Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
American Government Bailout RBSs American Operation. Bank of Scotland Taken Over by Halifax - Never a Merger.
Much was talked about the banking crises and how an Independent Scotland would have coped with the problems of the two large banks that are registered as headquartered in Scotland, the Royal Bank of Scotland and HBOS. Why they never mention Lloyds TSB which is also registered in Scotland I do not know. However, it is the country in which the saver lives that guarantees that amount not the country where the bank is headquartered. For instance, the US Government gave bailout money to the Royal Bank of Scotland for their US operation. The governments decided to bailout the banks because they guarantee the money of every single savers up to, at that time, 50,000 for each different banking group. Therefore an Independent Scottish Government would only have responsibility for savers who were citizens of an Independent Scotland whichever bank operating in Scotland they had an account with.
Scotlands Accounts
The following figures are taken from Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland 2011 - 2012 (scotland.gov.uk/gers) issued March 2013 Scottish National Accounts Project 2011 - 2012 (scotland.gov.uk/snap) issued March 2013 Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2012 (hm-treasury.gov.uk) issued June 2013 H.M. Revenue & Customs (uktradeinfo.com) issued March 2013
All four nations in the UK are running at a deficit. Scotland alone is running at a surplus before the interest payments for the UK deficit is included.
Foreword You will see from the following pages, Scotland is in a better financial position than the UK, according to the latest figures - 2011/12. This is not only the case for this year, it is also the case for last year and the year before, in fact it has been the case for each and every one of the last 30 years. Yet for each and every one of those 30 years we have been told Scotland is subsidised, when the facts tell us the exact opposite is true. Unfortunately for those that are put off by a mass of figures, they are the only way to demonstrate that an Independent Scotland would be in a far better position economically than we are as part of the UK.
Government Subsidies
which can be achieved both directly and indirectly
This issue of Scotlands Accounts was delayed awaiting the UK Treasury - Public Sector Statistical Analysis (PESA) issued 17 July 2013 which carries the most up to date public expenditure figures broken down by Country or English Region. The idea was to demonstrate that London received a higher direct subsidy than Scotland, as had been the case in previous year only to find that this years showed London as receiving a lower direct subsidy in 2011-12 than Scotland. Not only that, but the figures from previous years had been altered to also show London receiving a lower subsidy than Scotland. You may well wonder how accounts that are more than two years old can suddenly change so drastically or in the case of Defence spending disappear altogether? Public Expenditure per head of population Financial Year PESA % of UK issued 2012 Average
10,146 9,945 10,198 10,165 116% 113% 115% 114%
% of UK Average
114% 114% 112% 114%
2009 - 10
Financial Year
2010 - 11
Direct subsidy - higher than average public spending on such things as Social Protection (Pensions and Benefits), Health and Education etc. London weighting is also a subsidy, which pays everyone on the public payroll in that city higher wages (table above). Indirect Subsidy - such as Defence spending which includes the placing of an order for a ship or an aircraft, the siting of an army camp or a naval base etc. All these things bring direct and indirect financial benefits to an area. For some reason the UK Government stopped producing country and regional breakdowns of Defence spending in 2007/8.
The Vote for an Independent Scotland is a Vote of the Heart and the Head
While for some of us the vote for an Independent Scotland is a vote of the heart, we fully understand that others have to satisfy themselves that their future will be financially secure if they vote YES. This is understandable. We have responsibilities, bills to pay. It is only right that people should be concerned about their economic future if they vote for an Independent Scotland. Well plough your way through these figures and your heart and your head will be saying YES to Independence.
Indirect subsidy (Defence Spending per head of population 2007- 08) Defence Spending Spending (per head) % UK average London & South England Nth Ireland Scotland Wales 664 450 371 300 130 158% 107% 88% 71% 31%
Other Indirect Subsidy - such as the siting of Civil Service jobs (particular the senior levels) which tend be to disproportionately based in London and brings a considerable financial benefit to that city. These are much harder to obtain.
1,477 750 4,072 3,281 2,558 893 335 130 987 2,648 1,237 1,719 11,066 1,608 7,702 21,656 2,338
2.6% 1.3% 7.2% 5.8% 4.5% 1.6% 0.6% 0.2% 1.7% 4.7% 2.2% 3.0% 19.5% 2.8% 13.5% 38.1% 4.1%
12,699 8,952 48,613 39,119 32,319 3,320 3,583 1,959 5,839 20,205 11,218 10,406 121,286 13,198 91,650 242,291 26,945
2.2% 1.6% 8.5% 6.8% 5.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.3% 1.0% 3.5% 2.0% 1.8% 21.2% 2.3% 16.0% 42.3% 8.7%
113.3%
693,602 572,636
121.1%
13%
120,966
21%
After paying 8.4% of the interest due on the UK National Debt and an above average spend on Capital projects Scotlands deficit is 13% of income, 8% lower than the UK.
