Attorney General Pam Bondi Ethics Complaint No. 13-201 Dismissed

MorganR.
Bentley
Chair
MichelleAnchors
MatthewF. Carlucci
I.MartinFord
Tom Freeman
SusanHorovitzMaurer
LindaMcKeeRobison
StanleyM.Weston
StateofFlorida
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O.Drawer15709
Tallahassee,Florida32317-5709
325JohnKnoxRoad
BuildingE,Suite200
Tallahassee,Florida32303
"A Public Office is a Public Trust"
December17,2013
VirlindiaDoss
Executive Director
C.ChristopherAnderson,III
General CounseV
Deputy Executive Director
(850)488-7864Phone
(850)488-3077(FAX)
www.ethics.state.fl.us
CERTIFIEDMAIL
RETURNRECEIPTREQUESTED
TheHonorablePamelaBondi
PL-O1,TheCapitol
Confidential
Tallahassee,FL 32399-1050
RE: ComplaintNo. 13-201,InrePAMELAJOBONDI
DearAttorneyGeneralBondi:
Theabove-captionedcomplaint,recentlyreceivedintheofficeoftheCommissiononEthics,is
beingtransmittedtoyoupursuanttotherequirementsofSection112.324,FloridaStatutes. This
officewillforwardallfuture correspondenceinthismattertoyouattheabove-listedmailing
addressunlessotherwisenotifiedofachangeinyouraddress. Thistransmittalisaroutine
administrativerequirementwhichshouldnotbeconstruedasanapproval,disapproval,or
judgment of the complaint, either as toits terminology or merits.
Pleasenotethatthiscomplaint,aswellasallof theCommission'sproceedingsandrecords
relatingtothecomplaint,remainconfidentialeitheruntilyoumakeawrittenrequesttothe
Commissionthatsuchrecordsbemadepublicoruntilthecomplaintreachesastagein the
Commission'sproceedingswhereitbecomespublic. Unlesswereceiveawrittenwaiverof
confidentialityfromyou,ourofficeisnotfreetoreleaseanydocumentsortocommentonthis
complainttomembersofthepublicorthepress,solongasthecomplaintremainsina
confidentialstage. TheCommission'sproceduresonconfidentialitydonotgoverntheactionsof
thecomplainantortherespondent.
Thefollowinginformationissubmittedtoaidyouinunderstandingthereviewthatacomplaint
maygothroughundertheCommission'srules. Thefirststageinourcomplaintprocessisa
determinationof whethertheallegationsof thecomplaintarelegallysufficient,thatis,whether
they indicate a possible violationof any law over which the Commission has jurisdiction. If the
complaintisfoundnottobelegallysufficient,theCommissionwillorderthatthecomplaintbe
dismissedwithoutinvestigationandallrecordsrelatingtothecomplaintwillbecomepublicat
thattime.
PAMELA JO BONDI
Page 2
December 17, 2013
If the complaint is legally sufficient but pertains solely to allegations of errors or omissions in
financial disclosure forms, a determination will be made as to whether the errores) or
omissions(s) are significant to investigate. If the error(s) or omissions(s) are determined to be
minor or inconsequential, you will be so notified and will be given 30 days in which to correct
the error(s) or omission(s). If the correction is made, the complaint will be dismissed. Ifno
correction is made, the complaint will advance to the next step in the process.
If the complaint is found to be legally sufficient, a preliminary investigation will be undertaken
by the investigative staff of the Commission. The next stage of the Commission's proceedings
involves the preliminary investigation ofthe complaint and a decision by the Commission of
whether there is probable cause to believe that there has been a violation of any of the ethics
laws. If the complaint is investigated, you and the complainant will be given an opportunity to
speak with the investigator. You also will be sent a copy of our investigative report prior to any
action by the Commission and will be given the opportunity to respond to the report in writing.
If the Commission finds that there is no probable cause to believe that there has been a violation
of the ethics laws, the complaint will be dismissed and will become public at that time.
If the Commission finds that there is probable cause to believe there has been a violation of the
ethics laws, the complaint becomes public and enters the last stage of proceedings, which
requires that the Commission decide whether the law actually was violated aIld, if so, whether a
penalty should be recommended. At this stage, you have the right to request a public hearing
(trial) at which evidence would be presented, or the Commission may order that such a hearing
be held. Public hearings usually are held in or near the area where the alleged violation
occurred.
You are entitled to be represented by legal counsel during our proceedings. Upon written
request, documents and notices regarding the complaint will be provided to your attorney.
If you are unfamiliar with the ethics laws and the Commission's responsibilities, I encourage you
to access our website at www.ethics.state.fl.us. where you will find publications, rules, and other
information. If there are any questions concerning this complaint or the procedures being
followed by the Commission, please feel free to contact Ms. Kaye Starling, our Complaint
Coordinator, at (850) 488-7864.

Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Neil J. Gillespie Complainant
VIA UPS No. 1Z64589FNY93689732 December 9, 2013
Virlindia A. Doss, Executive Director
Florida Commission on Ethics
325 John Knox Road
Building E, Suite 200
Tallahassee, FL 32303
Dear Ms. Doss:
Please find enclosed seven (7) sworn complaints for Misuse of Public Position, 112.313(6) F.S.
in the fraud or impairment of my Petition No. 12-7747 to the U.S. Supreme Court, a legitimate
government activity, 18 U.S.C. 371, by Attorney General Pam Bondi and others in her employ,
who conspired with Respondent David A. Rowland, General Counsel for Respondent Thirteenth
Judicial Circuit Florida, and other Respondents and non-respondents, in a conspiracy against my
rights, 18 U.S.C. 241, to deprive me of rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. 242.
Attorney General Bondi et al are currently engaged in ongoing Misuse of Public Position in
Petition No. 13-7280 to the U.S. Supreme Court, where The Florida Bar is a cross-party for
political persecution of me in retaliation for my Petition No. 12-7747 to the Government for a
redress of grievances protected by the First Amendment. Petition No. 13-7280 calls into question
the constitutionality of the federal HECM reverse mortgage statute, and eight Florida statutes.
Please find enclosed sworn complaints for Misuse of Public Position for the following:
1. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General of Florida
2. Diana R. Esposito, the Chief-Assistant Attorney General, Tampa
3. Kenneth V. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa
4. Valerie Williford, employee of the Office of Attorney General, Tampa
5. Laura Martin, employee of the Office of Attorney General, Tampa
6. David A. Rowland, General Counsel, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Florida
7. Sandra Burge, employee of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Florida
Petition No. 12-7747 was denied February 19, 2013. Rehearing was denied April 15, 2013.
In May 2013 I obtained 323 pages of public records from the Attorney General showing
Respondent David Rowland concocted with others a fraud to falsely portray to Asst. AG
Kenneth Wilson that I did not serve Rowland my petition as I certified under S.Ct. Rule 29.
Wilson claims he relied on Rowlands fraud, and did not submit a brief in opposition due the
Supreme Court January 14, 2013. Without the Attorney Generals response, I was denied due
process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court relies on opposition
briefs as part of its adversarial process to litigate and decide a petition. Floridas opposition brief
was due January 14, 2013 but was impaired by fraud. AG Bondi did not respond for Florida, thus
no opposition brief was distributed for the Supreme Courts Conference February 15, 2013.
Virlindia A. Doss, Executive Director December 9, 2013
Florida Commission on Ethics Page - 2
It now appears certain that Attorney General Bondi, AAG Esposito, AAG Wilson, Ms. Williford
and Ms. Martin were co-conspirators with Mr. Rowland all along. Attorney General Bondi,
AAG Esposito, AAG Wilson, Ms. Williford and Ms. Martin created with a corrupt intent the
following false public documents in furtherance of the fraud or impairment of Petition 12-7747:
Letter dated May 18, 2012 of Asst. Attorney General Diana Esposito sent through the U.S.
mail to me about Eleventh Circuit docket number 12-11028-B, an appeal of District Court
case 5:11-cv-00539, that stated a material falsehood, ...your initial complaint was dismissed
for, among other reasons, failure to make service of process on any of the defendants. Since
that is the Order of the Court.... Tellingly no such order exists in case 5:11-cv-00539.

Synopsis of Major Issues, AG Case #Tampa Monitor, a false public record corruptly created
by AAG Esposito, AAG Wilson, Ms. Williford and Ms. Martin to impair Petition 12-7747.

The Office of Attorney General is very familiar with this matter since at least 2007.

Attorney General Bill McCollum responded in December 2007 The Attorney General's
Office does not have jurisdiction in this matter with Ryan Christopher Rodems and Barker,
Rodems & Cook, P.A. who stole $7,143 from my contingency fee case.

In 2010 I made a complaint to McCollum under the 19th Statewide Prosecution Office
because this matter involves racketeering in several different circuits: Hillsborough (13),
Marion (5th), Alachua (8th), Leon (2nd) and now Pinellas (6th) with Eugene Castagliuolo.
The Attorney General has my federal complaint in its files since 2010 which I forgot about
until Pam Bondis Office provided me hundreds of pages of my filings with the AG.

Pam Bondi is well aware of this case too and Judge Martha Cook, and Floridas first
Husband and Husband vested mortgage to benefit a wealthy banker who bailed-out Cooks
community bank that was about to fail in 2009 under FDIC order. Unfortunately Judge Cook
is for sale. Petition 13-7280 shows honest services fraud with Judge Cook and Mr. Rodems,
as recently held in U.S. v Terry, pages 35-37 in my petition, and accompany this complaint.

Letter dated January 8, 2013 of Asst. Attorney General Wilson to Mr. Rowland, a false
public record corruptly created as part of a conspiracy to impair Petition 12-7747, and sent
by email January 8, 2013 at 12.52 PM to Mr. Rowland and Ms. Burge.
Sandra Burge, a paralegal assistant to David Rowland of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit,
corruptly created and sent false public email December 20, 2012 at 12.51 PM to AAG Esposito,
Cc to Mr. Rowland and Chris Nauman (Asst. General Counsel, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit), a
falsehood representing that I did not serve my petition or appendices as claimed, and in
furtherance of the fraud or impairment of Petition 12-7747.
My enclosed affidavit to the United Nations, filed in the U.S. Supreme Court in 13, 7280 shows
how the conspiracy worked between the Attorney General and the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit.
Public records show that between September 27, 2012 and December 28, 2012, the persons
shown below knowingly and corruptly created a false official record for the state of Florida, the
Synopsis of Major Issues, AG Case #Tampa Monitor.
Diana R. Esposito, Chief-Assistant Attorney General of Florida, Tampa, Bar ID 16523
Author, Synopsis of Major Issues, AG Case #Tampa Monitor 12/20/2012 01:53:45 PM
Kenneth V. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, Tampa, Bar ID 45212
Author, Synopsis of Major Issues, AG Case #Tampa Monitor 12/20/2012 02:42:13 PM
Laura Martin, author, Synopsis of Major Issues. May be employee of Thirteenth Circuit
Synopsis of Major Issues, AG Case #Tampa Monitor 09/27/2012 03:16:26 PM
Valerie Williford, author, Synopsis of Major Issues, AG Case #Tampa Monitor 12/28/2012
Synopsis of Major Issues, AG Case #Tampa Monitor 12/28/2012 10:48:19 AM
The Attorney Generals Synopsis of Major Issues states the following in general
1
.
Plaintiff sued his former attorney and law firm in the 13th judicial Circuit Court. He lost
by summary judgment. He now brings this claim against his former attorney and law firm
and all the judges who had any involvement in his 13th Judicial Circuit Case. Notably, he
had until October 29, 2010 to file an amended complaint and has not done so. He filed a
voluntary dismissal as to his former attorney and law firm. The Judges and the 13th
Judicial Circuit have not been served.
The Attorney Generals Synopsis of Major Issues makes false statements:
He lost by summary judgment. He now brings this claim against his former attorney and
law firm and all the judges who had any involvement in his 13th Judicial Circuit Case.
Case No. 5:10-cv-503 was filed before He lost by summary judgment, and before Judge
Cook and Mr. Rodems engaged in honest services fraud, and used the mail to carry out a
scheme or artifice to defraud another, 18 U.S.C. 1341, of the intangible right of honest
services. 18 U.S.C. 1346.
Case No. 5:10-cv-503 brings claims against one former attorney, Robert W. Bauer, one
opposing counsel, Ryan Christopher Rodems, and two former law firms, Barker, Rodems &
Cook, P.A., and the Law Office of Robert W. Bauer, P.A.

1
There is no mention of my second case which shows racketeering, and failure of The Florida
Bar to discipline Robert W. Bauer, a Bar LRS referral, who charged me $31,863 in fees that only
benefited him, then he switched sides and joined Mr. Rodems to undermine my Bar complaints,
and Petition 12-7747.
Case No. 5:10-cv-503 does not make claims against all the judges who had any involvement
in his 13th Judicial Circuit Case. No claim was made against Hillsborough Judge Richard
Nielsen, the first trial judge. No claim was made against Judge James Arnold, the last judge.
The Attorney Generals Synopsis of Major Issues makes a false or misleading statement:
Notably, he had until October 29, 2010 to file an amended complaint and has not done so.
He filed a voluntary dismissal as to his former attorney and law firm.
In Case No. 5:10-cv-503, voluntary dismissal was made in lieu of an amended Complaint,
and accepted by the Court, See PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS
TO DEFENDANTS RODEMS & BRC IN LIEU OF AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 22)
The Attorney Generals Synopsis of Major Issues makes a false or misleading statement:
The Judges and the 13th Judicial Circuit have not been served.
In Case No. 5:10-cv-503, The Judges and the 13th Judicial Circuit were served under Rule
4(d) waving service, a last ditch effort when clerks will not issue summons for judges. This is a
detailed matter, Deputy U.S. Marshall Devall admitted this is an issue. In Alachua County, Sonja
Mullerin, a former lawyer, filed a civil RICO lawsuit in Gainesville but the District Clerk would
not issue summons for judges. See Consolidated Notice of Filing Service of Process (Proposed)
page 1, 155 pages online http://www.scribd.com/doc/172064977/
Currently the Attorney General will not provide public records for Eugene Castagliuolo, a
former AAG who went into private practice many years ago who represented me in 2011 and
should not be practicing due to mental health issues, in my opinion. In 2012 Castagliuolo
wrongly sued Florida attorney Jackson K. Hilliard in Pinellas County, initially in small claims
court. The case was later transferred to county court. Mr. Castagliulo was unable to state a cause
of action for himself, and the matter and others warranted a Rule 3-5.2(a) Emergency Suspension
in my view.
Political Persecution by The Florida Bar
I am being persecuted by The Florida Bar, U.S. Judge William Terrell Hodges, and Florida
attorneys Ryan Christopher Rodems and Eugene P. Castagliuolo, in retaliation for petitioning for
a redress of grievances in Petition No. 12-7747 to the U.S. Supreme Court. Also see Petition No.
SC11-1622 for writ of mandamus, Florida Supreme Court, January 9, 2012.
Specific examples of current and ongoing political persecution of me include:
1. The Florida Bar for an open investigation of me for Unlicensed Practice of Law (UPL).
2. Mr. Rodems made the UPL complaint against me for representing myself and my interests.
3. Judge Hodges corruptly assisted McCalla Raymer in a wrongfully foreclosure of my home.
4. Mr. Castagliuolo ongoing threats to interfere with my Social Security disability income.
In a few days I plan to submit a Supplemental Brief on Misuse of Public Position and will
provide a copy on request, along with whatever else you require. Please find enclosed:
1. The docket in Petition 12-7747, and first page of Statement of the Case, appears at Exhibit 1.
2. The docket in Petition 13-7280, and first page of Statement of the Case, appears at Exhibit 2.
3. The cover page for the current Constitutional Challenge appendix appears at Exhibit 3.
4. Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie, Non-Cooperation of the Florida Attorney General, Exhibit 4.
5. Urgent Appeal to the United Nations for protection from political persecution. Exhibit 5.
6. My Affidavit to the UN, Fraud or Impairment of Petition No. 12-7747. Exhibit 6.
7. Synopsis of Major Issues, AG Case #Tampa Monitor. Exhibit 7.
8. Consolidated Notice of Filing Service of Process (Proposed). Exhibit 8.
9. Honest Services Fraud, Judge Cook and Mr. Rodems. Exhibit 9.
10. Letter of Bill McCollum November 7, 2007. Exhibit 10.
11. Letter of Bill McCollum November 5, 2010, re Statewide Grand Jury. Exhibit 11.
12. Letter of Diana Esposito May 18, 2012 to Neil Gillespie. Exhibit 12.
13. Letter of Kenneth Wilson January 8, 2013 to David Rowland. Exhibit 13.
14. Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie to the U.N., I have a well-founded fear of political persecution.
Department of Legal Affairs, Office of Civil Rights
Fla. Stat. 16.57, as amended in 2003, authorizes the Attorney General to investigate alleged
civil rights violations under chapter 760. Fla. Stat. 760.021, as added in 2003, provides that the
Attorney General may commence a civil action for damages, injunctive relief, civil penalties,
and other relief against any person or group perpetuating discriminatory practices. Any damages
recovered shall accrue to the injured party.
Neil J. Gillespie v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Florida et al, case no. 5:10-cv-503-WTH-(DAB)-
TBS, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, Ocala Division, is a civil rights lawsuit:
1. This lawsuit arises under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), 42
U.S.C., Chapter 126, Equal Opportunities for Individuals with Disabilities,...
Plaintiff also makes claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights,
and the following amendments to the Constitution of the United States: The Fifth and
VirlindiaA. Doss,ExecutiveDirector December9,2013
FloridaCommissiononEthics
Page- 6
FourteenthAmendmentsas toDueProcess;TheEightAmendmentasto Cruel&
UnusualPunishment;andtheFourteenthAmendmentasto EqualProtection. This
lawsuitalsobringsclaimsunderArticle 1, Section21 of theConstitutionoftheStateof
Florida,Accessto Courts; Article 1, Section 17of theConstitutionoftheStateof
Florida,ExcessivePunishments.ThisCourtis vestedwithoriginaljurisdictionunder28
U.S.C. 1331, 1343,andsupplementaljurisdictionoverthestatelawclaimspursuantto
28 U.S.C. 1367.NOTE: TheComplaintwasservedunderRule4(d)waiver. See
http://www.scribd.com!doc/172064977/Thirteenth-Judicial-Circuit-Service-of-Process-Appendix
TheAttorneyGeneralofFloridashouldhaveappearedinthismatter,andrepresentedme, not
triedto cover-upwrongdoing. Thiscasehasanumberofdisabilityissues. Iwillprovidemore
informationassoonaspossible.Thankyou.
N 11 J. Gilles 'e
8 92 SW 15thLoop
Ocala,Florida34481
Telephone: 352-854-7807
Email: neilgillespie@mfi.net
Enclosures
-------------------------------------
STATEOFFLORIDA
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O.DRAWER15709,TALLAHASSEE,FLORIDA 32317-5709
COMPLAINT
I. PERSON BRINGING COMPLAINT:
Neil J. Gillespie T I h
one
N b
er:
352-854-7807
N
arne: e ep urn _
Address:8092SW 115th Loop
C
t Ocala C
oun
t
y:
Marion Z C d
e:
34481
1 y: lp 0 _
2. PERSON AGAINST WHOM COMPLAINT IS BROUGHT:
Currentorformerpublicofficer,publicemployee,candidate,orlobbyist- pleaseuseonecomplaintform
foreachpersonyou wish tocomplainagainst:
Telephone 850-414-3300
TheCapitol PL-01, Office oftheAttorneyGeneral
ress:__-_- _
Add
C
t Tallahassee C Leon Z C d 32399-1050
1 y: ounty: lp 0 e: _
T
"tl f ill "t" h ld ht AttorneyGeneralofFlorida
1 eo 0 lceorposllon e orsoug : _
3. STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Please explain your complaint fully, either on the reverse side of this form or on additional sheets,
providinga detailed description ofthe facts and the actions oftheperson named above. Include relevant
dates and the names and addresses ofpersons whomyou believe may be witnesses. Ifyou believe that a
particular provision ofArticle II, Section 8, Florida Constitution (the Sunshine Amendment) orofPart
III, Chapter 112, Florida Statutes (the Code ofEthics for Public Officers and Employees) has been
violated, please statethe specific section(s). Pleasedo notattach copies oflengthydocuments; iftheyare
relevant,yourdescriptionofthemwillsuffice" Also,pleasedonotsubmitvideotapesoraudiotapes"
4. OATH STATEOFFLORIDA "
COUNTYOF _
this _
I, the person bringing this complaint, do
depose on oath or affirmation and say that
thefacts setforth in theforegoingcomplaint
and attachmentstheretoaretrueandcorrect
tothebestof myknowledgeand belief
S
CEFORM 50-EFF.4/2008
------------------------------------
STATEOFFLORIDA
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O. DRAWER15709,TALLAHASSEE,FLORIDA 82817-5709
COMPLAINT
1. PERSON BRINGING COMPLAINT:
NeilJ. Gillespie T I h N b 352-854-7807
N
arne: e ep one urn er: _
Address:8092SW115thLoop
C
at Ocala C t Marion
Z
" C d
0
34481
_
1 y: _-----_-----_-_ oun y: _
Ip e:
Currentorformerpublicofficer,publicemployee,candidate,orlobbyist- please useonecomplaintform
foreachpersonyouwishtocomplainagainst:
Diana R. Esposito, Chief-AssistantAttorneyGeneral T I h N b 813-233-2600,x110
Narne: ----_---_------ e ep one urn er: _
501 EastKennedyBlvd., Suite 1100,OfficeoftheAttorneyGeneral
ress: ---- _
Add
C
at Tampa C t Hillsborough C d 33602
1 y: oun y: ---
Z
"
0 - lp e:
T
"tl f ffi "t" h ld ht Chief-AssistantAttorneyGeneralTampa
1 eo 0 lceorposllon e orsoug : -
Please"explain your complaint fully, either on the reverse side of this form or on additional sheets,
providinga detailed description ofthe facts and the actions ofthe person named above" Include relevant
dates and the names and addresses ofpersons whom you believe may be witnesses. Ifyou believe that a
particular provision ofArticle II, Section 8, Florida Constitution (the Sunshine Amendment) or ofPart
III, Chapter 112, Florida Statutes (the Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees) has been
violated, pleasestatethe specific section(s). Pleasedo notattachcopies oflengthydocuments; iftheyare
relevant,yourdescriptionofthemwill suffice. Also,pleasedonotsubmitvideotapesoraudiotapes.
4. OATH
STATEOFFLORIDA
COUNTYOF
-------...;;------------
andattachmentstheretoaretrueandcorrect
tothebestofmyknowledgeandbelief
_
CE FORM 50-EFF.4/2008
------------------------------------
STATEOFFLORIDA
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P. o.DRAWER15709,TALLAHASSEE,FLORIDA 82817-5709
COMPLAINT
I. PERSON BRINGING COMPLAINT:
N
arne:
NeilJ. Gillespie
-_____________
Teleph
one
N
urn
b
er:
352-854-7807
_
Address:8092SW 115thLoop
C
t Ocala
-________
C t Marion Z
Ip
C d
e:
34481
1 y: oun y: 0 _
foreachpersonyouwish tocomplainagainst:
Kenneth V. Wilson, AssistantAttorneyGeneralTampa 813-233-2600
N
arne: TelephoneNumber: -_
501 EastKennedyBlvd., Civil Litigation Bureau, OfficeoftheAttorneyGeneral
ress: - _
Add
Hillsborough Z C d 33602
City:Tampa
C
oun
t
y: Ip 0 e: _
T
"tl f ill "t" h ld ht AssistantAttorneyGeneralTampa
1 eo 0 lceorposllon e orsoug : -
providinga detailed description ofthe facts and the actions oftheperson named above. Include relevant
dates and the names and addresses ofpersons whom you believe may be witnesses" Ifyou believe that a
violated, pleasestate thespecific section(s). Pleasedo notattach copies oflengthydocuments; iftheyare
relevant,yourdescriptionofthemwill suffice. Also,pleasedonotsubmitvideotapesoraudiotapes.
4. OATH
STATEOFFLORIDA ""\
COUNTYOF ~ . . . . . = . . ~ ~ ~ _
tothebestof myknowledgeandbelief
this-------..,e;-----
CEFORM50-EFF.4/2008
------------------------------------
STATEOFFLORIDA
COMMISSIONONETHICS
COMPLAINT
Neil J. Gillespie T I h N b 352-854-7807
Narne: ------------ e ep one urn er: _
C
t Ocala C t Marion Z C d 34481
I y: oun y: lp 0 e: _
ValerieWilliford 813-233-2600
N
arne: TelephoneNumber: - _
501 EastKennedyBlvd., Suite 1100,OfficeoftheAttorneyGeneral
Add
ress: --------- _
Hillsborough
C d City: Tampa 33602
C
oun
t
y: _
Z
lp 0 e: _
Titleof officeorpositionheldorsought: EmployeeoftheOfficeofAttorneyGeneral
providinga detailed description ofthe facts and the actions ofthe person named above. Include relevant
violated, pleasestatethespecific section(s). Pleasedo notattach copies oflengthydocuments; iftheyare
relevant,yourdescriptionofthemwillsuffice. Also,pleasedonotsubmitvideotapesoraudiotapes.
4. OATH
STATEOFFLORIDA \
COUNTYOF _
Sworpto(oraffirmeqJandsubscribedbeforeme
I, the person bringing this complaint, do this 'LQ dayof USh!..gtk.Qs:z-..-..:. ,
20 l3 liiit.le:r: L ,I!:'
thefacts setforth in theforegoingcomplaint (nameof personmlaJiiJ"11I!J.s!at.el;J;.en1:j
andattachmentstheretoare trueandcorrect
tothebestofmyknowledgeandbelief.
CE FORM50-EFF.4/2008
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
STATEOFFLORIDA
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P. O. DRAWER15709,TALLAHASSEE,FLORIDA 82817-5709
COMPLAINT
NeilJ. Gillespie T I h N b 352-854-7807
Narne: ---------------- e ep one urn er: _
C
t Ocala Marion Z C d 34481
I y: ---
C
oun
t
y: lp 0 e: _
Laura Martin 813 233 2600
N
ame:__- TelephoneNumber: - -
Address: 501 EastKennedyBlvd., Suite 1100,OfficeoftheAttorneyGeneral
City: Tampa
C
oun
t
y: lp 0 e: _
Titleof officeorpositionheldorsought: EmployeeoftheOfficeofAttorneyGeneral
providinga detailed description ofthefacts and the actions ofthe person named above. Include relevant
violated, please statethespecific section(s). Pleasedo not attach copies oflengthydocuments; iftheyare
4. OATH
STATEOFFLORIDA
COUNTYOF
to(oraffirmed) andsubscribedbeforeme
I, the person bringing this complaint, do this dayof ,
20 \3 ,by ;j. .
(name fperson
------------------------------------
this
20 ?2
(,--tk
,by
dayof
l0iA-k
(name

