CHAPTER III DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Table No.1
3.1 Age of the employees Sl no Age No of weight Weighted Average 3 2 1 33 36 21 90 1.8 Total

respondents 1 2 3 Below 25 25- 35 Above 35 Total 11 18 21 50

Chart No 1

Age Group

23% 37%

40%

Below 25

25-35

Above 35

INTERPRETATION: From the above Table 1 and Chart 1 it is clear that employees are selected at random and almost majority of employees of the company falls between the age group of 25-35

Table No : 2 Gender of the employees Sl No Gender Number respondents 1 2 3 Female Male Total 20 30 50 70 30 100 of percentage

Chart No 2

Gender

30%

70%

male

female

INTERPRETATION From the table and chart we can interpret that 70 percent of the workers of KAMCO are male and only 30 percent is female

Table No 3

3.3 Qualification of the employees Sl No 1 2 3 4 5 Qualification No of respondents Below SSLC 5 SSLC 10 Pre degree 20 Degree 15 Total 50 weight 4 3 2 1 Rating 20 30 40 15 105 Weighted Average

2.1

Chart no 3 Qualification
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 below SSLC SSLC no of respondents predegree weight Ratings Degree

Interpretation From the obtained data it is clear that the majority of the workers are having the qualification of predegree Table No 4
3.4 satisfaction level of salaries SL.NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 1 15 NO.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 22 110 13 7 4 4 50 52 21 8 4 195 3.9

CHART 4
250 200 150 100 50 0 WEIGHT NO.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE

INTERPRETATION: From the above table, it is clear that majority of workers are highly satisfied with the salaries provided by the company.

Table No 5 3.5 Employee transport facilities Sl no 1 2 3 4 Chart No 5 opinion satisfied neutral dissatisfied total No of respondents 40 7 3 50 weight 3 2 1 Rating 120 14 3 137 Weighted Average

2.74

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 satisfied neutral no of respondents weight Rating dissatisfied

Interpretation From the given data we can interpret that the employees are satisfied with the transportation facilities of the company as the company is in reachable place. Transportation is an important factor for the job satisfaction.

Table No 6 3.5 Infrastructure facility No 1 2 3 4 Chart No 6 opinion good neutral poor total No of respondents 29 10 11 50 weight 3 2 1 Rating 87 20 11 118 Weighted Average

2.36

Infrastructure Facility
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Good neutral No.of Respondents weight Rating Poor

Interpretation From the table no 5 and chart no 5 it can be interpreted that the companys infrastructure facility is good enough that most of the workers are satisfied with it.

Table No 7 3.7 Safety measures provided by the company Sl no 1 2 3 4 Chart No 7 opinion good satisfied poor total No of respondents 24 20 6 50 weight 3 2 1 Rating 72 40 6 118 Weighted average

2.36

Safety Measures
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Good Satisfied no of respondents weight Series 3 poor

Interpretation From the obtained data we can interpret that the employees feel satisfied with the safety measures provided by the company

Table No 8 3.8 Working hours of the employees

Sl no 1 2 3 4 5

Opinion strongly Agree Agree neutral disagree Strongly

No of weight respondents 10 5 8 8 7 17 4 3 2 1

Rating 50 32 24 14 17

Weighted Average

disagree total Chart No 8

50

137

2.47

Working Hours
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral weight Disagree Rating Strongly Disagree

No of respondents

Interpretation
It is clear from the table 7 and chart 7 that workers are not comfortable with the working hours of the company as they feels that the working hours are more. The working hour is a major factor that affects the satisfaction level of employees

TABLE NO 9.
3.9: SATISFACTION LEVEL OF OVERTIME BENEFITS SL.NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 NO.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 12 60 18 8 6 72 24 12

5.

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL

1 15

6 50

6 174 3.48

CHART 9
200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

WEIGHT NO.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE

INTERPRETATION: From the above table, it is clear that majority of workers are satisfied with the overtime benefits provided by the company. Some of them are highly satisfied with overtime benefits provided by the company.

TABLE 10 3.10 Relationship with other employees

SL.NO. 1. 2. 3. 4.

OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED

WEIGHT 5 4 3 2

NO.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 12 60 18 10 5 72 30 10

5.

