how many seconds are required to send a 10 gig byte file from USA to India?

Only one mapping pair (couple x = (signed, unsigned), couple y = (measurable, no n measurable)) could be the next processing of measured data transfer across any transmission's processing for better basic built in behavior of modeling centri c metric black box (as first sequential digital data could exceed sizes for furt her application of uncertainty mathematical intentional mode's insight) Signed Said Mchaalia = sqr(sin()) XOR sqr(cos()) to be integrated within an all on one chip to perform basic built in binary behavior all time Thanks to Said Mchaalia and all found his team inside internet how is it going within new tech? See best of me in hacking Beat H-tech is equal to "simple single set {gathering && handling event result flows across time or around ties}. kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss then just see just see yours yours eg's lips = end of legs = void functionism to be modeled by I super across X kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss then just see just see yours yours eg's lips = end of legs = void functionism to be modeled by I super across X kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss then just see just see yours yours eg's lips = end of legs = void functionism to be modeled by I super across X kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss then just see just see yours yours eg's lips = end of legs = void functionism to be modeled by I super across X$ Dear readers, Hello all, Hello my hot pussy, so far I am cumming when think of your leg to be so far open to see behind the s lip, and image your neat shaved lips open so slow then close so slow allow me to bring my penis between my hands then to order more wider then wider until I see the inner lips and measure the right diameter for mine to enter so hard :-) kiss over face right or left kiss over there until arriving to mouth to flow wit hin surround smile I want to kiss inside, think about my hot pussy so yeah so far for more lust so nice for like mIsA for any time nearest to your hot pussy, when open and close is the belongin g pair for any intentional map of Susanne && Said = in bed at any test try for l ust pastime = forever forgiven and love Said Mchaalia In the first of second January 2014 to serve any Future for launch new liable lo gics by Said Mchaalia and co (write name as follows) :: NOT x = (1 - truth(x)) x AND y = minimum(truth(x), truth(y)) x OR y = maximum(truth(x), truth(y)) could be new designed as mapping pair of (sqr(sin(), sqr(cos()) just read attachment files for more information about complete integration of di screte event simulation principles encircling within event = (integer n such as yours yours = your l Me = Said Mchaalia = yours yours = your l Me = Said Mchaalia = yours yours = your l Me = Said Mchaalia = yours yours = your l Me = Said Mchaalia =

t=n.T, (f(x), g(y)) for any mapping pair (x, y)) Said Mchaalia to enhance inside implementing mounting intentional intelligence i nsight of discrete event simulation principles encircling within event = (intege r n such as t=n.T, (f(x), g(y)) for any mapping pair (x, y)). x = sqr[sin()cos()] / sqr[sqr[sin()] - sqr[cos()] ] y = sqr[sqr[sin()] - sqr[cos()] ] / sqr[sin()cos()] (x, y) mapping pair rule any possible probable dynamic design of chaotic or fuzz y or probabilistic or stochastic or statistical modulation across any applied ma thematical intentional intelligence insight around system economy or financial f ashion flow or robust control or transmission transportation modeling and design or others. Hence, the next rule within any financial effect aspect is the implemented inten tional integration of (1/6, 4/5) of any possible probable product within associa te incoming money X, thus, incoming money X Y = X - X/6 (4*Y)/5 is four possible probable sensitive sensible cases, which are: 1. homeless human persons, 2. any human whose family link is cut off 3. any family construction through new basic neat networking behavior of (link, blink) principle mounting dynamics. 4. for any helpers looking to improve and ameliorate any symbolic surround life style leaf like this name "Said Mchaalia" I, Said Mchaalia, would like to send you my last hot news: Join jury electrical "OR" net design, which burn event result flows (to build w hen is equal burn = so it is Mchaalia Arabic into English translation). Thus th e famous Jesus Embedded Net Design "OR" for basic event result = Jumps exciting Net design into operating units, which are built inside environment reverse (Ein stein's fast time measurement proceeding) This is done in my draft paper 2013: Cloud computing jumping event neutralism design, which is thought up basic event result flows across time writer: Said Mchaalia (first draft copy start on May 1st 2013)

