UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Pro se

15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 jwgrenadier@gmail.com 202-368-7178

Plaintiff v. ILIONA GRENADIER HECKMAN

4200 Massachusetts Ave Apt 410 Washington DC 20016-4752 igrenadier@vafamilylaw.com 703-683-9000

Civil Action No. 14 - 162 EMERGENCEY RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER

GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT & KEISLER, PC

649 S. Washington Street Alexandria, VA 22314 703-683-9000

ROBIN/RACHEAL GRENADIER
Tel Aviv Israel Address unkown RLGRENNIE@YAHOO.COM

LORETTA LAX MILLER aka- LEAH LAX akaMUGGY CAT aka- BILLY SULLIVAN Presidential Candidate for 2016 Campaign Headquarters
350 Market Street Highspire, PA 17304 info@LorettaMiller4President.com

CAMPAIGN FOR LORETTA LAX MILLER And all employees/volunteers

350 Market Street Highspire, PA 17304

DEFENDANTS - Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities.

EMERGENCY RECONDIDERATION OF ORDER Jan 31, 2014 5 Request from Plaintiff to be heard by a Judge to explain VERY complicated Situation of Request for Emergency Restraining Order and Injunctions The appearance of Justice is as Important as Justice itself
th

Response to Order and further information ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE and LAW FOR THE NEED OF AN Emergency Motion to be heard by a Judge in the Federal court in the District of Columbia ASAP TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE TO PLAINTIFF. Plaintiff incorporates all information supplied to this court: in the following documents along with attached Exhibits too fit the outline of Guidelines by Judge Walton in his Order, for Jurisdiction and other questions presented to Plaintiff in Memorandum Opinion. Plaintiff again requests to go in front of a Judge to explain a very complicated situation. January 23, 2014 Emergency Restraining Order w/FEC Complaint January 24, 2014 Verifyed Compliant - to be amended January 24, 2014 Request for Emergency restraining Order and Injection with other Evidence January 31, 2014 2nd Request for Emergency Restraining Order and Injunction with Other Evidence February 2, 2014 3rd request for Emergency Restraining Order and Injection with Other Evidence and to go in front of a Judge. February 3, 2014 Motion to be heard by a Judge February 6, 2014 4th Request for EMERGENCY RESTRAINING ORDER and INJUNCTION WITH OTHER EVIDENCE and to be heard by a Judge The appearance of Justice is as Important as Justice itself Plaintiff in the last week sat in on different Judges Court rooms to observe how the Federal Court protocol worked. In Judge Waltons court Plaintiff does not have transcript so is para phrasing what he said to an approx. in age 28 year old crack dealer -- You are no better than a slave master with a whip -- Plaintiff was a bit taken back but, it also showed how important those children this crack dealer was harming was to him. Several times since September of 2007 Plaintiff has said she has less rights then a Slave. This example could also be used on the Judges who have ruled as they have abused their power in their actions against Plaintiff in collusion in Fraud on the Court, perjury, abuse of Plaintiffs religious, United States Constitutional,
2

Virginia State Constitutional, Civil Rights and basic right to Due Process and the right to services in the courts that Plaintiff paid fees for a Breach of Contract. The judges have ruled with Favoritism and Cronyism ignoring their Oaths of Office, Judicial Procedure, and Court Procedure. The Judges have treated Plaintiff no better than as slave master with a whip. In the Memorandum Opinion which Plaintiff is grateful to have she will address the areas of concern by the Judge that Plaintiff may have missed in the documents Plaintiff is well aware a mistake was made in September of 2007 that just as with Nixon the Cover up of this mistake was what brought down his Presidency not necessarily the actions of the mistake itself. 1. Page 2 Paragraph 2 The Plaintiffs submissions are so rambling and disorganized the Court cannot identify a viable claim that can properly be adjudicated in this federal district court. Plaintiff is before this court on an unequal footing, Plaintiff has tried and failed to be able to get legal representation. Plaintiffs fundamental right to Due Process the basic Freedoms that our country stands for. The right to due process without Fraud from Lawyers, Judges, Judicial, Elected officials is a primary component of Freedom. The right to a Fair Trial Due Process is the basic Constitution right that has been the source of the light of freedom that our Country has given the World. This basic Liberty is what our flag stand for and here is where the standard of Liberty is set for the rest of the World. When reviewing a pro-se pleading, it is prudent to follow the federal practice of liberally construing the allegations set out in the pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes of action. See, e.g. Harrison v. U.S. Postal Services 840 F. 2d 1149, 1152 (4th Cir. 1988). The factual allegations should be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleading party. Davis v. City of Portsmouth, 579 F. Supp. 1205, 1209-10 (E.D. Va. 1983), affd, 742 F .2d 1448 (4th Cir. 1984). Citation: 93F. 2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) Any judgment procured by fraud is null and void. An erroneous judgment
3