:r. ,u...@'?PC.-e
ofRe
,
STATEOFFLORIDA
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O.DRAWER 15709,TALLAHASSEE,FLORIDA 82817-5709
COMPLAINT
Narne: e ep one urn er: _
C
t Ocala C t Marion
Z
C d 34481
1 y: ----___ oun y: _ Ip 0 e: _
DavidA. Rowland, GeneralCounsel T I h N b (813)272-6843
N
arne: e ep one urn er: _
800 E. TwiggsStreet, Suite603, Legal Department,ThirteenthJudicialCircuitOfFlorida
ress: _
Add
City:Tampa
C
oun
t
y: Ip 0 e: _
T
tl f ill t h ld ht GeneralCounsel,ThirteenthJudicialCircuitOfFlorida
1 eo 0 lceorposllon e orsoug : -_
providinga detailed description ofthefacts and the actions oftheperson named above. Include relevant
dates and the names and addresses ofpersons whom you believe may be witnesses. Ifyou believe that a
violated,pleasestatethespecific section(s). Pleasedo notattach copies oflengthydocuments; iftheyare
4. OATH
STATEOFFLORIDA
COUNTYOF
Swornto(oraffirmed) andsubscribedbeforeme

OFCOMPLAINANT
CEFORM50-EFF.4/2008
------------------------------------
STATEOFFLORIDA
COMMISSIONONETHICS
COMPLAINT
Narne: -------_______ e ep one urn er: _
C
t Ocala
--___________
C t Marion Z
Ip
C d 34481
1 y: __ oun y: 0 e: _
TelephoneNumber: (813)272-6843
800 E. Twiggs Street, Suite603, Legal Department,ThirteenthJudicial CircuitOfFlorida
Add
ress: ---------- _
City:Tampa
Hillsborough
C d 33602
C
oun
t
y:
Ip 0 e: -
_
Z
__ __
T
tl f ffi t h ld ht ParalegalAssistant,ThirteenthJudicial CircuitOfFlorida
1 eo 0 lceorposllon e orsoug : --- _
providinga detailed description ofthe facts and the actions ofthe person named above. Include relevant
violated, please statethe specific section(s). Pleasedo notattachcopies oflengthydocuments; iftheyare
4. OATH
STATEOFFLORIDA
COUNTYOF_...-.._A_tlL_"""_o _
Swornto(oraffirmed)andsubscribedbeforeme
I, the person bringing this complaint, do this tD.... dayof L- ,
20 ,by f..) eu- :r: LL$ t? l6
thefacts setforth in theforegoingconlplaint (nameof personmakin statement)
andattachmentstheretoaretrueandcorrect
ignatureof NotaryP c- StateofFlorida)
tothebestofmyknowledgeandbelief.
III


No. 12-7747
Title:
Neil J . Gillespie, Petitioner
v.
Thirteenth J udicial Circuit of Florida, et al.
Docketed: December 14, 2012
Linked with 12A215
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Nos.: (12-11028-B)
Decision Date: J uly 13, 2012
Rule 12.4
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Aug 13 2012 Application (12A215) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari
from October 11, 2012 to December 10, 2012, submitted to J ustice Thomas.
Sep 13 2012 Application (12A215) granted by J ustice Thomas extending the time to file until
December 10, 2012.
Dec 10 2012 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis filed. (Response due J anuary 14, 2013)
Dec 20 2012 Waiver of right of respondents Rayan Christopher Rodems; and Barker,
Rodems & Cook, P.A. to respond filed.
J an 24 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Feb 13 2013 Supplemental brief of petitioner Neil J . Gillespie filed. (Distributed)
Feb 19 2013 Petition DENIED.
Mar 18 2013 Petition for Rehearing filed.
Mar 27 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 12, 2013.
Apr 15 2013 Rehearing DENIED.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Peti ti oner:
Neil J . Gillespie 8092 SW 115th Loop (352) 854-7807
Ocala, FL 34481
neilgillespie@mfi.net
Party name: Neil J . Gillespie
Attorneys for Respondents:
Ryan Christopher Rodems Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A. (813)-489-1001
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-7747.htm
1
Counsel of Record 501 East Kennedy Blvd., Suite 790
Tampa, FL 33602
Party name: Rayan Christopher Rodems; and Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A.
4
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
My name is Neil J. Gillespie, the petitioner appearing pro se, a law-abiding consumer of
legal and court services affecting interstate commerce, among other things. (Gillespie).
On the morning of September 28, 2010 Gillespie needed the assistance and protection of
an Article III federal judge, the Hon. Wm. Terrell Hodges, and the Ocala Fla. U.S. District Court,
in a 5 year-old Fla. state court lawsuit gone bad with Ryan Christopher Rodems
1
, of Barker,
Rodems & Cook, that cheated Gillespie in a prior case. The Fla. suit was to recover the money.
Gillespies Complaint (Doc.1) in 5:10-cv-00503 pled violations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), and depravation of rights under section 1983 in the Florida lawsuit.
Unfortunately Gillespie did not get federal assistance or protection;
2
things got a worse
3
.
Mr. Rodems was somehow representing the State of Florida June 21, 2011 and moved to
dismiss Gillespies federal claims against the State of Florida which he assigned to himself and
his partners. But only the Florida AG may represent the State of Florida in a federal court action.

1
The Florida Bar opened complaint no. 2013-10,271 (13E) against Mr. Rodems Sep-13, 2012.
2
Respondent Judge Martha Cook held Gillespie in civil contempt with writ of bodily attachment
during an ex parte hearing, where she made a false record that he elected to leave. Fortunately
the bailiff, Deputy C.E. Brown, told his commander that Judge Cook ordered Gillespie to leave.
This was after Gillespie provided her a copy of the Complaint in 5:10-cv-503, filed hours before.
Mr. Rodems got a warrant to arrest Gillespie on the pretext of a court-ordered deposition after
the case was closed and on appeal. In 2008 Respondent Judge James Barton awarded $11,550 to
Mr. Rodems in attorney-fee sanctions, blaming Gillespie for Mr. Rodems earlier misconduct
and disruption of the tribunal. Gillespie was later incompetently represented by Respondent
Robert Bauer, at a cost of $31,863, referred from the Fla. Bar. His 2d Bar complaint is enclosed.
3
The public defender was appointed to represent Gillespie June 1, 2011 at a civil contempt
hearing, but the judge relieved the defender at the hearing and immediately entered an order to
arrest Gillespie. For twenty-one days law enforcement sought Gillespie, who was at home with
the blinds closed working on his appeal. Day after day the sheriff came pounding on the door
looking to arrest Gillespie. On June 3, 2011 Gillespie hired attorney Eugene P. Castagliuolo off
Craigslist to prepare for the deposition, but that was a disaster, and the Bar opened a complaint.
Petition No. 12-7747, SCOTUS

No. 13-7280
Title:
Neil J . Gillespie, Petitioner
v.
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., et al.
Docketed: November 8, 2013
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Nos.: (13-11585)
Decision Date: J une 12, 2013
Rehearing
Denied:
J uly 25, 2013
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 23 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2013)
Nov 18 2013 Waiver of right of respondent The Florida Bar to respond filed.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Peti ti oner:
Neil J . Gillespie 8092 SW 115th Loop (352) 854-7807
Ocala, FL 34481
neilgillespie@mfi.net
Party name: Neil J . Gillespie
Attorneys for Respondents:
Bridget Smitha Greenberg & Traurig, P.A. (850) 521-8570
101 East College Ave.
Tallahassee, FL 32301
Party name: The Florida Bar
2
6
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
My name is Neil Gillespie, the petitioner reluctantly appearing pro se
1
, henceforth in the
first person, age 57, a law-abiding, indigent, disabled single man, a surviving reverse mortgage
borrower
2
, and homeowner in a 55+ community in Ocala Florida. This petition is to save my
home from a disputed foreclosure
3
of a Home Equity Conversion Mortgage
4
or HECM, a FHA
5
reverse mortgage program administered by the Secretary, United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development (Secretary or HUD). My homes value is $74,730 and falling.
The mortgage payoff balance is $114,889. The property is underwater by $40,159. A HECM
cannot be refinanced. A ruling January 4, 2013 in Bennett v. Donovan held in part:
HUD itself has the capability to provide complete relief to the lenders and mortgagors alike,
which eliminates the uncertainty of third-party action that would otherwise block standing.
I bear witness to the uncertainty of third-party action, which here includes political
persecution by The Florida Bar, U.S. Judge William Terrell Hodges, and Florida attorneys Ryan
Christopher Rodems and Eugene P. Castagliuolo, in retaliation for my Petition No. 12-7747 for
writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. Current political persecution of me includes:

1
I was a client of Community Legal Services of Mid-Fla. which provides legal advice, but not
foreclosure representation. I paid a $25 Florida Bar referral fee to Gregory D. Jones, Esq. but he
has not responded to my disability accommodation request, or consulted with me on UPL.
2
I am one of three (3) HECM borrowers, with brother Mark Gillespie, and mother Penelope
Gillespie, whose death September 16, 2009 Plaintiff claims is grounds to accelerate the debt.
3
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Neil J. Gillespie, et al., Marion County Florida, Fifth
Judicial Circuit, No. 42-2013CA-000115-AXXX-XX; removed February 4, 2013 to U.S. District
Court, Ocala Division, Middle District Florida, No. 5:13-cv-00058-WTH-PRL; U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 13-11585-B; real party Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A.
4
12 U.S.C. 1715z20 - Insurance of home equity conversion mortgages for elderly
homeowners, and 24 C.F.R. Part 206, Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Insurance.
5
The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) is a United States government agency.
Petition No. 13-7280, SCOTUS
Petition No: 13-7280
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
____________________
NEIL J. GILLESPIE - PETITIONER
vs.
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC, ET AL - RESPONDENTS
________________________
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
U.S. ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APPEAL No. 13-11585
______________________
SEPARATE VOLUME APPENDIX
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
This petition draws into question the constitutionality of certain Florida Statutes:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/184195508/Petition-13-7280-FL-Challenge-28-USC-2403-b
1. Constitutional challenge, Fla. Stat., sec. 454.021 Attorneys; admission to practice law;
Supreme Court to govern and regulate.
2. Constitutional challenge, Fla. Stat., sec. 25.382 State courts system.
3. Constitutional challenge, Fla. Stat., sec. 43.20 Judicial Qualifications Commission.
4. Constitutional challenge, Fla. Stat., sec. 43.291 Judicial nominating commissions.
5. Constitutional challenge, Fla. Stat., sec. 38.01 et seq., Disqualification of judges
6. Constitutional challenge, Fla. Stat., sec. 57.105, award attorneys fees against pro se.
7. Constitutional challenge, Fla. Stat., sec. 27.52, require counsel in all legal proceedings
8. Constitutional challenge, Fla. Stat., sec. 934.01 et seq., Security of Communications
3
Petition No: 13-7280
IN THE
____________________
VS.
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL - RESPONDENTS
________________________
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI - C.A.11 13 - 11585-B
______________________
Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie
Notice of Non-Cooperation of the Florida Attorney General
______________________
I, Neil J. Gillespie, under oath, testify as follows:
1. My name is Neil J. Gillespie. I am over 18 years old. I am the Petitioner reluctantly
appearing pro se, in forma paupers, in this Petition No. 13-7280, writ of certiorari, SCOTUS.
2. The Florida Attorney General is an elected cabinet official of the Executive Branch who
serves as the chief legal officer of the state of Florida, a position of public trust created by the
Florida Constitution, Article IV, Section 4(b), and authorized by 16.01 et seq., Florida Statutes.
3. The current Attorney General is Pamela Jo Bondi who took office on January 4, 2011,
and swore to support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States
and of the State of Florida [Fla. Const. Art II 5(b)], and is by virtue of that position of trust an
officer and employee of state government, responsible for lawfully performing and discharging
4
her duties without bias, favoritism, extortion, improper influence, personal self enrichment, self-
dealing, concealment, or conflict of interest. Her term will expire on January 6, 2015.
4. I served my corrected Petition No. 13-7280 on the Attorney General as shown on the
attached Rule 29 Proof of Service (Exhibit 1), for the state of Florida, and,
Constitutional Challenge, 28 U.S.C. 2403(b) may apply (not certified)
Fla. Stat., sec. 454.021 Attorneys; admission to practice law; Supreme Court to
govern and regulate, etc., etc.
The corrected Petition No. 13-7280 was delivered November 6, 2013, signed by J Moon at
9.21 A.M. shown by the attached U.P.S. Proof of Delivery (Exhibit 2), to,
813 LAKE BRADFORD RD
TALLAHASSEE, FL, US 32304
This is a different address than is advertised by the Attorney General, which is
Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi
Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
5. On October 29, 2013 my email sent to the Attorney General at ag@myfloridalegal.com
was returned undeliverable with this error message: (Exhibit 3)
The following message to <ag@myfloridalegal.com> was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 554-'Mail for ag@myfloridalegal.com rejected for policy easons.'
6. On November 4, 2013 I made a written request the Attorney General: (Exhibit 4).
This is a demand for the Attorney Generals email address for service of court documents
required by Rule 2.516, Florida Rules Judicial Administration, or any other applicable
state or federal constitution, statute, rule or case holding. Previously I made this request
to Leslie Jacobs November 1, 2013 by email and did not get a response.
Please note that changes Effective July 1, 2013 to U.S. Supreme Court rule 29.3 requires:
"An electronic version of the document shall also be transmitted to all other
parties at the time of filing or reasonably contemporaneous therewith, unless the
party filing the document is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis or the
electronic service address of the party being served is unknown and not
identifiable through reasonable efforts."
This is a link to the U.S. Supreme Courts Press Release April 29, 2013, revised version
of the Rules of the Court. http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013revisedrules.pdf
This is a demand for the name and office address of the person, however designated, for
service of process to the Attorney General for the state of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
2403(b), constitutionality of any statute of that State affecting the public interest is
drawn in question.
This is a demand for the name and office address of the person, however designated, for
service of process to the Attorney General for the state of Florida pursuant to Chapter 48,
Florida Statutes, Process and Service of Process, or any other applicable state or federal
constitution, statute, rule or case holding.
Time is of the essence. Thank you.
7. I received a response by email from Diana R. Esposito, Chief-Assistant Attorney
General, Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:11 PM: (exhibit 5)
Dear Mr. Gillespie, I just received your letter of November 12, 2013 requesting a
response about "Service of Court Documents." That is a legal question which is not a
request for a public document and since there are many different situations in which
service of process is deemed sufficient and when it is not, you are asking a legal question
which I cannot answer. (I will however tell you that a UPS delivery and signature, in
most instances, does not constitute "service of process.")
If you have any specific documents you would like me to obtain for you, please let me
know, otherwise I don't think I can be of any assistance to you.
Regards,
Diana R. Esposito
Chief-Assistant Attorney General
Civil Litigation Bureau
Office of the Attorney General
501 E. Kennedy Blvd, Suite 1100
Tampa, FL 33602
Tel: 813-233-2600, x110
Fax: 813-233-2886[attachment "Letter to AG Bondi Nov-04-2013.pdf" deleted by Diana
Esposito/OAG]
8. I responded to Ms. Esposito Wednesday, November 13, 2013 4:12 PM: (exhibit 5)
Dear Ms. Esposito:
Kindly provide what I requested in the attached letter. It was not a public records request.
1. The Attorney General's email address for service of court documents required by Rule
2.516, Florida Rules Judicial Administration
2. The name and office address of the person, however designated, for service of process
to the Attorney General for the state of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2403(b),
constitutionality of any statute of that State affecting the public interest is drawn in
question.
3. The name and office address of the person, however designated, for service of process
to the Attorney General for the state of Florida pursuant to Chapter 48, Florida Statutes,
Process and Service of Process, or any other applicable state or federal constitution,
statute, rule or case holding.
FYI - United Parcel Service is "a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3
calendar days" within the meaning of U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29. The U.S. Supreme
Court has accepted UPS service from me in Petition No. 12-7747 and Petition No. 13-
7280.
9. Ms. Esposito responded Wednesday, November 13, 2013 4:48 PM: (exhibit 5)
Dear Mr. Gillespie,
If you don't have a public records request, I'm afraid we cannot assist you. I respectfully
request that you take the Office of the Attorney General, myself, Kenneth Wilson and
Attorney General Bondi off your mailing list concerning your case against Reverse
Mortgage Solutions and your claims against Mr. Rodems or other attorneys because our
office is not a party of record in those matters and it is an expense you do not have to
incur. In the future, if you have a public records request, you may direct that to my
attention and I will do my best to respond.
Respectfully,
Diana R. Esposito
Tampa, FL 33602
Tel: 813-233-2600, x110
Fax: 813-233-2886
10. On information and belief, the Florida Attorney General has a duty to provide a valid
email address and a valid street address for service of court documents in this petition, but has
failed or refused to provide the infornlation.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
I solemnly swear, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing facts, upon personal
knowledge, and information and belief, are true, correct, and complete, so help me God.
Dated this 15th day of November 2013.
er, a non-lawyer reluctantly appearing pro se
No: _______________________
IN THE
____________________
VS.
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL - RESPONDENTS
________________________
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Neil J Gillespie, do swear or declare that on this date, November 5, 2013, as required
by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the enclosed CORRECTED PETITION FOR A WRIT
OF CERTIORARI on each party to the above proceeding or that partys counsel, and on every
other person required to be served, by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery
within 3 calendar days. As to the Solicitor General of the United States only, I also served a Rule
39 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and Separate Volume Appendices provided in
PDF on CD due to indigence & disability. All other parties have the Rule 39 IFP and CD-ROM.
Note to Rule 29.3: Ordinarily, service on a party must be by a manner at least as expeditious as
the manner used to file the document with the Court. All service was made by United Parcel
Service (UPS). When sent within Florida, UPS delivers all shipments the next day regardless of
the type of service requested, other than shipments sent on Friday. Any UPS shipment shown on
this Proof of Service can be tracked by anyone using the UPS tracking numbers shown.
The names and addresses of those served are as follows:
1. President Jimmy Carter Request for Observer,
The Carter Center Denied, see enclosed
One Copenhill correspondence. Only
453 Freedom Parkway the enclosed letters
Atlanta, GA 30307 were served today.
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP292667067
2. United States of America, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Solicitor General of the United States
Department of Justice, Room 5614 Party: Defendant HUD
950 Pennsylvania Ave., N. W. Constitutional Challenge
Washington, DC 20530-0001 (see below)
Telephone:
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FNW90449483
1
Rule 29 Proof of Service, corrected petition for writ of certiorari, in forma pauperis, U.S.
Supreme Court, November 5, 2013, Neil J. Gillespie v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. et al.
Page - 2
Constitutional Challenge 28 U.S.C. 2403(a) (not certified) 12 U.S.C. 1715z20
- Insurance of home equity conversion mortgages for elderly homeowners
3. Colleen Murphy Davis, Assistant United States Attorney, Party: Defendant HUD
U.S. Attorney's Office, Middle District of Florida
400 North Tampa Street, Suite 3200
Tampa, FL 33602
Telephone: 813-274-6000
Email: USAFLM.State.Foreclosures@usdoj.gov (also served by email, Rule 29.3)
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP193126294
4. Gabriela Knaul, Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
8-14 Avenue de la Paix Urgent Appeal: Protection from Political
1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland Persecution; Request for Observer
Fax: +41 22 917 9006
Email: SRindependenceJL@ohchr.org (Also served by email, Rule 29.3)
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589F0493961507
5. Shuaib Chalklen, Special Rapporteur on Disability United Nations Enable
Secretariat for the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
@ Department of Economic and Social Affairs
United Nations, S-2906
New York, NY 10017 Urgent Appeal: Protection from Political
United States of America Persecution; Request for Observer
Fax: +1-917-367-5102
Email: enable@un.org (Also served by email, Rule 29.3)
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FNW94331119
6. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. (RMS) Plaintiff RMS
Danielle N. Parsons, Esq., McCalla Raymer, LLC For Plaintiff RMS
225 E. Robinson St. Suite 660
Orlando, FL 32801
Telephone: 407-674-1850
Email: dnp@mccallaraymer.com (Also served by email, Rule 29.3)
Email for service of court documents: MRService@mccallaraymer.com
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP191251125
7. Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi For the state of Florida
Office of Attorney General Constitutional Challenge
State of Florida (see below)
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Telephone: 850-414-3300
Rule 29 Proof of Service, corrected petition for writ of certiorari, in forma pauperis, U.S.
Supreme Court, November 5, 2013, Neil J. Gillespie v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. et al.
Page - 3
Email: pam.bondi@myfloridalegal.com (Also served by email, Rule 29.3)
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP191977539
Constitutional Challenge, 28 U.S.C. 2403(b) may apply (not certified)
Fla. Stat., sec. 454.021 Attorneys; admission to practice law; Supreme Court to
govern and regulate, etc., etc.
8. John F. Harkness, Executive Director Cross-party for UPL
The Florida Bar Florida Bar Investigation No. 20133090(5)
651 East Jefferson Street of Neil J. Gillespie for the Unlicensed
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300 Practice of Law (UPL)
Telephone: (850) 561-5600
Email: jharkness@flabar.org (Also served by email, Rule 29.3)
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP192606348
9. Hon. Ed Carnes, United States Chief Judge U.S. Appellate Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit Appeal 13-11585-B
56 Forsyth St., N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Telephone: 404-335-6100
No Email Available
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FNW90673552
10. Hon. Wm. Terrell Hodges, United States District Court Judge, Senior Status
United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Ocala Division
Golden-Collum Memorial Federal Building & US Courthouse
207 NW Second Street
Ocala, Florida 34475-6666 U.S. District Court, removed
Telephone: 352-369-4860 February 4, 2013 from Florida Court
No Email Available 5:13-cv-00058-WTH-PRL
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP191755162
11. Hon. Hale Ralph Stancil Florida Trial Court, removed
Florida Circuit Court Judge February 4, 2013 to USDC
Marion County Judicial Center 42-2013CA-000115
110 N.W. 1st Avenue
Ocala, FL 34475
Telephone: 352-401-6763
Fax: 352-401-7819
Email: hstancil@circuit5.org (Also served by email, Rule 29.3)
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP190067176
Rule29ProofofService,correctedpetitionforwritofcertiorari,in forma pauperis, V.S.
SupremeCourt,November5,2013,NeilJ. Gillespiev. ReverseMortgageSolutions,Inc. etal.
12. TiffanyCaparas,Esq. ForDefendantsMarkGillespie,
Kaufman,EnglettandLynd,PLLC JoettaGillespie,ElizabethBidgood
111 N. MagnoliaAve.,Suite 1600
Orlando,FL32801 NoticeofConsenttoJudgment
Telephone:407-513-1900 filedJuly8,2013
TollFree: 888-238-2686 42-2013CA-000115
Fax:407-513-1961
Email:TCaparas@kelattoneys.com (Alsoservedbyemail,Rule29.3)
Email: KELinbox@kelattomeys.com
VIAV.P.S. No. lZ64589FP193065583
13. GregoryD.Jones,Esq. FloridaBarLawyerReferralService
109BrushStreet,Suite500 referraltoNeilJ. GillespieforUPL
Tampa,FL33602 ($25 feepaid;consultnotprovided)
Telephone: 813-229-7007
Email:gjones@rywantalvarez.com(Alsoservedbyemail,Rule29.3)
VIAV.P.S. No. lZ64589FP190046395
14. CraigHBenson,Esq. NeilGillespie, formerclient
c/oWilliamH. Abbuehl,ExecutiveDirector Foreclosurelegaladviceonly
ConlffiunityLegalServicesofMid-Fla.(CLSMF) Noforeclosurerepresentation
128AOrangeAvenue
DaytonaBeach,Florida32114-4310
Telephone: 386-255-6573
Fax: 386-257-6824
Email:billa@clsmf.org(Alsoservedbyemail,Rule29.3)
VIAV.P.S. No. lZ64589FP194745604
Ideclareunderpenaltyof perjurythattheforegoingistrueandcorrect.
ExecutedonNovember5,2013.
eilJ.
8092S
Ocala, lorida34481
Telephone:(352)854-7807
Email:neilgillespie@nlfi.net.Rule2.516,
FloridaRulesJudicialAdministration
Page- 4
Proof of Del i very
Tracking Number: 1Z64589FP191977539
Service: UPS 3 Day Select
Weight: 1.00 lb
Shipped/Billed On: 11/05/2013
Delivered On: 11/06/2013 9:21 A.M.
Delivered To: 813 LAKE BRADFORD RD
TALLAHASSEE, FL, US 32304
Signed By: J MOON
Left At: Office
Print This Page
Close Window
Dear Customer,
This notice serves as proof of delivery for the shipment listed below.
Thank you for giving us this opportunity to serve you.
Sincerely,
UPS
Tracking results provided by UPS: 11/12/2013 6:17 P.M. ET
Close Window
https://www.ups.com/WebTracking/processPOD?Requester=&tracknum=1Z64589FP191977539&refNumbers=&loc=en_US
2

Neil Gillespie
From: "Mail Delivery System" <MAILER-DAEMON@ESA01.oag.state.fl.us>
To: <neilgillespie@mfi.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:01 PM
Attach: ATT00010.dat; ATT00011.eml
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Page 1 of 1
11/15/2013
The following message to <ag@myfloridalegal.com> was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 554-'Mail for ag@myfloridalegal.com rejected for policy reasons.'
3
VIAU.P.S.No. IZ64589FP297121208 November4,2013
AttorneyGeneralPamelaJoBondi
Officeof theAttorneyGeneral
Stateof Florida
PL-OI TheCapitol
Tallahassee,FL32399-1050
Notice: Clerk'sletterdatedOctober28,2013enclosed,U.S. SupremeCourt
RE: ServiceofCourtDocuments,PleadingsandServicetotheFloridaAttorneyGeneral
Rule2.516,FloridaRulesJudicialAdministration
28U.S.C. 2403(b),constitutionalityofanystatuteof thatStateaffectingthe
publicinterestisdrawninquestion
Chapter48FloridaStatutes,ProcessandServiceof Process
PleasefindenclosedtheClerk'sletterdatedOctober28,2013 fromtheU.S. SupremeCourt.
TheClerk'sletterwasprovidedtoyouNovemberI,2013asshownontheattachedservicelist.
ThisisademandfortheAttorneyGeneral'semailaddressforserviceof courtdocuments
requiredbyRule2.516,FloridaRulesJudicialAdministration,oranyotherapplicablestateor
federalconstitution,statute,ruleorcaseholding.PreviouslyImadethisrequesttoLeslie Jacobs
November I,2013byemailanddidnotgetaresponse.
PleasenotethatchangesEffectiveJuly I,2013toU.S. SupremeCourtrule29.3requires:
"Anelectronicversionof thedocumentshallalsobetransnlittedtoallotherpartiesatthe
timeoffilingorreasonablycontemporaneoustherewith,unlessthepartyfilingthe
documentisproceedingproseandinfornlapauperisortheelectronicserviceaddressof
thepartybeingservedisunknownandnotidentifiablethroughreasonableefforts."
ThisisalinktotheU.S. SupremeCourt'sPressReleaseApril29,2013,revisedversionof the
Rulesof theCourt.http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013revisedrules.pdf
Thisisademandforthenameandofficeaddressof theperson,howeverdesignated,forservice
of processtotheAttorneyGeneralforthestateof Floridapursuantto28U.S.C. 2403(b),
constitutionalityof anystatuteof thatStateaffectingthepublicinterestisdrawninquestion.
4
Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi November 4,2013
Office of the Attorney General Page - 2
This is a demand for the name and office address of the person, however designated, for service
of process to the Attorney General for the state of Florida pursuant to Chapter 48, Florida
Statutes, Process and Service of Process, or any other applicable state or federal constitution,
statute, rule or case holding.
Time is of the essence. Thank you.
Telephone: 352-854-7807
Email: neilgillespie@mfi.net. Rule 2.516, Florida Rules Judicial Administration
Enclosure: Clerk's letter dated October 28, 2013, U.S. Supreme Court, service list

Neil Gillespie
From: "Diana Esposito" <Diana.Esposito@myfloridalegal.com>
To: "Neil Gillespie" <neilgillespie@mfi.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: Your letter of November 12, 2013
Page 1 of 2
11/15/2013
Dear Mr. Gillespie,

If you don't have a public records request, I'm afraid we cannot assist you. I respectfully request that you
take the Office of the Attorney General, myself, Kenneth Wilson and Attorney General Bondi off your
mailing list concerning your case against Reverse Mortgage Solutions and your claims against Mr.
Rodems or other attorneys because our office is not a party of record in those matters and it is an
expense you do not have to incur. In the future, if you have a public records request, you may direct that
to my attention and I will do my best to respond.

Respectfully,
Diana R. Esposito
Tampa, FL 33602
Tel: 813-233-2600, x110
Fax: 813-233-2886

"Neil Gillespie" ---11/13/2013 04:13:33 PM---Diana R. Esposito Chief-Assistant Attorney General

From: "Neil Gillespie" <neilgillespie@mfi.net>
To: "Diana Esposito" <Diana.Esposito@myfloridalegal.com>, "AG Pam Bondi" <pam.bondi@myfloridalegal.com>, "Gov.
Rick Scott" <Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com>, "Special Rapporteur Gabriela Knaul" <SRindependenceJL@ohchr.org>,
"Shuaib Chalklen Special Rapporteur Disability" <enable@un.org>, "InfoDesk UN Geneva" <InfoDesk@ohchr.org>,
"Hyacinthe Medenou" <HMedenou@ohchr.org>, "Gianni Magazzeni UN Geneva" <gmagazzeni@ohchr.org>, "Eunice
Ajambo" <ajambo@un.org>, "Revi Kumar" <rkumar@ohchr.org>, "Css Intern1 Ohchr" <cssintern1@ohchr.org>, "John F
Harkness" <jharkness@flabar.org>, "Paul F Hill" <phill@flabar.org>, "Kenneth Lawrence Marvin" <kmarvin@flabar.org>,
"John Thomas Berry" <jberry@flabar.org>, "Eugene Keith Pettis" <epettis@hpslegal.com>, "Gregory William Coleman"
<gcoleman@bclclaw.com>, "Mary Ellen Bateman" <mbateman@flabar.org>, <neilgillespie@mfi.net>
Cc: "Kenneth Wilson" <Kenneth.Wilson@myfloridalegal.com>
Date: 11/13/2013 04:13 PM
Subject: Re: Your letter of November 12, 2013

Diana R. Esposito
Tampa, FL 33602
Tel: 813-233-2600, x110
Fax: 813-233-2886
Dear Ms. Esposito:
5
Kindly provide what I requested in the attached letter. It was not a public records request.
1. The Attorney General's email address for service of court documents required by Rule 2.516, Florida
Rules Judicial Administration
2. The name and office address of the person, however designated, for service of process to the Attorney
General for the state of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2403(b), constitutionality of any statute of that
State affecting the public interest is drawn in question.
3. The name and office address of the person, however designated, for service of process to the Attorney
General for the state of Florida pursuant to Chapter 48, Florida Statutes, Process and Service of Process,
or any other applicable state or federal constitution, statute, rule or case holding.
FYI - United Parcel Service is "a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days"
within the meaning of U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29. The U.S. Supreme Court has accepted UPS service
from me in Petition No. 12-7747 and Petition No. 13-7280.
Sincerely,
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
Telephone: (352) 854-7807
----- Original Message -----
From: Diana Esposito
To: neilgillespie@mfi.net
Cc: Kenneth Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:11 PM
Subject: Your letter of November 12, 2013
Dear Mr. Gillespie, I just received your letter of November 12, 2013 requesting a response about
"Service of Court Documents." That is a legal question which is not a request for a public document and
since there are many different situations in which service of process is deemed sufficient and when it is
not, you are asking a legal question which I cannot answer. (I will however tell you that a UPS delivery
and signature, in most instances, does not constitute "service of process.")

If you have any specific documents you would like me to obtain for you, please let me know, otherwise
I don't think I can be of any assistance to you.

