0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
15 visualizzazioni1 pagina
STARtechnique for treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO) has limited data on safety. Some concerns arise for major risk of stent thrombosis (ST) at mid-term follow-up. At 1. Years there was no significant difference in terms of cardiac survival rates (97.3% vs. 97.8% STAR and CA-CTO, respectively, Log-rank p=0.778)
STARtechnique for treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO) has limited data on safety. Some concerns arise for major risk of stent thrombosis (ST) at mid-term follow-up. At 1. Years there was no significant difference in terms of cardiac survival rates (97.3% vs. 97.8% STAR and CA-CTO, respectively, Log-rank p=0.778)
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
STARtechnique for treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO) has limited data on safety. Some concerns arise for major risk of stent thrombosis (ST) at mid-term follow-up. At 1. Years there was no significant difference in terms of cardiac survival rates (97.3% vs. 97.8% STAR and CA-CTO, respectively, Log-rank p=0.778)
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Aim: There are limited data on safety of the STAR-
technique for treatment of chronic total occlusions
(CTO) and some concerns arise for major risk of stent thrombosis (ST). Aim of the study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes after successful recanalization with STAR compared to conventional- anterograde CTO recanalization (CA-CTO). Methods and Results: Between June 2005 and June 2007, a total of 356 patients with successful angiographic recanalization of at least one CTO lesion were consecutively registered, including 75 (21.1%) who underwent STAR and 281 (78.9%) who underwent CA-CTO recanalization. All patients were followed for more than 1.5 years (median 2 years) for occurrence of cardiac events. Mid-term survival rates were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. Compared to CA-CTO pts, the following clinical and angiographic characteristics were significantly more frequent in STAR patients: hypercholesterolemia (84% vs. 67%, p=0.004), previous CABG (41.3% vs. 15.7%,p<0.0001), 3-vessels disease, (62.7% vs. 47%, p=0.019), RCA-CTO (62.7% vs. 41.6, p=0.002). No significant differences were found in the use of DES (89.2% vs. 93.5%). Average follow-up periods were 796352 and 775374 days for STAR and CA-CTO patients, respectively. At 1.5 years there was no significant difference in terms of cardiac survival rates (97.3% vs. 97.8% STAR and CA-CTO, respectively, Log-rank p=0.778) and of probable and definite ST rates (0% vs. 1.1% STAR and CA-CTO, respectively, p=0.803). Target-lesion- revascularization (TLR) free survival rate in the STAR group was significantly higher than CA-CTO (70.6% vs. 86.8%, p=0.005). Conclusions: At mid-term follow-up the STAR technique was not inferior to CA-CTO in terms of cardiac death and ST rates. Previous data of more incidence of TLR with STAR were confirmed. Table 1 Baseline clinical and lesions characteristics Guided-STAR pts (n=75) CA-CTO pts (n=281) p value Age, yrs 61.229.1 62.269.3 .392 Male gender 69 (93.2) 239 (85.1) .064 Current smoker 9 (12.2) 44 (15.7) .453 Hypercholesterolemia 62 (84) 189 (67) .005 Hypertension 59 (79.7) 201 (71.5) .156 Diabetes mellitus 24 (32.4) 81 (28.8) .545 IDDM 5 (6.8) 26 (9.3) .499 Prior myocardial infarction 39 (52.7) 141 (50.2) .699 Prior PCI 42 (56.8) 135 (48) .182 Prior CABG 31 (41.3) 44 (15.7) .000 Chronic kidney disease * 2 (2.7%) 14(5) .400 Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 53.168.5 52.210 .451 Three-vessel disease 47 (62.7) 132 (47) .011 Target Vessel LAD 4 (5.4) 98 (34.9) .000 LCX-OM 23 (31.3) 66 (23.5) .180 RCA 47 (63.5) 117 (41.6) .001 In-stent restenosis 3 (4.1) 40 (14.2) .017 Prior CTO attempt 21 (28.4) 43 (15.3) .009 Stents Mean stent length, mm (mean SD) 68.1533.6 54.0529.4 .000 Only BMS, N (%) 7 (9.6%) 18 (6.5) .366 Only DES, N (%) 66 (89.2) 258 (93.5) .366 Complete revascularization 34 (45.9) 150 (53.4) .255 Duration of DAT, days DAT <6 months 4 (5.4) 20 (7.1) .597 DAT 6 months 6 (8.2) 16 (5.7) .448 DAT > 6 months 64 (86.4) 245 (87.2) .583 DAT days, mean 449.263 43756 .803 Table 2 Major Adverse Cardiac Events at long term follow-up Guided-STAR pts CA-CTO pts p value *Clinical follow-up, N (%) 73 (97.3%) 258 (91.8%) - Days follow-up, meanSD (median) 796352 (779) 775374 (801) .913 Death 3 (4.1%) 9 (3.5%) .802 Cardiac death 2 (2.7%) 7 (2.7%) .990 Acute MI 2 (2.7%) 8 (3.1%) .874 CABG 2 (2.7%) 1 (0.4%) .061 TVR 35 (47.9%) 54 (20.9%) .000 TLR 22 (30.1%) 41 (15.9%) .006 TLR clinically-driven 13 (17.8%) 21 (8.1%) .016 MACE 39 (53.4%) 62 (24%) .000 Stent thrombosis 2 (2.7%) 4 (1.4%) .448 Definite 0 3 (1.2%) .355 Probable 0 0 - Angiographic follow-up, N (%) 63 (85.1%) 201 (78%) - Time to angiographic follow-up in days, meanSD (median) 310120 (196) 29888 (189) .778 Restenosis 34 (54%) 61 (30%) .000 TLR success 25/27 (92.6%) 50/55 (91%) .738 Clinical outcome of the Subintimal-Tracking and Re-entry (STAR) technique compared to anterograde CTO recanalization Cosmo Godino, Alfonso Ielasi, Raffaele Lacquaniti, Azeem Latib, Rasha Al-Lamee, Marco Mussardo, Giorgio Bassanelli, Alaide Chieffo, Mauro Carlino, Antonio Colombo. San Raffaele Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery Versus Surgery Alone For Oesophageal or Junctional Cancer (CROSS) Long-Term Results of A Randomised Controlled Trial