Este trabalho parte da premissa que a Economia coreana do sul depende no seu take-off em grande medida da operao das empresas privadas sob orientao governamental altamente centralizada, indo alm da mero estabelecimento das regras do jogo e da induo indireta por meio das foras de mercado, configurando uma forma de governo dos mercados. (HASAN, 1976:29 apud WADE, 1990, p. 24] Este fato criou as condies para o surgimento de vrias teorias explicativas do seu sucesso, a exemplo das baseadas no i) livre Mercado ( THE FREE MARKET (FM) THEORY) b) na induo do mercados (THE STIMULATED FREE MARKET) e c) no governo dos mercados ( THE GOVERNED MARKET (GM) THEORY OF EAST ASIAN SUCCESS).
O objetivo deste trabalho mostrar que as distintas teorias se complementam, j que cada uma delas foca um aspecto especifico da arquitetura e da operao do sistema de planejamento da Coria do Sul no perodo em tela.
Com este propsito o trabalho consta desta introduo mais duas partes e uma concluso, em todas trato das teorias explicativas para o sucesso da experincia da Coreia do Sul do planejamento do desenvolvimento. . Na primeira parte trato da Teoria do livre mercado, na segundo me debruo sobre a Teoria do livre mercado induzido e no terceiro introduzo a Teoria do Mercado Governando.
1 A Teoria do Livre Mercado
"An abundant literature attributes the industrial success of the five NIcs- Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore-to their reliance on free markets [...]"Malaysia, Singapore, Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Ja-pan-relying extensively on private markets-are thriving. .By contrast, India, Indonesia, and Communist China, all relying heavily on central plan-ning, have experienced economic stagnation" (Milton and Rose Friedman, in Free to Choose, 1980: 57) [WADE, 1990, p. 22].
2. A Teoria do Mercado Estimulado "Some neoclassical economists conclude that the governments of East Asia did more than just liberalize markets and lower distortions. In their view the gov-ernments also intervened more positively to offset other distortions, both those caused by other policies (e.g., import controls) and those remaining from gov-ernment failure to change distortion- inducing institutions directly (e.g., seg-mented financial markets). [WADE, 1990, 23]
"[] the proponents of the SM view have shown little interest in ana- lyzing the nature of government intervention in East Asia, though they rec-ognize its existence. And they also place primary causal weight on the char-acter of the trade regime for explaining economic perfonnance. For both reasons, the SM theory can be considered a variant of the core neoclassical theory, which links economic success to self-adjusting markets. " [WADE, 1990, 24]
3. A Teoria do Mercado Governado The governed market (GM) theory says that the superiority of East Asian economic performance is due in large measure to a combination of: (1) very high levels of productive investment, making for fast transfer of newer techniques into actual production; (2) more investment in certain key industries than would have occurred in the absence of government intervention; and (3) exposure of many industries to international competition, in foreign markets if not at home. These are the proximate causes. At a second level of causation, they are themselves the result, in important degree, of a set of government economic policies. Using incentives, controls, and mechanisms to spread risk, these policies enabled the government to guide~r govern-market processes of resource allocation so as to produce different production and investment outcomes than would have occurred with either free market or simulated free market policies. At the third level of explanation, the policies have been per-mitted or supported by a certain kind of organization of the state and the pri-vate sector. Let us specify the policies and the organizational arrangements in more detail. [WADE, 1990, pp. 26/27]
REFERNCIAS
HASAN, Parvez., 1976, Korea, Problems and 1ssues in a Rapidly Growing Economy. Balti-more: Johns Hopkins University Press.
MASON, Eward., et al., The Economic and Social Modernization of the Republic of Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1980
POWELL, Benjamin, State Development Planning: Did it Create an East Asian Miracle? Independent Institute Working Paper Number 2004/54
WADE, R. (1990) Governing the Market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [ the most completely developed theory of the East Asian developmental state. ]