may be attacked collaterally. Plaintiff has asked several times to be allowed in front of a Judge to explain documents. Plaintiff is aware that Plaintiff must show that Plaintiff can prove each element of alleged facts in her claims. That to seek relief for the violation of a persons Federal and Constitution rights under Title 42 1983 it allows Plaintiff to her rights contained in the United States Constitution as defined by Federal Law. A. Claim one Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being Catholic That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion That this is a Hate Crime and Hate crime laws are colorblind Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld hate crimes of the First amendment attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white victim. B. Claim two Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being black balled by the Old Boys Network / Judicial Community due to her x-husband being the son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier whom was the Husband to Defendant Ilona a lawyer who has also intervened into Defendants Divorce. That the discrimination and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered by others inferior to the other. C. Claim Three Plaintiff has forever been harmed with the blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com That Plaintiff has a protected characteristic which will be proven as to why Plaintiff was sought out by Defendant and that factor is why Plaintiff was targeted by Defendants D. Claim Four - Breach of Contract by the Judicial System in Virginia by collecting fees for services Plaintiff has been denied. The actions will be proven factually by Orders, Letters, Documents filed in the court and other.

That the constitutional Right of Due Process has been denied time and time again. E. Claim Five Plaintiff has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory that Plaintiff has THE TRUTH which is an absolute defense . That the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not F. Claim Six Plaintiff will prove a violation of Plaintiffs Bill of Rights the Four Basic freedoms are being Violated The Four Freedoms 1. 2. 3. 4. Freedom of speech Freedom of worship Freedom from want Freedom from fear

Plaintiff will show the actions of the Defendants were actions that were willful acts were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless That the defendants were acting under the color of State and Federal law. That the Constitutional Rights of due process are factual allegations that will be proven through documents, letters, e-mails and actions of defendants. That defends had been given notice, and this court is aware of with the threat from Defendant Ilonas attorney. That Defendants never filed a response, in regard to the Restraining Order and Injunction. Defendants were notified on or around January 22, 2014 and Order was not written until January 31, 2014 with NOT ONE Defendant responding or disputing Plaintiffs facts, that is unless there was ex-parte communications.

2. Page 3 Paragraph 3 Insofar as the plaintiff complains of wrongdoing on the part of the Virginia courts, this Court has no authority to review, overturn or otherwise effect their rulings. Plaintiff is not aware of asking this court to overturn any rulings in any documents submitted. Plaintiff is in this court and has pointed out the criminal actions of the Virginia courts as to why she is in this court. This court has Jurisdiction over all civil rights matters and Plaintiffs Civil Rights because she is Catholic has been violated, along with other Constitutional Rights Plaintiff is not in any way asking this court to overturn any actions of the Virginia Courts. 3. The Stalking and Malicious Treatment of Plaintiff by Defendants Ilona and Defendant Leah Lax et al along with others This e-mail alone sent by Presidential Candidate for 2016 with the collusion of lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier and other e-mails that were falsified in a website jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com say Plaintiff is racist against others is enough to prove liable intent Yet Plaintiff has supplied other evidence in her defense. This e-mail is not the only one Plaintiff will enter into evidence at the appropriate time several e-mails similar in nature to this. The Hate defendants have for Catholics, Christians, Muslims, Homosexuals and with the picture of and the talk of First Lady Michele Obama having a penis you could add in my opinion African Americans. No matter what your opinion on Hillary Clinton or Michele Obama are the disrespect is disgusting and according to the law liable.
From: LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com> To: jwgrenadier@gmail.com Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM

want to hear something more scarier I contacted Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt is over
From:LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com>
Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM 6

To: jwgrendier@gmail.com
you know what YOU DIDN"T HELP JEWS

YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN

THEM IN BECAUSE ONE PERSON DID SOMETHING TO YOU THAT WAS JEWISH. YOU MADE YOUR BED
AND YOU LIED IN IT ! THIS FAMILY REJECTED YOU FOR NOT BEING JEWISH. YOU STUPID GOY.

