Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
!"#$
!"%$
!"&$
!"'$
Example
! Suppose A wants to acquire firm B. ! Firm B has had the following cash flows this past year Sales: $10M, Costs: $5M, Depreciation: $1M, Tax: 40% Sales and Costs are expected to grow at the rate of inflation (4%) Depreciation of existing machinery will decline by 3% each year If acquired by firm A, sales will grow by an additional 3% p.a. (costs will remain a constant proportion of sales in real terms) If M denotes the market portfolio, then we also have the following information from the securities markets: !A=30% !B=40% !M=20% E[rM]-rf=6% "AB=-0.3 "AM=-0.7 "BM=0.8 rf=6%
Advanced Corporate Finance, Vasil Revishvili, vrevishvili@cu.edu.ge
!()$
!(!$
Example
The beta of firm B is given by
!(*$
!(+$
If we know a firms capital structure, its required return on debt and its required return on equity, then we can determine its WACC If the investment under consideration looks just like the rest of the firm (e.g. expansion of capacity), then the WACC of the existing firm is the correct discount rate to use. If the investment is different from the existing firm, then we need to compute the WACC appropriate for the project under consideration (possibly firm comparable firms data)!
Advanced Corporate Finance, Vasil Revishvili, vrevishvili@cu.edu.ge
!("$
!(($
So what is remaining?
The problem is that we only observe the equity beta of levered firms 1)! If a firm changes its leverage, its beta will change. That means that we cannot use the (unadjusted) past beta if the future calls for a different capital structure. In fact, if the amount of debt used to finance a project is different from that of the overall firm, then the (unadjusted) beta of the overall firm cannot be used. 2)! If we want to use the average beta of several firms in an industry, we cannot simply use the beta estimated from their stock prices, because this beta will be distorted by all sorts of different capital structures. Only the asset risk of all the companies is comparable (i.e. the risk that remains when all the capital structure effects are stripped away)
Advanced Corporate Finance, Vasil Revishvili, vrevishvili@cu.edu.ge
!(#$
!(%$
D(1 ! t ) rE = rU + [ rU ! rD ] E
If you are interested in derivation of this formula contact me by email.
Advanced Corporate Finance, Vasil Revishvili, vrevishvili@cu.edu.ge
!(&$
!('$
D(1 ! t ) ! E = rU + [ !U ! ! D ] E
Advanced Corporate Finance, Vasil Revishvili, vrevishvili@cu.edu.ge
!#)$
E !U = !E D(1 ! t ) + E
D(1 ! t ) E + D(1 ! t ) EV ! Dt ! E = !U + !U = !U = !U E E E Where EV is Enterprise Value
Advanced Corporate Finance, Vasil Revishvili, vrevishvili@cu.edu.ge
!#!$
Use of WACC
The easy case: if the firm is traded, and had the same capital structure in the past as it will have in the future, and there is little worry about estimation risk 1)! Estimate the equity beta 2)! Estimate the forward looking cost of debt (probably from the debt rating, or from very recently issued debt) 3)! Plug the into the WACC formula, using the target capital structure and the forward looking marginal tax rate
!#*$
Use of WACC
The more difficult case: if our own firms past risk or capital structure is not applicable for the valuation at hand (or you want to look at more than one firm to avoid estimation error), we will have to look at comparable companies 1)! Find a few companies with the same beta risk (i.e. in the same line of business) as the project/acquisition under consideration. 2)! Measure these comparables rE, rD, t, and D/E 3)! Use these data to compute a WACC
!#+$
!#"$
Use of WACC
Once we have computed the un-levered cost of capital rU, we can average it among all comparable firms
!#($
Use of WACC
The new cost of debt comes from (i) an estimate, (ii) a guess as to what the firms credit rating will be, or (iii) the old cost od debt. Which is most appropriate depends on the situation and the firm The new cost of equity is determined as follows:
D(1 ! t ) rE = rU + [ rU ! rD ] E
Now that we have the new cost of equity and debt, we can compute the WACC from
!##$
Example
You target a debt-to-equity ratio of 20%. The tax rate is 40%. Other firms in the industry are firms A & B. rf is 7%, (rm-rf)=5% Firm A: D/E=60%, rD=10%, #E=1.6 => rE=7%+1.6x5%=15% Firm B: D/E=100%, rD=12%, #E=2 => rE=7%+2x5%=17% Firm A: rU=0.265x10%+0.735x15%=13.675% Firm B: rU=0.375x12%+0.625x17%=15.125% (we average Firm A and Firm B rUs and get rU=14.4% Assume that your rD (with a 20% leverage) is 8%. Then you get D(1 ! t ) rE = rU + [ rU ! rD ] = 14.4% + 20% " 0.6 " (14.4% ! 8%) = 15.2% E WACC = 16.7% " 8% " (1 ! 40%) + 83.3% " 15.2% = 13.5%
Advanced Corporate Finance, Vasil Revishvili, vrevishvili@cu.edu.ge
!#%$
!#&$
!#'$
!%)$
!%!$
Practical issues: For rf use the maturity matched generally long dated government yield minus liquidity premium, for #E use adjusted estimate, for (rm-rf) use market risk premium of the market which represents investment opportunities for the investors. Do everything in one currency
!%*$
D E PS WACC = rD (1 ! t ) + rE + rPS D + E + PS D + E + PS D + E + PS
This is the example when other source is Preferred Stock (PS). The cost of PS might be estimated as the required yield on the preferred securities
!%+$
Multiple Divisions?
If firms have multiple business lines, then their overall cost of capital is determined by weighted average risk of the divisions
Value Div1 Div1 Value Div 2 Div 2 Value DivN DivN ru = ru + ru + ... + ru FirmValue FirmValue FirmValue
Ideal Measure for Value is the market value of assets (i.e. present values of cash flows) However, because of difficulty to measure, sometimes, in practice, they use (i) Revenue Weights; (ii) Profit Weights; or (iii) Book Value of Assets Weights. Last is the best because we can adjust for industry market-tobook ratio.
Advanced Corporate Finance, Vasil Revishvili, vrevishvili@cu.edu.ge
!%"$
D(1 ! t ) rE = rU + [ rU ! rD ] E
3) Compute the WACC (future capital structure and cost of debt)
!%($