Regards,
Diana R. Esposito
Tampa, FL 33602
Tel: 813-233-2600, x110
Fax: 813-233-2886[attachment "Letter to AG Bondi Nov-04-2013.pdf" deleted by Diana Esposito/OAG]
Page 2 of 2
11/15/2013
Gabriela Knaul, Special Rapporteur Shuaib Chalklen, Special Rapporteur on
Independence of Judges and Lawyers Disability, United Nations Enable (website)
Office of the United Nations High Secretariat for the Convention on the Rights
Commissioner for Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities @ Department
United Nations Office at Geneva of Economic and Social Affairs
8-14 Avenue de la Paix United Nations, S-2906
1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland New York, NY 10017 United States
October 25, 2013
Urgent Appeal - For Protection from Political Persecution in the United States
Observer requested for new petition filed October 23rd in the U.S. Supreme Court
Dear Mrs. Knaul and Mr. Chalklen:
My name is Neil Gillespie, age 57, a law-abiding, indigent, disabled citizen of the United States.
I am being persecuted by The Florida Bar, U.S. Judge William Terrell Hodges, and Florida
attorneys Ryan Christopher Rodems and Eugene P. Castagliuolo, in retaliation for petitioning for
a redress of grievances in Petition No. 12-7747 for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Unfortunately Petition No. 12-7747 was compromised by fraud of the Respondents. Specific
examples of current and ongoing political persecution of me include:
Petition No. 12-7747 was denied February 19, 2013. Rehearing was denied April 15, 2013.
In May 2013 Diana R. Esposito, Florida Chief-Assistant Attorney General, provided me
incriminating public records showing Respondent David A. Rowland, General Counsel for
Respondent Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Florida, concocted with others a fraud to falsely portray
to Kenneth Wilson, Florida Assistant Attorney General, that I did not serve Mr. Rowland my
petition as I certified under Supreme Court Rule 29. Mr. Wilson claims he relied on Rowlands
fraud, and did not submit a brief in opposition due the Supreme Court January 14, 2013.
Without a response, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi denied me due process under the Fifth
and Fourteenth Amendments. The U.S. Supreme Court relies on opposition briefs as part of its
adversarial process to properly litigate and decide a petition. Floridas opposition brief was due
January 14, 2013. AG Bondi did not respond for Florida, thus no opposition brief was distributed
for the Supreme Courts Conference February 15, 2013.
5
Gabriela Knaul, Special Rapporteur, Independence of Judges and Lawyers October 25, 2013
Shuaib Chalklen, Special Rapporteur on Disability Page -2
Political persecution of Neil Gillespie
I am being persecuted in retribution for two recent petitions for redress of grievances:
Petition No. 12-7747 for writ of certiorari, U.S. Supreme Court, December 10, 2012
Petition No. SC11-1622 for writ of mandamus, Florida Supreme Court, January 9, 2012
I. Persecution of me by The Florida Bar and Mr. Rodems - UPL and foreclosure defense.
On May 14, 2013 Ghunise L. Coaxum, Florida Bar Counsel of the Unlicensed Practice of Law
(UPL) Department, Orlando Florida, informed me by letter of the Unlicensed Practice of Law
Investigation of Neil J. Gillespie; Case No. 20133090(5). The UPL complaint was made by
Ryan Christopher Rodems, and alleges I engaged in UPL for representing my own interests in:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions Inc. v. Neil J. Gillespie, et al, the wrongful foreclosure of
my home on a reverse mortgage called a HECM, Home Equity Conversion Mortgage.
Gillespie et al. v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Florida, et al, case 5:11-cv-539-WTH-TBS,
part of Petition No. 12-7747 for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.
UPL is a violation of Florida Bar Rule 10.2-1(a), and a felony crime in Florida punishable by
five (5) years incarceration and a $5,000 fine. F.S. 454.23.
But it was Mr. Rodems who engaged in UPL by wrongly representing the state of Florida in my
federal 1983 and ADA disability lawsuit no. 5:10-cv-503, more information to follow.
II. Persecution of me by U.S. Judge William Terrell Hodges - wrongful home foreclosure.
Judge Hodges made unlawful rulings to benefit the Plaintiff in a foreclosure action on my home.
Yolanda Martinez, a paralegal to Plaintiffs counsel Danielle Parsons of McCalla Raymer, LLC,
engaged in the Unlicensed Practice of Law in furtherance of a scheme to take my home by fraud,
see my Rule 11 sanction motion (Doc. 15), my Rule 55 default motion (Doc. 16), and my
verified objection to magistrate order Doc. 12 (Doc. 17) in case 5:13-cv-58-oc-WTH-PRL.
Judge Hodges is a shareholder in Bank of America, the real party Plaintiff, but failed to recuse as
required by 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(4) for his financial interest Bank of America. Judge Hodges then
ignored my 48 page affidavit for bias or prejudice, 28 U.S.C. 144, filed April 8, 2013 (Doc 22).
Tellingly Judge Hodges entered an order (Doc. 24) that wrongly denied under 144 his own
disqualification, and thus wrongly denied my Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment.
Judge Hodges will not acknowledge certain federal laws of the United States, specifically the
DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. Chapter 53), or the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB, 12 U.S.C. Chapter 53, Subchapter V) in orders
responsive to my pleadings in a contested HECM reverse mortgage foreclosure by Reverse
Mortgage Solutions, Inc. for Bank of America, the real party Plaintiff.
Shuaib Chalklen, Special Rapporteur on Disability Page -3
On March 15, 2013 I wrote to U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts about Judge
Hodges misconduct. Sen. Warren helped create and pass the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act and the CFPB. Judge Hodges wrongly remanded the foreclosure
back to state court, which I appealed. U.S. Eleventh Circuit, Appeal No. 13-11585-B.
III. Persecution by The Florida Bar and Mr. Castagliuolo of Neil J. Gillespie - Disability.
Florida attorney Eugene P. Castagliuolo has disparaged me on the basis of disability for over a
year, and made numerous threats to disrupt my disability benefits in letters to The Florida Bar.
The last letter I received from Mr. Castagliuolo is addressed to Susan Varner Bloemendaal,
Chief Branch Discipline Counsel, Tampa Branch Office, dated June 19, 2013, and states in part:
I have collected a large pile of the many, many documents filed in various, places by
Gillespie over the past several years, and I am looking forward to furnishing that pile to
the SSDI abuse investigator for Florida....Once the SSA reviews the fruits of Gillespie's
labor, I'm confident that his handicap status will be very much at issue.
The letter shows cc: Office of the Inspector General, Social Security Disability Administration
(by regular U. S. Mail). Mr. Castagliuolo infers that I am not disabled, but feign disability as
part of a plan to abandon my former prosperous business, and to opt instead for a life dependent
on disability income. I have a number of similar writings from Mr. Castagliuolo. It appears he
does not know or understand much about my disability, and my life-long habilitation efforts.
Please find enclosed the following:
AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE, FRAUD-IMPAIRMENT OF PETITION No. 12-7747
October 21, 2013- To the Special Rapporteur, Independence of Judges and Lawyers,
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and the Special
Rapporteur on Disability, United Nations Enable (website), Secretariat for the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Affidavit: Fraud or impairment of Petition No. 12-7747, a legitimate government activity
(18 U.S.C. 371), deprivation of my rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. 242), and
conspiracy against my rights (18 U.S.C. 241).
AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE-WELL-FOUNDED FEAR-POLITICAL PERSECUTION
October 21, 2013- To the Special Rapporteur, Independence of Judges and Lawyers,
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and the Special
Rapporteur on Disability, United Nations Enable (website), Secretariat for the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Affidavit: I have a well-founded fear of political persecution
Shuaib Chalklen, Special Rapporteur on Disability Page-4
Also enclosed is a copy of Petition No. 12-7747, and a CD with the whole case file. My current
petition also enclosed, also with a CD with the files up to now.
I also wrote to President Jimmy Carter as I know he is interested in the ICCPR and the UN. A
copy of my letter to President Carter is enclosed.
This is all I can do now, I will follow-up as soon as possible. Thank you.
8092 SW 1 th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
Telephone: 352-854-7807
Enclosures
SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS
UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT GENEVA
SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON DISABILITY UNITED NATIONS ENABLE
SECRETARIAT FOR THE CONVENTION OF RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, NEW YORK, NY
_________________________________________
NEIL J. GILLESPIE, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Petitioner pro se, in forma pauperis, Petition No. 12-7747 for writ of certiorari, pro se IFP
vs. Denied Feb-19-2013; rehearing denied Apr-15-2013
THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Application No. 12A215 granted by Justice Thomas
FLORIDA, et al, September 13, 2012 to extend time and consolidate
Respondents. Eleventh Circuit Appeals Nos. 12-11213, 12-11028
________________________________/
AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE:
FRAUD OR IMPAIRMENT OF PETITION NO. 12-7747, A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT
ACTIVITY (18 U.S.C. 371), DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW
(18 U.S.C. 242), AND CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS (18 U.S.C. 241)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1. My name is Neil J. Gillespie. I am over 18 years old. I was the Petitioner appearing pro
se, in forma paupers, in the above-captioned Petition No. 12-7747 for writ of certiorari to the
U.S. Supreme Court, an important and legitimate government activity.
2. I made this affidavit to document the fraud or impairment of Petition No. 12-7747, a
legitimate government activity (18 U.S.C. 371), deprivation of my rights under color of law
(18 U.S.C. 242), and conspiracy against my rights (18 U.S.C. 241).
3. Petition No. 12-7747 was denied February 19, 2013. Rehearing was denied April 15,
2013. In May 2013 Diana R. Esposito, Florida Chief-Assistant Attorney General, provided me
incriminating public records showing Respondent David A. Rowland, General Counsel for the
6
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Florida, concocted with others a fraud to falsely portray to Kenneth
Wilson, Florida Assistant Attorney General, that I did not serve Mr. Rowland my petition as I
certified under Supreme Court Rule 29. Mr. Wilson claims he relied on Mr. Rowlands fraud,
and did not submit a brief in opposition due the Supreme Court January 14, 2013.
4. My letter to Mr. Wilson of May 16, 2013 shows how the fraud worked, and is attached
hereto. The letter consists of two (2) pages, supported by five (5) exhibits, 26 pages total.
5. Without a response, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi denied me due process under
the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The U.S. Supreme Court relies on opposition briefs as
part of its adversarial process to properly litigate and decide a petition. Floridas opposition brief
was due January 14, 2013. AG Bondi did not respond for Florida, thus no opposition brief was
distributed for the Supreme Courts Conference February 15, 2013.
6. I notified Florida Governor Rick Scott and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi of the
foregoing by letter May 24, 2013. Neither Gov. Scott nor AG Bondi responded. Attached hereto
is the one page letter to Gov. Scott and AG Bondi, and 5 pages of supporting documents.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
I solemnly swear, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing facts, upon personal
knowledge, and information and belief, are true, correct, and complete, so help me God.
Dated this 21st day of October 2013.

NEIL J. GILLESPIE
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP294626428 May 16, 2013
and kenneth.wilson@myfloridalegal.com
Kenneth V. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General
Civil Litigation Bureau -Tampa
501 E Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1100
Tampa, Florida 33602
RE: Missing Public Records, Gillespie v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Florida, et al.
Petition No. 12-7747 for Writ of Certiorari, Supreme Court of the United States
Dear Mr. Wilson:
So sorry to see you got duped by court counsel David Rowland and paralegal Sandra Burge, who
misrepresented to you that I did not provide Mr. Rowland a copy of Petition No. 12-7747. That
must explain why the petition was not among the 323 pages of public records provided by your
office that arrived here in Ocala May 9, 2013 in response to my records request.
An email (Exhibit 1) from Mr. Rowlands paralegal Sandra Burge to Chief Assistant Attorney
General Diana R. Esposito 12/20/2012 at 12:51 PM, Cc to David Rowland and Chris Nauman,
advanced this material falsehood, which Ms. Esposito sent to you, Cc to Amanda Cavanaugh:
The Plaintiff's Notice of Filing the petition for writ of certiorari was received in the Legal
Department's Office on 12/18/12 is attached as well as the Court's docket indicating a
response is due, if needed, by January 14, 2013. Neither a copy of the petition nor
"separate Volume Appendices" accompanied the Notice.
A letter (Exhibit 2) emailed by you January 8, 2013 repeated the falsehood back to Mr. Rowland:
While Plaintiff did not provide a copy of his Petition....
On December 10, 2012 I served Mr. Rowland per Rule 29, proof of service, the following:
1. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States,
2. Rule 39 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
3. Rule 29 proof of service, December 10, 2012
4. Compact Disk (CD) containing PDF files of the separate volume appendices.
5. My cover letter to the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court, December 10, 2012
United Parcel Service (UPS) tracking 1Z64589FP297520287 shows delivery December 11, 2012
at 10:55 AM to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, 800 E. Twiggs Street, Tampa, Florida 34481.
FYI, all UPS ground shipping within Florida is delivered next day, unless shipped on Friday.
The UPS proof of delivery for 1Z64589FP297520287 December 11, 2012 shows DAVIS at
the front desk signed for the delivery, and shows an image of the signature D. Davis. A seven
(7) page composite of the UPS proof of delivery and tracking documents is enclosed. (Exhibit 3).
Kenneth V. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General May 16, 2013
The document referred to by Ms. Burge in her deceptive email to Ms. Esposito was a Rule 12.3
notice, and notice of waiver to file a response, delivered December 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM to the
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Unfortunately Ms. Burge, Mr. Rowland, and Mr. Nauman failed to
inform you that my petition was delivered a week earlier, December 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM.
The Thirteenth Circuit gang further mislead you by providing you my December 10, 2012 cover
letter to the Clerk of the Supreme Court which they date-stamped December 18, 2012, when this
letter was in fact a second courtesy copy of the one received by Rowland December 11, 2012 but
does not appear date-stamped as such in the records your office provided me May 9, 2013.
Enclosed you will find evidence showing I served by UPS the Rule 12.3 notice, and notice of
waiver to Mr. Rowland December 17, 2012 tracking no. 1Z64589FP291778029, which was
delivered December 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM, to the Courts address, 800 E. Twiggs Street, Tampa,
Florida. The UPS proof of delivery shows DAVIS at the front desk signed for the delivery. A
composite of the UPS proof of delivery and tracking documents is enclosed. (Exhibit 4).
The Supreme Court sent me three (s) sets of Rule 12.3 notices, and notices of waiver to file a
response, December 14, 2013 after my petition was docketed, with instructions for notifying
opposing counsel(s) that the case was docketed. (Exhibit 5).
You have my sympathy for any embarrassment caused by the deception of Mr. Rowland and his
accomplices, that caused an inaccurate letter to issue from the Office of the Attorney General
falsely implying I did not provide a copy of my petition to Mr. Rowland. (Exhibit 2).
Enclosed you will find my records request to Mr. Rowland intended to correct the record. If and
when I get an accurate response back, I will provide you the correct date-stamped petition for
inclusion in the record showing it was received by Mr. Rowland December 11, 2012.
Until then you can find Petition No. 12-7747 online at the link below. Thank you.
http://nosueorg.blogspot.com/2012/12/petition-for-writ-of-certiorari-to.html
Sincerely,
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
Enclosures
cc: Gov. Rick Scott, via U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP290544836
cc: Attorney General Pam Bondi, via U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP294245643
Email to: Gov. Scott, AG Bondi, AAG Esposito, ABA service list; Florida Bar service list; Mr.
Anderson, Chair, Thirteenth Circuit JNC; Sixth Circuit Grievance Committee D, Thirteenth
Circuit BOG, David Rowland, K. Christopher Nauman, Sandra Burge.
Fw:Gillespiev. 13thJCC,etal: USSupremeCourt/ResponseDue
Diana Esposito to: KennethWilson 12/20/201201:58PM
Cc: AmandaCavanaugh
History: Thismessagehasbeenforwarded.
Ken, heretsthenewestemailfrom Sandy- nowparalegalassistanttoDavidRowland... D
Diana R. Esposito
Chief-AssistantAttorneyGeneral
Civil LitigationBureau
OfficeoftheAttorneyGeneral
501 E. KennedyBlvd,Suite1100
Tampa, FL 33602
Tel: 813-233-2600, x110
Fax: 813-233-2886
----- Forwardedby DianaEsposito/OAGon 12/20/201201:57 PM -----
From: "Burge.Sandra" 13.org>
To: "Esposito.Diana@myfloridalegal.com"<Esposito.Diana@myfloridalegal.com>
Cc: "Rowland, Dave"<ROWLANDA@fljud13.org>,"Nauman, Chris"<NAUMANKC@fljud13.org>
Date: 12/20/201212:51 PM
Subject: Gillespiev. 13thJCC, etal: USSupremeCourt/ResponseDue
Diana,
The Plaintiff'sNoticeofFilingthepetitionforwritofcertiorariwas received inthe Legal Department's
Officeon 12/18/12 is attachedas wellas theCourt'sdocketindicatingaresponse isdue,ifneeded,by
January14, 2013. Neitheracopyofthepetitionnor"separateVolumeAppendices"accompaniedthe
Notice.
Ipulledthedocketsforeachoftheappellatecases as wellas otherdocumentsthatyou mayfind
relevant.
Please adviseoftheplannedcourseofactionand providea copyoftheresponse, ifany,via attachment
toemail.
Thankyou inadvanceforyourassistance.
.. ,.:;:iHappy
Sandy Burge
Paralegal Assistant
ThirteenthJudicialCircuit
OAG- 006
1
Legal Department
800EastTwiggsStreet,Suite603
Telephone: (813)272-6843

....
Gillespiev. 13JCC.USC.121220.pdf
OAG- 007
PAM BONDI
ATTORNEYGENERAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEYGENERAL
General Civil Litigation - Tampa Bureau
Kenneth V. Wilson
Assistant Attorney General
501 East Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1100
Tampa, FL 33602
Phone (813) 233-2880 Fax (813) 233-2886
Kpnnp,II.
January 8,2013
David Rowland
General Counsel
Administrative Office of the Courts
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida
800 East Twiggs Street, Suite 603
Re: Neil Gillespie v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit et af.
U.S. District Court: 5: 1O-cv-503-0c-l OTBS, 5: l1-cv-539
1J.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit: 12-11028, 12-11213
lJ.S. Supreme Court Application, No. 2A215
U.S. Supreme Court Petition, No. 12-7747
Dear Attorney Rowland:
Ihave been assigned to review the recent tiling and notification from Plaintiff concerning
his Petition for Writ of Certiorari C'Petition") and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis ('"'Motion") before the United States Supreme Docket No. 12-7747.
PlaintitT's letter, as well as, the docket of Proceedings and Orders before the U.s.
Supreme Court indicate Plaintiff filed his Petition and Motion on December 10, 2012.
While Plaintiff did not provide a copy of his Petition, it appears from his appeal cases
that he is attempting to '''combine'' two (2) appeal cases (12-11028 and 12-11213) as basis
for his Petition. The case numbers listed above are revised to reflect the additional cases.
Nonetheless, the nature and course of his Petition are not changed from our previous
communications, in his Petition will be dismissed relatively quickly. I do not plan
nor do I advise any action or response in regard to his Petition. This is particularly true
as service below was never perfected for any defendants of our mutual concern.
I will continue to monitor the matter until there is certain finality. Please do not hesitate
to contact me for any questions or concerns. [can easily accommodate an office visit as
well.
Sincerely,
lsi Kenneth V. Wilson
Kenneth V. Wilson
OAG- 005
2
Fw: Gillespiev. 13thJCC,etal: USSupremeCourt. No. 12.7747
KennethWilson to: MaryAnn Robinson,Amanda Cavanaugh 01/08/201301:28 PM
Thismessageisdigitallysigned.
Sincerely,
KennethV. Wilson
AssistantAttorneyGeneral
Civir LitigationBureau- Tampa
OfficeoftheAttorneyGeneral
501 EKennedyBlvd., Suite1100
Tampa,Frorida 33602
Tel: (813)233-2880ext. 712
Fax: (813)233-2886
E-mail: kenneth.wifson@myfloridalegal.com
----- Forwarded by KennethWilson/OAGon01/0812013 01:28PM -----
From: "Rowland, Dave"<ROWLANDA@fljud13.org>
To: KennethWilson<Kenneth.Wilson@myfloridalegal.com>
Date: 01/08/201301:16 PM
Subject: RE: Gillespiev. 13thJCC,etal: USSupremeCourt,No. 12.7747
Mr. Wilson:
Thanks for your letter and your advice. We plan to follow your advice and w ~ take any
action. I'll alert you if anything changes on our end.
Thanks again - Dave
David A. Rowland
General COllnsel, ThirteenthJudicialCircuit
800East Twiggs Street I Suite603
Tampa, Florida33602
Telephone: (813) 272-6843
rowlanda@fljud13.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Wilson [mailto:Kenneth. Wilson@myfloridalegal.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08,2013 12:52 PM
To: Rowland, Dave; Nauman, Chris
Cc: Burge,Sandra
Subject: Gillespie v. 13th lee, et a]: US Supreme Court, No. 12.7747
GAG- 001
Please find attached my advice regarding Gillespie's recent Petition for Writ of ~ e r t i o r r i
before the United State Supreme Court. I do not advise or recommend any action. Please
do not hesitate to contact me for any questions or concerns, If desired, I can easily meet
with you to discuss any issues concerning this matter. Thank you - ken
(See attached file: Ltr.Rowland.130 108.pdf)
Sincerely,
Kenneth V. Wilson
Civil Litigation Bureau - Tampa
Tel: (813) 233-2880 ext. 712
Fax: (813) 233-2886
E-mail: kenneth. wilson@mytloridalegal.com Ltr.Rowland.13010B.pdf
OAG- 002
Proof of Del i very
Service: UPS Ground
Weight: 1.00 lb
Delivered On: 12/11/2012 10:55 A.M.
Delivered To: 800 E TWIGGS ST
TAMPA, FL, US 33602
Signed By: DAVIS
Left At: Front Desk
Print This Page
Close Window
Dear Customer,
Sincerely,
UPS
Close Window
UPS: Tracking Information https://wwwapps.ups.com/WebTracking/processPOD?lineData=Tampa^...
1 of 1 5/13/2013 7:44 PM
3
Track
View Tracking History
Tracki ng Detai l A A A Help Print
1Z64589FP297520287
Updated: 05/11/2013 8:37 P.M. Eastern Time
Del i vered

Request Status Updates
Report a Claim
Addi ti onal Informati on
Type: Package
Weight: 1.00 lb
Shi pment Progress
What's This?
Delivered On:
Tuesday, 12/11/2012 at 10:55 A.M.
Left At:
Front Desk
Signed By:
DAVIS
Proof of Delivery
Shipping Information
To:
800 E TWIGGS ST
TAMPA, FL, 33602, US
Shipped By
UPS Ground
UPS My Choice
UPS My Choice Help
Add Description
Subscribe to UPS E-mail: Modify E-mail Preferences ViewExamples Site Feedback
Contact UPS
Browse Online Support
E-mail UPS
Live Chat
Call Customer Service
Support
Open a Shipping Account
Manage Accounts
Access Billing Options
Change Your Delivery
Solutions for:
Healthcare
Small Business
High Tech
More...
Other UPS Sites:

Home About UPS Site Guide Investors Careers Pressroom UPS Global UPS Mobile UPS Blog
Service Terms and Conditions Website Terms of Use Privacy Notice Your California Privacy Rights Protect Against Fraud
Copyright 1994-2013 United Parcel Service of America, Inc. All rights reserved.
My UPS Shipping Tracking Freight Locations Support UPS Solutions
Uni ted States | Contact UPS | The UPS Store Search Welcome, Neil J. Gillespie | Logout
UPS: Tracking Information https://www.ups.com/WebTracking/returnToDetails?loc=en_US
1 of 1 5/11/2013 8:37 PM

Neil Gillespie
From: "UPS Quantum View" <auto-notify@ups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:37 AM
Subject: UPS Delivery Notification, Tracking Number 1Z64589FP297520287
Page 1 of 2
12/11/2012

UPS My Choice
can help you avoid
missed home
deliveries.