YOU

WERE REJECTED .. GET THAT INTO YOUR THICK SKULL. NOW YOU ARE MAKING UP STORIES AND SPREADING LIES! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON EASY STREET.
WELL GET OFF YOUR ASS. GOOD YOU LOST ALL YOUR MONEY MAKES YOU HUMBLE. AND GOOD YOU GOT A WHIPPING FROM A JEWISH LAWYER WHO WAS SMARTER THEN YOURS. GOOD FOR HER. I WOULD HIRE HER IN A HEART BEAT. SHE WENT AFTER A JEW HATING NAZI AND SHE WON. AND I HOPE SHE GAVE HER GRANDSON A GOOD TALKING TO FOR MARRYING A GOY IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS ZIPPER UP AND NOT HAVE HAD SEX WITH A MENTALLY SICK PIECE OF CRAP LIKE YOU.

YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI!

HATE YOURSELF THAT IS WHY YOU HATE JEWS YOU ARE BLOCKED! -

YOU

The Words of Presidential candidate Leah Lax et al A. Defendant Ilona since 1985 with the purchase of 28E has lied and stolen from Plaintiff. Plaintiff is not alone in this type of treatment. Documents will show she was in collusion with the Judges, other lawyers, the VSB, the JIRC, the Supreme Court of Virginia, she is a lawyer who is guilty of of being involved in , Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest related to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of
7

the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC 912. With her Intention to 18 USC 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2-172 - Forging, uttering, etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of Defendant Ilona. B. Defendant Leah Lax et al since May of 2013 has been stalking and started harassing Plaintiff in hopes by all appearance winning favor with other Florida wealthy Jews like Defendant Ilona and her family. To win favor she by all appearance to destroy Plaintiff, with willful acts that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. Plaintiff has in past filings included Defendants intent through her getting Plaintiff kicked off one of her Facebook pages, with over 2300 likes will forever damage Plaintiff. That Plaintiff will be able to show that Leah Lax et al and her Campaign is a Fraud. She has yet to file a Financial disclosure with the FEC and collecting donations since 2011, and has several outlets that she is collecting money for her campaign this is a quote off of her Piryx site.
I affirm that the following statements are true and accurate:
Contributions to LORETTA MILLER are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes. Contributions from foreign nationals and federal government contractors are prohibited. LORETTA MILLER is registered with the Federal Election Commission as an independent expenditure committee. Accordingly, we may accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and other organizations. Your contribution is not subject to FEC limits. LORETTA MILLER spending is independent, and it does not make contributions to, or coordinate its spending with, any candidates or political parties

4. To warrant preliminary injunctive relief, the moving party must show

A. Substantial likelihood of success on the merits Plaintiff believes she has provided this court with the information needed to outline the actions of both defendants and the Criminal actions of all the Defendants along with documentation that should without doubt assure this court B. That she would suffer irreparable injury if the injunction were not granted Plaintiff has a child friendly product that has been for ever harmed by the loss of Social Media, the blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com the e-mails that were created by or from the hacking of Plaintiffs computer that state the following AGAIN PLAINTIFF HAS NEVER SAID THIS! Plaintiff WILL BE PROVE These emails to BE THE FRIVOLOUS imaginative of Defendants to permanently harm Plaintiff. Just the name of the blog itself is offensive and violates Plaintiffs Constitutional rights and is libel and deformation of character of Plaintiff - jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Janice Wolk Grenadier wishes death on Loretta Lax Miller's son who is going in for surgery
If you want to read what sick piece of garbage Janice Wolk Grenadier aka Granny Panties is, you should read the newest email sent to us by her. -----Original Message----From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com> To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234< leahlax1234@aol.com> Sent: Wed , Jan 8, 2014 1:40 pm Subject: I hope your son DIES I hope your son dies during his surgery tomorrow! It will be one less JEW BOY out there. He should have died at childbirth. You can bury your son and then die after! Warmly, JW Grenadier What kind of sick piece of garbage does that? What kind of sick, evil, and sadistic person would tell a mother that they hope her kid dies during surgery? This shows what kind of sick, sadistic evil piece of filth that Janice Wolk Grenadier is and should be put away for her sick actions. Who would wish a person death? Janice Wolk Grenadier would.
9

