Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
every action.
-Begins the time for things to be done, such as answer and amemdment
Rule 6: Time
(a): The day of the act will not be included in the time computation. The last day
When the period allowed is less than eleven days, sat, sun and legal holidays are
1. Rule 65(d): Intended to embody, rather than limit the court’s common law
1. A court has the power to punish with criminal contempt a person who is not a
party to the action, but who has notice and then violates the court’s order granting
injunctive relief.
2. This case is an example of how the law limits courts’ power. Certain elements
must be satisfied such as Hall actually having notice of the injunction before the
a. It’s most basic form refers to a right to be heard before being deprived
of something.
to welfare benefits
1. The amount of due process that should be given should be determined by:
2. Due process protections that should always be there in order to not violate:
e. Other protections which may include these when the factors above
erroneous deprivation
1. The determination as to how far the due process clause extends, have to look at
these factors:
a. Private interest
b. Governmental Interest
D. Access to courts
1. Boddie v. Connecticut: Indigent plaintiff’s could not get access to the courts
b. Due process protects the right of an indigent, who cannot afford to pay
court fees, to access the court when the court is the only means available
for obtaining an adjustment of a fundamental human relationship,
E. Access to counsel
1. Lassiter: Plaintiff lost her parental rights in a hearing. Court did not appoint
a. 6th amendment says that you only have a right to counsel when your
amendment.
A. Sources of law:
preservation of the status quo. The plaintiff must show that there will be an
immediate and irreparable injury, and that the loss or damage will result before
the adverse party can be heard in opposition. Very short term relief, lasts 10 days
until the end of the case. The plaintiff has to show that there will be no adequate
remedy at law, and will suffer irreparable harm if relief is not granted, that the
harm to the plaintiff will outweigh the harm to the defendant if injunction is not
granted, the likelihood that the plaintiff will prevail at trial, and how the public
will be affected.
should be granted:
1. Declaratory judgment.
2. Punitive damages
something.
5. Nominal Damage
a. Purpose: A token damage to show that harm has been done; a legal
b. Showing: Actual damage does not need to be shown, only that the
6. Attorney fees: Generally, the losing party does not pay the prevailing party’s
attorney’s fees
7. Carey v. Piphus: Plaintiff was suspended without a hearing. This violated due
process, thus, a 1983 claim. Plaintiff could not show damages, there was no
malicious intent to violate due process, thus, only nominal damages are awarded
B. Burdine: This was a Title VII employee discrimination case. The following is the
1. Plaintiff has the burden of producing the prima facie case by:
b. She applied and was qualified for a job for which the employer was
seeking applicants
d. After rejection, the position remained open and the employer continued
employment rejection.
V. Pleading Stage
A. Sources of law:
B. Complaint Requirements:
1. Sources of Law:
relief.
(e)
regardless of consistency
Rule 9:
plead in detail.
2. Dioguardi v Durning: 8(a) and 12(b)(6): Plaintiff’s are not required to plead
12(b)(6) motion can be defeated. We have notice pleading now, not fact pleading.
3. Conley v. Gibson: 8(a) and 12(b)(6): The complaint must give the defendant
fair notice of what the plaintiff’s claim is, and upon what ground the claim rests.
a. 1. This case also held that a 12(b)(6) motion should only be granted if
4. Twombley: 8(a) and 12(b)(6): The case should be dismissed if the plaintiff
Rules.
5. Leatherman: 8(a) and 9(b) and 12(b)(6): Federal courts required heightened
pleading in 1983 claims. Court said that all is required is a short and plain
statement.
excluded.
i. 9(b) tells you where there is a heightened pleading requirement,
claims.
judgment because of inconsistent claims. But, 8(e)(2) rebuts and court reverses.
C. Answering a Complaint
1. Sources of Law:
Rule 8:
(b) Must state defenses in the answer, and admit or deny all averments. If
(c) Lists the affirmative defenses that the pleader must set forth in an
meaning that more defenses exist than is listed. If these are not set forth
in the pleading, the pleader runs the risk of waiving them, subject to Rule
15.
