Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

STC LTE FDD 4G1 Project

STC LTE-TD Radio Network Acceptance

Cluster/Site Initial Tuning Report

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Cluster /Site Name Drive test date Test interaction Test Type Analyzed by Date of report submission

ETF827 28.05.2013 Scanner / Scanner + UE

STC 2012 All rights reserved. The information in this document is the property of STC. Except as specifically authorized in writing by STC, the receiver of this document shall keep the information contained here confidential and shall protect the same in whole or in part from disclosure and dissemination to third parties. Disclosure and disseminations to the receiver's employees shall only be made on a strict need to know basis. The information in this document is subject to change without notice and STC assumes no responsibility for factual in accuracies or typographical errors.

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

1 CLUSTER OVERVIEW...............................................................................................4 2 SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS.........................................................................................5 3 TEST METHODOLOGIES..........................................................................................5 4 REFERENCE SIGNAL................................................................................................5 4.1 BEST SERVER...................................................................................................5 4.1.1 Best serve Plots............................................................................................6 4.2 RSRP CLUSTER RESULTS.................................................................................7 4.2.1 RSRP Plots prior and after initial tuning activities.........................................6 4.3 RSRQ CLUSTER RESULTS.................................................................................8 4.3.1 RSRQ Plots Prior and After initial tuning activities........................................8 4.3.2 RSRQ Statistics.............................................................................................9 4.3.3 RSRP and RSRQ Statistics..........................................................................10 4.4 SINR CLUSTER RESULTS..................................................................................11 4.4.1 SINR Plots....................................................................................................11 4.4.2 SINR Statistics.............................................................................................12 5 THROUGHPUT ANALYSES......................................................................................13 5.1 ACTUAL DL THROUGHPUT FROM UE.................................................................13 5.2 DL THROUGHPUT PLOT.....................................................................................14 5.2.1 DL Throughput vs. SINR Statistics..............................................................15 5.3 ACTUAL UL THROUGHPUT FROM UE.................................................................16 5.4 UL THROUGHPUT PLOT.....................................................................................17 5.4.1 UL Throughput vs. SINR Statistics..............................................................18 5.4.2 End to End Latency Statistics RTT (Round Trip Time)................................19 6 TROUBLE SPOTS AND AREAS..............................................................................19 7 CHANGE REQUESTS..............................................................................................19 7.1 PHYSICAL CHANGE REQUESTS........................................................................20 7.2 PARAMETER CHANGE REQUESTS....................................................................20 7.3 DRIVE TEST DIARY..........................................................................................21 7.4 ALARM DETAILS..............................................................................................21 8 APPENDIXES...........................................................................................................21 9 DISTRIBUTION LIST................................................................................................21

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

KPI and Configuration Check List

Cluster Site list:
Site ID ETF827 ETF827 ETF827 Site Name ETF827A ETF827B ETF827C

Backhaul capacity check: Designed Capacity E2E capacity check Source Configuration Status (Matched/unmatched)

CGI: Cell ETF827A ETF827B ETF827C Value

TAC ETF827

/ 2013

Site name Approved Configuration Check list:

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Item Feature: LTE Session continuity to GSM/3G Feature: LTE Reselection to GSM/3G Feature: Intra-Automatic Neighbor Reporting Feature: Inter-Automatic Neighbor Reporting Feature: GSM/3G reselection to LTE Feature: Directed reselection to LTE from 2G/3G Feature: SMS origination/termination within LTE Feature: Multi Technology HO between FDD>TDD>FDD Feature: CSFB to 3G(UMTS 2100) Feature: MIMO type Feature: CSFB to 3G(UMTS900) Feature: X2 Handover Number of concurrent users license

Information Source CM LTE & DT CM LTE & DT CM LTE & DT or trace CM LTE & DT or trace CM 2G/3G & DT CM GSM/3G & DT CM LTE Only CM LTE Only CM LTE Only CM LTE& LTE CM 3G/GSM CM LTE & DT CM LTE

Status

If Applicable

System priority: Technology LTE TDD 2.3 LTE FDD 1800 3G 1st carrier 3G 2nd carrier 3G 3rd carrier GSM Priority 1 2 3 4 5 6

Test -KPI Session Setup Success rate

DL_SINR>0dB DL_RSRP>100dBm

Value (Min, Avg, Max)

LIMIT

RESULT (PASS/FAIL)
pass/Fail

COMMENT

97.00%

Minutes between E-RAB Abnormal Releases

25min

pass/Fail

/ 2013

Site name Approved Session Abnormal Release Rate

DL_SINR>0dB DL_RSRP>100dBm

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

2.00%

pass/Fail

Mobility LTE Intra Handover Success Rate CSFB (Idle) MO Success Rate % CSFB (Dedicated) MO Success Rate % CSFB (Idle) MT Success Rate % CSFB (Dedicated) MT Success Rate % SMS MO Idle Success Rate % SMS MO Dedicated Success Rate % SMS MT Idle Success Rate % SMS MT Dedicated Success Rate %