We here at Muggy Cat want to wish your son a healthy recovery on his surgery Ms. Lax Miller. We are so sorry you are being harassed by that sick woman. Posted by muggy cat at 11:21 AM

Monday, January 6, 2014

This explains it's self
-----Original Message----From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com> To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com> Sent: Tue , Jan 7, 2014 12:15 am Subject: Re: Had it with you! Look you Jew Bastard I had it with you and now you are going to pay. Warmly, JW Grenadier

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Is this the writing of a crazy woman
-----Original Message----From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com> To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234 <leahlax1234@aol.com> Sent: Sun , Jan 5, 2014 9:45 pm Subject: YOU FUCKING JEWS You refuse to take my side. I wrote to you about my problems and you called me names "Me and My family had nothing to do with your girls because you raised them Catholic" by - Jewish attorney Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman - of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet & Kiesler Israel wants the United States of America to defend them - yet some of the most powerful Jews in the Washington DC area - are discriminating against Catholics, Corrupting the Judicial System, and Cheating the IRS. - My personal opinion is we need to be friends with Israel - But, they have to have the same respect for other religions - and for the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Courts and the United States of America's Constitution - Very powerful Jews in the DC area Ilona Ely Freedman Heckman and Yoav Katz are using their money and power to buy their war around the Judicial System and cheat the IRS! you can read more at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com Now you tell Ilona to give me my money. No one is going to believe you. They will believe me because I tell the TRUTH! and you Jews all lie. Jews like you belong in your graves. I deserve that money! I have a gun and I know how to use it! When Hillary gets into office, I am going to make sure all of you FUCKING JEWS are put into concentration camps to die. I support Hillary and she hates you FUCKING JEWS! Warmly, JW Grenadier

10

This letter came to us here at Muggy Cat at 9:45 PM EST. Doesn't this show the kind of obsession that Janice Wolk Grenadier has against anyone that doesn't agree with her. What is next? Is she going to go after our families? However she went after her family or should we say ex-family who disowned her. We have posted previous letters that Janice Wolk Grenadier had sent to her family in previous blog posts. Now here is something really funny and intersting about Janice Wolk Grenadier. Well actually a few funny things. Today she was seen naked in her back yard building an ice alter to her Dark Lord Satan. She was doing this in the freezing rain. The scary part was she had icicles hanging from her oversized nipples and from her pubic hair. She then took a large icicle and began to masterbate with it until it melted. A neighbor had seen Janice Wolk Grenadier walking out of a sex shop Friday night with a large bag filled with sex toys and two very large women who looked like Amazons. They were seen driving to a gay bar in which Janice and the two women frequent and have pajama parties afterwards. She left Saturday morning with her hair disarray and a smile on her face. A dog collar could be seen around her neck and welts on her arms and legs. We don't think she is the dominant one in this relationship. Family services should have taken her kids away from her years ago. She neglected them for her sexual pleasures and alcohol addiction. Janice Wolk Grenadier adores her Fuher Adolf Hitler who was also bi-sexual. Janice Wolk Grenadier has been seen wearing a painted on mustache just like her idol and walking around wearing a Swasticka on her rare selfie

of Janice Wolk Grenadier

This classless woman should be put away in a padded cell so she can't hurt anyone else. Someone please call the authorities to have her institutionalized for her safety and for the safety of others. Remember she carries a gun!