(a)
(1)
(A) Answer must be served within 20 days after service of
1. Three theories:
harm.
mind.
judgment in 56.
before trial
scandalous matter
(g): If a party does not make one of the motions listed in (b) the first time
(h)
(1): If, the first time a party responds to a pleading, he does not
2. Bower v. Weisman: The 12(e) motion for a more definite statement shouldn’t
of subject matter jurisdiction. Court denied the motion because the defendant had
the information for almost four years. The court decided to treat it’s answer to the
not sufficiently investigated and the answer was in its own files. This disposition
is rare, and was basically done because the defendant had abused both the plaintiff
4. Controlled Environment: Rule 8(b) and 8(d): Cannot answer that you don’t
have the information. You have to answer that “you are without knowledge or
paragraph x.” Anything short of this is deemed an admission per Rule 8(d).
5. Gomez v. Toledo: The plaintiff in a 1983 case is not required to plead bad
defendant.
a. This requirement may have changed after Harlow, however, that case
duties. So the plaintiff may actually know now whether or not the
D. Amendments
1. Sources of law
Rule 15
party must obtain leave of court or consent of the adverse party. Leave shall
the adverse party to object. If the party does not object, leave shall be
prejudice.
transaction or occurrence
have both:
AND
2. Singletary: Wanted to add a party under Rule 15(c)(3). Court found it was
same to or o, but plaintiff did not show that the proposed defendant had been
notified of the action within 120 days, or that he knew or should have known but
for a mistake he would have been made a party. Thus, amendment not allowed.
b. But for a mistake: For ex.: Proposed defendant saw the complaint, and
knew that he was the one that the plaintiff was looking for, instead of Doe
or someone else.
3. Christopher v. Duffy: Lapse of years would obscure the facts necessary for the
proposed defendants to defend their case. A key witness was dead, had been eight
E. Sanctions
1. Source of Law:
Rule 11
(a): All papers presented to the court shall be signed by the attorney,
(b): When you present something to the court, you are certifying to the
circumstances that
investigation.
(4): Denials are warranted on the evidence or reasonably based on
a lack of information
(c): Sanctions: If (b) is violated, the court May impose sanctions upon
(1)
repetition of conduct.
2. Progress Fed Savings Bank: Safe harbor provision does not allow for
sanctions beyond the disposition of the case. A party shouldn’t have to fix a
1. Sources of law
(a) A party who asserts any claim can also add any other claim
that the party has against the other party (efficiency). Once
a party makes a valid claim against someone, whether under Rule
8, 13, 14, or 20, any other claims can be made at the same time.
(a): All parties may join in one action as plaintiffs if their claims
Courts may drop or add parties on its own initiative on terms that
Rule 13:
(b): Any claim against an opposing party not arising out of the
res judicata.
(h): Subject to rules 19 and 20, other parties may be made parties
to counter or cross-claims.
defendants by multiple plaintiffs, thus, according to Rule 20, all claims are valid
in one action
a. Are the issues of fact and law raised by the claim and the counterclaim
compulsory counterclaim?
1. Source of law
Rule 14
(a):
1. Defendant can assert a claim against a person not a party to the
subrogation, warranty.
2. Third party defendant may also assert any claim against the
3. The plaintiff may claim against the third party defendant if the
him.
2. Gross v. Hanover: Court must balance the benefits derived from the impleader
against the potential prejudice to the plaintiff and the third party defendants.
3. U.S. v. Olavarietta: Impleader is not allowed because while the defendant had
a claim for relief, it was not for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim against the
defendant.
VI. Discovery
A. Sources of Law
(1): Gives the requirements that each side must disclose initially
(2): Experts
(3): Pre-trial: Just before trial you must produce everything that is
information.
evidence
b. Electronically stored data can be discovered.
risky to wait until then to argue for these items because if you lose,
compel.
benefit.
(3): Trial prep materials. This rule was made due to the Hickman
anticipation of litigation
discoverable.
(5)
party can claim a protective order over items that it feels should
not be discovered. First, the party must certify to the court that it has
tried to resolve the issue with the other party. The party must then
(d): Parties may not seek discovery before the 26(f) conference
discussed.
