Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
+
=
Qet
1
B I== 1 A
1
&
+
=
... ! #. - & ... ! 1. - & ... ! 6. - . -
#
=
# & & 6 . -
#
=
. # & 6 &
#
= +
Osing the 4uadratic formula
a&
#
G b& G c H .
a #
ac 1 b b
&
#
=
#
1# . 1 6
#
17 6
#
; #6 6
&
#
=
=
=
b. ?ecause the undiscounted (P) of the project is positive Ai.e.I -F#.!... G -6.!... F
-1.!... H -#.!...B the project will have a positive (P) at all discount rates between F
7;..7< and G1#7.#7<. Therefore the firm can accept the project as long as its cost of
capital falls between the two I==s.
c. To determine the 9I==! solve for the interest rate that e4uates the present value of the
outflows to the future value of the inflows! with the discount rate and compounding rate
e4ual to the firm+s cost of capital.
I== 1
1
6: . 1
+
=
1 I== 6: . 1 6: . 1 = +
6: . ' I== 6: . 1 =
=
=
6: . 1
6: . '
I==
1
F7;..7<
I== 1
1
11 . .
+
=
1 I== ..11 ..11 = +
..6: I== ..11 =
= =
..11
..6:
I==
#
< #7 . 1#7
"#$ Chapter 7
Eear /% %) L 16< P) L 16<
. -#.... A-#.!......B
1 6.... -67!6.....
# -1.... A-7!6:1.11B
-67!6..... A-#7!6:1.11B
-#7!6:1.11 H -67!6.. P RA1GiB
#
S
9I== H I H 11.11<
The project is acceptable according to the 9I==.
7-17. a.
... ! 1;. -
B 1 A
... ! 1#. -
B 1 A
... ! 6:. ! 1 -
. -
# 1
+
+
=
%&& %&&
Qet
1
B I== 1 A
1
&
+
=
... ! 1;. - ... ! 1#. - ... ! 6:. ! 1 - . -
#
= ! !
Osing the 4uadratic formula
a&
#
G b& G c H .
a #
ac 1 b b
&
#
=
... ! #1. -
'1; ! 1;1 ! 1 - ... ! 6:. ! 1 -
#
= !
b.
Interest
=ate (P)
. -@:.!......
6. -''7!777.7;
1.. -1'6!......
16. -1@!@#....
#.. -;!;;;.;@
#6. A-1#!6@1.76B
%&& +
=
1
1
:; . 1#
1 :; . 1# :; . 1# = + %&&
< 11 . @#
1
= %&&
I== 1
1
'16' . .
+
=
1 I== '16' . . '16' . . = +
< 1: . 17 # I==
#
=
Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques "#3
(P) Profile
A-#..!......B
-....
-#..!......
-1..!......
-:..!......
-;..!......
-1!...!......
-1!#..!......
. 6. 1.. 16. #.. #6. '..
Interest =ate
(
P
)
c. Ees! because at #6< the (P) is positive.
d. To determine the 9I==! solve for the interest rate that e4uates the present value of the
outflows to the future value of the inflows! with the discount rate and compounding rate
e4ual to the firm+s cost of capital.
Eear /% %) L 16< P) L 16<
. -1;.!... A-1;.!...B
1
1!6:.!..
. -1!7@1!...
# -1#.!... A-@.!7'7B
77< -1!7@1!... A-67.!7'7B
-67.!7'7 H -1!7@1!... P RA1GiB
#
S
9I== H I H 77.#@<
The project is acceptable according to the 9I==.
7-1;.
a. /ost of /apital Project (P)
. -.
6 -F1.'6
1. .
16 -..6:
#. .
#6 -F..:7#
'. .
'6 -'.1:
6. -11.1;
b.
"#4 Chapter 7
(P) Profile
-1.
.
1.
#.
'.
1.
6.
. #. 1. :.
/ost of /apital
(
P
)
c. The project has an I== at every point where it crosses the discount rate a&is! in this case
at .<! 1.<! #.< and '.<. The four I==s correspond to the four changes in sign of the
project+s cash flows.
d. This project is acceptable at discount rates between 1.< and #.< and when the
discount rate is greater than '.< in those cases the (P) is positive.
