Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Feminism Ks
Feminism Ks...........................................................................................................................................................1
International Relations 1NC (1/)..............................................................................................................................................................9
&in' ( Realism/Securit)...................................................................................................................................... 12
Link Realism/Security........................................................................................................................................................................13
&in' ( Realism/Securit)...................................................................................................................................... 1%
Link tilitarianism..............................................................................................................................................................................1!
&in' ( *tilitarianism........................................................................................................................................... 1+
Link "omen#s $m%o&erment ...........................................................................................................................................................1'
&in' ( 4mission................................................................................................................................................... 15
Link *mission.....................................................................................................................................................................................19
&in' ( 4mission................................................................................................................................................... 1$
Link ,roli-eration................................................................................................................................................................................20
&in' ( Proli6eration............................................................................................................................................. 20
Link .e/emony/0ilitarism/.umanitarianism....................................................................................................................................21
&in' ( 7egemon)/8ilitarism/7umanitarianism.............................................................................................. 21
Link 1emocracy .................................................................................................................................................................................22
&in' ( Democrac)................................................................................................................................................21
Link International Institutions.............................................................................................................................................................2(
&in' ( I;&a0.........................................................................................................................................................%1
Link I5La&..........................................................................................................................................................................................32
&in' ( I;&a0.........................................................................................................................................................%2
Link I5La& .........................................................................................................................................................................................33
&in' ( I;&a0.........................................................................................................................................................%+
Link Nukes .........................................................................................................................................................................................3'
&in' ( u'es.........................................................................................................................................................%$
Link State ...........................................................................................................................................................................................!0
&in' ( IR ..............................................................................................................................................................+%
Im/act ( ,ar........................................................................................................................................................+3
Im%act Laun3ry List............................................................................................................................................................................!+
Im/act ; &iberalism............................................................................................................................................. 10
Im%act .el%er ,atriarc6y Root Cause o- "ar....................................................................................................................................'1
<lt ( .thnogra/h)............................................................................................................................................... 11
7lt Sol9ency 5 Re:ection........................................................................................................................................................................')
./istemolog) First............................................................................................................................................... 22
In3i9i3ual 7ction <ey ...........................................................................................................................................................................(3
<:@ Perm.............................................................................................................................................................. 21
74= ,erm................................................................................................................................................................................................((
<:@ Perm.............................................................................................................................................................. 22
74= ,erm/Link >eni/n Lo/ic/Reason................................................................................................................................................()
<2@ Realism...........................................................................................................................................................25
72= Realism ..........................................................................................................................................................................................(9
<2@ Realism/Deterrence.......................................................................................................................................30
74= Realism...........................................................................................................................................................................................)1
<:@ Realism..........................................................................................................................................................31
74= Realism ..........................................................................................................................................................................................)2
<:@ Realism..........................................................................................................................................................3%
74= Realism...........................................................................................................................................................................................)!
<:@ Realism..........................................................................................................................................................3+
74= Not Real "orl3...............................................................................................................................................................................)'
<:@ .ssentialism.................................................................................................................................................. 32
74= >utler..............................................................................................................................................................................................))
<:@ Autler.............................................................................................................................................................33
74= Social Constructi9ism Not 4rue.....................................................................................................................................................)+
===<66 <ns0ers===.............................................................................................................................................. 52
7--= No 7lt Sol9ency.............................................................................................................................................................................+3
Juris/ru9ence 1 ! "1/%#..................................................................................................................................... $2
Auris%ru3ence 1NC (2/3)........................................................................................................................................................................9)
Juris/ru9ence 1 ! "2/%#..................................................................................................................................... $3
Auris%ru3ence 1NC (3/3)........................................................................................................................................................................9+
Juris/ru9ence 1 ! "%/%#..................................................................................................................................... $5
Link State............................................................................................................................................................................................99
&in' ( State...........................................................................................................................................................$$
Link 5 State...........................................................................................................................................................................................100
&in' ( State.........................................................................................................................................................102
Link State .........................................................................................................................................................................................10!
Im/act ( 4//ression/4therization...................................................................................................................111
Im%act Nuclear .olocaust.................................................................................................................................................................11(
4ur Kriti' isn-t limite9 to militar) >iolenceD but the securit) /ara9igm inherent 0ith the masculine 0ar machine !ohn an9 Ru99ic' % (CarolC Researc6er an3 4eac6er at .ar9ar3 0e3ical Si/nsC an3 SaraC aut6orC 7 ;eminist
$t6ical ,ers%ecti9e on "ea%ons o- 0ass 1estructionC 6tt%=//&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/co6nru33ick.%3-) ,A 7nti5&ar 6eminists- o//osition to the /ractice o6 0ar is simultaneousl) /ragmatic an9 moral . ,e ha>e an abi9ing sus/icion o6 the use o6 >iolenceD e>en in the best o6 causes . 46e a8ility o- 9iolence to ac6ie9e its state3 aims is routinely o9er5estimate3C &6ile t6e com%leDity o- its costs are o9erlooke3. 4ur o//osition also stems 6rom the /erce/tion that t6e %ractice o- 0ar entails -ar more than t6e 'illing an9 9estro)ing o- arme3 com8at itsel-. It reHuires the creation o6 a G0ar s)stemDF 0hich entails@ armingD trainingD an9 organizing 6or /ossible 0arsI allocating the resources these /re/arations reHuireI creating a culture in 0hich 0ars are seen as morall) legitimateC e9en allurin/J an3 sha/ing an9 6ostering the masculinities an9 6emininities 0hich un9ergir9 men-s an9 0omen-s acHuiescence to 0ar . $9en &6en it a%%ears to ac6ie9e its aimsC &ar is a source o- enormous in3i9i3ual su--erin/ an3 loss. 0o3ern 0ar6are is also /re9ictabl) 9estructi>e to societiesD ci>il liberties an9 9emocratic /rocessesD an9 the non;human 0orl9. State securit) ma) sometimes be ser>e9 b) 0arD but too o6ten human securit) is not
&in' ( Realism/Securit)
Realist assum/tions are 6un9amentall) s'e0e9 ( the) ignore the structural im/lications 0ithin nations an9 in>o'e e/istemic >iolence <)otte an9 7usain 1 (<e9in AC 7ssistant ,ro-essor in t6e 1e%artment o- Communication at t6e Cali-ornia State
ni9ersity an3 0ary $C lecturer in t6e 1e%artment o- Communication at t6e Cali-ornia State ni9ersityC ESecurin/ 7-/6an "omen= NeocolonialismC $%istemic LiolenceC an3 t6e R6etoric o- t6e LeilC %. 1125113) ,A :he conce/t o6 Gsecurit)F has not al0a)s been consi9ere9 %articularly /roblematic in t6e stu3y ointernational relations. ;or muc6 o- t6e t&entiet6 centuryC an3 to a si/ni-i cant 3e/ree to3ayC muc6 o- t6e t6eory an3 %ractice o- international relations 6as 8een con3ucte3 -rom &it6in t6e %ers%ecti9e o- %olitical realismC realpolitikC or its 3eri9ati9eC neorealism (1esc6 199(C 3(1J LasIueB 19+3C 1(0)2). ,ithin the realist /ara9igmD securit) -lo0s 6rom /o0erD s/eci6i call) state /o0er an9 militar) strength. Recent 6eminist scholarshi/ has challenge9 this notion o6 securit) on the groun9s that 0omen ha>e ne>er been secure r 0ithin (or &it6out) the nation stateKthe) are al0a)s 9is/ro/ortionatel) a66ecte9 b) 0arD 6orce9 migrationD 6amineD an9 other 6orms o6 socialD /oliticalD an9 economic turmoil (0o6anty 2002C '1!J 4ickner 2001C '01). :he statist theoretical 6rame0or' o6 /olitical realism is t6us ina9eHuate to eE/lain the myria3 con9itions that ma'e 0omen insecure in t6e &orl3 to3ay. In t6e &ake o- t6e E0ar on terrorismF an9 its mobilization o6 0omen-s bo9ies to ?usti6) *.S. militar) inter>ention in <6ghanistanD 6eminist anal)ses o6 international relations must broa9en the conce/t o6 securit)D in A. 7nn 4ickner#s &or3sC to Eseek to un3erstan3 6o& t6e security o- in3i9i3uals an3 /rou%s is com%romise3 8y 9iolenceC 8ot6 %6ysical an3 structuralF (2001C !+). 4o t6e ty%es o- 9iolence eDamine3 8y -eminist international relations sc6olars6i%C &e &oul3 a33 t6e conce%t o- epistemic violence (see S%i9ak 1999C 2((#. ,hile the /h)sical an9 structural >iolence in6l icte9 u/on 0omen must remain a central com/onent o6 6eminist theor) an9 criticismD the 0ar on terrorism in 7-/6anistan also 9emonstrates that the ,estern a//ro/riation an9 homogenization o6 thir9;0orl9 0omen-s >oices /er6orm a 'in9 o6 e/istemic >iolence that must be a99resse9 along 0ith material o//ressions.1 46is essay ar/ues t6at re/resentations o6 the 0omen o6 <6ghanistan as gen9ere9 sla>es in nee9 o6 Gsa>ingF b) the ,est constitute e/istemic >iolenceD the construction o6 a >iolent 'no0le9ge o6 the thir90orl9 4ther t6at erases &omen as subjects in international relations. In claimin/ to secure 7-/6an &omen -rom t6e o%%ression o- t6e 4ali8anC t6e nite3 States 6as reinscri8e3 an ostensi8ly 8ene9olent %aternalism o- &6ic6 &e s6oul3 remain &ary. In %articularC t6e ima/e o- t6e 7-/6an &oman s6rou3e3 in t6e 8urIa 6as %laye3 a lea3in/ role in 9arious %u8lic ar/uments seekin/ to :usti-y .S. military inter9ention in 7-/6anistan -ollo&in/ t6e 9/11 attacks. :his rhetorical construction o6 <6ghan 0omen as ob?ects o6 'no0le9ge legitimize9 *.S. militar) inter>ention un9er the rubric o6 GliberationF at the same time that it mas'e9 the root causes o6 structural >iolence in <6ghanistan. 46e %ursuit o- /en3er security must t6ere-ore account -or t6e 3i9erse &ays in &6ic6 t6e neocolonialism o- some "estern 3iscourses a8out t6ir35&orl3 &omen creates t6e e%istemolo/ical con3itions -or material 6arm. 7lt6ou/6 t6e 3istinctions amon/ e%istemicC %6ysicalC an3 structural 9iolence in t6is article allo& -or analytic %recision in t6e sense t6at t6ese -orms o- 9iolence are in3ee3 3i--erent in kin3C &e must reco/niBe t6eir com%licitous relations6i%.
&in' ( Realism/Securit)
Realist assum/tions an9 the securit) /ara9igm can-t sol>e structural /roblems an9 ignore constant structural >iolence. Pan9e) in 2'2 (7nu%amC t6esis su8mitte3 to -aculty o- /ra3uate stu3ies an3 researc6 in %artial -ul-illment o- t6e
reIuirements -or t6e 3e/ree o- 3octorate o- %6iloso%6y 3e%artment o- %olitical science Carleton uni9ersityC ;or/in/ 8on3s &it6 &omenC nature an3 t6e t6ir3 &orl3= an eco-eminist critiIue o- international relationsC %/. 1)51+) 1es%ite t6e -act t6at many si/ni-icant critiIues 6a9e ma3e t6eir %resence -eltC the 9isci/line o6 IR continues to be 9ominate9 b) the sub;6iel9 o6 militar) securit). :he c6ie- reason -or t6e same is t6e %re%on3erance o- the Realist /ara9igm 0hich nee9s to be situate9 0ithin the circumstances o6 the historical legac) an9 birth o6 IRD t6e Col3 "arC the emergence o6 a single hegemon /ost;!ol9 ,arD the rene0e9 threat o6 terrorismD etc. 46usC conce/ts o6 balance o6 /o0erD 9eterrenceD so>ereignt)D etc. ha>e come to occu/) the central an9 >ast ma?orit) o6 s/ace in the sub?ect matter o6 the 9isci/line. >ot6 t6eory an3 %ractice 6a9e ser9e3 to rein-orce eac6 ot6er an3 t6is %artners6i% 6as ser9e3 to mar/inaliBe all ot6er issues &6ic6 are re/ar3e3 as Enormati9eF concerns to t6e mar/ins o- t6e IR. 46usC issues such as :hir9 ,orl9 9ebt an9 /o>ert) are relegate9 to the realm o6 Glo0 /oliticsF an9 hence /ut on the bac'burnerD 0hile matters /ertaining to state securit)D 0arsD 0ea/onisation an9 so>ereignt) are stu9ie9 as an integral /art o6 the Ghigh /oliticsF 0hich 9eser>e salience. .o&e9erC the more recent inno>ation o6 human securit) stu9ies is rele>ant to the :hir9 ,orl9 b) sheer 9int o6 its sub?ect matter 0hich eE/lores human >ulnerabilit) across the globe that coul9 be the result o6 natural or man;ma9e 9isasters . Simon 1al8y states t6at tra3itionally t6ere 6a9e 8een t&o elements to 6uman security M -ree3om -rom -ear an3 -ree3om -rom &ant 8ut o9er t6e yearsC t6e -ormer element 6as o9ers6a3o&e3 t6e latter (2002= )). ;urt6erC 6e Iuotes t6e N1, .uman 1e9elo%ment Re%ort (199!) to 3e-ine 6uman security. 46usC issues o6 /o>ert)D 9iseaseD hungerD 6aminesD 6inancial crises 6eature /rominentl) here un9er the o>erarching to/ics o6 6ree9om 6rom 0ant an9 hunger (46omas an3 "ilkins 200!). In t6e comin/ centuryD the siE great threats to human securit) are unchec'e9 rise in /o/ulationD 9is/arities in economic o//ortunitiesD eEcessi>e international migrationD en>ironmental 9egra9ationD 9rug tra66ic'ing an9 international terrorism (1al8y 2002= +#. It becomes clear that these threats are the result o6 actions o6 millions o6 /eo/le rather than 9eliberate actions o6 s/eci6ic states. 46ere-oreC the conce/t o6 securit) must change 6rom the realistD statist an9 militarist /reoccu/ations to inclu9e human 0el6are . 1es%ite t6e -act t6at t6e a%%roac6 is 6olistic in its un3erstan3in/ o- &orl3 a--airs an3 emanci%atory in terms o- its a/en3aC its 3ra&8ack lies in t6at it lar/ely es%ouses a li8eral 6umanitarian -rame&ork rat6er t6an a ra3ical 3e%arture -rom eDistin/ structural constraints
&in' ( *tilitarianism
tilitarianism re5%er%etuates %atriarc6al 6ierarc6ies 8y esta8lis6in/ a rationale o- &6o &ill an3 &on#t sur9i9e. Plum0oo9 2 (LalC 7ustralian Researc6 Council ;ello& at ni9ersity o- Sy3neyC $n9ironmental Culture= 46e
ecolo/ical crisis o- reasonC %. 1'051'1) ,A Sin/erNs 0inimalism is also a %olitical %osition ur/in/ minimal 3e%arture -rom %re9ailin/ li8eralC 6umanistic an3 $nli/6tenment assum%tions an3 -rom t6e %resent system o- economic rationality.KK >ut surely an ecolo/ical society &ill reIuire more t6an minimal 3e%artures -rom t6ese systemsC none o- &6ic6 6a9e 8een innocent 8ystan3ers in t6e 3e9elo%ment o- t6e rational mac6inery &6ic6 is 8rin/in/ t6e stri%%in/ o- t6e %lanet -or t6e 8ene-it o- a small elite o- 6umans to a 6i/6 %oint o- rational re-inement. Sin/erNs *tilitarianism re/ro9uces man) elements o6 rationalismD inclu9ing the a9o/tion o6 uni>ersalD abstract mathematicall);eE/ressible 6ormulae 6or 9ecisionD in the best uni>ersalist/Im/ersonalist tra9ition . 7lso in t6e rationalist tra9ition is the content o6 the *tilitarian 6ormulaD 0ith its maEimisations (al&ays 3ama/in/)C illusor) /recisionD its intellectualist re9uction o6 ethics to a matter o6 rational calculation an9 Huanti6icationD an9 its corres/on9ing re9uction o6 the im/ortant 9imensions o6 9ecision to as/ects o6 li6e su//ose9l) susce/tible to these rational mani/ulations. 7n3 as &e 6a9e seenC a&arenessC t6e c6ie- /roun3 o- et6ical consi3erationC is oneC 8ut only oneC %ossi8le 9ariation on reason or min3C alt6ou/6 one t6at mo3ernism can tie to %re-erences an3 6ence to a/ency an3 %ro%erty o&ners6i%. 46e most serious o8:ection to my min3 6o&e9er is t6at any ecolo/ical or animal et6ics 8ase3 on Sin/erNs *tilitarianism is committe9 to a massi>e /rogram o6 ran'ingD Huanti6ication an9 com/arison bet0een beings an9 s/ecies 5 a %ro/ram 0hichC as I ar/ue in t6e neDt c6a%terC is un0or'ableD ethicall) re/ugnantD an9 built on a /roblematic rea9ing o6 eHualit). 46eoreticallyC rankin/ com%arisons an3 tra3eo--s 8et&een 8ein/s are insiste3 u%on 8y tilitarianism at 9irtually e9ery le9el. 46is em%6asis on rankin/ 3oes not encoura/e t6e kin3 o- t6inkin/ t6at aims -or mutualC ne/otiate3 outcomesC 8ut rat6er ones t6at sanction a sacri-icial or3er 3etermine3 on t6e 8asis o- /reater a%%roDimations to t6e 6uman.
Aenign rhetoric an9 0omen-s em/o0erment is use9 to ?usti6) im/erialist measures. <)otte an9 7usain 1 (<e9in AC 7ssistant ,ro-essor in t6e 1e%artment o- Communication at t6e Cali-ornia State
ni9ersity an3 0ary $C lecturer in t6e 1e%artment o- Communication at t6e Cali-ornia State ni9ersityC ESecurin/ 7-/6an "omen= NeocolonialismC $%istemic LiolenceC an3 t6e R6etoric o- t6e LeilC %. 11'511() ,A 46ere seems to 8e consi3era8le a/reement t6at the burHaC t6e 6ea9y /arment t6at co9ers t6e entirety o- a &oman#s 8o3y &it6 only a narro& mes6 screen -or 9isionC has become the uni>ersal s)mbol o6 0omen-s o//ression in <6ghanistan (<ensin/er 2003C 2J 78u5Lu/6o3 2002C )+'). In t6e conteDt o- t6e 4ali8an#s 6ars6 im%osition o- t6e man3atory 8urIa -or all 7-/6an &omenC &6ere t6e smallest 3e9iation in 3ress &as o-ten met &it6 %u8lic 9iolenceC suc6 sym8olism is easy to un3erstan3. It 6as 8een &ell 3ocumente3 t6at &omen in 7-/6anistan 6a9e 8een 8eaten sim%ly -or acci3entally lettin/ an inc6 o- skin s6o& ( nite3 Nations 2000C )J 7mnesty International 1999J ,6ysicians -or .uman Ri/6ts 199+C '2). *- courseC t6e 4ali8an#s o9er&6elmin/ miso/yny neit6er 8e/an nor en3e3 &it6 t6e im%osition o- t6e 8urIaC an3 t6e &i3e ran/e oo%%ressi9e %olicies t6at t6e 4ali8an in-licte3 u%on &omen 6as certainly 8een 3iscusse3 in t6e .S. ne&s me3ia. Oet in many casesD re/resentations o6 the burHa ha>e come to stan9 in 6or all o6 the other >iolence 9one to <6ghan 0omen b) an either >isual or linguistic s)nec9oche. It is not onl) the rhetoric o6 Gthe >eilF that is signi6icant in *.S. 9iscourses about <6ghan 0omen but also the /osition o6 the s/ea'ing sub?ect.3 $s%ecially %ro8lematic is t6e 9entriloIuism o- 7-/6an &omen 8y 3iscourses s%eakin/ -or (8ot6 Eon 8e6al- o-F an3 Ein %lace o-F) t6em. ;or eDam%leC Licki 0a8rey re%orte3 on C>S#s 60 Minutes II t6atC E-or t6e &omen o- 7-/6anistanC t6e 9eilC t6e 8urIaC 6as 8ecome t6e sym8ol o- t6e 4ali8an#s %o&erF (E n9eile3F 2001). *- courseC in one sense t6is may 9ery &ell 8e %er-ectly accurateC an3 t6e %oint oi3enti-yin/ t6is moment is not to su//est t6at .S. &omen (or men) s6oul3 not s%eak o- ot6er %eo%les# o%%ression. :he 'e) is to maintain a constantl) re6leEi>e s'e/ticism to0ar9 the a9eHuac) o6 our o0n ( .S.) re/resentations o6 the G/lightF o6 thir9;0orl9 0omen. 7lt6ou/6 0a8rey 3oes inter9ie& &omen -rom 7-/6anistanC &e must recall t6at E.umaCF ESoniaCF an3 t6e ot6ers inter9ie&e3 in t6e ne&s %ro/ram are al&ays alrea3y 9entriloIuiBe3 8y t6e me3ia narrati9e. .>en i6 their accounts coul9 be un/roblematicall) inter/rete9 as imme9iate an9 generalizable re6lections o6 realit)D that 9iscourse has alrea9) been e9ite9D /rom/te9 b) certain lines o6 HuestioningD i.e.D me9iate9. :his is not to suggest that the 0omen-s stories are 6alseD but rather that e>en their in9igenous narrati>es are in6lecte9 b) their re/resentation in an ine>itabl) ,estern 9iscourse (S%i9ak 1999C !9).
&in' ( ,ar/Securit)
:he a66 treats 0ar as an account o6 societ) instea9 o6 a /racticeD 0hich eEclu9es it 6rom true criticism ,or'man $2 (46omC ,oli Sci S o- Ne& >runs&ickC OCISS ,a%er no. 31C %. 3C Aanuary 199(C
6tt%=//&&&.yorku.ca/yciss/%u8lications/*,315"orkman.%3-)I0
*- courseC t6e -act t6at t&o lo/ically 3istinct lines o- IueryMt6e -ailure to reco/niBe similarities an3 t6e eDaltation o- a su8:ect matterM are 8oun3 to/et6er antici%ates one com%ellin/ res%onse. 46e 3isci%line t6at claime3 the stu9) o6 0ar as its o&n in t6e a-termat6 o- "orl3 "ar IC t6at isC international relationsD ecli/se9 critiHues that 0ere incline9 to locate 0ar 0ithin a broa9er eE/lanator) matriE. S/eci6icall)D the 6eminist an3 0arDist critiHues o6 0ar 0ere eEclu9e9 in t6e initial -lurry o- intellectual K6omestea3in/K t6at Iuickly came to 3e-ine t6e inci%ient -iel3.3 ;eminist critiIues t6at a33resse3 "orl3 "ar I in terms o- %atriarc6al culture an3 society &ere circulate3 t6rou/6out t6e &ar.! SimilarlyC ar/uments a8out t6e ori/ins o- "orl3 "ar I t6at -ocusse3 u%on t6e nature an3 3ynamics o- /lo8aliBin/ ca%italism &ere %resent -rom t6e 8e/innin/.' It is curious t6at a -iel3 &it6 t6e raison 3Netre o- eD%lainin/ &ar &oul3 cast t&o so8erin/ lines o- inIuiry asi3e at its %oint o- ince%tion. "6en 9ie&e3 in t6is mannerC the inaugural /hase o6 intellectual acti>it) in international relations C a %6ase t6at 6as 8een 3escri8e3 recently as neo5<antian in 9ie& o- its %enc6ant -or 3emocratic re%u8licanism an3 its -ocus u%on t6e coo%erati9e %ros%ects o- so9erei/n statesC a//ears as a 9iscursi>e /ractice aime9 at 6oreclosing ra9ical critiHues o6 0ar .( ;rom t6e outsetC in ot6er &or3sC t6e t6eoretical un3erstan3in/ o- international relations &as %ro-oun3ly %olitical in terms o- its consonance &it6 t6e re%ro3uction o- %atri5ca%italism. 46e t6eory5t6at58ecame5%raDis crystalliBe3 &it6in an early 20t6 century 3iscursi9e matriD t6at mar/inaliBe3 -eminist an3 0arDist critiIueC an3 &it6 it any %ossi8ility o- a33ressin/ &ar as a 6istorically em8e33e3 social %ractice. :he ten9enc) to rei6) 0arD t6at isC to 6ail to eEamine it as /art o6 a broa9er set o6 cultural un3erstan3in/s an3 %racticesC 0as intensi6ie9 9uring the %ositi9ist /all o6 international relations. :he imme9iate tas' at 6an3 became the a//lication o6 a naturalist mo3el o- science in t6e Iuest -or nomolo/ical t6eories o- &ar. Sc6olars coul3 a%%ly t6is theoretical 'no0le9ge to the 0orl9 Jout thereK in or3er to %romote an3 6oster a more /eace6ul 0orl9. K46e cause o- t6e 3isease once kno&nCK %resciently muse3 Aean5AacIues Rousseau in t6e 78stract o- t6e 788T 3e Saint5,ierreNs ,ro:ect -or ,er%etual ,eace in a manner t6at antici%ate3 t6e s%irit o- researc6ers t6rou/6out muc6 o- t6e 20t6 centuryC Ksu--ices to in3icate t6e reme3yC iin3ee3 t6ere is one to 8e -oun3.K :he >ie0 that 0ar might 8e relate3 to %atriarc6yC in3ee3C t6at it mi/6t be roote9 in /atriarchal cultureC or t6e %ossi8ility that 0ar might be un9erstoo9 better as one mani6estation o6 >iolence characteristic o6 a gen9ere9 societ)D 0as absent 6rom almost all research . Nor &as t6e 3e9elo%in/ -eminist critiIue 3eeme3 to 8e all t6at rele9ant or 6el%-ul in un3erstan3in/ &ar.) ,ar 0as treate9 as a thing in nee9 o6 an
&in' ( 4mission
:he a66irmati>e-s 6ailure to a99ress the inherent masculinities an9 securit) /ara9igms in contem/orar) nuclear states ma'e their im/acts ine>itable ( the alternati>e is the best o/tion. !ohn an9 Ru99ic' % (CarolC Researc6er an3 4eac6er at .ar9ar3 0e3ical Si/nsC an3 SaraC aut6orC 7 ;eminist
$t6ical ,ers%ecti9e on "ea%ons o- 0ass 1estructionC 6tt%=//&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/co6nru33ick.%3-) ,A Muestion :hree as's &6et6er it is et6ical to 3e9elo% an3 3e%loy "01 as 3eterrents only. 46at isC it asks t6e classic Iuestion o- 0hether it is ethical to ha>e 0ea/ons an9 threaten to use thenD e>en i6 it is not ethical to use those 0ea/ons militaril). 7s t6e Iuestion is -rame3C t6enC E3e9elo%mentF an3 E3e%loymentF a%%ear not as %6enomena su8:ect to et6ical scrutiny unto t6emsel9esC 8ut merely as &ay5stationsC as a3:uncts su8sume3 un3er &6at is taken to 8e t6e core et6ical issueC &6ic6 is seen as 9eterrence. 46is -ormulation 9oes not 0or' 6or us. "e nee3 to %ause an3 reco/niBe t6at t6ere are really se9eral Iuestions en-ol3e3 in t6at one. ,e must not onl) as' about the ethical status o6 9eterrenceD but also 0hether its entailments 9e>elo/ment an9 9e/lo)ment ( are t6emsel9es ethical.2) *ne o- t6e constituti9e %ositions o- anti5&ar -eminism is t6at in t6inkin/ a8out &ea%ons an3 &arsC &e must accor3 -ull &ei/6t to t6eir 3aily e--ects on t6e li9es o- &omen. "e t6en -in3 t6at t6e 3e9elo%ment an3 3e%loyment o- nuclear &ea%onsC e9en &6en t6ey are not use3 in &ar-areC eDacts immense economic costs t6at %articularly a--ect &omen. In t6e &or3s o- a recent In3ian -eminist essay= G:he social costs o6 nuclear 0ea/onisation in a countr) 0here the basic nee9s o6 shelterD 6oo9 an9 0aterD electricit)D health an9 e9ucation ha>e not been met are ob>ious.... NSOince /atriarchal 6amil) norms /lace the tas' o6 loo'ing a6ter the 9ail) nee9s o6 the 6amil) mainl) u/on 0omenD scarcit) o6 resources al0a)s hits 0omen the har9est. Less -oo3 -or t6e -amily ine9ita8ly means an e9en smaller s6are -or &omen an3 -emale c6il3ren :ust as &ater s6orta/es mean an increase in &omen#s la8our &6o 6a9e to s%en3 more time an3 ener/y in -etc6in/ &ater -rom 3istant %laces at o33 6ours o- t6e 3ay.F2+ ,hile the *S is not as /oor a nation as In9iaD Pa'istanD or RussiaC it has remaine9C t6rou/6out t6e nuclear a/eC a countr) in 0hich /o>ert) an9 hunger are ri6eC 6ealt6 care still una--or3a8le to manyC lo&5cost 6ousin/ una9aila8leC &it6 crum8lin/ %u8lic sc6ools an3 in-rastructure D all 0hile the <merican nuclear 0ea/ons /rogram has come at the cost o6 +.1 trillion 9ollars.29 In a33ition to 8ein/ economically costlyC nuclear &ea%ons 3e9elo%ment 6as me3ical an3 %olitical costs. In t6e S %ro/ramC many %eo%le 6a9e 8een eD%ose3 to 6i/6 le9els o- ra3iationC inclu3in/ uranium minersJ &orkers at reactors an3 %rocessin/ -acilitiesJ t6e Iuarter o- a million military %ersonnel &6o took %lace in Eatomic 8attle-iel3F eDercisesJ E3o&n&in3ersF -rom test sitesJ an3 0ars6allese Islan3ers. 30 ,oliticallyC nuclear re/imes reIuire a le9el osecrecy an3 security measures t6at eDclu3e t6e ma:ority o- citiBensC an3 in most countriesC all &omenC -rom 3e-ense %olicy an3 3ecision5makin/.F31 From the /ers/ecti>e o6 0omen-s li>esD 0e see not onl) the costs o6 the 9e>elo/ment o6 nuclear 0ea/onsD but also the s/iritualD social an9 /s)chological costs o6 9e/lo)ment. *ne costC accor3in/ to some -eministsC is t6at ENuclearisation %ro3uces social consent -or increasin/ le9els o- 9iolence.32 7not6er costC -or manyC is t6at nuclear &ea%ons create 6i/6 le9els o- tensionC insecurity an3 -ear. 7s 7run36ati Roy %uts itC nuclear &ea%ons EGiHn-orm our 3reams. 46ey 8ury t6emsel9es like meat 6ooks 3ee% in t6e 8ase o- our 8rains.F33 ;urt6erC 6eminists are concerne9 about the e66ect o6 nuclear /olic) on moral thoughtD on i9eas about gen9erD an9 ho0 the t0o intersect. uclear 9e>elo/ment may legitimize male aggressionD an9 bree9 the i9ea that nuclear eE/losions gi>e a P>irilit)to the nation 0hich men as in9i>i9uals can someho0 also share . G4H6e stran/e c6aracter o- nuclear %olicy5 makin/ not only si3elines moral an3 et6ical IuestionsC 8ut /en3ers t6em. 46is elite /ets to 8e re%resente3 as rationalC scienti-icC mo3ernC an3 o- course masculineC &6ile et6ical IuestionsC Iuestions a8out t6e social an3 en9ironmental costs are ma3e to seem emotionalC e--eminateC re/ressi9e an3 not mo3ern. :his rather 9angerous 0a) o6 thin'ingC &6ic6 su//ests t6at Iuestions a8out 6uman li-e an3 &el-are are some6o& neit6er mo3ern nor %ro%erly masculine IuestionsC or t6at men 6a9e no ca%acity an3 concern -or %eace an3 moralityC can ha>e 9isastrous conseHuences 6or both men an9 0omen.3!
