Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
3
International Buffalo Information Center BUFFALO BULLETIN
ISSN : 0125-6726
(IBIC)
BUFFALO BULLEITN
IBIC, KASETSART UNIVERSITY, P.O. BOX 1084
BANGKOK 10903, THAILAND
URL : http://ibic.lib.ku.ac.th
E-mail : libibic@ku.ac.th
Tel : 66-2-9428616 ext. 344
Fax : 66-2-9406688
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
A.K. Jain1, I.J. Sharma2, A. Dixit2, R.G. Agrawal3, and Y.P.S. Malik4
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
215
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
to assess the status of the mortality rate of buffalo dairy owners appeared not to be interested in rearing
calves in comparison to the cow calves, a total of the calves for economic reasons.
more than 9,000 cattle and buffaloes of all age groups The immunoglobulin levels in the sera
(viz; calves, heifers, pregnant, lactating and dry samples of pre-parturient buffaloes and cows were
animals) were included. Information about the 92.0 ± 16.0 and 126.0 ± 10.7 mg/ml, respectively,
number of breeding bulls was also collected. Data and that in post-parturient cows and buffaloes were
on the feeding of the animals in terms of the amount 149.0 ± 28.0 and 201.7 ± 10.72 mg/ml, respectively.
of concentrate mixture and roughage or green fed The immunoglobulin content in the colostrum of the
to each category of animal were collected from dairy post-parturient buffaloes was 244.0 ± 32.0 mg/ml.
owners. Feeding of colostrum and milk to the calves Immunoglobulin levels in the calves of both species
and duration of such feeding to each category of before colostrum feeding were much less (Table 4).
the calves was also noted. The birth weight, age at Six hours after colostrum feeding, the serum
maturity and status of vaccination and administration immunoglobulin levels in the calves of both the
of deworming agents were recorded. Status of the species increased significantly (P<0.05) to the levels
calf mortality in different age groups of calves and of 153.0 ± 34.0 in cow calves and to 122.0 ± 3.0
age at mortality was also noted. Management, mg/ml in buffalo calves (Table 5). In the present
particularly housing status for newly born calves as study, levels of immunoglobulin fell during about three
well as growing calves, was recorded. days of post-colostral feeding, and thereafter, they
The data collected by questionnaire were started increasing slowly and reached maximum
analyzed for mean and standard error as per levels of 115.0 ± 25.0 and 107.0 ± 25.0 mg/ml for
standard procedures. cow calves and buffalo calves, respectively.
Though the feeding and managemental
conditions appeared to be almost identical for the
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION cow calves and the buffalo calves, on average, the
mortality rate of buffalo calves was reported to be
The present investigation (Tables 1-3) more than 75% (inclusive of forced death or disposal
revealed that population of crossbred cows (718) to Kasaimandi) and that too before 1.0 to 1.5 months
was nearly 10 percent of the buffalo population of age, whereas it was only nearly 20% in case of
(7062) which indicates preference of the local cow calves.
consumers for buffalo milk. The number of breeding An earlier study found that the cow
cow bulls was 1-2 per farm whereas that of buffalo colostrum fed to the buffalo calves is beneficial to
bulls ranged between 2 and 6 per dairy farm. Both them, which indicates the presence of some
cow calves and buffalo calves were fed nearly 1.0 unidentified immunoglobulin absorptive accelerators
to 1.5 liters of colostrum daily followed by milk in a in the cow colostrum (Filteau, 2003). There appears
gradual decreasing quantity up to 30 days before to be a calf-to-calf variation in the efficiency of
introduction of calf starter. colostral immunoglobulin absorption, which also
The buffalo calves were reported to have varies with the presence of inhibitors in the colostrum
had intolerance to higher amounts of colostrum and (Filteau, 2003). The most probable reason for
to have developed diarrhoea after feeding excess mortality of the buffalo calves may be an unidentified
colostrum (Banerjee, 1998). The tolerance of buffalo deficiency in their internal defense mechanism
calves for cow colostrum was reported to be higher, (Gupta et al., 1990). It is a well established fact that
and buffalo calves did not develop diarrhoea when the internal defense (immunity) of the animals is built
fed cow colostrum. The management conditions up jointly by the blood cells, particularly the
were not optimum for the calves in commercial leucocytes, immunoglobulins and certain other
dairies, and separate calf pens were not seen in any essential elemental factors. The maternal transfer
of the dairy farms, except in the Dairy Unit of of immunoglobulin through syndesmochorial
Composite Livestock Farm, Adhartal, Jabalpur. The placenta is very low (Gupta et al., 1990). The
concentration of immunoglobulins in the colostrum
216
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
CATTLE BUFFALOES
Total surveyed population 718 7062
Bulls 1-2 / herd 2-6 / farm
Colostrum fed to the calves 1-1.5 lit. 1-1.5 lit.
Table 2. Profile of total immunoglobulin pre and post parturient cows and buffaloes.
Table 3. Profile of total immunoglobulin of neonatal cow calves and buffalo calves before
colostrum feeding and six hours after colostrum feeding.
217
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Table 4. Profile of total immunoglobulin (mg/ml) in neonatal buffalo calves and cow calves in
relation to their mortality.
N e o n a ta l
T im e in te r v a ls T o ta l I m m u n o g lo b u lin s
c a lv e s
Bc 5 .8 ± 0 .6
P re -c o lo s tra l fee d in g
Cc 4 .1 ± 1 .0
Bc 122±30*
6 h rs p o st-c o lo s tra l fe ed in g
Cc 153±34
Bc 6 5 ± 9 .3
1 st D ay P o s tn ata l
Cc 96±25
Bc 91±13
2 n d D ay P o s tn ata l
Cc 95±19
Bc 98±18
3 rd D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 103±21
Bc 119±13
4 th D ay P o stn a tal
Cc 104±19
Bc 123±22
5 th D ay P o stn a tal
Cc 134±29
Bc 103±27
6 th D ay P o stn a tal
Cc 113±11
Bc 101±22
1 4 th D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 110±21
Bc 109±10
2 1 st D ay P o stn a tal
Cc 115±26
Bc 125±12
2 8 th D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 104±11
Bc 129±15
3 5 th D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 140±35
Bc 90±24*
4 2 n d D ay P o stn a tal
Cc 148±60
Bc 184±32
4 9 th D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 142±32
Bc 104±26
5 6 th D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 139±16
Bc 123±22
6 3 rd D ay P o s tn ata l
Cc 114±20
Bc 95±13*
7 0 th D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 174±32
Bc 126±10
7 7 th D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 115±26
Bc 115±15
8 4 th D ay P o stn a ta l
Cc 104±12
Bc 107±25
9 1 st D ay P o stn a tal
Cc 115±25
218
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
219
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
S.P. Shukla, S.P. Nema, S.S. Mahor, K.P. Gupta and U.K. Garg
ABSTRACT that the buffalo was alert and was straining. There
was complete letdown of milk and the pelvic
In the present study, dystocia due to fetal ligaments were relaxed. The vulva was slightly
arthrogryposis in a she buffalo was recorded. In the edematous. Per vaginal examination revealed
present case of fetal arthrogryposis delivery of a complete relaxation of the cervix. The birth canal
calf with manual correction and forced traction was was dry due lack of fetal fluids. The fetus was in
achieved successfully without any post-operative anterior longitudinal presentation, dorso-sacral
complication to the dam. position, right lateral deviation of head and neck and
flexion of fore limbs from knee joint. The fetus was
Keywords: dystocia, arthrogryposis, buffalo diagnosed dead.
