Seattle University

INTEGRITY FORMATION

Erin Lewis
SDAD 564 100 hours

TODAYS AGENDA
Background Information
Mission & Values Integrity Formation Demographics Site Supervisor

The Internship

Personal Goals & Work Plan Objectives Accomplishments & Contributions Significant Learning Opportunities

Theory to Practice
Chickering Schlossberg

Now What?

Professional Insights Future Direction

MISSION & VALUES

MISSION: Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world VISION: We will be the premier independent university of the Northwest in academic quality, Jesuit Catholic inspiration, and service to society VALUES: Care, Academic Excellence, Diversity, Faith, Justice, Leadership

INTEGRITY FORMATION
VISION: To provide an integrity formation experience that encourages individual accountability, promotes civic engagement, guides personal growth, and cultivates ethical development as students discern and clarify their own values. MISSION: The mission of the office of integrity formation is to promote and create opportunities for awareness, dialogue, and critical engagement with integrity, justice, and ethical decision making. Through a holistic educational approach students will model community standards, clarify their personal integrity and actively develop their role as global citizens. Goals of the Integrity Formation Process
To educate students by explaining the reasons and purpose for community standards. To help student's clarify and articulate their personal values. To aid students in aligning their personal integrity with community standards. To assist students in making conscious choices that will enable them to lead as global citizens.

CONDUCT DEMOGRAPHICS
C lass
First-Year: 43.48% Second Year: 34.78% Third-Year: 13.04% Fourth-Year: 4.35%

Gender
Female: 45% Male: 50% Not Applicable: 5%

Transfer student?
Yes: 8.7% No: 91.3%

On-campus resident?
Yes: 91.3% No: 8.7%

SITE SUPERVISOR

Darrell Goodwin
Dean of Students

PERSONAL GOALS
To gain insight into the world of conduct that will help me in my professional discernment process To turn theory into practice in my one -on-one developmental conversations with students To better understand my own professional identity, explore my values and the ethical decision -making process that accompanies that To continue my own leadership development

WORK PLAN OBJECTIVES

To explore and learn the conduct process at SU in comparison to other institutions To adjudicate one -onone conduct hearings with students, as well as through participation on two conduct boards: Integrity Board and Conduct Review board To work with various conduct officers to facilitate Integrity Development Workshops for students that are grounded in student development theory

ACCOMPLISHMENTS & CONTRIBUTIONS

Adjudicated over 15 student conduct cases Served on Integrity Board and Conduct Review Board Co-facilitated Integrity Development Workshops Participated in the revamping of SUs sexual assault website Managed and updated the Students of Concern database

SIGNIFICANT LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Adjudicating conduct hearings all by myself!

Working with Darrell on updating the sexual assault website Having the Dean of Students as a mentor

THEORY TO PRACTICE

Chickering
Integrity Development Workshops

Schlossberg
One-on-one conversations with students, particularly first-years

CHICKERING ACTIVITY!
Developing Competence Managing Emotions Moving through Autonomy toward Interdependence Developing Mature Interpersonal Relationships Establishing Identity Developing Purpose Developing Integrity

PROFESSIONAL INSIGHTS & FUTURE DIRECTION

Professional Insights
Working one-on-one with students Developmental conversations and incorporating theory in conversations Blending policy/procedure with relational aspects and student interaction Thrive in environments that require high level of integrity and ethical decision-making Intent versus impact

Future Direction
Dean of Students Conduct and policy Student contact Crisis/risk management

SUMMARY
Background Information
Mission & Values Integrity Formation Demographics Site Supervisor

The Internship

Personal Goals & Work Plan Objectives Accomplishments & Contributions Significant Learning Opportunities

Theory to Practice
Chickering Schlossberg

Now What?

Professional Insights Future Direction

QUESTIONS?

REFERENCES
Schlossberg , N.K. (2010). Schlossbergs transition theory. In J.N. Evans, D.S. Forney, F.M. Guido, L.D. Patton & K.A. Renn (Eds.), Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice (2 nd edition) (pp. 212-226). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Chickering, A.W. (2010). Chickerings theory of identity development. In J.N. Evans, D.S. Forney, F.M. Guido, L.D. Patton & K.A. Renn (Eds.), Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice (2 nd edition) (pp. 64-81). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.