Abstract: Cloud computing is very interest off-line as leaf like on-line simulation. Uwe S chwiegelsohn [1] did prove that a virtual eventual basic logical inside simulati

on is needed for describing cloud computing. Although, this eventual basic logic al inside synchronization is a virtual vogue in proceeding processing, whose val uable variables are the (left, right) rotation motion of any robot mobile such t hat the soccer player, the manufacturing image maker (in space motion within wir eless sending of capturing images for all linked satellites, etc ...). Introduction: In fact, cloud computing is a vogue into setting forth: (1) the visible fast "a s if "into electric shadow, (2) laud voice in the reverently vogue; (3)probable chemical compostion for water production(2H+O=H2O) and (4) under constraint valu able variables. Hence, the "as if" could jump into "what if" inserting inspiration in probable f ormulation vogues in current digital data flow fashion (modulation's need is a m athematical formulation in square[sin[g(t,f)]], energy flow is a formulation of integration{PowerPoint at time t} during a [n.T] time intervals. Thus, Lempel an d Ziv in year 1978 did their waveform compression algorithms based on currently vogue needs, whereby either the on-line or the off-line digital simulation and v erification needs huge of storage space to be used in the next step of elaborati on phase [2]. In fact, the "under constraint"conditions allow the valuable variables to be col or composition processing whose interest vogues are in (white,black) dream cream couples. Therefore, compose color is equal to add ratio of white light color to initial black color. The Earth's moon is a fatal formulated example, when the NOT(exist of Earth's Mo on) = black color of its famous place. Otherwise, the add(ratio of light white color) = be full in exact 14 days of its second appearance. Is this true? This question permits a fuzzy proceeding in ba sic logics inside systems. Though, lossy data of electrical shadow during any cloud computing has many manu facturing features, which are proposal outward appearances ( thus, Earth's quart er is a white light color till the last quarter, which never allow a long stay o n it, because it will disappear in approximately 8 days). Therefore, manufacturi ng features are in "hand-ons" of "across any currently vogue". In fact two primordial principle thread tasks are operating in cloud computing p rocessing, such that, (i) light, which has been to be identified, and (ii) veloc ity, which should be a measurable core. Hence, it measures the movable distance of clear visible volume (volume= subsurface integration during time dt) during a quantity amount of micro-seconds. In fact, lighting a volume requires deep investigation in Grid simulation (from electricity production, which has been started by rotation motion of turbines to distributing of equi-quantity amounts for all connected electricity consumers U we Schwiegelsohn did explain such scheduling jobs in his 2012 paper [1]). In the other hand, "cloud computing" is scheduling jobs in parallel simulation, whereby, whose measurable cores are metric quantity amounts such that: electrici ty production, voice production, visible light color production, chemical compos ition production, water for end user production, etc ... In spite of digital signal processing (DSP), cloud computing processing events a re measurable cores in all scheduling jobs and parallel thread task, which were detailed in Grahman's 1966 paper: Scheduling jobs in parallel simulation [3].

