Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
and
2009
www.panoptikon.net
by
and
by
The United Arab Emirates is currently attempting to “modernize” within the shortest time
possible. Both Dubai and Abu Dhabi can afford all the components of modernization (the cities,
the buildings, the infrastructure, the media, the museums, the art, etc.) except the historical
time required for modernization. Although the expected results of this process are commonly
compared with the commercial and industrial centers of Europe, America, and Asia, they may
also be placed alongside African history, in which a similar timeframe has produced novel
interpretations of contemporaneity and globalization. Africa, like the Middle East, is traversing
a compressed time out of which its hopes to create a future (Njami 2005: 14). The historical
linkages of Africa and the Middle East offer an interesting point of intersection for this endeavor.
With its bold challenge to become a center of global finance, media, and culture, Dubai is
redrawing the map of commercial and artistic exchange. This endeavor involves the decentering
of European and American markets, with the emerging Dubai art market as a key example. A
circuit of African-Middle Eastern exchange could significantly rewrite the modernization of art
as well as the critical and aesthetic categories of modernism. Contemporary African art offers a
compelling venue for the reimagination of history, tradition, and modernity (Jewsiewicki 1991;
Jules-Rosette 1984; Kasfir 1999); and Simon Njami (2005) has specifically noted how a trans-Arab
exhibit of contemporary art would complement Africa Remix. African-Middle Eastern dialogue
remixes the history of modernity, as long as both sides are willing to take the time. African visions
of the contemporary condition resonate with the compressed time of Dubai’s modernization,
and African artists may approach Dubai as a new stage from which to address global audiences.
But this shimmering vision of the future, like much of Dubai, is still under construction.
In 1989, the Jordanian Royal Society of Fine Arts and the Islamic Arts Foundation
of the United Kingdom curated “Contemporary Art from the Islamic World.” The exhibit
traveled from London to Amman in the hope of highlighting “a new dimension in the
collaboration between East and West” (Ali 1989: x). Whereas artists from countries such as
Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Palestine, Syria, Sudan, Turkey, and Yemen merited individual catalog
essays, the UAE was addressed en masse with the other countries of the Gulf Cooperative
Council (GCC): Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. A brief five-page essay
(Ali 1989: 46-50) noted that contemporary art across the GCC region was still very much in
development. Of the 207 participating artists, only sixteen represented the GCC. The exhibit
did not include a single artist from the UAE. With the sole exception of the United Arab
Emirates, every GCC member country contributed at least one artist’s work. At the turn of
the century, acknowledgement of contemporary art was virtually nonexistent in the UAE.
More recently, the country has pursued dramatic development in hopes of becoming both
a regional and global center of media, and culture. The Dubai government built “Dubai Media
City” and “Dubai Internet City” to function as regional hubs for major broadcast and technology
companies. The Dubai media market now challenges the traditional Arabic centers of Egypt and
Lebanon for regional supremacy. Similarly massive economic investments have been directed
toward the trappings of artistic and cultural institutions, such as the proposed branches of the
Guggenheim and the Louvre museums in Abu Dhabi. The design of these buildings generated
an enormous amount of publicity although a grain of sand is yet to be lifted in their construction.
The government-monitored media presents the idea as if it were already a reality, and the mere
proposal of such grand projects justifies their imagined contributions. Adopting a mantra of
“If you build it, they will come,” UAE development plans assume that once grand museums,
international art fairs, expensive art prizes, and luxury apartments are established, a vibrant
community of local artists, collectors, and critics will quickly follow. As centers of art and
culture, both Abu Dhabi and Dubai place the simulacra of the cart (a relevance in the international
art world) before the local horses of collectors, artworks, venues, and art communities.
Alongside the Abu Dhabi museums, the Art Dubai fair and the Sharjah Biennial are also
heavily investing in contemporary art. The first is primarily market driven, while the latter
maintains a more curatorial focus. But like the Abu Dhabi museums, these institutions reach
toward Europe and America as sources of innovation rather than creating new centers or new
coalitions of contemporary art. Although Art Dubai along with its satellite art fairs brought
over a billion dollars to the region, the majority of its seventy exhibitors were European or
American galleries. Approximately one third of the stalls represented local and regional
galleries, and a few Asian galleries rounded out the total. Art Dubai inaugurated the Abraaj
Capital Art Prize in 2009 with much fanfare. The Prize, which is championed as the world’s
largest monetary art prize, recognizes innovative collaborations between international curators
and artists working in the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia (the MENASA Region).
