0 Voti positivi0 Voti negativi

74 visualizzazioni8 pagineParts Per Million converstion

Apr 22, 2014

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

Parts Per Million converstion

© All Rights Reserved

74 visualizzazioni

Parts Per Million converstion

© All Rights Reserved

- Periodic Tales: A Cultural History of the Elements, from Arsenic to Zinc
- The Application of Green Solvents in Separation Processes
- Proof: The Science of Booze
- The Science of Positivity: Stop Negative Thought Patterns by Changing Your Brain Chemistry
- Biochemistry For Dummies
- Organic Chemistry: Structure, Mechanism, and Synthesis
- Construction Calculations Manual
- Chemistry Essentials For Dummies
- Quantum Physics: What Everyone Needs to Know
- Organic Chemistry: Made Simple
- Night Fire: Big Oil, Poison Air, and Margie Richard's Fight to Save Her Town
- Organic Chemistry II For Dummies
- Thermodynamics For Dummies
- Process Plant Design: Heinemann Chemical Engineering Series
- Chemistry For Dummies
- Pharmacology: Principles and Practice
- Chemical Process Equipment - Selection and Design (Revised 2nd Edition)
- The Science of Everyday Life: Why Teapots Dribble, Toast Burns and Light Bulbs Shine
- Piping Materials Guide
- Fentanyl, Inc.: How Rogue Chemists Are Creating the Deadliest Wave of the Opioid Epidemic

Sei sulla pagina 1di 8

Page 1 of 8

Parts-per notation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(RedirectedfromParts per million) Parts-per notation is used, especially in science and engineering, to denote relative proportions in measured quantities; particularly in low-value (high-ratio) proportions at the parts-per-million (ppm) 106, parts-per-billion (ppb) 109, and parts-per-trillion (ppt) 1012 level. Since parts-per notations are quantity-perquantity measures, they are known as dimensionless quantities; that is, they are pure numbers with no associated units of measurement. In regular prose, parts-per notations generally take the literal parts per meaning of a comparative ratio. However, in mathematical expressions, parts-per notations function as coefficients with values less than1.

One part per trillion (1 ppt) is a proportion equivalent to one-twentieth of a drop of water diluted into an Olympic-size swimming pool.

Contents

1 Overview 2 Parts-per expressions 3 Alternatives to parts-per notation 3.1 SI-compliant expressions 3.2 Uno 4 Improper applications of parts-per notation 5 Convertibility to other units of measurement 5.1 Air measurements 6 See also 7 References 8 External links

Overview

Parts-per notation is often used in the measure of dilutions (concentrations) in chemistry; for instance, for measuring the relative abundance of dissolved minerals or pollutants in water. The expression 1ppm means a given property exists at a relative proportion of one part per million parts examined, as would occur if a water-borne pollutant was present at a concentration of onemillionth of a gram per gram of sample solution. Similarly, parts-per notation is used also in physics and engineering to express the value of various proportional phenomena. For instance, a special metal alloy might expand 1.2 micrometers per meter

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_per_million

23-07-2010

Page 2 of 8

of length for every degree Celsius and this would be expressed as =1.2ppm/C. Parts-per notation is also employed to denote the change, stability, or uncertainty in measurements. For instance, the accuracy of land-survey distance measurements when using a laser rangefinder might be 1 millimeter per kilometer of distance; this could be expressed as Accuracy=1ppm.[1] Parts-per notations are all dimensionless quantities: in mathematical expressions, the units of measurement always cancel. In fractions like 2 nanometers per meter (2nm/m=2nano= 210 9 =2ppb=20.000 000 001) so the quotients are pure-number coefficients with positive values less than 1. When parts-per notations, including the percent symbol (%), are used in regular prose (as opposed to mathematical expressions), they are still pure-number dimensionless quantities. However, they generally take the literal parts per meaning of a comparative ratio (e.g., 2ppb would generally be interpreted as two parts in a billion parts).[2] Although the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (an international standards organization known also by its French-language initials BIPM) recognizes the use of parts-per notation, it is not formally part of the International System of Units (SI).[2] Consequently, according to IUPAP, a continued source of annoyance to unit purists has been the continued use of percent, ppm, ppb, and ppt. [3] Also, because the named numbers starting with a billion have different values in different countries, the BIPM suggests avoiding the use of ppb and ppt to prevent misunderstanding. Nevertheless, parts-per notation, particularly the expression ppm, remains widely used in technical disciplines because of its convenience in denoting dimensionless quantities. See Alternatives to parts -per notation, below.