&in' ( 4mission
:he a66irmati>e-s scenarios subscribe to the tra9itional >alues o6 International Relations in that the) omit the in9i>i9ual su66erings an9 eE/eriences o6 a66ecte9 0omen. S?oberg 3 (LauraC ,61 an3 9istin/ %ro-essor at 1uke ni9ersityC 2/13C
6tt%=//&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/LauraP20S:o8er/P205P202Q13Q0).%3-) :he search 6or 6eminist 'no0le9ge can be seen as a ?ourne) to un9erstan9 an9 change the 0orl9 through Ggen9ere9 lenses.F In -eminist researc6C I am lookin/ to un3erstan3 international %oliticsC to -in3 its in:usticesC an3 to c6allen/e t6ose in:usticesC &6ile reco/niBin/ a %luralism concernin/ t6e 3e-inition an3 a%%raisal o- in:ustice. 7s 7nn 4ickner %oints outC this ma'es 6eminist metho9 not an e9entC 8ut a ?ourne) a :ourney t6at I take through obser>ationD critiHueD re>ealingD re6ormulationD re6leEi>it)D an9 actionD gui9e9 b) gen9ere9 lenses. "e &ill start &it6 in3i9i3ual /en3er. ;eminists in IR -reIuently /o out o- t6eir &ay to look for women in /lo8al %olitics. ,omen are necessaril) a /art o6 global /olitics@ the) ma'e u/ more than hal6 the 0orl9-s /o/ulation an9 are locate9 e>er)0here that men are. QetD the stories o6 global /olitics o6ten 9o not mention the 0omen 0hose li>es a66ect an9 are a66ecte9 b) international relations. 46e 6istories or IraIC IranC <u&aitC an3 Israel are contentious. ,olitical con9ictions in-luence t6e stories t6at %eo%le tell o- 0i33le $ast relations since t6e en3 o- t6e ;irst "orl3 "ar. Some s/ea' o6 Israel-s 6ight to sur>i>e in a region that threatens to re/licate the 7olocaust. 4thers recount the o//ression o6 the <rab 8i99le .ast b) rich an9 /o0er6ul outsi9ersD in Israel an9 abroa9. :hese stories 6rom 9i>erse /olitical /ers/ecti>es /erha/s share nothing but their ten9enc) to omit 0omen . "omen are lar/ely omitte3 -rom t6e 6istories o- t6e ;irst 2ul- "ar. ,here 0omen are mentione9D it is normall) in the conteEt o- eit6er t6eir nee3 -or %rotection or a 6uman interest story on t6e o33ity o- &omen in %artici%atory roles. 46e stories o- &omen t6at &ere tol3 in t6e ;irst 2ul- "ar (&6en t6ey &ere tol3 at all) &ere o- innocent &omen in nee3 o- %rotection or -eminine emulation o- masculine military 9alues. :elling the stories that remain untol9 in tra9itional histories is one o6 6eminisms- strongest tools. Feminisms loo' to /olitics at the margins to 6in9 0omen ; to see realities about their li>esD their actionsD an9 their su66ering. S/ea'ing about 0omen-s li>es ma'es it more 9i66icult to ignore them.
&in' ( Proli6eration
Rhetoric o6 /roli6eration is /art o6 the securit) /ara9igm that ?usti6ies masculine >iolence on those /ercei>e9 as threats. !ohn an9 Ru99ic' % (CarolC Researc6er an3 4eac6er at .ar9ar3 0e3ical Si/nsC an3 SaraC aut6orC 7 ;eminist
$t6ical ,ers%ecti9e on "ea%ons o- 0ass 1estructionC 6tt%=//&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/co6nru33ick.%3-) ,A GProli6erationF is not a mere 9escri/tion or mirror o6 a /henomenon that is Gout thereDF but rather a >er) s/eci6ic 0a) o6 i9enti6)ing an9 constructing a /roblem. GProli6eration C F as use3 in "estern %olitical 3iscourseC 3oes not sim%ly re-er to t6e Emulti%licationF o- &ea%ons o- mass 3estruction on t6e %lanet. Rat6erC it constructs some "01 as a /roblemC an3 ot6ers as un%ro8lematic. It 9oes so b) assuming /re;eEistingD legitimate /ossessors o6 the 0ea/onsD im/licitl) not onl) entitle9 to those 0ea/onsD but to Gmo9ernizeF an9 9e>elo/ ne0 GgenerationsF o6 them as 0ell. 46e E%ro8lematicF "01 are only t6ose t6at Es%rea3F into t6e arsenals o- ot6erC -ormerly non5%ossessor states. 46is is %resuma8ly t6e 8asis -or t6e Elicit/illicitF 3istinction in t6e IuestionJ it 3oes not re-er to t6e nature o- t6e &ea%ons t6emsel9esC nor e9en to t6e %ur%oses -or &6ic6 t6ey are inten3e3 onlyC in t6e case o- nuclear &ea%onsC to &6o t6e %ossessor isC &6ere ElicitnessF is 8ase3 on t6e treaty5ens6rine3 E&e /ot t6ere -irst.F 46usC use o- the term G/roli6erationF ten9s to locate the /erson 0ho uses it 0ithin a /ossessor stateD an9 aligns him or her 0ith the /olitical stance 6a>oring the hierarch) o6 state /o0er enshrine9 in the current 9istribution o6 ,8D . 46e -ramin/ o- Uuestion ;our. E... is it %ro%er to 3eny G"01H %ossession to ot6ers -or t6e same %ur%osesVFC seems similarly 8ase3 in a %ossessor state %ers%ecti9eC as it is %resuma8ly t6e %ossessor states &6o must 3eci3e &6et6er it is %ro%er to 3eny %ossession to ot6ers. 7s &e 6a9e alrea3y state3C &e -in3 "01 t6emsel9es intrinsically morally in3e-ensi8leC no matter &6o %ossesses t6emC an3 &e are concerne3 a8out t6e &i3e array o- costs to any state o- 3e9elo%ment an3 3e%loyment. "e t6ere-ore re:ect t6e 3iscourse#s im%licit 3i9ision o- E/oo3F an3 E8a3CF Esa-eF an3 Eunsa-eF "01C (3e-ine3 as /oo3 or 8a3 3e%en3in/ on &6o %ossesses t6em). *ur concern is to un3erstan3 6o& some "01 are ren3ere3 in9isi8le (Eo ursF) an3 some 9isi8le (Et6eirsF)J some ren3ere3 mali/nant an3 ot6ers 8eni/n. .ereC &e :oin ot6ers in notin/ t6at t6e lan/ua/e in &6ic6 t6e case a/ainst E%roli-erationF is ma3e is et6no5racist an3 contem%tuous. 2enerallyC in "estern %roli-eration 3iscourse as a &6oleC a 3istinction is 3ra&n 8et&een Et6e RSel-#(seen as res%onsi8le) 9s t6e non5"estern nruly *t6er.F3( :he *S re/resents itsel6 as a rational actorD 0hile re/resenting the *nrul) 4ther as emotionalD un/re9ictableD irrationalD immatureD misbeha>ing. ot onl) 9oes this 9ra0 on an9 reconstruct an 4rientalist /ortra)al o6 thir9 0orl9 actors 3)J it 9oes so through the me9ium o6 gen9ere9 terminolog). >y 3ra&in/ t6e relations 8et&een %ossessors an3 non5%ossessors in /en3ere3 terms t6e %ru3entialC rationalC a39ance3C matureC restraine3C tec6nolo/ically5 an3 8ureaucratically5 com%etent (an3 t6us EmasculineF) Sel-C 9ersus t6e emotionalC irrationalC un%re3icta8leC uncontrolle3C immatureC %rimiti9eC un3isci%line3C tec6nolo/ically5incom%etent (an3 t6us E-eminineF) nruly *t6er t6e 3iscourse naturaliBes an3 le/itimates t6e Sel-/%ossessor states 6a9in/ &ea%ons &6ic6 t6e *t6er 3oes not. >y 3ra&in/ on an3 e9okin/ /en3ere3 ima/ery an3 resonancesC t6e 3iscourse naturaliBes t6e i3ea t6at E"eF / t6e S / t6e res%onsi8le -at6er must %rotectC must control an3 limit E6erCF t6e emotionalC out5o-5control stateC -or 6er o&n /oo3C as &ell as -or ours. :his ,estern /roli6eration 9iscourse has ha9 a 6unction in the 0i9er conteEt o6 *S national securit) /olitics. ,ith the en9 o6 the G.>il .m/ireF in the late 1$50sD until the attac's o6 Se/tember 11thD 2001D the *S a//eare9 to be 0ithout an enem) o6 gran9 enough /ro/ortions to ?usti6) maintaining its s/ra0ling militar); in9ustrial establishment. 46is 3i--iculty &as -orestalle3 8y t6e construction o- t6e cate/ory o- Erogue statesF states seen as uncontrolla8leC irres%onsi8leC irrationalC male9olentC an3 anta/onistic to t6e "est.3+ 46eir unruliness an9 antagonism 0as re/resente9 as intrinsic to their irrational natureI i6 it 0ere not in their GnatureD the *S 0oul9 ha>e nee9e9 to as' more seriousl) i6 actions on the /art o6 the ,est ha9 ha9 an) role in /ro9ucing that hostilit) an9 9isor9er. :he 9iscourse o6 ,8D /roli6eration has been one o6 the /rinci/al means o6 /ro9ucing these states as ma?or threats. 4o say t6is is neit6er to 8ack a&ay -rom our %osition o%%osin/ &ea%ons o- mass 3estructionC nor to assess t6e 3e/ree to &6ic6 "01 in t6e 6an3s o- E*t6erF states actually 3o t6reaten t6e SC t6e E*t6erF states# re/ional o%%onentsC or t6eir o&n %o%ulation. >ut it is an assessment o- t6e role o- "01 %roli-eration 3iscourse in naturaliBin/ an3 le/itimatin/ ot6er&ise53i--icult5to5make5a%%ear5rational %ro/rams an3 eD%en3itures suc6 as National 0issile 1e-ense. 39
&in' ( 7egemon)/8ilitarism/7umanitarianism
:he militar) /uts on a 6aca9e o6 /ossible liberation 6rom seEism 0hile 0aging 0ar on the 0omenD the en>ironmentD an9 culture. !hou9r) 5 (7BiBC %ro-essor at 0c2ill ni9ersityC 6tt%=//&&&./oo/le.com/searc6VI?7BiBWC6ou3ryXie?ut-5
+Xoe?ut-5+XaI?tXrls?or/.moBilla=en5 S=o--icialXclient?-ire-oD5a) ,A :he bur9en o6 0arD con6lictD >iolence an9 militarize9 ca/italism 6alls 9is/ro/ortionatel) on 0omen. :he im/acts o6 0omen can be seen not onl) in con6lict zones but through the /roli6eration o6 small arms an9 cree/ing militarization o6 communities an9 societ) at largeD lea9ing to more >iolence against 0omen in 9omestic an9 communit) conteEtsD ra/esD seEual >iolenceD 9is/lacement an9 the eEaltation o6 0arrior masculinities. "omen are more likely to 8ecome &ar re-u/ees. nsur%risin/ly t6enC it 6as also 8een &omen &6o 6a9e le3 resistance a/ainst militariBationC &ar an3 9iolenceC *S militar) bases an9 the accom/an)ing masculinization o6 broa9er societ) an9 social beha>iour. It is usually &omen &6o %ick u% t6e %ieces in communities ri%%e3 a%art 8y &arC 9iolence an3 state re%ression. Cynt6ia $nloe notes t6at social &orkers &6o a33ress issues o- 3omestic 9iolence Ea/ree t6at military ser9ice is %ro8a8ly more con3uci9e to 9iolence at 6ome t6an at any ot6er occu%ationF.!3 0ean&6ileC 0e are sub?ecte9 to constant claims that a /rimar) goal o6 the *S;le9 in>asion an9 occu/ation o6 <6ghanistan is to liberate <6ghani 0omen . Commentin/ on t6isC Sunera 46o8ani notesC Eone 8attle in t6e i3eolo/ical &ar &as to 8e &a/e3 on t6e terrain o- /en3er relationsC Y rall)ing 0estern /o/ulations aroun9 6antasies o6 sa>ing 8uslim 0omen 0oul9 be more e66ecti>e than rall)ing them aroun9 the o>ertl) im/erialist /olicies o6 securing *S control o>er oil an9 natural gas su//lies.F!! Just as /ur/orte9 humanitarian concerns are 0heele9 out as ?usti6ications 6or thinl);>eile9 im/erialist 0ars o>er resources+1D militar) contractors an9 0ar /ro6iteering cor/orations /ortra) themsel>es as inclusi>eD sociall) /rogressi>e an9 gen9er;sensiti>e . *n
t6eir cor%orate &e8sitesC t6ese cor%orations# core 8usiness is %ainte3 o9er &it6 a cosmetic 9eneer t6at coul3 cause us to -or/et t6at it is -or &ar an3 killin/ %eo%le. ;or eDam%leC ,enta/on contractors like Nort6ro% 2rumman 8oast o- t6eir E&ork-orce 3i9ersityF!( an3 s6o&case t6eir &omen eDecuti9es. 46e Cana3ian an3 S 3e-ence in3ustries 6a9e set u% or/aniBations like "omen in 1e-ence an3 Security ("i1S)!)C si/ne3 memoran3ums o- un3erstan3in/ &it6 Cana3a#s 1e%artment o- National 1e-enceC an3 are a--iliate3 &it6 t6e Cana3ian 7ssociation o- 1e-ence an3 Security In3ustries (C71SI)!+C an in3ustry5le3 association o- more t6an ''0 mem8er -irms in t6e 3e-ence an3 security in3ustries in Cana3a to E%romote t6e a39ancement o- &omen lea3ers in 3e-ence an3 security %ro-essions across Cana3aF. Rayt6eonC t6e maker o- E>unker >usterF 8om8sC 4oma6a&k an3 ,atriot missilesC lo88e3 at 7-/6anistan an3 IraI!9C causin/ many 3eat6s %roclaims= E1i9ersity at Rayt6eon is a8out inclusi9eness M %ro9i3in/ an atmos%6ere &6ere e9eryone -eels 9alue3 an3 em%o&ere3 to %er-orm at a %eak le9elC re/ar3less o- t6e many &ays %eo%le are 3i--erentF'0. Lir/inia58ase3 >ooB 7llen .amilton'1C one o- t6e 8i//est su%%liers o- tec6nolo/y an3 %ersonnel to S /o9ernment s%y a/encies like t6e CI7C NS7C 1e-ence Intelli/ence 7/ency (1I7)C as &ell as t6e S 1e%artment o- 1e-ence an3 1e%artment o- .omelan3 Security (-ormer CI7 3irector R. Aames "oolsey is no& a senior 9ice %resi3ent o- >ooB 7llen)C also 8oasts 6o& it is committe3 to 3i9ersity in t6e &ork-orce E8ecause &e 8elie9e t6at 3i9ersity o- 8ack/roun3s contri8utes to 3i--erent i3easC &6ic6 in turn 3ri9es 8etter results -or clients. 4o usC 3i9ersity means all t6e &ays in3i9i3uals 3i--er -rom one anot6erMraceC /en3erC et6nicityC %6ysical a8ilitiesC e3ucational 8ack/roun3C country o- ori/inC a/eC seDual orientationC skillsC incomeC marital statusC %arental statusC reli/ionC &ork eD%erienceC an3 military ser9iceF. 46en t6ere is 7e/is 1e-ence Ser9ices'2 &6ose em%loyees &ere cau/6t on 9i3eo ran3omly s6ootin/ automatic &ea%ons at ci9ilian cars in >a/63a3#s air%ort roa3'3C &6ic6 claims E*ur eIual5o%%ortunity %olicy em%6asiBes our aim to create a &ork en9ironment t6at is inclusi9e an3 non53iscriminatoryC &6ere all em%loyees are em%o&ere3 8y t6eir in3i9i3uality an3 encoura/e3 to use it in or3er to ac6ie9e successF. 2reen&as6in/ en9ironmentally 3estructi9e cor%orations is 3es%ica8le enou/6. Oet t6ere is somet6in/ %articularly o8scene a8out t6e &ays in &6ic6 t6ese cor%orations 6i3e 8e6in3 suc6 mission an3 9alues statements an3 commitments to E3i9ersityFC com%lementin/ t6e claims o- t6e militaries in 7-/6anistan to 8e li8eratin/ 7-/6ani &omen.
&in' ( Democrac)
Status Huo 9emocrac) mas's structures o6 /atriarch). :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. 10'510() A0 <nal)ses o6 9emocratization are built on tra3itional 9e6initions o6 9emocrac) that are base9 on t6e le/acy o- "estern li8eral 3emocracyC a legac) that has been /roblematic 6or 0omen. ;eminist %olitical t6eorists
6a9e reeDamine3 t6e meanin/ o- 3emocracy an3 its /en3ere3 im%lications 8y /oin/ 8ack to t6e ori/ins o- "estern 3emocratic institutions. In 6er ree9aluation o- social contract t6eoryC Carole ,ateman 6as outline3 6o& t6e story o- the
social contract as articulate3 8y se9enteent65 an3 ei/6teent65century $uro%ean %olitical t6eorists has been treate9 as an account o6 the creation o6 a /ublic s/here o6 ci>il 6ree9om in 0hich onl) men 0ere en9o0e9 0ith the necessar) attributes 6or entering into contracts . Li8eral 3e-initions o- citiBens as nonseDe3 autonomous in3i9i3uals outsi3e any social conteDt a8stract -rom a "estern male mo3el. .>ol>ing notions o6 citizenshi/ in the ,est 0ere base9 on maleD /ro/ert);o0ning hea9s o6 househol9s@ thusD 9emocratic theor) an9 /ractice ha>e been built on the male;as;norm engage9 in narro0l) 9e6ine9 /olitical acti>ities.31 ,omenC ,ateman claimsC 0ere not /art) to the original contractJ rat6erC the) 0ere incor/orate3 into t6e %ri9ate s%6ere t6rou/6 t6e marria/e contract as 0i>es su8ser9ient to t6eir 6us8an3sC rat6er t6an as in3i9i3uals. 46e %ri9ate s%6ereC a site o- su8:ectionC is %art o- ci9il societyC 8ut se%arate -rom t6e
Eci9ilF s%6ereJ eac6 /ains meanin/ -rom t6e ot6er an3 eac6 is mutually 3e%en3ent on t6e ot6er.32 46is se%aration o- t6e %u8lic an3 %ri9ate s%6eres 6as 6a3 im%ortant rami-ications -or t6e construction an3 e9olution o- %olitical an3 economic institutions at all le9elsJ -eminists see t6em as intimately relate3C 6o&e9er. "6at /oes on in t6e %u8lic s%6ere o- %olitics an3 t6e economy cannot 8e un3erstoo3 as se%arate -rom t6e %ri9ate. .istoricallyC t6ere-oreC terms suc6 as citiBen an3 6ea3 o- 6ouse6ol3 &ere not neutral 8ut associate3 &it6 men. $9en in states &6ere &omen 6a9e ac6ie9e3 -ormal or near5-ormal eIualityC 6eminists ha>e claime9 that
this historical legac) still inhibits their /olitical an9 economic /artici/ation on an eHual basis 0ith men. 7s -eminists -rom t6e Sout6 6a9e %ointe3 outC &6at is E%u8licF in one society may 8e E%ri9ateF in anot6erJ it is trueC 6o&e9erC
t6at &omen#s acti9itiesC suc6 as re%ro3uction an3 c6il3 rearin/C ten3 to 8e 3e9alue3 in all societies. Ne9ert6elessC t6e e9olution o3emocratic %ractices an3 institutions an3 t6eir atten3ant notions o- in3i9i3ual ri/6ts 6a9e certainly 6a3 8ene-its -or &omenJ t6e conce%t o- ri/6ts an3 eIuality &ere im%ortant rationales -or t6e su--ra/e mo9ements o- t6e nineteent6 an3 early t&entiet6 centuries in t6e "est as &ell as -or mo9ements -or &omen#s li8eration an3 6uman ri/6ts in 9arious %arts o- t6e &orl3 to3ay. >utC as ,ateman#s analysis
su//estsC t6e li8eral tra3ition continues to %resent %articular %ro8lems -or &omenJ as s6e %oints outC as/iring to eHualit) assumes that in9i>i9uals can be se/arate9 6rom seEuall) 9i66erentiate9 bo9ies .33 Dee/ structuresD u/hel9 b) the /ublic/ /ri>ate 9i>i9eD ha>e continue9 to 'ee/ 0omen in /ositions o6 subor9inationC e>en a6ter the acHuisition o6 the >ote or ot6er le/al /ainsJ 3es%ite t6e -act t6at &omen 6a9e al&ays %artici%ate3 in t6e %u8lic s%6ere as &orkersC the) 9o not ha>e the same ci>il stan9ing as men in most societies. ;or eDam%leC in t&entiet65century &el-are la&s in t6e "estC men ha>e generall) been 9e6ine9 as brea90inners an9 0omen as 9e/en9entsJ like&iseC immi/ration la&s an3 rules /o9ernin/ re-u/ees 3e-ine &omen as 3e%en3ents &it6 ne/ati9e im%lications -or t6eir le/al status. In t6e nite3 StatesC t6e
conce%t o- -irstclass citiBen 6as -reIuently 8een tie3 to military ser9iceC a 3isa39anta/e -or &omen runnin/ -or %olitical o--ice.3! Stu3ies o- 3emocratic transitions in RussiaC $ast $uro%eC an3 Latin 7merica 3emonstrate some o- t6e %ro8lems associate3 &it6 t6e le/acy o- t6e "estern li8eral tra3ition.3'
&in' ( Democrac)
7istorical eEam/les /ro>e that 9emocrac) is ba9 6or teh 0omenz. :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. 10(510+) A0 46at 9emocratic transitions ma) actually be negati>e 6or 0omen &as most e9i3ent in t6e -ormer So9iet nion an3 some states in $ast $uro%e= gen9er relations associate3 &it6 t6e %u8lic/%ri9ate 3i9i3e t6ere became more /ronounce9. Aecause o6 the elimination o6 Huota s)stems in le/islatures in t6is re/ionC the number o6 0omen in institutional /olitics 0as shar/l) re9uce9 a-ter transitions to 3emocracyC &it6 t6e %ro%ortion o- &omen electe3 to re%resentati9e 8o3ies 3eclinin/ -rom an a9era/e o- 33 %ercent to 10 %ercent. 3( 46is 3ecline &as es%ecially si/ni-icant /i9en t6at le/islati9e 8o3ies 8e/an to %lay a real role in %olicymakin/. It is im%ortant to noteC
6o&e9erC t6at &omen#s re%resentation un3er Communist re/imes &as lar/ely &in3o& 3ressin/= &omen &ere eIually mar/inaliBe3 -rom real centers o- %o&er 8e-ore an3 a-ter 3emocratic transitions.3) In $ast $uro%e an3 RussiaC t6e 3ro% in %olitical %artici%ation o- &omen 3urin/ t6e transition &as accom%anie3 8y a loss o- economic status. 7%%lau3e3 8y li8eralsC t6e transition to mar'et
economies an3 structural a3:ustment associate9 0ith the o%enin/ to t6e global econom) too' 9is/ro/ortionate numbers o6 0omen out o6 the labor 6orce because o6 the nee9 to she9 labor to a9?ust to mar'et com/etitionJ as in ot6er cases o- structural a3:ustmentC t6e state sectorC &6ere &omen are o-ten em%loye3C s6rank 3ramatically. In t6e early 1990sC in all o- eastern Central $uro%e eDce%t .un/aryC &omen constitute3 '0 to )0
%ercent o- total unem%loye3J in %ost5So9iet RussiaC in 1992 t6ey constitute3 )0 %ercent.3+ "6ere &omen &ere &orkin/C t6ey ten3e3 to 8e con-ine3 to tra3itionalC lo&5%ayin/ E-emaleF occu%ations. Gi>en the 9iminishing 9eman9 6or labor an3 t6e erosion
o- state5%ro9i3e3 social ser9ices suc6 as 3ay care an3 6ealt6 careC 0omen 0ere reconstructe9 as 9e/en9ent 0i>esD mothersD consumersD an9 caregi>ersJ &it6 c6il35care an3 maternity lea9e 8ein/ 3ismantle3C 0omen 0ere cast as GunreliableF 0or'ers. n3er socialismC t6e -amily %laye3 t6e role o- an em8ryonic ci9il society re%resentin/ antistate -ree3omJ 6ollo0ing 9emocratizationD the 6amil) 0as reconstructe9D along lines consistent 0ith the liberal tra9itionD as male9ominate9D 6emale;9e/en9ent . 7t t6e same time as &omen &ere reassi/ne3 to t6e %ri9ate s%6ereC t6e %u8lic s%6ere &as 8ein/ re9alue3C t6us accentuatin/ t6e %u8lic/%ri9ate 3i9i3e. >ar8ara $in6orn 6as claime3 t6at these 9e>elo/ments 0ere a return to t6e nineteent65century li8eral 9ersion o- citizenshi/ base9 on /ro/ert) o0ning males (outline3 8y ,ateman)C 0hich rein6orce9 a /atriarchal conce/t o- roles. $in6orn su//ests t6at t6ese roles are %ro-oun3ly un3emocratic.39 In s6ortC &omen#s ri/6ts in $ast $uro%e an3 %ost5Communist Russia ero3e3J 0omen began to be constructe9 as /assi>e beings rat6er t6an mature %olitical su8:ects. In t6e 1990sC as is o-ten true in times oma:or %olitical c6an/eC t6ere &as also a sense t6at &omen#s ri/6ts &ere %eri%6eral an3 t6at &orkin/ to im%ro9e t6em &as a luDuryC /i9en t6e economic 3i--iculties o- transition. In a critiIue o- -eminist literature o- socialist transitionsC AaIui 4rue 6as Iuestione3 its em%6asis on &omen#s 9ictimiBationJ s6e claims t6at t6is literature runs t6e risk o- creatin/ a 9ictimiBe3 i3entity -or t6e &omen o- $ast $uro%e t6at is not unlike t6e cate/ory 46ir3 "orl3 &omenMone t6at %ostcolonial -eminists o8:ect to stron/ly. 4rue#s stu3y o- &omen in t6e CBec6 Re%u8lic su//ests t6at t6ey &ere 8ot6 &inners an3 losers in t6e transition. Ne9ert6elessC s6e %oints to t6e masculiniBation o- a /ro&in/ 6i/65%ai3 %ri9ate sectorC &it6 &omen 8ein/ 3is%ro%ortionately locate3 in lo&er5&a/e3 %u8lic5sector occu%ationsJ s6e conclu3es t6at &omen 6a9e /enerally 8een more 3isa39anta/e3 t6an men 8y structural c6an/es.!0
&in' ( Democrac)
Democrac) /resents an inherent gen9er bias. :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. 110) A0 ,hen /ro/onents o6 li8eral 9emocrac) an3 marketiBation s/ea' o- t6e s%rea3 o- 6uman ri/6ts 8ase3 on"estern notions o- in3i9i3ualismC 6eminists ha>e cautione9 that 8ot6 9e6initions o- 6uman ri/6ts an3 t6e kin3s o- 9iolations t6at /et attention -rom "estern states an3 t6eir 6uman5ri/6ts communities ma) be gen9er biase9. Since basic nee9s an9 0el6are /ro>ision so o6ten 6all to 0omenD an9 since 0omen are 3is%ro%ortionately economicall) 9isa9>antage9C the /re6erence b) ,estern liberal states 6or /olitical rights o>er economic rights ma) also /resent %articular /roblems 6or 0omen. In a33itionC since 6uman5 ri/6ts 9iolations are usually 3e-ine3 as 9iolations 8y o--icials o- t6e stateC 3omestic 9iolence 6as not 8een a %riority on t6e international 6uman5ri/6ts a/en3a. In or9er to un9erstan9 the role o6 gen9erMt6e e--ects o- 3emocratic transitions on &omen an3 t6eir acti9ities in t6ese transitionsM 0e nee9 a re9e6inition o6 9emocrac) that starts at the bottom. Generall) 0omen are better re/resente9 in local /olitics J o-ten t6ey are &orkin/ outsi3e re/ular %olitical c6annels. 2eor/ina"aylen 6as claime3 t6at an) anal)sis o6 9emocratization that 6ails to incor/orate a gen9ere9 /ers/ecti>eKignoring the actions o6 certain grou/sK0ill be 6la0e9.!' 46ere-oreC t6e liberal 9emocratic state must be reeEamine9 6or its gen9er biasesD as &ell as its class an3 racial 8iasesJ 9e6initions o6 re/resentation an9 citizenshi/ in the s/aces in 0hich /olitical li6e occur nee9 to be rethought. <rguing that /atriarchal structures are 3ee%ly embe99e9 in most ty%es o- %olitical re/imesC 3emocratic an3 ot6er&iseC certain internationalist 6eminists ha>e loo'e9 be)on9 the state to 8uil3 institutions an3 net&orks t6at are more likely t6an t6e state to 9iminish gen9er an9 other social hierarchies. 2i9en t6e 8arriers to -ormal %olitical o--ice t6at eDist -or &omen in most
statesC inclu3in/ 3emocraciesC &omen acti9ists -reIuently 8y%ass t6e state 8y &orkin/ eit6er at t6e /rassroots le9el or 8y :oinin/ -orces transnationally to &ork -or &omen#s ri/6ts at t6e /lo8al le9el.