In fact, propagation of produced light during cloud computing is a "virtual in c urrently vogue" formulation joining "emit rays" designs. Even though, based on formulation joining "emit rays" designs, the fatal famous formulation form of the propagation of produced light during cloud computing is so defined: V = f(e, s, n, m, l) . v = is a valuable variable vogue describing what will be occurred (happen). . e = is event occurrence during s micro-seconds. . s = s float number of micro-seconds for an event to occur inside the cloud com puting simulation. . n = is nil value (0) for origins and symmetry scheduling jobs: from white to b lack, I need a symmetry origin = n. . m = is main manufacturing design: water = chemical composition if true of 2H + O =H2O should be scheduled and produce jobs. . l = is local liable logical language inside system synchronization: after clou d computing => tha produced water is extreme enough for drink, during cloud comp uting stored produced light inside capacitors is useful for any electrical energ y flows across time, etc ... In fact, in "currently vogue" of cloud computing, the fatal factors are the "wha t if" and the "as if" inserting inspiration items, whereby "what if" inspiratio n if enough nuclear design basics of event result flows around test and try in d igital verification. Although, "as if" inspiration is operation processing, such that mathematical operands in forms of processes to be running during simulatio n times. I. Safe Synchronization of "in currently vogue" motion of cloud computing: Indeed, moving clouds to be computed is "jack-ins" exciting design basics of eve nt result flows around ties. In winter, the north part of Earth (Norway, Finland , Denmark, Uk, etc...) has more enough cloud, which allow water and snow to be e asy produced, however this will then be happened in the southern part in summer. Hence, how clouds are moving and controlled? The answer to this question allow fictitious understanding of "in currently vogue" motion during computing: I want to move left, right, behind, front off and so on exactly true leaf like clouds during the famous hand-on adages "count a day away to be 12 months a year". Furt hermore, the "in currently vogue" motion during any computing proceeding is link ed to stochastic ratios: in just one month how were clouds computed? was any wat er or snow produced as result flows of this cloud computing during this month? In fact, the basic logics inside synchronization is an "in currently vogue" mot ion during any computing proceeding, whose basic event ratios are jumping (event occurrence: if clock'event && clock'value==1 do { } end if;) exciting design d uring time intervals (across time and around ties) in digital forms : t = n.T, w here T is a defined shored period, which could be easy realesed from transistor transition language (TTL), and T <= NOT(T) after x nan-seconds, should be a sche duling jobs of any TTL languages. II/ Join jurry electric "OR" net designs burning event result flows (to burn = t o build; I want to be, I want to see "born to make you happy from Britney Spears ") In fact, jump to jaw electrical net designs of "OR" that is built for event res ult flows ( to burn = to build; I want to be, I want to see "born to make you ha ppy from Britney Spears"), is the just Jesus extern nuclear die, whom operating

unities (Kaufmann Kohler; Unicity of Godhood) bind basic environment reality. The (Exit E, Out O) dream couple is always used to drill the incoming current fl ows for any electrical tool such as all actual home depot wares. In fact, the aim object of Said Mchaalia, Uwe Schwiegelsohn, Kao Odej, Susan Web er and many others is the bring up "Bridges into Gaps" Therefore, from the picture defined above, we could inspire a hot jumping exciti ng nuclear deign for "OR" burrowing environment reality, which is so defined " m y motor should flow sometimes lefts, other times rights". Indeed, Sony firm did this modeling design into just one block box nuclear design within its play stat ions: from 2 until now. This nice beautiful operating processing within "P-N or N-P" jack-ins' junctions permit "hand-ons" for "adages bridge gaps" design; for example the Professor Kao Odej could from just hand-on sheet bring many "jawing exciting net design operating under basic environment reality flows, which are C ontrol Data Flow Graph transition translation into handling event result flows a cross times (See Said Mchaalia's wave-report.pdf, whereby the control data flow graph could be then applied to reduce the waveform compression algorithms and to produce SusiCompress.exe" III/ Jack-ins exciting net designs operating under basic event result flows: In fact, from the start up of electricity (17xy) in United Kingdom, the main ope rating unit of electricity is the Capacitor C(x micro Farads, y Volts). Thus, what is exactly a Capacitor? Is it a response reaction time to allow incom ing current to flow any where deep nets? Or is it a source bridge gap for bring up envisaged electrical energy when it is required as it is current in new vogue so define for the DDR3 and may be DDR4 or DDRN net design operating under basic event result flows of "HOLD when it is required". Even though, diode waveforms are equivalent to capacitors' languages: by the way s that they hold electrical energies in short times. Therefore, the description maths for any diode is a function of expo(f(time)), whereby it is to remember th at d[expo(f(time))]/dtime = {d[f(time)]/dtime}.[expo(f(time))] In fact, the safe compute the needed time for storage electrical energy inside d iode or capacitor a calculation of derivation function should be done. Therefore (should, schedule) jobs are the most bridge gaps inside timing calculation as S aid Mchaalia did it within its paper: wave-report.pdf. On the other hand, firms for co-processors or processors leaf like Motorola, Int el, Sun, AMD, etc could best understand the meaningfulness of Said Mchaalia's Wa ve-report.pdf, whereby the safe science of secret synchronization was thought t hrough for think thou! Hence, just exciting nuclear design for operating to understand basic event resu lt flows is the following " Cloud computing" model defined in the next picture: Symbolic synchronized fashion owner's focus ons = {(frequent, at), (m = move, i = invest), (scaling<up, down>, custom<adjust, consumer>)}surround smart signal a dvances and system's architecture across mode's insight and modeling's intellige nce Said Mchaalia (draft copy, October 20th 2013) In fact, the major intentional secret across robust control and transmission's t ransportation dynamics has to be a review involving within Symbolic synchronized fashion owner's focus ons = {(frequent, at), (m = move, i = invest), (scaling<u p, down>, custom<adjust, consumer>)}. Thus, to define any symbol in the corresponding list of symbolic synchronized fa