100%
95.00% pass/Fail

Pass

100%

99% 99%

Pass/Fail Pass/Fail

100%

99% 99%

Pass/Fail Pass/Fail

99% 99%

Pass/Fail Pass/Fail

99% 99%

Pass/Fail Pass/Fail

*) This Target value is the standard value that must be met using a conventional LTE SIM card during the drive test.

Overall result: Comments:

Brief Description of the overall results Drive test KPI details: Ping Server: IP= 10.16.17.253 UL/DL FTP Server: IP= 10.16.17.253 All drive test KPI are collected by only TEMS Investigation measurements. Miscellaneous:

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Cluster/Site Overview

Figure 1 Cluster/Site Location on Map

Figure 1 Cluster/Site Location on Map

Figure 1 Cluster/Site Location on Map

Number of Sites in cluster or Site Name: Integration Status: Alarm Status (from integrated sites): Cell Availability (from integrated sites): EARFCN(s) DL/UL: DL/UL Configuration: Bandwidth: Test Duration:

ETF827

1752/19752 10 MHZ

Table 1: Summary of Cluster/Site status

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Summary of Analysis
<Insert summary of results and of any suggestions for improvement specifying desired outcome> <All results in details are summarized in the Final Acceptance report >

Test Methodology
<Insert description of the drive test methodology and equipment used during the drive test> Insert short description of the drive test route and the difficulties and circumstances faced during the drive test, if any] [This chapter should be the same for all clusters unless changes are required]

Reference Signal
Below are the results of the scanned reference signal data from the cluster. All data presented is binned at 25m intervals

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

4.1

Best Server

4.1.1 Best server Plots

Figure 2: Best Server Plot (no Binning)

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

4.2

RSRP Cluster Results

4.2.1 RSRP Plots prior and after initial tuning activities

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Figure 3: Cluster RSRP After initial tuning activities Scanner [binned]

4.2.2 RSRP Statistics

See Table for breakdown of RSRP samples statistics for drive area

Figure 4: Cluster RSRP Distribution After initial tuning activities [No Binning]

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

4.3

RSRQ Cluster Results

4.3.1 RSRQ Plots prior and after initial tuning activities

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Figure 5: Cluster RSRQ After initial tuning activities Scanner [binned]

4.3.2 RSRQ Statistics

See Table for breakdown of RSRQ samples statistics for drive area

Figure 6: Cluster RSRQ Distribution After initial tuning activities [No Binning]

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

4.3.3 RSRP and RSRQ Statistics

Table 2: Cluster RSRP vs. RSRQ After initial tuning activities Scanner [binned]

Target (in case available full cluster): 80% of the measured samples within the cluster are fulfilling: RSRP >= -110dBm and RSRQ >= -15dBm

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date
Figure 7: RSRP vs. RSRQ Distribution After initial tuning activities

28.05.2013

4.4SINR Cluster Results

Below is the SINR Analysis, based on the SINR report.

4.4.1SINR Plots

Figure 8: Cluster SINR After initial tuning activities - Scanner [binned]

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

4.4.2 SINR Statistics

Figure 9: SINR Distribution after initial tuning activities [No Binning]

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

5
5.1

Throughput Analysis
Actual DL Throughput from UE
DL Throughput data reported from LTE UE for FTP Sessions

5.2

DL Throughput plot

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date
Figure 10: Cluster DL Throughput Plot [No Binning]

28.05.2013

5.2.1 DL Throughput vs. SINR Statistics

Graph of all measured samples throughput values recorded during drive test

Figure 11: Cluster DL Throughput vs. SINR [No Binning]

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Target: see below table:

Average DL User Throughput Stationary Test (best location) No condition

Value ( average, max)

Target
55 Mbps

Result (pass/fail)
pass/Fail

Comment
Red Target Value can only be considered if STC provides Vendor with Priority LTE class SIM card.

Avg: 71.7 Mbps Max: 73.5 Mbps

70 Mbps

Average DL User Throughput (DLUT) Mobile

DLUT Quality Low (Cell edge) 0dB DL_SINR < 7dB DL_RSRP>-100dBm DLUT Medium (Mid Cell) 7dB DL_SINR < 15.5dB DL_RSRP>-100dBm DLUT High (Under antennas) DL_SINR 15.5dB DL_RSRP>-100dBm

Value ( average, max)

Avg: 31.2 Mbps Max: 34.3 Mbps

Target
5.5 Mbps *) 7 Mbps

Result (pass/fail)
pass/Fail

Comment
Red Target Value can only be considered if STC provides Vendor with Priority LTE class SIM card. Red Target Value can only be considered if STC provides Vendor with Priority LTE class SIM card. Red Target Value can only be considered if STC provides Vendor with Priority LTE class SIM card.