The three winning entries collected over $1 million each in prize money. Each of these prizes
highlighted the collaboration of a European gallerist and a Middle Eastern artist they had “found.”
In comparison to the monetary glitz of Art Dubai, the Sharjah Biennial is an international
exhibit sponsored by the Sharjah Art Museum. The Emirate’s Biennial began in 1993, with
2009 being its ninth iteration. The event’s museum sponsorship affords a greater degree of
artistic experimentation than the market-driven Dubai art fair, and it boasts a wide variety
of media, conceptual pieces, and site-specific installations. In previous years, the Sharjah
Biennial directly followed Art Dubai. This allowed art enthusiasts to attend both events
in succession. A rich interplay arose from such a major regional exhibition following
on the heels of a thriving Art Dubai. The fair helped establish a collector’s market in
the UAE, and the Biennial pointed the way toward a more experimental artistic future.
In 2009, however, the artistic vision of the UAE appeared to falter. The Sharjah
Biennial and Art Dubai coincided, as a larger initiative known as Contemparabia organized
“Gulf Art Week 2009.” This multinational event unfolded over six days with happenings in
Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah, and Doha, Qatar. Media coverage was typically effusive and
championed the event as a bold initiative, but the distance between sites, difficulties of
transportation, and scheduling conflicts tended to isolate venues rather than connect them.
Attempting to harness a surging interest in Middle Eastern contemporary art, the overlapping
schedules intended to pour Art Dubai’s increased attendance into the Biennial. But it instead
resulted in a competition for resources and visitors. Most visitors directed their attention to
one site rather than traversing the region. Consequently, the expected dialogue connecting
art marketing, curatorial exhibition, and museum planning failed to materialize. Instead,
the UAE and the region appeared struggling to find an artistic voice. This confusion was
mirrored during the Venice Biennale in June 2009, where both the UAE Ministry of Culture
and the Abu Dhabi Authority on Culture and Heritage hosted competing pavilions (Al Qassemi
2009). Each pavilion claimed the national banner of the UAE and featured many of the same
artists. This inadvertent rivalry puzzled a number of visitors and reinforced a chaotic vision
of art in the UAE. This was the UAE’s first year at the Venice Biennale, and the dueling
pavilions highlighted the country’s financial ability to purchase multiple seats at the table
rather than champion local artists and regional galleries as rising stars of contemporary art.
The film has conducted interviews with over fifty Dubai-based artists, gallerists, curators, and
scholars in search of the city’s artistic pulse. Although the growth of contemporary art in Dubai
strikes an overall positive chord, interviewees lamented a lack of local critics and the failure of
venues to inspire critical dialogue and engagement. As the contemporary art community in the
UAE deals with logistical issues of event planning and coordination, the negotiation of venues
and scheduling distracts from the need for critical commentary. Many gallerists also comment
that the educational basis for art appreciation is lacking. The unflattering label of “decorative”
was frequently applied to describe local artistic preferences. The Dubai art scene privileges a
connoisseurship of expensive collection and privileged display rather than aesthetic interaction
with the city, the community, the environment, or broader issues of social and political concern.
differentiates the cultural and artistic position of modernism from the infrastructural technologies
of modernization. For proponents of critical engagement rather than decoration, the cultivation
of artistic modernism offers yet another outward marker of the UAE’s attempted modernization.
In this light, the number of art galleries is comparable to the development of highways or the
number of regional internet portals. But the ideals of aesthetic modernism cannot be easily
measured with quantifiable markers of economic and technological development. Moreover, the
of art. In this history, modern tendencies stress a critical reassessment of the past and its artistic
products, preoccupation with the demands of artistic media, an experimentation with that media,
originality of presentation, the rejection of established hierarchies (both social and consumerist),
and the autonomy of art as a neutral sphere of critical and aesthetic discourse (Adorno 1997;
Harrison 1996). Although an environment of postmodern concurrence has replaced the teleology
of European modernization, the postmodern continues to reference the modern, and traits of
modernism remain markers of a vibrant artistic community. Contemporary art, with is multiple
messages and interpretations, positions aesthetic modernism as the sign of artistic modernization
in much the same way that capitalism, media networks, and sophisticated technology become
signs of economic and industrial modernization. Contemporary art builds upon the modernist
traditional media as a premise of artistic practice. Critical deployment of artistic forms imbues
the artistic presentation of contemporary experience with aesthetic and cultural value. The
autonomous function of art positions it as both recorder and commentator on that experience.