Democrac) mas's male /ri>ilege. :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. 1215122) A0 "6ile li8eraliBation may allo& s%ace -or &omen#s or/aniBin/C t6e issue t6en 8ecomes= "6at kin3 o- state &ill 8est ser9e not only &omen#s interests 8ut %eace an3 securityC 8roa3ly 3e-ine3V 46e li8eral stateC &6ic6 is c6aracteriBe3 8y market 3emocracy rat6er t6an social 3emocracyC is clearly not t6e kin3 o- state t6at -eminists 6a9e in min3. &iberal 9emocrac) has not ins%ire3 -eminists &6o &ork outsi3e t6e li8eral tra3ition 8ecause o- 3ee% structures o- /en3er ineIualityJ t6ese 3ee% structuresC t6ey claimC 6a9e 'e/t 0omen uneHual e>en a6ter the) recei>e9 the >ote an9 other 6ormal rights. 7n im%ortant issue -or -eminist t6eoristsC t6ere-oreC is &6et6er ineIuality can 8e a33resse3 &it6in a li8eral53emocratic -rame&ork or &6et6er t6e mo3el is -un3amentally -la&e3C /i9en t6e structural %ro8lems o- t6e %u8lic/%ri9ate 3i9i3e.+3 7s su//este3 8y ,ateman#s analysisC certain -eminist %olitical t6eorists see a 3ee% /en3er 8ias in 3emocratic t6eory. ;or t6emC see'ing eHualit) in a man-s 0orl9 is /roblematic because it assumes a stan9ar9 o6 normalit) that is maleJ in t6e "estC this stan9ar9 is that o6 0hiteD /ri>ilege9 males.+! :he mo9el o6 the abstract in9i>i9ualC 8e6in3 &6ic6 t6is /en3ere3 re%resentation is 6i33enC is a /o0er6ul im/e9iment to the recognition o6 gen9er as a salient /olitical 6actor . 46e association o- citiBens6i% &it6 masculine c6aracteristics suc6 as rationality an3 autonomy is %ro8lematic -or &omen#s citiBens6i%J 0omen cannot be inclu9e9 in cate/ories associate3 0ith /ublics/here acti>ities that are themsel>es 9e6ine9 b) the eEclusion o6 6emale traits an9 i9entities.+' For 0omen to be eHual /olitical actorsD this must be recognize9.
&in' ( Democrac)
Democrac) is /art o6 an eEce/tionalist mentalit) that /er/etuates 9ominati>e logics an9 shatter eHualit). Plum0oo9 2 (LalC 7ustralian Researc6 Council ;ello& at ni9ersity o- Sy3neyC $n9ironmental Culture= 46e
ecolo/ical crisis o- reasonC %.+15+2) ,A IneIualityC &6et6er insi3e t6e nation or out o- itC is a ma:or s%onsor o- ecolo/ical irrationality an3 remotenessC es%ecially &6ere it creates systematic o%%ortunities an3 moti9ations to s6i-t ecolo/ical ills onto ot6ers rat6er t6an to %re9ent t6eir /eneration in t6e -irst %lace. IneHualit) combines 0ith geogra/hical remoteness to generate eEcellent con9itions 6or e/istemic remotenessD creating ma?or barriers to 'no0le9ge an3 o--erin/ massi9e o%%ortunities -or re3istri8utin/ eco6arms onto ot6ers in &ays t6at elu3e t6e kno&le3/e an3 res%onsi8ility o- consumers an3 %ro3ucers .o/ &it6 concern -or ecolo/ical conseIuences. n3er con3itions &6ic6 allo& 8ot6 remoteness an3 rational e/oism to -louris6C suc6 actions e9en emer/e as man3atory -or t6e rational sel-5maDimiserC since the logic o6 the global mar'et treats the least /ri>ilege9 as the most eE/en9ableD 9e6ining them as as ha>ing Rthe least to loseS in terms o6 the lo0 >alue o6 their healthD Ian9 an9 assetsD an9D b) im/licationD o6 their li>es.S :his logic hel/s ensure that the least /ri>ilege9 are li'el) to 6eel the 6irst an9 0orst im/acts o6 en>ironmental 9egra9ationD as in the case o6 much global 9e6orestationD /ollutionD 0aste 9um/ing in /oor an9 coloure9 communities (suc6 as "arren County)C an9 en>ironmentall) hazar9ous 0or'ing an9 li>ing con9itions 6or the /oor. 7s it comes increasin/ly to 3ominate o9er ot6er s%6eresC t6e /lo8al market systematically 9iolates com%leD eIualityC ena8lin/ Zone /oo3 or one set o- /oo3s Gto 8eH 3ominant an3 3eterminati9e o- 9alue in all t6e s%6eres o- 3istri8utionNZNC -acilitatin/ t6e %ositi9e -ee38ack %atterns a33in/ ecolo/ical ills to social ills &6ic6 are t6e mark o- eco:ustice 9iolations. 46eoreticallyC it seemsC a 3emocracy &6ere all 6a9e in%ut into 3ecisions s6oul3 6a9e a lo& le9el o- remoteness an3 a maDimum o- ecolo/ical rationality. It s6oul3 6a9e a 6i/6 le9el o- correcti9eness 8ecause it s6oul3 maDimise t6e in-ormational 8ase rele9ant to en9ironmental 3e/ra3ation. It s6oul3 ena8le all a--ecte3 citiBens to 8e 6ear3 an3 to 6a9e t6eir issues a33resse3 8y res%onsi9e 3ecision5 makers. : >ut in actually5eDistin/ li8eral 3emocracyC it 3oesnNt seem to &ork Iuite like t6atC an3 it is commonl) obser>e9 that liberal 9emocracies are not /er6orming 0ell either in reme 9)ing ecological crises or in listening to 9isa9>antage9 citizens.RS Shallo0 6orms o6 9emocratic /olitics /ro>i9e onl) 0ea' 6orms o6 ecological rationalit)D not 0ell correlate9 0ith correcti>eness on ecological or social mattersD an9 their ineHualities allo0 /ri>ilege9 grou/s man) o//ortunities 6or remoteness. >ut -rom t6is o8ser9ation &e can 3ra& -e& conclusions a39erse to t6e ecolo/ical rationality o- t6e 3ee%er -orms o3emocracy t6at are 8etter %lace3 to ena8le systematic re3uctions in remoteness. I3enti-yin/ t6e structural -eatures t6at account -or t6ese rationality -ailures o- li8eral 3emocracy is more 3i--icult t6an notin/ t6e -ailures. 1ryBek (1992) ar/ues %ersuasi9ely t6at t6e %olitical an3 a3ministrati9e s/heres o6 liberal ca/italism are unable to res/on9 a9eHuatel) to the com/leEit) o6 the ecological /roblems generate9 b) its im/risoning ca/italist /ro9uction s)stems. :he interest grou/ inter/retation o6 liberal 9emocrac) is another 6eature 0hich is highl) /roblematic 6rom the /ers/ecti>e o6 ecological rationalit) . It is increasin/ly a%%arent t6at t6e -orm o- Zinterest /rou%N %olitics t6at -louris6es in li8eral 3emocracy is una8le to create sta8le measures -or t6e %rotection o- natureC or to reco/nise 8asic ecolo/ical %riority t6at ecolo/ical &ell58ein/ is not :ust anot6er interest /rou% concern 8ut ultimately a con3ition -or most ot6er interests. 46is -ailure is an as%ect o- its 3enial an3 ne/lect o- collecti9e li-e. :he conce/tion o6 9emocrac) an9 9ecision; ma'ing in terms o6 a central state me9iating a multi/licit) o6 com/eting (%ri9ate) interest grou/s ta'es egoismD ineHualit) an9 9omination 6or grante9D /ro>i9es /oorl) 6or collecti>e goo9sD an9 allo0s s)stematic re9istribution o6 ecological ills to 0ea'er grou/s. It %laces many key en9ironmental 9alues in a 3isem%o&ere3 %ri9ate realm 8eyon3 t6e reac6 o- %olitics.
states t6at 6a9e recently un3er/one 3emocratic transitionsC IR -eminists 6a9e reanalyBe3 3emocratiBation an3 eD%ose3 its /en3er 8iases. 46ey 6a9e also %ointe3 out t6at the norms an9 rules u/on 0hich ,estern 9emocrac) has been built an3 t6at 6a9e 8een carrie3 u% into international or/aniBations are gen9ere9. *ni>ersalist claims embo9ie9 in such international norms as human rights are base9 on male 9e6initions o6 rights. 7lt6ou/6 not normally inclu3e3 in con9entional IR a/en3asC 9emocratization at all le>elsD 6rom the local to the globalD has been central to IR -eminist analyses. In calling 6or a 6orm o6 9emocrac) that 9ismantles o//ressi>e social hierarchiesD 6eminists ha>e begun to buil9 mo9els o6 9emocrac) that rethin' the state an9 its international securit) /olicies.
International institutions /er/etuate /atriarch). :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. 1115112) A0 "omen#s lo& rate o- %artici%ation in t6e nite3 NationsC %articularly in states# 3i%lomatic missionsMa %attern t6at 6as 8een re%licate3 in many ot6er I2*sMsu//ests t6at &omen#s attem%ts to /ain le9era/e at t6is le9el 6asC in many casesC 8een less success-ul t6an at t6e national le9el. 7s 7nne Runyan 112 3emocratiBation &arnsC there is a 9anger o6 tra9ing gen9ere9 nationalism 6or gen9ere9 internationalism. !9 Since inter/o9ernmental or/aniBations re%resent t6e 9ie&s o- /o9ernments o- t6eir mem8er states rat6er t6an t6eir %o%ulationsC this lac' o6 trans/arenc) com/oun9s the un9erre/resentation o6 0omen-s >oicesD as 0ell as those o6 men 6rom eEclu9e9 or marginalize9 grou/s. 7s t6e *nite9 ations has begun to /le9ge to Gmainstream a gen9er /ers/ecti>e CF t6e Iuestion 8ecomes= ,hose /ers/ecti>e 0ill be re/resente9D 0hen grou/s 0ith the most resources are the most li'el) to gain accessT'0 International or/aniBations suc6 as t6e *nite9 ations ha>e /la)e9 an im/ortant role in /romulgating uni>ersal norms an3 stan3ar3s o- con3uct t6atC as 3iscusse3 earlierC 6a9e 8een seen 8y certain &orl35or3er sc6olars as in3icatin/ t6e 8e/innin/s o- a /lo8al society or an eDtension o- t6e 8oun3aries o- %olitical community 8eyon3 t6e nation5state.'1 "6ile -eminists also assume t6e %ossi8ility o- community 8eyon3 statist 8oun3ariesC the) Huestion the eEtent to 0hich these uni>ersalizing norms are base9 on male eE/eriences . >ot6 -eminist t6eorists an3 &omen or/aniBin/ t6rou/6 social mo9ements an3 non/o9ernmental or/aniBations (N2*s) 6a9e &orke3 6ar3 to 8rin/ t6ese /en3er 8iases to li/6t an3 to try to re-rame norms an3 rules in &ays t6at /et 8eyon3 t6em. *ne suc6 eDam%le 6as 8een t6e re-ormulation o- t6e meanin/ o- 6uman ri/6ts.
&in' ( State
otions o6 so>ereignt) an9 the state are inherentl) masculine. :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. '!) A0 "6ile critical5security stu3ies 6as em%6asiBe3 t6e im%ortance o- i3entity -or un3erstan3in/ state 8e6a9iorC 6eminist theorizing is 3istincti9e inso-ar as it re>eals 6o& t6ese i3entities o-ten 3e%en3 on t6e mani/ulations o6 gen9er. 7n eDamination o- t6e 6istorical 3e9elo%ment o- state so>ereignt) an3 state i3entities as t6ey 6a9e e9ol9e3 o9er time 3oes in3ee3 suggest 9ee/l) gen9ere9 constructions that ha>e not inclu9e9 0omen on t6e same terms as men. $arly states in siDteent65 an3 se9enteent65century $uro%e &ere i3enti-ie3 &it6 t6e %erson o- t6e so9erei/n kin/. 7obbes-s 3e%iction o- t6e &e>iathanC a man in armor &earin/ a cro&n an3 carr)ing a s0or9C ser>es as a >isual re/resentation o6 t6is early5mo3ern -orm oso>ereign authorit). "it6 t6e a39ent o- re%u8lican -orms o- /o9ernment in t6e ei/6teent6 an3 nineteent6 centuriesC the i9entit) o6 the G/eo/leF remaine9 limite9I 0omen 0ere incor/orate9 slo0l) into the /olitical /rocess an3 it is still Iuestiona8le &6et6er t6ey 6a9e ac6ie9e3 a le/itimate 9oice in t6e construction o- -orei/n %olicy.(0 "e must conclu3eC t6ere-oreC t6at the historical construction o6 the stateD u/on 0hich the unitar);actor mo9el in international theor) is base9D re/resents a gen9ere9D masculine mo9el. In t6e "estC t6e ima/e o- a 6oreign /olic) ma'er has been strongl) associate9 0ith eliteC &6ite males an3 re%resentations o- hegemonic masculinit).
:he ,ar on :error has 9emote9 0omen to being the >ictims Pettman + (Aan Ain3yC 1irector o- "omen#s Stu3ies S 7N C >ro&n Aournal o- "orl3 7--airs 10(2)C
"inter/S%rin/ 200!C %. ++)I0
In an early res%onse to t6is crisisC 7nn 4ickner aske3C E"6at can a -eminist analysis a33 to our un3erstan3in/ o- 9/11 an3 its a-termat6VF20 S6e 3emonstrate3 t6at 6emi; nists 3o ha>e some 9ery im%ortant things to sa) regar9ing the gen9er o6 i9entit)D >io; lenceD an9 0arC an3 s%eci-ically 3e9elo%e3 t6ese insi/6ts in relation to $/11 an9 <6; ghanistan. Like&ise .ilary C6arles&ort6 an3 C6ristine C6inin21 8e/an t6eir com5 mentary &it6 t6e claim t6at Rconce/ts o6 seE an9 gen9er /ro>i9e a >aluable /ers/ecti>e on these 9e>astating actions#.22 >ot6 articles note3 t6e a%%arent 3isa%%earance o- &omen in t6e 9iolence an3 &6at -ollo&e3C as menKhi?ac'ersD rescuersD national securit) o66ic; ers C an3 me3ia commentatorsM6ille9 our screens an9 ne0s/a/ers.23 ESe/tember 11 an9 its re/ercussions ha>e a//eare9D thenD to be all about men attac'ingD sa>ing li>esD an9 res/on9ing through 6urther attac' CF &6ic6 seems normal.2! Su8stitute 19 &omen 6i:ackersC commentatorsC an3 lea3ersC an3 a 3i--erent scenario 3e9elo%s.2' So too 0omenD let alone -eministsC 0ere not seen as authorities ha>ing an)thing to a99 to the anal)sis. ;or eDam%leC accor3in/ to t6e 2uar3ian sur9ey o- almost '0 o%inion %ieces in t6e Ne& Oork 4imes in t6e -irst siD &eeks a-ter t6e attackC only t&o &ere 8y &omen.2( It is Iuite &ron/ 6o&e9er to su//est t6at /en3er 6a3 3isa%%eare3 or e9en t6at &omen &ere not %resent. ,omen
a//eare9 in 0a)s long embe99e9 in the gen9ere9 0ar stor). :he) a//eare9 alongsi9e men as >ictims an9 relati>es o6 >ictims o6 $/11.
:he ,ar on :error /ro>es that states shoul9 be hel9 res/onsible 6or /ri>ate >iolations o6 international la0 ( ho0e>er the) still turn a blin9 e)e to the /ri>ate abuse o6 0omen Johnstone $ (Rac6aelC La& S o- 7kureyri Icelan3C C6ica/o5<ent Aournal o- International an3 Com%arati9e
La&C %. 3(C&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/;eministP2046eoryP20an3P202en3erP20 Stu3ies P207rc6i9e.%3-)I0 :he *nite3 States# a3ministration in the imme3iate a6termath o6 $/11 share9 the Era3ical 6eministF /ositionC e9i3ence3 8y t6e -amous statement o- t6e %resi3ent on Se%tem8er 11 t6at E,e 0ill ma'e no 9istinction bet0een the terrorists 0ho committe9 these acts an9 those 0ho harbor them.F1'( 46e %resi3ent eD%an3e3 u%on t6is later t6e
same mont6C statin/= >y ai3in/ an3 a8ettin/ mur3erC t6e 4ali8an re/ime is committin/ mur3er . . . $9ery nationC in e9ery re/ionC no& 6as a 3ecision to make. $it6er you are &it6 usC or you are &it6 t6e terrorists. ;rom t6is 3ay -or&ar3C an) nation that continues to harbor or su//ort terrorism 0ill be regar9e9 b) the *nite9 States as a hostile regime .F1') In No9em8er 2001C 6e continue3= EI6 )ou harbor terroristsD )ou are terrorists . I- you train or arm a terroristC you are a terrorist. I- you -ee3 a terrorist or -un3 a terroristC you#re a terroristC an9 )ou 0ill be hel9 accountable b) the *nite9 States an9 our 6rien9s.F1'+ I- t6is eDam%le o- state %ractice an3 t6e &i3e o%inio iuris in its su%%ort is to 8e consi3ere3 as su--icient to constitute a ne& rule o- customary international la&C t6en t6e more ra3ical -eminists 6a9e &on a 8attleC al8eit in a manner t6ey mi/6t t6emsel9es -in3 3i--icult to su%%ort.1+! In s6ortC this ne0 rule hol9s that states are res%onsi8leC 9irectl) res/onsibleD 6or /ermitting /ri>ate >iolations o6 international la0 to occur. Go>ernments in such
circumstances shoul9 antici/ate the /ossibilit) o6 imme9iate re/ercussions against their o0n institutionsC not :ust a/ainst t6e %ri9ate actors &6o 3irectly cause3 t6e 6arm.
&in' ( I;&a0
International la0 banishes 0omen to the /ri>ate s/here 0here the) are be)on9 the reach o6 state res/onsibilit) Johnstone $ (Rac6aelC La& S o- 7kureyri Icelan3C C6ica/o5<ent Aournal o- International an3 Com%arati9e
La&C %. 1)C &&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/;eministP2046eoryP20an3P202en3erP20 Stu3ies P207rc6i9e.%3-)I0
C6arles&ort6 et al.C reco/niBe3 t6at t6e %recise 8oun3aries o- &6at constitutes %u8lic an3 %ri9ate 9ary 8et&een 3i--erent cultures.3' Nonet6elessC a common -eature &as t6at 0hene>er there 0as a /ri>ate s/hereD 0omen 0ere 6oun9 there.3( .o&e9erC in areas consi9ere9 /ublicD 0omen 0ere missingD in>isibleD or 6e0 in num8er.3) :his 9i>ision o6 /ublic an9 /ri>ate s/heresC emer/in/ -rom t6e "estern Li8eral tra3itionC 0as no0 entrenche9 in international la0.3+ Not only are t6e s%6eres se%arateC but the /ri>ate s/here an9 the 0omen 0ithin it are regar9e9 as less im/ortant.39 0oreo9erC Ga uni>ersal /attern o6 i9enti6)ing 0omenSs acti>ities as /ri>ateD an9 thus o6 lesser >alueD can be 9etecte9.F!0 46e classical %rinci%les o- state res%onsi8ility assume t6at only acts o- state /i9e rise to 6uman ri/6ts 9iolations. 7arms that occur in /ri>ate might be un0elcomeD but the) are not consi9ere9 matters o6 human rights or a -ortiori international la0.!1 C6arles&ort6 an3 C6inkin contest t6is assum%tion at t6e 6eart o- international la&. C6arles&ort6 ar/ues= Ei6 >iolence against 0omen is un9erstoo9C not :ust as a8errant 8e6a9iorC 8ut as
/art o6 the structure o6 the uni>ersal subor9ination o6 0omenD it can ne>er be consi9ere9 a /urel) G/ri>ateF issue.F'' C6inkin a33s= E"6y s6oul3 t6e state only 8e res%onsi8le -or t6e internationally &ron/-ul acts o- state or/ansV
46e state claims :uris3iction o9er t6e totality o- -unctions &it6in its territorial controlJ it mi/6t t6ere-ore 8e a%%ro%riate to assert its res%onsi8ility -or all &ron/-ul acts emanatin/ -rom itC or -rom nationals su8:ect to its :uris3iction.F'( 4o/et6erC t6ey ar/ue= E:here no reason 0h) t6e maintenance o- a legal an9 social s)stem in &6ic6 9iolence a/ainst &omen is en3emic an3 acce%te3
is
shoul9 not engage state res/onsibilit) 9irectl)D 0hether or not 0omen are treate9 9i66erentl) 6rom men in this res/ect.F') 1es%ite a39ances in 6uman ri/6ts la& &it6 res%ect to states# %ositi9e 3uties to %rotectC >iolations o6 the rights o6 0omen are still not ta'en as seriousl) as those o6 men.)! 0oreo9erC t6e %re-erence -or ci9il an3
%olitical ri/6ts re-lects men#s eD%eriences o- t6e nee3 -or %rotection a/ainst t6e state. C6arles&ort6 an3 C6inkin consi3er t6e ri/6t to li-eC lar/ely un3erstoo3 as reIuirin/ %rotection a/ainst state t6reatsC 8ut not a/ainst t6e risk o- 8ein/ concei9e3 -emale.
&in' ( I;&a0
International la0 9enies 0omen a sense o6 sel6 b) 6ailing to hol9 states res/onsible 6or >iolence against 0omen Johnstone $ (Rac6aelC La& S o- 7kureyri Icelan3C C6ica/o5<ent Aournal o- International an3 Com%arati9e
La&C %. !3C&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/;eministP2046eoryP20an3P202en3erP20 Stu3ies P207rc6i9e.%3-)I0
.an3 in 6an3 &it6 t6e li8eraliBation o- t6e market in t6e %ost5inter9ention economies comes t6e -urt6er rei-ication o- t6e %u8lic/%ri9ate 3ic6otomies lon/ criticiBe3 8y -eminists in "estern 3emocraciesC as 0omen "an9 >iolence against them# are consi9ere9 non;/olitical. "omen are e--ecti9ely eDclu3e3 -rom %ositions o- /o9ernance in 7-/6anistan an3 IraIC an3 similarly 6a9e 8een lar/ely eDclu3e3 in ne/otiations 8et&een com%etin/ -actions.20) 46e "male# sel6;9eclare9 lea9ers are /resume9 to s/ea' 6or all an9 0omen-s rights become a matter o6 relati>e cultural >alues.20+ :his is sel6;
9etermination o6 a highl) selecti>e Gsel6.F Uiolence against 0omen Hua 0omen is consi9ere9 a matter o6 9omestic la0C an3 0hen 9omestic /rocess 6ails to ta'e it seriousl)D no Huestions are raise9 8y t6e state#s allies about the legitimac) o6 the go>ernment or its so>ereign in>iolabilit).209 1es%ite c6an/es in t6e lan/ua/e o- state res%onsi8ilityC little has change9 6or 0omen since t6e Eli8erationF o- <u&ait -rom t6e o%%ressi9e IraIi in9a3er in
1991C a-ter &6ic6 <u&aiti &omen remaine3 3isen-ranc6ise3 -rom t6e electoral %rocess an3 -orei/n &omen -oun3 t6emsel9es tar/ets oseDual 9iolence 8y <u&aiti menC o-ten ostensi8ly un3er color o- state aut6ority.210
Link I5La&
International la& continues t6e su8or3ination o- &omen 8ecause it 3oes not reIuire action in t6e -ace o- a8use !hin'in $$ (C6ristineC Int La& S o- Lon3onC 7 CritiIue o- t6e ,u8lic/,ri9ate 1imensionC $uro%ean Aournal oInternational La&C %. 392)I0 :he 6eminist critiHue also has /articular resonance in international la0. Aecause the state 9oes not incur res/onsibilit) 6or >iolations committe9 0ithin the /ri>ate sectorD it can ignore t6e continue3 subor9ination o6 0omen in t6at arena. 46usC 9omestic >iolence against 0omen can be 9esignate9 as a %ri9ate &ron/C an in3i9i3ual matter that is outsi9e international scrutin). 46e tra3ition o- >ie0ing seEual con9uct as /ri>ate allo0s seEual abuse b) /ublic o66icialsC suc6 as %rison o--icials or %olice o--icersC also to be rea9il) 9iscounte9 as not coming 0ithin their o66icial 9uties. Failure b) a state to in>estigate an9 /unish such matters is a continuation o6 the eEclusion o6 -amily//ri>ate li6e e9en -rom 3omestic le/al inter9ention an3 t6us -ar 6rom international accountabilit). SimilarlyC treatment o- 3omestic -orei/n mai3s &it6in -orei/n states can 8e -actore3 out -rom
international la&. 1i%lomatic %rotection o- aliens &as t6e 6istoric startin/ %oint -or t6e -ormulation o- %rinci%les o- state res%onsi8ility an3 t6e 8asis -or t6e 3i--erentiation 8et&een ultra 9ires acts o- o--icials -or &6ic6 t6ere is res%onsi8ility 8ecause o- t6eir a%%arent aut6orityC an3 t6e %ri9ate acts o- in3i9i3uals -or &6ic6 t6ere is no res%onsi8ility. 46e em%loyment o- -orei/n mai3s -alls &it6in 8ot6 ot6ese areas= t6eir 6ouse6ol3 &ork is %ri9ate an3 o-ten conceale3 -rom 3omestic le/al re/ulation an3 t6eir em%loymentC e9en 8y /o9ernment o--icialsC is not in t6at ca%acity. Oet t6eir em%loyment a8roa3 is o- ma:or economic si/ni-icance to many sen3in/ states an3 su%%orte3 8y recei9in/ states. 46eir 0i9es/rea9 abuse in many states is not /ri>ateD but s)stemicD it is u/hel9 b) go>ernment /olicies that 6ail to enIuire a8out t6eir treatment or to o66er /rotection against 'no0n abusesD an9
International la0 ignores /ri>ate con9uctD thereb) mas'ing abuse in the /ri>ate s/here !hin'in $$ (C6ristineC Int La& S o- Lon3onC 7 CritiIue o- t6e ,u8lic/,ri9ate 1imensionC $uro%ean Aournal oInternational La&C %. 3+)53++)I0 :he International La& Commission#s (I&!# Dra6t <rticles on State Res/onsibilit) a3o%te3 on -irst rea3in/ in 199( are
currently 8ein/ re9ise3 in li/6t o- /o9ernment comments 8y t6e S%ecial Ra%%orteurC Aames Cra&-or3. 7lt6ou/6 t6eir -inal -orm remains unresol9e3C si/ni-icant %arts o- t6e 1ra-t 7rticles ha>e alrea3y been relie9 u/onC -or eDam%le 8y t6e International Court oAusticeC as customar) international la0. 46e S%ecial Ra%%orteur 6as em%6asiBe3 t6at the articles 3o not encom%ass %rimary rules o- international o8li/ationC 8ut 9escribe the secon3ary rules o6 state res/onsibilit) 6or the commission o6 an internationall) 0rong6ul act. Res%onsi8ility o- ot6er international actorsC suc6 as international /o9ernment or/aniBationsC an3 in3i9i3ual res%onsi8ility -or international crimes 3o no -orm %art o- t6is re-erence . :he conce/t o6 state
res/onsibilit) rests u/on 9istinguishing acts an9 omissions that can be attribute9 to the state 6rom those that cannotC -or it is aDiomatic t6at /ri>ate con9uct is not in %rinci%le attributable to the state. 7rticle ' sets out t6e /eneral %rinci%le o- attri8ution to t6e state o- t6e acts o- its or/ans. <ttribution 9oes not 9e/en9 u/on a 6unctional classi6ication o6 acti>ities but u/on the characterization o6 the actor as a state organD acting in that ca/acit). Nor is t6e %osition o- a %articular or/an &it6in t6e or/aniBational structure o- t6e state 3eterminati9e. I9enti6ication o6 a state organD an9 the res/onsibilities thereinD is establishe9 %rimarily in accor9ance 0ith international la0.