Department of Animal Reproduction, Gynaecology & Obstetrics, College of Veterinary Science and Animal
Husbandry, J.N.K.V.V. Campus Mhow (M.P.) -453446 India
220
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
The neck and spinal cord was contracted (Figure buffaloes (Shukla et al., 2006 and Mahajan et al.,
2). The lumbar vertebrae were underdeveloped. A 2006). Arthrogryposis is one of the musculo-skeletal
near scapula bony mass was observed. deformities frequently encountered congenital
On postmortem examination, the trachea disease (Leipold et al., 1996) in farm animals and
was found to be diverted, the thoracic cavity was pets. In this condition, there is permanent joint
not fully developed, the heart was enlarged contractures. Its associated effects include
(cardiomegaly), the lungs were underdeveloped, and pelatoschimiasis and kyphoscoliasis (Morrow, 1986).
diaphragm was not fully developed. In the present case of fetal arthrogryposis,
Congenital anomalies causing obstetrical delivery of the calf with manual correction and
problems have been well documented in cattle (Sloss forced traction was achieved successfully without
and Dyfty, 1980, Shukla and Chauhan, 2004) and in any post operative complication to the dam.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
*Continued on page 230
221
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
The present study was carried out to The buffalo is famous for production of high
characterize beta-casein cDNA of Indian riverine milk fat and protein and high total solid content in
buffalo. This gene was cloned in plasmid vector and milk. Besides, it is well known that buffaloes have a
sequenced for molecular characterization of the unique feed conversion efficiency using low grade
cDNA. The whole buffalo beta-casein cDNA was roughages and are able to thrive under harsh climatic
675 bp in length. We have submitted the buffalo conditions with resistance to many diseases. Despite
cDNA sequences to the NCBI GenBank with the its huge potential and superiority to cows in many
accession number DQ631829. This gene was aspects, the buffalo has remained generally
composed of 23.85% A, 20.59% G, 24.89% T and neglected. In ruminants, caseins are the major milk
30.67% C indicating 48.74% as AT and 51.26% as proteins, which constitute 80% of the total protein
GC. The similarity of the buffalo cDNA sequence in milk (Dalgleish, 1993). There are four types of
with that of cattle was estimated as 98.08% while caseins, namely alpha s1-, alpha s2-, beta- and
with the sequences of other species like sheep, pig, kappa-casein present in milk of which beta-casein
camel, human, rat and rabbit, it was 96.60%. As far constitutes about 36% of total casein (Davies and
as protein sequence is concerned, the similarity of Law, 1980).
buffalo sequence with its cattle counter part was Beta-casein protein is a calcium sensitive
estimated as 97.30% and with the sequences of all protein and is insoluble in milk, and its concentration
other species studied here, it was calculated as is 9.3 gm/litre (Eigel et al., 1984). Beta-casein
93.30%. The molecular weight of buffalo beta- increases the firmness of curd from enzymically
casein protein was estimated as 25.105 kDa. The coagulated milk (Jimenez-Flores and Richardson,
secondary structure composition of buffalo beta- 1988). Mariani (1983) reported that the beta-casein
casein protein was prediced as having 14.3% helix B variant was superior to A variant in cheese making.
(H), 1.3% strand (E) and 83.9% loop (L) whereas Beta-casein helps in the absorption of minerals like
solvent accessibility composition was 79.02 % of Fe and Zn in the intestinal tract, besides, Fe
“e” type (residues exposed with more than 16% of complexed to beta-casein displayed a better
their surface) and 20.98 % of “b” type (others). bioavailability than gluconate Fe (Bouhallab et al.,
2002). It has been found that the binding of Zn to
Keywords: buffalo, beta-casein, homology, beta-casein improved Zn absorption and prevented
nucleotide, sequence Fe from inhibiting its absorption (Peres et al., 1998).
Various studies have been found with
respect to correlation between beta-casein variants
and type I diabetes. (A1 and B) variants of beta-
casein have correlation (r = +0.982) with type I insulin
1
Project Directorate on Poultry, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500030, India
e-mail: bhattacharyatk@gmail.com
2
Animal Genetics Division, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, UP - 243122, India
222
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
223
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
224
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Bovine cDNA sequence of beta-casein gene was and 54 neutral amino acids. In cattle, 16 strongly
first reported by Stewart et al. (1987). The Davis, basic, 23 strongly acidic, 78 hydrophobic, 56 polar
Botstein, Roth melting temperature of this gene in and 51 neutral amino acids were found, which was
buffalo was calculated as 85.18; which was found quite different from its buffalo counterpart. The
to be slightly higher than that of cattle, where it was sheep, pig, camel, human, rat and rabbit proteins were
85.050C. In other species like sheep, pig, camel, composed of 16 strongly basic, 23 strongly acidic,
human, rat and rabbit, the temperatures were found 78 hydrophobic, 54 polar and 51 neutral amino acids.
as 85.10C. The differences of polar and neutral amino acids
between the buffalo and other species suggest that
Sequence homology this protein in several species will have its own unique
Our buffalo sequence was subjected to structure for conferring differential biological
BLAST analysis at the NCBI website to retrieve activities. The primary protein sequence in cattle
similar sequences of mammalian origin. The multiple was elucidated by Ridadeau-Dumas et al. (1972)
alignment study revealed that the similarity of buffalo and Grosclaude et al. (1972). However, the
cDNA sequence with that of cattle was estimated differences of amino acids between buffalo and
as 98.08% while with other sequences like sheep, cattle were determined at 4th (H/R), 56th (M/T), 83rd
pig, camel, human, rat and rabbit, it was 96.60%. (K/N), 107th (I/V), 121st (H/Q) and 163 rd (P/H)
When protein sequence was considered, the locations (Figure 2). The variability of amino acids
similarity of buffalo sequence with its cattle counter between buffalo and cattle were observed from
part was estimated as 97.30%. The similarity of neutral to strongly basic at 40th, neutral to polar at
buffalo protein with that of all other species studied 56th, strongly basic to polar at 83rd and neutral to
here was calculated as 93.30%. When comparing polar at 121st position of the polypeptide. The amino
sequence of sheep with that of other species like acid changes between buffalo and other species like
pig, camel, human, rat and rabbit, all the species were sheep, pig, camel, human, rat and rabbit were
found to be 100% similar at both nucleotide and detected at 18th(L/Q), 24th(P/V), 27th(I/T), 56th(M/
amino acid level. T), 70 th (T/A), 78 th(P/T), 83 rd(K/N), 90 th (P/L),
111 th(S/P), 116th (A/T), 118th(A/V), 147 th(N/K),
Sequence variability 155th(L/V) and 183rd(S/P) position of the polypeptide
A number of changes of nucleotides were chain. While comparing the amino acid profiles
observed between buffalo and other species, and among sheep, pig, camel, human, rat and rabbit, there
they have been depicted in Figure 1. When were no differences found in the protein. But, due
comparing the buffalo sequence with that of cattle, to deletion of a block of nucleotides from the position
nucleotide changes were detected at several 584-589th of buffalo sequence, the amino acids
locations of which some changes at position 119th, proline and tyrosine were lacking from the position
168th, 249th, 319th, 363rd and 488th showed functional 195th and 196th of polypeptide chain of sheep, pig,
changes while others remained as silent in nature. camel, human, rat and rabbit beta-casein protein.
The sequence alignment study revealed that a block
of six nucleotides, viz ATC CCC was deleted from Protein parameters
position 584-589th of buffalo cDNA compared to The isoelectric point of buffalo and all other
other species, such as sheep, pig, camel, human, rat species except cattle were observed as 5.264 while
and rabbit. its magnitude in cattle was 5.118. The charge of
The molecular weight of buffalo beta-casein this protein in buffalo was -6.256 at pH 7.0 while in
protein was estimated as 25.105 kDa whereas cattle cattle it was found as -6.421 at neutral pH. In sheep,
protein was 25.097 kDa. In other species, it was pig, camel, human, rat and rabbit, the charge of this
quite a bit less: approximately 24.874 kDa. Both protein was observed as -6.255 at pH 7.0. Predicted
buffalo and cattle proteins were composed of 224 secondary structure composition of buffalo beta-
amino acids whereas sheep, pig, camel, human, rat casein protein showed 14.3% helix (H), 1.3% strand
and rabbit protein was constituted of 222 amino (E) and 83.9% loop (L). Predicted solvent
acids. In the buffalo protein, we found 16 strongly accessibility composition of buffalo beta-casein
basic, 23 strongly acidic, 78 hydrophobic, 53 polar protein showed 79.02% of “e” type (residues
225
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
226
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
gene and its distribution among European goat beta casein gene. Animal Genetics, 27:
cattle breeds. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 119: 123-124.