7-1@. The PIs at the end of each project are listed belowD
a. PI of Qi4uidate H -1';!1:1 > -1..!... H 1.';
PI of =econdition H -1.#!6:1 > -6..!... H ..;1
PI of =eplace H -1!111!:1' > -1!...!... H 1.11
b. 7ccept both Qi4uidate and =eplace because both have a PI , 1..
c. 7ccept Qi4uidate because it has the highest PI.
d. 7ccording to the (P)! the ranking would be =eplace! Qi4uidate and then =econdition.
If the projects are independent! =eplace and Qi4uidate are acceptable! while
=econdition is not viable. If the projects are mutually e&clusive! =eplace should be
chosen.
Qi4uidate =econdition =eplace
Eear /ash %low
$iscounted
L 16< /ash %low
$iscounted
L 16< /ash %low
$iscounted
L 16<
. -A1..!...B -A1..!...B -A6..!...B -A6..!...B -A1!...!...B -A1!...!...B
1 -6.!... -1'!17; -1..!... -;:!@67 -6..!... -1'1!7;'
# -:.!... -16!':@ -#..!... -161!##@ -6..!... -'7;!.7#
' -76!... -1@!'11 -#6.!... -1:1!'7@ -6..!... -'#;!76;
(P) -';!1:1 -A@7!1':B -111!:1'
e. Chen the projects are mutually e&clusive! the PI method and (P) method result in a
dilemma! as PI argues for Qi4uidate while (P) argues for =eplace. The reason for this
dilemma is due to the large scale differences in the projects.
Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques "#5
7-#.. a. (P)1 H F-1!...!... G -1!...!... ! A1.1#B
-1
G -#!...!... ! A1.1#B
-#
G -'!...!... !
A1.1#B
-'
H -:##!6;:
(P)# H F-6!...!... G -#!...!... ! A1.1#B
-1
G -'!...!... ! A1.1#B
-#
G -'!...!... !
A1.1#B
-'
H -1!'1#!:'7
(P)' H F-1.!...!... G -1!...!... ! A1.1#B
-1
G -:!...!... ! A1.1#B
-#
G -6!...!... !
A1.1#B
-'
H -1!@1'!1@' Rhighest (P)S
b. PI1 H -1!:##!6;: > -1!...!... H 1.1:
PI# H -:!'1#!:'7 > -6!...!... H 1.#: Rhighest PIS
PI' H -11!@1'!1@' > -1.!...!... H 1.1@
c. 7lthough Project U # provides Vmore bang for the buckW as represented by its higher PI!
Project U' should be accepted since it has the higher (P) and there are no other
investments under consideration. It adds most to the firm.
7-#1. The (P) of Project 7?/ is -;1;.1;D A--1!...... G R-#!...... P A1 G 1.<BS H -;1;.1;. The
(P) of Project X=3 is -#!......D A--1.!...... G R-1!1..... P A1 G 1.<BS G R-1!;1.... P A1 G
1.<B
#
S G R-6!'#1... P A1 G 1.<B
'
S H -#!......B.
The profitability inde& of Project 7?/ is 1.;1;D A 1 G R(P) P /ostS H 1 G R-;1;.1; P
-1!......S H 1.;1;B. The profitability inde& of Project X=3 is 1.#.D A1 G R-#!...... P
-1.!......S H 1.#.B.
?ased on (P)! Project X=3 is considered better. ?ased on profitability inde&! Project 7?/ is
better.