Link I5La&
46e uni9ersalism o- international la& %re9ents t6e %rotection o- &omen#s 6uman ri/6ts Isoto + "AibianD Int. &a0D * o6 Gu)anaD *ni>ersalism an9 Regionalism in International &a0D
/e3i.o8:ectis.net/e9entos51/ilsa8rasil200+/arti/os/36e6/isoto.%3-)I0 *ni>ersalism assumes that the 0orl9 is /o9erne3 an3 o/erates un9er a single s)stem that is a//licable to states an3 ot6er le/al %ersons. .o&e9erC alt6ou/6 international la& assumes t6at states are linke3 8y a common %ur%ose an3 3estinyC it
is su8mitte3 t6at t6e &orl3#s 3i9ersity is re-lecte3 in t6e 3i--erent i3eolo/iesC culturesC re/ionsC economic a39ancement an3 ot6er -actors t6at a--ect international relations. 46ere-oreC not0ithstan9ing uni>ersalismD 9i>ersit) is e>i9ent to an) obser>er . :he 9ebate on uni>ersalism an3 re/ionalism in international la0 /oses challenges an3 %ers%ecti9es to&ar3s international coo/eration an3 con-lict resolution. S%eci-icallyC in t6e 3e9elo%ment an3 a%%lica8ility -or a uni-orm stan3ar3 ointernational 6uman ri/6ts la& an3 international 6umanitarian la&C the uni>ersalit) o6 human rights has been an9 is still a sub?ect o6 intense 9ebate. :his o- course /oses challenges 6or the uni>ersal /romotion an9 /rotection o6 human rights stan9ar9sC in a 3i9erse &orl3. In some cases uni9ersalism is o-ten 9ie&e3 as a construct o- &estern 6e/emony an3 im%erialismC es/eciall) in res/ect to the /romotion an9 /rotection o6 the human rights o6 0omen . 46is %a%er seeks to 3iscuss 6o& uni>ersalism an3 re/ionalism /oses a challenge to international coo%eration in the %romotion an3 /rotection o6 0omen un9er the human rights cor/us. ,art II s6all 3eal &it6 t6e international la& 8asis -or uni9ersalism 8ase3 on t6e %ro9isions o- 3i--erent treaties as &ell as customary international la&. ,art III s6all 3iscuss 6uman ri/6ts la&C s%eci-ically analyBin/ t6e ri/6ts o- &omen in relation to uni9ersalism an3 re/ionalism. ,art IL s6all %lace t6e 3e8ate on uni9ersalism an3 re/ionalism in res%ect to international 6umanitarian la& in as -ar as it o--ers %rotection -or &omen in res%ect to /en3er crimes. ,art L conclu3es t6e %a%er.
&in' ( u'es
Discourses about nuclear 0ea/ons are in6use9 0ith 9ichotomies 0hich 6a>or the masculine o>er the 6eminine Duncanson an9 .schle 5 (Claire an3 Cat6erineC o- $3in8ur/6 an3 o- Strat6cly3eC Ne& ,olitical Science
30(!)C %. '!()I0
"e &rite -rom t6e %ers%ecti9e o- a E6eminist
anti;militarismCF! &6ic6 Ere?ects 8ot6 the militar) an9 /olitical use o6 0ea/ons o6 mass 9estruction in 0ar6are or 6or 9eterrence . It is also 3ee%ly critical o6 the 9iscourses 0hich ha>e 6rame9 /ublic 9iscussion o6 0ea/ons o6 mass 9estruction.F' 1e9elo%in/ out o- a lon/ tra3ition o- -eminist in9ol9ement in %eace an3 anti5&ar mo9ementsC( t6is %osition is -eminist 8ecause it sees gen9er as /la)ing a 'e) role in &arC in t6e culture o- rea3iness an3 ent6usiasm -or &ar kno&n as militarismD an9 in the reliance on G0ea/ons o6 mass 9estructionF like 4ri3ent. "6at is /en3erV ;eminists no& o--er multi%le an3 sometimes con[ictin/ accounts o- t6is key conce%t.)
;ollo&in/ Carol Co6nC %er6a%s t6e most im%ortant &riter on /en3er an3 nuclear &ea%onsC &e &ant to em%6asise t6ree 3imensions 6ere.+ Firstl)D gen9er as a cate/ory hel/s us un9erstan9 the 0a)s in 0hich in3i9i3ual (an3 collecti9e) i9entit) is sociall) constructe9 aroun3 an3 through assum/tions about male/-emale seDual 3i--erenceC or the categories o6 masculinit) an9 6emininit). Secon9l)D gen9er is Ga 0a) o6 structuring relations o6 /o0erCF9 one 0hich most -eminists a/ree Esho0s constanc) in assigning greater >alue to t6at &6ic6 is associate3 &it6 masculinit) an9 lesser >alue to t6at associate3 &it6 6emininit) . . . t6e terms are not in3e%en3ent 8ut -orm a 6ierarc6ical (uneIual) relation.F10 :hir9l)C E/en3er also -unctions as a sym8olic system= our i9eas about gen9er /ermeate an9 sha/e our i9eas about many ot6er as%ects o- society 8eyon3 male -emale relationsMinclu3in/ %oliticsC 0ea/onsD an9 0ar6are.F11 46is means t6at 9iscourses about nuclear 0ea/onsC amon/st ot6er t6in/sC are in6use9 0ith a series o6 conce/tual 9ichotomies &6ic6 [o& -rom an3 un3er%in t6e %rimary si/ni\ers o- masculine/-eminineC 0ith the masculine si9e o6 the 9ichotom) 6a>oure9 o>er the 6eminine. "e &oul3 a33 t6at -eminist &ork 6as increasin/ly insiste3 on t6e com%leDity &it6 &6ic6 /en3er o%eratesC intersectin/ &it6 ot6er -orms o- %o&er an3 i3entity in conteDt5s%eci\c &ays. 46is means t6at &e s6oul3 not -all into t6e tra% o- t6inkin/ t6at t6ere is only one -orm o- masculinity an3 one o- -emininityMrat6er t6ere are multi%le 9ersions o- eac6C some o- &6ic6 are more 3ominantC or E6e/emonicCF t6an ot6ers at %articular %laces an3 times.12 7s a result D 0e shoul9 eE/ect a
/articular gen9ere9 9iscourse to construct an9 mobilise mar'ers an9 s)mbols o6 multi/le an9 e>en conVicting masculinities an9 6emininities.
uclear imager) is inherentl) masculine in its 9issociating us to the realit) o6 the horror o6 nuclear catastro/he !ohn 53 (CarolC Researc6er an3 4eac6er at .ar9ar3 0e3ical Si/nsC KSeD an3 1eat6 in a &orl3 o- 1e-ense
IntellectualsKC 6tt%=//&&&.:stor.or//sta8le/%3-%lus/31)!209.%3-) ,A
Nuclear missiles are 8ase3 in Ksilos.K *n a 4ri3ent su8marineC &6ic6 carries t&enty5-our multi%le &ar6ea3 nuclear missilesC cre& mem8ers call t6e %art o- t6e su8marine &6ere t6e missiles are line3 u% in t6eir silos rea3y -or launc6in/ Kt6e C6ristmas tree -arm.K "6at coul3 8e more 8ucolic5-armsC silosC C6ristmas treesV
In the e9er5-rien3lyC e9en romantic 0orl9 o6 nuclear 0ea/onr)D ene;mies JeEchangeJ 0arhea9sI one missile Jta'es outJ anotherI 0ea/ons s)stems can Kmarr) u/JI Jcou/lingJ is sometimes use9 to re6er to the 0iring bet0een mechanisms o6 0arning an9 res/onseD or to the /s)cho;/olitical lin's bet0een strategic (intercontinental) an9 theater ($uro%ean5 8ase3) 0ea/ons. 46e %atterns in &6ic6 a 0IRLe3 missileNs nuclear &ar56ea3s lan3 is kno&n as a K-oot%rint.K21 46ese nuclear eD%losi9es are not 3ro%%e3J a K8usK K3eli9ersK t6em. In a33itionC nuclear
8om8s are not re-erre3 to as 8om8s or e9en &ar6ea3sJ t6ey are re-erre3 to as Kreentry 9e6iclesCK a term -ar more 8lan3 an3 8eni/nC &6ic6 is t6en s6ortene3 to KRLsCK a term not only totally a8stract an3 remo9e3 -rom t6e reality o- a 8om8 8ut also resonant &it6 t6e ima/e o- t6e recreational 9e6icles o- t6e i3eal -amily 9acation. :hese 9omestic images must be
more than sim%ly one more 6orm o6 9istancingC one more 0a) to remo>e onesel6 6rom the grisl) realit) behin9 the 0or9sJ or3inary a8straction is a3eIuate to t6at task. Somet6in/ elseC somet6in/ 9ery %eculiarC is /oin/ on 6ere. !alling the /attern in 0hich bombs 6all a J6oot/rintK almost seems a &ill-ul 9istorting /rocessD a /la)6ulD /er>erse re6usal o6 accountabilit);because to be accountable to realit) is to be unable to 9o this 0or'. :hese 0or9s ma) also ser>e to 9omesticateD to tame the 0il9 an9 uncontrollable 6orces o6 nuclear 9estruction. 46e meta%6ors minimiBeJ t6ey are a &ay to make %6enomena t6at are 8eyon3 &6at t6e min3 can encom%ass smaller an3 sa-erC an3 t6us the)
&in' ( u'es
:he 9iscourse o6 nuclear 0ea/ons is inherentl) /hallic an9 ties to masculinit) an9 seEual /otenc) Duncanson an9 .schle 5 (Claire an3 Cat6erineC o- $3in8ur/6 an3 o- Strat6cly3eC Ne& ,olitical Science
30(!)C %. '!+)I0
*n t6e \rst %ointC -eminists 6a9e lon/ 6i/6li/6te3 t6at the
/olitical an9 militar) /o0er associate9 0ith nuclear 0ea/ons is lin'e9 meta/horicall) 0ith seEual /otenc) an9 masculinit). 46is linka/e is neit6er ar8itrary nor tri9ial= seEual meta/hors are a 0a) o6 mobilising gen9ere9 associations in or3er to create eEcitement aboutD su//ort 6or an9 i9entiWcation 0ith 8ot6 the 0ea/ons an9 the %olitical regime /ossessing them.1' 46us -eminist 6istories o- t6e 3e9elo%ment o- the nuclear arms race in t6e 3eca3es a6ter ,orl9 ,ar :0o 9emonstrate"s# t6e eDtent to &6ic6 it 0as a race to /ro>e masculine /ro0essC -uelle3 8y EmissileF en9yC1( 0ith the nuclear 0ea/ons o- t6e Col3 "ar su%er%o&ers E0heele9 out li'e monumental /hallusesF on /ara9e.1) Such imager) has /ro>e9 se9ucti>e to man) go>ernments across time an9 s/ace. 46us &6en In3ia eD%lo3e3 \9e
nuclear 3e9ices in 0ay 199+C .in3u nationalist lea3er >alas6a6e8 46akeray ar/ue3 t6at EG&He 6a9e to %ro9e t6at &e are not eunuc6sF an3 ,rime 0inister 7tal >e6ari La:%ayee &as %ortraye3 in a ne&s%a%er cartoon as %ro%%in/ u% 6is coalition &it6 a nuclear 8om8C ca%tione3 E0a3e &it6 Lia/ra.F1+ In3ee3C as In3ian no9elist 7run36ati Roy 6as commente3= Rea3in/ t6e %a%ersC it &as o-ten 6ar3 to tell &6en %eo%le &ere re-errin/ to Lia/ra (&6ic6 &as com%etin/ -or secon3 %lace on t6e -ront %a/es) an3 &6en t6ey &ere talkin/ a8out t6e 8om8ME"e 6a9e su%erior stren/t6 an3 %otency.F19 Similar language has /ermeate9 the nuclear 9iscourse o6 the militar) an9 9e6ence in9ustr). In 6er /roun358reakin/ stu3y o- the 9iscourse o6 <merican 9e6ence intellectuals 0ho 6ormulate9 nuclear 0ea/ons /olic) 3urin/ t6e Col3 "arC Co6n note3 t6at seEualise9 meta/horsD /hallic imager) an9 the /romise o6 seEual 9omination thri>e9 .20 &ectures 0ere 9ominate9 b) 9iscussion o6@ >ertical erector launchersC t6rust5to5&ei/6t ratiosC so-t lay 3o&nsC 9ee/ /enetrationD an9 the com/arati>e a9>antages o6 %rotracte3 9ersus s%asm attacksMor &6at one military a39iser to t6e National Security Council 6as calle3 Ereleasing 30 to 50 /ercent o6 our megatonnage in one orgasmic 0hum/.F21
SeEual imager) emasculates 9isarmament an9 9enies the 9ea9l) conseHuences o6 nuclear 9e/lo)ment Duncanson an9 .schle 5 (Claire an3 Cat6erineC o- $3in8ur/6 an3 o- Strat6cly3eC Ne& ,olitical Science
30(!)C %. '!9)I0
Co6n su//ests t6at suc6 seEual imager) ser>es not only to un3erline t6e connections 8et&een masculine seDuality an3 nuclear &ea%ons 8ut also to minimise the seriousness o6 militarist en9ea>ours .22 It ma'es the nuclear arms race seem the stu66 o6 ? ocular loc'er;room ri>alr)D 9en)ing its 9ea9l) conseHuences. ,er6a%s most im%ortantlyC seDualise3 meta%6ors are one o- t6e reasons t6at talk o- nuclear 3isarmament is so rea3ily 3ismisse3= E I6 9isarmament is emasculationD ho0 coul9 an) real man e>en consi9er itTF Nonet6elessC our o9erall im%ression is t6at t6e mo8ilisation o- seDualise3C masculine lan/ua/e an3 ima/ery is si/ni\cantly more mute3 in t6e "6ite ,a%er t6an -eminist critics &oul3 %er6a%s eD%ect. It seems t6at t6ere is a 3eli8erate a9oi3ance 6ere o- t6e more o89iously masculine ar/uments an3 seDual meta%6orsC suc6 as t6ose a8out %otency an3 %enetration. ,er6a%s t6is is unsur%risin/ -rom a /o9ernment t6at claims to 6a9e 8een more o%en to -eminist ar/uments t6an its %re3ecessors.2( 7lt6ou/6 it may not 8ran3is6 more o9ertly %6allic ima/eryC it seems to us t6at the go>ernment
has not 6ull) relinHuishe9 the masculine;co9e9 /restige an9 status that is associate9 0ith the celebration o6 Wre/o0er. 7lt6ou/6 t6e "6ite ,a%er eD%licitly 3enies t6isC a/ain %er6a%s 3ue to an a&areness o- t6e -eminist critiIueC ar/uin/ t6at E&e maintain our nuclear -orces as a means o- 3eterrin/ acts o- a//ression an3 not -or reasons o- statusCF2) its ac'no0le9gement o6 the s/ecial treatment a66or9e9 to nuclear 0ea/ons states in9icates there is still /ri9e in belonging to the club@ G:he P: recognises the *K-s status "along 0ith that o6 the *SD FranceD Russia an9 !hina# as a nuclear 0ea/on state.F
Link Nukes
46e tec6nostrate/ic 3iscourse o- nuclear &ea%ons eDclu3es all t6at is -eminine Duncanson an9 .schle 5 (Claire an3 Cat6erineC o- $3in8ur/6 an3 o- Strat6cly3eC Ne& ,olitical Science
30(!)C %. ''1)I0 Such blan9 9escri/tors as Gstoc'/ilesF an9 G9eterrent s)stemF bring us to t6e secon3 stran3 o- t6e -eminist critiIue o- t6e &ay in &6ic6 states talk a8out nuclear &ea%ons tec6nolo/y= the ten9enc) to use highl) GabstractD eu/hemistic an9 acron)m;ri99en language.F31 46is %oint &as 3e9elo%e3 8y Co6n in 6er &ork on S 3e-ence intellectualsC in &6ic6 s6e i3enti\e3 the 9e/lo)ment o6 terms such as Gcollateral 9amageDF G9amage limitation 0ea/onF an9 Gclean bombsF as %art o- a 3iscourse s6e la8elle3 Etechnostrategic.F32 Suc6 a 3iscourse lea>es out Gthe emotionalD the concreteC t6e %articularC human bo9ies an9 their >ulnerabilit)D human li>es an9 their sub?ecti>it)Kall o6 0hich are mar'e9 NasO 6eminine.F33 For a member o6 the 9e6ence communit) to s/ea' o6 such things 0oul9 mean the) ris' being 9iscre9ite9 an9 9isem/o0ere9 in the male; 9ominate9 0orl9 in 0hich the) o/erate. Con9erselyC ignoring such things hel/s 9e6ence intellectuals insulate themsel>es 6rom the realities an9 conseHuences o6 their 0or'. Interestin/lyC Co6n ar/ues t6at it is notC
ultimatelyC tec6nostrate/ic lan/ua/e t6at is mo8ilise3 to :usti-y nuclear &ea%ons an3 3ecisions a8out t6eir 3e%loyment an3 use. Rat6erC 3e-ence intellectuals an3 ot6ers rely -or t6is task on Emuc6 more %rimiti9e am8i/uous an3 contra3ictory aDiomsFM8y insistin/C -or eDam%leC on t6e im%ortance o- Een6ancin/ our 3eterrenceF an3 E%rotectin/ our 9ital interests.F39 7s Co6n %oints outC!0 suc6 aDioms (assertions o6 6act or /rinci/le that are ta'en as sel6;e>i9entC not reIuirin/ e9i3ence or eD%lanation)C 6ail to /ro>i9e groun9s 6or 9iscrimination bet0een 9i66erent 9e6ence s)stemsI moreo9er the) remo>e the nee9 6or eE/licit ?ustiWcation o6 the nee9 6or nuclear 0ea/ons in the 6irst /lace. 7 reliance on aDioms is %articularly e9i3ent in t6e "6ite ,a%er.!1 46ey inclu3e t6e -ollo&in/= E;or '0 years our in3e%en3ent nuclear 3eterrent 6as %ro9i3e3 t6e ultimate assurance o- our national securityFJ E"e 8elie9e t6at an in3e%en3ent >ritis6 nuclear 3eterrent is an essential %art o- our insurance a/ainst t6e uncertainties an3 risks o- t6e -utureF 7s Co6n %oints outC suc6 aEioms o/erate in Ga realm 0here gen9er is ?ust belo0 the sur6ace.F!! "6at s6e means 8y t6is is t6at t6e aDioms /ain t6eir cre9ence an9 Gemotional >alencesF because the) mobilise un9erl)ing assum/tions about the state an3 a8out security 0hich are su66use9 0ith /en3ere3C an3 s%eci\cally masculine imager)
&in' ( u'es
<bstract 9e/ictions o6 nuclear 0ar are inherentl) masculine in their use as ?usti6ication 6or the eEistence o6 nuclear 0ea/ons an9 securit) measures ( 6eminist-s 6ocus on in9i>i9ual e/istemologies is the onl) 0a) to brea' this c)cle !ohn an9 Ru99ic' % (CarolC Researc6er an3 4eac6er at .ar9ar3 0e3ical Si/nsC an3 SaraC aut6orC 7 ;eminist
$t6ical ,ers%ecti9e on "ea%ons o- 0ass 1estructionC 6tt%=//&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/co6nru33ick.%3-) ,A Se9eral anti5&ar -eminists ha>e 6ocuse9 less on the 0ea/ons themsel>esD an9 more on the 9iscourse through 0hich the 0ea/ons "an9 their use# are t6eoriBe3 an3 legitimate9. 46ey 6a9e &ritten a8out 8ot6 t6e seDual an3 3omestic meta%6ors t6at turn t6e min3#s eye to&ar3 t6e %leasant an3 -amiliarC rat6er t6an to&ar3 ima/es o- in3escri8a8le 3e9astation. :he) ha>e i9enti6ie9 in nuclear 9iscourse techniHues o6 9enial an9 conce/tual 6ragmentation. 46ey 6a9e em%6asiBe3 t6e &ays t6at the abstraction an9 eu/hemism o6 nuclear 9iscourse /rotect nuclear /lanners an9 /oliticians 6rom the grisl) realities behin9 their 0or9s. S%eakin/ /enerallyC anti&ar -eminists in9ite &omen an3 men to atten3 to t6e i3entitiesC emotions an3 3iscourses t6at allo& us to acce%t t6e %ossi8le use o- nuclear &ea%ons. 23 ,er6a%s t6e most /eneral -eminist concern is t6e &illin/ness o- intellectuals to talk5asusual a8out nuclear &ea%ons (or a8out any atrocity). <n9 this brings us bac' to the issue o6 the 6raming o- Uuestion 4&o. :he Huestion as it is /ose9 seems in some 0a)s similar to the abstractD 9istancing thin'ing that 0e ha>e criticize9 ( but in 0hich 0e also /artici/ate. 46ere is no mention o- t6e 6orrorC let alone a %ause to rest &it6 it. ,e mo>eC or are mo9e3C Iuickly to an abstract moral tone@ Gan) circumstancesF Gmight be morall) /ermissible....F an3 t6en to com%arisons. 78stract lan/ua/e an3 a %enc6ant -or 3istinctions are ty%ical o- %6iloso%6yC intrinsically uno8:ectiona8leC o-ten a %leasure . It is continuous abstraction 0hile s/ea'ing o6 actual or imagine9 horror that 9isturbs us. <bstract 9iscussion o6 0ar6are is both the tool an9 the /ri>ilege o6 those 0ho imagine themsel>es as the (%otential) users o6 0ea/ons. :he >ictimsC i- t6ey can s%eak at allC s/ea' Huite 9i66erentl)= 7n account o- a nuclear 8last#s e--ects 8y a S 3e-ense intellectual= GOou 6a9e to 6a9e &ays to maintain communications in aH nuclear en9ironmentC a situation 8oun3 to inclu3e $0, 8lackoutC 8rute -orce 3ama/e to systemsC a 6ea9y :ammin/ en9ironmentC an3 so on.2! <n account b) a 7iroshima sur>i>or@ .>er)thing &as 8lackC 6a3 9anis6e3 into t6e 8lack 3ustC 0as 9estro)e9. 4nl) the 6lames that 0ere beginning to lic' their 0a) u/ ha9 an) color. ;rom t6e 3ust t6at &as like a -o/C -i/ures 8e/an to loom u%C 8lackC 6airlessC -aceless. 46ey screame3 &it6 9oices t6at &ere no lon/er 6uman. :heir screams 9ro0ne9 out the groans rising e>er)0here 6rom the rubbleD groans that seeme9 to rise 6rom the >er) earth itsel6.2' It s6oul3 8ecome a%%arent t6enC t6at our concern a8out a8stract lan/ua/e is not only rele9ant to t6e framing o- Uuestion 4&oC 8ut to its content t6e :usti-ia8ility o- nuclear &ea%ons# use as &ell. It is easier to contem/late an9 G?usti6)F the use o6 nuclear 0ea/ons in the abstract language o6 9e6ense intellectuals than in the 9escri/ti>eD emotionall) resonant language o6 the >ictimI 6rom the /ers/ecti>e o6 the user rather than the >ictim. 7nti5 &ar -eminists note t6at 3etaile3C -ocal attention to t6e 6uman im%act o- &ea%ons# use is not only consi3ere3 out o- 8oun3s in securit) /ro6essionals- 9iscourseJ it is also delegitimated 8y its association &it6 t6e E-eminineCF &it6 insu--icient masculinityC as is e9i3ent in t6is eDcer%t o- an inter9ie& &it6 a %6ysicist= ESe9eral collea/ues an3 I 0ere 0or'ing on mo9eling counter6orce nuclear attac'sD tr)ing to get realistic estimates o6 the number o6 imme9iate 6atalities that 0oul9 result 6rom 9i66erent 9e/lo)ments. <t one /ointC &e re5 mo3ele3 a %articular attackC usin/ sli/6tly 3i--erent assum%tionsC an3 -oun3 t6at instea3 o- t6ere 8ein/ 3( million imme3iate -atalitiesC t6ere &oul3 only 8e 30 million. <n9 e>er)bo9) 0as sittin/ aroun3 no33in/C sa)ingD P4h )ehD that-s greatC only 30 millionC# &6en all o- a su33enC I 6ear3 &6at &e &ere sayin/. 7n3 I 8lurte3 outC R"aitC I#9e :ust 6ear3 6o& &e#re talkin/ 55 *nly 30 million] 4nl) %0 million human beings 'ille9 instantl)V# Silence -ell u%on t6e room. No8o3y sai3 a &or3. 46ey 3i3n#t e9en look at me. It &as a&-ul. I -elt like a &oman.F 7-ter tellin/ t6is story to one o- t6e aut6orsC t6e %6ysicist a33e3 t6at 6e &as care-ul to ne9er 8lurt out anyt6in/ in3icatin/ t6at 6e &as t6inkin/ a8out t6e 9ictims a/ain.2( ;ear o- -eelin/ like a &oman (or 8ein/ seen as unmanly) silently &orks to maintain t6e 8oun3aries o- a 3istance3C a8stract 3iscourseC an3 to sustain t6e tone o- Uuestion 4&o a tone &6ic6 in9ites us to t6ink a8stractlyC Eo8:ecti9elyF a8out "01 useC 0ithout /ausing 0ith human /articularitiesD /assions an9 su66ering.
&in' ( State
:he ontolog) o6 the State as a unitar) actor is hea>il) gen9ere9D an9 eEclu9es 6emininit) 6rom the actions o6 the State Duncanson an9 .schle 5 (Claire an3 Cat6erineC o- $3in8ur/6 an3 o- Strat6cly3eC Ne& ,olitical Science
30(!)C %. ''))I0
In t6e 3ominant Realist 9ie&C u%6el3 8y 8ot6 mainstream aca3emics an3 t6e ma:ority o- %olicy5makersC states are Gunitar) actors 0hose internal characteristicsC 8eyon3 an assessment o- t6eir relati9e ca%a8ilitiesD are not seen as necessar) 6or un9erstan9ing their >ulnerabilities or securit);enhancing beha>iour .F)0 46is assum%tion t6at states act as co6erent units 3ra&s its stren/t6 -rom t6eir treatment as Enotional %ersonsF in early mo3ern :uris%ru3ence.)1 Relate3lyC the state is un9erstoo9 to be in9e/en9entD signiWe9 b) the status o6 so>ereignt) C &6ic6 entails a claim not only to aut6ority &it6in a territory 8ut to in3e%en3ence -romC an3 le/al eIuality toC ot6er suc6 aut6orities. Realists 9o not 9istinguish bet0een the legal status o6 so>ereignt) an9 actual state /racticeJ t6ey assume t6at states are as in3e%en3ent -rom one anot6er as t6ey claim to 8e. 0oreo9erC like a %ersonC t6e state must 8e a8le to actMan3 act in %articular &ays . :he 6act o6 international anarch) (or lack o- o9erarc6in/ /o9ernment# is inter/rete9 b) realists as bringing 0ith it a Gsel6;hel/F s)stem in 0hich states cannot rely on ot6ers an3 must see' to 9e6en9 themsel>es or /erish. ;inallyC as 7lan Aames makes clearC t6e state -or Realists is a -un3amentally rational actor= 46e state is sai3 to 8e6a9e rationally 8ecause it is %icture3 as 8en3in/ its e--orts in a consistent an3 calculate3 &ay to&ar3s a clearly5esta8lis6e3 /oal. 7n3 it can 8e so 3e%icte3 8ecause it is a sin/le unit. :he
analog) is 0ith the sober an9 mature man 0ho gi>es care6ul thought to the achie>ement o6 his /ur/oses.)2 7s t6is Iuote in3icatesC the Realist state is a Gmanl) state.F)3 "e can see here the s)stematic mobilising o6 gen9ere9 9ichotomies such as acti>e//assi>eD in9e/en9ent/"inter#9e/en9entD an9 rational/irrationalD an9 the assum/tion that the state Wts 0ith the masculine si9e o6 the 9ichotomies.