65-68. Peres, J.M., S. Bouhallab, C. Petit, F. Bureau, J.L.
Jimenez-Flores, R. and T. Richardson. 1988. Genetic Maubois, P. Arhaw and D. Bougle. 1998.
engineering of the caseins to modify the Improvement of Zn intestinal absorption and
behaviour of milk during processing: a review. reduction of zinc/iron interaction using metal
J. Dairy Sci., 71: 2646-2654. bound to the caseinophosphopeptide 1-25 of
Kim, S., K.F. Ng-Kwai-Hang and J.F. Hayes. 1996. beta-casein. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 38: 465-472.
The relationship between milk protein Pinder, S.J., B.N. Perry, C.J. Skidmore and D. Sarua.
phenotypes and lactation traits in Ayrshires and 1991. Analysis of polymorphism in the bovine
Jerseys. J. Anim. Sci., 79: 685-693. casein genes by use of PCR. Anim. Genet.,
Langley-Danysz. 1993. Goat milk : a profusion of 22: 11-20.
caseins. Revue Laitiere Franchise, 531: 24- Ribadeau-Dumas, B., G. Brignon, F. Grosclaude and
25. J.C. Mercier. 1972. Structure primaire de la
Lien, S., P. Alestrom, H. Klungland and S. Rogne. caseine b bovine sequence complete. Eur. J.
1992. Detection of multiple b-casein (CASB) Biochem., 25: 505-514.
alleles by amplification created restriction sites Rost, B. and C. Sander. 1993. Prediction of protein
(ACRS). Anim. Genet., 23: 333-338. secondary structure at better than 70 percent
Mahe, M.F. and F. Grosclaude. 1993. Polymorphism accuracy. J. Mol. Biol., 232: 584-599.
of beta casein in creole goat of guadeloupe: Rost, B., P. Fariselli and R. Casadio. 1996. Topology
evidence for a null allele. Genet. Sel. Evol., prediction for helical transmembrane proteins
25: 403-408. at 86 percent accuracy. Protein Sci., 5: 1704-
Mariani, P. 1983. Genetics and quality of milk used 1718.
in cheesemaking. Obiettivi-e-Documenti- Sambrook, J. and D.W. Russell. 2001. Molecular
Veterinari, 9: 25-30. cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed. Cold
McLean, D.M., E.R.B. Graham, R.W. Ponzoni and Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York,
H.A. McKenzie. 1984. Effects of milk protein USA.
genetic variants on milk yield and composition. Serrano, M.B., A.I. Garzon-Sigler, G. Garro, L.
J. Dairy Res., 51: 531-546. Chianese, J. Martinez-Henz, B.S. Moyano,
Moretini, L., M.G. Cavallo, S. Manfrini, L. Stefanini, A.I.G. Sigler and J.M. Hens. 1999. Casein
A. Picarelli, M. Ditola, A. Petrone, M. Bianchi, genetic variants in merino sheep breed.
M. La Presa, G. Di Giulio, M.G. Baroni, R. Archivos-de-Zootecnia, 48: 197-206.
Thorpe, B.K. Walker and P. Pozzilli. 2002. Stewart, A.F., J. Bonsing, C.W. Beattie, F. Shah,
Antibodies to bovine beta-casein in diabetes I.M. Willis and A.G. MacKinlay. 1987.
and other antiimmune diseases. Horm. Complete nucleotide sequences of bovine
Metab. Res., 34: 455-459. αs1-, αs2- and β-casein cDNAs: Com-
Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F., J.F. Hayes, J.E. Moxley and parisons with related sequences in other
H.G. Monardes. 1986. Relationships between species. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4: 231-241.
milk protein polymorphisms and major milk
constituents in Holstein-Friesian cows. J.
Dairy Sci., 69: 22-26.
Pappalardo, M., A. Rando, P. Gregorio, P. Masina
and L. Rmunno. 1997. A Mse I RFLP in the
5' DNA region of the goat b-casein gene.
Anim. Genet., 28: 242.
Papparardo, M., A. Rando, G. Cosenza, M. Capuano
and L. Ramuno. 1996. A Bal I RFLP at the
227
A T G A A G G T C C T C A T C C T T G C C T G T C T G G T G G C T C T G G C C C T T G C A A G A G A G C A G G A A G A A C T C A A T G T A G T C G G T G A G A C T G T G G A A A G C C T T T C A A G C A Majority
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C C . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . buffalo.SEQ
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . camel.SEQ
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C C T . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cattle.SEQ
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.SEQ
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.SEQ
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.SEQ
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.SEQ
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.SEQ
G T G A G G A A T C T A T T A C A C A C A T C A A T A A G A A A A T T G A G A A G T T T C A A A G T G A G G A A C A A C A G C A A A C A G A G G A T G A A C T C C A G G A T A A A A T C C A C C C C T T Majority
110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . T G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . buffalo.SEQ
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . camel.SEQ
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cattle.SEQ
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.SEQ
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.SEQ
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.SEQ
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.SEQ
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.SEQ
T G C C C A G G C A C A G T C T C T A G T C T A T C C C T T C A C T G G G C C C A T C C C T A A C A G C C T C C C A C A A A A C A T C C T G C C T C T T A C T C A A A C C C C T G T G G T G G T G C C G Majority
210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300
201 . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . buffalo.SEQ
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . camel.SEQ
201 . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cattle.SEQ
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.SEQ
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.SEQ
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.SEQ
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.SEQ
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.SEQ
C C T T T C C T T C A G C C T G A A A T A A T G G G A G T C C C C A A A G T G A A G G A G A C T A T G G T T C C T A A G C A C A A G G A A A T G C C C T T C C C T A A A T A T C C A G T T G A G C C C T Majority
310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400
301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . buffalo.SEQ
301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . camel.SEQ
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . A . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cattle.SEQ
301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.SEQ
301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.SEQ
301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.SEQ
301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.SEQ
228
301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.SEQ
T T A C T G A A A G C C A G A G C C T G A C T C T C A C T G A T G T T G A A A A G C T G C A C C T T C C T C T G C C T C T G G T C C A G T C T T G G A T G C A C C A G C C T C C C C A G C C T C T T C C Majority
410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500
401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . buffalo.SEQ
401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . camel.SEQ
401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . cattle.SEQ
401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.SEQ
401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.SEQ
401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.SEQ
401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.SEQ
401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.SEQ
T C C A A C C G T C A T G T T T C C T C C T C A G T C C G T G C T G T C C C T T T C T C A G C C C A A A G T T C T G C C T G T T C C C C A G A A A G C A G T G C C C C A G A G A G A T A T G C C C A T C Majority
510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600
501 . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . T C C C C . G . G A G A T . . G buffalo.SEQ
501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . camel.SEQ
501 . . . . . . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . T C C C C . G . G A G A T . . G cattle.SEQ
501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.SEQ
501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.SEQ
501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.SEQ
501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.SEQ
501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.SEQ
C A G G C C T T T C T G C T G T A C C A G G A G C C T G T A C T T G G T C C T G T C C G G G G A C C C T T C C C T A T T C T T G T C T A A X X X X X X Majority
Decoration 'Decoration #1': Hide (as '.') residues that match the Consensus exactly.
Figure 1. Nucleotide sequence based multiple alignment profile of beta-casein gene among various species.