7-##. a. The discounted payback period for Project Y is ' years A': monthsBD A--'!'..... G
R-1!#'#... P A1 G 1#<BS G R-1.'7@.;1 P A1 G 1#<B
#
S G R-1!616.1# P A1 G 1#<B
'
S H
-....B. The discounted payback period for Project E is 1 years A1; monthsBD A-
-6!...... G R-1!11#.6. P A1 G 1'<BS G R-1!6@:.1' P A1 G 1'<B
#
S G R-1!;.'.:# P A1 G
1'<B
'
S G R-#!.';..@ P A1 G 1'<B
1
S H -....B.
b. Jiven the threshold of 1# months! Project Y is the better project.
c. The (P) of Project Y is -1!1.....D A--'!'..... G R-1!#'#... P A1 G 1#<BS G
R-1.'7@.;1 P A1 G 1#<B
#
S G R-1!616.1# P A1 G 1#<B
'
S G R-1!7'..;7 P A1 G 1#<B
1
S H
-1!1.....B. The (P) of Project E is -1!#6....D A--6!...... G R-1!11#.6. P A1 G 1'<BS
G R-1!6@:.1' P A1 G 1'<B
#
S G R-1!;.'.:# P A1 G 1'<B
'
S G R-#!.';..@ P A1 G 1'<B
1
S G
R-#!'.'..1 P A1 G 1'<B
6
SH -1!#6....B. Osing the (P) criteria! Project E is better.
d. The profitability inde& of Project Y is 1.'''D A 1 G R(P) P /ostS H 1 G R-1!1..... P
-'!'.....S H 1.'''B. The profitability inde& of Project E is 1.#6.D A 1 G R-1!#6.... P
-6!......S H 1.#6.B. ?ased on the profitability inde&! Project Y is better.
7-#'. Project /ash %lows Ain millionsBD
%low /ash
Eear
6 . 1 -
.
. . # -
1
. . # -
#
. . # -
'
a. 7t "ld Qines discount rate of 1.<! this project has an (P) of about -171!... and an
"#6 Chapter 7
I== of 16.@<. This project would be acceptable for "ld Qine.
c. 7t 2igh Techs #.< discount rate! the project (P) is about F-#;7!.... This makes the
project unacceptable to 2igh Tech due to its negative (P).
c. The cost of capital is very important to the acceptance of a project. 7 firm that has a
lower cost of capital will find more projects acceptable and! all other things e4ual! will
potentially add more value for shareholders.
7-#1.
/ash%low
Eear
... ! #. -
.
1.. ! 1 -
1
1.. ! 1 -
#
1.. ! 1 -
'
1.. ! 1 -
1
1.. ! 1 -
6
1.. ! 1 -
:
1.. ! 1 -
7
a. 7t 1.<! the (P) of the project is -1!1#1..1.
b. The I== is 1#.1'<
c. This project is acceptable by both (P) and I== criteria. It has a positive (P) and its
I== is greater than its hurdle rate of 1.<.
7-#6. a. The payback period is '.6: years.
End of Year CF Cum CF
years 6: . ' 6: . '
6.. ! '1 -
6.. ! :7 - ... ! ;6 -
yrs '
= +
=
+
1 -1;!... -1;!...
# ##!6.. 16!...
' #7!... :7!6..
1 '1!6.. @@!...
6 ':!... 1'6!...
b. (P) is -;!:7#.61
c. I== is 16.:<.
d. This project is acceptable by both (P) and I== criteria. It has a positive (P) and its
I== of 16.:< is greater than its hurdle rate of 1#<.
7-#:.
Project
a.
Payback
b.
(P)
c.
I==
Y
#.@:
years
-11!@:6.#
1
#..1<
E
'.17
years
-11!#.:.1
;
17.1<
T
'.'7
years
-:!#1..@1
11.76
<
Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques "#7
d. =anking on PaybackD Y!E!T
=anking on (P)D Y!E!T
=anking on I==D Y!E!T
7ll measures agree that Y is best! followed by E! and then and T. 3ince they are
mutually e&clusive projects! accept the project with the highest (P)! which is Project
Y.
7-#7.
Eea
r
7ll at once Jradual
.
F
-6!...!..
.
F
-1!...!...
1
F
-#!...!...
#
F
-#!...!...
'
F
-#!...!...
The (P) of the immediate program is F-6 million. The (P) of the phase-in program! at a
discount rate of 16<! is F-6.67 million. It is cheaper to implement the immediate pollution
control program.
7-#;. All measures indicate project acceptability.