Scotland
(millions) including Geographical share of North Sea Oil
2006-07 49,776 45,200 1,595 2,981 2,428 553 2007-08 51,927 48,030 1,684 2,213 2,666 -453 2008-09 55,254 49,791 1,748 3,715 2,681 1,034 2009-10 47,573 52,775 1,863 -7,035 2,614 -9,649 2010-11 52,330 54,245 1,912 -3,827 3,857 -7,684 2011-12 56,871 54,191 2,006 Total % of UK
UK
(millions) including Geographical share of North Sea Oil
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 513,338 572,468 19,345 -79,237 2010-11 551,663 587,606 20,310 -56,534 2011-12 572,636 595,186 21,134 Total
519,184 548,899 532,730 478,468 505,319 534,068 16,988 23,728 17,683 23,966 18,649 -19,460
-43,684 -151,221
48,613 -92,297 -369,070
28,749 -5,021
31,596 -7,630
31,830 -51,290
31,091
45,970
Deficit(-) / Surplus(+)
-110,328 -102,504
Capital Budget
Expenditure Less Capital Consumption Net Investment Deficit
Scotland
(millions) including Geographical share of North Sea Oil
2006-07 5,044 -1,595 3,449 -2,896 2007-08 5,229 -1,684 3,545 -3,998 2008-09 6,481 -1,748 4,733 2009-10 6,660 -1,833 4,827 2010-11 5,928 -1,912 4,416 2011-12 6,193 -2,006 4,187 24,757 11.5% 7.6% Total % of UK
Capital Budget
Expenditure Less Capital Consumption Net Investment Deficit
UK
(millions) including Geographical share of North Sea Oil
2006-07 40,888 -16,988 23,900 -28,921 2007-08 46,772 -17,683 29,089 -36,719 2008-09 64,898 -18,649 46,249 2009-10 67,944 -19,350 48,594 2010-11 58,778 -20,315 38,463 -140,967 2011-12 49,800 -21,134 28,666 -120,963 214,961 -584,031 Total
-7,585 -44,354
-97,539 -158,922
Balance of Trade
Export
( millions)
One very important indicator when assessing the financial well being of Scotland is to look at the balance of trade with other countries. It is necessary to import goods required from other countries but you have to balance that with exporting goods too
Surplus / Deficit (-) - 104,645 + 5,427 + 5,139 + 201 - 5,325 Oil and Erractics are not allocated to any one country
Unallocated - where goods are not or cannot be allocated to any one country. The two unallocated budgets here are Erractics (ships, aircraft, precious stones and silver) and North Sea Oil. One explanation for the unallocated region is where Oil is processed on rigs in the North Sea and dispatched directly to other countries without entering the UK.
Unfortunately a similar regional breakdown cannot be obtained for Services which redress the deficit in UK trade in Goods to some extent. The following figures for Trade in Goods differs slightly from those above although they were obtained from the same source. Export
( millions)
Import
( million)
299,073 193,933
399,303 117,294
Defence Spending
B.A.E. Systems - Clyde, better known to us as Yarrows and Govan mainly specialise in building naval ships for the British Navy and a number of other national fleets. Over the last few years they have been completing one Type 45 Destroyer each year.
Type 23 Frigate - hull costs around 130 million (excluding the cost of weapons systems)
Displacement 4,900 Tonnes, 133M (436ft), Beam16.1M
Type 45 Destroyer - costs around 600 million (excluding cost of Sea Viper anti aircraft missile system)
Displacement 8,000 Tonnes, 152M (500ft), Beam 21.2M While the accounts for 2011/12 show a per capita share of 8.4% allocated to Defence spending for Scotland, less than two-thirds of that is actually spent here. Also in reality it should be the same as Scotlands contribution to the British economy i.e. 9.9%.
24.1%
26.4%
of UKs Income
Total Defence Budget = 39.1 billion (including procurement) Scotlands input to the Defence Budget = 3.9 billion (9.9%)
The Procurement Budget = 13.9 billion (35%) Scotlands input to the Procurement Budget = 1.33 billion (9.9%) Scotlands contribution to the Department of Defence procurement in the financial year 2011/12 is the equivalent to the following:Type 23 Frigate
14.0%
15.9%
of UKs Income
of Scotlands Income
Type 45 Destroyer
Type 45 Destroyer
Public Sector Pensions Schemes - are either administered or regulated by the Scottish Public Pension Agency on behalf of the Scottish Government. This covers NHS, Teachers, Police, Firefighters, Local and National Government all paid from funds administered in Scotland at the present time.