Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Jonathan Sterling
11 February 2008
Contents
1 Introduction 2
2 If Ingred calls Johnny, what is the probability they will talk that day? 3
3 The equation, PItJ∪JtI (x), or probability that Johnny and Ingred talk given x,
3.2 On the value of x in PItJ∪JtI (x), given that the probability of talking was 85% . . . 7
4 The Answers 7
List of Figures
1 A tree diagram showing all the different possibilities for the situation. . . . . . . . . 4
1
1 Introduction
There are two people, presumably friends, named Johnny and Ingred. The first problem to solve is,
If Ingred calls Johnny, what is the probability they will talk that day?. This problem will be solved
by the utilisation of a tree diagram, in which the terminal values pointing to them talking to each
other that day are added up. It is to be assumed that the following conditions are in existence:
4. There is a 100% chance that they will each check their messages that day.
5. There is a 60% chance that both/either of them will return a call on the same day whereon
6. There is a maximum of three calls between them; therefore, the longest situation would be
the following:
The second problem is to write an equation for this situation, where x is the probability of returning
the call; this means that the probability of returning the call (60%) is no longer the same, and will
be the input of this new function. The last problem is, using this new function, What would x have
2
2 If Ingred calls Johnny, what is the probability they will talk
that day?
First, a tree diagram showing the possibilities is created. J stands for “Johnny”, I stands for
“Ingred”, c means “called”, a means “answered”, cm means “checked messages”, cb means “called
back” and t means “talked to”. Because of its size, the tree diagram (Figure 1) is located on page
4. The terminal values for the tree diagram are in Table 2 on page 5.
Now, in order to find the probability that Johnny and Ingred talked to each other over the
telephone that day, all one must do is add up all of the terminal values that have checkmarks
attached to them in Table 2 in order to get the probability of the union of “Ingred talked to
Johnny” and “Johnny talked to Ingred” (there really is no difference between the two, but it was
helpful in the visualisation to make a distinction regarding who is doing the calling and answering).
= .5 + .15 + .045 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0
= .5 + 15 + .045
Therefore, the probability that Johnny and Ingred talked to each other that day over the telephone
is 69.5%.
The most important part of doing this is to remember that the development of this function is
exactly the same as the finding of P (ItJ ∪ JtI), except that there is a single variable involved.
Therefore, this should not be difficult. The first step is to create the formula using all the steps
3
IcJ
.5 .5
Ja Ja
1 0
ItJ ItJ
A B 1 0
Jcm Jcm
0 1
ItJ ItJ
O P
.6 .4
JcbI JcbI
0 1
ItJ ItJ
.5 .5 M N
Ia Ia
1 0
JtI JtI
1 0
C D Icm Icm
0 1
.6 .4 JtI JtI
IcbJ IcbJ
K L
0 1
.5 .5
ItJ ItJ
Ja Ja
I J
1 0 0 1
ItJ ItJ ItJ ItJ
E F G H
Figure 1: A tree diagram showing all the different possibilities for the situation.
4
Variable Value Talked?
A .5 × 1 = .5 !
B .5 × 0 = 0 #
C .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 = .15 !
D .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 0 = 0 #
E .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 = .045 !
F .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 0 = 0 #
G .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 0 = 0 !
H .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 = .045 #
I .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 × .4 × 0 = 0 !
J .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 1 × .4 × 1 = .06 #
K .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 0 × 0 = 0 !
L .5 × 1 × .6 × .5 × 0 × 1 = 0 #
M .5 × 1 × .4 × 0 = 0 !
N .5 × 1 × .4 × 1 = .2 #
O .5 × 0 × 0 = 0 !
P .5 × 0 × 1 = 0 #
Figure 2: The terminal values of the tree diagram in Figure 1
in 2, while replacing the values for probability of returning a call with x, and probability of not
PItJ∪JtI (x) = PA (x) + PC (x) + PE (x) + PG (x) + PI (x) + PK (x) + PM (X) + PO (x)
+(.5 × 1 × x × .5 × 1 × x × .5 × 0) + [.5 × 1 × x × .5 × 1 × (1 − x) × 0]
= .5 + .25x + .125x2 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0
= .5 + .25x + .125x2
5
This function can be verified by merely plugging the original probability of a returned call, .6,
hereinto:
= .125(.36) + .15 + .5
= .045 + .15 + .5
= .695
Because the answers come out to be the same, there is no doubt that this is the correct formula.
A graph for the function is shown in Figure 3. The domain is 0 ≤ x ≥ 1, because the probability
of returning the call cannot be less than zero, or more than one, yet it can be either one of them. If
the probability of returning a call is zero, then there is a 50% chance of Johnny and Ingred talking
that day (in the case that Johnny picks up the phone on the first try); if there is a 100% probability
of calls being returned, there is an 87.5% chance of Johnny and Ingred talking that day.
6
3.2 On the value of x in PItJ∪JtI (x), given that the probability of talking was
85%
p
−(.25) ± (.25)2 − 4 × .125 × (−.35)
x=
2(.125)
√
−.25 ± .0625 + .175
=
√.25
−.25 ± .2375
=
.25√
−.25 .2375
= ±
.25 √ .25
.2375
x = −1 ±
.25
x ≈ 0.949358869
Because we can’t have a negative value for x, that is the only answer.
4 The Answers
The probability of the union of “Ingred talked to Johnny” and “Johnny talked to Ingred” is 0.695,
or 6.95%.
7
4.2 PItJ∪JtI (x)
The probability of the union of “Ingred talked to Johnny” and “Johnny talked to Ingred”, where