Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
He is Positive,
in vali vadam.
(1) Vali was adharmic in having driven out his younger brother
why did he spare Sugreeva who took up Tara (Vali’s wife) later?
There are other reasons cited , but each one of them stands to be countered.
So the nuances of how this act was dharmic lies somewhere in between
could Rama had given him the end in the way as it was?
As until long Vali was not in any way connected with Him,
indirect mode.
Rama’s commitment to
Rama?
I would have killed Ravana in combat, pulled him to you and got back Sita.
It is perfectly legitimate
before he collapses.
as an offence.
(He says that the entire Bhoo mandalam is under His dynasty (Ram Rajya?))
that he had failed to carry out the dharma in his (Vali’s) land?
He knew the one who had abducted her (Ravana) was once defeated by him.
So did Vali.
to execute Raj-dharma.
But that he had failed in his duty has indirectly offended Rama.
By remaining passive,
is known as abetting.
crime committed.
punished him.
‘praayaschittham’ (atonement).
His repeated
in effect is aimed
nor did Ruma think it necessary to demonstrate her pathi vradhai quality.
To elaborate on this,
understanding Dharma,
circumstances.