Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Summer Bioengineering Conference (SBC2009)

June 17-21, Resort at Squaw Creek, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA

SBC2009-206169

DEVELOPMENT OF A PATIENT-SPECIFIC NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT MODEL FOR


THE SIMULATION OF LUNG MOTION DURING CANCER RADIATION THERAPY

Jaesung Eom (1) , Chengyu Shi (2), George Xu (1), Suvranu De (1)

(1) Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and (2) Department of Radiation Oncology,


Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic University of Texas Health Science Center
Institute, Troy, New York at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

ABSTRACT The difficulty in finding accurate voxel matching between two images
Respiratory motion causes either over-dose to the tumor or under- has prompted the development of more accurate physics based
dose to the organ at risk in radiation therapy treatment for cancer. In techniques [2]. However, current models mostly apply displacement
order to characterize the motion, a nonlinear finite element model of boundary conditions to the lung model which is physiologically
the lungs has been developed based on 4D computed tomography (CT) incorrect.
data of a cancer patient with a tumor in the right lung. pressure-volume To overcome these problems, a patient specific non-linear finite
(PV) curve data was applied to deform the model in real time. element (FE) lung model which is simulated based on physiological
Realistic results are obtained when contact conditions are imposed conditions has been developed. During inspiration, the diaphragm and
between the pleura and the thoracic cavity. external intercostals contract, increasing the thoracic volume. The
resulting decrease in alveolar pressure causes air to enter the lungs.
INTRODUCTION Expiration, on the other hand, is passive and the diaphragm relaxes
Radiation therapy is one of the most effective cancer management reducing the thoracic volume and increasing the pressure. The chest
approaches. In external beam radiation treatment, a lethal radiation pressure-volume (PV) curve is constructed by plotting lung volumes
dose is delivered through precisely conformed external radiation to the against pleural pressures that are estimated from esophageal pressures
tumor while sparing the adjacent healthy tissues. However, the current [3]. We use such PV curve data to drive lung motion to simulate
paradigm is based on an assumption that both tumor location and breathing.
shape are known and remain unchanged during the course of radiation MATERIAL AND METHODS
delivery. Such a favorable rigid-body relationship does not exist in A finite element model of the lungs has been developed based on
anatomical sites such as the thoracic cavity and the abdomen, owing 4D CT images of a cancer patient with a tumor in the right lung.
predominantly to respiratory motions. When the tumor-bearing normal
organs move during radiation therapy, discrepancies between planned
and actually delivered radiation doses can be quite significant. As a
result, although higher radiation doses have shown better local tumor
control, organ motions have unfortunately required less aggressive
treatment strategies having relatively large dose margin to tolerate
potential targeting errors. Hence, it is important to be able to predict
lung motion as part of radiation therapy and know the tumor local in
real time.
Previously developed models have included image-based
techniques, e.g., deformable image registration (DIR) based method Figure 1. Geometric modeling with CAD surface
for respiratory motion has been introduced from 4D CT images in [1]. reconstruction