Parts-per expressions

One part per hundred is generally represented by the percent (%) symbol and denotes one part per 100 parts, one part in 102, and a value of 1102. This is equivalent to one drop of water diluted into 5 milliliters (one spoon-full), or about fifteen minutes out of one day. One part per thousand is generally spelled out in full and not as ppt (which is usually understood to represent parts per trillion). It may also be denoted by the permille () symbol. Note however, that specific disciplines such as the analysis of ocean water salt concentration and educational exercises occasionally use the ppt abbreviation. One part per thousand denotes one part per 1000 parts, one part in 103, and a value of 1 103. This is equivalent to one drop of water diluted into 50 milliliters (ten spoon-fulls), or about one and a half minutes out of one day. One part per ten thousand is denoted by the permyriad () symbol. It is used almost exclusively in finance, where it is known as the basis point and is typically used to denote fractional changes in percentages. For instance, a change in an interest rate from 5.15% to 5.35% would be denoted as a change of 20 basis points or 20 . Although rarely used in science (ppm is typically used instead), one permyriad has an unambiguous value of one part per 10,000 parts, one part in 104, and a value of 1104. This is equivalent to one drop of water diluted into half a liter, or about nine seconds out of one day. One part per million (ppm) denotes one part per 1,000,000 parts, one part in 106, and a value of 1106. This is equivalent to one drop of water diluted into 50 liters (roughly the fuel tank capacity of a compact car), or about thirty seconds out of a year. One part per billion (ppb) denotes one part per 1,000,000,000 parts, one part in 109, and a value of 1 109. This is equivalent to one drop of water diluted into 250 chemical drums (50m3), or about three seconds out of a century.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_per_million

23-07-2010

Page 3 of 8

One part per trillion (ppt) denotes one part per 1,000,000,000,000 parts, one part in 1012, and a value of 1 1012. This is equivalent to one drop of water diluted into 20 Olympic-size swimming pools (50,000m3), or about three seconds out of every hundred thousand years. One part per quadrillion (ppq) denotes one part per 1,000,000,000,000,000 parts, one part in 1015, and a value of 1 1015. This is equivalent to 1 drop of water diluted into a cube of water measuring approximately 368 meters on a side (fifty million cubic meters, which is a cube about as tall as the roof of the Empire State Building), or two and a half minutes out of the age of the Earth (4.5 billion years). Although relatively uncommon in analytic chemistry, measurements at the ppq level are performed.[4]

SI-compliant expressions In the English language, named numbers have a consistent meaning only up to million. Starting with billion, there are two numbering conventions: the long and short scales, and billion can mean either 109 or 1012. For most of the 19th and 20th centuries, the United Kingdom uniformly used the long scale, while the United States of America used the short scale, so that the two systems were often referred to as British and American usage respectively. Today, the UK uses the short scale exclusively in official and mass media usage and, although some long-scale usage still continues, the terms British and American no longer reflect usage (see also Long and short scales). However, the long scale is dominant in many non-English-speaking areas, including continental Europe and Spanish-speaking countries in Latin America (see also Names of large numbers). Although the BIPM recognizes the use of parts per million (ppm) to represent dimensionless quantities, it cautions that due to the above-mentioned language differences and also because ppt occasionally means parts per thousand, both ppb and ppt should be avoided to prevent misunderstanding.[2] Clearly, this admonition would also apply to parts per quadrillion (ppq) for the same language-based reason. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) takes a more stringent position, stating that the language-dependent terms part per million, part per billion, and part per trillionare not acceptable for use with the SI to express the values of quantities. [5] Note however, that the NISTs stated premise for its position is only partially true; million has only one meaning in all languages. Note too, that although percent (%) is not formally part of the SI, both the BIPM and the ISO, take the position that in mathematical expressions, the internationally recognized symbol%(percent)maybeusedwiththeSItorepresent the number 0.01 for dimensionless quantities.[2][6] Because parts-per notation generally has a well-understood meaning in modern, English-speaking scientific circles, and because its use simplifies the expression of dimensionless quantities, parts-per notation remains widely used in technical disciplines today. Expressions that the BIPM does not explicitly recognize as being suitable for denoting dimensionless quantities with the SI are shown in underlined green text text in the chart below.

