Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Overview of the presentation 1. What is the relationship between casinos and tourism? 2. What are the specifics of the Slovenian gambling market? 3. Case study: Hit-HET integrated resort casino: what went wrong?
Day-trip tourists
3. Significant tourism enhancing benefits can occur only if majority of the customers come from outside the region
Factors that influence the degree of developmental impact of casinos on a tourist destination
1 2 3 4 Casino is the additional (secondary) attraction General and gambling Out of state tourists that spend at least one night at the destination Stand alone casino, integrated resort-casino Moderate impact
Level Relative importance of casino in relation to other tourist attractions on the destination Category of visitors
Gambling
Gambling
Mostly gambling Out of state tourists that spend at least one night at the destination
Local visitors
Integrated resort-casino
No impact
Significant impact
373 311
38 60
77
298
300 250 200 150 100 50 0
15 55 72 178
264
16
21
18
25 19 60 81
34
52
85
88
2001
2002
2003 Year
2004
2005
2006
Year
2004
2005
2006
2007
20
24
28
32
C. Perla (N.Gorica) C. Park (N.Gorica) C. Korona (Kr.Gora) C. Lipica (Seana) C. Portoro (Portoro) I.S. Princess (Nova Gorica) I.S. Vrtojba (empeter pri Gorici) I.S. Paquito (Volja Draga) I. Kobarid (Kobarid) I.S. Astraea (Lipica) I.S. Larix (Kr.Gora) I.S. Gold (Seana) I.S. Karneval (kofije) I.S.Kongo (Grosuplje) I.S. Joker (Maribor) C.Ljubljana (Ljubljana) I.S. Lev (Ljubljana) C. Bled (Bled) I.S. Fortuna (Nova Gorica) I.S. Koper (Ljubljana)
Hit is the largest player with 54% market share. Two biggest casinos create 45% of all gross gaming revenues Several gambling parlors are bigger than regular casinos
Source: Office for Gaming Supervision, 2007.
120 100
Averate revenue per visitor ()
100 89 83 94
80 64 60 58 40 20 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Export-oriented Domestically-oriented 45 37 23 26 30 38 66 59 62 64 60 57 60 54 53
44
140
123 104 50 35
120
100
80
60
24
48 13
15
40
20
35
45
53 40
Gambling expenditures of foreign tourists represent 30% of total tourism service purchases
Non-specific products Connected products 6.2-Gambling 6.1-Sports and recreational sport services 5-Cultural services 3-Passanger transport services 2-Food and beverage serving services 1-Accomodation services
Basic facts about project: 1. Investment: up to 850 million 2. Hotel with 1.500 2.000 rooms 3. 3.000 slot machines 4. 120 tables 5. Plenty of other facilities 6. Full capacity in 5th year 7. 562 of total revenue in 5th year 8. 25% of non-gambling revenue 9. 3.250 employees 10. 4,4 million visitors per annum
Impact of resort on tourism sector in Slovenia: 1. 11% - 15% increase in the number of hotel rooms 2. 50% increase in total gambling capacity
1. Increase in tourism, increase in visibility and attractiveness of Slovenia as a tourist destination 2. Economic development of the region 3. Development of the economy and growth of GDP 1. Increased revenues of companies 2. Increased houshold income 3. Increase in employment 4. Increased value added 5. Increased tax income
Type of effect
Output Value added Employment Net household income Gambling privilege tax** Other taxes and contributions
** Gambling privilege tax was calculated assuming the 18% total effective tax rate.
in mio EUR
Substitution effects Impact of resort-casino Cannibalization of Hit on changes in values of Cannibalization of other casinos local communities and society as a whole? Increased social costs caused by gambling Players: Problem gambling Employees: difficult working conditions, night shifts, Most of the Society: increased crime ? social costs Increased social costs caused by mass tourism associated Strain on local infrastructure (traffic, water, ) with Damage to the environment gambling Immigration of workers as a burden on local infrastructure ? are exported abroad. Potential negative impact on other tourism sectors, associated with image of gambling destination
Problematic issues
1. Who will have majority ownership in the Hit-HET resort? Legal manipulations? In mid 2007 2. Lack of transparency letter of 3. Role of the government? intent was 4. Resort opened out a broader debate in Slovenia on signed the merits of gambling became focal point of between anger for anti-gambling interest groups Hit and HET but 5. Unrealistic business plan? was not revealed to 6. Fear of cannibalization of existing casinos the public. 7. Public opinion grew more and more negative
Opposition to gambling in general Opposition to foreigners in this sector Fear for local casino companies
Leassons learned
1. Need for open and broad public debate BEFORE the investment. 2. Need for transparency of process on all levels. 3. Need for clear objectives (strategy) from the government regarding gambling sector. 4. Government should lead the process: international public tender instead of trilateral negotiations. 5. Large foreign direct investments may be difficult in jurisdictions with well developed domestic casino industry. 6. Public opinion does matter!
In the begging of 2008 Hit and HET announced that they are stopping the negotiations
Substitution effects
Degree of substitution
Output Value added Employment Net household income Gambling privilege tax Other taxes and contributions
0%
858,2 614,9 8.944 100,0 68,7 137,6
20%
794,3 569,0 8.308 92,6 56,0 127,5
40%
730,4 523,1 7.672 85,2 43,3 117,3
60%
666,6 477,2 7.036 77,8 30,7 107,2
* Degree of substitution refers to the percentage reduction in revenues of two largest casinos in the regions, operated by the Hit. ** Gambling privilege tax was calculated assuming the 18% total effective tax rate.
1. The resort-casino is focusing on day-trip visitors. 2. Optimistic revenue projections? 3. The project is only possible in the low gambling tax rate environment. 4. Questionable merits of partnership in the joint venture. 5. The project might provoke retaliation from the other side of the border. Conclusion: Largest tourism investment, increasing total tourism revenues in the country by 15%. Benefits far outweigh the costs. Various stakeholders (negotiating parties) may influence the size of total net impacts (upwards or downwards).
Thank you!
Studies of the Slovenian gambling industries and the impact of proposed casino-resort are available at: Ministry of Finance:
http://mf.gov.si/slov/zakon/predlogi_igre_sreca.htm
and Institute for the study of gambling:
http://www.ef.uni-lj.si/enote/ipig