Social Science & Medicine 75 (2012) 2116e2123

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Social Science & Medicine

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/socscimed

Discrimination and psychological distress: Does Whiteness matter for Arab Americans?
Sawsan Abdulrahim a, *, Sherman A. James b, Rouham Yamout a, Wayne Baker c
a

Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, United States c Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, United States
b

a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history: Available online 8 August 2012 Keywords: Discrimination Psychological distress Whiteness Arab Americans United States

a b s t r a c t
The white racial category in the U.S. encompasses persons who have Arab ancestry. Arab Americans, however, have always occupied a precarious position in relationship to Whiteness. This study examined differences in reporting racial/ethnic discrimination among Arab Americans. It also investigated whether and how the association between discrimination and psychological distress varies by characteristics that capture an Arab Americans proximity to/distance from Whiteness. We used data from the Detroit Arab American Study (2003; n 1016), which includes measures of discrimination and the Kessler-10 scale of psychological distress. A series of logistic regression models were specied to test the discrimination epsychological distress association, stratied by ve measures that capture Whiteness e subjective racial identication, religion, skin color, ethnic centrality, and residence in the ethnic enclave. Discrimination was more frequently reported by Muslim Arab Americans, those who racially identify as nonwhite, and who live in the ethnic enclave. Conversely, the association between discrimination and psychological distress was stronger for Christian Arab Americans, those who racially identify as white, who have dark skin color, and who live outside the ethnic enclave. Even though Arab Americans who occupy an identity location close to Whiteness are less subjected to discrimination, they are more negatively affected by it. The ndings illuminate the complex pathways through which discrimination associates with psychological distress among white immigrants. Further research on discrimination and health among Arab Americans can help unpack the white racial category and deconstruct Whiteness. 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Introduction Discrimination has received increasing recognition as one of the main mechanisms to explain racial and ethnic inequities in health in the United States (U.S.) (Gee & Ford, 2011; Williams & Mohammed, 2009). Racial/ethnic discrimination is a chronic stressor that arouses physiological responses such as anger, frustration, and helplessness. These stress responses, in turn, affect health directly through immune, neuroendocrine, and cardiovascular mechanisms, or indirectly through psychological coping mechanisms (Clark, Anderson, Clark, & Williams, 1999). The exponential growth in the number of empirical studies on discrimination and health over the last two decades has led to the publication of exhaustive reviews on the subject (Krieger, 1999; Paradies, 2006; Williams & Mohammed, 2009; Williams, Neighbors, & Jackson,

* Corresponding author. Tel.: 961 (0) 1 350 000; fax: 961 (0) 1 744 470. E-mail address: sawsana@aub.edu.lb (S. Abdulrahim). 0277-9536/$ e see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.030

2003). These reviews highlight three main themes. First, ample evidence supports the presence of a positive association between discrimination and poor health. Second, though there is empirical support for the link between discrimination and hypertension, low birth weight, and self-rated health; the strongest evidence corroborates the effect of discrimination on mental health and psychological distress. Third, the association between discrimination and poor health is conditional, whereby its strength varies by individual, group identity, and contextual inuences. Research has sought to examine how sources of individual variability, such as coping style and racial centrality, can intensify or mitigate the discriminationehealth association. Personal coping responses can range from passively accepting a discriminatory situation to actively confronting it. Studies on discrimination, coping, and health have yielded mixed evidence showing that, whereas active coping generally mitigates the harmful effects of discrimination, it can also precipitate poor health outcomes (Clark et al., 1999; James, Hartnett, & Kalsbeek, 1983; Noh, Beiser, Kaspar, Hou, & Rummens, 1995; Paradies, 2006; Williams, Yu, Jackson, &

S. Abdulrahim et al. / Social Science & Medicine 75 (2012) 2116e2123

2117

Anderson, 1997). Racial centrality, a construct which captures the strength of positive identication with ones racial group, has been reported to play a role in buffering the discriminationehealth association. For example, Sellers and Shelton (2003) found that African Americans who view their race as a central component of their identity are less negatively affected by discrimination. Similar ndings from research on other racialized groups support the importance of racial/ethnic centrality in relieving the pernicious health consequences of discrimination (Mossakowski, 2003; Walters & Simoni, 2002). In addition to coping style and racial centrality, racialization based on phenotype has received limited attention in research on discrimination and health. In many cultures, dark skin tone is negatively stereotyped and darker skinned people experience more discrimination. In the U.S., Caribbean Hispanics who are racialized as Black experience more structural discrimination (in the form of residential segregation) compared to Hispanics of mixed racial ancestry (Denton & Massey, 1989). Skin color also exerts an effect on the life chances and social mobility of immigrants in the U.S., with evidence from the New Immigrant Survey showing that lightest skin immigrants of any background report 17% higher wages compared to those who have dark skin (Hersch, 2008). Evidence supporting the mediating effect of skin color on the discriminationehealth association is scant and has primarily focused on hypertension (Klonoff & Landrine, 2000). One study by Borrell and colleagues, however, examined how discrimination and skin color interact to inuence the self-rated and mental health of African Americans (Borrell, Kiefe, Williams, Diez-Roux, & GordonLarsen, 2006). Even though their ndings did not reveal a skin color effect, the study nonetheless evoked the important question of whether and how this phenotypic characteristic may modify the discriminationehealth association. In the U.S., much of the conceptual knowledge on racial/ethnic discrimination and its complex association with health has been constructed around the experiences of African Americans and, increasingly so, Latino and Asian Americans (Gee, Ro, ShariffMarco, & Chae, 2009; Moradi & Risco, 2006; Viruell-Fuentes, 2007). This is understandable given that members of these groups have historically borne the brunt of racial oppression and continue to do so, as they negotiate blatant and subtle forms of discrimination in their daily lives. In qualitatively different ways, racial stratication also shapes the experiences of immigrant or ethnic groups who are ofcially classied as white. One such group is Arab Americans who have the option to identify as white but who hold a discursive position in relationship to U.S. racial categories. Arab Americans are highly diverse with respect to national origin, religious afliation, and socioeconomic background. The category Arab American encompasses second-generation U.S.-born citizens who may not speak Arabic and newly arrived immigrants seeking naturalization. Further, Americans of Arab ancestry exhibit diversity in how they construct racial identities. Though the Ofce of Management and Budget classies persons who have ancestry in any of the 22 Arab countries of the Middle East and North Africa as white (OMB, 1997), a signicant proportion identify as non-white (Abdulrahim, 2008; de la Cruz & Brittingham, 2003). Given this diversity, examining Arab American members differential vulnerability to discrimination and its negative health outcomes is warranted. Racial/ethnic discrimination and Arab American health Much of the research on Arab Americans adopts an acculturation framework, which assumes that the health of immigrants improves as they integrate into a white, American mainstream. This framework has come under critique in that it casts white culture as