M K V L I L A C L V A L A L A R E Q E E L N V V G E T V E S L S S S E E S I T H I N K K I E K F Q S E E Q Q Q T E D E L Q D K I H P F A Q A Q S L V Y P F T G P I P N S L P Q N I L P L T Q T P V V V P Majority
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L . . . . . P . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . P . . . . K . . . . . . P . . . . . . . . . . buffalo.PRO
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Camel.PRO
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L . . . . . P . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . . . . . P . . . . . . . . . . . P . . . . . . . . . . cattle.PRO
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.PRO
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.PRO
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.PRO
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.PRO
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.PRO
P F L Q P E I M G V P K V K E T M V P K H K E M P F P K Y P V E P F T E S Q S L T L T D V E K L H L P L P L V Q S W M H Q P P Q P L P P T V M F P P Q S V L S L S Q P K V L P V P Q K A V P Q R D M P I Majority
110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
101 . . . . . . . . . . S . . . . A . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N . . . . . . . L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S . . . . . . . . . . . Y P Q R D M buffalo.PRO
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Camel.PRO
101 . . . . . . V . . . S . . . . A . A . . Q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N . . . . . . . L . . . . . . . H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S . . . . . . . . . . . Y P Q R D M cattle.PRO
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.PRO
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.PRO
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.PRO
229
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.PRO
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.PRO
Q A F L L Y Q E P V L G P V R G P F P I L V - - - Majority
210 220
201 P I Q A F L L Y Q E P V L G P V R G . F P I I V . buffalo.PRO
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Camel.PRO
201 P I Q A F L L Y Q E P V L G P V R G . F P I I V . cattle.PRO
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . human.PRO
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pig.PRO
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rabbit.PRO
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rat.PRO
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sheep.PRO
Decoration 'Decoration #1': Hide (as '.') residues that match the Consensus exactly.
Figure 2. Protein sequence based multiple alignment analysis of beta-casein among various mammalian species.
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Buffalo Bulletin (Sebtember 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Buffalo
Cattle
Sheep
Rabbit
Camel
Pig
Rat
79.6
Human
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Nucleotide Substitutions (x100)
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the nucleotide sequence of beta-casein gene.
Buffalo
Cattle
Sheep
Rabbit
Camel
Pig
Rat
155.4
Human
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the amino acid sequence of beta-casein gene.
230
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
College of Veterinary science & A.H., N.D. university of Ag. & Tech, Kumarganj, Faizabad, India
231
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
232
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
Records on 1753 buffaloes belonging to The importance of Murrah among the Indian
three genetic groups i.e. Murrah, graded Murrah breeds is clearly evident from the fact that this breed
and Nili Ravi from six military dairy farms of north has been used an improver breed for upgrading low
India were used for the study. Variables considered milk producing breeds throughout the country as well
for construction of restricted selection index were as other countries of Asia. It is the only breed
AFC (age at first calving in months), WFC (weight maintained in large numbers at organized and military
at first calving in kg), FLP (first lactation period in dairy farms. Thus selection is the only tool available
days), FCI (first calving interval in days), FLMY for bringing about genetic improvement in this breed.
(first lactation milk yield in kg), AFLMY (average Profitability from dairy animals is a combination of
milk yield per day of first calving interval in kg), many traits, viz., bodyweight, age at first calving,
PFL (profit in first lactation in Rs.) and APFL calving intervals, breeding efficiency, milk
(average profit per day of first calving interval in production, number of calves produced etc. But
Rs.). Restriction was done in two different indices: multi-trait selection may lead to increased cost of
one for AFC and WFC and other for AFC, WFC production by delayed maturity and return of income.
and FCI. In all, two restricted selection indices were Therefore, restrictions can be imposed on AFC,
constructed. Maximum genetic improvement in WFC and FCI so that the return in terms of milk
FLMY (9.866 kg) was very much less than the index starts earlier. Chakravarty et al. (1988), while
incorporating all the eight traits. Based on expected studying the complete restricted index selection for
genetic economic gain it was concluded that the the genetic improvement of Indian buffaloes, reported
selection index for buffaloes could be -117.64 AFC that restriction on age at first calving and first service
+3.21 WFC +26.60 FLP +118.50 FCI - 4.88 FLMY period was most efficient for improving first lactation
-26180.0 AFLMY +0.066 PFL +31782.0 APFL milk yield. Ghajbhiya and Tripathi (1991) reported
instead of the restricted index of 1.799AFC +0.219 that in 412 Murrah buffaloes maintained at NDRI,
WFC +0.043 FLP -2.155 FCI +0.77FLMY +137.51 Karnal, the greatest reduction occurred in aggregate
AFLMY +0.012 PFL -269.27 APFL. genetic gain when restriction was imposed on highly
heritable and economically important traits, such as
Keywords: profit, restriction, selection, index, age at first calving. They recommended a restricted
economic gain, intensity selection index combining age at first calving, first
lactation length, first dry period, first service period,
and milk yield per day of first calving interval to
keep first lactation length constant.
1
Department of Animal Sciences, Hill Campus, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology
P.O. Ranichauri - 249 199, Distt. Tehri Garhwal, Uttaranchal, India
2
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Raja Balwant Singh College, Bichpuri, Agra,283105,U.P.
India
3
Animal Breeding, Deptt. of A. R. Sc., A.C.A., Hawassa University, PO box no. 05, Awassa, Ethiopia.
e-mail: dr_rbprasadbm@yahoo.com
233
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Therefore, efforts were made a put complete Gij = genetic value of the ith trait,
restriction on AFC and WFC in an index and AFC, σ T = standard deviation of the index =
WFC and FCI in a second index with the idea that √(b/ P b)
these three traits are economically highly important i = intensity of selection (0.497 if 70% of
for estimation of profit for buffaloes. buffaloes to be retained for further breeding in each
generation,
σ T I = covariance between index and
MATERIALS AND METHODS aggregate genotypic value,
σ I = standard deviation of aggregate
Records on 1,753 buffaloes belonging to genotypic value = √(b/ G b)
three genetic groups i.e. Murrah, Graded Murrah
and Nili Ravi from six military dairy farms located
in north India were used for the study. All the animals RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
were maintained under standered managemental
conditions. Variables considered for each buffalo Least square means of the traits used for
were first lactation traits like AFC (age at first the selection index in the herd are given in Table 1.
calving in months), WFC (weight at first calving in A total of two restricted selection indices were
kg), FLP (first lactation period in days), FCI (first constructed using complete restriction on AFC and
calving interval in days), FLMY (first lactation milk WFC in the first and AFC, WFC and FCI in the
yield in kg), AFLMY (average milk yield per day of second index. Selection indices along with index
first calving interval in kg), PFL (profit in first coefficients (b i) and expected genetic gain in
lactation in Rs) and APFL (average profit per day individual trait in buffaloes are presented in Table 2.
of first calving interval in Rs) . The results of Table 2 indicated that the expected
In order to obtain adequate data sets for genetic gain for the traits under restriction were very
statistical analysis, records used in the study were small ranging from -0.138x10-6 to -0.423x 10-6 in
edited as follows: buffalo producing milk for more the first index and -0.183x10-4 to -0.712 x 10-5 in
than 150 days and drying under normal physiological the second index. But the genetic gain in first
condition were included. Abortions and other lactation milk yield (9.866 kg) greatly reduced as
pathological causes which affected the first lactation compared to the standard selection index
data were not included in the study. incorporating all these characters (433.67 kg in I23).
The profit characters (PFL and APFL) were The first restricted selection index was better than
calculated as per Sunil Kumar et al., 2006 the second (rTI 0.151 vs 0.088).