shion owner's focus ons = {(frequent, at), (m = move, i = invest), (scaling<up, down>, custom<adjust, consumer>)}, the following fatal function form's descripti on should be envisage: 1. frequent = occurring or done many times at short intervals: frequent changes in policy the showers will become heavier and more frequent [attributive] (of a person) doing something often; habitual: a frequent visitor to Scotland archaic found at short distances apart: walls flanked by frequent square towers 2. at = the chemical element astatine. 3. mapping pair (m = move, i = invest) has to play the major most role rule insi de the processor's architecture's design. Hence, {m=move} is designed for a logi cal language of speed up across any timing simulation:= for mobile robot, for mu sic play, for video decoding, for running any C/C++/Cox or Java programs, etc .. . Furthermore, the {i = invest} is the huge hard hierarchy home of designing proce ssor's architectures around knowledge culture of human needs and environment rea lity flows := heavy simulation (Earth's planet's simulations, deep blue similar chess players, etc ..). Thus, invest inside the across computing dynamic design concerns the secret deep investigation of black square, whereby the primordial p rinciple kernel motor flow is the discrete event simulation involving within a s imilar fuzzy-mimetic approach of generating filtering design for any possible an d probable mathematical intentional secret across modeling's intelligence and mo de's inspiration, whereby the major most intention is the +infinite value for an y fashion owner. In fact, invest involves following mathematical intentional symbols : i. clear = (-1 + 1/[sqr[cos()]) + (-1 + 1/[sqr[sin()]) = (-1 + ratio of 1 to [sq r[cos()]) + (-1 + ratio of 1 to [sqr[sin()]) ii. dark = sqr[tg()] + 1/sqr[tg()] = sqr[tg()] + ratio of 1 to sqr[tg()] iii. logics language of function "OR" requires to involve this function "OR" wit hin the discrete event simulation inside the slice window of possible steps = ]2 .k.pi, 5.k.pi/2[ and ]5.k.pi/2, (2.k+1).pi[. Figure 1: Symbolic synchronized fashion owner's focus ons = {(frequent, at), (m = move, i = invest), (scaling<up, down>, custom<adjust, consumer>)}surround sma rt signal advances and system's architecture across mode's insight and modeling' s intelligence. In fact, figure 1 illustrates the main real operating principles of symbolic syn chronized fashion owner's focus ons = {(frequent, at), (m = move, i = invest), ( scaling<up, down>, custom<adjust, consumer>)}surround smart signal advances and system's architecture across mode's insight and modeling's intelligence. Thus, to divide these slice's step intervals (]2.k.pi, 5.k.pi/2[ and ]5.k.pi/2, (2.k+1).pi[) into new slice's step's intervals, a mathematical intentional secr et surround adjustments mounting insight is then considered as follows: for any logical parameters x, y, :: x OR y = sub(x, y) inside any mathematical i nsight involving within the corner's float dynamic encoding design. Thus, (-1 + 1/[sqr[cos()]) OR (-1 + 1/[sqr[sin()]) => (-1 + 1/[sqr[cos()]) - ( -1 + 1/[sqr[sin()]) = (1/[sqr[cos()]) - (1/[sqr[sin()]) = ([sqr[sin()] - [sqr[co s()]) /[[sqr[cos()].[sqr[sin()]] = ratio of ([sqr[sin()] - [sqr[cos()]) to [[sqr [cos()].[sqr[sin()]], which has to be investigated in deep to prove that the sli ding window slice dynamics is working well by the inventing of theses functions