normative and does not acknowledge the role racialization plays in impeding the social and economic integration of immigrants (Viruell-Fuentes, Miranda, & Abdulrahim, in press). Only a handful of studies have examined the impact of racial/ethnic discrimination on the health of Arab Americans. Postulating that the collective experience with discrimination in the aftermath of September 11 would have negative health consequences on Arab Americans, Lauderdales (2006) analysis of birth certicate data in California revealed that women of Arab ancestry who gave birth in the period immediately after the terrorist attacks experienced an elevated risk of poor birth outcomes. Similar ndings could not be replicated in Michigan, where there was no difference in birth outcomes of Arab American women before and after September 11 (El-Sayed, Hadley, & Galea, 2008). In fact, Arab ancestry of mother was associated with lower risk of adverse birth outcomes compared to the general population, and mothers residing in Dearborn, a city with a high Arab American concentration, exhibited a low risk for low birth weight (El-Sayed & Galea, 2010). Though the authors postulated acculturation as a plausible mechanism, the protective effects of living in an Arab ethnic enclave in buffering against the adverse health effects of discrimination may also explain this observation. One of the earliest studies examining the relationship between discrimination, coping, and health among Arab Americans showed a strong relationship between self-reported discrimination and psychological distress that was modied by sense of personal control (Moradi & Hasan, 2004). The conditional association between discrimination and psychological distress was further conrmed in a recent study by Rousseau, Hassan, Moreau, and Thombs (2011) whose results showed that Muslim Arab Canadians experienced more psychological distress associated with discrimination compared to Christian Arab Canadians (Rousseau et al., 2011). Disaggregating data on Arab Americans by religious afliation has become common practice in research studies, given the racialization of Islam since September 11 (Hagopian, 2004). Evidence highlights that Muslim Arab Americans who are assimilated into dominant society report higher levels of discrimination compared to both their less assimilated religious counterparts and to assimilated Christian Arab Americans (Awad, 2010). Whereas research has increasingly examined the buffering effects of religion and area of residence, as of yet, no study has questioned the groups white racial status or investigated how the health of an Arab American may be differentially inuenced by her/his proximity to or distance from Whiteness. Whiteness and Arab Americans An offshoot of Critical Race Theory, Whiteness studies have primarily focused on documenting the highly contested process through which European immigrant groups at the turn of the twentieth century gained white racial status (Brodkin, 1998; Ignatiev, 1995; Roediger, 2005). A historical analysis of Arab Americans relationship to U.S.-based racial categories provides a powerful indictment of race as a biological construct and exemplies a case study in Whiteness. When the right to U.S. citizenship was premised on eligibility in the white racial category, Arabic-speaking immigrants took a similar approach as European immigrants and actively appealed for inclusion in the racial hierarchy as whites. Initially, immigrants arriving to the U.S. from modern day Syria and Lebanon based their claims to Whiteness on religious arguments and advanced that, as Christians and as the mediators of Western civilization, they are naturally eligible for inclusion in the white racial category (Gualtieri, 2009; Majaj, 2000; Samhan, 1999). However, as the number of court decisions denying them citizenship increased, members of the group began to employ new arguments that explicitly separated them from Blacks and