NPV > 0
IRR >11%
PI > 1.00
The indicates the pre!erred project usin" each measure.
a. NPV
#$
% &'()*1*.'( NPV
+T
% &1,-)-.,.0(
b. IRR
#$
% 1/.0(% IRR
+T
% 1..1(%
c. PI
#$
% 1.1* PI
+T
% 1.1.
7sset 7 7sset ?
-#..!... -1;.!...
Eear /%
$iscounted
/% /%
$iscounted
/%
1 -7.!... -:#!6.. -;.!... -:#!6..
# -;.!... -:'!77: -@.!... -:'!77:
' -@.!... -:1!.:. -'.!... -:1!.:.
1 -@.!... -67!1@7 -1.!... -67!1@7
6 -1..!... -6:!71' -1.!... -6:!71'
"# Chapter 7
d. Timing issues result between the two projects because Project 3X receives a substantial
amount of inflows early in its life while the bulk of Project 2T+s cash flows do not
arrive until later in its life. The reinvestment rate assumption of the I== method leads
to a conflict between project choices for the I== method vs the (P) method. 7
scaling problem also e&ists in that 3X costs about 1.6 times that of 2T.
(P) Profile
-A1!...!...B
-A6..!...B
--
-6..!...
-1!...!...
.< #.< 1.< :.<
Interest =ate
(
P
)
3X
2T
e. The firm should choose Project 2T. %irst! according to the (P) Profile! at the 11<
discount rate! 2T has the higher (P). 3econdly! according to the 9I== calculation!
Project 2T has the higher 9I== A9I==3X H 1'.#@<! 9I==2T H 1'.:1<B.
7-#@. a. (P) of =epackage is -..';1 million. (P) of =eformulate is -..1.7. /hoose the
higher (P)! =epackage.
b. I== of =epackage is #1..1<. I== of =eformulate is 1'.#.<. /hoose the higher I==!
=epackage.
c. PI of =epackage is P) of inflows divided by P) of outflowsD -'!';1!'@.>-'!...!... H
1.1'. PI of =eformulate is -#6!1.#!1:'>-#6!...!... H 1...1. /hoose the higher PI!
=epackage.
d. 7t an interest rate of appro&imately 1#< =eformulate becomes less desirable than
=epackage. 7lso! it is clear from the Profile that =eformulate is far more sensitive to
the discount rate than =epackage. 7 timing problem e&ists in the sense that
=eformulate receives the bulk of its inflows early on. 7nd! a scaling problem e&ists in
that =epackage costs more than eight times =eformulate.
Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques "#9
(P) Profile
-A16!...!...B
-A1.!...!...B
-A6!...!...B
--
-6!...!...
-1.!...!...
.< 1.< #.< '.< 1.< 6.<
Interest =ate
(
P
)
=epackage
=eformulate
e. (o! the rankings do not yield mi&ed signals. =epackage is better under all criteria.
f. The I== of the incremental projectD
Eear =epackage =eformulate
=epackage -
=eformulate
.
F
-'!...!...
F
-#6!...!...
-##!...!...
1 #!...!... 1.!...!... F;!...!...
# 1!#6.!... @!...!... F7!76.!...
' 6..!... 7!...!... F:!6..!...
1 #6.!... 1!...!... F'!76.!...
6 #6.!... '.6..!... F'!#6.!...
The I== of the incremental project is its compound annual costs of 1#.';<. %or a
project of this type resulting from the smaller si*e of repackage versus reformulate! if
the I== is less than the discount rate! it is acceptable. =epackage is therefore the better
project because its incremental cost is less than the cost of capital.
7-'.. a.! b.! c.
Eear 7 ? 7-?
. F-#.6 F-#.6 .
1 1.: .'6 1.#6
# 1.: .'6 1.#6
' .'6 F.'6
.
.
.
.
""# Chapter 7
6. .'6 F.'6
Project (P) I== PI
7
-#7:!;:
.
1;.1:< -#7:!;:.>-#!6..!... H 1.11
?
