Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

Rell’s UConn Consulting Project Worth Investigating

October 18, 2009 Sadly, Mrs. Rell insists that violations” of state campaign
nothing is wrong and that she’s financing laws by Mrs. Rell and
Gov. M. Jodi Rell could “proud” of the project. her campaign committee with
accomplish part of her stated goal regard to Mr. Dautrich’s services.
of streamlining state government But in the past few days, the roof Elections Enforcement should
by firing the crew of advisers has partly fallen in. mount an investigation.
who talked her into spending
more than $220,000 of taxpayer For one thing, e-mail evidence It’s disappointing that a governor
money for work by a University of contradicts her assertion that the who followed the disgraced
Connecticut consultant. idea of conducting a publicly John G. Rowland into office
financed field poll was dropped promising that ethics would be
The highly secret project — last year. The e-mail in question, her watchword has landed in this
unearthed through open-records between two UConn officials, kind of trouble.
requests — turns out to be, in suggests the poll idea was alive as
part, partisan political research recently as late January. Copyright © 2009, The Hartford Courant
that could help her re-election bid
if she decides to run for a second Further, the UConn project is
full term. now the subject of at least two
investigations. One is an inquiry
The money to pay for advice by state Attorney General Richard
from polling expert and UConn Blumenthal (a Democrat) and
professor Ken Dautrich on how to the bipartisan auditors of public
shape the governor’s message was accounts as to whether, Auditor
taken from a contingency account Kevin Johnston said, “state tax
— commonly called a “slush dollars have been used for other
fund” — in the state budget for than strictly state purposes.”
use by top elected officials. Mrs.
Rell has criticized the use of The other is an inquiry by
contingency funds in the past, but UConn’s Office of Audit
not this time. Whatever account Compliance and Ethics, which
the money came from, it was university spokesman Michael
dead wrong to use even a dime Kirk said is “examining the
of public money for political research associated with this
research. project to determine if it may
have violated any aspect of
If the idea for this misbegotten UConn’s code of ethics.”
project was hatched by advisers
on her payroll, she’d do well to On Tuesday, Democratic political
start the streamlining there: It was consultant Jonathan Pelto filed a
terrible advice. If it was her idea, complaint with the State Elections
for shame. Enforcement Commission
charging “serious and significant

Potrebbero piacerti anche