2118

S. Abdulrahim et al. / Social Science & Medicine 75 (2012) 2116e2123

Asians. Eventually, Arab Americans became eligible for citizenship, however, after a long process of litigating their Whiteness based on connections with Christianity and distance from other groups of color. Whiteness, or the process of constructing who is white and t for U.S. citizenship, is not a historical phenomenon, but one that continues to shape notions of cultural citizenship through the racialization of immigrants (Ong, 1996). Thus, contemporary forms of racialization of Arab Americans, and Muslim Arab Americans in particular, as non-white others has received increasing attention in scholarly writings (Hagopian, 2004; Jamal & Naber, 2008; Shakir, 1997). Even before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, numerous writings highlighted the exclusion and othering of Arab Americans and advanced that, in an increasingly hostile social and political environment, the white racial category no longer reected their daily experiences (Naber, 2000; Samhan, 1999). One of the main themes in these writings is that Arab Americans are caught between two contradictory processes: racialization, through increasingly vehement stereotypes of the Arab as the quintessential other to a white American mainstream, and, simultaneously, their invisibility as part of the white racial category. Like West Indian immigrants in the U.S. who can identify racially or ethnically (Waters, 1999), Arab Americans engage in disparate racial identity formations. A qualitative study carried out in Detroit revealed heterogeneity in how members of this group interact with U.S. racial categories with some who identify as white and others who identify as non-white (Abdulrahim, 2008). How proximity to or distance from Whiteness inuences Arab Americans experiences with discrimination and its negative health effects has yet to be explored. With few exceptions (Bhopal & Donaldson, 1998; Daniels & Schulz, 2006), the white racial category has received limited attention in the literature on racial/ethnic health disparities. It is often assumed that the white category is racially neutral and groups included in it identify ethnically. In this paper, we adopt the broad term racial/ethnic discrimination to capture discrimination against Arab Americans, a group whose members identify in complex ways but who are increasingly racialized and pushed outside the boundaries of Whiteness. Scholarly works in Critical Race Theory have explicated the interconnectedness between racial and ethnic identity among immigrants who become incorporated in the U.S. as either white ethnics or racialized others (Harawa & Ford, 2009). Ethnicity differs from race in that it is not an imposed category but a social identity based on attributional dimensions (i.e., culture, language, and descent) that members of a group choose to identify with. Ethnicity, however, is similar to race in that it also encompasses a relational dimension that is shaped to a large extent by racial hierarchies (Ford & Harawa, 2010). As such, though race and ethnicity in the context of the U.S. are distinctive, they intertwine through the relational dimension of ethnicity. Even though scholarly writings have pointed out the increasing racialization of Arab Americans, empirical research on discrimination and its psychological effects is limited to a few studies that do not account for the full range of diversity in subjective racial identication in the group. This study strives to integrate a Public Health Critical Race Framework, which advances that race consciousness is a prerequisite to informed research on racial/ethnic inequities in health (Ford & Airhihenbuwa, 2010), even when conducting research on the health of immigrants who are classied as white. Thus, the present study aims to examine differences in reporting racial/ethnic discrimination among Arab Americans accounting for characteristics that capture distance from or proximity to Whiteness. It also seeks to investigate how the association between discrimination and psychological distress may vary by these

characteristics. First, we hypothesize that not all Arab Americans experience discrimination at the same level but that members who exhibit distance from Whiteness (i.e., Muslims, those who have darker skin, who identify as non-white, and who exhibit ethnic centrality and reside in the ethnic enclave) will experience more discrimination. Second, we hypothesize that racial/ethnic discrimination associates with psychological distress for all Arab Americans, but that this association will vary by characteristics that determine an individuals proximity to or distance from Whiteness. Based on the limited research ndings among Arab Americans, we hypothesize that the discriminationedistress association will be stronger for Arab Americans who are distant from Whiteness (i.e., Muslims, those who have darker skin, who identify as non-white, who exhibit ethnic centrality, and who reside in the ethnic enclave). We test these hypotheses among Arab Americans in the Detroit Metropolitan Area, and carry out our analyses adjusting for sex, age, marital status, and socioeconomic variables. Methods This paper is based on the Detroit Arab American Study (DAAS), which was carried out in 2003 in the Detroit Metropolitan Area (DMA). Population estimates of Arab Americans in the DMA vary considerably depending on data source, but range from 125,000 to more than 400,000. The DMA has a unique history with respect to early Arab immigration to the U.S. and is currently home to one of the largest and most diverse Arab American communities (Detroit Arab American Study Team, 2009). Descriptive data from the DAAS show that, compared to Arab Americans nationally, the Arab American community in the DMA is slightly older, has a larger proportion of immigrants, and is socioeconomically disadvantaged (Abdulrahim & Baker, 2009). One of the distinctive features of the DMA is the presence of an ethnic enclave in the suburb of Dearborn. Only 30% of Arab Americans in the DMA, however, reside in Dearborn while the rest reside in Detroit and other suburbs (Detroit Arab American Study Team, 2009). The Detroit Arab American Study received ethical clearance from the University of Michigan IRB. The present study is based on secondary data analysis. Data The DAAS research team sampled 1016 adults who dened themselves as of Arab or Chaldean descent residing in the DMA during the period of JulyeNovember 2003. These individuals were selected through a dual sampling frame design of an area probability and a list frame. The area-probability frame component included Census tracts with 10% or more individuals who identied as having Arab or Chaldean ancestry on the 2000 Census. This frame was established through a conventional three-stage sampling: rst, area segments were randomly chosen from the Census tracts; the second phase involved selecting household units from each of these area segments; and in the third phase, one adult resident was randomly selected from each household. The second frame was based upon pooling membership lists of 13 Arab and Chaldean American organizations. To avoid overlap, households located in area segments included in the rst frame were removed. From this master membership list, a systematic random sample of households was drawn and one adult from each selected household was randomly chosen to participate in the study. Based on both sampling frames, 4619 households were screened and 1389 were found eligible. Data collection was carried out by trained bilingual Arab American interviewers who explained to potential participants that the study was carried out by researchers at the University of Michigan. From the 1389 eligible, 1016 adults accepted to participate in the study, yielding a response rate of 73.7%.

