Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Farmed homes and Hundew Development Group are considering two options or developing Eastview Development project!The irst option with smaller lots ma" "ield ro#ust rewards #ut involves greater ris$s compared to the second alternative with #igger lots which can ta$e o immediatel"! % cost #ene it anal"sis would #e use ul to evaluate the ris$s and rewards o development options!The magnitude o ris$s to #e managed #" #oth the companies will #e a crucial aspect o the decision ma$ing process !& the rewards justi " the ris$s' then the dela"ing the project ma$es sense! The su#tle e ect o dela"ing or ta$ing o project immediatel" re(uires care ul (ualitative and (uanitiative considerations to ull" evaluate its impact on the #oth companies!The core values o Hundew group triangulates around time' price and (ualit"! These have earned the compan" reputation' trust and made it a recogni)a#le #rand among its customers! &n the emerging mar$ets o Peter#orough' competition is ierce and land price'e*pensive!The resu#mission o the dra t plan ma" lead to dela"s and high development costs as compared to its competitors!Dela"ing the project will also e*pose it to mar$et' inancial' construction and partnership ris$s etc! resulting in lesser return on investment o sta$eholders! +econdl"' the project ma" #e rushed to meet inancial targets in case o approval o the ,smaller lot- scheme which ma" lead to compromise on the design' (ualit"' price and time ! Thirdl"' a dela" could ma$e the project vulnera#le to adverse mar$et conditions li$e high in lation and.or interest rates' recession etc! Furthermore' the companies are developing this land in partnership! % ter one "ear a partner in the project ma" #e una#le to meet its o#ligations and disagree on the wa" orward! NP/ anal"sis #ased on Discounted cash low 0D1F2 is used to evaluate the d"anamics o the projects gives negative NP/ o 034'556'7852 or dela"ing the project and positive NP/ o 39'6:8';<5 or ta$ing o the project immediatle"! =ut this anal"sis is #ased on a lot o assumptions! The demographic and mar$et stud" o Peter#orough area in conjunction with the developer>s e*perience in local mar$et will help #oth companies to decide the right mi*' t"pe' si)e' design' eatures' pricing and inall" sales! ?e er E*hi#it ; &n conclusion' proceeding with ,larger lot- option now will provide control on disputes and ris$s in d"namic and ris$" real estate mar$et! &t is strongl" recommended to go with the larger lot option e icientl"! & the project involves greater ris$s and more wor$ it leads to wasting resources on ine icient activities! The compan" should ocus on gaining inancial success and dominance in the real estate mar$et through customer engagement and e*perience o emplo"ees developed over the "ears to generate sustaina#le competitive advantage!