Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Maceda vs. ERB Digest

    Caricato da

    GerardPeterMariano
    97 visualizzazioni2 pagine
    Three oil companies applied to the Energy Regulatory Board (ERB) for permission to increase wholesale fuel prices provisionally pending further proceedings. The ERB granted the applicants a provisional average increase of P1.00 per liter. Senator Ernesto Maceda challenged the order, arguing it was issued without proper notice and hearing. However, Section 9 of Executive Order 123 allows the ERB to grant provisional relief without a prior hearing, subject to immediately scheduling a hearing within 30 days. While a hearing is required under the executive order, it does not preclude the ERB from ordering a provisional increase ex parte, as it did here, subject to its final decision after the hearing.

    Descrizione originale:

    Maceda vs ERB digest

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formati disponibili

    DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    Three oil companies applied to the Energy Regulatory Board (ERB) for permission to increase wholesale fuel prices provisionally pending further proceedings. The ERB granted the applicants a provisional average increase of P1.00 per liter. Senator Ernesto Maceda challenged the order, arguing it was issued without proper notice and hearing. However, Section 9 of Executive Order 123 allows the ERB to grant provisional relief without a prior hearing, subject to immediately scheduling a hearing within 30 days. While a hearing is required under the executive order, it does not preclude the ERB from ordering a provisional increase ex parte, as it did here, subject to its final decision after the hearing.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Scarica in formato DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    97 visualizzazioni2 pagine

    Maceda vs. ERB Digest

    Caricato da

    GerardPeterMariano
    Three oil companies applied to the Energy Regulatory Board (ERB) for permission to increase wholesale fuel prices provisionally pending further proceedings. The ERB granted the applicants a provisional average increase of P1.00 per liter. Senator Ernesto Maceda challenged the order, arguing it was issued without proper notice and hearing. However, Section 9 of Executive Order 123 allows the ERB to grant provisional relief without a prior hearing, subject to immediately scheduling a hearing within 30 days. While a hearing is required under the executive order, it does not preclude the ERB from ordering a provisional increase ex parte, as it did here, subject to its final decision after the hearing.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Scarica in formato DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 2

    SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, petitioner, vs.

    ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB); FACTS n September 10, 1990, Caltex (Philippines), Inc., Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation, and Petron Corporation proffered separate applications with the oard for per!ission to in"re#se t$e %$o&es#&e poste' pri"es o( petro&e)! pro')"ts and meanwhile, for provision#& #)t$orit* to in"re#se te!por#ri&* s)"$ %$o&es#&e poste' pri"es pen'in+ ()rt$er pro"ee'in+s. !n September "1,1990, the Bo#r', in # ,oint (on t$ree #pp&i"#tions) Or'er +r#nte' provision#& re&ie( authorin# said applicants a wei#hted a$era#e pro$isional increase of !%& P&S! '%( )!*+,-+.! C&%+'/!S (P1.0") per liter in the wholesale posted prices of their $arious petroleum products enumerated below, refined and1or mar2eted b3 them locall3. T$e petitioners s)-!it t$#t t$e #-ove Or'er $#' -een iss)e' %it$ +r#ve #-)se o( 'is"retion, t#nt#!o)nt to &#". o( ,)ris'i"tion, and correctible b3 certiorari. T$e petitioner, Sen#tor Ernesto M#"e'#, #&so s)-!its t$#t t$e s#!e %#s iss)e' %it$o)t proper noti"e #n' $e#rin+ in vio&#tion o( Se"tion /, p#r#+r#p$ (e), o( E0e")tive Or'er No. 123; t$#t t$e Bo#r', in 'e"reein+ #n in"re#se, $#' "re#te' # ne% so)r"e (or t$e Oi& 4ri"e St#-i&i5#tion F)n' (O4SF), or ot$er%ise t$#t it $#' &evie' # t#06, # po%er veste' in t$e &e+is&#t)re, and1or that it had 4re-collected4, b3 an act of taxation, ad $alorem taxes on oil which *epublic 'ct %o. 5956 had abolished. 7SSUE .!% the act of the &* in authori7in# the pro$isional increase without hearin# is in$alid. 8ELD %o. Senator 8aceda and 'tt3. 9o7ano, in :uestionin# the lac2 of a hearin#, ha$e o$erloo2ed the pro$isions of Se"tion 9 o( E0e")tive Or'er No. 123, which we :uote; :SECT7ON 9. A)t$orit* to Gr#nt 4rovision#& Re&ie(.;T$e Bo#r' !#*, )pon t$e (i&in+ o( #n #pp&i"#tion, petition or "o!p&#int or #t #n* st#+e t$ere#(ter #n' %it$o)t prior $e#rin+, on t$e -#sis o( s)pportin+ p#pers ')&* veri(ie' or #)t$enti"#te', +r#nt provision#& re&ie( on !otion o( # p#rt* in t$e "#se or on its o%n initi#tive, %it$o)t pre,)'i"e to # (in#& 'e"ision #(ter $e#rin+, s$o)&' t$e Bo#r' (in' t$#t t$e p&e#'in+s, to+et$er %it$ s)"$ #((i'#vits, 'o")!ents #n' ot$er evi'en"e %$i"$ !#* -e s)-!itte' in s)pport o( t$e !otion, s)-st#nti#&&* s)pport t$e provision#& or'er 4rovi'e', T$#t t$e Bo#r' s$#&& i!!e'i#te&* s"$e')&e #n' "on')"t # $e#rin+ t$ereon %it$in t$irt* (/<) '#*s t$ere#(ter, )pon p)-&i"#tion #n' noti"e to #&& #((e"te' p#rties. As t$e Or'er itse&( in'i"#tes, t$e #)t$orit* (or provision#& in"re#se (#&&s %it$in t$e #-ove provision.

    .hat must be stressed is that while under &xecuti$e !rder %o. 1<", a hearin# is indispensable, it 'oes not pre"&)'e t$e Bo#r' (ro! or'erin+, e0 p#rte, # provision#& in"re#se, #s it 'i' $ere, sub=ect to its final disposition of whether or not; (1) to ma2e it permanent> (") to reduce or increase it further> or (?) to den3 the application. Section ?, para#raph (e) is a2in to a temporar3 restrainin# order or a writ of preliminar3 attachment issued b3 the courts, which are #i$en ex parte, and which are sub=ect to the resolution of the main case.

    Potrebbero piacerti anche