S. Abdulrahim et al. / Social Science & Medicine 75 (2012) 2116e2123

2119

Variables The dependent variable, psychological distress, was assessed through the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K-10. The K-10 is a self-reported measure of 10 non-specic symptoms of anxiety and psychological distress. Each question was scored from 1 none of the time to 5 all of the time. For each case, the scores of the 10 questions were summed to obtain a scale from 10 to 50. The scale was dichotomized into no to low, mild, and moderate distress for those who scored below 30 and high distress for those who scored 30 or above (Andrews & Slade, 2001). Racial/ethnic discrimination, the main independent variable, was assessed through ve questions on whether the respondent or anyone in his/her household experienced, during the two years preceding the study, any of the following due to race, ethnicity, or religion: 1) verbal insults or abuse; 2) threatening words or gestures; 3) physical attack; 4) vandalism or destruction of property; and 5) loss of employment. A no answer was coded as 0 and a yes answer was coded as 1. Responses on all ve questions were summed for each case and, in bivariate and multivariable analyses, the variable was dichotomized into 0 no discrimination versus 1 at least one type of discrimination. Based on our review of the literature on discrimination and health, and scholarly writings on Arab Americans, we included ve variables available in the DAAS questionnaire that capture what we label proximity to/distance from Whiteness: racial identication, Arab American ethnic centrality, religion, skin color, and residence in the ethnic enclave. We assessed racial identication using the Census race question, which included six categories: white, black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Pacic Islander, and other. Less than two-thirds of participants (63%) selected the white racial category and 37% selected one of the other categories. The overwhelming majority of those who identied as non-white (90%) selected the other race category and 6% selected Asian (Detroit Arab American Study Team, 2009). We dichotomized this variable in the analyses into white versus non-white. Arab American Ethnic Centrality was based on an item in the questionnaire where participants were asked whether they self-identify as Arab Americans. Religious Afliation was determined asking a question in the interview where participants selected which religious category they identied with. The overwhelming majority selected either Christian or Muslim. Skin color was assessed visually and recorded by the interviewer at the end of the interview. To enhance the validity and reliability of this measure, interviewers underwent training to classify the range of skin tones of persons of Arab descent into dark, medium, or light. The assessment was visual (no tools were used) and solely based on skin tone (without considering other phenotypic characteristics). The variable was dichotomized in the analyses into dark/medium versus light. We created an area of residence variable based on whether the participants household was located in the ethnic enclave (i.e., in Dearborn, the suburb west of Detroit which has a large concentration of Arab Americans) or outside the enclave (i.e., Detroit or other suburbs). Further, we examined in bivariate analyses three variables that have been examined in immigrant health research as indicators of integration into U.S. society. First, we employed a question on place of birth in the DAAS questionnaire to create an immigrant status measure with two categories, immigrant and U.S.-born. A language preference measure was based on whether a participant completed the interview in Arabic or in English, according to her/his preference. Finally, citizenship status was assessed through a straightforward yes/no question on whether the participant is a U.S. citizen or not. In multivariate analysis, we adjusted for the following demographic and socio-economic variables: gender; age grouped into

four categories; marital status categorized into married versus widowed, separated, divorced, or never married; education dichotomized into less than high school versus high school or more; and annual household income dichotomized into less than $20,000 versus $20,000 or more. Statistical analysis To test our rst hypothesis, that some Arab Americans experience discrimination more than others, we calculated frequencies and proportions for all independent variables by racial/ethnic discrimination. Chi-square tests were employed to determine statistically signicant differences. Logistic regression was employed to test our second hypothesis that the strength of the discriminationedistress association varies by characteristics that determine an Arab Americans proximity to/distance from Whiteness. We estimated the association of psychological distress with racial/ethnic discrimination stratied by each one of the Whiteness variables, after adjusting for gender, age, marital status, education, and income. For example, to test whether the association between discrimination and distress varies by racial identication, we conducted adjusted logistic regression analyses separately for those who identied as white and those who identied as non-white. Similar analyses were carried out for the four other Whiteness variables. We tested for interactions between each of the independent variables and discrimination by running a series of logistic regression models, whereby each model included the two main effect variables (i.e., discrimination and racial identication), and the interaction term. All multivariable analyses were carried out on weighted data to account for the sample demographics and the sampling design, using SPSS, version 16. Results Table 1 presents the proportion of Arab Americans in the study who reported having experienced any form of discrimination in the two years prior to the study, due to their race, ethnicity, or religion. Almost one quarter of participants (23.6%) reported having experienced verbal insults or abuse and 13.2% reported having experienced threatening words or gestures. Less than 5% reported having experienced any of the three other types of discriminatory acts such as physical attack, vandalism or destruction of property, or loss of employment. The table further shows that 7% of participants were classied as having high distress based on their responses to the Kessler-10 scale. Findings from unweighted bivariate analyses on the association between discrimination and all other independent variables investigated conrmed our rst hypothesis that not all Arab Americans report discrimination at the same level (Table 2). Men and women did not signicantly differ in the proportion of reporting discrimination. However, a higher proportion of younger respondents, those who have a high school education or more, and
Table 1 Proportion of Arab Americans in the DAAS who reported experiencing each of ve different types of discrimination and who reported high psychological distress. % Type of discrimination Verbal insults or abuse Threatening words or gestures Physical attack Vandalism or destruction of property Loss of employment Psychological distress High distress 23.6 13.2 1.8 4.4 3.6 7.0 SE 1.33 1.06 0.42 0.64 0.58 0.80