Nee3less to sayC t6e mo3el o- rationality t6at Aames 3escri8es 6as 8een critiIue3 8y countless -eminist %6iloso%6ers. ,ro%onents o- t6is mo3el are accuse3 o- ne/lectin/ social conteDtC 8ot6 in terms o- t6e 3omestic la8our an3 relations6i%s t6at make t6e %rocesses orational 3ecision5makin/ %ossi8leC an3 in terms o- t6e conseIuences o- t6e rational 3ecisions ma3e. In a33itionC /ro/onents o6
this mo9el o6 rationalit) are criticise9 6or e>acuating emotional an9 ethical 9imensions o6 thoughtD historicall) gen9ere9 6eminineD as 6i/6li/6te3 in our 3iscussion a8o9e a8out t6e limitations o- tec6nostrate/ic 3iscourse. I6 Realism-s e/istemolog) (its un3erlyin/ conce%tion o- kno&le3/e) is gen9ere9D its ontolog) (its un3erlyin/ conce%tion a8out t6e sel- an3 a/ency) is eHuall) so. ;eminists &oul3 ar/ue t6at Aames#s analo/y com%arin/ t6e state to a man is not acci3ental 8ut intrinsic to 6o& t6e state is un3erstoo3= this is Gan eEclusionar) masculine mo9el o6 agenc) 9eri>e9 6rom a conteEt o6 uneHual gen9er relationsD 0here %rimarily 0omen-s c6il3 rearin/ an3 care5/i9in/ 0or' su//orts the 9e>elo/ment o6 autonomous male sel>es.F)' In or3er to a%%ear unitaryC acti9e an3 in3e%en3entC t6enC t6ese sel9es must
mask t6eir internal -racturesC t6e constraints an3 ten3encies to inertia t6at t6ey mi/6t -aceC an3 t6eir relations o- (inter)3e%en3ency on internal an3 eDternal ot6ers.
classi6ication o6 international con6lict as a threat to international /eace an9 securit) there6ore 0arranting the use o6 6orce as %ro9i3e3 -or un3er C6a%ter LII o- t6e N C6arter (uni9ersal con-lictV) as o%%ose3 to an internal
con-lict t6at is limite3 to a %articular area an3 3oes not %ose a t6reat to international %eace an3 security. It -ollo&s t6at 8etter %rotection is o--ere3 to %ersons in international con-licts as o%%ose3 to internal con-lict. 7rticle 2) o- the Fourth Gene>a !on>ention
/laces states un9er an obligation to /rotect 0omen in international arme9 con6lict Gagainst an) attac' on their honor C in %articular a/ainst ra%e C en-orce3 %rostitution C or any ot6er -orm o- in3ecent assault.F'( :his article is not /en3er sensiti9e 8ecause it rein6orces the notion o6 0omen as men-s /ro/ert)D rather than because the) constitute >iolence. ;eminists 6a9e criticiBe3 t6e use o- t6e &or3 %rotection as o%%ose3 to t6e %ro6i8ition.')
&in' ( IR
:he a66-s >ersion o6 IR uses 0omen to legitimize masculine actions o6 9omination an9 >iolence Pettman + (Aan Ain3yC 1irector o- "omen#s Stu3ies S 7N C >ro&n Aournal o- "orl3 7--airs 10(2)C
"inter/S%rin/ 200!C %. 90)I0
;eminists in IR routinely ask Iuestions t6at are not usually aske3 in t6e 3isci5 %line. 46ey also attem%t to listen to 9oices eDclu3e3 -rom IR#s e9i3ence an3 resources. In so 3oin/C -eminist res%onses 8rou/6t anot6er %o&er-ul 3imension lackin/ in muc6 mainstream IRC an3 in &estern rea35 in/s o- 9/11C 8y internationaliBin/ t6e account.3+ 7s a 3isci%lineC IR has long been *.S.;9ominate9D an9 there6ore sha/e9 b) *.S. strategic an9 global interests an9 attention .39 IR -eminists o-ten 3ra& on net&orks an3 a--ilia5 tions &it6 ot6er international -emi5 nistsC an3 %ay attention to &omen#s 9oices in transnational -orums an3 circuitsC reco/5 niBin/ t6at t6ese are al&ays %artialC an3 situate3C inclu3in/ -or many o- usC only com5 municatin/ in $n/lis6. 46ese links 6a9e &i3ene3 su8stantially t6rou/6 t6e emer/ence o- e5mail an3 t6e Internet as key tools in transnational -eminist an3 &omen#s or/aniB5 in/.
<l0a)s ac'no0le9ging the horror an9 loss o6 $/11D these 0ere /lace9 alongsi9e other 9rea96ul an9 >iolent losses to other /eo/le in other /laces. 46ese res%onses also reclaime3 t6e international i3entity o- 9/11C re:ectin/ t6e a%%ro%riation o- t6e tra/e3y as only E7mericanCF t6at i/nore3 t6e many ot6er nationalities amon/ t6e 9ictims. Suc6 mo>esD meant to com/licateD internationalizeD an9 gen9er the accountD re; late to long;hel9 6eminist anEieties about the Gunitar) masculine actorF /roblem in IR that Gturns a com/leE state an9 set o6 6orces into a singular male o//onent.F!0 :his /ersoni6ication o6 enem) states ma'es their 9emonization easier. It also 6acilitates <merica-s translation into >ictim/re9eemer C re%ro3ucin/ 8oun3e3 state i3entities t6at su%%resse3 connections across an3 3i9isions &it6in t6e 3i--erent %layer states. Such constructions unleashe9 com/etiti>e masculinities into action@ hence the Phar9 mascu; linit)- /ri>ilege9 in the 9ominant national/alliance mo9e.!1 ;eminists resiste3 t6e &ays t6at $/11 an9 its a6termath %ri9ile/e3 t6e military solution an3 9e/lo)e9 P0omenin the 0ar stor) as a metho9 o6 legitimization. ;eminists %ointe3 to the use o6 0omen in the culture 0ars t6at lurke3 &it6in t6e &ar talkC an3 shore9 u/ the binar) :hem >s. *s )et again.!2 46ey also resiste3 t6e e--ect omasculiniBe3 res%onses in remo9in/ &omen as a/ents o- kno&le3/e. 46is in turn %rom%te3 t6e constant reassertion Rnot in our nameC# lest &omen#s %li/6t/3an/er 8ecame /roun3s -or masculiniBe3 action yet a/ain.
national;securit) /olicies are o-ten legitimate9 b) a//ealing to masculine characteristicsC such as /o0er an3 sel-56el%C mean t6at certain ty%es o- -orei/n5%olicy 8e6a9iorsMstan3in/ tallC rat6er t6an &im%in/ outM are seen as more le/itimate t6an ot6ersV Coul3 it 8e t6at men &6oC in the role o6 9e6ense eE/ertsD must em/lo) tough GmasculineF language an9 su//ress an) G6eminize9F thoughts 0hen constructing strategic o/tionsD come to re/ar3 more coo%erati9e c6oices as unt6inka8le an3 co o%erati9e 8e6a9ior as unlikelyV'+ Carol Co6n claims t6at the language 0e use sha/es the 0a) 0e >ie0 the 0orl9 an9 thus ho0 0e act on it. .er anal)sis o6 the language o6 *.S. securit) eE/ertsC &6ose i3eas 6a9e 8een im%ortant -or mainstream security stu3iesC suggests that this masculine;gen9ere9 9iscourse is the onl) /ermissible 0a) o6 s/ea'ing about national securit) i6 one is to be ta'en seriousl) b) the strategic communit) . 46is rationalD 9isembo9ie9 language /reclu9es 9iscussion o6 t6e 3eat6 an3 3estruction o- 0arC issues that can be s/o'en o6 onl) in emotional terms stereoty%ically associate9 0ith 0omen. In ot6er &or3sC t6e limits on 0hat can be sai9 0ith the language o6 strategic 9iscourse constrains our abilit) to thin' 6ull) an9 0ell about national securit). In t6eir analysis o- *.S. /olic) on bombing In9ochina 9uring the Uietnam,arC Aenni-er 0illiken an3 1a9i3 Syl9an eDamine t6e 3iscourse o- .S. %olicymakers. 46ey claim it 0as gen9ere9.'9 "6en %olicymakers s%oke or &rote a8out Sout6 LietnamD it 0as /ortra)e9 as 0ea' an9 6eminize9D its /o/ulation as h)sterical an9 chil9li'eJ t6e Nort6 LietnameseC on t6e ot6er 6an3C &ere c6aracteriBe3 as 8rutal -anaticsMas mani-estin/ a %er9erte3 -orm o- masculinity. 46e aut6ors claim t6at 8om8in/ %olicyC res%on3in/ to t6ese /en3ere3 %ortrayalsC &as 3i--erent in eac6 case. "6ile not 3enyin/ t6e reality o- &6at %olicymakers 3oC 0illiken an3 Syl9anC like Co6nC claim t6at 0or9s ha>e /o0er an9D there6oreD conseHuencesI the 0a) in 0hich /olic)ma'ers an9 scholars construct realit) has an e66ect on ho0 the) act u/on an9 eE/lain that realit). 2en3er53i--erentiate3 ima/es are o-ten use3 in -orei/n %olicy to le/itimate certain o%tions an3 3iscre3it ot6ers. 46ere-oreC "alt#s as%iration -or se%aratin/ t6e E%oliticalF -rom t6e Escienti-icF is Iuestiona8le. In ot6er &or3sC theories cannot be se/arate9 6rom /olitical /ractice.
i9entities that ren9er them intractable an9 o6ten incom/rehensible . Ne&ly articulate3 Nort6/Sout6 8oun3aries 8et&een mature an3 immature anarc6ies rein-orce t6ese 3istinctions. <narch)C or t6e state onatureC is not only a meta%6or -or t6e &ay in &6ic6 %eo%le or states can 8e eD%ecte3 to 8e6a9e in t6e a8sence o- /o9ernmentJ it also 9e/icts an untame9 natural en>ironment in nee9 o6 ci>ilization 0hose 0i9e an9 chaotic s/aces are o6ten 9escribe9 as 6emale. Such language 0as -reIuently use9 3urin/ t6e ei/6teent6 an3 nineteent6 centuries to legitimate colonial rule o9er %eo%les &6o &ere 3eeme3 inca%a8le o- /o9ernin/ t6emsel9es.(3 It is not onl) threats 6rom outsi9e against 0hich nationalist i9eologies are create9. :he threats that states /ose to their o0n citizensC issues o- im%ortance on t6e ne& security a/en3aC are o6ten eEacerbate9 b) the mani/ulation o6 nationalist i9eologies t6at %its rulin/ /rou%s a/ainst Eoutsi3ersF &it6in t6eir o&n territory. ;reIuentlyC the reassertion o6 cultural or reli/ious i9entitiesC in t6e name onational unityC ma) ta'e the 6orm o6 re/ressi>e measures against 0omen. Nira Ou9al51a9is su//ests t6at t6e
3e-inin/ o- &omen as t6e 8earers o- cultureMa %ractice t6at o-ten accom%anies t6ese mo9ementsM rein-orces &omen#s ineIuality. "6en /en3er relations come to 8e seen as t6e EessenceF o- cultureC &omen &6o stray outsi3e t6e 3e-inition o- E/oo3 &omenF can 8e %unis6e3 -or 8rin/in/ s6ame to t6eir -amiliesJ 8esi3es soli3i-yin/ et6nic i3entitiesC t6is can 8e use3 as a &ay o- le/itimiBin/ t6e control an3 o%%ression o- &omen.(! Suc6 8e6a9ior is illustrate3 in t6e &ay &omen 6a9e 8een re/ulate3 8y t6e 4ali8an in 7-/6anistan.
ational i9entities are o6ten use9 b) 9omestic elites to /romote state or grou/ interests an9 hi9e race an9 class 9i>isions. 1e-inin/ moments in collecti9e 6istorical memories are -reIuently &ars o- national li8erationC /reat 9ictories
in 8attles a/ainst eDternal enemiesC or t6e /lories o- -ormer im%erialist eD%ansion. ;la/s an3 national ant6ems are o-ten associate3 &it6 &ar. Sc6olars &6o stu3y nationalism 6a9e em%6asiBe3 t6e im%ortance o- &ar-are -or t6e creation o- a sense o- national community. Not only 3oes &ar mo8iliBe t6e national consciousnessC it also %ro9i3es t6e myt6s an3 memories t6at create a sense o- national i3entityC an i3entity -or &6ic6 %eo%le 6a9e 8een &illin/ to 3ie an3 kill.(' 7s Aean $ls6tain assertsC societies areC in some senseC t6e Esum totalF ot6eir &ar stories.(("ar stories are o-ten use3 to /ain a society#s su%%ort -or a &arJ -reIuently C these stories rel) on the /ortra)al o6 a certain 'in9 o6 masculinit) associate9 0ith heroism an9 strength . 46ese %ortrayals can 8e racialiBe3 as &ell as /en3ere3J as Susan Ae--or3s notesC all t6e 6eroes in .olly&oo3#s 19+0s Lietnam "ar an3 action5a39enture -ilms &ere &6ite men.() Rarely 3o &ar stories inclu3e stories a8out &omen.
===Im/acts===
Im/act ( ,ar
8asculine a//roaches to 6oreign /olic) to lea9 narro0;min9e9 solutions an9 0ar. :ic'ner % (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC %!e &rown 'ournal of World ffairsC 10(2)C
%. '!) A0 So to /et 8ack to your IuestionC yesC I 3o t6ink t6at the 0ar in IraH is a masculine a//roach. :he em/hasis on a strong militar) res/onse closes o66 other more conciliator) o/tions . 46is is not t6e same t6in/ as sayin/ t6at men al&ays -a9or t6e use o- -orce &6ile &omen al&ays -a9or more %eace-ul res%onses. ,omen su//orte9 this 0arD tooD although there 0as a si/ni-icant gen9er ga/ on t6e issueC at least until t6e &ar starte3. "6at I am sayin/ t6at 0e are all socialize9 into regar9ing masculine norms as the correct 0a) to o/erateK/articularl) in matters o6 6oreign /olic). :his has the negati>e e66ect o6 shutting o66 other o/tions. 7n3 t6e 6raming o- the 0ar on terrorism as goo9 >ersus e>il re6lects t6e kin3 o9ichotomous thin'ing t6at 6eminists 6in9 3ee%ly /roblematicC as I 6a9e illustrate3 &it6 my 3e-inition o/en3er. ;eminists 6a9e &ritten a /reat 3eal a8out t6e 3an/ers o- eit6er/or cate/oriBations an3 t6e tolerance -or am8i/uityC 8ot6 o- &6ic6 coul3 8e use-ul 6ere.
:he hegemonic masculinit) /er/etuate9 b) the a66 ?usti6ies militar) a9>enturismD turning the case. :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. !9) A0 Claimin/ t6at t6e security5seekin/ 8e6a9ior o- states is 3escri8e3 in /en3ere3 termsC 6eminists ha>e /ointe9 to the masculinit) o6 strategic 9iscourse an9 ho0 this ma) im/act on un9erstan9ing o6 an9 /rescri/tions 6or securit)J it ma) also 6el% to eE/lain 0h) 0omen-s >oices ha>e so o-ten been seen as inauthentic in matters o- national securit). ;eminists 6a9e eDamine3 6o& states legitimate their securit); see'ing beha>ior through a//eals to t)/es o6 GhegemonicF masculinit). 46ey are also in9esti/atin/ t6e eDtent to &6ic6 state an3 national i3entitiesC &6ic6 can lea3 to con-lictC are 8ase3 on /en3ere3 constructions. :he >alorization o6 0ar through its i9enti6ication 0ith a heroic 'in9 o6 masculinit) 9e/en9s on a 6eminize9D 9e>alue9 notion o6 /eace seen as unattainable an9 unrealistic . Since -eminists 8elie9e t6at /en3er is a 9aria8le social constructionC t6ey claim t6at t6ere is not6in/ ine9ita8le a8out t6ese /en3ere3 3istinctionsJ t6usC t6eir analyses o-ten inclu3e t6e emanci%atory /oal o- %ostulatin/ a 3i--erent 3e-inition osecurity less 3e%en3ent on 8inary an3 uneIual /en3er 6ierarc6ies.
Im/act ; &iberalism
&iberalism allo0s 6or a /atriarchal macroeconomic s)stem 0hich 9is/ro/ortionatel) hurts 0omen an9 /re>ents gen9er eHualit) Ruiz 3 (4riciaC La& S "as6C *ct. 1' 200)C 6onors.csustan.e3u/:ournals/Soun3in/s/RuiB.%3-)I0
Feminist critiHues o6 liberalism a99ress the economic ineHualities inherent to 6ree tra9eD 0hich 9is/ro/ortionatel) a66ect 0omen. AacIui 4rue ar/ues t6at Emale;centere9 macroeconomic in9icatorsD such as the Gross ational Pro9uctF un9er>alue the 0or' o6 0omen.1+ 4rue also re%orts t6at Eon a &orl3 scaleC 0omen are a 9isa9>antage9 grou/= t6ey o&n one %er cent o- t6e &orl3#s %ro%erty an9 resourcesC /er6orm siEt) /er cent o6 the labourC Gan3H are t6e ma:ority o- re-u/eesC illiterate an3 %oor %ersons.F (I8i3) 46is su//ests t6at the ca/italist structure is a /atriarchal oneD e66ecti>el) marginalizing the /artici/ation an9 contributions o6 0omen in the econom)C since muc6 o- t6eir &ork is re-lecte3 in un%ai3 ille/al or 3omestic settin/s t6at are not inclu3e3 in economic assessments. In3ee3D liberalist institutions suc6 as t6e "4* an3 multinational cor%orations ha>e ten3e3 to create -ree tra3e a/reements t6at &eaken state %rotections on la8or ri/6ts19 an3 %u8lic social -un3sC &6ic6 6as ser>e9 to negati>el) a66ect the large /ro/ortion o6 0omen in the labor 6orce. :his in turn camou-la/es issues o6 6emale eE/loitationD such as t6e /en3ere3 3i9ision o- la8or an3 the increase in seE tra66ic'ing 0orl90i9e. ;eminists also c6allen/e li8eralism#s
claim t6at international institutions %ro9i3e -or &ays in &6ic6 &omen can 8e 8ecome more %olitically an3 socially ackno&le3/e3 an3 em%o&ere3. Since the lea9ers an9 the /rocesses o6 6ormal international organizations come 6rom /atriarchal s)stemsD their 0or' can 'ee/ 0omen at a 9isa9>antage. .ilary C6arles&ort6 critiIues some o- t6e recent -ormal international con-erencesC suc6 as t6e >ei:in/ 1eclaration an3 7/en3a 21 in Rio. S6e notes t6at t6e &or3in/ in t6e 3ocuments s6o&s t6at 0hile some consensus 0as achie>e9 in /rogressing issues critical to 0omenD not enough 0as achie>e9 to arri>e at t6e real changes %ro%ose3 8y -eminists. C6arles&ort6 outlines some o- t6e 3isa%%ointin/ resultsC suc6 as the lac' o6 agreement on the 9e6inition o6 gen9erD an9 inabilit) to secure benchmar's 6or measuring /rogress.20 Suc6 critiIues un3erscore t6e c6allen/es o- -eminist t6eoryC 8ecause t6ey
in9icate that highl) /ublicize9 an9 0i9el) su//orte9 liberalist 0omen-s mo>ements 9o not necessaril) eHuate 0ith t6e /oal o- ac6ie9in/ real gen9er eHualit).
,ar is the /ro9uct o6 the gen9ere9 un9erstan9ings o6 li6eKun9erstan9ings o6 the celebrate9 masculine an9 the subor9inate9 6eminineKthat ha>e been 6ashione9 o>er 9ast tracts o- cultural time. 7n3 since 0ar arises 6rom human;create9 un9erstan9ings an9 /ractices it can be remo>e9 0hen these un9erstan9ings change. ,ar is not insu/erable. In3ee3C t6e rootin/ o- &ar in 6uman create3 %6enomena is reco/niBe3 as
a res%onse to t6e %olitical inca%acitation associate3 &it6 8iolo/ically 3eterminist ar/uments= K7ttem%ts o- /enetic 3eterminists to s6o& a 8iolo/ical 8asis -or in3i9i3ual a//ression an3 to link t6is to social a//ressionC are not only unscienti-icC 8ut t6ey su%%ort t6e i3ea t6at &ars o- conIuest 8et&een nations are ine9ita8le.K+
Patriarch) is the root cause o6 0arD 0hich in turn recreates /atriarch) ,or'man $2 (46omC ,oli Sci S o- Ne& >runs&ickC OCISS ,a%er no. 31C %. )C Aanuary 199(C
6tt%=//&&&.yorku.ca/yciss/%u8lications/*,315"orkman.%3-)I0 :he /ractices o6 0ar emerge 0ithin gen9ere9 un9erstan9ings that in6lect all s/heres o6 social li6e.
7s &e create3 KmanK an3 K&omanK &e simultaneously create3 &ar. Contem%orary &ar-areC in com%lementary termsC emer/es &it6in t6e inner5 most sanctums o- /en3ere3 li-e. Gen9er constructs are constituti>e o6 0arI the) 9ri>e it an9 imbue it 0ith meaning an9 sense. "ar s6oul3 not 8e un3erstoo3 as sim%ly 3eri9ati9e o- t6e masculine et6osC alt6ou/6 it numerous -acets accor3 &it6 t6e narrati9es an3 lore o- masculinity. :he 6acult) o6 0ar is our un9erstan9ing o6 man an9 0omen C omanliness an3 &omanlinessC an9 /articularl) o6 the subor9ination o6 the 6eminine to the masculine . It is t6e t&innin/ o- t6e masculine an3 t6e -eminine t6at nouris6es t6e &ar et6ic. 46is can 8e illustrate3 8y eDaminin/ t6e in-usion o- t6e lan/ua/e o- &ar &it6 6eteroseDual ima/ery ty%ically o- %atriarc6yC t6at isC &it6 i3eas o- t6e %ro&ess5la3en male seDual su8:ect conIuerin/ t6e ser9ile -emale seDual o8:ect. Aoth seE an9 0ar are constitute9 through un9erstan9ings o6 male
9omination an9 6emale subor9ination. :he language is boun9 to be mutuall) rein6orcing an9 easil) interchangeable. "ar is a meta%6or -or seD an3 seD is a meta%6or -or &ar. 7 recent stu3y o- nicknames -or t6e %enis re9eale3 t6at
men &ere muc6 more incline3 to meta%6oriBe t6e %enis &it6 re-erence to myt6ic or le/en3ary c6aracters (suc6 as t6e .ulkC Cyclo%sC 2en/6is <6anC 46e Lone Ran/erC an3 0ac t6e <ni-e)C to aut6ority -i/ures an3 sym8ols (suc6 as Carnal <in/C 6ammer o- t6e /o3sC your 0a:estyC Ro3 o- Lor3s6i%C an3 t6e %ersua3er)C to a//ressi9e tools (suc6 as scre&3ri9erC 3rillC :ack6ammerC c6iselC 6e3/etrimmerC an3 -uBB8uster)C to ra9enin/ 8easts (suc6 as 8east o- 8ur3enC <in/ <on/C 46e 1ra/onC %yt6onC co8raC an3 anacon3a)C an3 to &ea%onry (suc6 as lo9e %istolC %assion ri-leC %ink tor%e3oC meat s%earC stealt6 8om8erC 3estroyerC an3 %ur%le 6elmete3 lo9e &arrior).11 :he
intuiti>e collocation o6 seEualit) 0ith 9ominationD conHueringD 9estructionD an9 es/eciall) instruments o6 0ar is con6irme9 8y t6is stu3y. Aoth seE an9 0arC 6o&e9erC are mani6estations o6 the gen9ere9 notions o6 /o0er;o>erD submissionD ineHualit)D in?ur)D contaminationD an9 9estruction. Aoth /ractices are integral eE/ressions o6 /atriarchal culture an9 /roEimate to its re/ro9uction. It is 6ar3ly sur%risin/ t6at the language o6 seEualit) an9 0ar is seamless.
Patriarch) is the root cause o6 0ar ,or'man $2 (46omC ,oli Sci S o- Ne& >runs&ickC OCISS ,a%er no. 31C %. 9C Aanuary 199(C
6tt%=//&&&.yorku.ca/yciss/%u8lications/*,315"orkman.%3-)I0 46ese moti-s s6a3e into outri/6t loat6in/. ,ar may 8e 6ell in3ee3J 8ut it is 9ri>en b) an i9eolog) o6 hatre9. 8isog)n) is the theor)I 0ar is the /ractice. 0yt6s surroun3in/ &oman as t6e enemy o- man (an3 t6e t6in/s men 3o) lay at t6e 6eart o&ar5t6ou/6t. 0o3ern &ar is connotati9ely inse%ara8le -rom t6e 3e6umaniBin/ re%resentations o- &oman. :he 9ri>e Jto 0arJ is recesse9 0ithin the m)th o6 0oman as manSs 0orst enem). 0o3ern &ar-are is a relentlessly ,an3oran a--air. Its
a8un3ant coital ima/ery is or/anically ins%ire3 8y its myso/ynistic cra3le. Common %arlance routinely asserts t6at an enemy t6at 6as 8een consi/ne3 to i/nominious 3e-eat is an enemy t6at 6as 8een Kt6orou/6ly -ucke3K (&6ic6 resonates culturally as 8ein/ re3uce3 to a &oman). It 6as 8een o8ser9e3 t6at the construction o6 a sol9ier reHuires the 'illing o6 the 0oman 0ithin .1) 46e trainin/ o- t6e sol3ier is re%lete &it6 a litany o- 3isci%linin/ e%it6ets re/ar3in/ t6e -eminine. 46e trans-ormation -rom 8oy5recruit into man5sol3ier reIuires t6e eDtir%ation o- any -eminine traits an3 i3entitiesJ it 3eman3s t6e 9anIuis6in/ o- any lurkin/ &omanliness. ,ar is 6emici9al. 46is -ores6a3o&sC moreo9erC t6e 9i/ilance &it6 res%ect to t6e su89ersi9e -eminine 8ein/ loomin/ &it6in t6e &arrin/ -a8ric. Sol3ier an3 %olicymakers /uar3 a/ainst t6e association o- t6eir actions or i3eas &it6 -eminine traits. Re/ar3less o- its %articular mani-estation or 3e-inition o- a %racticeC ritualC or /oal linke3 to militaries an3 to 8attleC the i9eolog) o6 0ar reHuires a strictD unrelenting o>ercoming o6 an)thing un9erstoo9 as 0omanl). Its 3iscourse o- i3entity an3 ac6ie9ementD in other
0or9sD re/u9iates an9 9isa>o0s the 6eminine as much as it is embraces the masculine. :his m)sog)nistic re6leE un9ergir9s the re/resentation o6 o//onents (on t6e &ar -ront an3 t6e K6omeK -ront) as &omen.
46ose o%%osin/ &ar routinely are 3ismisse3 in -eminine termsC as 8ein/ too emotionalC too sentimentalC as lackin/ in -irmness an3 3eterminationC as na_9eC unt6ou/6t-ulC &eakC con-use3C an3C in t6e 8ran3in/ cou% 3e /r`ceC as unmanly (it is commonly sus%ecte3 t6at %eace-ul %eo%le or 3o9esC a-ter allC 3onNt K6a9e 8allsK). 46ere is a common an3 essential association 8et&een &omen an3 %eaceC an association t6at 6as %ermeate3 a s6are o- social acti9ism an3 sc6olarly researc6. 0ilitary enemiesC moreo9erC ty%ically are re%resente3 as &oman. 0ilitary tar/etsC es%ecially t6e /roun3 or eart6 itsel-C also are connotati9ely -eminiBe3 in &ar5t6ink. :he /ractice o6 0ar
sur6aces 0ithin gen9ere9 un9erstan9ings an9 i9entities. ,ar embo9ies the rehearsal o6 /atriarchal consciousness. Numerous lea3ers (mainly male 8ut occasionally -emale) o9ertly 3ra& u%on /en3ere3 un3erstan3in/s -or %olicy
/ui3ance. It is t6is sense o- &ar 8ein/ constitute3 an3 in-lecte3 t6rou/6 /en3er t6at in-orms t6e claim t6at %atriarc6y lies at t6e root o&ar. ,ithout gen9er it is unli'el) that 0ar 0oul9 arise as such a 6reHuent alternati>e in human li6eD
an9 that entire societies coul9 be so eEtensi>el) militarize9 regar9less o6 the costs an9 tra9e;o66s in>ol>e9.