The restricted selection index introduced by The expected aggregate genetic gain was
Kempthorne and Nordskog (1959) was used to more (Rs. 89.76) by the first restricted selection
construct the index. index than by the second index (Rs. 51.57). The
In order to find the most suitable and efficient accuracy of selection (rTI = 0.151) and heritability
selection index, the following criteria were used: were also for use in the first index. The present
The change in aggregate genetic economic gain: findings did not agree with the results of Chakravarty
ΔH = ΣA Δ Pi et al. (1988) who suggested that restriction of age
Accuracy of selection and first service period is most efficient for
r TI = σ T I/(σ T σ I) improvement in FLMY. Whereas they were in
Heritability estimate of index: agreement with the results of Gajbhiya and Tripathi
h2I = s2 g/ s2 P = [(b/ G b)/ (b/ P b)] (1991) who reported that there was the greatest
where Δ Pi = expected genetic gain in ith trait due reduction in aggregate genetic gain if there is
to unit change in index in standard deviation form restriction on highly heritable and economically
= (Σbi Gij / σ I) i, important traits like age at first calving and weight
A = relative economic value of the ith trait at first calving for improving FLMY or aggregate
included in the index, which was taken as 1.00, genetic gain per generation.
bi = column vector of coefficient of index,
234
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Table 1. Least squares mean and standard error of the traits under study.
S. Standard
Traits Mean
no. error
1 Age at first calving (months) 41.12 0.35
2 Weight at first calving (kg) 483.588 2.962
3 First lactation period (days) 302.75 2.66
4 First calving interval (day) 471.99 5.74
5 First lactation milk yield (kg) 1818.41 21.26
6 Average milk yield per day of first calving interval (kg) 3.95 0.07
7 Profit in first lactation (Rs.) 1992.02 370.79
8 Average profit per day of first calving interval (Rs.) 5.43 0.08
Table 2. Restricted selection index coefficients along with accuracy, heritability and expected
genetic gain in aggregate genotype.
I1 I2
(restriction on (restriction on
AFC & WFC) AFC,WFC & FCI)
Accuracy of selection 0.151 0.088
Heritability 0.036 0.013
Expected aggregate genetic gain (Rs.) 89.760 51.57
Index coefficients (b)
AFC 1.799 4.400
WFC 0.219 0.687
FLP 0.043 0.261
FCI -2.155 -2.187
FLMY 0.770 0.537
AFLMY 137.510 4.214
PFL 0.012 0.001
APFL -269.270 -182.583
Dummy(AFC constant) -44.504 362.698
Dummy(WFC constant) 2.988 -40.475
Dummy(FCI constant) - -78.798
Expected genetic gain on the trait
AFC -0.138x10-6 -0.283x10-5
WFC -0.423x10-6 -0.712x10-5
FLP -0.348 -0.049
FCI -1.516 -0.183x10-4
FLMY 9.866 1.479
AFLMY 0.026 -0.131x10-3
PFL 169.523 102.342
APFL 0.037 -0.004
235
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Department of Physiology, NTR College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University,
Gannavaram-521 102, Andhra Pradesh, India
236
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
(MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) and thousands/mm3 in 2-3-year old buffaloes to 2.51 ±
mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration 0.28 thousands/mm3 in over 10-year-old buffaloes.
(MCHC) were estimated (Feldman et al., 2000). This may be an age related phenomenon.
All estimated values were expressed as mean ± S.E. The packed cell volume (PCV) obtained in
and arranged and grouped according to age of the present study (27 ± 0.55%) is comparable with
animal. The data pertaining to all age groups were the value of Murrah buffaloes (30.58 ± 0.25%; Patil
subjected to one-way analysis of ANOVA and et al., 1992a). A higher PCV was reported in native
comparisons of mean values between different age Iranian buffaloes (35.65 ± 6.19%; Khadjeh and
groups were made using Tukey’s multiple range test. Papahn, 2002). The probable reason for the lower
P<0.05 was the value considered significant values of PCV observed may be due to the Wintrobe
(Snedecor and Cochran, 1994). method used in the present study and other factors
like breed, weather, and feeding practices (Jain,
1993).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A haemoglobin concentration of 9.45 ± 0.22
g/dl was observed in the graded Murrah buffaloes.
Haematological parameters estimated in 77 A similar haemoglobin concentration was
female buffaloes were arranged in different groups documented in Indian buffaloes (10.3 ± 0.2g/dl;
according to the age of the animals and presented Murthy, 1980). However, higher haemoglobin
in Table 1. The overall means of all the parameters concentration of 11.81 ± 0.15g/dl was reported in
is also presented in Table 2. The overall mean total Murrah buffaloes (Patil et al., 1992a). The lower
erythrocyte count (TEC) obtained in the present haemoglobin values may be due to poor nutrition
study was 4.70 ± 0.11 millions/mm3, which was and lower TEC. The haemoglobin concentration was
comparatively lower than the reported values in highest in the 4-5 year age group (10.17 ± 0.76 g/
Murrah buffaloes (6.77 ± 0.08 millions/mm3; Patil dl). There was a decrease in the concentration of
et al., 1992a) and in Iranian native female buffaloes haemoglobin values in buffaloes above 5 years of
(7.37 ± 1.86 millions/mm3; Khadjeh and Papahn, age. This may be due to the reduction of red bone
2002). The reason for the lower TEC may be due marrow and decreased erythropoiesis (Sharma et
to an increased size of the erythrocytes of buffaloes al., 1985; Jain, 1993; Feldman et al., 2000; Khadjeh
in this region, as mean corpuscular volume (MCV, and Papahn, 2002).
58.44 ± 1.16 fl) was higher compared to the values The overall mean of MCH was 20.52 ± 0.48
of MCV reported in Murrah buffaloes (45.63 ± 0.50 pg. This was higher than that reported in buffaloes
fl; Patil et al., 1992a). Total erythrocyte count of 2- (18.07 ± 0.13 pg) by Murthy (1980). This indicates
3-year-old buffaloes was significantly higher there was an increase in average weight of
compared to other age group buffaloes except the haemoglobin. The pattern of MCH variation with
6-7-year-old buffaloes. A significant decrease in age conforms to the report of Khadjeh and Papahn,
TEC with increase in age was due to decrease in (2002).
erythropoiesis and build up of sex hormones (Sharma The mean value of MCHC (35.36 ± 0.64%)
et al., 1985; Jain, 1993; Feldman et al., 2000; obtained was in the normal range of values reported
Khadjeh and Papahn, 2002). in clinically normal Indian Murrah buffaloes
Overall mean of total leukocyte count (Feldman et al., 2000). The value of MCHC has a
(TLC) obtained in the present study was low (3.15 reverse relationship with PCV. The present study
± 0.18 thousands/mm3) when compared to the value was an attempt to generate basal data on
reported in Murrah buffaloes (7.96 ± 0.29 thousands/ haematological parameters to fill the knowledge gap,
mm3; Patil et al., 1992b). However, there is a decline as normal blood values of the graded Murrah
in leukocyte count with age from 4.54 ± 0.57 buffaloes had not yet been reported and the values
recorded may be of use like ready reckoning material
in clinical situations.
237
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Table 1. Overall means of haematology of graded Murrah buffaloes in the coastal region of Andhra
Pradesh (India).
Table 2. Haematological parameters based on age of graded Murrah buffaloes in the present study.
238
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Patil, M.D., B.A. Talvelkar, V.G. Joshi and B.T. buffaloes during summer. Indian J. Dairy
Deshmukh. 1992b. Haematalogical studies in Sci., 33(3): 294-298. (Cited by Sastry, N.S.R.
Murrah buffaloes: TLC, DLC and micrometry and C.K.Thomas. 1973.)
of leucocytes. Indian Vet. J., 69: 760-761. Sharma, M.C., N.N. Pathak, R.P. Verma, N.N.
Ranawana, S.S.E., A.A.J. Rajaratna, Kumari Hung, N.V. Cu, N.H. Lien, D.T. An, H.V. Mai
Gunaratna and E.M.C. Ekanayaka. 1989. and N.V. Vuc. 1985. Normal Haematology
Blood values of the indigenous Sri Lanka of Murrah buffaloes of various ages in the
buffalo, p. 231-233. Seminar on Buffalo agro climatic condition in Viet Nam. Indian
Genotypes for Small Farms in Asia, Serdang. Vet. J., 62: 383-386.