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL

1 15

5 50

5 177 3.54

CHART 10
200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

WEIGHT NO.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE

INTERPRETATION: From the above table, it is clear that majority of workers are satisfied with the relationship with other employees of the company. Some of them are highly satisfied and some are having fair decision about relationship with other employees of the company. Performance of employees mainly depends up on relationship with other employees. It will leads to improve the performance of employees and it will create a team spirit and co-operation

TABLE 11
3.11: Satisfaction level of refreshment SL.NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 1 NO.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 25 125 15 5 5 0 60 15 10 0

TOTAL

15

50

210

4.20

CHART 11
250 200 150 100 50 0 WEIGHT NO.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE

INTERPRETATION: Refreshment and relaxation is necessary for employees in doing their work. It will leads to improve the performance and efficiency of workers From the above table, it is clear that majority of workers are highly satisfied with the refreshments provided by the company. Some of them are satisfied and some are having fair decision about refreshments provided by the company.

TABLE 12 3.12 Satisfaction with the companies grievance handling method

SL.NO 1.

GRIEVANCE HANDLING HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL

NO.OF RATING WEIGHTED RESPONDENTS WEIGHT AVERAGE 50 10 5 4 132 15

2. 3.

33 5 3

4 4. 5. DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL CHART 12 2 0 2 0 1 201 50 4

Grevience Handling
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 highly satisfied satisfied neutral weight dissatisfied Rating highly dissatisfied

no of respondents

INTERPRETATION From the given table we can interpret that some of the employees seems to be dissatisfied with the grievance handling process of the company. If the employees feels the authorities are not giving much attention to their problems there will job dissatisfaction

TABLE 13

3.13 Satisfaction level of work participation of the superiors with employees

SL.NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 1 15 NO.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 22 110 13 7 4 4 50 52 21 8 4 195 3.9

SOURCE: SURVEY DATA CHART NO 13

250 200 150 100 50 0 WEIGHT NO.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE

INTERPRETATION: From the above table, it is clear that majority of workers are highly satisfied with the assistance and participation of their superiors or other workers, to the work assigned to them.

TABLE NO 14
3.14 Satisfaction with the training provided

OPINION SL.NO HIGHLY

NO.OF RATING TOTAL RESPONDENTS WEIGHT 20

1.

SATISFIED

5 40

2. 3.

SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED

10 16 16

4 48 3 32 2 4 1 144 3 100

4. 5. HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL

4 50

CHART NO 14 Training programme

50 40 30 20 10 0 highly satisfied satisfied neutral weight dissatisfied Rating highly dissatisfied

no of respondents

Interpretation
From the obtained chat and table we can interpret that some of the employees are satisfied with the training provided while few others are not satisfied with the training.

TABLE NO 15 3.15 satisfaction with the job advancement opportunities

OPINION SL.NO 1. HIGHLY SATISFIED NO.OF RESPONDENTS 4 RATING WEIGHT 20 5 TOTAL

SATISFIED 2. NEUTRAL 3. DISSATISFIED 4. 5. HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL 4 4 50 2 10 3 28 4

112 30 8 4 1 174 100 3

CHART NO 15

Job enhancement
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Highly satisfied satisfied neutral weight dissatisfied Rating highly dissatisfied

no of respondents

Interpretation
From the given table we can interpret that majority of the employees are satisfied with the job advancement opportunities provided to them by the company.

TABLE 16 3.16 Satisfaction with reward and recognitions provided

OPINION SL.NO NO.OF RESPONDENTS 12 WEIGHT 5 RATING 60 TOTAL

1.

HIGHLY SATISFIED 18 4 3 2 1 72 24 12 6 SATISFIED 8 NEUTRAL 6 DISSATISFIED 6 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 174 TOTAL 50 3

2. 3. 4. 5.

CHART NO 16 Rewards and recognition

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NO OF RESPONDENTS NEUTRAL WEIGHT RATING DISSATISFIED TOTAL HIISFIEDGHLY DISSATISFIED

Interpretation
From the table it is clear that the employees are neutrally satisfied with the rewards and recognitions provided. Some of the employees are highly satisfied with the rewards and recognitions while some feels dissatisfied with it.