Patriarch) is the root cause o6 militarism an9 the commo9i6ication o6 0omen P!P 2 (,eo%le#s C6arter -or ,eaceC Aune 1' 200(C &&&.net&orkers.or//user-iles/,eaceP20C6arter.%3-)I0
46e links 8et&een %atriarc6y an3 &ar nee3 to 8e em%6asiBe3. :he >er) structure o6 the militar) is /atriarchal. :o gal>anize to -ull %otential the struggle against militarismD its gen9er;base9 a//roach has to be challenge9 . Since t6e 9ery 8e/innin/ o- &arC 0omen ha>e been consi9ere9 s/oils o6 0ar an9D as >ictims C are to3ay su8sume3 un9er the eu%6emistic /hrase Jcollateral 9amageJ. 46e "ar on 4error intert&ine3 &it6 neo5li8eral /lo8aliBation 6as intensi-ie3 eD%loitation an3 o%%ression o- &omenD commo9i6)ing themD tra66ic'ing themD an9 t6us s)stematicall) >iolating their 9ignit). 46e main casualties o- &ar are &omen an3 c6il3ren. 46e economic conseIuences o- &ar are eDacer8ate3 8y %atriarc6y. 8ilitarization rein6orces the seEual commo9i6ication o6 0omen. It also
/er/etuates seEual >iolence against 0omen. 8ilitar) occu/ation 6urther 9egra9es 0omen.
===<lternati>e===
<lt ( .thnogra/h)
<lt is to con9uct our anal)sis o6 international relations in a manner consistent 0ith ethnogra/h). :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. ''5')) A0 7nt6ro%olo/ist Cli--or3 2eertB 6as 3escri8e3 ethnogra/h) as Ea strati-ie3 6ierarc6y o- meanin/-ul structures in terms o- &6ic6 6uman actions are %ro3uce3C %ercei9e3 an3 inter%rete3 an3 &it6out &6ic6 t6ey &oul3 not eDist.F3! It is not an eD%erimental science in searc6 o- la&C 8ut an inter/reti>e one in search o6 meaningI its tas' is to unco>er the conce/tual structures an9 meanings that in6orm sub?ects- acts. 2eertB s%eaks o- an
inter%reti9e a%%roac6 as an ai3 to /ainin/ access to t6e conce%tual &orl3 in &6ic6 our su8:ects li9e so t6at &e can con9erse &it6 t6em.3' "ritin/ a8out t6e natural sciences rat6er t6an t6e social sciencesC $9elyn ;oD <eller 3escri8es t6e met6o3 use3 8y 8iolo/ist >ar8ara 0cClintock in a similar 9ein. S6e contrasts 0cClintock#s 0or' on /enetic trans%osition in corn &it6 t6at more ty%ical o- mo3ern scienceC &6ic6 is /remise9 on a 9i>ision bet0een the obser>er an9 the obser>e9 an3 t6e searc6 -or a sin/le
la& o- eD%lanationC a met6o3olo/y t6at encourages researchers to o>erloo' 9i66erence. !laiming that Gthere-s no such thing as a central 9ogma into 0hich e>er)thing 0ill 6itDF 8c!lintoc' tal'e9 o6 her scienti6ic in>estigations in terms o6 Glistening to the materialF or Gletting the eE/eriment tell )ou 0hat to 9o.F3( In 3escri8in/ 6er Econ9ersationalF relations6i% &it6 %lantsC 8c!lintoc' urge9 res/ect 6or 9i66erenceJ s6e use3 t6e &or3s a--ection an3 em%at6y to 3escri8e 6er -orm o- t6ou/6t.3) "6ile <eller is
care-ul not to conclu3e t6at 0cClintock &as consciously 3oin/ -eminist scienceC s6e 3oes su//est t6atC 8ein/ a &oman &it6 a commitment to %ersonal inte/rityC 0cClintock 6a3 to insist on a 3i--erent meanin/ o- min3C natureC an3 t6e relation 8et&een t6em.3+ In ot6er &or3sC /i9en t6at t6e meanin/ o- t6ese terms an3 t6eir relation to eac6 ot6er 3e%en3 on /en3ere3 constructionsC 8c!lintoc'-s
science reHuire9 a 9i66erent construction o6 gen9er. .m/ath)D listeningD an9 con>ersation are 0or9s 6reHuentl) use9 b) IR 6eminists 0hen 9escribing their research. C6ristine Syl9ester 6as use3 t6e term em%at6etic
coo%eration in connection &it6 6er -iel3&ork amon/ &omen in ^im8a8&e. S6e 3e-ines em%at6etic coo%eration as t6e %ositional sli%%a/e t6at occurs &6en one listens seriously to concerns an3 a/en3as o- t6ose to &6om &e 3o not usually listen &6en 8uil3in/ social t6eory. Uuotin/ 4rin6 0in656aC Syl9ester claims t6at em%at6y in9ol9es takin/ on t6e stru//les o- ot6ers 8y listenin/ to &6at t6ey 6a9e to say in a con9ersational style t6at 3oes not %us6 or 3irectJ it is an a8ility to in9esti/ate Iuestions in &ays t6at o%en us u% to t6e stories t6at 6a9e /enerally 8een 8y%asse3.39 !oo/eration is Ga /rocess o6 negotiation that "real# theorists ?oin because the)
ha>e ta'en on boar9 enough o6 the teEture o6 marginalise9 i9entities that their Sel6;i9entit) 0ith canonical 'no0le9ge is 9isturbe9.F!0 SimilarlyC <at6arine 0oonC an IR -eminist 3oin/ secon35/eneration em%irical &orkC
6as 3escri8e3 6er -iel3&ork in <orea as an attem%t to li-t t6e curtains o- in9isi8ility t6at 6a9e s6rou3e3 <orean %rostitutes# eDistence. In-luence3 8y t6e &ork o- $nloeC 8oon-s stories hel/ us locate 0omen in /laces not normall) consi9ere9
rele>ant to IR an9 to lin' their eE/eriences to 0i9er /rocesses an9 structures that she in>estigate9 through the eEamination o6 national;securit) 9ocuments collecte9 in the *nite9 States an9 Korea. 0oon
o--ers 6er researc6 as a %assa/e&ay -or t6e 9oices o- t6ese &omen &6o &ere -ar -rom silent &6en s6e en/a/e3 t6em in con9ersation on to%ics t6at ran/e3 -rom %olitics to c6il35rearin/ 6a8its.!1 She claims that man) o6 the thoughts an9 eE/eriences 6ormer /rostitutes share9 0ith her in regular con>ersations in6orme9 her thin'ing an9 0riting .!2 .er inter9ie&s are not inten3e3 to o--er statistical e9i3ence 8ut Eto /i9e 9oice to %eo%le &6o most <oreans an3 7mericans 6a9e ne9er consi3ere3 as 6a9in/ anyt6in/ im%ortant to say or &ort6 listenin/ to.F!3 C6ristine C6in#s &ork also res%on3s to t6e IuestionC "6ere are t6e &omenV C6in %resents 6er -iel3&ork &it6 3omestic ser9ants in 0alaysia in a li/6t similar to 0oon#s. Describing her
ethnogra/hic researchM&6ic6 in9ol9e3 li9in/ in 9arious nei/68or6oo3s in <uala Lum%urC 0alaysiaC o9er a siD5mont6 %erio3C sheC tooC re?ects the sur>e) metho9D 0hich in !hin-s >ie0 o>ersim/li6ies com/leEities o6 li6e that cannot be 9istille9 in a series o6 h)/otheses to be teste9. S6e 3escri8es 6er &ork as multimet6o3
et6no/ra%6ic researc6= s6e o--ers Iuotations -rom -iel3 notes t6atC s6e saysC are a Some ,at6&ays -or IR ;eminist ;utures 1!3 style oe9i3ence t6at allo&s 6er su8:ects to use t6eir o&n &or3s an3 s%eak a8out any issue t6ey %lease. C6in &rites a8out 6er e--orts to esta8lis6 trust an3 3escri8es 6er analysis o- 6er inter9ie&s as a stu3y o- narrati9ityC or 6o& &e come to construct our i3entities 8y locatin/ oursel9es &it6in our li-e stories.!! arrati>e is a metho9 sometimes em/lo)e9 b) 6eminists to 6urther their goal
o6 constructing 'no0le9ge that comes out o6 /eo/le-s e>er)9a) eE/eriences . Such 'no0le9ge is im/ortant 6or reaching a le>el o6 sel6un9erstan9ing that can enable /eo/le to com/rehen9 the hierarchical structures o6 ineHualit) or o//ression &it6in &6ic6 t6eir li9es are situate3C an3 t6ere8y mo9e to&ar3
o9ercomin/ t6em. Laurel Ric6ar3sonC a -eminist sociolo/istC 6as claime3 t6at narrati9es are Iuintessential to un3erstan3in/ t6e sociolo/ical. S6e outlines some o- t6e conseIuences o- a3o%tin/ a narrati9e -orm as a &ay o- acIuirin/ an3 re%resentin/ kno&le3/eC su//estin/ t6at it can em%o&er in3i9i3uals an3 su%%ort trans-ormati9e social %ro:ects. Narrati9es 3is%lay t6e /oals an3 intentions o6uman actors an3 are t6e %rimary &ay t6at in3i9i3uals or/aniBe t6eir eD%erience into tem%orally meanin/-ul e%iso3esJ narrati9es make t6e connections 8et&een e9ents t6at constitute meanin/. $D%lanation in a narrati9e mo3e is conteDtually em8e33e3C &6ereas scienti-ic eD%lanation is a8stracte3 -rom s%atial an3 tem%oral conteDts.!' Ric6ar3son 3escri8es narrati9es t6at /i9e 9oice to t6ose social /rou%s &6o are mar/inaliBe3Mto &6at s6e calls t6e Ecollecti9e story.F "6ile %eo%le talk o- s%eci-ic e9ents rat6er t6an articulatin/ 6o&
./istemolog) First
Uie0 their claims as sus/ect ( realist 'no0le9ge has been sha/e9 b) masculine e/istemolog). :ic'ner $2 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gender in International (elations
)eminist Perspectives on c!ieving Global *ecurit+C %.1351!) SinceC as I 6a9e su//este3C t6e &orl3 o- international /olitics is a masculine 9omainC 6o& coul3 -eminist %ers%ecti9es contri8ute anyt6in/ ne& to its aca3emic 3iscoursesV 0any male sc6olars 6a9e alrea3y note3 t6atC gi>en our current technologies o6 9estruction an9 the high 9egree o6 economic ineHualit) an9 en>ironmental 9egra9ation t6at no& eDistsC 0e are 3es%erately in nee9 o- changes in the 0a) 0orl9 /olitics is con9ucte9J many o- t6em are attem%tin/ to %rescri8e suc6 c6an/es. ;or t6e most %artC 6o&e9erC t6ese critics 6a9e ignore9 the eEtent to 0hich the 9alues an3 assum/tions that 9ri>e our contem%orary international s)stem are intrinsicall) relate9 to conce/ts o6 masculinit)J %ri9ile/in/ t6ese 9alues constrains t6e o%tions a9aila8le to states an3 t6eir %olicymakers. 7ll 'no0le9ge is /artial an9 is a 6unction o6 the 'no0erSs li>e9 eE/erience in the 0orl9. Since 'no0le9ge about the beha>ior o6 states in t6e international system 9e/en9s on assum/tions that come out o6 menSs eE/eriencesD it ignores a large bo9) o6 human eE/erience that has the /otential 6or increasing the range o6 o/tions an9 o/ening u/ ne0 0a)s o6 thin'ing about interstate /ractices. 46eoretical %ers%ecti9es t6at 3e%en3 on a 8roa3er ran/e o6uman eD%erience are im%ortant -or &omen an3 men alikeC as &e seek ne& &ays o- t6inkin/ a8out our contem%orary 3ilemmas.
:o ma'e /rogress in human rights la0 the /ers/ecti>e o6 the sociall) sub?ugate9 must be ac'no0le9ge9 in /ublic 6orumsD such as 9ebate !harles0orth $+ (.illaryC La& S 7N C .uman Ri/6ts o- "omen National an3 International ,ers%ecti9esC %.
)(C &&&.ne&sc6ool.e3u/.../C6arles&ort6Q"6atP20areP20"omensP20InternationalP20 .uman P20Ri/6ts.%3-)I0 .o& can international 6uman ri/6ts la& tackle t6e o%%resse3 %osition o- &omen &orl3&i3eV ,omen-s international human rights must be 9e>elo/e9 on a number o6 6ronts. Certainly t6e rele9ance o- t6e tra3itional canon o- 6uman ri/6ts to
&omen is im%ortant to 3ocument. 46e instruments an3 institutions o- t6e E-irst &a9eF o- international la& &it6 res%ect to &omen must also 8e su%%orte3 an3 stren/t6ene3. 46e %otential o- an in3i9i3ual com%laints %roce3ure un3er t6e "omen#s Con9entionC -or eDam%leC s6oul3 8e seriously eD%lore3. 7t t6e same timeC rights that 6ocus on harms sustaine9 b) 0omen in /articular nee9
to be i9enti6ie9 an9 9e>elo/e9D challenging the /ublic//ri>ate 9istinction b) bringing rights 9iscourse into the /ri>ate s/here. >utC most 6un9amental an9 im/ortantD 0e must 0or' to ensure that 0omen-s >oices 6in9 a /ublic au9ienceD /erha/s in the conteEt o6 9ebates an9 9iscussions o>er international relationsD to reorient the boun9aries o6 mainstream human rights la0 so t6at it incor%orates an un3erstan3in/ ot6e &orl3 6rom the /ers/ecti>e o6 the sociall) sub?ugate9. *ne &ay -or&ar3 in international 6uman ri/6ts la& is to challenge the gen9ere9 9ichotom) o6 /ublic an9 /ri>ate 0orl9s.
===<:-s===
<:@ Perm
Perm 6ails ( /lan-s metho9ological an9 e/istemological a//roach to international relations is antithetical to that o6 6eminist IR theor). :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. 35') A0 It is t6is lack o- connection t6at moti9ates many o- t6e issues raise3 in t6is 8ook. "6ile I 6a9e attem%te3 to site -eminist %ers%ecti9es &it6in t6e 3isci%lineC it &ill 8ecome clear -rom t6e to%ics a33resse3 t6at IR 6eminists -reIuently ma'e 9i66erent assum/tions about the 0orl9D ask 3i--erent IuestionsC an9 use 9i66erent metho9ologies to ans&er t6em. .a9in/ re-lecte3 on reasons -or t6ese 3isconnectionsC as &ell as t6e misun3erstan3in/s o9er t6e %otential use-ulness o- -eminist a%%roac6es raise3 8y some o- t6e Iuestions a8o9eC I 8elie9e t6at t6ey lie in t6e -act t6at 6eminist IR scholars see 9i66erent realities an9 9ra0 on 9i66erent e/istemologies 6rom con>entional IR theorists. ;or eDam%leC &6ereas IR has tra3itionally anal)ze9 securit) issues eit6er 6rom a structural /ers/ecti>e or at the le>el o6 the state an9 its 9ecision ma'ersD 6eminists 6ocus on ho0 0orl9 /olitics can contribute to the insecurit) o6 in9i>i9ualsD /articularl) marginalize9 an3 3isem%o&ere3 /o/ulations. :he) eEamine 0hether t6e 9aloriBation oc6aracteristics associate3 ! intro3uction &it6 a 3ominant -orm o- masculinit) in6luences the 6oreign /olicies o6 states. :he) also eEamine 0hether the /ri>ileging o6 t6ese same attributes b) the realist school in IR ma) contribute to the re/ro9uction o6 con6lict;/roneD %o&er5maDimiBin/ beha>iors.11 "6ereas IR theorists 6ocus on the causes an9 termination o6 0arsD 6eminists are as concerne9 0ith 0hat ha//ens 9uring 0ars as 0ell as 0ith their causes an3 en3in/s. Rat6er t6an seein/ military ca%a8ility as an assurance a/ainst outsi3e t6reats to t6e stateC militaries are seen as -reIuently antithetical to in9i>i9ual securit)C /articularl) to t6e security o- 0omen an9 other >ulnerable grou/s. 0oreo9erC 6eminists are concerne9 that continual stress on the nee9 6or 9e6ense hel/s to legitimate a kin3 o- militarize9 social or9er that o>er>alorizes t6e use o- state >iolence -or 3omestic an3 international %ur%oses. !on>entional IP. has ty%ically 6ocuse9 on issues such as the economic beha>ior o6 t6e most %o&er-ul statesD hegemon)D an9 t6e %otential -or buil9ing international institutions in an anarchic s)stem /o/ulate9 b) sel6;intereste9 actorsJ &it6in a s6are3 state5centric -rame&orkC neorealists an3 neoli8erals 3e8ate t6e %ossi8ilities an3 limitations o- coo%eration usin/ t6e notion o- a8solute 9ersus relati9e /ains.12 Feminists more o-ten 6ocus on economic ineHualit)D marginalize9 /o/ulationsD the gro0ing 6eminization o6 /o>ert) an9 economic ?usticeC %articularly in t6e conteDt o- Nort6/Sout6 relations. "6ereas IR 6as /enerally taken a Eto%53o&nF a%%roac6 -ocuse3 on t6e /reat %o&ersC 6eminist IR o6ten begins its anal)sis at the local le>elD 0ith in9i>i9uals embe99e9 in social structures. "6ile IR 6as 8een concerne3 &it6 eD%lainin/ t6e 8e6a9ior an3 interaction o- states an3 markets in an anarc6ic international en9ironmentC 6eminist IRD &it6 its intellectual roots in -eminist t6eory more /enerally D is see'ing to un9erstan9 t6e 9arious 0a)s in 0hich uneIual gen9er structures constrain 0omen-sC as &ell as some men#sC li-e chances an9 to /rescribe 0a)s in &6ic6 these hierarchical social relations might be eliminate9. :hese 9i66erent realities an9 normati>e agen9as lea9 to 9i66erent metho9ological a//roaches . "6ile IR 6as relie9 6ea9ily on rationalistic theories 8ase3 on t6e natural sciences an3 economicsC 6eminist IR is groun9e9 in humanistic accounts o6 social relationsC %articularly /en3er relations. Notin/ t6at muc6 o- our kno&le3/e a8out t6e &orl3 6as 8een 8ase3 on kno&le3/e a8out menC 6eminists ha>e been s'e/tical o6 metho9ologies that claim the neutralit) o6 their 6acts an9 the uni>ersalit) o6 their conclusions. :his s'e/ticism a8out em%iricist met6o3olo/ies eEten9s to t6e %ossi8ility o- 9e>elo/ing causal la0s to eE/lain the beha>ior o6 states. "6ile -eminists 3o see structural re/ularitiesC suc6 as /en3er an3 %atriarc6yC t6ey 3e-ine t6em as socially constructe3 an3 9aria8le across timeC %laceC an3 cultureJ un3erstan3in/ is %re-erre3 o9er eD%lanation.13 :hese 9i66erences o>er e/istemologies ma) &ell be har9er to reconcile t6an t6e 3i--erences in %ercei9e3 realities 3iscusse3 a8o9e.
<:@ Perm
Realism cannot be assimilate9 into 6eminist theor) ( % 0arrants. :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. 2)52+) A0 In 6er assessment o- t6e %otential -or -in3in/ a s%ace in IR -or -eminist t6eory in t6e realist an3 li8eral a%%roac6es o- t6e inter%ara3i/m 3e8ateC San3ra "6it&ort6 6as su//este3 t6atC to incor/orate gen9erD theories must satis-y t6ree criteria= (1) t6ey must allo0 6or the /ossibilit) o6 tal'ing about the social construction o6 meaningJ (2) t6ey must 9iscuss historical >ariabilit)J an9 (3) t6ey must /ermit theorizing about /o0er in 0a)s that unco>er hi99en /o0er relations. "6it&ort6 claims t6atC in terms o6 these t6ree criteriaC there is little in realism that seems con9uci>e to theorizing about gen9er.)( 46e li8eral %ara3i/m t6at 6as sou/6t to enlar/e concerns 8eyon3 t6e state5centricC national5security -ocus o- realism mi/6t seem more %romisin/J 6o&e9erC accor3in/ to "6it&ort6C it is a6istorical an3 3enies t6e material 8ases o- con-lictC ineIualityC an3 %o&er. Intro3ucin/ &omen an3 /en3er to t6e li8eral %ara3i/m &oul3 also encounter t6e same %ro8lems note3 8y critics o- li8eral -eminism. <ttem/ts to Gbring 0omen into IRF 6ee9 into the mista'en assum/tion that the) are not there in the 6irst /lace. 7s Cynt6ia $nloe tells usC 0omen (as &ell as mar/inaliBe3 %eo%le more /enerally) are highl) in>ol>e9 in 0orl9 /oliticsC but eDistin/ /o0er structuresD institutionalize9 in t6e s%lit 8et&een t6e %u8lic an3 %ri9ate s%6eres an3 &6at counts as Eim%ortantCF 'ee/ them 6rom being hear9.))
:here-s no net bene6it to assimilating 0omen into /atriarch). Peterson $2 (S%ikeC %ro- o- ,olitical Science at t6e
o- 7riBonaC Gendered *tates: )eminist ,(e-.isions of International (elations %!eor+C %.+)A0 In /eneralC t6e 3econstructi9e %ro:ect 3ocuments t6e eDtent an3 tenacity o- an3rocentric 8ias an3 t6e cultural co3i-ication o- men as Kkno&ers.K It re9eals &omenNs eDclusion -rom or tri9ialiBation &it6in masculinist accounts an3C es%eciallyC &omenNs Ka8senceK t6ere as a/ents o- social c6an/e. >ut e9en more si/ni-icantC Ka99ing 0omenJ to eEisting 6rame0or's eE/oses ta'en;6or;grante9 assum/tions embe99e9 in those 6rame0or's. 7cross 3isci%linesC 6eminists 9is;co>er the contra9ictions o6 Ja99ing 0omanJ to constructions that are literall) 9e6ine9 b) their Jman;nessJ@ the /ublic s/hereD rationalit)D economic /o0erD autonom)D /olitical i9entit)D ob?ecti>it) . 46e systematic inclusion o6 0omenKour bo9iesD acti>itiesD 'no0le9geK challenges categorical gi>ensD 9isci/linar) 9i>isionsD an9 theoretical 6rame0or's. It 8ecame increasin/ly clear t6at it 0as not /ossible sim/l) to inclu9e 0omen in those theories 0here the) ha9 /re>iousl) been eEclu9e9D 6or this eEclusion 6orms a 6un9amental structuring /rinci/le an9 'e) /resum/tion o6 /atriarchal 9iscourse. It &as not sim%ly t6e ran/e an3 sco%e o- o8:ects t6at reIuire3 trans-ormation= more %ro-oun3lyC an3 t6reatenin/lyC t6e 9ery Iuestions %ose3 an3 t6e met6o3s use3 to ans&er t6em . . . nee3e3 to 8e seriously Iuestione3. 46e %oliticalC ontolo/ical an3 e%istemolo/ical commitments un3erlyin/ %atriarc6al 3iscoursesC as &ell as t6eir t6eoretical contents reIuire3 re5e9aluation. !( 46e reconstructi9e %ro:ect marks t6e s6i-t K-rom reco9erin/ oursel9es to critically eDaminin/ t6e &orl3 -rom t6e %ers%ecti9e o- t6is reco9ery ... a mo9e -rom mar/in to center.K !) Not sim%ly seekin/ access to an3 %artici%atin/ &it6in (8ut -rom t6e mar/ins o-) an3rocentric %ara3i/msC -eminist reconstruction eD%lores t6e t6eoretical im%lications o- re9ealin/ systemic masculinist 8ias an3 systematically a33in/ &omen. Not sur%risin/lyC the shi6t 6rom J0omen as 'no0ableJ to J0omen as 'no0ersJ locates 6eminism at the heart o6 contem/orar) 9ebates o>er 0hat constitutes science an9 the /o0er o6 Jclaims to 'no0 .K 46is is 3i--icult terrain to ma%C so I start -rom a 9anta/e %oint t6at I 6o%e is reasona8ly -amiliar.
<2@ Realism
Realism is a 6la0e9 mentalit) that legitimizes the >iolence it attem/ts to 9eter. !ohn an9 Ru99ic' % (CarolC Researc6er an3 4eac6er at .ar9ar3 0e3ical Si/nsC an3 SaraC aut6orC 7 ;eminist
$t6ical ,ers%ecti9e on "ea%ons o- 0ass 1estructionC 6tt%=//&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/co6nru33ick.%3-) ,A < so5calle3 ErealistF res/onse to this :u3 /ement might 0ell /a) li/;ser>ice to the Gmoral nicetiesF it embo9iesD but then argue that 9eterrence is 0orth those costs. *rC %er6a%s to 8e more accurateD it might argue that the results o6 a nuclear attac' 0oul9 be so catastro/hic that the rest o6 these consi9erations are reall) an irrele>ant 9istractionI 9eterring a ,8D attac' on our homelan9 is the /recon9ition on 0hich /olitical 6ree9om an9 social li6e 9e/en9C an3 so it must 8e t6ou/6t a8out in a class 8y itsel-. "e make t&o re:oin3ers to t6is claim. ;irstC 0e note that in the culture o6 nuclear 9e6ense intellectuals C e9en raisin/ t6e issue o- costs is 9elegitimize9C in lar/e %art t6rou/6 its association &it6 Et6e -eminine.F It is the 'in9 o6 thing that Gh)sterical house0i>esF 9oI something 9one b) /eo/le not tough an9 har9 enough to loo' harsh Grealit)F in the e)eC unsentimentallyJ not stron/ enou/6 to se%arate t6eir -eelin/s -rom t6eoriBin/ mass 3eat6J /eo/le 0ho 9on-t ha>e Gthe stones 6or 0ar.F Feminist anal)sis re?ects the cultural 9i>ision o- meanin/ &6ic6 3e9alues anyt6in/ associate3 &it6 &omen or -emininity. It sees in t6at same cultural 9aluin/ o- t6e so5calle3 EmasculineF o9er t6e so5calle3 E-eminineF an eD%lanation o- &6y it a%%ears so sel-5e9i3ent to many t6at &6at is calle3 Emilitary necessityF s6oul3 a%%ro%riately 8e %rioritiBe3 o9er all ot6er 6uman necessities. <n9 it Huestions the assum/tions that besto0 the mantle o6 GrealismF on such a constraine9 6ocus on 0ea/ons an9 state /o0er. Rat6er t6an sim%ly 8ein/ an Eo8:ecti9eF re-lection o%olitical realityC 0e un9erstan9 this thought s)stem as 1# a /artial an9 9istorte9 /icture o6 realit)D an9 2# a ma?or contributor to creating the >er) circumstances it /ur/orts to 9escribe an9 /rotect against . Secon3C :ust as -eminists ten3 to 8e ske%tical a8out t6e e--icacy o- 9iolenceC t6ey mi/6t 8e eIually ske%tical a8out t6e e--icacy o- 3eterrence. *rC to %ut it anot6er &ayC i6 0ar is a GlieDF so is 9eterrence. :his is notC ocourseC to sa) that 9eterrence as a /henomena ne>er occursI no 9oubt one o//onent is sometimes 9eterre9 6rom attac'ing another b) the 6ear o6 retaliation. Aut rather 9eterrence as a theor) C a 3iscourse an3 set o- %ractices un3er&ritten 8y t6at 3iscourseC is a 6iction.
<2@ Realism
Realism is inherentl) masculine an9 ma'es >iolence ine>itable ( the Kriti' is the onl) 0a) to sol>e these 6orms o6 >iolence. :ic'ner $2 (A. 7nnC ,ro-essor o- International Relations an3 1irector o- t6e Center -or International Stu3ies at t6e
ni9ersity o- Sout6ern Cali-orniaC 1992. 2en3er in International RelationsC %. !15!!) Aehin9 this rei6ication o6 state /ractices hi9e social institutions that are ma9e an9 rema9e b) in9i>i9ual actions. In realityC t6e neorealist 9e/iction o6 the state as a unitar) actor is groun9e9 in the historical /ractices o6 the ,estern state s)stem= neorealist c6aracteriBations o- state 8e6a9iorC in terms osel-56el%C autonomyC an3 %o&er seekin/C %ri9ile/e c6aracteristics associate3 &it6 t6e "estern construction omasculinity. Since t6e 8e/innin/ o- t6e state systemC the national securit) 6unctions o6 states ha>e been 9ee9e9 to us through gen9ere9 images that /ri>ilege masculinit). 46e "estern state system 8e/an in se9enteent65century $uro%e. 7s 3escri8e3 8y C6arles 4illyC t6e mo3ern state &as 8orn t6rou/6 &arJ lea3ers o- nascent states consoli3ate3 t6eir %o&er t6rou/6 t6e coerci9e eDtraction o- resources an3 t6e conIuest oe9er5lar/er territories. Success in 0ar continue9 to be im/erati>e 6or state sur>i>al an9 the buil9ing o6 state a//aratus.3+ 46rou/6out t6e %erio3 o- state 8uil3in/ in t6e "estC nationalist mo9ements 6a9e use3 /en3ere3 ima/ery t6at eD6orts masculine 6eroes to -i/6t -or t6e esta8lis6ment an3 3e-ense o- t6e mot6er country. 46e collecti9e i3entity o- citiBens in most states 3e%en3s 6ea9ily on tellin/ stories a8outC an3 cele8ration o-C &ars o- in3e%en3ence or national li8eration an3 ot6er /reat 9ictories in 8attle. National ant6ems are -reIuently &ar son/sC :ust as 6oli3ays are cele8rate3 &it6 military %ara3es an3 uni-orms t6at recall /reat -eats in %ast con-licts. 46ese collecti9e 6istorical memories are 9ery im%ortant -or t6e &ay in &6ic6 in3i9i3uals 3e-ine t6emsel9es as citiBens as &ell as -or t6e &ay in &6ic6 states comman3 su%%ort -or t6eir %oliciesC %articularly -orei/n %olicy. RarelyC 6o&e9erC 3o t6ey inclu3e eD%eriences o- &omen or -emale 6eroes. "6ile t6e -unctions o- t&entiet65century states eDten3 &ell 8eyon3 t6e %ro9ision o- national securityC national security issuesC %articularly in time o- &arC o--er a sense o- s6are3 %olitical %ur%ose lackin/ in most ot6er areas o- %u8lic %olicy.39 :he state continues to 9eri>e muc6 o- its legitimac) 6rom its securit) 6unctionI it is 6or national securit) that citizens are 0illing to ma'e sacri6ices C o-ten unIuestionin/ly.!0 0ilitary 8u3/ets are t6e least likely area o- %u8lic s%en3in/ to 8e conteste3 8y %oliticians an3 t6e %u8licC &6o are o-ten mani%ulate3 into su%%ortin/ military s%en3in/ 8y linkin/ it &it6 %atriotism. ,hen 0e thin' about the state acting in matters o6 national securit)D 0e are entering a /olic) 0orl9 almost eEclusi>el) inhabite9 b) men. 8en ma'e national securit) /olic) both insi9e an9 outsi9e the militar) establishment. Carol Co6n ar/ues t6at strategic 9iscourseD 0ith its em/hasis on strengthD stabilit)D an9 rationalit)D bears an uncann) resemblance to the i9eal image o6 masculinit) . Critics o- .S. nuclear strate/y are 8ran3e3 as irrational an3 emotional. In t6e nite3 StatesC t6ese E3e-ense intellectualsF are almost all &6ite menJ Co6n tells us t6at &6ile t6eir lan/ua/e is one o- a8stractionC it is loa3e3 &it6 seDual ima/ery.!' S6e claims t6at the 9iscourse em/lo)e9 in %ro-essional an3 %olitical 3e8ates about *.S. securit) /olic) G0oul9 a//ear to ha>e colonize9 our min9s an9 to ha>e sub?ugate9 other 0a)s o6 un9erstan9ing relations among states.F Co6n su//ests t6at t6is 3iscourse 6as 8ecome t6e only le/itimate res%onse to Iuestions o- 6o& 8est to ac6ie9e national securityJ it is a 3iscourse -ar remo9e3 -rom %olitics an3 %eo%leC an3 its 3eli8erations /o on 3isconnecte3 -rom t6e -unctions t6ey are su%%ose3 to ser9e. Its %o&er-ul claim to le/itimacy restsC in %artC on t6e &ay national security s%ecialists 9ie& t6e international system.
