Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
RST01B Hoc
Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:09 PM RST01 Hoc; RST07 Hoc RSTO1B Hoc FW: FW: Instrumentation Data and Background - Draft for Review ATT00002.jpg; Timeline and Data 3-22-11.xls; plant instrumentation -r4.docx
From: Versluis, Rob [mailto:ROB.VERSLUIS@nuclear.energy.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:50 AM To: RSTO1B Hoc Subject: FW: FW: Instrumentation Data and Background - Draft for Review
From: McCaughey, Bill Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:46 AM To: DL-NERT-All; DL-NITsolutions Subject: FW: FW: Instrumentation Data and Background - Draft for Review Timeline and plant instrumentation trends being compiled for the first time. Note caveats on the data. From: Joy L Rempe [mailto:Joy.Rempe@inl.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 9:43 AM To: Schwab, Patrick Cc: Larzelere, Alex; McCaughey, Bill; gehinjc@ornl.gov; McFarlane, Harold; Kelly, John E (NE); Sorenson, Ken B; Schwab, Patrick; Golub, Sal; Bari, Robert A Subject: Re: FW: Instrumentation Data and Background - Draft for Review
Hi, I sent Pat a quick note on my blackberry, but just so there's no confusion. It appears that all of the spent fuel pool data come from the same source. However, IAEA explicitly report 3 different times for obtaining 84 C values (others, such as JAIF only report the value without a time at later dates, indicating that it was measured on 3/14). It appears that they must go and read the data in the building (see WORD document). We also wondered about this information (e.g., why did IAEA report more details than we saw from other sources). Yesterday, I checked their website, and it still had three distinct time (so we agreed to leave the three data points). Today, the IAEA has updated their website, and they now only report 1 time. We will update the plots. As noted in the spreadsheet, we also noted other discrepancies in the reports that we received (e.g., some references reported pressures as abs, others reported gauge, and others just reported a pressure). We cross-compared and tried to understand their logic. The vessel temperatures reported by Yamagata-san are the first that I've seen. We will start to include them (and assume that they mean C, but it might be good to ask.. the text we messed up). Thanks, Joy
DK 635 of 1892
Pit
Joy Rempe Idaho National Laboratory Phone: (208) 525-2897 - Cell: (208) 520-3708 - Fax: (208) 526-2930' Email: Joy.Rempe@inl.gov
To "Kelly, John E (NE" <JohnE.Kelly(vnuclear.eneyv.qov>, "Golub, Sal" <sal.Qolub(&nuclear.enerqv.qov>, "Larzelere, Alex" <alex.larzelere(d~nuclear.enerqy.qov> cc "McFarlane, Harold" <harold.mcfadane(,inl..qov>, "McCaughey, Bill" <Bill. McCaugheyv@nuclear.enemv.qov>. "Schwab, Patrick" <Patrick.Schwab(@nuclear.enerov.oov>, '"Joy L Rempe" <Joy.Remoe(W.inl.qov>. "Sorenson, Ken B" <kbsoren(,sandia.gov>, "oehinictornl.oov" <qehinicjornl.qov> Subject FW: Instrumentation Data and Background - Draft for Review
John,
Pat
Original ----Message ----From: Joy L Rempe [mailto:Joy.Rempe@inl.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:52 AM To: Schwab, Patrick Cc: Gehin, Jess C.; Sorenson, Ken B; McFarlane, Harold; Douglas E Burns; spburns@sandia.gov; RobertP.Martin@inl.gov; Kurt L Davis; John.Kelly@netzsch.com; farmer@anl.gov; Finck, Phillip; taiwo@anl.gov; cgrandy@anl.gov; Robert W Youngblood; William C Phoenix; Nam T Dinh; Mark R Cox; Trevor Cook Subject: Instrumentation Data and Background - Draft for Review
Hi,
DK 636 of 1892
Thanks,
Joy
1-s
DK 637 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 638 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 639 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 640 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 641 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 642 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 643 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 644 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 645 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 646 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 647 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 648 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 649 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 650 of 1892
(b)(5)
DK 651 of 1892