A Union attempt on the Confederate stronghold at Vicksburg, Mississippi seemed eminent as the events of the Civil War began to unravel. Because of its valuable strategic location, both to the Union and the Confederacy, it was only a matter of time before a fight for Vicksburg ensued. The inevitable Battle of Vicksburg occurred and the Union prevailed. Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant accepted the Confederate surrender on July, 4 th 1863. The siege of Vicksburg could not have been accomplished without the success of earlier Union efforts, namely the Union passing of the batteries along the citys Western bank on the Mississippi River. Maj. Gen. Grant believed that such an operation could not be undertaken until the waters receded. 1 He believed that if the United States Army planned on capturing the city, they would need the cooperation of the Navy because Vicksburgs western border is the Mississippi River. The Navy was so essential because it was the only means of protection for the Army if they hoped to pass the fourteen miles of batteries along the citys western border. 2
The Confederate President Jefferson Davis was aware of the citys strategic value and he was not entirely confident in the citys preparedness for defense in the event of an attack. In response to this concern, Davis decided to promote Major General John Clifford Pemberton to Lieutenant General. The
1 Grant, Ulysses S. "Memoirs of General Grant, Complete." www.gutenberg.org. David Widger. June 1, 2004. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4367/4367-h/4367-h.htm#ch30 (accessed May 5, 2013). 2 Grant, produced by Project Gutenberg, 2004. promotion was accompanied by his placement in command of the Department of Mississippi and East Louisiana. 3 In a telegram dated January 24 th , 1863, Confederate suspicions intensified regarding a Union assault on the city. Lt. Gen. Pemberton alerted General Joseph E. Johnston 4 that a Book captured from Yankee colonel killed yesterday says Vicksburg must be taken. 5
Maj. Gen. Grant and Rear Admiral David D. Porter, who took command of the Mississippi Squadron in October 1862, began to cooperate with each other and began the preparation for their hazardous passage of the enemys batteries. 6
Both men agreed that their plan could only be executed if the vessels were incognito. One of their major concerns was that the fires of the boilers might attract unwanted Confederate attention, so they tried to conceal the light from the fires by placing bales of hay and cotton next to the fires. 7 Also, to protect the ships from attack they decided to strategically place the boilers between guards to act as cover for the vessels. This plan was extremely dangerous and there was little guarantee that it could be executed without suffering damage that would doom the siege of
3 Davis, Jefferson. Jefferson Davis to Gov. John J. Pettus, September 30, 1862. ser. I, vol. 17, pt. II, In The War of Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, 716. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. 4 Pemberton, J. C. General J. C. Pemberton to General Joseph E. Johnston. ser. I, vol. 24, In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 710. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. 5 General J. C. Pemberton to General Joseph E. Johnston. In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 710. 6 Grant, produced by Project Gutenberg, 2004. 7 Ibid. Vicksburg. The Union General-in-Chief H. W. Halleck expressed his concerns regarding Grants plan to move below the city. He disapproved of Grants method to spread out his forces around the vicinity of Vicksburg. In a letter to Grant, Halleck explains: While working upon the canal, the division of your forces into several eccentric operations may have been very proper for the purpose of reconnoitering the country; but it is very important that, when you strike any blow, you should have your troops sufficiently concentrated to make the blow effective. The division of your army into small expeditions destroys your strength, and, when in the presence of an enemy, is very dangerous. 8
Halleck also says that the President has been growing very impatient with the progress in the west, and a successful strike must be completed before the Confederates are able to strengthen their position any more. 9
In a letter dated two days later on April 4 th , 1863, Grant responds to these doubts and explains his logic. Grant explains that surveillance has revealed the Confederates are planning an attack on Rosecrans, which will probably be rapidly followed by a move into West Tennessee. 10 Grant explains how he and Adm. Porter have collaborated and consented to spread out troops to defend against such an attempt by the Confederates. Grant also says that another reason for
8 Halleck, H. W., H. W. Halleck to Ulysses S. Grant, April 2 1863. ser. I, vol. 24, pt. I, In The War of Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, 25. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. 9 Ibid. 10 Grant, Ulysses S. Ulysses S. Grant to H. W. Halleck, April 4, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24, pt. I, In The War of Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, 25. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. spreading his troops is so that the Confederates are distracted to the west. 11