<2@ Realism/Deterrence
Realism an9 9eterrence are inherentl) masculine an9 re;/er/etuate the >iolence the) attem/t to alle>iate. !ohn an9 Ru99ic' % (CarolC Researc6er an3 4eac6er at .ar9ar3 0e3ical Si/nsC an3 SaraC aut6orC 7 ;eminist
$t6ical ,ers%ecti9e on "ea%ons o- 0ass 1estructionC 6tt%=//&&&./en3eran3security.um8.e3u/co6nru33ick.%3-) ,A 1eterrence t6eory is an ela8orateC a8stract conce%tual e3i-iceC &6ic6 %osits a 6y%ot6etical relation 8et&een t&o 3i--erent sets o- &ea%ons systems or rat6erC 8et&een a8stractions o- t&o 3i--erent sets o- &ea%ons systemsC -or in -actC as 8ot6 common sense an3 military eD%ertise tells usC 6uman error an3 tec6nolo/ical im%er-ection mean t6at one coul3 not actually eD%ect real &ea%ons to -unction in t6e &ays sim%ly assume3 in 3eterrence t6eory. Aecause 9eterrence theor) sets in /la) the h)/othetical re/resentations o6 >arious 0ea/ons s)stemsD rather than assessments o6 ho0 the) 0oul9 actuall) /er6orm or 6ail to /er6orm in 0ar6areD it can be nearl) in6initel) elaborate9D in a ne>er en9ing regression o6 intercontinental ballistic missile ga/s an9 theater 0ar6are ga/s an9 tactical Gmini; nu'eF ga/sC a3 in-initumC thus legitimating both massi>e >ertical /roli6eration an9 arms racing. Deterrence theor) is also a 6iction in that it 9e/en9s u/on Grational actorsDF -or &6om &6at counts as ErationalF is t6e sameC in9e/en9ent o6 cultureD histor)D or in9i>i9ual 9i66erence. It 9e/en9s on those Grational actorsF /er6ectl) un9erstan9ing the meaning o6 GsignalsF communicate9 b) militar) actionsD 9es/ite 9e/en9ence on technologies that sometimes mal6unctionI 9es/ite cultural 9i66erence an9 the lac' o6 communication that is /art o6 being /olitical enemiesI 9es/ite the 9i66iculties o6 ensuring mutual un9erstan9ing e>en 0hen best 6rien9s ma'e 9irect 6ace;to; 6ace statements to each other. It 9e/en9s on those same Grational actorsF engaging in a >er) s/eci6ic 'in9 o6 calculus that inclu9es one set o6 >ariables (e./.C &ea%ons siBeC 3eli9era8ilityC sur9i9a8ilityC as &ell as t6e Ecre3i8ilityF o- t6eir an3 t6eir o%%onent#s t6reats)C an9 eEclu9es other >ariables (suc6 as 3omestic %olitical %ressuresC economicsC or in3i9i3ual su8:ecti9ity). "6at is strikin/ -rom a 6eminist /ers/ecti>e is that e>en 0hile GrealistsF ma) 0orr) that some o//onents are so Ginsu66icientl) rationalF as to be un9eterrableD this 9oes not lea9 them to search 6or a more reliable 6orm o6 ensuring securit)C or an a%%roac6 t6at is not so &ea%ons53e%en3ent. Cynt6ia Cock8urnC in 6er stu3y o- &omen#s %eace %ro:ects in con-lict BonesC 3escri8es one o- t6e &omen#s acti9ities as 6el%in/ eac6 ot6er /i9e u% E3an/erous 3ay 3reams.F3' ;rom a -eminist anti5&ar %ers%ecti9eC 6a9in/ "01 as 3eterrents is a 3an/erous 3ream. 46e 3ream o- %er-ect rationality an3 control &6ic6 un3er&rites 3eterrence t6eory is a 3an/erous 3reamC since it le/itimates constructin/ a system t6at only coul3 8e (relati9ely) sa-e i- t6at %er-ect rationa lity an3 control &ere actually %ossi8le. Deterrence theor) itsel6 is a 9angerous 9ream because it ?usti6ies /ro9ucing an9 9e/lo)ing ,8DD thereb) ma'ing their acci9ental or /ur/osi>e use /ossible (an3 -ar more likely) t6an i- t6ey &ere not %ro3uce3 at allC nor 3e%loye3 in suc6 num8ers. ERealistsF are Iuick to %oint out t6e 3an/ers o- not 6a9in/ "01 -or 3eterrence &6en ot6er states 6a9e t6em. ;eminist %ers%ecti9es su//est t6at t6at 3an/er only a%%ears so sel-5e9i3ently /reater t6an t6e 3an/er o- 6a9in/ "01 i- you 3iscount as Eso-tF serious attention to t6e costs o- 3e9elo%ment an3 3e%loyment.
<:@ Realism
Realism 6ails ( it can-t e>en eE/lain some o6 the most im/ortant e>ents o6 the /ast 200 )ears. :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. 35') A0 Since its ince%tionC at t6e 8e/innin/ o- t6e centuryC t6e 3isci%line o- international relations 6as /one t6rou/6 a series o- 3e8ates o9er 8ot6 its su8:ect matter an3 t6e met6o3olo/ies a%%ro%riate -or its in9esti/ations. 1 None o- t6ese 3e8ates 6a9e 8een as -un3amental as t6ose o- t6e last t&o 3eca3es. :he en9 o6 the !ol9 ,ar an9 t6e %lurality o- ne0 issues on the global agen9aC to &6ic6 I re-erre3 in my intro3uctory c6a%terC ha>e been accom/anie9 b) increasin/ calls 6or rethin'ing t6e -oun3ations o- a 3isci%line t6at a%%ears to some to 8e out o- touc6 &it6 t6e re9olutionary c6an/es in &orl3 %oliticsC as &ell as 3e-icient in 6o& to eD%lain t6em. Austin Rosen8er/ 6as su//este3 t6at it is stran/e t6at momentous e>entsD such as the colla/se o6 So>iet !ommunismC t6e strains o- .uro/ean integrationC an9 t6e economic gro0th o6 !hina (&6ic6 %resently contains one5-i-t6 o- t6e &orl3#s %o%ulation)C e>ents that are /art o6 a gigantic 0orl9 re>olution o6 mo9ernizationD in9ustrializationD nationalismD an9 globalization in 0hich the ,est has been caught u/ -or t6e last t&o 6un3re3 yearsC ten9 to be eEclu9e9 6rom most IR theor).2 Instea9 o6 &6at 6e claims are ari9 9ebates about hegemonic stabilit) or or3er 9ersus :usticeC 0hich abstract 6rom real;0orl9 issuesC Rosen8er/ calls -or t6eory /roun3e3 in 6istorical an3 social analyses. 7e suggests that global issues can be better eE/laine9 through narrati>e 6orms o6 eE/lanation rather than social;scienti6ic metho9ologies o6 con>entional IR.
<:@ Realism
:he realism inherent in IR eEclu9es 0omen-s >oices an9 6emininit) ( this /re>ents 0omen 6rom gaining in6luence in securit) /olicies Alanchar9 % ($ricC Si/ns 2+(!)C Summer 2003C %.1292)
;eminist incursions into t6e -iel3 o- IR security can 8e use-ully situate3 on t6e &i3enin/ si3e o- t6e K&i35 enin/K 9ersus Knarro&in/K 3e8ate= t6e -ormer ar/ues t6at t6e sco%e o- t6e neorealist conce%t o- security nee3s to 8e eD%an3e3 to a33ress a ran/e o- t6reatsC utiliBe a 8roa3er s%ectrum o- met6o3olo/iesC an3 a33ress mountin/ et6ical concerns (<olo3Bie: 1992)J t6e latter ar/ues t6at a mo>e
be)on9 the stu9) o6 militar) 6orce 0oul9 9eal a serious blo0 to the 6iel9Ss intellectual coherence 0hile 9istracting 6rom serious threats ("alt 1991). Critical se5 curity 3iscourse 6as /enerally in9oke3C 8ut not en/a/e3C -eminist
sc6olar5 s6i%C an3 e9en a%%roac6es t6at ima/ine3 societal sectors o- security (>uBanC "a9erC an3 3e "il3e 199+) 6a9e yet to take /en3er seriously (.ansen 2000).3 ;eminists in IR ar/ue t6at realismD 9ominate9 b) eliteD 0hiteD male /ractitionersD is a /atriarchal 9iscourse t6at ren9ers 0omen in>isible 6rom the high /olitics o6 IR e>en as it 9e/en9s on 0omenSs sub?ugation as a JS9omesticate9S 6igure 0hose S6eminineS sensibilities are 8ot6 at o33s &it6 an3 inconseHuential to the harsh SrealitiesS o6 the /ublic 0orl9 o6 men an9 states K (Runyan an3 ,eterson 1991C (+5 (9). ;eminists in IR eD%lain t6e eDclusion o- &omen -rom -orei/n %olicy 3ecision makin/ 8y %ointin/ to t6e KeDtent to &6ic6
international /olitics is such a thoroughl) mas; culinize9 s/here o6 acti>it) that 0omenSs >oices are consi9ere9 inauth; enticK (4ickner 1992C !). "omenNs tra3itional eDclusion -rom t6e military an3 continuin/ lack o- access to %olitical %o&er at times %resents &omen &it6 a Kcatc6522K situation. ;or eDam%le D the im/ortance o6 a can9i9ateSs militar) ser>ice as a Huali6ication 6or go>ernment o66ice in *.S. /olitical cam/aigns /uts 0omen C &6o cannot a%%eal to t6is eD%erienceC at a 9is; a9>antage in obtaining the elite status o6 national o66ice an9 thus the abilit) to a66ect 9e6ense an9 securit) /olicies (4o8ias 1990J c-. $ls6tain 2000C !!').
Realism ignores human agenc) an9 i9entit) an9 brutall) eEclu9es all that is 6eminine Alanchar9 % ($ricC Si/ns 2+(!)C Summer 2003C %.1312)I0
<n im/ortant com/onent o6 the stu9) o6 IRis a sel6;/ositioning in the tra9ition o6 ,estern /olitical theor);tracing an intellectual lineage to 8achia>elli an3 .o88es5%articularly as it concerns t6e state. ;eminist analysis o- t6is %e35 i/ree s6o&s t6at the 6eminine has long ser>e9 as a s)mbolic threat to mil; itarize9 ,estern conce/tualizations o- %olitical communityC -rom t6e ancient 2reeks to t6e t&entiet6 centuryJ 7esc6ylusNs ;uries an3 0ac6ia9elliNs ;or5 tuna are 8ut t&o eDam%les (.arstock 19+3). Re8ecca 2rant (1991) ar/ues t6at a gen9er bias in IRC transmitte3 un%ro8lematically -rom "estern %o5 litical t6ou/6t to t6e stu3y o- IRC results in the Huestion o6 gen9er being ta'en as irrele>ant. ;or 2rantC IRNs inter%retation o- .o88es allo&s Kno room -or t6e Iuestion o- 6o& /en3er relations a--ect t6e transition out
o- t6e 8rutis6 state o- nature an3 into societyCK &6ile Aean5AacIues RousseauNs -amous sta/ 6untC o-ten in9oke3 as a %ara8le o- t6e %ro8lems o- securityC i/nores t6e -amilial relations t6at control t6e 6unterNs 3e-ection -rom t6e 6untin/ circle (1051'). :a'ing men
as the sole /olitical actors an9 citizensD the /olitical theor) borro0e9 b) IR /ostulates a 9omestic/international 9i>i9e /remise9 on the /ri>ate//ublic 9istinction that relegates 0omen to a s/ace outsi9e /olitics (9). Aean >et6ke $ls6tainNs ric6 8len3 o- %olitical t6eoryC %ersonal narrati9eC an3 6istoryC "omen an3 "ar
(G19+)H 199')C ser9es as a re:oin3er to t6e 3isci%lineNs %6iloso%6ical conceit an3 issues a key c6allen/e to t6e 3o5 mestic/international 3i9i3e t6at 2rant i3enti-ies. In a s&ee%in/ sur9ey o- t6e 3iscourse o- &ar -rom t6e 2reeks on&ar3C $ls6tain 3etails &omenNs com%leD relations6i%s to t6e 8o3y %oliticC an3 t6us to &arC as t6ey emer/e -rom t6e narrati9es (&ar stories) t6at are constituti9e o- &ar. $ls6tain -ocuses on t6e &ays in &6ic6 &arNs K/ro9ucti>e 9estructi>enessJ inscribes an9 reinscribes menSs an9 0omenSs i9entities an9 thus the boun9aries o6 communit)= K"ar creates t6e %eo%le. "ar %ro3uces %o&erC in3i9i3ual an3 collecti9eK (1((5()). Reactin/ to &6at s6e sees as t6e onset o- scientism an3 6y%errationality in aca3emic IRC $ls6tain critiIues t6e retreat into a8straction t6at t6e Iuest -or scienti-ic certainty %ro3uce3 in K%ro-es5 sionaliBe3K &ar 3iscourse an3 attem%ts to re9i9e t6e 8on3 8et&een %olitics an3 morality 8roken 8y 0ac6ia9elli. >y rei-yin/ state 8e6a9iorC $ls6tain ar/uesC the realist narrati>e
ignores human agenc) an9 i9entit)@ J o chil; 9ren are e>er bornD an9 nobo9) e>er 9iesD in this constructe9 0orl9. 46ere are statesC an3 t6ey are &6at isK (91).!
<:@ Realism
RealismD the basis o6 international relationsD is /ro6oun9l) gen9ere9 an9 eEclu9es the 6eminine Duncanson an9 .schle 5 (Claire an3 Cat6erineC o- $3in8ur/6 an3 o- Strat6cly3eC Ne& ,olitical Science
30(!)C %. ''3)I0
46is is t6e t6ir3 stran3 o- t6e -eminist critiIue o- t6e &ay in &6ic6 states talk a8out nuclear tec6nolo/y. Co6n#s assertion /ains stron/ su%%ort -rom ot6er -eminist &orkC %articularly t6at in t6e 3isci%line o- International Relations (IR)C &6ic6 6as 3e9elo%e3 an eDtensi9e critiIue o- the gen9ere9 un9er/innings o6 9ominant conce/tions o6 both the state an9 securit). Such
0or' 6ocuses its critiHue /articularl) on RealismD a school o6 thought that sees the 0orl9 as an anarchic s)stem o6 sel6;intereste9 states struggling to 9e6en9 themsel>es through militar) /o0er . Since "orl3 "ar 4&oC Realism has been the 9ominant a//roach in IR as &ell as amon/st statesmenC %olicy5makers an3 3e-ence intellectualsC an3 t6e < is no eDce%tion. 7s &e &ill s6o& 8elo&C the Realist 0orl9 >ie0 is a masculinise9 oneD in 0hich Gmanl)F states stri>e 6or sel6;reliance an9 securit) . Feminists in IR %ro8lematiBe t6e Realist a%%roac6 to security on se9eral /roun3s. 0ost o89iouslyC t6ey Huestion 0h) militar) threats -rom ot6er states (orC more recentlyC -rom terrorist /rou%s) are consi9ere9 more im/ortant an3 imme3iate than the threat"s# to 6uman li-e %ose3 8y %o9ertyC .IL/7I1SC en9ironmental 3estruction or 3omestic a8useC all o- 0hich are claime9 to 9is/ro/ortionatel) a66ect 0omen. 7s a corollaryC the) challenge the Realist reliance on 9estructi>e militar) technolog)D insistin/ t6at
&el-are 8u3/ets 3o more to %ro9i3e /enuine security -or &omen t6an increase3 3e-ence s%en3in/.!( ;eminists also seek to un3ermine t6e 9ie& t6at security is somet6in/ &6ic6 can 8e %ossesse3 or /uarantee3 8y t6e state. Instea3C t6ey 6a9e ur/e3 us to un3erstan3 security as a %rocessC immanent in our relations6i%s &it6 ot6ersC an3 al&ays %artialC elusi9eC an3 conteste3. Concei9e3 in t6is &ayC it must in9ol9e su8:ectsMinclu3in/ &omenMin t6e %ro9ision o- t6eir o&n security.!) 4&o /en3ere3 as%ects o- Realist conce%tions osecurity are %articularly im%ortant -or our %ur%oses. ;irstC Realists correlate securit) 0ith in>ulnerabilit)D in>incibilit) an9 im/regnabilit). 7s Susanna6 Ra3st one 6as ar/ue3C 6o&e9erC i n>ul nerabi l i t ) i s an
unachie>able 6antas) 0ith ob>iousl) gen9ere9 connotations. It is the 6emale bo9) that is /enetrate9 an9 im/regnate9 0hile the male bo9) remainsC or ou/6t to remainC intact an3 im/ermeable Secon3C an3 %er6a%s more im%ortantC Realist >ie0s o6 securit) cast the state an9 its militar) 0ing as G/rotectorF an9 ci>ilians 0ithin the state as G/rotecte9DF a 9ichotom) 0hich is /ro6oun9l) gen9ere9 . Au3it6 .icks Stie6mC -or instanceC 6i/6li/6ts t6e 6istorical association o- t6e %rotector role &it6 men an3 t6e %rotecte3 role &it6 &omenJ -urt6erC s6e claims t6at the /rotector role gains meaning an9 status /recisel) through its /ri>ileging o>er those 0ho are 6eminise9 as >ulnerable.
74= Realism
Realism 3enies t6e use o- 3i%lomacy in -orei/n %olicy Ruiz 3 (4riciaC La& S "as6C *ct. 1' 200)C 6onors.csustan.e3u/:ournals/Soun3in/s/RuiB.%3-)I0
Realism centers its theoretical structure on ho0 the state see's /o0er an9 9e6en9s its national interests a/ainst ot6er com%etin/ states &it6in a /lo8al anarc6yC or &6ere t6ere is t6e lack o- aut6ority 6i/6er t6an t6e state.
States seek security t6rou/6 a 8alance o- %o&er in t6e international arenaC %rimarily t6rou/6 military meansC an3 resortin/ to &arC inecessary. Realists generall) >ie0 the state as the 'e) actor in international /oliticsD an9 3e5em%6asiBe orC as -eminist t6eory ar/uesC ignore ;; the role o6 the in9i>i9ual. 0uc6 -eminist IR t6eory stems -rom a critiIue orealism"Ps#D &6ose Esociall) constructe9 0orl9>ie0 continues to gui9e much thought about 0orl9 /olitics.F1! ;irstC 6eminists argue that realists o>er>alue the role o6 the state in 9e6ining international relationsD 0ithout Huestioning ho0 the state itsel6 is internall) structure9 C %olitically an3 socially. ;eminist t6eory &oul3 consi9er ho0 the state inclu9esD or eEclu9esD the >ie0s o6 its in9i>i9ual citizens C an3 6o&C in turnC t6e state#s 3omestic 9ie&s translate into -orei/n %olicies. .o& &oul3 t6e 3e-inition o- Rsecurity# c6an/eV "oul3 military an3 3e-ense ca%a8ilities still 8e ato% t6e a/en3aV "oul3 &omen necessarily 8e less militaristic in t6eir a%%roac6 to IR issuesV Gen9er
eHualit) can be lin'e9 to increase9 use o6 9i/lomac) an9 com/romise in their state-s 6oreign /olic).
7not6er -eminist critiIue o- realism concerns 6o& realists 3e-ine an3 em%6asiBe %o&er in IR 3iscussions. ;eminists &oul3 ask= &6o 3e-ines %o&erC &6o 6as itC an3 6o& is it use3V I6 /o0er is 9e6ine9 b) a /atriarchal an9 realist societ)D 0hich see's global balances o6 /o0erD then /o0er is eHuate9 0ith militar) an9 economic strength . >ut 6o& &oul3 t6is c6an/e i- t6e 3iscussion inclu3e3 &omen#s 9ie&%ointsV "oul3 t6e in3icators o- %o&er 8e measure3 3i--erentlyV "oul3 %o&er 8e seen as lea3ers6i% in %eace a/reementsC or mi/6t it 8e measure3 in terms o- t6e a8ility to ac6ie9e transnational coo%erationV
Realism /reclu9es 6eminist 9iscussion ( it eEclu9es in9i>i9ual citizensD 6ails to anal)ze the state an9 9e6ines /o0er as masculine militar) might Ruiz 3 (4riciaC La& S "as6C *ct. 1' 200)C 6onors.csustan.e3u/:ournals/Soun3in/s/RuiB.%3-)I0
Realism centers its theoretical structure on ho0 the state see's /o0er an9 9e6en9s its national interests a/ainst ot6er com%etin/ states &it6in a /lo8al anarc6yC or &6ere t6ere is t6e lack o- aut6ority 6i/6er t6an t6e state.
States seek security t6rou/6 a 8alance o- %o&er in t6e international arenaC %rimarily t6rou/6 military meansC an3 resortin/ to &arC inecessary. Realists generall) >ie0 the state as the 'e) actor in international /oliticsD an9 3e5em%6asiBe orC as -eminist t6eory ar/uesC ignore ;; the role o6 the in9i>i9ual. 0uc6 -eminist IR t6eory stems -rom a critiIue orealism"Ps#D &6ose Esociall) constructe9 0orl9>ie0 continues to gui9e much thought about 0orl9 /olitics.F1! ;irstC 6eminists argue that realists o>er>alue the role o6 the state in 9e6ining international relationsD 0ithout Huestioning ho0 the state itsel6 is internall) structure9 C %olitically an3 socially. ;eminist t6eory &oul3 consi9er ho0 the state inclu9esD or eEclu9esD the >ie0s o6 its in9i>i9ual citizens C an3 6o&C in turnC t6e state#s 3omestic 9ie&s translate into -orei/n %olicies. .o& &oul3 t6e 3e-inition o- Rsecurity# c6an/eV "oul3 military an3 3e-ense ca%a8ilities still 8e ato% t6e a/en3aV "oul3 &omen necessarily 8e less militaristic in t6eir a%%roac6 to IR issuesV Gen9er
eHualit) can be lin'e9 to increase9 use o6 9i/lomac) an9 com/romise in their state-s 6oreign /olic).
7not6er -eminist critiIue o- realism concerns 6o& realists 3e-ine an3 em%6asiBe %o&er in IR 3iscussions. ;eminists &oul3 ask= &6o 3e-ines %o&erC &6o 6as itC an3 6o& is it use3V I6 /o0er is 9e6ine9 b) a /atriarchal an9 realist societ)D 0hich see's global balances o6 /o0erD then /o0er is eHuate9 0ith militar) an9 economic strength . >ut 6o& &oul3 t6is c6an/e i- t6e 3iscussion inclu3e3 &omen#s 9ie&%ointsV "oul3 t6e in3icators o- %o&er 8e measure3 3i--erentlyV "oul3 %o&er 8e seen as lea3ers6i% in %eace a/reementsC or mi/6t it 8e measure3 in terms o- t6e a8ility to ac6ie9e transnational coo%erationV In relation to realismC -eminist t6eory is clear= realism is the antithesis to achie>ing gen9er eHualit)D both in 9iscussion an9 /racticeD an9 e9en in its tools o6 0ar an9 securit)D /atriarch) remains the central theme. States are the actors an9 the in9i>i9ual is o6 little im/ortance. ,hen the in9i>i9ual is 9e;
em/hasize9D there is e>en less ac'no0le9gement o6 a 6emale in9i>i9ualD 0hich e66ecti>el) eEclu9es 6eminist 9iscussion.
<:@ .ssentialism
K associates 6eminismD not 0omenD 0ith /eace ( the 9istinction is critical to /roblematizing essentialism an9 masculinit). :ic'ner 1 (A. 7nnC %ro- at t6e Sc6ool o- International RelationsC SCC Gendering World Politics: Issues and
pproac!es in t!e Post"#old War $raC %. (05(1) A0 "6ile t6is essentialiBin/ association o- &omen &it6 %eace is %ro8lematicC it is t6e case t6at 0omen in t6e nite3 States ha>e consistentl) sho0n less su//ort 6or 6orce6ul means o6 /ursuing 6oreign;/olic) /oals than menC an3 t6is /en3er /a% continues to /ro&. It &as &i3est at t6e time o- t6e 2ul- "ar o- 1991M alt6ou/6 it close3 some&6at once t6e -i/6tin/ 6a3 8e/un.+3 It 6as also 8een su//este3 t6at those 0ho o//ose militar) inter>ention are among those most li'el) to su//ort 6eminist goals C a claim su//orte9 b) an anal)sis o- attitu3es to&ar3 t6e %eace %rocess in t6e 0i33le $ast. 7 stu3y o- IsraeliC $/y%tianC ,alestinianC an3 <u&aiti attitu9es to0ar9 the <rab/Israeli con6lictC bro'en 9o0n b) seEC 6oun9 t6at men an3 &omen 3i3 not 6a9e 3i--erent attitu3es an3 t6ere &as no e9i3ence o- &omen 8ein/ less militaristic. sin/ 3ata collecte3 8et&een 19++ an3 199!C t6e stu3y 3i3C 6o&e9erC -in3 a strong %ositi9e correlation bet0een attitu9es to0ar9 su//ort 6or eHualit) o6 0omen an9 su//ort 6or 9i/lomac) an9 com/romise. 46e aut6ors t6ere-ore sa& a connection 8et&een -eminism an3 %ositi9e attitu3es a8out t6e resolution ointernational con-lict.+! 46is eDam%le is instructi9eJ re9ucing uneHual gen9er hierarchies coul9 ma'e a /ositi>e contribution to /eace an9 social ?ustice. Like&iseC 8y mo9in/ 8eyon3 3ic6otomous &ays ot6inkin/ a8out &ar an3 %eaceC %ro8lematiBin/ t6e social construction o- /en3er 6ierarc6iesC an3 eE/osing m)ths about male /rotection that these 0a)s o6 thin'ing /romoteC &e 0oul9 be able to construct less; gen9ere9 an9 more;inclusi>e 9e6initions o6 securit) . *--erin/ a counter%osition t6at re:ects 8ot6 t6e masculinity o- &ar an3 a -eminine %eaceC 0ary >ur/uieres 6as ar/ue3 -or 8uil3in/ a -eminist security -rame&ork on commonC un/en3ere3 -oun3ations. S6e 6as su//este3 a role -or -eminism in 3ismantlin/ t6e ima/ery t6at un3erlies %atriarc6y an3 militarism an3 a :oint e--ort in &6ic6 8ot6 &omen an3 men &oul3 8e res%onsi8le -or c6an/in/ eDistin/ structures.+' Such e66orts reHuire a /roblematization o6 9ichotomize9 constructions such as 0ar an9 /eace an9 realism an9 i9ealism in or9er to /ro>i9e ne0 0a)s o6 un9erstan9ing t6ese %6enomena t6at can 6el% us en9isa/e a more ro8ust notion o- security.