NOTATIONS FOR DIMENSIONLESS QUANTITIES Measure A strain of SI units 2 cm/m Named parts-per ratio 2 parts per hundred Parts-per abbreviation or symbol 2% [7] Value in scientific notation 2102

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_per_million

23-07-2010

Page 4 of 8

A sensitivity of A sensitivity of A sensitivity of A sensitivity of A sensitivity of A mass concentration of A mass concentration of A mass concentration of A mass concentration of A volume concentration of

2 mV/V 0.2 mV/V 2 V/V 2 nV/V 2 pV/V 2mg/kg 2g/kg 2ng/kg 2 pg/kg 5.2 L/L

2 parts per thousand 2 parts per ten thousand 2 parts per million 2 parts per billion 2 parts per trillion 2 parts per million 2 parts per billion 2 parts per trillion 2 parts per quadrillion 5.2 parts per million 5.24 parts per million 1 part per million per min. 5 parts per billion 9 parts per billion 1 part per billion 1 part per million 0.3 part per million per C 0.35 part per billion

2 2 2 ppm 2 ppb 2 ppt 2 ppm 2 ppb 2 ppt 2 ppq 5.2 ppm 5.24 ppm 1 ppm/min. 5 ppb 9 ppb 1 ppb 1 ppm 0.3 ppm/C 0.35 ppb

2103 2104 2106 2109 21012 2106 2109 21012 21015 5.2106 5.24106 110 6 /min. 5109 9109 1109 1106 0.3106/ C 0.35109

A molar concentration of 5.24 mol/mol A stability of 1 (A/A)/min. A change of An uncertainty of A shift of A strain of 5 n/ 9g/kg 1nm/m 1m/m

Note that the notations in the SI units column above are all dimensionless quantities; that is, the units of measurement cancel in expressions like 1nm/m (1nm/m= 1nano=1109) so the quotients are pure-number coefficients with values less than 1. Uno Because of the cumbersome nature of expressing certain dimensionless quantities per SI guidelines, the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) in 1999 proposed the adoption of the special name uno (symbol: U) to represent the number 1 in dimensionless quantities.[3] This symbol is not to be confused with the always-italicized symbol for the variable uncertainty (symbol: U). This unit name uno and its symbol could be used in combination with the SI prefixes to express the values of dimensionless quantities which are much lessor even greater than one.[8] Common parts-per notations in terms of the uno are given in the table below. IUPAPs uno proposal Coefficient Parts-per example Uno equiv. Symbol form Value of quantity 102 103 2% 2 2 centiuno 2 cU 2 milliuno 2 mU 2102 2103

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_per_million

23-07-2010

Page 5 of 8

In 2004, a report to the International Committee for Weights and Measures (known also by its French-language initials CIPM) stated that response to the proposal of the uno had been almost entirely negative and the principal proponent recommended dropping the idea. [9] To date, the uno has not been adopted by any standards organization and it appears unlikely it will ever become an officially sanctioned way to express low-value (high-ratio) dimensionless quantities. The proposal was instructive, however, as to the perceived shortcomings of the current options for denoting dimensionless quantities.

Parts-per notation may properly be used only to express true dimensionless quantities; that is, the units of measurement must cancel in expressions like 1mg/kg so that the quotients are pure numbers with values less than 1. Mixed-unit quantities such as a radon concentration of 15 pCi/L are not dimensionless quantities and may not be expressed using any form of parts-per notation, such as 15ppt. Other examples of measures that are not dimensionless quantities are as follows: Particulate matter in the air: 50g/m3 but not:50ppb.Also see Air measurements, below. A stepper motor/gear system that produces a motion of 1 m/pulse but not:1ppm Mercury vapor concentration in air: 0.6 ng/L but not:0.6ppt Note however, that it is not uncommon to express aqueous concentrationsparticularly in drinkingwater reports intended for the general publicusing parts-per notation (2.1ppm,0.8ppb,etc.)and further, for those reports to state that the notations denote milligrams per liter or micrograms per liter. Whereas 2.1mg/L is technically not a dimensionless quantity on the face of it, it is well understood in scientific circles that one liter of water has a mass of one kilogram and that 2.1mg/kg (2.1ppm)isthetruemeasure.Thegoalinalltechnical writing (including drinkingwater reports for the general public) is to clearly communicate to the intended audience with minimal confusion. Drinking water is intuitively a volumetric quantity in the publics mind so measures of contamination expressed on a per-liter basis are considered to be easier to grasp. Still, it is technically possible, for example, to "dissolve" more than one liter of a very hydrophilic chemical in 1 liter of water; parts-per notation would be confusing when describing its solubility in water (greater than a million parts per million), so one would simply state the volume (or mass) that will dissolve into a liter, instead. When reporting air-borne rather than water-borne densities, a slightly different convention is used since air is approximately 1000 times less dense than water. In water, 1g/m3 is roughly equivalent to parts-per-trillion whereas in air, it is roughly equivalent to parts-per-billion. Note also, that in the case of air, this convention is much less accurate. Whereas one liter of water is almost exactly 1 kg; one cubic meter of air is often taken as 1.143kgclose enough for many practical uses.[citation needed]