Bahga, G.S., P.C. Gangwar, R.K. Srivastava and Snedecor, G.W. and W.B.Cochran. 1994. Stastical
D.P. Dhingra. 1980. Effect of spray cooling Methods, 8th ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing
and wallowing on blood composition in Co., Calcutta, India.
239
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
Caseins constitute about 80% of the total Livestock is a major financial factor in the
milk proteins that exist in different molecular forms economy of Pakistan accounting for 49.1% of
(αS1, αS2, β and κ). Kappa-casein (κ-CN), the most agriculture added and about 11.4% of GDP.
important among these casein proteins, presents Pakistan, the fifth largest milk producing country of
polymorphism due to nucleotide sequence variation. the world, has an annual gross milk production of
κ-CN exists commonly as A and B variants that are about 27.8 million tons mainly from buffalo and cattle
important to the quality of milk. contributing 71 and 24% respectively of the total
The present study was conducted to milk production. In a recent year, Pakistan possessed
investigate the existence of polymorphism at κ-CN 27.335 million head of buffaloes (GOP, 2006-07). In
locus. A PCR-RFLP method was used to distinguish this context the most important dairy breeds are Nili-
buffalo κ-CN alleles. This method can be used for Ravi buffalo and Sahiwal cattle, undoubtedly being
genotyping of animals of either sex and at an early the most adaptable and versatile of all the
age. The genotypes were confirmed by checking domesticated animals in Asia. But accurate selection
specific, clearly distinguishable DNA band patterns still has extreme importance to bringing stable
resulting from digestion with the three selected improvement in milk quantity and quality.
restriction enzymes (Hinf I, Hae III and Mae II). The Nili-Ravi buffalo is the main dairy breed
Analysis of 163 animals revealed that all buffaloes of Pakistan. These animals are important assets of
were monomorphic showing only the BB genotype. the country for the adaptive traits they have
κ-CN B allele which has a significant effect on milk developed over time, such as tolerance to large
quality reported previously should be included in fluctuations in the availability of fodder, quality of
breeding strategies for dairy animals. feed resources and adaptation to low input
The current study is the first report of DNA production system and poor management conditions.
based genotyping of κ-CN gene of the indigenous In addition to providing milk they are also a source
buffalo breed of Pakistan. As the monomorphism of beef in Pakistan as the surplus male buffalo
for κ-CN locus is observed in buffalo population, calves are extensively used for beef. Therefore, the
this could lead to the development of a method to buffalo occupies a key position in the rural economy
identify mixtures of cow and buffalo milk in cheese of Pakistan.
processing. Selection on the basis of molecular markers
is more reliable than any other criterion. Adaptation
Keywords: κ-CN, milk protein polymorphism, PCR- of such a selection depends on the identification of
RFLP, genotype candidate genes by determining the co-relationship
between a physiological or biochemical process and
1
Health Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, (NIBGE),
Faisalabad, Pakistan. Email. dr_naeemr@yahoo.com
2
Livestock production and research Institute (LPRI), Okara. Pakistan
240
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
the trait. Polymorphism of such genes has great (Lin et al., 1992). In variant B, isoleucine substitutes
potential for use as a unique genetic marker. For threonine and aspartic acid is substituted by alanine
centuries, milk quality and quantity have always been (Pinder et al., 1991) these changes are due to a
taken as a trait of supreme interest. Its importance single base mutation in the κ-CN locus.
is clear from its wide use and composition especially In view, of the importance of milk quality in
the protein profile. Variation in composition and the economy of Pakistan and to study the genetic
production due to certain genetic features involving variability among buffalo breeds, the present study
many genes and environmental factors such as was designed with the aims of first to optimize a
climate, management and stage of lactation etc make standard molecular method at DNA level then to
it a multi factorial polygenic trait (Henderson, 1971). identify the occurrence of polymorphism at κ-CN
Milk protein polymorphism has received locus in the indigenous buffalo breed (Nili-Ravi).
intensive research interest due to its importance in
breed selection. Different genomic variation in the
κ-CN locus has been strongly associated with the MATERIALS AND METHODS
difference in milk composition, and the processing
properties of milk and dairy products. Such variation Animal blood sample collection and data
can be detected by restriction analysis through recording
electrophoresis. Some other variations, named One hundred and sixty three buffaloes from
posttranscriptional variations, are also seen in the of the Nili-Ravi breed were sampled during their
casein molecule (McLean, 1987, Kemes et al., first lactation, both from government and private
1999). Restricted expression of casein during farms maintained on standard balanced diet. Five
lactation limits the use of milk protein analysis for milliliters of blood was collected in K3-EDTA coated
genotypic evaluation but DNA based genotyping sterile vaccutainers, and the tubes were maintained
through PCR-RFLP has made this evaluation at -200C until used for DNA extraction.
possible as well as simpler for a large number of DNA Extraction
animals. Adopting such an evaluation method Genomic DNA was extracted from
broadens the selection process and its influence leukocytes according to the methodology described
regardless of sex, age or physiological stage of the by Sambrook et al., 1989. The quality and
animals. This also lead to have an improved response concentration of extracted DNA was assessed by
to selection (Medrano and Aguilar Cordova, 1990) visualizing it on 0.8% agarose gel under UV light.
in relatively short time. Polymerase Chain Reaction
Bovine casein is encoded by a 200 kb DNA The primers used for the amplification of
fragment located at chromosome no. 6 arranged in the κ-CN gene fragments were reported by Barroso
the order of αS1, αS2, β and κ. κ-CN fragment et al.,1998 with the following nucleotide sequence:
spans the 13 kb DNA sequence divided into five KF 5′-TGTGCTGAGTAGGTATCCTAGTTA
exons and intervening sequences and constitutes TGG-3′ KR 5′-GCGTTGTCTTCTTTGATGT
about 25% of the casein fraction (Lien and Rogne, CTCCT-3′ . The amplification reaction was done in
1993). a final volume of 25 μl, containing 100 ng DNA, 50
κ-CN has been extensively studied for its pico moles of each primer, 1X Taq polymerase buffer
role of stabilizing the casein micelles and its influence (10 mM Tris HCl pH 9.0, 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton
on the manufacturing properties of milk. For several X-100), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs and 0.5U
breeds the genetic variability in the κ-CN locus has Taq DNA polymerase. The amplification was carried
been reported, each with a different allelic frequency out in a thermal cycler with the following
based on genetic diversity among the breeds. Two amplification conditions: 940C for 5 minutes (initial
main variants of κ-CN have been identified in denaturation), 94 0C for 1 minutes, 650C for 1
different bovine breeds, that is, A and B, and the minutes, and 72 0C for 2 minutes with a final
Variant B is concerned with processing properties
of milk and has better lactodynographic properties
241
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Figure 1. Analysis of amplified product of κ-CN gene (Exon IV) on 1.8% agarose gel. Lane 1: 50 bp
DNA ladder (MBI, Fermentas). Lane 2: Negative control. Lane 3: Positive control. Lane 4-7:
amplified product of bovine κ-CN gene which resulted 453 bp bands.
242
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Figure 2. Restriction analysis of amplified product of -CN gene (Exon IV) with MaeII, HinfI and
HaeIII on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane 1: 50 bp DNA ladder (MBI, Fermentas). Lane
2-3 digested PCR product with MaeII, Lane 4-5 with HinfI, Lane 6-7: HaeIII restriction
endonucleases.
243
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Table 1. DNA fragment sizes for each genotype for κ-CN locus after digestion with Hinf I, Hae III and
Mae II.
