Disadvantage in General for Both NaOH and KOH mostly KOH: Presence of water content generally manifests itself through excessive soap production. Apart from that, the soaps of saturated fatty acids tend to solidify at ambient temperatures and thus a reaction mixture with excessive soap may gel-up and form a semi-solid mass which is very difficult to recover.
Methaoxides: The formation of methyl esters by transesterfication stoichiometrically requires three moles of alcohol for every mole of triglyceride However, transesterification is an equilibrium reaction in which a large excess of the alcohol is required to drive the reaction close to completion. Fortunately, the equilibrium constant favors the methyl esters such that only a 6:l molar ratio of methanol: triglyceride is sufficient to cause a 95-98% yield of ester. It might be anticipated that, in such an equilibrium system, the observed phase separation of the by product, glycerol, would play a major role in achieving conversions close to 100%. Fuel standards currently developing for biodiesel methyl esters severely limit the mono-and diglyceride contents. Because of this, and the high cost of the raw material, very high conversions are important, and if achieved, could eliminate the necessity for distillation beyond that required for removal of the excess alcohol. The 6: l methanol: oil ratio, which appears to be that being adopted in commercial processes, was also used in the kinetic study of 1986. In this sense, the reactions that used sodium or potassium hydroxide were faster than the reactions with the sodium or potassium methoxides. Regarding both types, the transesterification with the sodium catalyst was faster than the reaction with the potassium catalyst. Thus, the near 100% methyl ester concentration was obtained at 30 min with sodium hydroxide, at 45 min when using sodium methoxide or potassium hydroxide and after 4 h with potassium methoxide. The preferred catalysts for large continuous-flow production processes are Sodium and potassium methaoxide which is now commercially available as well. In transesterification, the effective species of catalysis is the methoxide radicals (CH3O). The activity of a catalyst depends upon the amount of methoxide radicals available for the reaction (Komers et al., 2001a, b). For sodium or potassium hydroxide, methoxide ion is prepared in situ by reacting hydroxide and methanol: This reaction also yields water that remains in the system. Hydrolysis of triglycerides and alkyl esters may occur due to the presence of water, which further leads to the formation of free fatty acids and thus to undesired soap. Saponification will also occur if a strong base, e.g., NaOH or KOH, is present in the system by reacting with esters and triglycerides directly. On the other hand, the water problem can be avoided if sodium and potassium methoxide solutions, which can be prepared water-free, are applied. Additionally, although the use of methoxides cannot avoid soap formation if the feedstock contains free fatty acids, which is also true for use of KOH or NaOH, but very little saponification of esters or triglycerides occurs because methoxides behave as weak Lewis bases. However all these base reactions differ at different conditions for example at 65 C and molar ratio 3:1 Sodium methaoxides yields more biodiesel but by increasing the molar ratio and decreasing temperature Potassium metha oxide will result in higher yield of biodiesel and lower yield of soap formation:
Optimization in transesterifying methanol and canola oil using four alkaline catalyst formulations by examining their effects on biodiesel yield and soap formation at different catalyst molar concentrations, reaction temperatures, and methanol-to-oil molar ratios. Optimum operating conditions for maximizing biodiesel yield and minimizing soap formation were determined by statistically analyzing the experimental data using a multiple response optimization statistical software and further verified through experimentation.
According to Freedman et al. (1986) NaOCH3 is a more effective catalyst formulation than NaOH and almost equal oil conversion was observed at 6:1 alcohol-to-oil molar ratio for 1%wt NaOH and 0.5%wt NaOCH3. Vicente et al. (2004) reported higher yields with methoxide catalysts, but the rate of reaction was highest for NaOH and lowest for KOCH3 at 65C, a methanol-to-oil ratio of 6:1, and a catalyst concentration of 1%wt. It was observed that potassium based catalysts gave better yield than sodium-based catalysts and methoxide catalysts gave higher yields than their corresponding hydroxide catalyst. The trend observed can be modelled as follows: KOCH 3 > NaOCH 3 > KOH > NaOH
The table below summarizes the results obtained among the four catalyst formulations:
Generally, the catalyst formulation on soap showed that potassium based catalysts resulted in higher soap formation than the corresponding sodium-based catalysts. Only KOH was found to have a significantly higher level of soap formation than the other three formulations in terms of soap formation: NaOCH 3 > NaOH > KOCH 3 >>KOH
It was observed that methoxide catalysts led to better biodiesel yields than hydroxide catalysts. The methoxide catalysts not only accelerated the reaction but also elevated the conversion equilibrium. Based on statistical optimization, the operating conditions for maximizing biodiesel yield and minimizing soap formation were potassium methoxide as catalyst at a concentration of 0.2 mol/mol (1.59%wt), reaction temperature of 50 o C, and methanol-to-oil molar ratio of 4.5:1. This resulted in an optimum yield of 95.8% with a total soap formation of 0.75%.
Refrences : Gemma Vicente, Mercedes Martinez, Jos Aracil, Integrated biodiesel production: a comparison of different homogeneous catalysts systems, Bioresource Technology, Volume 92, Issue 3, May 2004, Pages 297-305, ISSN 0960-8524, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.08.014. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096085240300230X)
Man Kee Lam, Keat Teong Lee, Abdul Rahman Mohamed, Homogeneous, heterogeneous and enzymatic catalysis for transesterification of high free fatty acid oil (waste cooking oil) to biodiesel: A review, Biotechnology Advances, Volume 28, Issue 4, JulyAugust 2010, Pages 500-518, ISSN 0734-9750, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.03.002. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734975010000388)