Parts-per notations may be expressed in terms of any unit of the same measure. For instance, the coefficient of thermal expansion of a certain brass alloy, =18.7ppm/C,maybeexpressedas 18.7(m/m)/C, or as 18.7 (in/in)/C; the numeric value representing a relative proportion does not change with the adoption of a different unit of measure.[10] Similarly, a metering pump that injects a trace chemical into the main process line at the proportional flow rate Qp=125ppm, is doing so at a

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_per_million

23-07-2010

Page 6 of 8

rate that may be expressed in a variety of volumetric units, including 125 L/L, 125 gal/gal, 125 (m3)/m3, etc.

Air measurements

Often, parts-per notation is the simplest and best measure. But other times, it is less suitable or even impossible. This sometimes results in agencies such as the World Health Organization or US EPA presenting entire tables of air concentrations that use the weight/volume method, when parts-per notation might have more readily worked for many (but not all) substances present. While many contaminants can be easily described using parts-per notation, a few of them present a much more complex picture. A case in point is when measuring gasoline (a.k.a. petrol). It's a very complex mixture which might have dozens or hundreds of types of molecules present, in air. It would require sophisticated, extremely expensive analysis to enumerate all of a given sample's molecules and give it an accurate parts-per measurement - and that measurement would probably not be comparable to any other gasoline parts-per concentration, because the petroleum mixture of the second sample would be different. (Batches of petroleum product differ considerably; as an extreme example, gasoline fractions have a far higher parts-per count - many more molecules per molecule of air - compared to a heavier petroleum product like diesel, for a given weight per volume measure at STP.) Therefore, a mass per volume concentration unit (such as mg/m3) is almost always used for petroleum vapors, as well as for certain other complex mixtures. If one is dealing with a single known diluent (contaminant), it is easy to convert from parts-per notation to mass per volume concentration, using the substance's molecular weight (Mr) in the following types of equations:

For example, 1 ppm of toluene (Mr=92.15g/mol)is equivalent to a 3.8 mg/m3 concentration. The constant 24.45 L/mol is the molar volume of an ideal gas at 25 C and 1 atmosphere: for different pressures and temperatures, this value needs to be recomputed.

See also

International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) International Organization for Standardization (ISO) International System of Units (SI) Long and short scales Mole fraction Names of large numbers National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Percentage (%) Permille () Permyriad () (Basis point) SI prefixes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_per_million

