Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
No doubt it is the courts, guided by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, that
will ultimately adjudicate the issue of what limits, if any, can be imposed on
religious expression in a secular society that also claims to be democratic.
But in the meantime, practical folk and elected officials accountable to them
would do well to contemplate the extent of the wrecking ball operations that
would be required if Canada were to seriously attempt to remove every
vestige of its spiritual heritage – in particular its Judeo-Christian heritage –
from the public square.
Starting in Quebec, for example, one presumably would have to take the
wrecking ball to all the publicly visible buildings and institutions with a
religious history or vocation. More than 4,000 of these were identified as
worthy of preservation by a committee of the Quebec National Assembly in
its 2006 report Believing in Quebec's Religious Heritage.
Moving to Ottawa, the first target for the wrecking ball would obviously be
the Peace Tower, the most prominent feature of our Parliament buildings. If
displaying religious material on public property at the centre of the universe
is “inappropriate” because it goes against Toronto's “general policy of
inclusiveness,” surely it would be utterly intolerable to allow the Peace Tower
with its prominent scriptural inscriptions to remain standing.
And while we are in the nation's capital, would it not also be logical to take
the axe to the Canadian coat of arms, the national anthem and the
Constitution itself?
O Canada would clearly have to go since the original French version contains
unseemly references to “carrying the cross” and a “valour steeped in faith,”
while the third verse of the original English version is, from start to finish, an
unapologetic prayer to the “Ruler Supreme.”
And the Charter could not escape unscathed since its preamble
acknowledges the supremacy of God, while its opening clauses seek to
guarantee the freedoms of religion and expression, which the wielders of the
wrecking ball seek to restrict.
Time and space permit only a small sampling of the other obvious targets if
the object were to remove every visible vestige of religious belief from the
public square in our country. These would include many of the secular
universities of Atlantic and Central Canada, most of which had their roots in
religious institutions and still bear many of the hallmarks of that heritage.
Trinity College at the University of Toronto, for example, would have to go
since the Trinity referred to is the sacred Trinity, not the Three Amigos, as
would much of the property of my alma mater, the University of Alberta,
since it bears the inscription Quaecumque vera (“Whatsoever things are
true”) taken from the writings of the Apostle Paul. And further west, the axe
would need to be taken to all the totem poles and publicly displayed religious
artifacts so revered by B.C. aboriginals.
It is not only ridiculous, but also dangerous for any nation to try to expunge
the visible evidences of its own cultural heritage, even if some of those
evidences serve simply to remind us of beliefs and practices we have chosen
to refine, reform, or replace.