-@7.!1;
6
1'.@;<
-'!17.!1;6>-#!6..!... H
1.'@
=ankingsD ?! 7 7! ? ?! 7
The PI rankings agree with the rankings on (P).
d. I== and (P) yield mi&ed signals because of differences in the si*e and magnitude of
their cash flows. Project 7 returns cash sooner than ?! a pattern that generally has a
higher I== than one! like ?! that returns cash flows over a longer period of time.
e. Qundblad should choose project 7. The (P) of the incremental project is F-:@'!'#:!
and its I== is 1'.1<. Chen a project has nonconventional cash flows AG inflows
followed by -outflowsB its I== is its compound annual costs. If this cost is greater than
the hurdle rate! the project is unacceptable. In this case the cost of 1'.1< is greater than
the 1.< cost of capital and therefore! Project 7 is inferior to Project ?.
f. If the cost of capital is 1'.6<! Project 7 has an (P) of -161!711 and an I== of
1;.1:<. 7t a cost of capital of 1:<! 7 has an (P) of -:;!'71. 7t a cost of capital of
1'.6<! Project ? has an (P) of -;7!@;. and at 1:<! F-'1'!;.@. Project 7 is better
than Project ? at a discount rate of 1'.6<. 7t 1:<! Project 7 is the only acceptable
project. 7t a cost of capital of #.<! Project 7+s (P) is F-66!66: and Project ?+s
(P) is F-76.!1@#I both projects should be rejected at this cost of capital.
7-'1. Thomson "ne ?usiness 3chool 8dition
7-'#. Thomson "ne ?usiness 3chool 8dition
Answers to mini'case
Payback period:
Poofy PuffsD
Initial outlayD -#1!;@.!...
7mount recovered in year 1D -1#!@6.!...
7mount remaining that needs to be recoveredD -#1!;@.!... - -1#!@6.!... H 11!@1.!...
7mount recovered in year #D -1.!@#'!...
7mount remaining after year # that needs to be recoveredD -11!@1.!... - -1.!@#'!... H -1!.17!...
9ore than this amount is recovered in year '! so we must calculate the fraction of year ' it takes to
recover the remaining -1!.17!.... It takes ..1#': A-1!.17!... P -;!#'1!...B of a year to recover the
remainder! or 1.6 months. Thus! the total payback for Poofy Puffs is # years and 1.6 months.
%illing %iberD
Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques """
Initial outlayD -1'!6..!...
7mount recovered in year 1D -7!#'.!...
7mount remaining that needs to be recovered after year 1D -1'!6..!... - -7!#'.!... H :!#7.!...
9ore than this amount is recovered in year #! so we must calculate the fraction of year # it takes to
recover the remaining -:!#7.!.... It takes ..77 A:!#7.!... P ;!1..!...B of a year to recover the
remainder! or @.#@ months. Thus! the total payback for %illing %iber is 1 year and @.#1 months.
iscounted Payback Period
$iscounted
Eear Poofy Puffs %illing %iber Poofy Puffs %illing %iber
. -A#1!;@.!...B -A1'!6..!...B
-A#1!;@.!...B -A1'!6..!...B
1 -1#!@6.!... -7!#'.!...
-11!77#!7#7 -:!67#!7#7
# -1.!@#'!... -;!1..!...
-@!.#7!#7' -:!:@1!#16
' -;!#'1!... -;!:#@!...
-:!1;1!.7# -:!1;'!.@6
1 -7!#1#!... -6!#';!@..
-1!@1:!';' -'!67;!#'@
Poofy PuffsD
Initial outlayD -#1!;@.!...
7mount recovered in year 1 in discounted dollarsD -11!77#!7#7
7mount remaining after year 1 that needs to be recoveredD -#1!;@.!... - -11!77#!7#7 H -1'!117!#7'
7mount recovered in year # in discounted dollarsD -@!.#7!#7'
7mount remaining after year # that needs to be recoveredD -1'!117!#7' - -@!.#7!#7' H -1!.@.!...
9ore than this amount is recovered in year '! so we must calculate the fraction of year ' it takes to
recover the remaining -1!.@.!.... It takes ..:: A1!.@.!... P :!1;1!.7#B of a year to recover the
remainder! or 7.@1 months. Thus! the total discounted payback for Poofy Puffs is # years and ; months.