23-07-2010

Page 7 of 8

References

1. ^ This is a simplified explanation. Laser rangefinders typically have a measurement granularity of one to ten millimeters; thus, the complete specification for distance measurement accuracy might read as follows:Accuracy: (1mm+1ppm). Consequently, a distance measurement of only a few meters would still have an accuracy of 1mmin this example. 2. ^ a b c d BIPM: 5.3.7 Stating values of dimensionless quantities, or quantities of dimension one (http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/chapter5/5-3-7.html) 3. ^ a b Report to the 1999 IUPAP General Assembly: Report on recent Committee activities on behalf of IUPAP by Brian W Petley September 1998 (http://www.iupap.org/commissions/interunion/iu14/ga99.html) 4. ^ Measurements of dioxin are routinely made at the sub-ppq level. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently sets a hard limit of 30 ppq for dioxin in drinking water but once recommended a voluntary limit of 0.013ppq.Also,radioactivecontaminantsindrinkingwater,whichare quantified by measuring their radiation, are often reported in terms of ppq. The ability to chemically detect contaminants at this level is truly an impressive feat; 0.013 ppq is equivalent to the thickness of a sheet of paper versus a journey of 146,000 trips around the world. 5. ^ NIST: Rules and Style Conventions for Expressing Values of Quantities: 7.10.3 ppm, ppb, and ppt (http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec07.html#7.10.3) 6. ^ Quantities and units - Part 0: General principles, ISO 31-0:1992. 7. ^ Compliance with the SI regarding the percent symbol (%) is limited in this chart. According to the BIPMs SI brochure: Subsection 5.3.3, Formatting the value of a quantity (http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/chapter5/5-3-2.html#5-3-3) , a space is always used to separate the unit symbol from the numeric value. Notable exceptions are the unit symbols for degree, minute, and secondforplaneangle,,,and(e.g.,alatitudeof47 38 8.8). However, according to 5.3.7 Stating values of dimensionless quantities, or quantities of dimension one (http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/chapter5/5-3-7.html) , the exception does not apply to the % symbol; it states as follows: When it [the percent symbol] is used, a space separates the number and the symbol%. This practice has not been well adopted with regard to the % symbol, is contrary to Wikipedias Manual of Style, and is not observed here. 8. ^ Certain mathematical functions can produce proportional quantities with values greater than 1. 9. ^ Report of the 16th meeting (1314 May 2004), by the Consultative Committee for Units, to the International Committee for Weights and Measures, of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (1.1MB PDF, here (http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf) ). 10. ^ In the particular case of coefficient of thermal expansion, the change to inches (one of the U.S. customary units) is typically also accompanied by a change to degrees Fahrenheit. Since a Fahrenheitsized interval of temperature is only 59 that of a Celsius-sized interval, the value is typically expressed as 10.4(in/in)/F rather than 18.7(in/in)/C.

External links

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): Home page (http://www.nist.gov/) International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM): Home page (http://www.bipm.org/en/home/) Concentration Calculator and Concentration Converter (http://www.etoolsage.com/converter/consistency.asp?toolsort=6000) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts-per_notation" Categories: Analytical chemistry | Chemical nomenclature | Dimensionless numbers | Environmental chemistry | Mathematical terminology | Measurement | Metrics | Physical constants | Units of measure This page was last modified on 7 July 2010 at 02:49. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_per_million

23-07-2010

Page 8 of 8

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_per_million

23-07-2010

- Pacing Formula(surveying/engineering)Caricato dadrein25
- Advanced Mine Surveying.pdfCaricato daShah Kairav
- Tutorial 1Caricato daChong Cherng Wong
- S7-300_400 Tip Analog Scaling Tip No. 1Caricato damail87523
- MetallothioneinCaricato dalordniklaus
- Assigning Abs ConfigurationCaricato daPrakash Akash
- PBICaricato daAyuuk Loph-loph Aguus
- Pulp CappingCaricato daDrasma Channa
- InstrumentalCaricato daHugo W
- Practica 3 ReactoresCaricato daPandiitap Emoxiitap Neniitap
- Jurnal Tumbuhan PakuCaricato daAri Masturi
- TM KubiakCaricato datarun_lol
- homework 4 - transient thermal analysis of a laptop standCaricato daapi-120516727
- 9631U-G-JSD-1300-0021-3Caricato daUtku Kepcen
- pp1802d.pdfCaricato dadicky saputra
- Surveying 1 - 09 Civil - Sir Allah Bux : Dk MamonaiCaricato daDarya Memon
- c1ce02 c1106 Surveying Set1Caricato dabhkedar
- CONSTRUCTION-SURVEYING-COURSE-OUTLINECaricato daGR Biju
- Omar Lecture.pptCaricato dakirbey
- Dasbhodh Original ScriptCaricato daapa605
- YSI 550ADO ManualCaricato daLuis Zelaya
- MultiplCaricato daveenadivyakish
- J41 Lab runCaricato daJ31415
- Sensor Limit ValuesCaricato daErick Parra
- Force Calibration Guide (256)Caricato daDavid Lizandro Rojas
- Topographic Map of Jasper WestCaricato daHistoricalMaps
- GazetteT05-02-25Caricato daMunzila Husein
- _Measuring Tools.docxCaricato daChristianjade Zamora
- jjjCaricato daAafaqIqbal
- Topographic Map of RowdenCaricato daHistoricalMaps

- Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2015 What is NewCaricato daRangel Sonaglio
- Logistics Reading ListCaricato daPower Power
- ISBN-Safe-erection-of-structural-steel-for-buildings-industry-standard-2009-05.pdfCaricato daPower Power
- Erection Method StatementCaricato daDilxan Fdo
- Phoenix S-Wall Technical-Manual EnCaricato daRavikanth Aluri
- Hazop StudiCaricato daAshkan Khajouie
- BHEL tolerance for column.pdfCaricato daelangorenga
- Cleansing of Entire Digestive TractCaricato daPower Power
- X-CBSE-2016-Maths-Analysis.pdfCaricato daPower Power
- Hindi Text for leaningCaricato daPower Power
- Rust o Cap Lx Pc2761Caricato daPower Power
- Surface PreparationCaricato daPriyanathan Thayalan
- Tower_Model _generation NewCaricato daPower Power
- India Today how modi takes to next levelCaricato daPower Power
- We Need to Support Ayurveda Just Like We Did With YogaCaricato daPower Power
- ExecutionCaricato daPower Power
- 2003_cofiring_eu_bionetCaricato dag00013899
- CD Instructor ManualCaricato daJoey E. Crumby
- Detroit Stoker CatalogCaricato daPower Power
- 2014 en Aggarangsi Pep Infoveranstaltung Biogas Biomasse Philippinen ThailandCaricato daPower Power
- Amonia plant - RisksCaricato daanburishi
- Rock Dust Revised PoliciesCaricato dapower group
- Catalog Chptech 4Caricato daHayat Khan
- ID Fan Designing questioneareCaricato daMuhammad
- Preventing Explosions In IndustryCaricato daPower Power
- Sage Stein 2005Caricato daPower Power
- statutoryclearancesgreenfieldcaptivecoalmineCaricato daPower Power
- Efficient Engineering r 0Caricato daPower Power
- Turbine DesignCaricato daknsaravana
- Excel to Revit converter.xlsCaricato daPower Power

- TTT Handout LG Nov2008 Lecture Note on EC3 DesignCaricato daNguyen Tran Hieu
- Code Lagos -Learn Programming With PythonCaricato daAdenekan Therhophic Orlanshilay
- Beginning Algebra Lab NotebookCaricato daJuan Dela Cruz
- Solution of Firefly Algorithm for the Economic Thermal Power Dispatch With Emission Constraint in Various Generation PlantsCaricato daGiovanni Eliezer
- Through WallCaricato daanon_206575873
- A SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS APPROACH TO STOCKHAUSEN'S PROBLEMCaricato daShaahin Pmn
- Ec 6602 Antenna and Wave Propagation Important QuestionsCaricato daKarthika Ar
- Addressing Misalignment Between Information Security Metrics and Business-driven Security ObjectivesCaricato dagiovanni_giudici
- Implementing Common Business Calculations in DAX - Chris WebbCaricato daWei Deng
- Predicting Bed Thickness With Cepstral DecompositionCaricato daMohand76
- Embedded Systems Unit ViCaricato daSreekanth Pagadapalli
- EDU OT1 EnglishManualCaricato daGelium
- Solved Quantitative Aptitude Paper of Bank P.OCaricato daapi-26403048
- Neutrino a True ParticleCaricato daIJSTR Research Publication
- Quadrantal Spherical Triangles.docxCaricato daFebelyn Tapic
- 2. Equilibrium of Force SystemCaricato danirvan93
- Coil Gun Object Detect MethodCaricato dashawnleegabriel
- Wipro Updated Qus..pdfCaricato damuskan jain
- ex2_ansCaricato daDeepali Patil
- [Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics] Exact Analytical Solutions for Contaminant Transport in Rivers 1. the Equilibrium Advection-dispersion EquationCaricato daDomenico Barillari
- Tere Liye - PulangCaricato daastria puspita
- PF lab 1Caricato daMuhammad Umair
- Breadth-first Search - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaCaricato daSourav Das
- B. Tech. Syllabus (Mining)Caricato daSohil Bakshi
- Preinfome_Lab3Caricato daGatoBecker
- Proj08 ECG NotesCaricato daMatthew Hon
- Desire and Liberation by Vaddera ChandidasCaricato dadeekshith
- An Effective Continuum Damage Mechanics Model for CreepCaricato daJessica Sanders
- SimPower Kundur Two Area.pdfCaricato daRian Fatah Mochamad
- Power Transformer Remnant LifeCaricato darosario.md1052

## Molto più che documenti.

Scopri tutto ciò che Scribd ha da offrire, inclusi libri e audiolibri dei maggiori editori.

Annulla in qualsiasi momento.