Learn More

***Do not reply to this e-mail. UPS and Neil J .
Gillespie will not receive your reply.
At the request of Neil J. Gillespie, this notice
is to confirm that the following shipment has
been delivered.
Important Delivery Information
Delivery Location: FRONT DESK
Signed by: DAVIS
Shipment Detail
Ship To:
David A. Rowland, Court Counsel
Thirteenth J udicial Circuit Florida
800 E TWIGGS ST
TAMPA
FL
33602
US

____2@@2@@2uo95wcv____
Delivery Date /
Time:
11-December-2012 / 10:55
AM
Number of Packages: 1
UPS Service: GROUND
Weight: 1.0 LBS

2012 United Parcel Service of America, Inc. UPS, the UPS brandmark, and the color brown are trademarks of
United Parcel Service of America, Inc. All rights reserved.
For more information on UPS's privacy practices, refer to the UPS Privacy Policy.
Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. UPS will not receive any reply message.
For questions or comments, visit Contact UPS.

This communication contains proprietary information and may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient,
the reading, copying, disclosure or other use of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and you are instructed
to please delete this e-mail immediately.
Privacy Notice
Contact UPS
Page 2 of 2
12/11/2012
Track
Log-In for additional tracking details.
1Z64589FP297520287
Updated: 12/11/2012 8:17 A.M. Eastern Time
On Vehi cl e for Del i very Today

Change Delivery
Type: Package
Weight: 1.00 lb
Shi pment Progress
What's This?
Scheduled Delivery:
Tuesday, 12/11/2012, By End of Day
Last Location:
Tampa, FL, United States, Tuesday, 12/11/2012
Location Date
Local
Time
Activity
Tampa, FL, United States 12/11/2012 6:58 A.M. Out For Delivery
12/11/2012 3:30 A.M. Arrival Scan
Orlando, FL, United States 12/11/2012 2:30 A.M. Departure Scan
Orlando, FL, United States 12/10/2012 11:46 P.M. Arrival Scan
Ocala, FL, United States 12/10/2012 9:24 P.M. Departure Scan
12/10/2012 7:11 P.M. Origin Scan
United States 12/10/2012 5:59 P.M. Order Processed: Ready for UPS
To: TAMPA, FL, US
Shipped By
UPS Ground
Subscribe to UPS E-mail: Enter e-mail address Sign Up ViewExamples Site Feedback
Contact UPS
E-mail UPS
Live Chat
Support
Get Started
Register
Solutions for:
Healthcare
Small Business
High Tech
More...
Other UPS Sites:

Uni ted States | Contact UPS | The UPS Store Search New User | Log-In
UPS: Tracking Information http://wwwapps.ups.com/WebTracking/processRequest?HTMLVersion=5...
1 of 1 12/11/2012 8:18 AM

Neil Gillespie
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 6:14 PM
Subject: UPS Ship Notification, Tracking Number 1Z64589FP297520287
Page 1 of 2
12/11/2012

UPS My Choice
can help you avoid
missed home
deliveries.

Learn More

This message was sent to you at the request of
Neil J . Gillespie to notify you that the electronic
shipment information below has been transmitted
to UPS. The physical package(s) may or may not
have actually been tendered to UPS for shipment.
To verify the actual transit status of your
shipment, click on the tracking link below or
contact Neil J . Gillespie directly.
Scheduled Delivery: 11-December-2012
Shipment Detail
Ship To:
800 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 603
Legal Department
TAMPA
FL
336023558
US
Click here to track if UPS has received your
shipment or visit
http://www.ups.com/WebTracking/track?
loc=en_US on the Internet.

UPS Service: GROUND
Weight: 1.0 LBS


____2@@2@@2aoNk9CH____


Privacy Notice
Contact UPS
Page 2 of 2
12/11/2012
Proof of Del i very
Service: UPS Ground
Weight: 1.00 lb
Delivered On: 12/18/2012 10:44 A.M.
Delivered To: 800 E TWIGGS ST
TAMPA, FL, US 33602
Signed By: DAVIS
Left At: Front Desk
Print This Page
Close Window
Dear Customer,
Sincerely,
UPS
Close Window
UPS: Tracking Information https://wwwapps.ups.com/WebTracking/processPOD?lineData=Tampa^...
1 of 1 5/13/2013 8:01 PM
4
Track
View Tracking History
1Z64589FP291778029
Del i vered

Report a Claim
Type: Package
Weight: 1.00 lb
Shi pment Progress
What's This?
Delivered On:
Tuesday, 12/18/2012 at 10:44 A.M.
Left At:
Front Desk
Signed By:
DAVIS
Proof of Delivery
To:
800 E TWIGGS ST
TAMPA, FL, 33602, US
Shipped By
UPS Ground
UPS My Choice
UPS My Choice Help
Add Description
Subscribe to UPS E-mail: Modify E-mail Preferences ViewExamples Site Feedback
Contact UPS
E-mail UPS
Live Chat
Support
Manage Accounts
Access Billing Options
Solutions for:
Healthcare
Small Business
High Tech
More...
Other UPS Sites:

Uni ted States | Contact UPS | The UPS Store Search Welcome, Neil J. Gillespie | Logout
UPS: Tracking Information https://www.ups.com/WebTracking/returnToDetails?loc=en_US
1 of 1 5/11/2013 10:21 PM

Neil Gillespie
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 12:08 PM
Subject: UPS Delivery Notification, Tracking Number 1Z64589FP291778029
Page 1 of 2
5/13/2013

UPS My Choice
can help you avoid
missed home
deliveries.

Learn More

***Do not reply to this e-mail. UPS and Neil J .
Gillespie will not receive your reply.
At the request of Neil J. Gillespie, this notice
is to confirm that the following shipment has
been delivered.
Delivery Location: FRONT DESK
Signed by: DAVIS
Shipment Detail
Ship To:
800 E TWIGGS ST
TAMPA
FL
33602
US

____2@@2@@2koKpX@-____
Delivery Date /
Time:
18-December-2012 / 10:44
AM
UPS Service: GROUND
Weight: 1.0 LBS


Privacy Notice
Contact UPS
Page 2 of 2
5/13/2013
Track
Log-In for additional tracking details.
1Z64589FP291778029
In Transi t: On Ti me
Business
Day(s) Left 1

Change Delivery
Type: Package
Weight: 1.00 lb
Shi pment Progress
What's This?
Scheduled Delivery:
Tuesday, 12/18/2012, By End of Day
Last Location:
Departed - Ocala, FL, United States, Monday, 12/17/2012
Location Date
Local
Time
Activity
Ocala, FL, United States 12/17/2012 9:36 P.M. Departure Scan
12/17/2012 5:38 P.M. Pickup Scan
12/17/2012 5:18 P.M. The shipment has been dropped off and is now at The UPS Store.
United States 12/17/2012 4:44 P.M. Order Processed: Ready for UPS
To: TAMPA, FL, US
Shipped By
UPS Ground
Subscribe to UPS E-mail: Enter e-mail address Sign Up ViewExamples Site Feedback
Contact UPS
E-mail UPS
Live Chat
Support
Get Started
Register
Solutions for:
Healthcare
Small Business
High Tech
More...
Other UPS Sites:

Uni ted States | Contact UPS | The UPS Store Search New User | Log-In
UPS: Tracking Information http://wwwapps.ups.com/WebTracking/processRequest?HTMLVersion=5...
1 of 1 12/17/2012 10:39 PM

Neil Gillespie
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 5:04 PM
Subject: UPS Ship Notification, Tracking Number 1Z64589FP291778029
Page 1 of 2
12/17/2012

UPS My Choice
can help you avoid
missed home
deliveries.

Learn More

This message was sent to you at the request of
Neil J . Gillespie to notify you that the electronic
shipment information below has been transmitted
to UPS. The physical package(s) may or may not
have actually been tendered to UPS for shipment.
To verify the actual transit status of your
shipment, click on the tracking link below or
contact Neil J . Gillespie directly.
Scheduled Delivery: 18-December-2012
Shipment Detail
Ship To:
Legal Department
TAMPA
FL
336023558
US
Click here to track if UPS has received your
shipment or visit
http://www.ups.com/WebTracking/track?
loc=en_US on the Internet.

UPS Service: GROUND
Weight: 1.0 LBS


____2@@2@@2Nohb1Ko____


Privacy Notice
Contact UPS
Page 2 of 2
12/17/2012
I
Drop-Of f Package Receipt: 1 of 1
THIS IS NOT SHIPPING FOR YOUR RECORDS.
DROP-OFF DROP-OFF
The UPS Store #5520 Man 17 Dec 2012 5:18 PM
11100 SW 93 COURT RD
STE 10 PICKUP
(352) 402-0099
UPS Man 17 Dec 2012 3 pkgs
CUSTOMER:
Not Provided
ID Type: Not Provided 3 pkgs
TRACKING NUMBER CARRIER & SERVICE wt(lbs)
1Z64589FP291778029 UPS Ground 0.100
1Z64589FP290805241 UPS Ground o 100
1Z64589FP294720432 UPS Ground o 100
This receip* 1is*s each package received by The UPS S*ore 115520 and
indica*es *ha* *he informa*ion for each package has been *ransmi**ed *0 each
car r ier's da*a sys*em This receip* is no* conf i rma* ion *ha* *he car r ier has
picked up *he packages To ver ify when and if a package has been picked up,
en*er one of *he fo 11 owing web addresses in your browser and en*er *he
* rack ing numbers 1is*ed above.
h**p://*heupss*ore.com (selec* Tracking, *hen en*er Tracking II)
h**p://mbe.com (selec* Tracking, *hen en*er Tracking II)
You acknowledge *ha* *he shipmen* services provided by The UPS S*ore 115520
for *he 1is*ed packages are subjec* *0 and governed by each Car r ier
Agreemen*, if applicable, *he Ra*es and Service Guide for each carrier, and
*he *ariff in effec* a* *he *ime of shipmen*.
HOLIDAY RETURNS?
THE SHIPPING TO US,
WITH A VARIETY SHIPPING OPTIONS ONE THAT
Powered by iShip(r)
12/17/2012 02:20 PM Pacific Time
SEE NOnCE ON REVERSE regarding UPSTerms. and notice of limitation of \lability. Where allowed by Jaw, shipper authorizes UPS to act as forwarding agent for exPOrt control an"
customs purposes. If exported from the US. shipppercertlfies that tlrecommodlttes. technology or software expprted fromthe US In accordancewlth the Export AdmlDlstratiorf
Regulatlom. Divers/on tontrarylo lawIs prohibited:
SupremeCourtoftheUnitedStates
OfficeoftheClerk
Washington,DC 20543-0001
WilliamK. Suter
ClerkoftheCourt
(202) 479-3011
December14, 2012
Mr. NeilJ.Gillespie
8092SW115thLoop
Ocala,FL 34481
Re: NeilJ.Gillespie
v. ThirteenthJudicialCircuit,etale
No. 12-7747
DearMr. Gillespie:
Thepetitionfor awritofcertiorariintheaboveentitledcasewasfiledon
December10, 2012andplacedonthedocketDecember14, 2012asNo. 12-7747.
Aformisenclosedfor notifyingopposingcounselthatthecasewasdocketed.
Sincerely,
WilliamK. Suter,Clerk
by I
ClaytonHiggi
CaseAnalyst
Enclosures
5
SupremeCourtoftheUnitedStates
NeilJ.Gillespie
(Petitioner)
v. No. 12-7747
ThirteenthJudicialCircuit,etale
(Respondent)
To Counselfor Respondent:
NOTICEISHEREBYGIVENpursuanttoRule 12.3thatapetitionforawritof
certiorariintheabove-entitledcasewasfiledintheSupremeCourtof theUnitedStates
onDecember10,2012,andplacedonthedocketDecember14,2012. PursuanttoRule
15.3,theduedateforabriefinoppositionisMonday,January14,2013. If tileduedate
isaSaturday,Sunday,orfederal legalholiday,thebriefisdueonthenextdaythatisnot
aSaturday,Sundayorfederal legalholiday.
UnlesstheSolicitorGeneraloftheUnitedStatesrepresentsthe
respondent,a waiverformisenclosedandshouldbesenttotheClerkonlyin
theeventyoudo notintendtofile a responsetothepetition.
OnlycounselofrecordwillreceivenotificationoftheCourt'sactionin
thiscase. Counselofrecordmustbea memberoftheBarofthisCourt.
Mr. NeilJ.Gillespie
8092SW115thLoop
Ocala, FL 34481
(352) 854-7807
NOTE: Thisnoticeisfor notificationpurposesonly, andneithertheoriginalnora copyshould
befiledintheSupremeCourt.
WAIVER
SupremeCourtof theUnitedStates
No. 12-7747
NeilJ.Gillespie v. ThirteenthJudicialCircuit,etal.
(petitioner) (Respondents)
IDONOTINTENDTOFILEARESPONSEtothepetitionfor a writofcertiorariunless
oneisrequestedbytheCourt.
Pleasecheckoneofthefollowingboxes:
o PleaseentermyappearanceasCounselofRecordfor allrespondents.
o Therearemultiplerespondents,andIdonotrepresentallrespondents.Pleaseentermy
appearanceasCounselofRecordforthefollowingrespondent(s):
IcertifythatI ama memberoftheBaroftheSupremeCourtoftheUnitedStates(Please
explainnamechangesincebaradmission):
Signature _
Date: _
(Typeorprint)Name _
oMr. OMs. oMrs. oMiss
Firm _
Address _
City&State Zip _
Phone _
SENDACOpyOFTHISFORMTOPETITIONER'SCOUNSELORTOPETITIONERIF
PRO BE. PLEASEINDICATEBELOWTHENAME(S) OFTHERECIPIENT(S)OFACOpy
OFTHISFORM. NOADDITIONALCERTIFICATEOFSERVICEISREQUIRED.
Cc:
Obtainstatusofcaseonthedocket.Byphoneat202-479-3034orviatheinternetat
http://www.supremecourtus.gov.HavetheSupremeCourtdocketnumberavailable.
_1m" III 1'.1111 rrr .'01_ t"
OFFICEOFTHE CLERK
WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE S300
,. .1 . 'r"" '" 'If' .I ., I
_mY.'I'1'11111 IIIUt.1 .1U1 I " .1 d
u.s OFFICIALMAIL