( y = (-1 + 1/[sqr[cos()]), z = (-1 + 1/[sqr[sin()])) to describe any possible probable fuzzy mimetic approaches within the discrete event principles. Figure 2: main real principles of robust control inside symbolic synchronized fa shion owner's focus ons = {(frequent, at), (m = move, i = invest), (scaling<up, down>, custom<adjust, consumer>)}surround smart signal advances and system's arc hitecture across mode's insight and modeling's intelligence. In fact, figure 2 shows the main real principles of robust control inside symbol ic synchronized fashion owner's focus ons = {(frequent, at), (m = move, i = inve st), (scaling<up, down>, custom<adjust, consumer>)}surround smart signal advance s and system's architecture across mode's insight and modeling's intelligence. H ence, the mathematical intentional amount quantity = (1/[sqr[cos()]) - (1/[sqr[s in()]) = ([sqr[sin()] - [sqr[cos()]) /[[sqr[cos()].[sqr[sin()]] = ratio of ([sqr [sin()] - [sqr[cos()]) to [[sqr[cos()], is used to divide the interval of using filtering inside the desirable aim object of any possible probable discrete even t simulation engendering the main real operating dynamics of corner's float dyna mic encoding design, whereby the mapping pair of {(m = move, i = invest)} across any possible probable corner should be evolving within the old mathematical des cription of {(tour = 2.pi = sin() or cos(), when rotate across a pi/2 corner, it is possible to meet a tangent() = tg() = TAN() valuable variable, hence the not (clear) mobile path is defined by the "ratio", when clear = sqr[tg()], then not( clear) = 1/sqr[tg()] = ratio of 1 to sqr[tg()]. Therefore, within the waveform c ompression principles, a clear bits (for surround sound quality, Dolby digital q uality or stereo quality) has to involve the processing across mapping pair cust om<adjust, consumer>, whereby custom = current edge flow, which is required to i mprove the chosen of found quality from a possible low quality consumer to reach highest level consumer (surround sound). Thus, custom = current edge flow requi res the knowledge culture of hardware logics language to ameliorate the best wis hed quality of any probable sound, this is the main real principle of any mp4/mp 3/.../mp6 players, whereby the main real operating dynamics is the custom = curr ent edge flow = function form to fix any reachable desirable quality. Furthermor e, this principle has to play the main role rule within the waveform compression of Lempel and Ziv, whereby missing bytes is the desirable reachable aim object to get the best compression ratio and to allow the decompression algorithm to be better intelligenter by inserting what if this a flow of mapping pair (think up , think through) dynamics across any possible probable reconstruction of any mis sing byte due to the huge hard hierarchy homes of ratio investigation across the design map of (compression, decompression) mechanism for any media format: int index = 0; char c = '0'; char* pch = &c; while (eof(fptr)) fscanf(fptr, "%c", pch) if ((map<char, vector<int>>).find(pch)) { ((map<char, vector<int>>).second).push_back(index++); } else { ((map<char, vector<int>>).insert(pch); ((map<char, vector<int>>).second).push_back(index++); } On the other hand, to define ratios just follow as follows: ratio = r = sqr[cos()] = ((map<char, vector<int>>).second).size() / [sum(((map<c har, vector<int>>).second).size()) + 1]

= ratio of ((map<char, vector<int>>).second).size() to [sum(((map<char, vector< int>>).second).size()) + 1] OR ratio = r = sqr[sin()] = ((map<char, vector<int>>).second).size() / [sum(((map<c har, vector<int>>).second).size()) + 1] = ratio of ((map<char, vector<int>>).second).size() to [sum(((map<char, vector< int>>).second).size()) + 1] Hence, built in float dynamic encoding by = OR = "-": (sqr[cos()] = ((map<char, vector<int>>).second).size() / [sum(((map<char, vector <int>>).second).size()) + 1] ] ) (sqr[sin()] = ((map<char, vector<int>>).second).size() / [sum(((map<char, vecto r<int>>).second).size()) + 1] I, Said Mchaalia, would like to send you my last hot news: Join jury electrical "OR" net design, which burn event result flows (to build w hen is equal burn = so it is Mchaalia Arabic into English translation). Thus th e famous Jesus Embedded Net Design "OR" for basic event result = Jumps exciting Net design into operating units, which are built inside environment reverse (Ein stein's fast time measurement proceeding) This is done in my draft paper 2013: Cloud computing jumping event neutralism design, which is thought up basic event result flows across time writer: Said Mchaalia (first draft copy start on May 1st 2013)