The Dubai art community is currently negotiating whether tacit acknowledgment of this
ideological modernism is truly a prerequisite for contemporary art. Dubai certainly does not
own terms, where “modern” is conveniently reified into an availability of luxury goods, a
thriving leisure class, and a vibrant consumer economy. In the cash-based lingua franca of
Dubai, modernization is readily available as long as one can afford it. Everything becomes
subject to its exchange value. The idea of art as a commodity is therefore not problematic. The
problem lies instead with the perceived value of that commodity. With the global recession and
a weakening economy, art can no longer afford to remain merely a status symbol of financial
surplus. In order to stay viable, the Dubai art scene must cultivate an appreciation of art
that is more than decorative. The challenge of art in Dubai faces a particularly postmodern
dilemma: how can art be elevated to the position of a Louis Vuitton handbag (Lopardo 2009)?
The enthusiastic adoption of modern materialism, separated from the historical and social
struggles that produced the material infatuation, highlights perhaps the trickiest of postmodern
quandarys: what are the cultural implications of modernization—and, for that matter, post-
modernization—in a society that has not embraced modernism? While the UAE eagerly adopts a
consumerist society, the modernist ideals that question tradition, champion the novel, and embrace
social experimentation, all of which arose hand in hand with consumerism, remain foreign. As an
autonomous realm, contemporary art offers a potential site in which these critical visions might
converge with material marketing. The modernist tendency to reexamine tradition and suggest
aesthetic alternatives (“primitive,” “modern,” and “remixed”) can draw upon Dubai’s diverse
population, 80% of which are expatriates. Although expatriate and local artists respond to a
common urban landscape, they bring with them a variety of traditions, cultural forms, and media.
But Dubai’s social and ethnic rifts are particularly noticeable in the art world. Even
the term “Dubai artist” remains contentious. Despite large expatriate communities, the
term may only refer to Arab Emirati artists. Or it may apply to anyone practicing within the
Emirate, regardless of nationality or origin. The UAE remains a strongly hierarchical society
with significant ethnic, gender, and class divisions. Contributions of south Asian workers
light than the cultural initiatives of European and American consultants. Consequently,
minor works by European, American, and Persian artists present a cache of validity that
bolsters their attractiveness to Dubai-based collectors. This trumps the autonomy of art, in
marker of value. In the current Dubai market, the origin of an artwork—whether Emirati,
The lack of African artistic representation in the Dubai market highlights this complex
cultural maneuvering. Bo Tasle d’Heliand spent a number of years studying art in the workshops
of Kenya, and has recently relocated to Dubai as an artist in residence. His current project
“Extraction narrative; coordinates: 1°47’N, 36°47’E” combines Google satellite imagery with
a record of his time spent with the Turkana. After struggling to find an African presence in
the Dubai art scene, d’Heliand discovered that African artwork, as well as work perceived as
addressing African themes, is much more difficult to display in Dubai than elsewhere. Whereas
European and American museums and galleries have a niche for African art, both traditional and
contemporary, Middle Eastern collectors and audiences seem to appreciate neither the traditions
nor their creative expropriation in contemporary settings (d’Heliand 2009). The local preference
for “decorative” pieces further weakens the appeal of experimental works, especially those that
challenge the social hierarchy or remix artistic traditions. If they choose to present work that
critically engages their audiences, gallery owners must make a two-fold argument: (1) That the
national origin and decorative display of artworks are not the sole markers of value and (2) that a
remixing of tradition is as important to the future vision of Dubai as the fetishization of Europe.
Dubai specifically, and the Middle East more generally, are in dire need of new languages
to discuss modernity. Contemporary art has a significant role to play in these discussions.
The autonomy of art provides a laboratory for presenting, displaying, and sharing alternative
visions of the future. Numerous commentators on African art have noted how the artistic
laboratory short-circuits the historical time of modernism (Jewsiewicki 1993; Kasfir 1999).
The critical experiments of contemporary art draw upon all available resources: forms,
media, and traditions. They remix and re-envision the contemporary environment without
requiring the recreation of histories and processes that produced this environment. When
an artistic display strikes a chord, it justifies the time (or the lack of time) required for its
production. The process of production is as much a critique as the results are aesthetic.