Z ". 4
:J PlTNIV BOWl.S
02 1R $ 00.45
0000012042 DEC142012
MAILEDFROM ZIPCODE 20543
)
:::i44Bi F-r.()E:"? ,.,11111. ,1.' 1'11/11, ,111.111,', J1.11, J JII' II. J'II' 1.11. f IJ I
i .# t $ ....
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP297024724 (Gov. Scott) May 24, 2013
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP296600737 (AG Bondi)
Governor Rick Scott Attorney General Pam Bondi
Office of Governor Rick Scott Office of Attorney General
State of Florida, The Capitol State of Florida
400 S. Monroe St. The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Dear Governor Scott and Attorney General Bondi:
Please find enclosed copies of Petition No. 12-7747. Unfortunately David Rowland, General
Counsel for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Florida, et al., mislead Kenneth V. Wilson, Assistant
Attorney General, when Mr. Rowland misrepresented that I did not provide him a copy of
Petition No. 12-7747. Enclosed is a copy of my letter (only) to Mr. Wilson of May 16, 2013.
Also enclosed is my public records request (only) to Mr. Rowland, which so far he has not
responded to, or acknowledged. In lieu of the date-stamped petition from Mr. Rowland, I have
provided separately to each of you a computer copy of Petition No. 12-7747. If Mr. Rowland
ever provides the date-stamped petition I requested from him, I will provide you each a copy.
Unfortunately the Attorney Generals Synopsis of Major Issues in Petition No. 12-7747, found
in the enclosed two-page AG Case #Tampa Monitor, is not factually accurate. I attribute the
errors to Mr. Rowlands falsehoods to Ms. Esposito and Mr. Wilson about the petition.
I will respond directly to Ms. Esposito about the Synopsis of Major Issues in the AG Case
#Tampa Monitor, to accurately inform and correct the record in Petition No. 12-7747.
Thank you for considering this matter affecting Floridas consumers of legal and court services.
Sincerely,
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
Enclosures
Cc: Diana R. Esposito, Chief-Assistant Attorney General, 501 East Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1100
Tampa, FL 33602, via U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP297792743; and email.
Cc email: ABA service list; the Florida Bar service list; Mr. Anderson, Chair, Thirteenth Circuit
JNC; Sixth Circuit Grievance Committee D, Thirteenth Circuit BOG; David Roland, et al.
AG Case#Tampa Monitor- Page 1
AG #Tampa Monitor
ActiveCase
Neil_v. ThirteenthJudicialCircuit,etal
venue
Currentcourt{s): u.s.Sup. Court
Courtnumber: No. 12-7747 (rinked12A215)(11th 12-11028-8)
Judge: SupremeCourtoftheUnitedStates
OfficeoftheClerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
JudicialContacts: WilliamK. Suter,ClerkoftheCourt
202-479-3011
Originatingcounty: Hillsborough
staffing
Lead counsel: KennethWilson
Unit: Potential
Location: Tampa
Appeal:
synopsis
Category: ADA, Civil Rights
Majorissues: Plaintiffsued hisformerattorneyand lawfirm inthe13th
judicialCircuitCourt. Helostby summaryjudgment. Henow
bringsthisclaimagainsthisformerattorneyand lawfirmandall
thejudgeswhohad anyinvolvementinhis 13thJudicialCircuit
Case. Notably,hehad untilOctober29,2010tofilean
amendedcomplaintandhasnotdoneso. Hefiledavoluntary
dismissalastohisformerattorneyand lawfirm. TheJudges
andthe 13thJudicialCircuithavenotbeenserved.
Constitutionalissue: None
Challenged
statute/constitutional
provision/code:
Multi-Stateissue: Yes e No
ReliefSought/Economic
Impact:
casehistory
Yearcaseopened: 2012
Databaseentry: 09/27/2012
Mostrecentactivity
(mmldd/yy):
12/18/2012
Natureofmostrecent
activity:
NoticeofPetitionforaWritofCertiorariwasfiledon 12/10/12
andplacedondocket12/14/12. Briefisoppositionisdue
--.-,1/14/13
Outcome:
Additionalparties
Additionalparties:
Amicusactivity:
Additionalcasenumbers
Lowercourt
OAG- 048
AG Case#Tampa Monitor- Page2
number:
Contract AOOOO
number:
LOAnumber:
Agency Judicial
represented:
Risk RiskClaimCategory:
Management: RiskClaimNumber:
RiskExaminer:
Phone:
Otherrepresentation
AG attorneyspreviously DianaEsposito
assignedtothiscase:
Opposingcounsel ProSe
category:
Opposingcounsel Neil J. Btl_I
name(s): 8092SW115thLoop
Ocala, FL34481
352-854-7807
Othercounsel incase:
Specialcomments
Casedocket
1. Application Granted By Justice Thomas Extending The Time To File
Until December 10, 2012
09/13/12 entered (Thomas)
09/17/12 filed
09/26/12 retrieved
2. Proof of Service [David A. Rowland, Court Counsel]
12/10/12 served
3. Notice of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari was filed on 12/10/12
and placed on docket 12/14/12. Brief is opposition is due Monday
1/14/13
12/18/12 received by court counsel
Authorhistory
Informationin thisrecordhasbeenfiled by:
LauraMartin(09/27/201203:16:26PM), DianaEsposito(12/20/201201:53:45PM), KennethWilson(12/20/2012
02:42:13PM), ValerieWilliford(12/28/2012 10:48:19AM)
OAG- 047
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP294626428 May 16, 2013
and kenneth.wilson@myfloridalegal.com
Kenneth V. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General
Civil Litigation Bureau -Tampa
Dear Mr. Wilson:
So sorry to see you got duped by court counsel David Rowland and paralegal Sandra Burge, who
misrepresented to you that I did not provide Mr. Rowland a copy of Petition No. 12-7747. That
must explain why the petition was not among the 323 pages of public records provided by your
office that arrived here in Ocala May 9, 2013 in response to my records request.
An email (Exhibit 1) from Mr. Rowlands paralegal Sandra Burge to Chief Assistant Attorney
General Diana R. Esposito 12/20/2012 at 12:51 PM, Cc to David Rowland and Chris Nauman,
advanced this material falsehood, which Ms. Esposito sent to you, Cc to Amanda Cavanaugh:
The Plaintiff's Notice of Filing the petition for writ of certiorari was received in the Legal
Department's Office on 12/18/12 is attached as well as the Court's docket indicating a
response is due, if needed, by January 14, 2013. Neither a copy of the petition nor
"separate Volume Appendices" accompanied the Notice.
A letter (Exhibit 2) emailed by you January 8, 2013 repeated the falsehood back to Mr. Rowland:
While Plaintiff did not provide a copy of his Petition....
On December 10, 2012 I served Mr. Rowland per Rule 29, proof of service, the following:
1. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States,
United Parcel Service (UPS) tracking 1Z64589FP297520287 shows delivery December 11, 2012
at 10:55 AM to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, 800 E. Twiggs Street, Tampa, Florida 34481.
FYI, all UPS ground shipping within Florida is delivered next day, unless shipped on Friday.
(7) page composite of the UPS proof of delivery and tracking documents is enclosed. (Exhibit 3).
Kenneth V. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General May 16, 2013
The document referred to by Ms. Burge in her deceptive email to Ms. Esposito was a Rule 12.3
notice, and notice of waiver to file a response, delivered December 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM to the
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Unfortunately Ms. Burge, Mr. Rowland, and Mr. Nauman failed to
inform you that my petition was delivered a week earlier, December 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM.
The Thirteenth Circuit gang further mislead you by providing you my December 10, 2012 cover
letter to the Clerk of the Supreme Court which they date-stamped December 18, 2012, when this
letter was in fact a second courtesy copy of the one received by Rowland December 11, 2012 but
does not appear date-stamped as such in the records your office provided me May 9, 2013.
Enclosed you will find evidence showing I served by UPS the Rule 12.3 notice, and notice of
waiver to Mr. Rowland December 17, 2012 tracking no. 1Z64589FP291778029, which was
delivered December 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM, to the Courts address, 800 E. Twiggs Street, Tampa,
Florida. The UPS proof of delivery shows DAVIS at the front desk signed for the delivery. A
composite of the UPS proof of delivery and tracking documents is enclosed. (Exhibit 4).
The Supreme Court sent me three (s) sets of Rule 12.3 notices, and notices of waiver to file a
response, December 14, 2013 after my petition was docketed, with instructions for notifying
opposing counsel(s) that the case was docketed. (Exhibit 5).
You have my sympathy for any embarrassment caused by the deception of Mr. Rowland and his
accomplices, that caused an inaccurate letter to issue from the Office of the Attorney General
falsely implying I did not provide a copy of my petition to Mr. Rowland. (Exhibit 2).
Enclosed you will find my records request to Mr. Rowland intended to correct the record. If and
when I get an accurate response back, I will provide you the correct date-stamped petition for
inclusion in the record showing it was received by Mr. Rowland December 11, 2012.
Until then you can find Petition No. 12-7747 online at the link below. Thank you.
http://nosueorg.blogspot.com/2012/12/petition-for-writ-of-certiorari-to.html
Sincerely,
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
Enclosures
cc: Gov. Rick Scott, via U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP290544836
cc: Attorney General Pam Bondi, via U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP294245643
Email to: Gov. Scott, AG Bondi, AAG Esposito, ABA service list; Florida Bar service list; Mr.
Anderson, Chair, Thirteenth Circuit JNC; Sixth Circuit Grievance Committee D, Thirteenth
Circuit BOG, David Rowland, K. Christopher Nauman, Sandra Burge.
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP291464859 May 16, 2013
and rowlanda@fljud13.org
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Of Florida
Legal Department
Dear Mr. Rowland:
This is a request for records, copies of the following documents I served you December 10,
2012, and were delivered December 11, 2012 to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Florida:
1. U.S. Supreme Court Petition, Gillespie v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Florida, et al.
(Provide a copy of the cover and CD itself, not the contents of the CD)
The petition, Rule 39 motion, Rule 29 proof of service, CD, and cover letter, were served on you
December 10, 2012 as provided for by Rule 29, by United Parcel Service (UPS), tracking no.
1Z64589FP297520287. UPS records show delivery the next day, December 11, 2012 at 10:55
AM to your address, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, 800 E. Twiggs Street, Tampa, Florida 33602.
(7) page composite of the UPS proof of delivery and tracking documents is enclosed.
Also provide copies of any logs showing receipt of the documents. For the documents, include
copies of the date-stamp received December 11, 2012 by your office, court counsel, and/or the
date-stamp of any other person, judge, office, or entity of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Florida.
Time is of the essence. Provide the records immediately. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, Florida 34481
Via email with attachments: K. Christopher Nauman, Assistant Court Counsel; Sandra Burge
Enclosures: UPS proof of delivery and tracking documents for 1Z64589FP297520287
AG Case#Tampa Monitor- Page 1
AG #Tampa Monitor
ActiveCase
Neil_v. ThirteenthJudicialCircuit,etal
venue
Currentcourt{s): u.s.Sup. Court
Courtnumber: No. 12-7747 (rinked12A215)(11th 12-11028-8)
Judge: SupremeCourtoftheUnitedStates
OfficeoftheClerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
JudicialContacts: WilliamK. Suter,ClerkoftheCourt
202-479-3011
Originatingcounty: Hillsborough
staffing
Lead counsel: KennethWilson
Unit: Potential
Location: Tampa
Appeal:
synopsis
Category: ADA, Civil Rights
Majorissues: Plaintiffsued hisformerattorneyand lawfirm inthe13th
judicialCircuitCourt. Helostby summaryjudgment. Henow
bringsthisclaimagainsthisformerattorneyand lawfirmandall
thejudgeswhohad anyinvolvementinhis 13thJudicialCircuit
Case. Notably,hehad untilOctober29,2010tofilean
amendedcomplaintandhasnotdoneso. Hefiledavoluntary
dismissalastohisformerattorneyand lawfirm. TheJudges
andthe 13thJudicialCircuithavenotbeenserved.
Constitutionalissue: None
Challenged
statute/constitutional
provision/code:
Multi-Stateissue: Yes e No
ReliefSought/Economic
Impact:
casehistory
Yearcaseopened: 2012
Databaseentry: 09/27/2012
Mostrecentactivity
(mmldd/yy):
12/18/2012
Natureofmostrecent
activity:
NoticeofPetitionforaWritofCertiorariwasfiledon 12/10/12
andplacedondocket12/14/12. Briefisoppositionisdue
--.-,1/14/13
Outcome:
Additionalparties
Additionalparties:
Amicusactivity:
Additionalcasenumbers
Lowercourt
OAG- 048
AG Case#Tampa Monitor- Page2
number:
Contract AOOOO
number:
LOAnumber:
Agency Judicial
represented:
Risk RiskClaimCategory:
Management: RiskClaimNumber:
RiskExaminer:
Phone:
Otherrepresentation
AG attorneyspreviously DianaEsposito
assignedtothiscase:
Opposingcounsel ProSe
category:
Opposingcounsel Neil J. Btl_I
name(s): 8092SW115thLoop
Ocala, FL34481
352-854-7807
Othercounsel incase:
Specialcomments
Casedocket
1. Application Granted By Justice Thomas Extending The Time To File
Until December 10, 2012
09/13/12 entered (Thomas)
09/17/12 filed
09/26/12 retrieved
2. Proof of Service [David A. Rowland, Court Counsel]
12/10/12 served
3. Notice of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari was filed on 12/10/12
and placed on docket 12/14/12. Brief is opposition is due Monday
1/14/13
12/18/12 received by court counsel
Authorhistory
Informationin thisrecordhasbeenfiled by:
LauraMartin(09/27/201203:16:26PM), DianaEsposito(12/20/201201:53:45PM), KennethWilson(12/20/2012
02:42:13PM), ValerieWilliford(12/28/2012 10:48:19AM)
OAG- 047
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
NEIL J. GILLESPIE,
ESTATE OF PENELOPE GILLESPIE,
(Pro se as the sole interested person, see
Fla. Prob. R., Rule 5.030(a) Exception,
and Lituchy v. Estate of Lituchy) C.A.11 Appeal No.: 12-11213-C
District Court No.: 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-TBS
Plaintiffs/Appellants,
vs. C.A.11 Appeal No.: 12-11028-B
District Court No.: 5:11-cv-00539-WTH-TBS
THIRTEENTH JUDICAL CIRCUIT,
FLORIDA, et al.
Defendants/Appellees.
_______________________________/
SEPARATE VOLUME APPENDIX
Consolidated Notice of Filing Service of Process (Proposed)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/172064977/Thirteenth-Judicial-Circuit-Service-of-Process-Appendix
1. November 1, 2010, Plaintiffs Notice of Filing Federal Complaint and Service of Process
Against Judge Martha J. Cook, Case No. 05-CA-007205, Hillsborough County Florida.
2. May 18, 2012, letter of Diana Esposito, FL Asst. Attorney General, re: service of process.
3. April 12, 2012, letter of David Rhodes, Asst. U.S. Attorney, mistakenly listed as counsel.
4. January 18, 2012, Notice of Filing (Doc. 16) Rule 4(d) service, District Court 5:11-cv-539
5. October 30, 2010, Rule 4(d) service, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, District Court 5:10-cv-503
6. October 30, 2010, Rule 4(d) service, Robert W. Bauer, et. al, District Court 5:10-cv-503
7. May 14, 2013, letter of Neil Gillespie to U.S. Marshal William B. Berger, Sr., re: service.
8. U.S. Marshals Service, Service of Process, Summons and Complaint (website information)
http://www.usmarshals.gov/process/summons-complaint.htm
9. June 3, 2013, Transcript, phone call from Deputy Roger Devall, U.S. Marshals Office,
Tampa Florida to Neil Gillespie, You might have issues getting summons - summons
issued by the Clerks of court for Judges.
10. Sonja Mullerin v John Hayter, et al.,1:12-cv-00190-SPM-GRJ, U.S. District Court,
Northern District of Florida. Alachua County Florida court alleged to operate as a RICO
enterprise, U.S. District Clerk would not issue summons for Florida judges. The Plaintiff
was previously an attorney licensed in Colorado but not licensed in Florida.
*Sonja Mullerin was formerly known as Alison Sunny Maynard, Esq.
8
35
U.S. v. Terry, No. 11-4130, C.A. 6 - Judge Martha Jean Cook and Ryan Christopher Rodems
A decision February 14, 2013 in U.S. v. Terry, No. 11-4130, U.S. Sixth Circuit is of a
substantial or controlling effect, which I submitted April 10, 2013 in Petition No. 12-7747 but
was returned out-of-time by the Clerk April 15, 2013, the same day the case closed.
U.S. v. Terry affirmed a jury conviction against former Judge Steven J. Terry of several
honest services fraud violations, citing federal anti-corruption statutes, one of which prohibits an
official from accepting things of value in return for official acts. 18 U.S.C. 201(b)(2).
In U.S. v. Terry, the government proved to a jury that Terry accepted from political
benefactor Frank Russo campaign donations, a thing of value, in return for official acts, improper
rulings on summary judgment. An FBI wiretap provided evidence of the crime. The government
proved that the defendant used the mail to carry out a scheme or artifice to defraud another,
18 U.S.C. 1341, of the intangible right of honest services. 18 U.S.C. 1346.
In my case, Respondent Judge Martha J. Cook accepted campaign donations from
Respondent Ryan C. Rodems, and two of my former lawyers, his partners William J. Cook and
Jonathan Alpert, in return for improper rulings on summary judgment, and civil contempt, during
ex parte hearings September 28, 2010 in Gillespie v. Barker, Rodems & Cook, 05-CA-7205.
Hillsborough Deputy Christopher E. Brown, and Major James Livingston, provided evidence the
Respondents falsified the record of the hearing. The Respondents used the mail to carry out their
scheme or artifice to defraud me of the intangible right of honest services. 18 U.S.C. 1346.
I only attended one of three hearings before Judge Cook September 28, 2010. The first
was my spoken motion to disqualify Judge Cook on the basis that she was a Defendant in
Gillespie v. The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Florida, et al, 5:10-cv-503, a 1983 civil rights and
ADA disability lawsuit. Judge Cook did not recuse, accused me in open court of feigning
9
36
disability, and ordered Deputy Brown to remove me. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.
required recusal because the probability of actual bias on the part of the judge or decisionmaker
is too high to be constitutionally tolerable. The Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie shows the above,
and appears in a separate appendix. (See trial record Doc. 58-2, Exh 14, response to show cause).
Judge Cook falsified the record that I elected to leave the hearing, in violation of F.S.
839.13(1) and 837.06. The transcript and errata sheet appear in a separate volume appendix.
Judge Cook proceeded ex parte with the summary judgment hearing, and Mr. Rodems
complied with her instruction to create a false record, which false testimony went unchallenged
because no one represented me. Judge Cook then granted summary judgment for Mr. Rodems,
and immediately signed, without reading, a six page order at Mr. Rodems request, one he
prepared in advance. [Appendix 1]. Judge Cook mailed me a conformed copy order in a postage
prepaid envelope bearing her name & address, and mine. [Appendix 2]. See footnote
1
.
Next, Judge Cook proceeded ex parte with the civil contempt hearing, again falsified the
record that I elected to leave in violation of F.S. 839.13(1), and found me guilty. Because this
was civil contempt, and not criminal contempt, appointment of counsel was not required under
Gideon v. Wainwright. (The defender was appointed May 27, 2011, but relieved by the court).
Two days later September 30, 2010 Judge Cook signed an improper order holding me in
civil contempt [Appendix 4], filed October 1, 2010. This is the same proposed order that Mr.
Rodems provided by mail
2
, and instructed Judge Cook to sign, together with postage paid
envelopes. [Appendix 5]. Judge Cook obeyed Mr. Rodems and signed the order. The Order

1
The record shows I established a cause of action for fraud and breach of contract by order
January 13, 2006 [Appendix 3], making any subsequent summary judgment improper. May 5,
2010 I filed Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, w/motion, on permission of Judge Barton, but
Judge Cook refused to consider the motion and denied ex parte leave to amend even one time.
2
Also enclosed was Mr. Rodems notice of voluntary dismissal of a vexatious counterclaim.
37
Adjudging Plaintiff Neil J. Gillespie In Contempt states at footnote 1:
Prior to this motion being heard, the Court heard Defendants' motion for summary judgment.
During that hearing, Plaintiff Neil J. Gillespie voluntarily left the hearing and did not return.
Fortunately Deputy Brown told his Commander, Major James Livingstion that I did not leave the
hearing voluntarily, and that I was ordered removed by Judge Cook. Major Livingstion
in turn provided me a letter dated January 12, 2011 describing what happened. Appendix B.
Judicial elections in Florida are different than those of other elected officials, and as
described in Terry. Judicial elections are nonpartisan. Only qualified lawyers can run for judicial
office, putting judicial races in a unique category. Within the pool of lawyers qualified to seek
judicial office, there is pressure not to oppose a sitting judge. Lucy Morgan of the Tampa Bay
Times wrote May 2, 2008, Unopposed judges quietly keep their seats: [Appendix 8].
...Few incumbents have lost since Florida began electing judges in nonpartisan races in
the 1970s, but the early qualifying date lets even more avoid opposition, according to a
review of election results over the past 12 years. Judges frequently escape opposition
because only lawyers can run for the jobs, and few lawyers are willing to risk angering a
judge before whom they must appear. In recent years few incumbent circuit judges have
faced opposition, and only five have been defeated...
...For the qualifying that closed Friday, there were 283 circuit judge positions statewide.
Twenty-three of those are open seats and will be contested. Of the 260 remaining seats,
only eight will be contested. The other 252 won unopposed...Supreme Court and District
Court justices run under a merit retention system. No judge has been denied another term
since the merit retention system was adopted in the 1970s...
As in Terry, Judge Cooks collaboration came relatively cheap, $300 in her initial 2002 bid. See
Appendix 9 for the donation records of Messrs. Rodems, Cook, and Alpert - $100 each. An
honest services fraud agreement need not spell out which payments control which act, just that
Judge Cook was expected to act favorably to the donor as opportunities arose. Terry at p. 6.
Unfortunately, Judge Cook failed to discharge her judicial duties without fraud, concealment,
bias, favoritism or conflict of interest, but acted like Mr. Rodems marionette. Terry at p. 11.
BILL MCCOLLUM
ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
o
~ OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Office of Citizen Services
The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050
Telephone (850) 414-3990 , SunCom 994-3990
Fax (850) 410-1630, SunCom 210-1630
December 7, 2007
Mr. Neil 1. Gillespie
8092 Southwest 115th Loop
Dear Mr. Gillespie:
Thank you for contacting Attorney General Bill McCollum regarding Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A.
and the allegation of perjury by Mr. Ryan Christopher Rodems.
The Attorney General's Office does not have jurisdiction in this matter. By contacting The Florida Bar
you have contacted the appropriate agency to review your concerns. The Florida Supreme Court has
designated The Florida Bar as the agency responsible for reviewing grievances against lawyers
licensed to practice in this state. The Florida Bar's decisions are not subject to the Attorney General's
authority.
As the Governor's Office suggested, and as you wish to file a criminal complaint regarding alleged
perjury, please contact the local law enforcement agency and state attorney's office where the criminal
violation occurred. In Florida, the local police or sheriffs department and the elected state attorney in
each judicial circuit are responsible for investigating and prosecuting crime at the local level. Those
authorities operate independently and are not a part of the Attorney General's Office. If you have not
already done so, you may contact the Hillsborough County Sheriffs Office and Thirteenth Judicial
Circuit State Attorney's Office at the following:
Hillsborough County Sheriffs Office
Post Office Box 3371
Phone: (813) 247-8000
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit State Attorney's Office
County Courthouse Annex, Fifth Floor
800 East Kennedy Boulevard
Phone: (813) 272-5400
Otherwise, please continue with your private attorney if you need any legal guidance. An attorney can
give you the legal advice which our office is not at liberty to provide to private individuals. We hope
this proves helpful to you. Thank you for contacting Attorney General McCollum's Office.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF CITIZEN SERVICES
Florida Attorney General's Office
OCSlba
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
10
11
OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEYGENERAL
GeneralCivilLitigation- TampaBureau
DianaR. Esposito
Chief-AssistantAttorneyGeneral
501 EastKennedyBlvd.,Suite1100
Tampa,FL33602
Phone(813)233-2880 Fax(813) 233-2886
http://www.mvtloridalegal.com
PAMBONDI
ATTORNEYGENERAL
STATEOFFLORIDA
May18,2012
Mr.NeilJ. Gillespie
8092SW11S
th
Loop
Ocala,Florida34481
Re: Neil Gillespie v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit et al.
Appeal#12-11028-B
YourletterdatedMay3,2012
DearMr. Gillespie:
Thank you for your letter ofMay 3, 2012 addressed to Attorney General Bondi. You
have asked the question ofwhether or not the Florida Attorney General represents the
ThirteenthCircuitin yourappealbearingdocketnumber12-11028-B. Ourofficehasnot
filed anappearanceonbehalfofanyof thedefendantsinthismatter.
I can see by looking at the docket in the U.S.D.C. - Middle District ofFlorida, your
initial complaint was dismissed for, among other reasons, failure to make service of
process on any ofthe defendants. Since that is the Order ofthe Court the Attorney
General'sOfficewouldnotbecomeinvolvedatthisstageoftheproceedingsin anycase.
Ihopethisanswersyourquestion.

