normal mixed venous oxygen saturation 65-70% Normal lactate Urine output > 0.5 ml/kg/hr MAP > 65 mm Hg Weak indication for albumin (Grade 2B) Avoid hetastarch with high molecular weight (> 200 kD) Potential Dangers of Saline Saline administration Hypertonic relative to blood Often causes hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis Does it cause renal injury ? Prospective, sequential, single institution pilot study Chloride restrictive v. chloride liberal Restrictive Lactated solution or plasma-lyte N = 776 (liberal) N = 773 (restrictive)
Norazim MY. JAMA 2012; 308(15):1566-1572 Results Limiting use of normal saline Less acute kidney injury and reduced need for dialysis in hospital No difference in length of stay or mortality No difference in need for dialysis after hospital discharge Current take home Uncertain Have a reason for giving saline Probably should consider alternative fluid if large volume required
Norazim MY. JAMA 2012; 308(15):1566-1572 Sepsis:Vasopressors Norepinephrine is first choice Grade 1B Epinephrine is an alternative Vasopressin can be added to norepinephrine Dopamine use limited by tachycardia NO INDICATION FOR RENAL DOSE DOPAMINE Dobutamine if cardiac dysfunction or persistent shock despite volume Value of Bedside ECHO Are Steroids Indicated ??? Sigh.Will we ever know Current recommendations Dont perform cosotropyn stimulation test to decide need for steroids Consider steroids with persistent shock despite fluids and vasopressors Hydrocortisone 200 mg/day Boluses or infusion Avoid dexamethasone Dont need fludrocortisone if hydrocortisone used Wean steroids when off vasopressors Six Hours Later BP 106/72 HR 90 RR 32 Received 4 L NSS Norepinephrine 12 ug/min
ABG: 7.32/42/310 on 100% O2 PaO2/fiO2 310 Intubation: Safety of Etomidate Meta-analysis: Etomidate associated with Increased risk of death 865 evaluated for mortality, RR 1.2 (1.02-1.42) Increased risk of adrenal insufficiency 1303 evaluated with cosotropyn stimulation test, RR 1.33 (1.22-1.46) Take home Causality not concluded, but.alternative should be considered, especially in sepsis Chan CM Crit Care Med 2012 40(11) 2945 Does She Have ARDS ? New Berlin Definition Maintains emphasis on PaO2/fiO2 ratio < 300 but > 200 = mild < 200 but > 100 = moderate < 100 = severe
Other components Acute ( < 7 days) Difficulty with chronic disease
Bilateral infiltrates Either computed tomography or chest x-ray
No need to exclude heart failure Heart failure cant solely explain respiratory failure JAMA 2012; 307 (23):2526 Value of New Berlin Definition Improved prognostic value: PaO2/fiO2 < 300 but > 200 = mild 27% mortality
PaO2/fiO2 < 200 but > 100 = moderate 32% mortality
PaO2/fiO2 < 100 = severe 45% mortality
Lower tidal volumes associated with decreased mortality
6 cc/kg IBW v. 12 cc/kg ARDSNet NEJM 2000 Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Absence of ARDS
Meta-analysis of patients WITHOUT ARDS Tidal volume 6.5 v. 10.6 cc/kg IBW Lower tidal volumes associated with: Lower chance of developing ARDS Decreased pulmonary infection or atelectasis Mortality Neto AS. JAMA 2012; 307 (23):2526 Is High Frequency Ventilation Helpful? OSCAR Trial 795 patients Multi-centered in UK Identical 30 day mortality (41%) Young D NEJM 2013;368:806 OSCILLATE Trial High frequency oscillator trial stopped prematurely due to increased mortality 47% v. 35% Ferguson N. NEJM 2013
Is Prone Positioning Beneficial ? Background Prone positioning has previously been shown to improve oxygenation but not mortality in ARDS 237 patients proned v. 229 control Severe ARDS PaO2: fiO2 < 150 Started early Within 36 hrs of ARDS 16 hrs/session 28 day mortality 16% (prone) v. 32.8% (control) (p< 0.001)
Guerin C. NEJM 2013;368:2159 Is Prone Positioning Beneficial ? Not blinded Control group-higher acuity scores Practical implementation Did not use specialty beds Proning was not associated with increased complications BUTthese were experienced centers
Guerin C. NEJM 2013;368:2159 9 Days Later Agitated and combative Receiving continuous infusions of lorazepam and fentanyl Agitation limits weaning attempts Is she delirious? Assessment of delirium Prevention and treatment
ICU Delirium Exact incidence is unknown but common Up to 85% in some series Negatively impacts both short and long term outcomes Short term Length of stay & duration of ventilation Mortality Long term Cognition Depression and post traumatic stress disorder Structural Changes Correlate with Delirium and Cognition Hopkins, RO Crit Care Med 2012
Greater Ventricle/Brain Ratio Correlates with Delirium Hopkins, RO Crit Care Med 2012 Recognition of Delirium Objective tools Confusion Assessment Method CAM-ICU Performed in conjunction with assessment of level of sedation (Richmond agitation and sedation score-RASS) www.icudelirium.org
May be hyperactive or hypoactive Ely EW. 2002 THINKRather than prescribe Toxic environments Shock, CHF Delirogenic Drugs Hypoxemia Consider Haloperidol Infection/Immobilization Nonpharmacologic interventions/Nutrition Eyeglasses, Hearing aides, re-orientation, sleep wake cycle restoration, sleep hygiene, noise control K+ electrolyte abnormalities Risk of Delirium Associated with Use of Lorazepam & Severity of Illness Pandhandipari P. Anestheshiology 2006 LORAZEPAM DOSE (MG) APACHE SCORE I N C I D E N C E
O F
D E L I R I U M
Less delirium with Dexmedetomidate v. Midazolam Rikker RR. JAMA 2009 N = 375 Similar time at goal sedation Sedation Comparison MENDS Trial (n = 106) Dexmetomonidine v. lorazepam in mechanically ventilated More days alive without delirium or coma with dexmetomidine Pandharipande JAMA 2007 Reade, et al ( n=20) Dexmetomidine v. haldoperidol intubated patients whose delirium prevented extubation Extubation sooner in dexmetomidine group Crit Care 2009
Sleep, Delirium, and Cognition Observational pre and post intervention study Daily checklist to improve sleep and maintain day-night cycles 634 (pre) v. 826 (post) patient days Subjective ratings of sleep not improved but less delirium and less noise post intervention
Kamdar BB. Crit Care Med 2013 Now What Discharged from the ICU on Day 17 Home on Day 23 What should she and her family expect? Denehy Curr Opin Crit Care Med 2013 Ways to Improve Functional Recovery In ICU Limit sedation use and development of delirium Utilize early mobility programs, physical, and occupational therapy Try to enhance sleep After ICU Coordinated post-discharge care including physical, occupational, and cognitive rehabilitation Inform patients and caregivers that functional limitations' commonly persist Take Home Points New sepsis guidelines Fluid 30 cc/kg normal saline No renal dose dopamine Avoid high molecular weight hetastarch Norepinephrine (+/- vasopressin) No role for cosotropyn stimulation test Use hydrocortisone as steroid for stress dose Chloride rich solutions associated with development of kidney injury
Take Home Points Caution with the use of etomidate -especially in sepsis Low tidal volume ventilation beneficial even in absence of ARDS High frequency ventilation has not shown mortality benefit Prone positioning associated with improved mortality Delirium is common and associated with worsened outcomes Objectively assess ? Avoid/Limit benzodiazepines Consider nonpharmacological therapies Long term impairments often follow critical illness Inform patients and caregivers Strategies to improve long term outcomes are ongoing