Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SOIL INVESTIGATION
For
(MilQasim-1 Drillsite)
(Western ZAGROS)
April 2011
CONTENTS
1- INTRODUCTION 1.1 Authorization and Scope 1.2 Site location 1.3 Report Layout 2 SEISMICITY OF THE AREA 3 FIELD WORKS 3.1 Boring 3.2 Recovery of Samples 3.3 In-situ Test 4- LABORATORY TESTING 5- SUB-SOIL CONDITION 5.1 Sub-soil profile 5.2 Groundwater Level 6- EVALUATION AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 6.1 Atterberg Limits 6.2 Unconfined Compression Test Results 6.3 Consolidation Properties 6.4 Texture of Soil 6.5 Chemical Properties 7 STRUCTURAL DESIGN INFORMATION 8 - RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Type of footings 8.2 Depth of Footing 8.3 Allowable bearing Capacity 8.4 Groundwater 8.5 Expansive soil 8.6 Type of Cement 9.0 MODULUS OF SUB-GRADE REACTION;
2 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11
Site of project
0 I II II
3. FIELD WORK
3.1 Boring
Two boreholes were drilled to a depth of 20.0 m from the present ground level. Figure (2) shows a sketch showing locations of the bore-holes. The boreholes were advanced by using power drilling machine. The applied method for drilling was continuous flight auger method (Photo No. 1).
BH 2 North
7.0 m
Well
7.0 m
BH 1 South
Fig (2) Sketch of the Site showing the location of the well and boreholes
Photo (1) power drilling machine using continuous flight auger method for drilling.
4-LABORATORY TESTING
4.1 Type of Tests 4.1.1 Tests on undisturbed & disturbed soil samples
i) ii) iii) Liquid & Plastic Limits. Sieve analysis. Chemical Tests.
5- SUB-SOIL CONDITION:
5.1- Sub-soil Profile:
The sub-soil stratification is shown in the boreloge sheets, from which the sub-soil condition can be summarized as follows: (a) A layer of a backfill soil was found from the ground surface and covering the site. Thickness of this layer is about 1.0 m. (b) The upper layer is underlained by a cohesive layer of a hard light brown to green Clay. This layer is continued to the end of boring.
BH 1
BH 2
From this table it can be obtained that the cohesive soil can be classified as a medium to high expansive soil.
Jwet
Jdry
BH 2
pressure(Pc) (kN/m )
2
BH 1 BH 2
5.50-6.0 4.0-4.50
121 81
280 260
0.5262 0.6498
0.0982 0.1219
0.0210 0.0260
10
BH 2
1.50 5.0
7.8 7.9
0.35 0.28
8. RECOMMENDATIONS
8.1 Type of footings
According to the proposed structure type, which is the Concrete base slab, and depending on the loading condition and recommended value of the allowable bearing capacity, suitable types of foundations of rigid raft or mat foundation can be used.
8.4 Groundwater
No groundwater was encountered up to end of boring, so no construction problem due to groundwater is anticipated.
11
12
References
1. American Society for Testing and Material Annual Book of ASTM Standard 2. Bowels, E. Joseph (1995) Foundation Analysis and Design Mc Graw-Hill Companies 3. British Standards Code of Practice (BS) 4. Craig, R. F. (1997) Soil Mechanics E & FN Spon , London. 5. Das, B. M. (1983) Advanced Soil Mechanics Mc Graw-Hill Book Companies. 6. Das, B. M. (1990) Principles of Geotechnical Engineering Pws-kent Publishing Company Boston. 7. Das, B. M. (1999) Principle of Foundation Engineering Pws-kent Publishing Company Boston. 8. Day, R. W. (2001) Soil Testing Manual Mc Graw- Hill Inc. 9. Head, K. H. (1981) Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing Vol. 1, Vol. 2 & Vol. 3 , Pentch press , London 10. Mc Carthy, D. F. (1998) Essentials of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Prentice Hall company. 11. Uni Budhui (2000) Soil Mechanics & Foundation John Wiley & Sons, Inc , Newyork. 12. Tomlinson, M. J. (1996) Foundation Design & Construction Longman Company.