DianaR. Esposito
AssistantAttorneyGeneral
DRE
12
PAM BONDI
ATTORNEYGENERAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEYGENERAL
General Civil Litigation - Tampa Bureau
Kenneth V. Wilson
501 East Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1100
Tampa, FL 33602
Phone (813) 233-2880 Fax (813) 233-2886
Kpnnp,II.
January 8,2013
David Rowland
General Counsel
Administrative Office of the Courts
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida
800 East Twiggs Street, Suite 603
Re: Neil Gillespie v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit et af.
U.S. District Court: 5: 1O-cv-503-0c-l OTBS, 5: l1-cv-539
1J.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit: 12-11028, 12-11213
lJ.S. Supreme Court Application, No. 2A215
U.S. Supreme Court Petition, No. 12-7747
Dear Attorney Rowland:
Ihave been assigned to review the recent tiling and notification from Plaintiff concerning
his Petition for Writ of Certiorari C'Petition") and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis ('"'Motion") before the United States Supreme Docket No. 12-7747.
PlaintitT's letter, as well as, the docket of Proceedings and Orders before the U.s.
Supreme Court indicate Plaintiff filed his Petition and Motion on December 10, 2012.
While Plaintiff did not provide a copy of his Petition, it appears from his appeal cases
that he is attempting to '''combine'' two (2) appeal cases (12-11028 and 12-11213) as basis
for his Petition. The case numbers listed above are revised to reflect the additional cases.
Nonetheless, the nature and course of his Petition are not changed from our previous
communications, in his Petition will be dismissed relatively quickly. I do not plan
nor do I advise any action or response in regard to his Petition. This is particularly true
as service below was never perfected for any defendants of our mutual concern.
I will continue to monitor the matter until there is certain finality. Please do not hesitate
to contact me for any questions or concerns. [can easily accommodate an office visit as
well.
Sincerely,
lsi Kenneth V. Wilson
Kenneth V. Wilson
OAG- 005
13
SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS
UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT GENEVA
SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON DISABILITY UNITED NATIONS ENABLE
SECRETARIAT FOR THE CONVENTION OF RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, NEW YORK, NY
My safe room at home since June 1, 2011
AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL J. GILLESPIE
I have a well-founded fear of political persecution
1. My name is Neil J. Gillespie. I was the Petitioner pro se in Gillespie v. Thirteenth
Judicial Circuit Florida, et al, Petition No. 12-7747 for writ of certiorari, U.S. Supreme Court.
The petition was denied February 19, 2013. Rehearing was denied April 15, 2013.
2. On Friday, April 19, 2013 at 9:32 AM I received harassing email from attorney Ryan C.
Rodems, taunting me about Petition No. 12-7747. I responded to Mr. Rodems by letter April 29,
2013 instructing him Mr. Rodems, this case is over. Move on with your life. Do not contact me
again. I provided a PDF copy of my letter by email to 31 people including Fla. Gov. Scott, AG
Bondi, Florida Bar officials, and American Bar Association officials. (the letter attached hereto).
3. Two days later, May 1, 2013, Mr. Rodems made a written complaint against me to The
Florida Bar for the unlicensed practice of law (UPL), for appearing pro se for my own interest.
The complaint is vexatious and without merit. The Florida Bar opened a UPL investigation of
me May 14, 2013. UPL is a felony, F.S. 454.23, with punishment up to 5 years incarceration.
4. On June 1, 2011 Mr. Rodems corruptly got a civil bodily attachment arrest order issued
for a coercive confinement settlement June 21st of my federal claims at the Tampa courthouse.
5. I have a well-founded of the sheriff breaking down my door to arrest me on a fraudulent
charge concocted by The Florida Bar and/or Mr. Rodems, who has terrorized me since 2006.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. I solemnly swear, under penalty of perjury,
that the foregoing facts are true, correct, and complete, so help me God.
Dated this 22nd day of October 2013.
NEIL J. GILLESPIE
STATE OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
THE FLORIDA BAR
Ghunise L. Coaxum, UPL Bar Counsel
Unlicensed Practice of Law Department,
Orlando Branch Office
VS.
Neil J. Gillespie, Case No. 20133090(5)
Unlicensed Practice of Law (UPL) Investigation, on
complaint by Ryan Christopher Rodems, Esq.
14

Neil Gillespie
From: "Neil Gillespie" <neilgillespie@mfi.net>
To: "Rick Scott" <Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com>; "Pam Bondi" <pam.bondi@myfloridalegal.com>;
"J effrey Carter Andersen" <candersen@bushross.com>; "Laurel G Bellows"
<lbellows@bellowspc.com>; "J ames R. Silkenat" <jsilkenat@sandw.com>; "Ellyn Rosen"
<Ellyn.Rosen@americanbar.org>; "Myles Lynk" <Myles.Lynk@asu.edu>; "J oseph Bluemel"
<jbluemel@hamsfork.net>; "Nancy Cohen" <ncohen@mcpclaw.com>; "Dolores Dorsainvil"
<DorsainvilD@dcobc.org>; "Linda Gosnell" <lindagosnell1@gmail.com>; "J ames Hill"
<jhill@zkslaw.com>; "J ames A Kawachika" <J AK@opglaw.com>; "Amy Lin Meyerson"
<amy@almesq.com>; "Cleaveland Miller" <cmiller@semmes.com>; "Eugene Keith Pettis"
<epettis@hpslegal.com>; "Gwynne Alice Young" <gyoung@carltonfields.com>; "J ames N Watson"
<jwatson@flabar.org>; "J ohn F Harkness" <jharkness@flabar.org>; "J ohn Thomas Berry"
<jberry@flabar.org>; "Kenneth Lawrence Marvin" <kmarvin@flabar.org>; "Leonard E Clark"
<LClark@flabar.org>; "Paul F Hill" <phill@flabar.org>; "Susan Varner Bloemendaal"
<sbloemen@flabar.org>; "Theodore P Littlewood" <tlittlew@flabar.org>; "William W Wilhelm"
<wwilhelm@flabar.org>; "Gregory Harrison Fisher" <fishlaw@gte.net>; "Belinda Barndollar Lazzara"
<blazzara@mslo-law.com>; "Maribeth L. Wetzel" <beth@goldmanwetzel.com>; "Michael G Stofer"
<mstofer@deaconandmoulds.com>; "Sandra Fascell Diamond" <sdiamond@wdclaw.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 11:11 AM
Attach: Final response to Ryan Christopher Rodems, Apr-29-2013.pdf
Subject: Final response to Ryan Christopher Rodems
Page 1 of 2
4/30/2013
Rick Scott, Governor of Florida
Pam Bondi, Office of the Florida Attorney General
The American Bar Association
The Florida Bar
Jeffrey Carter Anderson, Chair, Thirteenth Circuit JNC
Sixth Circuit Grievance Committee "D"

Dear Governor Scott, Attorney General Bondi, Mr. Anderson, and Ladies and Gentlemen:
Please find attached my final response to Ryan Christopher Rodems, prompted by his unwanted
and harassing email of April 19, 2013.
My letter gives notice to Mr. Rodems that our litigation is over, and that he should move on with
his life and not contact me again. The letter is also a comprehensive, but not exhaustive, rebuttal
to a number of issues raised by Mr. Rodems.
This matter is no longer about Mr. Rodems, or any individual bad lawyer; it is about the failure
of the State of Florida to adequately protect consumers of legal and court services, its failure to
properly regulate lawyers, law firms, the practice of law, and state judicial officers, which I
intend to pursue as long as possible, along with disability advocacy.
Florida Bar Counsel Theodore P. Littlewood should be commended for his professionalism in
conducting the initial review of my Bar complaint against Mr. Rodems, and opening disciplinary
File No. 2013-10,271 (13E) pursuant to Fla. Bar Rule 3-7.3(b), as required and in compliance
with The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.
Unfortunately The Florida Bar's Tampa Branch Office is a crony "local discipline component",
as describe by the ABA McKay Report, and improperly closed my meritorious complaint against
Mr. Rodems.
This letter is provided to Mr. Rodems as a final response, and to make a record thereof with the
American Bar Association, The Florida Bar, the Thirteenth Circuit JNC, the Sixth Circuit
Grievance Committee "D", the Office of the Florida Attorney General, and the Governor of Florida.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Page 2 of 2
4/30/2013
VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP296592596 April 29, 2013
Ryan Christopher Rodems
Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A.
501 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 790
RE: Your unwelcome, harassing email Friday, April 19, 2013 at 9:32 AM
Dear Mr. Rodems:
In response to your unwelcome and harassing email captioned above, I suggest you move on
with your life and stop contacting me. Our case is over and you need to accept that fact.
Nonetheless, you and your partners concocted a scheme and stole $7,143 from my settlement in
the Amscot case. While representing your firm in conflict with me, a former client in the same
matter as the prior representation, you engaged in a wide range of misconduct, described in part
by Robert Bauer, Esq. in open court August 14, 2008: Mr. Rodems has, you know, decided to
take a full nuclear blast approach instead of us trying to work this out in a professional manner.
In matters before The Florida Bar, you have and engaged in misconduct, and joined with my
former lawyers in a pattern of racketeering activity to subvert or undermine my complaints.
In 2003 your firm accused me of extortion for making a $4,524 settlement offer under ACAP.
You have also committed crimes while improperly representing your firm and partner, including
honest services fraud with Judge Martha Cook, as set forth in my Rule 21 Motion to correct and
supplement my petition for rehearing, citing U.S. v. Terry, No. 11-4130, U.S. Sixth Circuit Court
of Appeals. Unfortunately my motion was not heard, and was returned April 16, 2013.
You have also repeatedly disparaged me on the basis of disability, with a strategy intended to
inflict severe emotional distress on me, knowing I am vulnerable from your firms consultation
with me on disability and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation in DLES case 98-066-DVR.
Mr. Rodems, you are an unindicted criminal, a crook, a bully, and a liar. Nothing in your email
changes that fact. Your former client Heike Albert called you an a--hole, according to your
testimony April 4, 2012 before U.S. District Judge Honeywell. Mr. Castagliuolo referred to you
as asshole Rodems in his email to me June 14, 2011.
However this matter is no longer about you, it is about the failure of the State of Florida to
adequately protect consumers of legal and court services, its failure to properly regulate lawyers,
law firms, the practice of law, and state judicial officers affecting interstate commerce. This is
my calling, in addition to disability advocacy, which I intend to pursue as long as possible.
This letter is provided to you as a final response, and to make a record thereof with the American
Bar Association, The Florida Bar, the Thirteenth Circuit JNC, the Sixth Circuit Grievance
Committee D, the Office of the Florida Attorney General, and the Governor of Florida.
Ryan Christopher Rodems April 29, 2013
Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A. Page - 2
Your contumacious disregard of a court-imposed prohibition of conduct
Previously I instructed you not to contact me by email (or telephone) which you have disobeyed.
Your email captioned above provided no new information. As such, you are engaged in a course
of conduct directed at a me which causes substantial emotional distress to me and serves no
legitimate purpose. Your ongoing harassment of me is a volition of a court-imposed prohibition
of conduct and therefore a criminal felony offense (3rd degree) under F.S. 784.048(4).
We are not on a first name basis. I provided you notice thereof by certified letter December 22,
2006, with a copy to Hillsborough Judge Claudia Isom, who on February 5, 2007 entered the
following court-imposed prohibition of conduct on the record in open court.
Transcript, February 5, 2007 hearing before Judge Claudia Isom, page 9:
16 THE COURT: All right, back on the record. In
17 the context of this litigation please refer to each
18 other by your surnames so we won't have any question
19 about whether or not people are being professional.
20 Okay.
21 MR. GILLESPIE: And, Judge, would that go for
22 letters he sends me as well?
23 THE COURT: I said in the context of this
24 litigation. So if the letters have to do with this
25 litigation that would be encompassed in this.
A PDF copy of your email accompanies this letter, with the text set forth below.
From: "Ryan Rodems" <Rodems@barkerrodemsandcook.com>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:32 AM
Attach: Ltr Denying Gillespie motion for rehearing 4-15-2013.pdf; Finding of No
Probable Cause [Gillespie Complaint] [Fla Bar No. 2013-10,271 (6D).pdf
Subject: Supreme Court letter denying your motion for rehearing and Florida Bar
rejecting your grievance no probable cause
Neil:
The United States Supreme Court rejected your petition for writ of certiorari, and your
motion for rehearing on that. The Florida Bar rejected your grievance against me as
unfounded. I am sending you copies for your records, and you have my permission to
post them on your website.
Sincerely,
813/489-1001 (Office)
813/205-1198 (Mobile)
E-mail: rodems@barkerrodemsandcook.com
You violated Judge Isoms court-imposed prohibition of conduct [F.S. 784.048(4)] by failing
to address me by my surname in the email, which letter is in the context of our litigation.
Your email of Friday, April 19, 2013 9:32 AM was blocked by my spam filter, and may have
been infected with a virus. I did not open the attachments, and deleted the email after making a
PDF copy. Any future email from you will be deleted unread. Any mail from you will be
refused. If you need to contact me, hire counsel. You are not welcome to contact me at all.
Petition No. 12-7747 - Supreme Court of the United States
Your statement about Petition No. 12-7747, captioned below, is false:
The United States Supreme Court rejected your petition for writ of certiorari, and your
motion for rehearing on that.
My petition and rehearing were denied - not rejected. The Court denies about 99% of the
approximately 10,000 petitions filed with the Court in the course of a Term. Review is
discretionary, and less than 100 petitions are granted certiorari per Term. Therefore most
petitions are denied certiorari, which denial is not a judgment on the merits of a case.
On September 13, 2012, Justice Thomas GRANTED my Application No. 12A215 extending the
time to file until December 10, 2012. Certainly Justice Thomas would not grant an application if
the petition was without some merit. However the process of selection is opaque, and relies on
cert. pool, briefings by law clerks, which unfortunately can prejudice a case. The fate of a
petition may be disproportionately affected by which clerk writes the pool memo. - Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cert_pool
The Supreme Court docket shows two cases for me, and only one for you. My Application No.
12A215 was granted by Justice Thomas. A docket search shows nothing ever granted for you.
As shown in my Rule 12.6 notice of party interest submitted January 22, 2013, you had no real
party interest in the petition anyway. I gave notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)
to you and BRC October 29, 2010 in Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB. On June 21, 2011 you
and BRC improperly, and unsuccessfully, attempted to reenter the case. The Court henceforth
did not respond to any of your pleadings. Judge Hodges rejected you and your unprofessional
tactics. You and BRC were never a party in the main case, Case 5:11-cv-00539-WTH-TBS.
(Note: You and BRC had an interest in my first petition filed August 20, 2012, in Fla. Supreme
Court No. SC11-1622, which was returned out-of-time, due to my confusion over a rehearing)
Unfortunately my Rule 21 Motion to correct and supplement my petition for rehearing was
returned unheard April 16, 2013, as well as a second letter to the Clerk April 12, 2013. The
motion arrived untimely and not considered on the merits, which included the following issues:
Part 1, Racketeering, The Florida Bar, and my letter to Ms. Young of March 28, 2013:
Ms. Young, the requested investigation into witness tampering and obstruction of justice
may vindicate Ms. Pruett-Barry. In that case it would show Robert W. Bauer is engaged
in the worst kind of misconduct possible: Betrayal of his clients with malice forethought.
Mr. Bauer may have discovered the perfect crime: He represents himself to clients as a
specialist in attorney malpractice, and once retained, bleeds the client of funds in a fake
representation that is intended to break the client, and intended to protect the subject
attorney. This looks like a pattern of racketeering that is aided and abetted by other
attorneys, such as Ryan Christopher Rodems, Eugene P. Castagliuolo, and Catherine
Barbara Chapman in my cases.
Ms. Young, is The Florida Bar part of this racketeering activity?
Part 2, Honest services fraud citing U.S. v. Terry, No. 11-4130, U.S. Sixth Circuit Court
of Appeals, decided February 14, 2013, where you and Judge Cook carried out a scheme or
artifice to defraud me of the intangible right of honest services in violation of 18 U.S.C.
201(b)(2), 18 U.S.C. 1341, 18 U.S.C. 1346, F.S. 839.13(1) and 837.06.
Judge Cook accepted campaign donations from you, and two of my former lawyers, your
partners William J. Cook and Jonathan Alpert, in return for improper rulings on summary
judgment, and civil contempt, during ex parte hearings September 28, 2010 in Gillespie v.
Barker, Rodems & Cook, 05-CA-7205. Hillsborough Deputy Christopher E. Brown, and Major
James Livingston, provided evidence that you and Judge Cook falsified the record of the hearing.
As in Terry, Judge Cooks collaboration came relatively cheap, $300 in her initial 2002
bid, according to Florida donation records of you and Messrs. Cook and Alpert - $100 each. An
honest services fraud agreement need not spell out which payments control which act, just that
Judge Cook was expected to act favorably to the donor as opportunities arose. Terry at p. 6.
Unfortunately, Judge Cook acted like your marionette. Terry at p. 11.
Part 3, Three Formulations of the Nexus Requirement in Reasonable Accommodations
Law, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1392 (2013) gave me language to explain my disability to the Court.
This Note only came to my attention March 21, 2013 via an email subscription.
Much of my accommodation was need due to Mr. Rodems S.O.B. Litigator style that went
beyond zealous advocacy, and was abusive behavior, harassment, obstruction of justice, and part
of a scheme or artifice to defraud me of the intangible right of honest services.
Unfortunately the lower courts negligently failed their role of establishing proper conduct for
Mr. Rodems. Respondent Court Counsel David Rowland wrote July 9, 2010: (Appendix C)
This is a response to your July 6, 2010 ADA request for accommodation directed to
Gonzalo Casares, the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit ADA Coordinator. You request the same
ADA accommodations previously submitted on February 19, 2010. Your February 19,
2010 ADA request was a request for the court to take the following case management
actions: (Only 1 and 4 are relevant on this point)
1. Stop Mr. Rodems' behavior directed toward you that is aggravating your post traumatic
stress syndrome. (sic)
4. Enforce Judge Isom's directives imposed on February 5, 2007 which require both
parties to only address each other by surname when communicating about this case and
require parties to communicate in writing instead of telephone calls.
Mr. Rowlands statement is an admission that I have Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
and that Mr. Rodems behavior was directed toward me to aggravate my PTSD. The undisputed
allegation shows Mr. Rodems harassed me, which behavior was a crime under section F.S.
784.048(4) because he violated a prior court-imposed prohibition of conduct by Judge Isom, a
course of harassing conduct directed to me, that aggravated my disability, intentionally inflicted
on me severe emotional distress, and served no legitimate purpose. Because an attorney is an
officer of the court, injunctive relief was appropriate. F.S. 784.0485.
Attorney is an officer of the court and an essential component of
the administration of justice, and, as such, his conduct is subject to
judicial supervision and scrutiny. State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Evans.
Disability statutes provide little guidance to the judges who must decide whether [an
accommodation]...is an innovative accommodation...or a clever way of gaming...and whether
[the accommodation]...is genuinely related to the disabling aspects of posttraumatic stress
disorder. (id. 1392). Here the accommodation sought was genuinely related to the disabling
aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder, and accompanying depression. Unfortunately no
medically qualified court personnel reviewed my disability request.
Finally, the Supreme Court is not infallible, see Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), and Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944).
The Florida Bar
Regarding your claim that The Florida Bar rejected your grievance against me as unfounded, I
disputed this finding by email April 14, 2013 to ABA President Laurel Bellows, with copies to
those on the ABA and Florida Bar service lists, and the Sixth Circuit Grievance Committee D.
One reader, who has a law degree, commented on my email and wrote:
Look, Neil. These people are criminals. I suggest you file a criminal complaint with a US
Attorney or FBI
Shortly I will submit a comprehensive response to Florida Bar President Gwynne Young.
Pursuant to Fla. Bar Rule 3-7.3(a), Bar Counsel Theodore P. Littlewood reviewed my complaint
against you, and determined that the alleged conduct, if proven, would constitute a violation of
the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar warranting the imposition of discipline. Mr. Littlewood
opened disciplinary File No. 2013-10,271 (13E) pursuant to Fla. Bar Rule 3-7.3(b), notified you
in writing, conducted an investigation, considered your response, my rebuttal and addendum, and
concluded the complaint warranted further consideration. On October 26, 2012 Mr. Littlewood
advised you by letter that the matter has been forwarded to The Florida Bar's Tampa Branch
Office for consideration.
Mr. Littlewood should be commended for his professionalism in conducting the initial review as
required and in compliance with The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.
Unfortunately The Florida Bar's Tampa Branch Office is a crony local discipline component as
describe by the ABA McKay Report.
Local components, such as local bar investigative committees, foster cronyism
as well as prejudice against unpopular respondents. - ABA McKay Report
Local discipline components are a fatal defect in The Florida Bars lawyer discipline system.
Susan V. Bloemendaal was then, and is today, Chief Branch Discipline Counsel for the Tampa
Branch Office. Unfortunately Ms. Bloemendaal has provided you protection since my initial
complaint. On June 21, 2004 the Florida Bar assigned my initial complaint to Assistant Staff
Counsel William L. Thompson who opened TFB No. 2004-11,734(13C). Mr. Thompson
diligently investigated my complaint, but after six months he was removed from the inquiry.
Susan Bloemendaal personally assumed investigation of my complaint, instead of assigning it to
another Assistant Staff Counsel as usually happens. Ms. Bloemendaal soon closed the file, and
notified me of the case closure by letter February 9, 2005, stating in part:
Mr. Gillespie, the bar has carefully reviewed all the information and documents provided
by you and Mr. Cook. Based upon this review, it is the bar's position that the objective
evidence is insufficient to support a finding of misconduct behalf of Mr. Cook.
Henceforth Ms. Bloemendaal assigned my subsequent complaints to Troy Matthew Lovell, who
is now Lead Attorney for the Tampa office of The Florida Bar. Mr. Lovell refused to honestly
consider my complaints, and continued to provide protection for Barker, Rodems & Cook.
For example, my complaint of August 5, 2006 alleged on page 2, 3 that the Closing Statement
did not comply with Bar Rule 4-1.5(f)(5) in that no costs or expenses were itemized, and
payment of $2,544.79 to Mr. Alpert was not shown. Mr. Cook claimed that he was exempt from
Rule 4-1.5(f)(5) because Amscot separately paid $50,000.00 to compensate my attorneys for
their claim against Amscot for court-awarded fees and costs. Mr. Cooks assertion was just a
perpetuation of his original fraud. First, the claim to $50,000 in court-awarded fees and costs was
rejected by Judge Nielsen by Order entered January 13, 2006. Second, there is no exemption to
the Rule 4-1.5(f)(5) requirement of to itemize costs and expenses even if paid separately.
Mr. Lovell immediately closed my complaint by letter August 8, 2006, just three days after I
submitted the complaint August 5, 2006. Mr. Lovell wrote:
Assuming all of these allegations are true, we nevertheless conclude that further
proceedings are unwarranted. Your case presents certain unusual situationsSimilarly,
your complaints about the itemization of fees and costs do not merit further
proceedings.We acknowledge that the language of the rule could be interpreted more
broadly, but undersigned Bar counsel is unaware of any binding precedent adopting that
interpretation.We further note that these supplemental issues have been raised in a civil
matter you have brought against Respondent's law firm. The Supreme Court of Florida
has made clear that the attorney disciplinary process is not a substitute for civil court in
seeking remedies against attorneys for civil claims.
In this case, there is no arguable basis on which you were harmed by the events you
described...
Similarly, your complaints about the itemization of fees and costs do not merit further
proceedings. The purpose of the rule in question is to address fees and costs which were
paid out of the settlement proceeds you received. No monies were paid out of your
settlement. We acknowledge that the language of the rule could be interpreted more
broadly, but undersigned Bar counsel is unaware of any binding precedent adopting that
interpretation. Given that you received 100% of the proceeds of your settlement, we find
no basis for disciplining Respondent for the content of the closing statement. Similarly,
the purpose of the rule about disclosing payments is for transparency, to prevent secret
arrangements between attorneys when clients do not realize how their fees are being
shared.
Mr. Lovells claim that I received 100% of the proceeds of my settlement, or that No monies
were paid out of your settlement, is a dishonest assessment in conflict with a lawyers fiduciary
duty to a client. Under Bar Rule 4-1.5(f) on contingent fees, me and the other 2 plaintiffs would
have done far better to collect our rightful settlement share of $9,143 each, and pay attorneys
fees to BRC of $28,569. Each plaintiff would have an additional $7,143 under Bar Rule 4-1.5(f).
If the purpose of the rule is for transparency, then itemization of the actual costs and expenses
paid would have prevented Mr. Cook from using a fraudulent Closing Statement to steal $7,143
from me and each of the other 2 plaintiffs. Attorney Seldon Childers determined that Mr. Cook
stole $7,143 from my settlement, not $6,224.68 claimed in my original pro se Complaint, see Mr.
Childers Economic Analysis Spreadsheet dated September 17, 2009.
Attorney Robert Bauer believed I was entitled to a contingent fee share of the $56,000 total
recovery, which was the basis for his representation of my claims in 05-CA-7205. Mr. Bauer
outlined your fraud to Judge Barton October 30, 2007 during a hearing for judgment on the
pleadings: (Transcript, October 30, 2007, pp.39-40)
22 [MR. BAUER] Another issue to point out the fact this is for
23 their claim of court-awarded attorney's fees, there
24 was no claim. The claim had already been determined
25 by the court, denied. It didn't exist any more.
1 [MR. BAUER] Yes, there was an appeal outstanding, but that
2 doesn't resurrect any claim. The only thing that's
3 going to resurrect a claim is an overruling by the
4 appellate court. A claim no longer exist once it's
5 been denied, even if it's on appeal. So in
6 asserting there existed a claim for attorney's fees
7 is false. It - it's not there.
And Judge Nielsen entered an Order January 13, 2006 that established a cause of action for fraud
and breach of contract against Mr. Cook and BRC. Judge Nielsen rejected your claim to
$50,000 in court-awarded fees and costs. The matter was decided res judicata January 13, 2006.
In concluding my Bar complaint of August 5, 2006, I cited the following case law:
Failing to provide clients with written fee agreement and failing to itemize costs in a
closing statement warrants one year suspension. (The Florida Bar v. Rood, 633 S02d 7
(1994). Attorneys must strictly comply with disciplinary rule requiring consent of client
in writing in contingency cases, along with similar rules requiring client's written consent
to attorney's fee regardless of circumstances involved. (The Florida Bar v. Carson, 737
So.2d 1069 (1999), rehearing denied). Securing fees by intentional misrepresentation or
fraud upon client or court warrants two year suspension from practice of law when it is
apparently isolated ethical breach in the context of fee dispute. (The Florida Bar v.
Garland, 651 So.2d 1182 (1995).
Unfortunately Mr. Lovell refused to follow the above case law in closing my Bar complaint, and
refused to acknowledge that I suffered harm, the loss of $7,143 in settlement proceeds.
The Tampa Branch Office has continued to protect you, by and through Ms. Bloemendaal, then
Mr. Lovell, and now by and through Bar Counsel Leonard E. Clark, Michael G. Stofer, Chair of
the Sixth Circuit Grievance Committee D, and Sandra Fascell Diamond, Designated Reviewer.
The letter report does not specifically respond to any of my allegations, and falsely states
Furthermore, many of the allegations related to alleged conduct that occurred in 2005 and 2006.
Thus, these allegations are outside the Bar's time limitations to prosecute a case. This is
nonsense, because my complaint focused on misconduct that occurred in 2010 and 2011.
References to earlier events were for historical reference, or in reply to your response.
My Bar complaint alleged you and Judge Cook collaborated September 28, 2010 and created a
false record of the hearing on final summary judgment and civil contempt. This was a scheme or
artifice to defraud me of the intangible right of honest services, as alleged in my Rule 21 Motion
for leave to correct and supplement the petition for rehearing in Petition No. 12-7747.
In 2011 you made a number of false representations to Judge Arnold to obtain a civil arrest
warrant on a writ of bodily attachment. You also failed to cooperate with Mr. Bauer, and Mr.
Castagliuolo. None of that is mentioned in the letter report, as required by Rule 3-7.3(d).
Unfortunately Mr. Rodems, The Florida Bar has given you a pass on every complaint made
against you by me, the persons shown below, and likely many more complaints unknown to me.
Robert Cash v. Ryan Christopher Rodems, RFA No. 12-15330
Carl Montag v. Ryan Christopher Rodems, TFB No. 2012-10,734 (13E)
Rita Pesci v. Ryan Christopher Rodems, TFB No. 2006-10,278(13D)
Heike Albert v. Ryan Christopher Rodems, RFA No. 12-14,769
Roslyn Vasquez v. Ryan Christopher Rodems, TFB No. 2003-11,462(13A)
Mr. Rodems, the lawyer discipline system in Florida is catastrophically broken. The Florida Bar
itself has conducted a survey of judges who have filed bar complaints against lawyers with the
results published in the Hawkins Report, showing statistical proof of governmental ineptitude:
Nearly three-fifths (58%) of judge respondents say they are dissatisfied with the disciplinary
job The Bar has done. A staggering 82% of all county, circuit, and appellate judges in the most
populous District (the Third DCA) are dissatisfied with the job The Florida Bar is doing.
In Broward County the level of judicial dissatisfaction is an appalling 65%. This is the county in
which Scott Rothstein served on a Florida Bar grievance committee, and was a Commissioner on
the Fourth Appellate District Judicial Nomination Commission, while operating a $1.2 billion
dollar Ponzi scheme from the law offices of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A. right under the
Bars nose, to which he plead guilty and on June 9, 2010 received a 50-year prison sentence.
Tellingly, the indictment of The Florida Bar revealed in the Hawkins Report is from judges who
filed complaints. The general publics experience and level of dissatisfaction with Bar discipline
is worse, based on my discussions with people who made Bar complaints.
In conclusion, there is no need, as you suggested, to post on my website whatever you
purportedly attached to your unwanted, harassing email. First, my website and blog are linked to
the Supreme Court docket page, allowing readers to see the decision directly.
Second, Petition No. 12-7747, and all the supporting documents, will be preserved by the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), along with all other denied petitions
submitted in forma pauperis. Paid petitions which are denied go to the Library of Congress.
Thus Mr. Rodems, this matter is forever documented by the National Archives, the agency of the
United States charged with preserving and documenting government and historical records.
Mr. Rodems, this case is over. Move on with your life. Do not contact me again.
Sincerely,
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
cc: ABA email service list; Florida Bar email service list; Thirteenth Circuit JNC; Sixth Circuit
Grievance Committee D; Office of the Florida Attorney General; and the Governor of Florida.