Restriction Enzyme
Genotypes Hinf I Hae III Mae II
Sizes in Base pairs (bps)
AA* ----- 326 100 27 230 223 ----- ----- ----- 254 199
AB* 426 326 100 27 230 223 ----- ----- ----- 254 199
BB* 426 ----- ----- 27 230 223 ----- ----- ----- 254 199
* Genotypes found in our study (Reviewed in Barroso et al., 1998).
* Specific to our study.
244
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
1
Department of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Sciences & A.H., Jabalpur, M.P-482 001
India. e-mail: amishra5@yahoo.co.in
2
Dept. of LPM, College of Veterinary Sciences & A.H., Jabalpur, M.P-482 001 India
3
Dairy Cattle Physiology Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana India
245
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
246
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
absorbance at 450 nm by using Graphpad PRISM R had also calved recently. On the basis of progesterone
3.0, software package.The quality control of the profiles, six had commenced cyclicity during the
assay was carried out by performing the following: course of 3 months, while six animals had not
Assay sensitivity commenced cyclicity even up to 90 days post-
The lowest GH detection limit significantly partum.
different from zero concentration, was 40 pg/100 μl (2) Milk production performance
plasma/well, which corresponds to 0.4 ng/ml in On the basis of milk yield data obtain from
plasma and the 50 percent relative binding was seen the animals, the twelve were also divided into two
at 900 pg/100 μl/well. Intra- and inter-assay groups, viz., low yielders (n=6) and high yielders
coefficient of variations were determined using (n=6). The high yielders gave 9.0 to 13.0 litres milk/
pooled plasma containing 2.0 ng/ml were found to day whereas the low yielders produced between 5.0
be 3.68 and 6.89 percent, respectively, from eight to 8.5 litres milk/day. The overall milk yield + SEM
assays. The specificity of the antiserum used was for low yielders was 6.58+0.469 kg/day as against
determined by the method of Hennies and Holtz 10.92+0.608 kg/day for the high yielders, which was
(1993). The antiserum showed high specificity for significantly (P<0.01) different.
GH. (3) Endocrine parameters
Statistical analysis Plasma growth hormone in high and low
The data obtained were analyzed by using yielders
Microsoft Excel 2000 and a Graphpad PRISM R There was no significant (P>0.05)
software package, 1995. Paired t-test was employed difference between mean growth hormone
to test the difference between plasma GH amongst concentrations post-partum (n=6), which was 14.91
high yielders and low yielders. To test the metabolic + 2.315 ng/ml and 10.51 + 1.646 ng/ml for high and
and hormonal parameters, analysis of variance low yielders respectively.
technique was used in the following statistical model: While no reports are available for comparing
yijk = μ+ αI + βj + eijk where, our data on growth hormone in high and low yielding
yijk = the dependent variable buffaloes (or even cows), the magnitude of growth
μ = overall populations mean hormone levels were similar to those reported by
αI = the effect of ith treatment, Sartin et al. (1988), who recorded hormone levels
βj = the effect of jth week of experimental period of 19.3, 16.4 and 13.6 ng/ml at 1 to 20, 21 to 40 and
and 41 to 56 days lactation in cows, respectively. In
eijk = random error associated with kth individual, lactating Murrah buffaloes, the level of growth
normally and independently distributed with mean hormone was reported as 2.48 ng/ml (Jindal and
zero, and variance σ2. Ludri, 1990) but in contrast to this according to Patel
The correlations among these traits were (2001), this level is 14 to 20 ng/ml, and it decreases
calculated within each group, and the significance in advanced lactation. Normal concentration of
was tested using standard statistical methods as growth hormone in plasma of cattle ranges from 3
described by Snedecor and Cochran (1968). to 30 ng/ml depending upon age, sex and stage of
lactation (Schams et al., 1989).
The variation in growth hormone level in
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION different studies can also be attributed to the
different sources of purified growth hormone used
(1) Cyclicity commencement in different studies as well as the differences in
Commencement of cyclicity was deter- antisera specificities. No significant trend in growth
mined by progesterone analysis at regular 3-4 day hormone profile was recorded for either high and
intervals. Continuous monitoring of progesterone low yielders (Figure 2) over 90 days post-partum.
levels (from 5 days post-partum up to 3 months) Vasilatos and Wangsness (1981) reported in cattle
was carried out on 12 animals which incidentally that during early lactation (30 days post-partum) the
plasma growth hormone concentration was elevated
247
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
(13.2 ng/ml) compared to that in later lactation (90 cyclicity even up to 90 days ranged from 7.598 +
days post-partum), which was 9.8 ng/ml. However, 1.671 to 14.596 + 2.643 ng/ml (Figure 1). The plasma
they stated that the increased growth hormone status GH profiles in the two groups of animals were not
in early lactation was due to greater magnitude of significantly different (P>0.05). Further no significant
individual secretory spikes rather than a difference correlation was found between GH concentration
in frequency of spikes or baseline plasma levels of and days to commencement of cyclicity (Table 1).
GH. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports
GH and Commencement of Cyclicity either in cattle or in buffaloes which provide
The mean GH concentration in animals showing early information on the relationship of plasma GH to
commencement of cyclicity ranged from 11.874 + commencement of cyclicity.
2.532 to 14.479 + 3.517 ng/ml, whereas the GH
concentration in animals which has not exhibited
Table 1. Correlation coefficients (r) of different hormones and commencement of cyclicity in high and
low yielders.
High yielders
GH MILK YIELD
yielders
Low
GH 1.0000 0.1832*
Commencement of Cyclicity (days) 0.1781 -0.2370
*, Significant at 5% level
15
10
15 30 45 60 75 90
Postpartum days
248
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
249
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
250
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
rate of 5.0 ml subcutaneously (the bacterial vaccination (Figure 1). A similar trend was also
concentration adjusted to 40-80 x 109 colony forming observed by Das and Mulbagal (1983), Afzal et al.
units) as recommended by the producer of the (2000) and Jamal et al. (2003) who recorded a
vaccine. On the day of vaccination, a similar dose maximum antibody titre between the 10th and 15th
of normal saline was also administered to an equal day post vaccination and found the titre became zero
group of healthy buffalo calves which were or insignificant by the 90th day post vaccination.
maintained as a control group. Brucella abortus strain-19 vaccine has
Serum samples were collected on 0, 15th, remained the cornerstone of most brucellosis
30th, 60th, 90th and 120th day post- vaccination. eradication programmes since 1940. Calfhood
The Serum Tube Agglutination Test (STAT) vaccination with Strain-19 leads to progressive
and 2-Mercaptoethanol Test (2-MET) was reduction in cases of brucellosis across the globe
performed on the collected serum samples as per and protects animals up to the 5 th pregnancy
the method described by Alton et al. (1975b). (Manthei, 1952). In the present study, an attempt
was made to evaluate the immune response of strain-
19 vaccine in female buffalo calves.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The serum samples of vaccinated calves
treated with 2-Mercaptoethanol (0.1mol/litre) in
The prevalence rate of brucellosis in normal saline and assayed by STAT showed
unorganized herds of buffalo was 15.60% and in maximum 2-MET titre on the 15 th day post
organized herds was 8.16%. The serum samples vaccination. However, the antibody titre declined to
from vaccinated and control buffalo calves were
Figure 1. STAT and 2-MET titres in vaccinated animals at different post vaccination days.
subjected to STAT to evaluate the antibody below detectable level from the 90 th day post
response. Calves vaccinated with Strain-19 vaccine vaccination (Figure 1). The antibody titre of 2-MET
developed antibody, which reached peak titre presented in the study is in agreement with
(133.30+16.87) on the 15th day post vaccination and conclusions of Das and Mulbagal (1983). Afzal et
declined rapidly thereafter. The STAT titre remained al. (2000) also stated that specific immunoglobulin
positive up to the 30th day post vaccination. However, G titre as measured by 2-Mercaptoethanol treated
the antibody titre declined to below diagnostic level serum declined much earlier than STAT titre.
and persisted at a negligible level on 120th day post
251
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
252
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
1
Division of Veterinary Clinical Medicine & Jurisprudence, Faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal
Husbandry, Sher-E-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, R.S. Pura,
Jammu-181102 (J & K), India. E-mail:drneelesh_sharma@yahoo.co.in
2
Division of Veterinary Biochemistry. Faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Sher-E
Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, R.S. Pura, Jammu-181102
(J & K), India
253
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Table 1. Mean values of eggs per gram (EPG) and percentage reduction of eggs at different days before
and after treatment.