2120

S. Abdulrahim et al. / Social Science & Medicine 75 (2012) 2116e2123

Table 2 Percent reporting at least one discriminatory experience by demographic, socioeconomic, dimensions of Whiteness, and immigrant-related variables. N Total Sex Male Female Age 18e29 30e39 40e59 60 and over Education <High school High school or more Income <20,000 20,000 or more Marital status Married Widowed, separated, divorced, never married Dimensions of Whiteness Racial identication Non-white White Ethnic centrality Yes No Religion Muslim Christian Skin color Dark/medium Light Immigrant variables Immigrant status Immigrant U.S.-born Language of interview Arabic English Citizenship status Not U.S. citizen U.S. citizen Residence Enclave Outside enclave 1016 466 538 199 254 331 214 259 754 209 665 724 292 % reporting discrimination 24.6 24.7 24.7 41.2 27.6 22.7 9.8 16.2 27.6 16.7 27.7 22.0 31.2 SE 1.35 1.36 1.36 1.56 1.41 1.32 0.94 1.16 1.40 1.26 1.51 1.30 1.45 0.987 p-value

<0.01*

<0.01*

<0.01*

<0.01*

343 666 724 289 422 579 508 493

31.2 21.5 23.6 27.0 28.4 22.1 24.0 25.4

1.46 1.29 1.33 1.39 1.42 1.31 1.35 1.37

<0.01*

0.26

Results in Table 3 show signicant and positive associations of psychological distress with racial/ethnic discrimination in the crude model (OR 3.04; 95% C.I. 1.72e5.36) and all but one of the stratied models. Examining the odds ratios and condence intervals in the stratied models reveals that the strength of the discriminationedistress association varies by characteristics that capture dimensions of Whiteness among Arab Americans. The association was signicant regardless of how an Arab American racially identied, however, it was stronger for those who identied as white (OR 3.41; 95% C.I. 1.63e7.11 versus OR 2.54; 95% C.I. 1.02e6.31 for non-white). While more Muslim Arab Americans reported discrimination (Table 2), the discriminationedistress association was signicant only for Christian Arab Americans (OR 4.41; 95% C.I. 1.87e10.41). Moreover, whereas the odds of exhibiting psychological distress associated with discrimination for Arab Americans who have light skin color were 2.83 (95% C.I. 1.25e6.41), the odds were higher for those who have dark/medium skin color (OR 3.98; 95% C.I. 1.71e9.28). The discriminationedistress association was weaker among Arab Americans who exhibited Arab American ethnic centrality (OR 2.47; 95% C.I. 1.20e5.08) than among those who did not exhibit centrality (OR 4.96; 95% C.I. 1.89e13.04). Finally, whereas a higher proportion of Arab Americans who reside in the ethnic enclave reported discrimination (Table 2), the association between discrimination and psychological distress was stronger for those who resided outside the enclave (OR 2.88; 95% C.I. 1.03e8.07 and OR 3.32; 95% C.I. 1.58e7.01, respectively). Discussion In this study, we set out to test whether Arab Americans exhibit a differential vulnerability to discrimination, and to investigate how proximity to/distance from Whiteness may condition the association between discrimination and psychological distress. Our results support the differential vulnerability hypothesis and corroborate evidence accumulated through research on other racialized groups that the discriminationedistress association is complex, nuanced, and determined by certain group characteristics. The ndings of the present study show that not all Arab Americans report discrimination at the same level, and not all those who experience discrimination are affected by it in the same way. These ndings highlight the importance of considering the multiple, and sometimes contradictory, locations Arab Americans occupy in relationship to the U.S.system of racial stratication, and call for abandoning race-neutral paradigms in research on the health of the group. Espousing
Table 3 Measures of association of psychological distress with discrimination, stratied by proximity to/distance from Whiteness characteristics, adjusting for gender, age, marital status, education, and household income. Stratication category Crude Racial identication Non white White Religion Muslim Christian Skin color Dark/medium Light Ethnic centrality Yes No Area of residence Enclave Outside enclave OR 3.04 2.54 3.41 2.22 4.41 3.98 2.83 2.47 4.96 2.88 3.32 95% C.I. 1.72e5.36* 1.02e6.31* 1.63e7.11* 0.99e4.99 1.87e10.41* 1.71e9.28* 1.25e6.41* 1.20e5.08* 1.89e13.04* 1.03e8.07* 1.58e7.01*

0.02*

0.62

732 279 442 559 203 528 296 696

21.4 33.3 20.6 27.9 25.6 19.9 30.4 21.8

1.29 1.48 1.28 1.42 1.61 1.47 1.46 1.31

<0.01*

<0.01*

0.09

<0.01*

* indicates the statistical signicance at p < 0.05 level.

those who reported a household income of $20,000 or more reported discrimination (all p values < 0.01). Further, marital status was signicantly associated, with a higher proportion of respondents who were not married at the time of the study reporting discrimination (p < 0.01). Of the Whiteness variables examined, three out of ve showed a statistically signicant association with discrimination e racial identication, religion, and residence in the ethnic enclave. Muslims reported more discrimination compared to Christians (p 0.02). A higher proportion of those who identify as non-white and those who reside in the ethnic enclave reported discrimination, compared to those who identify as white and live outside the enclave, respectively (both p values < 0.01). Neither Arab American ethnic centrality nor skin color were signicantly associated with discrimination. With respect to immigrant integration-related variables, a higher proportion of U.S.-born Arab Americans (p < 0.01) and those who completed the interview in English (p < 0.01) reported discrimination (compared to immigrants and those who completed the interview in Arabic, respectively). Citizenship status was not signicantly associated with discrimination.

* indicates the statistical signicance at p < 0.05 level.