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Janice Wolk Grenadier supports the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton
Not only is Janice Wolk Grenadier a traitor to the American people by being a card carrying Commie Pinko but she is also supporting the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton. Yes we said it here, Anti Christs meaning plural. Why is Janice doing this? Because they are not only going to let her keep her hairy vag but they are going to give her the chance to grow a penis as well. Well penises. Yes, Janice Wolk Grenadier will have 6 penises all over her body including one over her vagina. The other 5 will be as so: one in the palm of each hand, one on the bootom of each foot and one right where a tramp stamp would be on her back. That way when Janice Wolk Grenadier dies, she can go to Allah's heaven and have her 72 virgins. These 72 virgins will be a mix of males and females that she can rape with all of her penises and then the next morning at sun up they become virgins again. We have figured it out that the fetal body of little Joshua that Janice keeps in the basement of her home is going to be the vessel for the Dark Lord Satan himself to resurrect in a human body to carry out the apocolypse. That way, Janie Wolk Grenadier is guaranteed her 6 penises. Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and Obama's
11

support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the ObamaCare and Islamic Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the Catholic Church's values of having Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Husein Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy American Family Values and Janice has no values and worships Satan. We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and the wonders God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her soul as well as her fugly body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan. -----Original Message----From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com> To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234 <leahlax1234@aol.com> Sent: Wed , Jan 1, 2014 10:45 am Subject: Re: i agree with you You FUCKEN JEWS!!!!!! ALL OF YOU . DICK FARREL JOSH COHEN, LEAH LAX AKA LORETTA LAX MILLER AND THE REST OF YOU FUCKEN 30 JEWS. Hitler was right! Ya'll deserve to die! YOU SHOULD BE PLACED IN A BIG OVEN. Warmly, JW Grenadier We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to stone. Posted by muggy cat at 8:48 AM Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook Labels: CIA, FBI, Hillary Rodman Clinton, Janice Wolk Grenadier, KGB, leah lax, MI5, MI6, My Pillow Pack, Obama, virginia law 2010

That the above is just 3 pages out of almost 200 printed out pages of slander and Libel of Plaintiff by Defendants. Plaintiff felt the e-mails that bear her name that she did not write should hold a lot of wait in what Plaintiff will be able to prove. C. That an injunction would not substantially injure other interested parties and This blog has hurt no one but Plaintiff and her ability to market and advertise a Child Friendly product. This blog and other actions were deliberate willful acts that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. That the hacking and killing of

12

Plaintiffs computers was malicious and has also prevented Plaintiff the right to market her product. D. That the public interest would be furthered by the injunction the HATE CRIME OF THIS is sinful and that this court cannot see that becomes questionable to the rational of fairness. That the sexual and in appropriate photos of Hillary Clinton and Michele Obama in there blogs The racist and religious overtures of HATE BY DEFENDENTS is so obvious that to have to go any further would show Bias by this court and any one of normal moral value. . Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955) Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court against discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the Judges, lawyers, elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of or one of them. 5. Jurisdiction Page 3 Paragraph 2 Plaintiff has dropped Andrea Grenadier as a Defendant to not be in conflict of diversity jurisdiction
28 U.S.C. 1343(a)(3) (1993) provides as follows: (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: . . . (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States. 28 U.S.C. 1331 (1993) provides that district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: (1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42;
13

(2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent; (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States; (4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote. Any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

History Plaintiff in September of 2007 went to Court in the City of Alexandria Virginia. Plaintiff had followed all the rules of filing and service. Defendant Ilona a lawyer lied in court to the Judge, and the Judge reprimanded Plaintiff telling her not to re-file until October 2007. Plaintiff that night met a Federal Judge from this court. He informed Plaintiff of her rights He informed Plaintiff You shouldnt be crying you should be rejoicing You have just won your case No Judge likes a lawyer lying to him in court on a napkin he outlined what I was going to put in Plaintiffs Motion for Default. That Motion for Default was not heard until December of 2007 when the Judges could find a retired Judge to rule in the favor of Defendant Ilona this practice would continue and continues today. The Judges and the evidence shows this is not the last time the documents and statements in court by Defendant Ilona and others have not been disingenuous all the way to the Supreme Court of Virginia. The slippery slope that would open up the truth of how Plaintiff since October of 1985 had been manipulate and that the actions were and are still willful acts that are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. The Law is very clear that the Judges who have acted by ruling in Favoritism and Cronyism and not by the Rules of the Supreme Court. Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v.