(g): All discovery must be signed certifying that the discovery is complete
(3): The court can sanction a party who does not comply with the
Rule 30 and 31
Deponent is sworn and testifies under oath. All parties get to ask
Rule 33
Rule 34
(a): Within the scope of 26(b), a party can request any information from
(b): Procedure: This rule gives the way that a request is made.
1. It must describe items or categories of items with particularity.
to, or, the party can make a motion for a protective order.
3. The other party can then make a motion to compel under 37(a).
otherwise:
(i): Must produce the discovery in the forms that they are
to the request.
(iii): The same info need not be produced in more than one
form.
information.
or control.
Rule 36:
(a). Requests for admission: A party can request that the other party
make admissions. The request has to state what the admission will
constitute. The adverse party must answer the request to the best
party may also object and the court can compel them to answer. The party
cannot say that they lack the information necessary unless it also states
(b): Any matter is conclusively established unless the court permits its
withdrawal.
(a)
(2): The requesting party may make a motion to compel. For any
motion. This rule applies to initial discovery in 26(a) and for requests
(4)
compel.
justified.
A. Source of Law
shall exceed twenty dollars, the right to a jury trial shall be preserved.
1. Look at the issue, and decide what a comparable issue was in 1791 when the
equity courts.
This is the most important part and more or less decides the issue.
2. if issue of fact underlies both law and equity, must get a jury
A. Source of law
Rule 56
(a): A claimant can make a summary judgment motion after 20 days after
(b): Defending party can move for summary judgment at any time with or
without affidavits.
(e): Supporting and opposing affidavits need to show facts that would be
party cannot rest upon the pleadings but must set forth facts with
B. Adikes: movant is expected for his initial burden to show that there is no genuine
issue. Court required that the moving party had to “foreclose the possibility” that
C. Celotex: Moving party can fulfill it’s initial burden by pointing to the place in the
record that shows there is no genuine issue of material fact. Foreclosing the possibility is
the record, then foreclosing the possibility is unnecessary, but, if one has to
produce evidence to show no genuine issue, then one has to foreclose the
possibility.
1. Look at all evidence. If there is a dispute on a material issue of fact, then the
summary judgment
F. Strategy:
IX. Dismissal
(a)
(1):
(i): Plaintiff may file for dismissal when neither answer received
in a settlement)
(2): Except as in (1), dismissal by order of court and with terms and
conditions that court might deem necessary. If the case has gone
too far such that significant resources have been expended, then the court
judicata applies)
(d): If the plaintiff commences an action the second time, the court can order the
A. Source of law:
Rule 50
(a): A party may move for JMOL at any time after the adverse party has
(b): This is the old JNOV motion. It is a JMOL motion renewed. You
cannot make this motion after a jury’s verdict if you have not made
B. Standard of finding: If reasonable people could not disagree as to the result, then
grant JMOL.
Rule 59
(a): After there has been judgment. Says that there was some problem or
error that was serious enough that we ought to have a new trial.
This is at the discretion of the trial judge. (Judge could have made a
miscarriage of justice.
(c): The court needs to conditionally rule on the motion for a new trial at
appeal.
(d): Court can make a new trial within 10 days after entry of judgment on
party
A. Source of Law
Rule 60
B. Brandon: A motion made under 1-3 cannot be made under 6 to get around the one
year limitation.
2. Specific
A. Bifurcation typically separates a case into two potential trials, usually liability and
damages.
B. Rule 42(b): A judge can try parties separately or separate out different causes of
2. Lack of confusion
3. Judicial economy
4. Fundamental fairness
A. Remittitur: There was a trial, jury has awarded damages, defendant and judge both
agree that the damages were excessive. Judge says that the plaintiff will
voluntarily reduce the damages they receive, or the judge will order a new trial.
1. Least amount possible to bring the verdict into the range that the judge
believes is ok
2. Remit to the amount that the judge believes as reasonable jury would have
awarded.
3. Remit the greatest amount to bring the award to the smallest amount a judge
believes is rational.