Abstract: Cloud computing is very interest off-line as leaf like on-line simulation. Uwe S chwiegelsohn [1] did prove that a virtual eventual basic logical inside simulati on is needed for describing cloud computing. Although, this eventual basic logic al inside synchronization is a virtual vogue in proceeding processing, whose val uable variables are the (left, right) rotation motion of any robot mobile such t hat the soccer player, the manufacturing image maker (in space motion within wir eless sending of capturing images for all linked sattelites, etc ...). Introduction: In fact, cloud computing is a vogue into setting forth: (1) the visible fast "a s if "into electric shadow, (2) laud voice in the reverently vogue; (3)probable chemical compostion for water production(2H+O=H2O) and (4) under constraint valu able variables. Hence, the "as if" could jump into "what if" inserting inspiration in probable f ormulation vogues in current digital data flow fashion (modulation's need is a m athematical formulation in square[sin[g(t,f)]], energy flow is a formulation of integration{PowerPoint at time t} during a [n.T] time intervals. Thus, Lempel an

d Ziv in year 1978 did their waveform compression algorithms based on currently vogue needs, whereby either the on-line or the off-line digital simulation and v erification needs huge of storage space to be used in the next step of elaborati on phase [2]. In fact, the "under constraint"conditions allow the valuable variables to be col or composition processing whose interest vogues are in (white,black) dream cream couples. Therefore, compose color is equal to add ratio of white light color to initial black color. The Earth's moon is a fatal formulated example, when the NOT(exist of Earth's Mo on) = black color of its famous place. Otherwise, the add(ratio of light white color) = be full in exact 14 days of its second appearance. Is this true? This question permits a fuzzy proceeding in ba sic logics inside systems. Though, lossy data of electrical shadow during any cloud computing has many manu facturing features, which are proposal outward appearances ( thus, Earth's quart er is a white light color till the last quarter, which never allow a long stay o n it, because it will disappear in approximately 8 days). Therefore, manufacturi ng features are in "hand-ons" of "across any currently vogue". In fact two primordial principle thread tasks are operating in cloud computing p rocessing, such that, (i) light, which has been to be identified, and (ii) veloc ity, which should be a measurable core. Hence, it measures the movable distance of clear visible volume (volume= subsurface integration during time dt) during a quantity amount of micro-seconds. In fact, lighting a volume requires deep investigation in Grid simulation (from electricity production, which has been started by rotation motion of turbines to distributing of equi-quantity amounts for all connected electricity consumers U we Schwiegelsohn did explain such scheduling jobs in his 2012 paper [1]). In the other hand, "cloud computing" is scheduling jobs in parallel simulation, whereby, whose measurable cores are metric quantity amounts such that: electrici ty production, voice production, visible light color production, chemical compos ition production, water for end user production, etc ... In spite of digital signal processing (DSP), cloud computing processing events a re measurable cores in all scheduling jobs and parallel thread task, which were detailed in Grahman's 1966 paper: Scheduling jobs in parallel simulation [3]. In fact, propagation of produced light during cloud computing is a "virtual in c urrently vogue" formulation joining "emit rays" designs. Even though, based on formulation joining "emit rays" designs, the fatal famous formulation form of the propagation of produced light during cloud computing is so defined: V = f(e, s, n, m, l) . v = is a valuable variable vogue describing what will be occurred (happen). . e = is event occurrence during s micro-seconds. . s = s float number of micro-seconds for an event to occur inside the cloud com puting simulation. . n = is nil value (0) for origins and symmetry scheduling jobs: from white to b lack, I need a symmetry origin = n. . m = is main manufacturing design: water = chemical composition if true of 2H + O =H2O should be scheduled and produce jobs.