14

Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) Plaintiff is aware of and understands the difficulties for any Judge in this case. But, the law has been abused and broken by the State of Virginias judicial system and Plaintiff will be able to show this is not a unique situation but, normal practice in the State of Virginia. The difference is they have not been able to kill Plaintiff or break Plaintiff, and Plaintiff prays this court look at the evidence in documents and gives Plaintiff the right to be heard. No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it. Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882) Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well. State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law. Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976) Whenever any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in fraud upon the court. In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), The Constitution of the United States A fundamental, guarantee that all legal proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard before the government acts to take away one's life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a law shall not be unreasonable, Arbitrary, or capricious. The constitutional guarantee of due process of law, found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels of government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional rights to life, liberty, and
15

property. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment ratified in 1791, asserts that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This amendment restricts the powers of the federal government and applies only to actions by it. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, declares,"[N]or shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" ( 1). This clause limits the powers of the states, rather than those of the federal government. Plaintiff can show harm and the harm that has forever been done to her from the actions of the above Defendants. Plaintiff may not have put all information in the best order but, has done the best she can do. She has done it with a pure heart and honest way and still has not had her day in court to be heard. Plaintiff has still had not had due process Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971), was a case before the United States Supreme Court giving the right to due process and to be heard. Plaintiffs ability to perform simple every day work has been stripped of her by the actions of the above Defendants with her social media, her computers and e-mail being hacked and this court is looking the other way. Comes now Plaintiff begs this court to stop the terrorism of the above Defendants. The website jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com is an illegal blog, the blog is and always has been riddled with lies. That Plaintiff with good reason of the past actions of Defendants is afraid for her life and her daughters. Plaintiff is aware of over whelming this court with evidence. Plaintiff is afraid for her life and if a strong message is not sent to these Defendants soon Plaintiff believes she or her girls will be harmed. Plaintiff as before asks for the following:

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court:

16

A. The right to go in front of a Federal Grand Jury with her witnesses and ask for a special Grand Jury to look into the Virginia Judicial System. B. Have removed immediately the blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot. C. That a restraining order for all of the above be issued to include that they are not to talk about Plaintiff on line or to in any way contact Plaintiff or her daughters D. Award Plaintiff if joined with counsel reasonable attorneys fees and costs that lawyers have no fiduciary responsibility to Defendants E. Enter a permanent injunction requiring Defendants to remove all disingenuous information from the internet on Plaintiff. F. Grant to Plaintiff such other and further relief as this Honorable Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances, including but not limited to appropriate injunctive relief. G. Allow Plaintiff her right to Due Process and the right to be heard by a Judge and have any questions he or she may have responded to. H. JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a jury trial, pursuant to the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. Date: February 6, 2014 Respectfully submitted, /S/_____________________________
Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 Telephone (202) 368-7178 Email jwgrenadier@gmail.com

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Pro se 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 jwgrenadier@gmail.com 202-368-7178 Plaintiff v. ILIONA GRENADIER HECKMAN 4200 Massachusetts Ave Apt 410 Washington DC 20016-4752 igrenadier@vafamilylaw.com 703-683-9000

Civil Action No. Certificate of Service For Restraining Order

GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT & KEISLER, PC 649 S. Washington Street Alexandria, VA 22314 703-683-9000 ROBIN/RACHEAL GRENADIER Tel Aviv Israel Address unkown RLGRENNIE@YAHOO.COM LORETTA LAX MILLER aka- LEAH LAX akaMUGGY CAT aka- BILLY SULLIVAN Presidential Candidate for 2016 Campaign Headquarters 350 Market Street Highspire, PA 17304 info@LorettaMiller4President.com CAMPAIGN FOR LORETTA LAX MILLER And all employees/volunteers 350 Market Street Highspire, PA 17304 DEFENDANTS - Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Where is Plaintiff on February 10, 2014 filed for a EMERGENCEY RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER That Service to the following Defendants will be done through e-mail to the above known address of defendants Date: February 10, 2014 Respectfully submitted, /S/_____________________________
Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 Telephone (202) 368-7178 Email jwgrenadier@gmail.com

18