S. Abdulrahim et al. / Social Science & Medicine 75 (2012) 2116e2123

2121

a Critical Race Theory perspective, which places race consciousness at the center of the analysis (Ford & Airhihenbuwa, 2010), these preliminary results shed light on how contemporary mechanisms of racialization may inuence the wellbeing of Arab Americans through complex mechanisms. With respect to the rst aim of the study, examining the differential vulnerability to discrimination within the Arab American community, the results of the study point to two major trends. The rst suggests that Arab Americans who are instrumentally assimilated (i.e., those who are born in the U.S., who have a preference for English, and who have higher education and income) report more discrimination than the less instrumentally assimilated. The second trend indicates that Arab Americans who exhibit distance from Whiteness e Muslims, those who racially identify as non-white, and those who reside in the ethnic enclave e report more discrimination. Consistent with the rst trend, reviews on discrimination and health have shown that higher socioeconomic position among African Americans was generally associated with increased reporting of discrimination (Paradies, 2006; Williams et al., 2003). Further, a qualitative study with Mexican American women in Detroit showed that second generation women, presumed to be more socially upwardly mobile compared to rst generation immigrant women, expressed a stronger sense of identication as a racialized other (Viruell-Fuentes, 2007). Our ndings can be interpreted in multiple ways. One possibility is that Arab immigrants may indeed experience less discrimination compared to the U.S.-born. Many immigrants proactively nurture social and professional relationships with members of their own ethnic group, so they may spend less time in mainstream spaces where they are more likely to encounter discrimination. Another interpretation is that immigrants are less able to detect discrimination, as becoming skilled in distinguishing racializing messages in the U.S. takes time. There is also the possibility that Arab immigrants may be more inclined than the U.S.-born to deny the occurrence of discrimination; conversely, they may detect it but explain it away as part and parcel of living in the U.S. as an immigrant. That Muslims report more discrimination than Christians is consistent with scholarly writings on Arab Americans (Awad, 2010; Hagopian, 2004). This is to be expected as the question of Arab Americans eligibility for U.S. citizenship was historically debated around two paradigmsereligion (that the early immigrants were Christians like Europeans) and white racial status (Gualtieri, 2009). Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, Islam came to embody the quintessential other to a white American mainstream; not surprisingly, Muslim Arab Americans in our study reported more discrimination. Further, our ndings highlight that, in the context of the DMA, living in the ethnic enclave (which may be interpreted as reecting distance from Whiteness) precipitates higher vulnerability to discrimination. Finally, even though skin color, which reects how an Arab American is perceived by others, was not associated with differential vulnerability to discrimination, the results showed that Arab Americans who subjectively identify as non-white report more discrimination. These divergent ndings are intriguing and highlight that, for Arab Americans in a post September 11 era, skin color may not be the most important marker for racialization, but that other phenotypic characteristics, dress code, or accent may be more important. The second aim of the study involved investigating how proximity to/distance from Whiteness conditions the association between racial/ethnic discrimination and psychological distress. Consistent with recent research on Arab Americans (Padela & Heisler, 2010; Rousseau et al., 2011), our study ndings provide further empirical support for the link between discrimination and poor health. More importantly, they highlight that this association

is not linear but conditioned by characteristics, which capture closeness to ones ethnic group and distance from Whiteness. Similar to research ndings among African Americans and other racialized groups (Mossakowski, 2003; Sellers & Shelton, 2003; Walters & Simoni, 2002), we found that exhibiting ethnic centrality and living in the ethnic enclave buffer the discriminationedistress association for Arab Americans. These results raise questions about paradigms, which postulate that the health of Arab Americans improves as they acculturate and join the American mainstream. Other ndings from our study further suggest the need to begin to explore how distance from Whiteness along a number of dimensions (i.e., non-white racial identication, dark skin color, and Muslim faith) attenuates the association between discrimination and health. The nding that Arab Americans who identify as white experience more discrimination-associated psychological distress is fascinating and highlights the utility of interpretations that draw on Critical Race Theory. The use of this theoretical framework in public health research calls for race consciousness as a prerequisite to examining the health of racialized immigrant groups while at the same time interrogating white privilege (Brown, 2003; Ford & Airhihenbuwa, 2010). For Arab Americans, it may be that distancing oneself from Whiteness functions as a coping mechanism and protects from the burden of daily experiences in the U.S. as not-quite-white. In this case, experiencing discrimination becomes accepted as part and parcel of living in the U.S. as a racialized other. On the other hand, the choice to self-identify as white signals that an Arab American is interested in claiming Whiteness and in drawing on its privileges. In this case, when discrimination disrupts this sense of privilege, its impact on health can be more harmful. The two other dimensions of Whiteness, religion and skin color, exhibit a similar effect on the discriminationedistress association. When Christian Arab Americans and those who have light skin experience discrimination, their health is more negatively impacted by it than Muslim Arab Americans and those who have darker skin. As negative cultural perceptions related to dark skin are prevalent in immigrants contexts of origin but take on new meanings in the U.S. (Shakir, 1997), one can postulate that Arab Americans who have dark skin may be used to experiencing discrimination in their own community. This may provide an explanation as to why their health may be less affected when they experience discrimination in mainstream spaces in the U.S. Even though the present study offers a novel approach to the study of racial/ethnic health disparities, by focusing on a white immigrant group, it is important to mention some of its methodological limitations. A main limitation is that, given the unique racial history of the DMA and the socioeconomic prole of Arab Americans in it, the results may not be generalizable to Arab Americans nationally. The association between discrimination and psychological distress may manifest differently among Arab American communities who reside in metropolitan centers in the U.S. with a different historical context. The importance of context is supported in theoretical writings on the social constructions of ethnicity in the US (Ford & Harawa, 2010), and empirical evidence showing different post-September 11 birth outcome proles of Arab American women in Michigan versus California (El-Sayed et al., 2008; Lauderdale, 2006). A second methodological limitation is the cross-sectional nature of the DAAS data, whereby measuring the independent and dependent variables simultaneously through self-reports may cause bias due to the tendency of individuals who report distress to also report discrimination. This may have led to an overestimation of effects in our study. We acknowledge this limitation but argue that it is difcult to address given the obvious ethical and methodological constraints inherent

