Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Lecture 2
GHG
Trans/multinational companies
International Energy markets
5
13000 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
World primary energy consumption grew by 2.5% in 2011, less than half the growth rate experienced in 2010 but close to the historical average. Growth decelerated for all regions and for all fuels. Oil remains the worlds leading fuel, accounting for 33.1% of global energy consumption, but this figure is the lowest share on record. Coals market share of 30.3% was the highest since 1969.
Courtesy of BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2012, BP p.l.c. Used with permission.
6
The U.S. Has Large Shares of World Energy Production & (Esp.) Consumption
Courtesy of BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2012, BP p.l.c. Used with permission.
8
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
North America
Middle East
Africa
Asia Pacific
The Asia Pacific region is the worlds largest energy consumer, accounting for 39.1% of global energy consumption and 68.6% of global coal consumption; the region also leads in oil consumption and hydroelectric generation. Europe & Eurasia is the leading region for consumption of natural gas, nuclear power, and renewables. Coal is the dominant fuel in the Asia Pacific region; natural gas is dominant in Europe & Eurasia, and oil is dominant in all other regions.
Courtesy of BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2012, BP p.l.c. Used with permission.
10
?
11
Source: EIA
12
Energy intensity
Source: EIA
13
1985
1990
14
1995
2000
2005
Source: EIA
15 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Review 2009. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2009, p. 320.
Source: EIA
16
kwh/capita
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Source: Infographic from "Ranking America."
18
Energy flow diagram for the United States in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
19
Energy flow diagram for France in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
20
Energy flow diagram for Norway in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
21
Energy flow diagram for Germany in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
22
Energy flow diagram for Japan in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
23
Energy flow diagram for Mexico in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
24
Energy flow diagram for China in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
25
Energy flow diagram for India in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
26
Energy flow diagram for Saudi Arabia in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
27
Energy flow diagram for Kenya in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
28
Energy flow diagram for Cambodia in 2007 removed due to copyright restrictions. Source: LLNL-TR-473098: 2007 Estimated International Energy Flows.
29
OECD Members: Generally Wealthy, 17.5% of 2009 World Population, 47.3% of 2009 World Energy Consumption
30
In 2009, if world had OECD (US) actual energy/capita world energy would be 2.7 (4.3) times actual feasible?
31 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2011. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2011, p. 1.
32 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2011. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2011, p. 10.
33 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2011. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2011, p. 3.
In 2008, OECD (US) accounted for 44.6% (19.3%) of total, so If world CO2/capita were OECD (US) actual, world emissions would have been 2.5 (4.3) times actual not good!
34
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2011. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2011, p. 139.
But Dont non-OECD Nations Deserve a Chance to Get Rich Like US??
35 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2011. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2011, p. 7.
Finding and moving to another growth path will be a great challenge by any standard
36
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
37