Neil Gillespie
From: "Ryan Rodems" <Rodems@barkerrodemsandcook.com>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:32 AM
Attach: Ltr Denying Gillespie motion for rehearing 4-15-2013.pdf; Finding of No Probable Cause [Gillespie
Complaint] [Fla Bar No. 2013-10,271 (6D).pdf
Subject: Supreme Court letter denying your motion for rehearing and Florida Bar rejecting your grievance -- no
probable cause
Page 1 of 1
4/19/2013
Neil:

The United States Supreme Court rejected your petition for writ of certiorari, and your motion for
rehearing on that. The Florida Bar rejected your grievance against me as unfounded. I am sending you
copies for your records, and you have my permission to post them on your website.

Sincerely,

813/489-1001 (Office)
813/205-1198 (Mobile)
E-mail: rodems@barkerrodemsandcook.com

NOTICE: This message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act,
18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended to be confidential, and is also protected by the attorney-client
privilege or other privilege. It is not intended for review or use by third parties or unintended recipients. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to delete the data and destroy any physical copies.
Any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

VIAUPSNo. lZ64589FNY95401485 December11, 2013
VirlindiaA. Doss,ExecutiveDirector
FloridaCommissiononEthics
325 JohnKnoxRoad
BuildingE, Suite200
Tallahassee,FL32303
DearMs. Doss:
Thisletterandenclosuresareto supplementtheethicscomplaintsIfiledMonday. Pleasefind
enclosedthefollowing:
PetitionNo. 12-7747,writofcertiorari,U.S. SupremeCourt
NeilJ. Gillespiev. ThirteenthJudicialCircuitFloridaetal
DeniedFebruary19,2013;rehearingdeniedApril 15,2013
Guideto PetitionNo. 12-7747,withCD-ROMofalldocuments
PetitionNo. 13-7280,writofcertiorari,U.S. SupremeCourt
NeilJ. Gillespiev. ReverseMortgageServices,Inc. etal
FiledOctober23,2013;docketedNovember8, 2013;responsesdueDecember9,2013
Con1plaint,FloridaCommissiononHumanRelations, December10, 2013
UPLInvestigation,YolandaMartinez,No. 20143031 (9A),December5,2013
FloridaBarinvestigation,DanielleParsons,No. 2014-30,535 (9A), December6,2013
ConsolidatedAmendedMotionforDisabilityAccommodation,Waiverof
Confidentiality,MotionforDeclaratoryJudgment,AppointGuardianAdLitem;Notice,
Pro SeE-filingProhibitionbyDistrictCourt;AffidavitofConflict,Denialof ADA
Accommodation,byHillsboroughJudgeClaudiaR. Isom. (C.A.ll 12-11213, 12-11028)
Note: ExhibitsfortheDisabilitydocumentsareintheCD-ROM,PetitionNo. 12-7747.
Telephone: 352-854-7807
Enclosures
MorganR. Bentley
Chair
MichelleAnchors
MatthewF. Carlucci
I.MartinFord
Tom Freeman
SusanHorovitzMaurer
LindaMcKeeRobison
StanleyM.Weston
StateofFlorida
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O.Drawer15709
325JohnKnoxRoad
BuildingE,Suite200
December17,2013
VirlindiaDoss
Executive Director
General CounseV
(850)488-7864Phone
(850)488-3077(FAX)
CERTIFIEDMAIL
TheHonorablePamelaBondi
PL-O1,TheCapitol
Confidential
Tallahassee,FL 32399-1050
RE: ComplaintNo. 13-201,InrePAMELAJOBONDI
addressunlessotherwisenotifiedofachangeinyouraddress. Thistransmittalisaroutine
judgment of the complaint, either as toits terminology or merits.
Commissionthatsuchrecordsbemadepublicoruntilthecomplaintreachesastagein the
complainttomembersofthepublicorthepress,solongasthecomplaintremainsina
thattime.
PAMELA JO BONDI
Page 2
December 17, 2013
requires that the Commission decide whether the law actually was violated aIld, if so, whether a
occurred.

Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
Enclosure
MorganR.Bentley
Chair
MichelleAnchors
MatthewF.Carlucci
I.MartinFord
TomFreeman
SusanHorovitzMaurer
LindaMcKeeRobison
StanleyM. Weston
StateofFlorida
COMMISSIONONETIDCS
P.o.Drawer15709
325JohnKnoxRoad
BuildingE,Suite200
December17,2013
VirlindiaDoss
Executive Director
General CounseV
(850)488-7864Phone
(850)488-3077(FAX)
CERTIFIEDMAIL
Ms.DianaR. Esposito
501 E. KennedyBlvd.,Ste. 1100
Tampa,FL 33602
Confidential
RE: ComplaintNo. 13-202,In reDIANAR. ESPOSITO
DearMs.Esposito:
Theabove-captionedcomplaint,recentlyreceivedintheofficeof theCommissiononEthics,is
addressunlessotherwisenotifiedof achangeinyouraddress. Thistransmittalisaroutine
judgmentof thecomplaint,eitherastoitsterminologyormerits.
Commissionthatsuchrecordsbemadepublicoruntilthecomplaintreachesastageinthe
confidentialityfronlyou,ourofficeisnotfreetoreleaseanydocumentsortocomnlentonthis
complainttomembersof thepublicorthepress,solongasthecomplaintremainsina
Thefollowinginfonnationissubmittedtoaidyouinunderstandingthereviewthatacomplaint
maygothroughundertheCommission'srules. Thefirststageinourcompl,aintprocessisa
theyindicateapossibleviolationofanylawoverwhichtheCommissionhasjurisdiction. If the
thattime. ~ > ...-
DIANA R. ESPOSITO
Page 2
December 17, 2013
financial disclosure fonns, a determination will be made as to whether the errores) or
omissions(s) are significant to investigate. If the error(s) or omissions(s) are detennined to be
by the investigative staff ofthe Commission. The next stage of the Commission's proceedings
If the Commission fmds that there is no probable cause to believe that there has been a violation
requires that the Commission decide whether the law actually was violated and, if so, whether a
(trial) at which evidence would be presented, or the Commission may order tllat such a hearing
occurred.
to access our website at www.ethics.state.t1.us. where you will find publications, rules, and other
infonnation. If there are any questions concerning this complaint or the procedures being

Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
Enclosure
MorganR.Bentley
Chair
MichelleAnchors
MatthewF.Carlucci
I.MartinFord
TomFreeman
SusanHorovitzMaurer
LindaMcKeeRobison
StanleyM.Weston
Stateof Florida
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O.Drawer15709
325JohnKnoxRoad
BuildingE,Suite200
December17,2013
VirlindiaDoss
Executive Director
General CounseV
(850)488-7864Phone
(850)488-3077(FAX)
CERTIFIEDMAIL
Mr. KennethV. Wilson
CivilLitigationBureau
501 E. KennedyBlvd.
Confidential
Tampa,FL 33602
RE: ComplaintNo. 13-203,In reKENNETHV. WILSON
DearMr.Wilson:
beingtransmittedtoyoupursuanttotherequirenlentsofSection112.324,FloridaStatutes. This
officewillforwardallfuturecorrespondenceinthismattertoyouattheabove-listedmailing
determinationof whethertheallegationsofthecomplaintarelegallysufficient,thatis,whether
theyindicateapossibleviolationof anylawoverwhichtheCommissionhasjurisdiction. If the
thattime.
Kenneth V. Wilson
Page 2
December 17, 2013
involves the preliminary investigation of the complaint and a decision by the Commission of
whether there is probable cause to believe that there has been a violation of any ofthe ethics
of the ethics laws, the conlplaint will be dismissed and will become public at that time.
occurred.
/-

Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
Enclosure
MorganR.Bentley
Chair
MichelleAnchors
MatthewF.Carlucci
I. MartinFord
TomFreeman
SusanHorovitzMaurer
LindaMcKeeRobison
StanleyM. Weston
StateofFlorida
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O.Drawer15709
325JohnKnoxRoad
BuildingE,Suite200
December17,2013
VirlindiaDoss
Executive Director
General CounseV
(850)488-7864Phone
(850)488-3077(FAX)
CERTIFIEDMAIL
Ms.ValerieWilliford
Tampa,FL 33602
Confidential
RE: ComplaintNo. 13-204,In reVALERIEWILLIFORD
DearMs. Williford:
determination of whether the allegationsofthe complaint arelegally sufficient, that is,whether
dismissedwithoutinvestigationandallrecordsrelatingtothecomplaintwillbeconlepublicat
thattime.
VALERIE WILLIFORD
Page 2
December 17, 2013
financial disclosure forms, a determination will be made as to whether the error(s) or
occurred.
/, r)

Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
Enclosure
MorganR. Bentley
Chair
MichelleAnchors
MatthewF.Carlucci
I.MartinFord
TomFreeman
SusanHorovitzMaurer
LindaMcKeeRobison
StanleyM.Weston
StateofFlorida
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O.Drawer15709
325JohnKnoxRoad
BuDdingE,Suite200
December17,2013
VirlindiaDoss
Executive Director
General CounseV
(850)488-7864Phone
(850)488-3077(FAX)
CERTIFIEDMAIL
Ms.LauraMartin
Confidential
Tampa,FL 33602
RE: ComplaintNo. 13-205,InreLAURAMARTIN
DearMs.Martin:
determination of whether the allegationsof the complaint arelegally sufficient, that is, whether
thattime.
LAURA MARTIN
Page 2
December 17, 2013
involves the prelinlinary investigation of the complaint and a decision by the Commission of
ofthe ethics laws, the complaint will be dismissed-and will become public at that time.
occurred.
Sincerely, ~
r ~ ~
Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
Enclosure
MorganR.Bentley
Chair
MichelleAnchors
MatthewF.Carlucci
I.MartinFord
TomFreeman
SusanHorovitzMaurer
LindaMcKeeRobison
StanleyM.Weston
StateofFlorida
COMMISSIONONETIDCS
P.O.Drawer15709
325JohnKnoxRoad
BuildingE,Suite200
December17,2013
VirlindiaDoss
Executive Director
General CounseV
(850)488-7864Phone
(850)488-3077(FAX)
CERTIFIEDMAIL
RETURN RECEIPTREQUESTED
Mr.DavidA.Rowland
800E. TwiggsSt.,Ste.603
Tampa,FL 33602
Confidential
RE: ComplaintNo. 13-206,In reDAVIDA.ROWLAND
DearMr.Rowland:
Pleasenotethatthiscomplaint,aswellasalloftheCommission'sproceedingsandrecords
thattime.
DAVID A. ROWLAND
Page 2
December 17, 2013
omissions(s) are significant to investigate. If the errores) or omissions(s) are determined to be
correction is nlade, the complaint will advance to the next step in the process.
ofthe ethics laws, the complaint will be dismissed and will become public at that time.
occurred.
to access our website at www.ethics.state.f1.us. where you will find publications, rules, and other
Sincerely, ~
~ o J h
Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
Enclosure
MorganR.Bentley
Chair
MichelleAnchors
MatthewF.Carlucci
I. MartinFord
TomFreeman
SusanHorovitzMaurer
LindaMcKeeRobison
StanleyM.Weston
StateofFlorida
COMMISSIONONETHICS
P.O.Drawer15709
325JohnKnoxRoad
BuildingE,Suite200
December17,2013
VirlindiaDoss
Executive Director
General CounseV
(850)488-7864Phone
(850)488-3077(FAX)
CERTIFIEDMAIL
Ms.SandraBurge
800E. TwiggsSt.,Ste.603
Confidential
Tampa,FL 33602
RE: ComplaintNo. 13-207,In re SANDRABURGE
DearMs. Burge:
addressunlessotherwisenotifiedofachangeinyouraddress. ThistransmittalisarOlltine
determination of whether theallegationsofthecomplaintarelegallysufficient,thatis,whether
thattime.
SANDRA BURGE
Page 2
December 17, 2013
by the investigative staff ofthe Commission. The next stage of the Commission's proceedings
occurred.
You are entitled to be represented by legal cOWlsel during our proceedings. Upon written
Sincerely,
~ ~
Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
Enclosure

Attorney General Pam Bondi Ethics Complaint No. 13-201 Dismissed

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Attorney General Pam Bondi Ethics Complaint No. 13-201 Dismissed

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

MorganR.

Potrebbero piacerti anche