2122

S. Abdulrahim et al. / Social Science & Medicine 75 (2012) 2116e2123 Abdulrahim, S., & Baker, W. (2009). Differences in self-rated health by immigrant status and language preference among Arab Americans in the Detroit Metropolitan Area. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 2097e2103. Andrews, G., & Slade, T. (2001). Interpreting scores on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 494e497. Awad, G. H. (2010). The impact of acculturation and religious identication on perceived discrimination for Arab/Middle Eastern Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(1), 59e67. Bhopal, R., & Donaldson, L. (1998). White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labeling in research on race, ethnicity, and health. American Journal of Public Health, 88(9), 1303e1307. Bonilla-Silva, E. (1996). Rethinking racism: toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 465e480. Borrell, L. N., Kiefe, C. I., Williams, D. R., Diez-Roux, A. V., & Gordon-Larsen, P. (2006). Self-reported health, perceived racial discrimination, and skin color in African Americans in the CARDIA study. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 1415e1427. Brodkin, K. (1998). How Jews became White folks and what that says about race in America. Rutgers University Press. Brown, T. N. (2003). Critical race theory speaks to the sociology of mental health: mental health problems produced by racial stratication. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 292e301. Clark, R., Anderson, N. B., Clark, V. R., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Racism as a stressor for African Americans. American Psychologist, 54(10), 805e816. de la Cruz, G. P., & Brittingham, A. (2003). The Arab population: 2000 (No. C2KBR-23). US Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-23.pdf. Daniels, J., & Schulz, A. J. (2006). Constructing whiteness in health disparities research. In A. J. Schulz, & L. Mullings (Eds.), Gender, race, class, and health: Intersectional approaches (pp. 89e127). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Denton, N. A., & Massey, D. S. (1989). Racial identity among Caribbean Hispanics: the effects of double minority status on residential segregation. American Sociological Review, 54, 790e808. Detroit Arab American Study Team. (2009). Citizenship and crisis: Arab Detroit after 9/11. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. El-Sayed, A., & Galea, S. (2010). Community context, acculturation, and low-birthweight risk among Arab Americans: evidence from the Arab-American birthoutcomes study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64, 155e160. El-Sayed, A., Hadley, C., & Galea, S. (2008). Birth outcomes among Arab Americans in Michigan before and after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Ethnicity & Disease, 18, 348e356. Ford, C. L., & Airhihenbuwa, C. O. (2010). The public health critical race methodology: praxis for antiracism research. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 1390e1398. Ford, C. L., & Harawa, N. T. (2010). A new conceptualization of ethnicity for social epidemiologic and health equity research. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 251e258. Gee, G. C., & Ford, C. L. (2011). Structural racism and health inequities: old issues, new directions. DuBois Review, 8(1), 115e132. Gee, G. C., Ro, A., Shariff-Marco, S., & Chae, D. (2009). Racial discrimination and health among Asian Americans: evidence, assessment, and directions for future research. Epidemiologic Reviews, 31, 130e151. Gualtieri, S. M. A. (2009). Between Arab and White: Race and ethnicity in the early Syrian American diaspora. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Hagopian, E. C. (2004). Civil rights in Peril: The targeting of Arab and Muslims. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. Harawa, N. T., & Ford, C. L. (2009). The foundation of modern racial categories and implications for research on Black/White disparities in health. Ethnicity and Disease, 19, 209e217. Hersch, J. (2008). Proling the new immigrant worker: the effects of skin color and height. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(2), 345e386. Ignatiev, N. (1995). How the Irish became White. Routledge. Jamal, A., & Naber, N. (2007). Race and Arab Americans before and after 9/11: From invisible citizens to visible subjects. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. James, S. A., Hartnett, S. A., & Kalsbeek, W. D. (1983). John Henryism and blood pressure differences among Black men. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 6, 259e278. Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, H. (2000). Is skin color a marker for racial discrimination? Explaining the skin color-hypertension relationship. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(4), 329e338. Krieger, N. (1999). Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. International Journal of Health Services, 29, 295e352. Lauderdale, D. S. (2006). Birth outcomes for Arabic-named women in California before and after September 11. Demography, 43(1), 185e201. Majaj, L. S. (2000). Arab-Americans and the meanings of race. In Postcolonial theory and the United States (pp. 320e337). University Press of Mississippi. Moradi, B., & Hasan, N. T. (2004). Arab American persons reported experiences of discrimination and mental health: the mediating role of personal control. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 418e428. Moradi, B., & Risco, C. (2006). Perceived discrimination experiences and mental health of Latina/o American persons. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 411e421. Mossakowski, K. N. (2003). Coping with perceived discrimination: does ethnic identity protect mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(3), 318e331. Naber, N. (2000). Ambiguous insiders: an investigation of Arab American invisibility. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(1), 37e61.