Furthermore, Grant explains that troops in the west will deter, if not, stop any shipment of supplies into Vicksburg. After other various justifications for his plan, Grant ends this letter by saying that This is the only move I now see as practical, and I hope it will meet your approval, and that he is satisfied the greatest confidence of success prevails. 12
On April 10 th , 1863, Adm. Porter issued orders to his command explaining how the passing was to be executed. 13 Porter instructed his command to pass with the utmost swiftness and stealth. 14 He ordered that every precaution should be made to protect the fleet against fire. Also, he told his men to make sure that no light was visible on the ships, and as they approach they must turn off their engines to minimize the noise. 15 Porter goes on to further order that the naval vessels will pass in the following order: the Benton, the Lafayette, the Price, the Louisville, the Mound City, and the Pittsburg, followed by the Carondelet. 16
Various transport vessels carrying coal, hay, grain, and other supplies (for the
11 Grant to Halleck, April 4, 1863, 25-26. 12 Ibid. 13 Porter, David D. David D. Porter to Commanders of Benton, Lafayette, Price, Louisville, Mound City, Pittsburg, Carondelet, and Tuscumbia, April 10, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 554-555..Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. 14 Ibid. 15 Ibid 16 Ibid. soldiers already below Vicksburg) would shortly follow the naval vessels past Vicksburg. On April 16 th , 1863 Adm. Porter began this dangerous journey past the batteries of Vicksburg aboard the Benton. 17 The Unions plan continued as planned by Adm. Porter only for a short time. The battery between Vicksburg and Warrenton was the first to open fire. Then the upper batteries began their bombardment of the Unions fleet, followed by attack from all of the other batteries along the line. 18
Although Porter was aboard the missions leading vessel the Benton, the ship was under the command of Lieutenant-Commander James A. Greer. Greer explains in a report that the mission commenced at 9:15 PM on the 16 th , and the upper batteries of the Confederates began to fire upon Union naval vessels with musketry at 11:10 PM. 19 Greer continues by explaining the events of the mission as he witnessed them unfold aboard the Benton. Greer recollects that At 11:16 the batteries opened upon us, firing slowly at first, but continuing to fire more rapidly as we passed by. At 11:23 we opened upon the batteries and town with the forward and port batteries. 20 Greer continues by explaining that his ship
17 Grant, produced by Project Gutenberg, 2004. 18 Grant, produced by Project Gutenberg, 2004. 19 Greer, James A. James A Greer to David D. Porter, April 17, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 555-556..Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. 20 Greer to Porter, April 17, 1863, 555-556. suffered minor damage, entirely on the port side of the vessel; and reports four casualties, only one of them fatal. 21
Porter's Fleet Running the Vicksburg batteries 22
The minimal damage incurred by the Benton was fairly consistent in degree with the damage sustained by the other participating Union naval vessels. Captain Henry A Walke, commander of the ironclad Lafayette, reported his gunboats journey south from the Yazoo Riverarriving safely under Vicksburg at Diamond Island Bend. 23 He shares that not a single life was lost onboard, and the Lafayette managed to avoid damage even after being under fire for one hour and twenty minutes. 24 The Pittsburg, the General Price, and the Louisville also managed to avoid casualties. 25 Although all the ships managed to suffer very
21 Greer to Porter, April 17, 1863, 556. 22 Photo from http://www.nps.gov/vick/historyculture/runbatteries.htm (accessed May 11th, 2-13). 23 Walke, Henry A. Henry A. Walke to David D. Porter, April 17, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 557..Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. 24 Walke to Porter, April 17, 1863. 25 Bertolette, J. C. J. C. Bertolette to David D. Porter, April 17, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 564-565. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. light, there were two transport ships that were disabled, the Henry Clay and the Forest Queen. 26
Because the Union was able to avoid too much damage, they were able to continue on to siege the Confederate held Vicksburg. Grant called the passing of Vicksburgs batteries one of the most important moments in the whole war. 27 The success of Grants efforts were even personally commended by Abraham Lincoln after the siege was completed. Lincoln stated, I feared it was a mistake. I now wish to make the personal acknowledgment that you were right, and I was wrong. 28 This is only one specific mission that helped determine the outcome of the Battle of Vicksburg.