1 Copyright © 2009 by ASME


The 4D CT data was categorized based on external breathing curves RESULTS
into 10 phases. We contoured the 10 phase images into different ROIs The simulations have been carried out on an Intel Core2
(regions of interest). Subsequently, we selected the end of expiration Quadcore 2.83 GHz CPU machine with 8 GB RAM. Figure 3 shows
(EE) state and the end of inspiration (EI) states. In this study, we have the displacement field of the lung with and without contact conditions
used the CAD surface reconstruction approach to convert the ROIs at EI. It is clear that unless the pleural sliding is appropriately treated,
into FE meshes (Figure 1). The primary surfaces were generated from the relatively large lung motion in SI direction is not captured.
ROI contour lines in Rhinoceros 3D (Robert McNeel & Associates, Tracking tumor motion is a central issue of this research. In
Seattle, WA). From these surfaces, NURBS-based CAD surfaces were Figure 4 we plot the displacement of the center of the tumor over a
reconstructed and converted into suitable FE meshes using breathing cycle. In [5] it has been reported that the average tumor
HYPERMESH (Altair Engineering, Troy, MI). This approach greatly motion at the upper lobe are 1.47 (SD=0.98) mm in the LR direction,
simplifies the procedure presented in [2] which includes iso-surface 2.33 (1.016) mm in SI direction, and 1.95 (1.01) mm in the AP
construction, several iterative mesh smoothing, relaxing and direction [5]. As shown in Figure 4, tumor motions at EI (2s in
decimation. It also gave us better flexibility to build a FE model than breathing time) are within the range of this motion.
conventional mesh construction from CT scans. The FE model had
 LR   AP   SI   Magnitude
66704 tetrahedral elements and 55947 dofs in total (Figure 2). 0.35
0.30
Tumor = GTV
(Nonlinear material) 0.25
0.20

Displacement (cm)
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
-0.05
-0.10
-0.15
-0.20
Lungs -0.25
Body = Thoracic Cavity
(Nonlinear material)
(Linear material) -0.30
0 1 2 3 4
Figure 2. Finite element models including a body (Thoracic
cavity), a tumor (Gross target volume) and lungs Breathing time (s)
Figure 4. Displacement at the center of the lungs over a
The lung tissue has been modeled as a hyperelastic material with breathing cycle
the following expression [4] DISCUSSION
0W  c exp  a1Exx2  a2 E yy2  2a4 Exx E yy   c exp  a1Ex2x  a2 Ezz2
1 1 We have presented a non-linear FE model of lung motion for
2 2 (1) radiation therapy. For the first time, we have used the physiologically
2a4 Exx Ezz   c exp  a1Ezz2  a2 E yy2  2a4 Ezz E yy 
1 relevant PV curve data to simulate respiratory motion. The PV
2 relationship enables simulation of the lung over the entire breathing
where 0W is the strain energy per unit volume, c, a1, a2, a4 are cycle. In terms of modeling, we have used the CAD surface
material constants derived from experiments, and Exx, Exy etc. are the reconstruction approach to construct the computational mesh from 4D
components of the Green strain. CT scanned images. This avoids multiple smoothing procedures and
A distributed time varying pressure load is applied to the surface increases accuracy. Measurement and characterization of the PV
of the lung model. The pressure is obtained from a sinusoidal PV curve is our next goal.
curve. Notably, the PV curve represents the elastic properties of the
lung including nonlinearity with the lung becoming stiffer at higher ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
volumes and hysteresis between inflation and deflation. The The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the funding support
simulation is carries out using a standard finite element software code from NIH/NLM grant R01LM009362. The first author would also like
ABAQUS (Dassault Systems, Providence, RI). Frictionless contact is to acknowledge fruitful discussions with Mr. Y. Na.
modeled between the lungs and the thoracic cavity.
REFERENCE
1. Yang, D., et al., 4DCT Motion Estimation and Modeling.
Medical Physics, 2008. 35: p. 2938.
2. Al-Mayah, A., J. Moseley, and K. Brock, Contact surface and
material nonlinearity modeling of human lungs. PHYSICS IN
MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008. 53(1): p. 305
3. West, J., Respiratory Physiology: The Essentials. 7 ed. 2007:
Williams & Wilkins.
4. ZENG, Y., D. YAGER, and Y. FUNG, Measurement of the
mechanical properties of the human lung tissue. Journal of
Biomechanical Engineering, 1987. 109(2): p. 169-174.
5. Seppenwoolde, Y., et al., Precise and real-time measurement of
Figure 3. Displacement of the right lung at EI in (cm) a) with 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat,
contact condition, b) without contact condition measured during radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation
Oncology Biology Physics, 2002. 53: p. 822-834.

2 Copyright © 2009 by ASME

Potrebbero piacerti anche