Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
January 2014
Customs: embryo
classification
of
human
There was a doubt as to whether frozen human embryo is classifiable in 3001, which covers glands and other organs for organo-therapeutic uses, or 0511, which covers animal products not elsewhere specified. Upon reference to the Indian Council of Medical Research, it was learnt that human embryo is categorized with animal embryos. Accordingly the CBEC has issued circular number 1/2014-Customs dated 9 January 2014, to instruct its field formations that frozen human embryos are classifiable in 05119999; and that the import is restricted and requires a no-objection certificate from the Indian Council of Medical Research. The circular can be seen at http://cbec.gov.in/customs/cs-circulars/cs-circ14/circ01-2014-cs.htm.
The matter of classification of the abovesaid items used in agricultural machinery was discussed at the recent conference of Chief Commissioners, and their decision has been issued as a circular by the CBEC. It was decided that the said transmission shafts/power take-off shafts cannot be classified as parts of general use and that they are correctly classifiable under heading 8483. The circular 2/2014-Customs dated 9 January 2014 can be perused at http://cbec.gov.in/customs/cs-circulars/cs-circ14/circ02-2014-cs.htm.
Central excise: CBEC clarifies on exemption for second substantial expansion of industry
In the context of exemption notifications for units that undertake substantial expansion (both location-specific and others), the CBEC has clarified that those that availed the benefit of earlier notifications 56 or
57/2002-CE will be eligible to avail the benefit of the later notification 1/2010-CE if they undertook a further substantial expansion. The CBEC circular 977/01/2014 dated 3 January 2014 can be seen at http://cbec.gov.in/excise/cx-circulars/cx-circ14/977-2014cx.htm.
Service tax: service recipient bound to reimburse service tax to service provider: HC
The petitioner, Bhagwati Security Services, did not pay service tax on services provided to BSNL. His service agreement also did not contain any provision for service tax. Subsequently the department demanded service tax and he paid it; but when he sought reimbursement from the client, the client refused, citing lack of any such clause in the agreement. The Allahabad High Court held that the tax is upon the person to whom service is provided, and the service provider is only a collecting agency. It directed BSNL to reimburse the service tax to the service provider. The judgment can be downloaded from: elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
Commission
begins
The central government had in October 2013 announced that it had set up a Tax Administration Reforms Commission: http://finmin.nic.in/press_room/2013/TARC21102013.pdf. The Commission will hold its first public consultation in Mumbai on 22 January 2014 and will thereafter move to Bangalore for consultations there. See http://finmin.nic.in/the_ministry/dept_revenue/stakeholdmeeting_tarc.as p.
Udyog has been successful in integrating iTAX with following the ERPs
Updated and written by Radha Arun [radha.arjuni@gmail.com], Consultant to Udyog Software (India) Ltd.
Udyog Software (India) Ltd. www.udyogsoftware.com Phone: 022-67993535 Email: ca-service@udyogsoftware.com | sales@udyogsoftware.com
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.