Contemporary African artistic has located a number of new languages in the visual and
performative products of the continent. In explaining the need for Africa Remix, Simon Njami
stated that African artists reached a new plateau in the examination, representation, and remixing
of contemporaneity: “Artists have no need to prove anything through their work. They are
no longer essentially ethnic, though no-one can disown their roots, they are aesthetic and
political” (Njami 2005: 21). This third wave of African art was preceded by two stages, which
mirror the responses to tradition present in contemporary Middle Eastern art: first, a celebration
of African artistic roots and a subsequent period of denial in which the media and forms of
European practice were adopted with vigor (ibid.). The third stage of Africa Remix synthesizes
the African thesis and the European antithesis in proper Hegelian fashion. It moves discussion
away from the origin of the art and into the realm of the contemporary. Today’s artistic quest,
according to Njami, is existential. Contemporary art explores the current condition in all its
ramifications, mutations, and differences. There may be no global definition of the contemporary
condition, but its questions and responses overlap both geographic and artistic boundaries.
For Njami, the “Chaos” of African art has “metamorphosized” into a critical commentary.
The art of Africa Remix refashions itself in a dialectical response to tradition and employs
artistic media to experiment with and explore the contemporary condition: “Today’s Africa
(Njami 2005: 15). In particular, scholars such as Bogumil Jewsiewicki (1991; 1993), Johannes
Fabian (1996), and Bennetta Jules-Rosette (2006) have explored Congolese popular painting
as an incredbly rich field of symbolic and critical dialogue. Criticisms of history, modernity,
and the contemporary condition are re-presented by artists and transposed into a modeling
system of hidden messages and visual codes (Jules-Rosette 1987: 96). Popular painting
neither eschews modernity nor provides a viable alternative. Instead, it “explores modernity,
tracks it down everywhere, examines it, critiques it, caricatures it in an effort to capture its
formula and key, to possess it” (Jewsiewicki 1993: 790). In decoding these messages, viewers
similarly attempt to capture a formula. They follow the artists to arrive at their own critical
assessment and self-reflection. Popular paintings perform not only a decorative role, but also
a dialogical one. They do not simply display scenes for a viewer; they engage a viewer. The
frame of artistic display becomes a communicative, symbolic, and aesthetic practice in which
messages of tradition, politics, value, and experience are negotiated before the viewer’s eyes.
A similar aesthetic shift is currently occurring in the Arab world and the Middle East. The
realm of contemporary calligraphic art is one area in which Middle Eastern artists are vibrantly
rewriting tradition (Ali 1997). A number of recent studies and exhibitions have explored the
form and a symbolic image in contemporary aesthetics (Shabout 2007; Porter and Eigner 2008;
Kreamer, et. al 2007). Contemporary calligraphic works directly address the tradition of Islamic
art, with its interplay of decorative and communicative functions. But the remixing of the written
word also strikes a deeper chord in the examination of Middle Eastern modernity. The linguistic
modernization of Arabic is an incredibly delicate and complex issue (Shabout 1999; Haeri
2003: 73-74). An artistic exploration of language can highlight these issues in ways that other
artistic traditions may not. Contemporary calligraphic art therefore introduces both an aesthetic
and a linguistic framework for reassessing Arabic tradition. As these visions gain value as a
decorative art, their underling critique sets the stage for a wider embrace of modernist aesthetics.
Roberto Lopardo, a practicing artist and Chair of the Visual Communication Department
at the American University in Dubai, has noticed a significant rise in the reflexivity of regional
art and design over the past five years. In 2007, Lopardo co-curated the first “Basically Human”
exhibit and a second iteration of the same theme is currently on display in New York. The title
derives from the products of the first exhibit, which emphasized issues of identity as young
Middle Eastern artists struggled to find their own voice. In the current show, however, Lopardo
noted that identity concerns are no longer the primary motif. Instead, artists are beginning to
experiment with their chosen form as a means of critical commentary and self-expression. The
dialogue between artist and viewer has become a discourse of aesthetics and politics rather than
a decorative display or an argument of self-justification. Dubai-based artists are “moving out
of the studio and into the space that surrounds them” as art provides a medium through which
to introduce novel discussions and engage the wider community. Alongside the imported
handbags of Louis Vuitton and the construction of the world’s grandest structures, “contemporary
art is increasingly becoming a partner in Dubai’s changes, rather than just an observer.”
Dubai continues to emerge as a center of artistic production and exchange. Initially fueled by
financial investment, its cultural base has been strengthened by a cosmopolitan population, an
increasingly educated workforce, and a high percentage of design workers. The past five years
have seen a boom in the opening of galleries and exhibition halls. In 2005, the city had less than
five exhibit halls. It now has over thirty galleries, as well as numerous art organizations, studio
spaces, art education centers, and the region’s signature collector event: Art Dubai. Although the
recent global economic downturn has slowed development throughout the UAE, the number of
galleries has reached a tipping point where they are ensured of continued dialogue and success.