Days
Pre-treatment Post-treatment
Details
0 3 7 14
A (Control) 1284.28±61.44 1298.57±65.08 1370±63.55 1450±61.84
B (Treated) 1217.14 ±59.23 530.14±45.41* 70.00±10.52* 00
% Efficacy of drug 00 56.45 94.25 100
P<0.001
254
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
Patel, R.K., J.B. Chauhan, K.M. Singh and K.J. Indian buffalo breed using PCR-RFLP.
Soni. 2007. Genotypin and alleleic frequencies Buffalo J., 2: 195-202.
of κ-CN and β-LG in Indian River buffalo Sambrook, J., E.F. Fritsch and T. Maniatis. 1989.
Bulls. Buffalo Bull., 26(3): 63-66. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual,
Pinder, S.J., B.N. Perry, C.J. Skidmore and D. Savva. 2nd ed. Vol.3, Cold Spring, Harbour Laboratory
1991. Analysis of polymorphism in the bovine Press, New York.
casein gene by use of polymerase chain Singh, S., K. Pushpendra and T.K. Bhattacharya.
reaction. Anim. Gene., 22: 11-22. 2005. DNA polymorphism of κ-CN and β-CN
Pipalia, D.L., D.D. Ladani, B.P. Brahmkshtri, D.N. genes and its association with milk production
Rank, C.G. Joshi. P.H. Vataliya and J.V. and quality traits in buffalo (B. bubalis), p.
Solanki. 2001. Kappa-casein genotyping of 200. In Proceedings of National Symposium
on domestic animals diversity: status,
opportunities and challenges, NBAGR,
Karnal.
255
Instructions for Authors Reference cited format
Buffalo Bulletin is published by International Buffalo Manuscripts should follow the name-year reference format.
Information Center under the authorization of Office of University Cite only necessary publications. Primary rather than secondary
Library, Kasetsart University, Thailand. Contributions on any aspect references should be cited, when possible. It is acceptable to cite work
of research or development, progress report of projects and news on that is “in press” (i.e., accepted but not yet published) with the pertinent
buffalo will be considered for publication in the bulletin. year and volume number of the reference.
In text. Cite publications in text with author name and
General editorial policies
year. Three or more authors use “et al.”. In parenthetical citations,
separate author and year with a comma. Use suffixes a, b and c to
Authorship criteria
separate publications in same year by the same author. Semi-colon
Authorship is restricted to those who (1) have contributed
separate citations of different authors. Cite two or more publications
substantially to one or more of the following aspects of the work and (2)
of different authors in chronological sequence, from earliest to latest.
are willing to assume public responsibility for the validity of the
work. For example:
Copyright ….used liquid nitrogen vapour freezing technique from Verma et al.
Copyright to published manuscripts becomes the sole (1975)
property of International Buffalo Information Center. ….liquid nitrogen vapour freezing technique (Verma et al., 1975)
…and buffaloes (Singh et al., 1983; Shah et al., 1987; Misra, 1996;
Criteria for manuscript acceptance Pant et al., 2002)
Manuscript acceptability is based on clarity of objectives;
In reference cited. List only those literature cited in the text.
originality; appropriateness of the experimental design, methods and
References should be listed alphabetically by the first author’s last
statistical analysis; substance of the results; thoroughness with which the
name. Single author precedes same author with co-authors. Type
results are discussed; and appropriateness of the conclusions.
references flush left as separate paragraphs. Do not indent manually.
Following acceptance of a paper and prior to publication, the
Write the name of book or journal in italic letters. Use the following
author will be received the acceptance letter.
format.
Manuscript requirements • Journal articles: Author(s). Year. Article title. Journal title,
volume number: inclusive pages.
Manuscripts preparation Example: Citation in text: Chaudhary et al. (1981)
Manuscripts on original research in English language should Choudhary, P.C., B. Prasad and S.K. Misra. 1981. Note on the use of
include at least the following elements. rumen liquor in the treatment of chronic alkaline indigestion in
Title cows. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 51: 356-360.
• Full title (be concise) • Books: Author(s) or editor(s). Year. Title. Publishername,Place
• Name(s) of author(s) and the first author of publication. Number of pages.
affiliation with complete address. Example: Citation in text: Snedecor and Cochram. (1980)
Abstract Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochram. 1980. Statistical Methods, 7 th ed.
• An abstract not exceeding 250 words; all The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. 593p.
acronyms and abbreviations defined; no Sattar, A. 1995. Studies on the effect of immunopotentiation of
references cited. State what, where and how it vaccinated pregnant buffaloes and cows on neonatal antibody
was done, major results. titre and hematological profile. Ph. D. thesis, University of
• Five key words. Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. 208p.
Introduction. Review pertinent work, cite key references, • Chapter: Author(s) of the chapter. Year. Title of the chapter,
explain importance of the research, and state objectives of pages of the chapter. In author(s) or editor(s). Title of the book.
your work. Publisher name, Place of publication.
Example: Citation in text: Sloss and Dufty. (1980)
Materials and Methods. Provide sufficient detail so work Sloss, V. and J.H. Dufty. 1980. Disorders during pregnancy,
can be repeated. Describe new methods in detail; accepted p. 88-97. In Sloss, V. and J.H. Dufty (eds.) Handbook of Bovine
methods briefly with references. Obstetrics. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, U.S.A.
Use of trade names. Trade names are to be Sabrani, M., K. Diwyanto and M. Winugroho 1994. A critical
avoided in defining products whenever possible. review of buffalo research and development activities in
Use of abbreviations and acronyms. At first text Indonesia. Past performanceand future strategies, p. 78-89. In
use, define in parentheses. Do not use abbreviations and Proceedings of 1 st Asian Buffalo Association Congress,
acronyms in titles. Thailand.
Results and discussion. Present results concisely using Submission manuscript
figures and tables as needed. Do not present the same Submit the following items.
information in figures and tables. Discuss principles and Cover letter. Identify the corresponding author and provide his/her
relationship, point out exception. Show agreement with full name, address, numbers for telephone and fax, and e-mail address.
published research work. The significances of work or Manuscript. In 12 point Times or Times New Roman. Type on one
conductions should be presented in the end of discussion. side of A4 paper. Use one inch margins. Number all pages. Send an
Tables. Number each table with Arabic numerals. Place a original manuscript and 1 photocopy.
Disk. Include an IBM-formatted, 3-1/2" disk or 4-3/4" CD-ROM,
descriptive caption at the top of each table.
containing the manuscript in Microsoft Word.
Figures. (graphs, charts, line drawings, photographs) Mail manuscript to:
Number each figure with Arabic numerals under the
By post: International Buffalo Information Center
illustration. Lettering, data lines and symbols must be
Office of University Library
sufficiently large so as to be clearly visible when the figure
Kasetsart University,
is reduced to a size commonly used in the journal. 50 Pahonyothin Road, Chatuchak,
References. List only those references cited in the text. Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Required format of described below. Tel. 66-2-942-8616
By e-mail: libibic@ku.ac.th
Buffalo Bulletin (September 2008) Vol.27 No.3
CONTENTS
Page
BUFFALO BULLETIN
IBIC, KASETSART UNIVERSITY, P.O. BOX 1084
BANGKOK 10903, THAILAND
URL : http://ibic.lib.ku.ac.th
E-mail : libibic@ku.ac.th
Tel : 66-2-9428616 ext. 344
Fax : 66-2-9406688