in the study of discrimination and health. With the exception of psychological experiments, the overwhelming majority of studies on interpersonal discrimination are based on cross-sectional and observational data (Quillian, 2006). Our study was also limited by the measures of discrimination and skin color employed. The measure of skin color was based on visual assessment by trained interviewers, which provided less reliable data compared to previous studies that used a photovolt reectance meter to measure pigmentation (Borrell et al., 2006). Further, the discrimination measure in the DAAS was based on ve questions in which a participant was asked about such experiences as verbal insults or loss of employment due to race, ethnicity, or religion. The survey instrument did not include follow-up questions to assess the frequency of discrimination (i.e., rarely versus most of the time) or the participants perception of its cause (racial, ethnic, or religious prejudice). The ve discrimination questions also do not capture some forms of discrimination which are particularly relevant to Arab Americans and which have reportedly increased in the aftermath of September 11, i.e., being watched by others or searched at airports. Because questions that capture these experiences were not included in the study questionnaire, discrimination may have been underreported, thus leading to an underestimation of effects. Finally, the self-reported nature of the discrimination measure and its focus on interpersonal experiences is a limitation. The effects of structural discrimination on the life chances and wellbeing of immigrants of color in the U.S. has received increasing attention (Bonilla-Silva, 1996; Gee & Ford, 2011), and is a subject that is ripe for investigation among Arab Americans. These limitations notwithstanding, our study provides important contributions to the discourse on racial inequities by explicitly examining the complex forms in which racial subjectivities inuence health. In a critical piece on the importance of incorporating Whiteness into health disparities research, Daniels and Schulz (2006, p. 95) argue that the disruption of the homogeneity of [W]hiteness opens up the possibility of an interrogation of white privilege. In this study, we attempted to unpack the white racial category by investigating the health effects of discrimination on Arab Americans, a group that is ofcially classied as white but whose members engage in distinct and sometimes contrasting racial identity formations. Our results show that Arab Americans who occupy an identity location close to Whiteness and who claim it, through self-identifying as white, gain some of its privileges. However, this is only half of the story, as when those who claim Whiteness experience discriminationdwhich they as privileged whites perceive to be the providence of non-whitesdtheir health is more severely affected. Conversely, Arab Americans who do not claim a white identity are more subjected to discrimination but less affected by it. It may be that those who opt out of Whiteness protect themselves from claiming a privilege that may be unceremoniously taken from them, thereby lessening the detrimental effects of discrimination. Acknowledgments S. Abdulrahim acknowledges the intellectual support of the Kellogg Health Scholars Program and the Cross-National Initiative on Migration, Place and Health. The Detroit Arab American Study was funded by the Russell Sage Foundation. References
Abdulrahim, S. (2008). Whiteness and the Arab immigrant experience. In A. Jamal, & N. Naber (Eds.), Race and Arab Americans before and after 9/11: From invisible citizens to visible subjects. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

S. Abdulrahim et al. / Social Science & Medicine 75 (2012) 2116e2123 Noh, S., Beiser, M., Kaspar, V., Hou, F., & Rummens, A. (1995). Perceived racial discrimination, coping, and depression among Asian refugees in Canada. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 193e207. OMB. (1997). Revisions to the standards for the classication of federal data on race and ethnicity. Ofce of Management and Budget Federal Register, 62(210), 58781e58790. Ong, A. (1996). Cultural citizenship as subject-making: immigrants negotiate racial and cultural boundaries in the United States. Current Anthropology, 37(5), 737e762. Padela, A. I., & Heisler, M. (2010). The association of perceived abuse and discrimination after September 11, 2001, with psychological distress, level of happiness, and health status among Arab Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 284e291. Paradies, Y. (2006). A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 888e901. Quillian, L. (2006). New approaches to understanding racial prejudice and discrimination. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 299e328. Roediger, D. R. (2005). Working toward Whiteness: How Americas immigrants became White. Basic Books. Rousseau, C., Hassan, G., Moreau, N., & Thombs, B. D. (2011). Perceived discrimination and its association with psychological distress among newly arrived immigrants before and after September 11, 2001. American Journal of Public Health, 101(5), 909e915. Samhan, H. H. (1999). Not quite white: race classication and the Arab American experience. In M. W. Suleiman (Ed.), Arabs in America: Building a new future (pp. 209e226). Temple University Press.

2123

Sellers, R. M., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). The role of racial identity in perceived racial discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1079e1092. Shakir, E. (1997). Bint Arab: Arab and Arab American women in the United States. West Port, CT: Praeger Publishers. Viruell-Fuentes, E. (2007). Beyond acculturation: immigration, discrimination, and health research among Mexicans in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1524e1535. Viruell-Fuentes, E. A., Miranda, P. Y., & Abdulrahim, S. Racialization processes, intersectionality theory, and immigrant health: moving beyond cultural explanations. Social Science & Medicine, in press. Walters, K. L., & Simoni, J. M. (2002). Reconceptualising native womens health: an indigenist stress-coping model. American Journal of Public Health, 92(4), 520e524. Waters, M. C. (1999). Black identities: West Indian immigrant dreams and American realities. Russell Sage Foundation. Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 20e47. Williams, D. R., Neighbors, H. W., & Jackson, J. S. (2003). Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: ndings from community studies. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 200e208. Williams, D. R., Yu, Y., Jackson, J., & Anderson, N. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: socioeconomic status, stress, and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 335e351.