. l = is local liable logical language inside system synchronization: after clou d computing => tha produced water is extreme enough for drink, during cloud comp uting stored produced light inside capacitors is useful for any electrical energ y flows across time, etc ... In fact, in "currently vogue" of cloud computing, the fatal factors are the "wha t if" and the "as if" inserting inspiration items, whereby "what if" inspiratio n if enough nuclear design basics of event result flows around test and try in d igital verification. Although, "as if" inspiration is operation processing, such that mathematical operands in forms of processes to be running during simulatio n times. I. Safe Synchronization of "in currently vogue" motion of cloud computing: Indeed, moving clouds to be computed is "jack-ins" exciting design basics of eve nt result flows around ties. In winter, the north part of Earth (Norway, Finland , Denmark, Uk, etc...) has more enough cloud, which allow water and snow to be e asy produced, however this will then be happened in the southern part in summer. Hence, how clouds are moving and controlled? The answer to this question allow fictitious understanding of "in currently vogue" motion during computing: I want to move left, right, behind, front off and so on exactly true leaf like clouds during the famous hand-on adages "count a day away to be 12 months a year". Furt hermore, the "in currently vogue" motion during any computing proceeding is link ed to stochastic ratios: in just one month how were clouds computed? was any wat er or snow produced as result flows of this cloud computing during this month? In fact, the basic logics inside synchronization is an "in currently vogue" mot ion during any computing proceeding, whose basic event ratios are jumping (event occurrence: if clock'event && clock'value==1 do { } end if;) exciting design d uring time intervals (across time and around ties) in digital forms : t = n.T, w here T is a defined shored period, which could be easy realized from transistor transition language (TTL), and T <= NOT(T) after x nano-seconds, should be a sch eduling jobs of any TTL languages. II/ Join jury electric "OR" net designs burning event result flows (to burn = to build; I want to be, I want to see "born to make you happy from Britney Spears" ) In fact, jump to jaw electrical net designs of "OR" that is built for event res ult flows ( to burn = to build; I want to be, I want to see "born to make you ha ppy from Britney Spears"), is the just Jesus extern nuclear die, whom operating unities (Kaufmann Kohler; Unicity of Godhood) bind basic environment reality. The (Exit E, Out O) dream couple is always used to drill the incoming current fl ows for any electrical tool such as all actual home depot wares. In fact, the aim object of Said Mchaalia, Uwe Schwiegelsohn, Kao Odej, Susan Web er and many others is the bring up "Bridges into Gaps" Therefore, from the picture defined above, we could inspire a hot jumping exciti ng nuclear deign for "OR" burrowing environment reality, which is so defined " m y motor should flow sometimes lefts, other times rights". Indeed, Sony firm did this modeling design into just one block box nuclear design within its play stat ions: from 2 until now. This nice beautiful operating processing within "P-N or N-P" jack-ins' junctions permit "hand-ons" for "adages bridge gaps" design; for example the Professor Kao Odej could from just hand-on sheet bring many "jawing exciting net design operating under basic environment reality flows, which are C ontrol Data Flow Graph transition translation into handling event result flows a cross times (See Said Mchaalia's wave-report.pdf, whereby the control data flow graph could be then applied to reduce the waveform compression algorithms and to produce SusiCompress.exe"

III/ Jack-ins exciting net designs operating under basic event result flows: In fact, from the start up of electricity (17xy) in United Kingdom, the main ope rating unit of electricity is the Capacitor C(x micro Farads, y Volts). Thus, what is exactly a Capacitor? Is it a response reaction time to allow incom ing current to flow any where deep nets? Or is it a source bridge gap for bring up envisaged electrical energy when it is required as it is current in new vogue so define for the DDR3 and may be DDR4 or DDRN net design operating under basic event result flows of "HOLD when it is required". Even though, diodes for waveform are equivalent to capacitors' languages: by th e ways that they hold electrical energies in short times. Therefore, the descrip tion maths for any diode is a function of expo(f(time)), whereby it is to rememb er that d[expo(f(time))]/dtime = {d[f(time)]/dtime}.[expo(f(time))] In fact, the safe compute the needed time for storage electrical energy inside d iode or capacitor a calculation of derivation function should be done. Therefore (should, schedule) jobs are the most bridge gaps inside timing calculation as S aid Mchaalia did it within its paper: wave-report.pdf. On the other hand, firms for co-processors or processors leaf like Motorola, Int el, Sun, AMD, etc could best understand the meaningfulness of Said Mchaalia's Wa ve-report.pdf, whereby the safe science of secret synchronization was thought t hrough for think thou! Hence, just exciting nuclear design for operating to understand basic event resu lt flows is the following " Cloud computing" model defined in the next picture:

Sincerely, Said Mchaalia