Kouroush Nouri (2009), the owner of the Dubai-based gallery Carbon 12, sees the downturn
as a rich opportunity for local art. Tighter budgets may beneficially trim some of the excess
of the Dubai art scene and firmly establish a regional focus on curatorial and artistic quality.
The current round of questioning is therefore no longer whether contemporary art will
arrive in the UAE, but what form that art will take. How will local art revisit the question
of modernity? More importantly, can Dubai emerge as a cultural center of its own or will it
remain a satellite to European and American innovations? Can discourses of modernism and
the critical reassessment of artistic forms be revised in such a way that they do not necessarily
flow through the metropoles of Europe? These questions are especially relevant to the display
and distribution of contemporary art, both in the opening of new marketing channels and in the
sharing of artistic visions with new audiences. The question of artistic modernism, as opposed to
the infrastructural question of modernity uncovers a variety of artistic, performative, and aesthetic
spaces that hide within and among the multiple modernities that mirror European art history.
Both African and Middle Eastern artists are similarly striving to catapult themselves from
local shows onto the stages of Paris, London, Berlin, and New York. Global artists compete
for the limited gallery space of European and American venues. Consequently, the artistic
exchange and dialogue break down. With the UAE’s excessive spending and investment in
modernization, these relations are beginning to drift. European-based artists have recently
begun to eye Dubai as a new market. As a stream of artists from the Middle East, Africa, and
elsewhere flow into Europe, the overflow spills back into the Middle East. But just as art may
short circuit the historical time of modernization, the exchange of art may usefully short-circuit
the geographic marketing streams contemporary art. The resurgence of movement along pre-
modern routes—such as the circulation of artists, art works, and artistic forms from Africa to
the Middle East and vice versa—may reawaken the critical of dialogue of modernism. This
new modernism might bypass the question of how emerging artists can acquire seats at the
European table. It produces, instead, an alternative feast in which Europe is not the primary chef.
References
Ali, Wijdan. 1989. Contemporary Art from the Muslim World. London: Scorpion Publishing
Ltd.
Al Qassemi, Sultan Sooud. 2009. “UAE’s Oneness.” In The Khaleej Times (June 13, 2009).
D’Heiland, Bo Tasle. 2009. Interview with authors. March 14, 2009. Dubai, UAE.
Haeri, Niloofar. 2003. Sacred Language, Ordinary People: Dilemmas of Culture and
Politics in Egypt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charles, Harrison. 1996. “Modernism.” In Critical Terms for Art History, edited by Robert
Nelson and Richard Shiff, pp. 142-155. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Fabian, Johannes. 1996. Remembering the Present: Painting and Popular History in Zaire.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jewsiewicki, Bogumil. 1991. “Painting in Zaire: From the Invention of the West to the
Representation of Social Self.” In Vogel, Susan, ed., Africa Explores: Twentieth Century
African Art, pp. 130-151. New York: Center for African Art.
— 1995. Chéri Samba: The Hybridity of Art. Québec: Galérie Amrad African Art
Publications.
Jules-Rosette, Benetta. 1984. The Messages of Tourist Art: An African Semiotic System in
Comparative Perspective. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.
Kasfir, Sidney L. 1999 Contemporary African Art. New York: Thames and Hudson, Inc.
Lima, Marcelo. 2009. Interview with authors. February 26, 2009. Dubai, UAE.
Lopardo, Roberto. 2009. Interview with authors. February 26, 2009. Dubai, UAE.
Kreamer, Christine Mullen, Mary Nooter Roberts, Elizabeth Harney, and Allyson Purpura,
editors. 2007. Inscribing Meaning: Writing and Graphic Systems in Africa. Milan: Five
Continents Editions.
Njami, Simon, ed. 2005. Africa Remix: Contemporary Art of a Continent. London: Hatje
Cantz Publishers.
Nouri, Kouroush. 2009. Interview with authors. February 4, 2009. Dubai, UAE.
Porter, Venetia and Saeb Eigner. 2008. “Word into Art: Artists of the Modern Middle East.
Dubai 2008” London: The British Museum Press.
Preziozi, Donald. 1996. “Collecting/Museums.” In Critical Terms for Art History, edited
by Robert Nelson and Richard Shiff, pp. 281-291. Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press.
Shabout, Nada M. 1999. “Modern Arab Art and the Metamorphosis of the Arabic Letter.”
Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Texas at Arlington.
— 2007. Modern Arab Art: Formation of Arab Aesthetics. Gainesville: University Press
of Florida.