Avg: 49.3 Mbps Max: 52.3 Mbps

11 Mbps *) 14 Mbps

pass/Fail

20 Mbps *) 30 Mbps Avg: 71.7 Mbps Max: 73.5 Mbps

pass/Fail

*) This Target value is the standard value that must be met using a conventional LTE SIM card during the drive test.

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

5.3

Actual UL Throughput from UE

UL Throughput data reported from LTE UE for FTP Sessions

5.4

UL Throughput plot

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date
Figure 12: Cluster UL Throughput Plot [No Binning]

28.05.2013

5.4.1 UL Throughput vs. SINR Statistics Graph of all throughput samples values recorded during drive test

Figure 13: Cluster UL Throughput vs. SINR [No Binning]

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Target: see below table Average UL User Throughput Stationary Test (best location) No condition Value ( average, max) Target Result (pass/fail)
pass/Fail Avg: 23.0 Mbps Max: 25.9 Mbps 10 Mbps

Comment
Red Target Value can only be considered if STC provides Vendor with Priority LTE class SIM card.

Average UL User Throughput (ULUT)

ULUT Quality Low (Cell edge) -100dBm DL_RSRP < -90dBm ULUT Medium (Mid Cell) -90dBm DL_RSRP < -80dBm ULUT High (Under Antenna) DL_RSRP -80dBm

Value ( average, max)

Avg: 5.6 Mbps Max: 8.6 Mbps

Target

Result (pass/fail)
pass/Fail

Comment
Red Target Value can only be considered if STC provides Vendor with Priority LTE class SIM card. Red Target Value can only be considered if STC provides Vendor with Priority LTE class SIM card. Red Target Value can only be considered if STC provides Vendor with Priority LTE class SIM card.

1.5 Mbps

pass/Fail Avg: 19.0 Mbps Max:22.4 Mbps 2.5 Mbps

pass/Fail Avg: 23.0 Mbps Max: 25.9 Mbps 5 Mbps

*) This Target value is the standard value that must be met using a conventional LTE SIM card during the drive test.

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

5.4.2 End to End Latency Statistics RTT (Round Trip Time)

All RTT values recorded by the second UE during drive test

Target: see below table

Round Trip Time RTT (msec) Stationary

Value (min, average,)

14 ms

Target
35 ms 45 ms

Result (pass/fail)
pass/Fail

No condition (32 bytes data) RAN located at different geographical area as the EPC there is a large distance between the two entities.
Round Trip Time (RTT) Mobile DL_SINR>0dB DL_RSRP>-100dBm Excluding the worst 2..5% of RTT values. RAN located at the same geographical area as the EPC Round Trip Time (RTT) Mobile DL_SINR>0dB DL_RSRP>-100dBm Excluding the worst 2..5% of RTT Values. RAN located at different geographical area as the EPC there is a large distance between the two entities.

15 ms 35ms Pass/fail

45ms

Pass/fail

Trouble Spots and areas

<Insert any considerable difficulties faced during drive test as well as during the initial tuning of the cluster and where Vendor might need support from STC > <Insert technical remedies and solutions in order to enhance the quality of the RSRP, RSRQ, SINR, DL TP and UL TPetc at these particular trouble spots and areas>. <Insert any comment related to these particular trouble spots and areas that you want to share with the Optimization Responsible at STC>.

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

Getting interference in Sec-B

Figure 14: Trouble Spot/Area Map

Change Requests
List of all change requests made during the initial tuning activities

7.1

Physical Change Requests

<Insert Physical Change requests Tracker for cluster/ Site>

Site ID

Changes

Old value

New value

Comment

7.2

Parameter Change Requests

<Insert Cluster/ Site wide parameter changes>
Site ID Parameter Previous value New Value Comment

/ 2013

Site name Approved

ETF827 Date 28.05.2013

7.3

Drive test Diary

<Insert drive test diary as xls object if needed>

7.4

Alarm Details

<Insert alarm printout for alarms checked during drive>

Site ID Alarm type Cause of the Alarm Date of clearance Comment

Appendixes
<Insert any valuable appendix> TEMS log files, Cluster list of sites

Distribution List
For your Information
1. xx 2. xx 3. xx

Receiver 1. xx 2. xx 3. xx

/ 2013