Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Question1: Compare & contrast Teradynes traditional project execution strategy to the
http://mbacase.blogspot.ca/2012/05/project-management-teradyne-jaguar.html 1/4
1/21/2014
Formalized project management tools like Work Breakdown structure, 3-point estimation, Critical Path analysis, Earned value analysis are used Clear visibility and tracking was possible
Test Strategy
Resource
Correct commitment
2/4
http://mbacase.blogspot.ca/2012/05/project-management-teradyne-jaguar.html
1/21/2014
allocation
was provided, but sometimes forced people into commitment which was not possible in real world
Question 2: What impact did the project management tools have on the Jaguar project? Specifically, how did they change behavior? How did they influence performance?
Higher management did not pay enough attention to the data provided for project management tools and they did not get the understanding of the metrics Most of the time in meeting were spend on finding the right tool, right way to report the data rather than think about the product solutions The Teradyne culture of individual contribution was slowing eroding and people started to feel that they are not responsible for the project delivery timelines Hardware system were largely able to keep on track on timelines, but the software development emerged as a problem Software development division were under enormous pressure to keep the timelines The learning required for new software platform like windows NT was affecting the project delivery The software challenge turned out to be a bigger than anticipated. Even though the hardware units were on time due to software delays the push out was delayed by 6 months for Ultra Flex systems
Question 3: What were the unintended consequences of using the project management tools? What lessons should Teradyne take away from the Jaguar project?
Unintended consequences of using the project management tools Some of the metric were not understood by the management teams and they
http://mbacase.blogspot.ca/2012/05/project-management-teradyne-jaguar.html 3/4
1/21/2014
choose to use the metrics which was easier and understandable for them. This did not reflect on the correct project status More development resource were wasted due to the training, tracking and status update meeting Employees and development teams did not feel that it is their responsibility for project delivery and expected higher management to govern. The need to update status and maintain the project management tools created a diversion for the development teams from the real problems Lessons should Teradyne take away from the Jaguar project Value of the project management tools has to be taught to the project manager teams The need to understand and report the most important metric has to be training. Project management maturity assessment to identify strengths and weakness, and areas of improvement in the organizations project management practice The use of project management tools required a cultural change There is a need for continuous monitoring of the project progress Process is not important, but the capable people has to be there to execute these process Information overload should be avoided Project management tools cannot be used for the development stuff where there is lots of uncertainty.
Posted 11th May 2012 by - Neo
0
Add a comment
Comment as:
Google Account
Publish
Preview
http://mbacase.blogspot.ca/2012/05/project-management-teradyne-jaguar.html
4/4