B. Judge is saying: The verdict was too low and you should add damages or grant a
new trial.
1. Additurs are not allowed in federal courts but is allowed in some state courts.
XVI. ADR
A. Source of law
Rule 16
(a): Allows the court to hold pretrial conferences with a lot of different
deems necessary.
(b): After the Rule 26(f) conference between the parties, the court needs
to enter a scheduling order that limits the time to join other parties,
(c): At least one person for each party shall be able to make decisions at
the conference
(d): Final pre-trial conference. Formulation of plan for trial. Used to be
A. In Personam Jurisdiction:
1. General: Defendant can be sued in the forum state on a claim that arose
systematic contacts.
2. Specific: Defendant can only be sued on a claim that has some connection
with the forum. Boundaries are set by the Due Process Clause. Note:
Defendant must fit within the framework of the state’s long-arm statute to even begin
a. Pennoyer: State has power over people and things present within the
basis for jurisdiction from the state to the person (the likely
defendant)
served with process outside the forum state (Look to Rule 4 for
proper service).
because:
CA.
had unilaterally taken the car to OK. Defendant was not able to
reasonably foresee that he would be haled into court in OK
the consumer. The car was “consumed” in New York, not OK.
related to the claim, or arise out of the claim. Argue both. The
original language comes from Shoe which says the claim needs to
be related, but in Helicopteros, it is argued that the claim may have to arise.
2. Shaffer: Says that all forms of personal jurisdiction must go through the
minimum contacts analysis. Property is a basis for jusisdiction only when the
property is the object of the litigation, or the claim is related to the property
(which means the property was in fact the contact). Just having property in the
C. Rules
1. Rule 4(k)(1)(A) says that the federal court’s jurisdiction relies upon the
D. Consent
1. Carnival Cruise Lines: A forum selection clause was enforced by the court
rights.
1. ALS Scan:
state.
B. Notice
1. 4(c): Provides for what needs to be served, and who can make the
service.
1. Source of Law: Article III § 2 AND § 1331: Judicial power extends to all
cases arising under the constitution and the laws of the u.s.
a. Citizenship is irrelevant.
B. Diversity Jurisdiction
states
b. Complete Diversity is required: once there are citizens from the same
eliminated.
C. Supplemental Jurisdiction
a. Pendant claim: Gibbs and 1367(a): If the federal and state claims are
o), then the federal court can hear the state claim.
i. The federal claim must not have been dismissed before trial
Gibbs).
Overrules Finley.
claims against someone who was made a party by 14, 19, 20, or 24
and is non-diverse.
b. If the claims are not barred by 1367(b), then look to (a) to see if they
can be added.
b. Alpattah: If one claim has the jurisdictional minimum of 75,000, then
all other plaintiff’s joining can assert the claim if the claim
conforms to 1367(a).
3. Removal: § 1441(a): If the plaintiff has the option of filing in either federal or
state court, and opts for state court, the defendant has the option of removal if he
so chooses.
prejudice problem)
b. 1441(c): The district court may, in its discretion (use 1367(c)), remand
d. 1447: Process for remand. Motion for remand has to be filed within
XVIII. Venue
C. Transfer of venue: Under both the following statutes, the transferee must be a
proper venue and must have personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
1. § 1404(a): Transferor is proper venue: The court can transfer any action to
2. § 1406: Transferor is not proper venue: Court can dismiss or transfer to where
1. Piper: There must be an adequate alternate forum for the court to grant fnc. A
following factors for this determination are the same as for 1404,
i. Private factors:
action
A. Court congestion
at home.
action.
A. § 1652 Rules of Decision Act. Says that Federal courts sitting in Diversity must
1. Swift v. Tyson: State law as described in 1652 applies to statutes only (written
law)
federal law.
on point, then it is used in Federal court. The rules have gone through the
Enabling Act and codified the court’s power to approve the rules. Thus, unless
the rule is found to abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right, it should be
4. Not so easy Hanna: If there is no Rule on point, then look to the following for
e. Does the state court have a good reason for the rule, such as trying to
make the court accessible for all, or it helps a lot with settlement.