%illing %iberD
Initial outlayD -1'!6..!...
7mount recovered in year 1 in discounted dollarsD -:!67#!7#7
7mount remaining that needs to be recoveredD -1'!6..!... - -:!67#!7#7 H -:!@#7!#7'
7mount recovered in year # in discounted dollarsD -:!:@1!#16
7mount remaining after year # that needs to be recoveredD -:!@#7!#7' - -:!:@1!#16 H -#''!.6;
9ore than this amount is recovered in year '! so we must calculate the fraction of year ' it takes to
recover the remaining -#''!.6;. It takes ...1 A-#''!.6; P :!1;'!.@6B of a year to recover the
remainder! or .1 months. Thus! the total discounted payback for %illing %iber is # years and ..1 months.
!ccounting "ate of "eturn:
Poofy PuffsD
The average book value of Poofy Puffs is -#1!;@.!... P #! or -1#!116!.... The average net income for
the project A-:!7#7!6.. G -1!7..!6.. G -#!..;!6.. G -7!#1#!...B P 1 H -6!1:@!:#6. (e&t! divide the
average net income by the average book value of the project! or A-6!1:@!:#6 P -1#!116!...B H ..1161 or
11.61<.
%illing %iberD
""$ Chapter 7
The average book value is -1'!6..!... P # H -:!76.!... while the average net income is -'!@#1!176! or
A-'!;66!... G -1!7#6!... G -6!#61!... G -1!;:'!@..B P 1 H -'!@#1!176. The project+s accounting rate
of return is 6;.11<! or -'!@#1!176 P -:!76.!....
#et Present $alue:
$iscounted
Eear Poofy Puffs %illing %iber Poofy Puffs %illing %iber
. -#1!;@.!... -1'!6..!...
1 1#!@6.!... 7!#'.!... -11!77#!7#7 -:!67#!7#7
# 1.!@#'!... ;!1..!... -@!.#7!#7' -:!:@1!#16
' ;!#'1!... ;!:#@!... -:!1;1!.7# -:!1;'!.@6
1 7!#1#!... 6!#';!@.. -1!@1:!';' -'!67;!#'@
%um & '()*+(,*-./ '0(*(01*077
Poofy PuffsD (P) H P)inflows F P)outflows H -'1!@'.!16: F -#1!;@.!... H -7!.1.!16:.
%illing %iberD (P) H -#'!'#;!#77 F -1'!6..!... H -@!;#;!#77.
2nternal "ate of "eturn:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) r r r r + + + +
+ + + + =
1 1 1 1
1 ' # 1
... ! #1# ! 7 -
... ! #'1 ! ; -
... ! @#' ! 1. -
... ! @6. ! 1# -
. -#1!;@.!.. - -. D Puffs Poofy
r H #1..@<
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) r r r r + + + +
+ + + + =
1 1 1 1
1 ' # 1
@.. ! #'; ! 6 -
... ! :#@ ! ; -
... ! 1.. ! ; -
... ! #'. ! 7 -
. -1'!6..!.. - -. D %iber %illing
r H 11.61<
Profitability Inde&D
PI H P)inflows P P)outflows
PIPoofy Puffs H -'1!@'.!16: P -#1!;@.!... H 1.#;
PI%illing %iber H -#'!'#;!#77 P -1'!6..!... H 1.7'
7nalysisD The minimum re4uired payback period is 1.76 years! therefore both projects would be
rejected using the payback and discounted payback period. %rom an accounting rate of return A77=B
perspective! both projects would be acceptable as they have 7==s above the re4uired 16<. ?ased on
the (P) method! both projects would be acceptable as the net present values are positive. ?oth projects
are acceptable using the I== method as well! as the I==s are greater than 1.<. 7lso! the profitability
inde& APIB is greater than 1.. for both projects! thus both are acceptable using that criterion. "f course!
since both of these projects are independent and Znormal!+ one would not e&pect the (P)! I== or PI
methods to conflict.
Technically! there is not a scaling issue with these two projects as the (P) method and the I== method
rank %illing %iber as the better project. 3ince the projects are independent! the firm should proceed with
both of them.
Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques ""3