Bibliography
26 Thomas, L. L. Thomas to E. M. Stanton, April 15, 1863 ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 565-566. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. 27 Grant, produced by Project Gutenberg, 2004. 28 Lincoln, Abraham. Abraham Lincoln to Ulysses S. Grant, July 13, 1863. Letter to General Ulysses S. Grant, ed. by Roy P. Basier. Abraham Lincoln Online, 2013. Bertolette, J. C. J. C. Bertolette to David D. Porter, April 17, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 564-565. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer- idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;idno=ofre0024;q1=555;view=image;seq=588; size=100;page=root (accessed April 9, 2013).
Davis, Jefferson. Jefferson Davis to Gov. John J. Pettus, September 30, 1862. ser. I, vol. 17, pt. II, In The War of Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, 716. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer- idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=jefferson%20davis;rgn=full%20text;idno= waro0025;didno=waro0025;view=image;seq=0720 (accessed April 21 st , 2013).
Grant, Ulysses S. "Memoirs of General Grant, Complete." www.gutenberg.org. David Widger. June 1, 2004. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4367/4367- h/4367-h.htm#ch30 (accessed May 5, 2013).
Grant, Ulysses S. Ulysses S. Grant to H. W. Halleck, April 4, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24, pt. I, In The War of Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, 25. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library.
Greer, James A. James A Greer to David D. Porter, April 17, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 555-556..Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer- idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=555;rgn=full%20text;idno=ofre0024;didno =ofre0024;view=image;seq=579;page=root;size=100 (accessed May 5, 2013).
Halleck, H. W., H. W. Halleck to Ulysses S. Grant, April 2 1863. ser. I, vol. 24, pt. I, In The War of Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, 25. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer- idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=25;rgn=full%20text;idno=waro0036;didno =waro0036;view=image;seq=0045 (accessed May 21 st , 2013).
Lincoln, Abraham. Abraham Lincoln to Ulysses S. Grant, July 13, 1863. Letter to General Ulysses S. Grant, ed. by Roy P. Basier. Abraham Lincoln Online, 2013. http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/grant.htm (accessed April 24, 2013).
Pemberton, J. C. General J. C. Pemberton to General Joseph E. Johnston. ser. I, vol. 24, In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 710. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer- idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=710;rgn=full%20text;idno=ofre0024;didno =ofre0024;view=image;seq=0744 (accessed May 14 th , 2013).
Photo from http://www.nps.gov/vick/historyculture/runbatteries.htm (accessed May 11th, 2-13).
Porter, David D. David D. Porter to Commanders of Benton, Lafayette, Price, Louisville, Mound City, Pittsburg, Carondelet, and Tuscumbia, April 10, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 554-555..Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer- idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=555;rgn=full%20text;idno=ofre0024;didno =ofre0024;view=image;seq=579;page=root;size=100 (accessed May 14 th , 2013).
Thomas, L. L. Thomas to E. M. Stanton, April 15, 1863 ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 565-566. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer- idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;idno=ofre0024;q1=555;view=image;seq=589; size=100;page=root (accessed on May 21, 2013).
Walke, Henry A. Henry A. Walke to David D. Porter, April 17, 1863. ser. I, vol. 24: Naval Forces on Western Waters (January 1, 1863- May 17, 1863), In Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, 557..Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer- idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=555;rgn=full%20text;idno=ofre0024;didno =ofre0024;view=image;seq=581;page=root;size=100 (accessed on May 8 th , 2013).