<:@ Autler
Aailing on legal change 6or /aro9ic /er6ormance 6ails to brea' 9o0n gen9er categories an9 colla/ses into Huietism ussbaum 2' (0art6aC %ro-essor an3 %6iloso%6erC E46e ,ro-essor o- ,aro3yF) ,A
So &6at 3oes AutlerSs 0or' a33 to t6is co%ious 8o3y o- &ritin/V Gender %rouble an3 &odies t!at Matter contain no 3etaile3 argument a/ainst 8iolo/ical claims o- KnaturalK 3i--erenceC no account o- mec6anisms o- /en3er re%licationC an3 no account o- t6e le/al s6a%in/ o- t6e -amilyJ nor 3o t6ey contain any 3etaile3 -ocus on %ossi8ilities 6or legal cahange. "6atC t6enC 3oes >utler o--er t6at &e mi/6t not -in3 more -ully 3one in earlier -eminist &ritin/sV *ne relati9ely ori/inal claim is t6at &6en &e reco/niBe t6e arti-iciality o- /en3er 3istinctionsC an3 re-rain -rom t6inkin/ o- t6em as eD%ressin/ an in3e%en3ent natural realityC &e &ill also un3erstan3 t6at t6ere is no com%ellin/ reason &6y t6e /en3er ty%es s6oul3 6a9e 8een t&o (correlate3 &it6 t6e t&o 8iolo/ical seDes)C rat6er t6an t6ree or -i9e or in3e-initely many. K"6en t6e constructe3 status o/en3er is t6eoriBe3 as ra3ically in3e%en3ent o- seDC /en3er itsel- 8ecomes a -ree5-loatin/ arti-iceCK s6e &rites. ;rom this claim it 9oes not 6ollo0C -or >utlerC t6at &e can -reely rein9ent t6e /en3ers as &e like= s6e 6ol3sC in3ee3C t6at there are se>ere limits to our 6ree9om. S6e insists t6at &e s6oul3 not nai9ely ima/ine t6at t6ere is a %ristine sel- t6at stan3s 8e6in3 societyC rea3y to emer/e all %ure an3 li8erate3= K46ere is no sel- t6at is %rior to t6e con9er/ence or &6o maintains Zinte/rityN %rior to its entrance into t6is con-licte3 cultural -iel3. :here is onl) a ta'ing u/ o6 the tools 0here the) lieD 0here the >er) Rta'ing u/S is enable9 b) the tool l)ing there.J >utler 3oes claimC t6ou/6C that 0e can create categories that are in some sense ne0 onesD b) means o6 the art6ul /aro9) o6 the ol9 ones. 46us 6er 8est kno&n i3eaC her conce/tion o6 /olitics as a /aro9ic /er6ormanceD is born out o6 the sense o6 a (strictly limite9# 6ree9om that comes 6rom the recognition that oneSs i9eas o6 gen9er ha>e been sha/e9 b) 6orces that are social rather than biological. ,e are 9oome9 to re/etition o6 the /o0er structures into 0hich 0e are bornD but 0e can at least ma'e 6un o6 themI an9 some 0a)s o6 ma'ing 6un are sub>ersi>e assaults on the original norms .
Strategicall) using gen9er categories is more /oliticall) e66ecti>e Aal90in $3 (0ar/aret 7C ,ro-essor o- La& at ;S C E,u8lic "omen an3 t6e ;eminist StateF)
.o&e9er salutary t6e %ostmo3ern /oal o- 3e5essentialiBin/ &omenC /ostmo9ern theor) ultimatel) e66aces the s/eci6ic situation o6 /ublic 0omenD an9 6or6eits altogether an) account o6 gen9er along the 0a) . 46is 3i--icultyC an3 its im%lications -or %olitical strate/yC is o-ten s%oken o- 8ut rarely a33resse3 seriously &it6in %ostmo3ern -eminism. 1enise Riley o--ers t6e 3iktat t6at at such ?unctures 0omen can 'no0 amongst themsel>es Jthat S0omenS 9onSt eEist ;; 0hile maintaining a /olitics o6 Ge1(0H Nas i6 the) eEiste9S 55 since t6e &orl3 8e6a9es as i- t6ey unam8i/uously 3i3.K !3! Au3it6 Autler ma'es the same tactical concession 0hen she a66irms the continue9 necessit) o6 asserting Ja generall) share9 conce/tion o6 S0omenSK !3' as a /olitical strateg)@ "it6in -eminismC it seems as i- t6ere is some %olitical necessity to s%eak as an3 -or &omenC an3 I &oul3 not contest t6at necessity. SurelyC t6at is t6e &ay in &6ic6 re%resentational %olitics o%eratesC an3 . . . lobb)ing e66orts are >irtuall) im/ossible 0ithout recourse to i9entit) /olitics. So 0e agree that 9emonstrations an9 legislati>e e66orts an9 ra9ical mo>ements nee9 to ma'e claims in the name o6 0omen. !3(
===!uomo===
===<66 <ns0ers===
9)namics that characterize male;6emale relations. either can the state be un9erstoo9 solel) as an instrument o6 menSs interests. 7s a t6res6ol3 matterC 0hat constitutes those interests is not sel6;e>i9entC as 0ac<innonNs o&n illustrations su//est. I-C -or eDam%leC %olicies li8eraliBin/ a8ortion ser9e male o8:ecti9es 8y en6ancin/ access to -emale seDualityC %olicies curtailin/ a8ortion %resuma8ly also ser9e male o8:ecti9es 8y re3ucin/ -emale autonomy. n23 In e--ectC /atriarchal 6rame0or's >erge on tautolog). <lmost an) gen9er;relate9 /olic) can be seen as either 9irectl) ser>ing menSs imme9iate interestsD or as com/romising short;term concerns in the ser>ice o6 broa9erD long;term goalsC suc6 as KnormaliBin/K t6e system an3 sta8iliBin/ %o&er relations. < 6rame0or' that can characterize all state inter>entions as 9irectl) or in9irectl) /atriarchal o66ers little /ractical gui9ance in challenging the con9itions it con9emns. 7n3 i- &omen are not a 6omo/enous /rou% &it6 unitary concernsC surely t6e same is true o- men. 0oreo9erC i- t6e state
is 8est un3erstoo3 as a net&ork o- institutions &it6 com%leDC sometimes com%etin/ a/en3asC t6en t6e %atriarc6al mo3el o- sin/le5min3e3 instrumentalism seems 6i/6ly im%lausi8le. It is 3i--icult to 3ismiss all t6e anti53iscrimination initiati9es o- t6e last Iuarter century as %urely counter5re9olutionary strate/ies. 7n3 it is %recisely t6ese initiati9esC &it6 t6eir a%%eal to KmaleK norms o- Ko8:ecti9ity an3 t6e im%ersonality o- %roce3ureC t6at G6a9e create3H Ge11+(H le9era/e -or t6e re%resentation o- &omenNs interests.K n2! !ross;cultural
research also suggests that the status o6 0omen is /ositi>el) correlate9 0ith a strong stateD 0hich is scarcel) the relationshi/ that /atriarchal 6rame0or's im/l). n2' "6ile t6e KtyranniesK o- %u8lic an3 %ri9ate 3e%en3ence are %lainly relate3C many -eminists c6allen/e t6e claim t6at t6ey are t6e same. 7s Carole ,ateman notesC 0omen 9o not Jli>e 0ith the state an9 are better able to ma'e collecti>e struggle against institutions than in9i>i9uals.K n2( :o a9>ance that struggleD 6eminists nee9 more concrete an9 conteEtual accounts o6 state institutions than /atriarchal 6rame0or's ha>e su//lie9 . &um/ing together /oliceD 0el6are 0or'ersD an9 Pentagon o66icials as agents o6 a unitar) /atriarchal structure 9oes more to obscure than to a9>ance anal)sis. ,hat seems necessar) is a conteEtual a//roach that can account 6or greater com/leEities in 0omenSs relationshi/s 0ith go>erning institutions . Oet 3es%ite t6eir limitationsC
%atriarc6al t6eories un3erscore an insi/6t t6at /enerally in-orms -eminist t6eoriBin/. 7s ,art II re-lectsC /o9ernmental institutions are im%licate3 in t6e most -un3amental structures o- seD58ase3 ineIuality an3 in t6e strate/ies necessary to a33ress it.
Stu9ents lac' 9isci/line to /ursue changeD the militar) teaches organization an9 9etail 6ocus that bene6its acti>ists 8azur $$ "1iane .. 8azur 5 7ssociate ,ro-essor o- La&C . o- ;lori3a. Ca%tainC S 7ir ;orceC 19)95+3 19$$ S%rin/C 22 .ar9. "omenNs L.A. 39 E7 C7LL 4* 7R0SF)
7s la& teac6ersC 0e
see it in t6e classroomJ one mi/6t call it the J0ell . . . 0hate>erJ s)n9rome. ,hen 0e tr) to remin9 stu9ents o6 the criticall) im/ortant nature o6 some seemingl) insigni6icant -actC e9entC 0or9C or turn o6 /hraseD the 0ear) but incre9ulous loo' &e sometimes recei9e in return is one that s/ea'sD J0ell . . . 0hate>er.K 1+0 "6ile I am certainly Ge)'H not recommen3in/ t6at la& stu3ents nee3 any -orm o- a39ersati9e Kla& sc6ool 8oot cam%CK la0 stu9ents 0oul9 be better o66 0ith enhance9 s'ills o6 JconcentrationD attention to 9etailD an9D abo>e allD /atience.K 1+1 4ne o6 the ob?ecti>es o6 militar) training is to scrub 6rom ci>ilians this com6ortableness 0ith a//roEimationD an9C -urt6ermoreC to teach a JXen;li'e 6etish 6or minor 9etailsJ 1+2 that /re>ails e>en un9er con9itions o6 se>ere /h)sical stress an9 mental con6usion. 7 trainin/ eDercise t6atC to
a -eminist le/al sc6olarC mi/6t a%%ear to 8e not6in/ more t6an sa3istic s%ort a8out tri9iality actually 6as a %ointC an3 it 6as a -air %oint. 1+3 &ac' o6 6amiliarit) 0ith the militar) has 9isa9>antage9 legal 6eminists in their e66orts to a9>ance cre9ibleD /ro9ucti>e arguments about gen9er issues in militar) training C 8ut it 6as also 3isa39anta/e3 -eminist liti/ation in a more 3irect an3 conseIuential &ay. 46e Iuality o- ci9il5ri/6ts re%resentation 3e%en3s on more t6an :ust eD%ertise in ci9il5 ri/6ts liti/ationJ t6e most e--ecti9e re%resentation also reIuires an un3erstan3in/ o- rele9ant -actual conteDt in t6e clientNs community=
stan3ar3s o- 6uman ri/6tsC articulate3 at t6e international le9el are also 8ein/ eDamine3 -or /en3er 8ias. 4y%icallyC 0omen-s mo>ementsC &6ic6 stri9e -or &6at t6ey claim is a more /enuine -orm o- 3emocracyC ha>e been situate9 at the local le>el or in non/o9ernmental transnational social mo9ements. 7s 3iscusse3 in
c6a%ter 3C -eminists 6a9e stresse3 t6e im%ortance o- t6ese mo9ementsC not only in terms o- t6eir attem%ts to %lace &omen#s issues on t6e international a/en3aC 8ut also in terms o- t6eir success in re3e-inin/ %olitical t6eory an3 %ractice an3 t6inkin/ more 3ee%ly a8out o%%ressi9e /en3er relations an3 6o& to reconstitute t6em. .o&e9erC certain 6eminists 6a9e 8e/un to Huestion 0hether
0omen-s /artici/ation in these nongo>ernmental arenas can ha>e su--icient /o0er to e66ect changeI &6ile t6ey remain ske%tical o- t6e %atriarc6al un3er%innin/s o- many contem%orary statesC certain 6eminists are no& beginning to reeEamine the /otential o6 the state as an emanci/ator) institution. ,articularly -or &omen an3 -eminists -rom t6e Sout6C 3emocratiBation 6as o%ene3 u% some s%ace &it6in &6ic6 to le9era/e t6e state to 3eal &it6 t6eir concernsJ man) o6 them see the state as ha>ing the /otential to /ro>i9e a bu66er against an international s)stem 9ominate9 b) its most /o0er6ul members. .o&e9erC a /enuinely 3emocratic stateC 3e9oi3 o- /en3er an3 ot6er o%%ressi9e social 6ierarc6iesC &oul3 reIuire a 3i--erent 3e-inition o- 3emocracyC citiBens6i%C an3 6uman ri/6tsC as &ell as a 3i--erent relations6i% &it6 t6e international system.
:he la0 can be use9 to re>erse >iolence. :here is nothing inherent in the la0 that ties our han9s >utler 9)"Ju9ithD Pro6essor o6 Rhetoric an9 !om/arati>e &iterature at *! Aer'ele)C$Dcita8le S%eec6= 7 ,olitics o- t6e ,er-ormati9eC Routle3/e= Ne& OorkC %. 9+)
46e stateNs eDercise o- t6is %ro3ucti9e 3iscursi9e -unction is un3erestimate3 in t6e &ritin/s t6at -a9or o- 6ate s%eec6 le/islation. In3ee3C t6ey minimiBe t6e %ossi8ility o- a misa%%ro%riation 8y t6e la& in -a9or o- a 9ie& o- t6e la& as %olitically neutral an3 mallea8le. 8atsu9a argues that la0D though 6orme9 in racismD can be re9irecte9 against racism. She 6igures the la0 as a set o6 JratchetJ toolsD 9escribing it in /urel) in ; strumental termsD an9 9iscounting the /ro9ucti>e misa//ro/riations b) 0hich it /rocee9s. :his >ie0 in>ests all /o0er an9 agenc) in the sub?ect 0ho 0oul9 use such an instrument. 7o0e>er reactionar) its histor)D this instrument can be /ut in the ser>ice o6 a /rogressi>e >isionD thus J9e6)ing the habit o6 neutral /rinci/les to entrench eEisting /o0er@N Later s6e &rites= Knothing inherent in la0 ties our han9s=N ('0) a%%ro9in/ o- a met6o3 o- 3octrinal reconstruction. In ot6er &or3sC legal language is /recisel) the 'in9 o6 language that can be cite9 into a re>erse meaningD 0here the re>ersal ta'es a la0 0ith a reactionar) histor) an9 turns it into a la0 0ith a /rogressi>e aim.
toricit) o6 theories an9 'no0le9ge claims 0ithout assuming that 0hat is true o6 our constructions nee9 be true o6 their re6erents (Sayer 199)C !(+). Feminism ma'es claims about the nature o6 social relationsD an9 a99uces >arious sorts o6 e>i9ence 6or these. It /oints out the 6alsit) o6 9ominant accounts o- t6e social &orl3 an3 ar/ues on t6e 8asis o- ri9al accounts t6at 3ee% an3 &i3e c6an/es s6oul3 take %lace. < realist a//roach (an3 an et6ically naturalist one) is there6ore essential to the 6eminist /ro?ect. :o 9eal 0ith the /oststruc; turalist challengeD this realism nee9s to be critical.
*ni>ersalization is inesca/able ( /re6er the critical realism o6 the /erm to 6ormulate emanci/ator) aims Poutanen 1 (Se%%oC Researc6erC 7ca3emy o- ;inlan3C Auly 200'C Critical 0ana/ement Con-erenceC
interculture.-su.e3u/%3-s/%irott5IuinteroP20lis%ectorQan3QciDous.%3-)I0
46e essential o8:ect o- 4ony La&son#s contri8ution to t6e 3ialo/ue is to s6o& 6o& ontolo/ical anal)sis in critical realist st)le is able to bene6it t6e eD%lanatory /oals (mainly meanin/ /oals o- stan3%oint e%istemolo/y)C an3 critical an3 emanci%atory goals o6 6eminist research. In 6is -irst articleC &6ic6 6e mostly uses to sketc6 t6e content o- critical realismC La&son (1999) notes /eneral a9ersion amon/ -eminists to&ar3s realism an3 su//ests a 3ia/nosis o- t6is %6enomenon. 7ccor3in/ to 6is 3ia/nosisC e--ecti9e -eminist critiIue o- /roun3less a %riori uni9ersaliBin/ in researc6 sli3es easily to a %ro8lematic %osition o- o%%osin/ /eneraliBin/ alto/et6er. La&son sus%ects 6eminists to see realism as an ontological un9er0riter o6 all 6alse generalizing C an3 6e stresses t6at onl) nai>e realism is /rone to bac' misle9 uni>ersalizations. In contrastC La&son consi3ers /eneraliBin//uni>ersalizing "is# an inesca/able /art o6 research an9 3etails 6o& un9erstan9ing the basic ontological nature o6 "social# realit) in the critical realist 0a) can hel/ us to attain mo3erately correct or ?usti6ie9 generalizations. Suc6 generalizations concerningC es%eciallyC human natureC nee3s an3 interests areC in t6e 9ie& o- La&sonC necessarily nee9e9 in 6ormulations o6 emanci/ator) /olitical aims.
using a structure9 ontolog)D 0e can un9erstan9 both sameness an9 9i66erence@ 0e can see that multi/le >ariants an3 outcomes can be generate9 on the basis o6 common structures (see La&sonC 2003C %. 2!2). :he abstract le>el 9oesC contra 9an Sta9erenC Eallo0 6or relations an9 9i66erencesFD 6or social structures are constitute9 b) internal relations an3 t6e &6ole %oint o- a8straction is to tease out relations an3 3i--erences t6at ena8le an3
constrain t6e 8liBBar3 o- em%irical 3ataC an3 to 3istin/uis6 &6ic6 t6in/s are merely contin/ently associate3 an3 &6ic6 necessarily or internally relate3 (SayerC 2000). 0oreo9erC in line &it6 So%er#s %ointC &e nee3 to i3enti-y t6e ca%acities o- 6umans an3 in3ee3 ot6er s%ecies 5 -or -louris6in/ an3 su--erin/C an3 t6eir nee3s (La&sonC 2003)C t6us ena8lin/ critiIues o- not :ust economic t6eories 8ut economic %ractices in terms o- t6eir e--ect on %eo%le#s &ell58ein/. 46is accor3s &it6 t6e 7ristotelian %osition o- 0art6a Nuss8aumC &6o 6as ma3e im%ortant contri8utions to -eminist 3e9elo%ment t6eory (Nuss8aumC 2000). 4o 8e sure t6ere are many 3i--erent -orms o-louris6in/ an3 3i--erent cultures %ro9i3e 3i--erent conce%tions o- &6at constitutes -louris6in/C an3 Nuss8aum attem%ts to accommo3ate t6is. >ut not :ust anyt6in/ can 8e %asse3 o-- as -louris6in/. I6 0e 0ere to insist that it 0as /urel) culturall) relati>e
then 0e 0oul9 ha>e no 0arrant 6or using terms li'e Po//ression-. <gain 0e encounter a relation bet0een general human nee9s an9 s/eci6icC contin/ent >ariantsC suc6 as t6e /eneral %syc6olo/ical nee3 -or reco/nition
an3 t6e innumera8le -orms t6at reco/nition takes in 3i--erent cultures. 46is is &6y Nuss8aum 3escri8es 6er conce%tion o- t6e /oo3 as a Rt6ick 9a/ue# oneC -or &6ile it inclu3es many con3itions o- -louris6in/C t6ey are eD%resse3 in terms 9a/ue enou/6 to allo& -or cultural 9ariation an3 6ence a9oi3 et6nocentrism. 46is also seems com%ati8le &it6 9an Sta9eren#s lar/ely -a9oura8le commentary on 7ristotle#s an3 73am Smit6#s 3iscussions o- 9irtuesC &6ic6 mostly a8stract -rom cultural 9ariations (9an Sta9erenC 1999). ,e cannot a>oi9
some 'in9 o6 uni>ersalism. Di66erent cultures /ro>i9e 9i66erent norms but this /resu//oses that one o6 the 9istincti>e 6eatures o6 humans is that the) can un9erstan9C internalise or contest theseD o-ten t6rou/6 eD%loitin/
tensions an3 contra3ictions &it6in cultural 3iscoursesC as in t6e case o- t6e tension 8et&een i3eals o- eIuality an3 /en3er ineIualities. 46e 6eminist literatureC inclu3in/ 9an Sta9eren#s o&n &ork on t6e et6ic o- care /resu//oses that all humans are in nee9 o6 care at >arious times in their li>esC al8eit in 3i--erent &ays. ,eo%le are not :ust 8ein/s &6o 6a9e %re-erences an3 make c6oicesC 8ut 8ein/s &6o are 9ulnera8leC an3 3e%en3ent on care. 46us all economies 3e%en3 onC an3 3istri8ute t6e %ro9ision an3 recei%t o- care. *ne o- t6e contri8utions o- t6is literature is to im%ro9e our economic t6eories 8y enric6in/ our un3erstan3in/ o- &6at it is to 8e 6uman.
a9olescent girls ha>e been >irtuall) ignore9. 7o0e>erD in international la0 there is a 9i66erence bet0een State res/onsibilit) an9 State accountabilit)@ :he State is legall) res/onsible but /oliticall) accountable (Cook. 2000). ,omenSs rights in>ariabl) 6a11 in the /olitical s/here. 7s &ellC researc6 con3ucte3 %ost 19)9 on 0omenSs re/ro9ucti>e healthD >iolence against 0omen an9 abortion 0ere eEclu9e9 6rom the 9ocuments. :heir inclusion to9a) is /roblematic because o6 the /o0er o6 6un9amentalist States suc6 as
Sau3i 7ra8iaC IranC ,akistan an3 t6e Latican to 3elay t6e 3e8ate or e9en annul t6e 6ar35&on articles t6at alrea3y eDistC i- t6e 3ocuments are o%ene3 -or 3iscussion.
gen9ering o6 eE/eriences 9uring 0arD along 0ith the restoration o6 tra9itional gen9ere9 constructs a6ter 0arD more than com/ensate 6or an) 0ar; in9uce9 sun9ering o6 the /atriarchal ta/estr) . "6ile t6e %ractice o- 0ar su//ests t6at it mi/6t encoura/e a ru%ture in t6e /en3ere3 -a8ric o- societyC it o>er0helmingl) contributes to /atriarchal re/ro9uction. Uuestions oriente3 aroun3 t6e emanci%atory %otential o- &ar &6ere &omen are concerne3C t6ere-oreC
run t6e risk o- losin/ a %ers%ecti9e on t6e o9erall role o- mo3ern &ar-are in t6e re%ro3uction o- &omenNs o%%ression.
cam/aigns 6or anti;9iscrimination legislation an9 litigation o6 gen9er;eHuit) claims 0ere signi6icant a9>ances 6or 0omen achie>e9 through the normati>e 9iscourses an3 %u8lic institutions c6aracteristic o6 liberal 9emocracies. "omen also 6a9e stru//le3 in Sout6 7-rica an3 in t6e -ormer So9iet 8loc to secure 8asic 3emocratic /uarantees. :he continue9 integrit) o6 the state s)stems through 0hich these aims ha>e been met is a matter to0ar9 0hich 0omen cannot be in9i66erentC t6eoretically or ot6er&ise.
Greater engagementD not re?ectionD o6 the mo9ern state is 'e) to sol>e Aal90in $3 (0ar/aretC 7ssoc. ,ro- La& S ;S C S%rin/ 199)C E,u8lic "omen an3 t6e ;eminist StateCF 20 .ar9.
"omen#s L.A. !)C % 9+)I0 Feminist /olitical theorists a9>ocate stronger mo9els o6 grou/ re/resentation an3 %artici%ation as a structural
res%onse to t6is %ro8lem. 46ese %ro%osals 3ra& si/ni-icant ins%iration -rom t6e role o- consciousness5raisin/ in -eminist %olitical %ractice. :he intense in>ol>ement these /ro/osals reHuire o6 citizens C to/et6er &it6 t6e locally 8ase3 institutions u%on &6ic6 t6ey 3e%en3C challenge the 3istance3C 6ormalize9 9ecision;ma'ing that 6lattens 0omen-s /artici/ation an9 6urthers the 6alse uni>ersalism o6 the interests re/resente9 in the /ublic s/here . 4o t6at eDtentC
6eminists ha>e /artici/ate9 in the localizing 9iscourse characteristic o6 man) mo9ern attac's on the liberal state. ;urt6erD 6eminists o6ten theorize G0omenF as a 9istinct /olitical classC 8ot6 &it6in eDistin/ state 8or3ers an3 irres%ecti9e o- state citiBens6i%sD thus a9>ocating a 6orm o6 nationalist i9entit) in9e/en9ent o6 territorial a66iliation. ,omen-s interestsC an3 &omen#s commitments an3 con-lictsC t6en are alrea9) 9ee/l) 0o>en into the 0eb o6 contem/orar) contests o>er the nature an9 6uture o6 the liberal state .
,or'ing 0ithin 9ominant institutions sub>erts 9escri/ti>e 9ichotomiesD to inclu9e 0omen Aal90in $3 (0ar/aretC 7ssoc. ,ro- La& S ;S C S%rin/ 199)C E,u8lic "omen an3 t6e ;eminist StateCF 20 .ar9.
"omen#s L.A. !)C % 102)I0
46is &i3e5an/le %resentation ine9ita8ly -or-eits t6e com%leDity an3 nuance o- a more ti/6tly -ocuse3 an3 t6orou/6ly ren3ere3 account o- a sin/le as%ect o- &omen#s %u8lic or %ri9ate eD%erience. Oet I 6o%e to recou% t6at loss 8y t6e /ain in t6eoretical %ers%ecti9e accesse3 8y t6e 8roa3er 9ie&. 7s Carole ,ateman 6as su//este3C such a 6rame0or' ma) also be able to 9econstruct the 9escri/ti>e 9ichotomies that ensnare our theoretical imaginations an9 tell lies about the con9itions o6 0omen-s real li>es . 46e reco/nition that 0omen are situate9 in one 6orm or another Gas 0omenF in 8ot6 %ri9ate an3 %u8lic s%6eres alrea9) begins to
un9ermine 6eminism-s t)/ical un9erstan9ing o6 0omen-s central /olitical challenge as the mo>ement 6rom 0holesale eEclusion to /ublic inclusion. Carole ,ateman eD%lains= E7 -eminist strate/y t6at calls -or t6e inte/ration into citiBens6i% o&omen#s 3istincti9e contri8ution Y rests on t6e assum%tion t6at R&omen# an3 R3i--erence# nee3 to 8e 8rou/6t into t6e %olitical or3er. :he /ertinent Huestion is assume9 to be 0hether seEual 9i66erence is /oliticall) rele>antD or ho0 P9i66erence- coul9 be rele>ant. :hus the >ital Huestion is o>erloo'e9 o6 ho0 to sub>ert an9 change the manner in 0hich 0omen ha>e alrea9) been incor/orate9C an3 so to trans-orm t6e relation 8et&een ReIuality# (men) an3 R3i--erence# (&omen).F 46e -act that the /ublic s/here alrea9) inclu9es 0omenC e9en i- not as -ullC sel-53eterminin/ citiBensC suggests that the matter o6 inclusion is alrea9) more com/licate9 than a single 6ocus on 0omen-s relegation to the /ri>ate s/here might im/l). ConseIuentlyC to t6e eDtent t6at a &i3e5an/le %ers%ecti9e can account -or t6e 3i--erential treatment o- &omen &it6in an3 across t6e
%u8lic an3 %ri9ate s%6eresC t6e more com%re6ensi9e t6e analysis o- &omen#s %olitical situation.
== Feminist Juris/ru9ence==
Juris/ru9ence 1 ! "1/%#
1. :he GrightsF the a66irmati>e /romotes are a 6aLa9e ( the) /er/etuate masculine hierarchies b) sustaining the /ublic//ri>ate 9ichotom) that 'ee/s >ictims o6 >iolence unhear9 4-7are $$ ( rsula 7C LL.>. an3 LL.0. in .uman Ri/6tsC 1iscrimination an3 $mer/ency La& -rom t6e UueenNs
ni9ersity >el-astC ERealiBin/ .uman Ri/6ts -or "omenFC 0use) 7 num8er o- reasons 6a9e 8een %ut -or&ar3 to eD%lain &6y t6e international 6uman ri/6ts community 6as 8een slo& to res%on3 to &omenNs /lo8al 3isa39anta/e. <t the heart o6 the /roblem is the eEclusion o6 0omenSs >oices 6rom the /ublic 0orl9. 0o3ern 6uman ri/6ts la& o&es muc6 to t6e le/acy o- national %ressure -or ci9il an3 %olitical ri/6ts at t6e en3 o- t6e ei/6teent6 an3 early nineteent6 centuries. <s 0omen struggle9 6or access to the /ublic 0orl9 9uring this timeD menSs >oices 0ere in the >anguar9 6or /olitical rights. 10 46e em%6asis on ci9il an3 %olitical ri/6ts re-lecte3 manNs 3esire to re/ulate 6is relations6i% to t6e state an3 to set t6e 8oun3aries o- %ermissi8le state inter-erence in 6is li-e. 11 8ale hegemon) o>er /ublic li6e G$n3 ,a/e 3((H an9 institutions meant that rights came to be 9e6ine9 b) men. 12 :he /resent hierarch) 0ithin human rights la0C &6ic6 /i9es /reater attention to ci9il an3 %olitical ri/6ts as o%%ose3 to economicC social an3 cultural ri/6tsC can be /ercei>e9 as a mani6estation o6 the continuing 9ominance men ha>e o>er the /rocess o6 9e6ining the content o6 rights. 7s .ilary C6arles&ort6 commentsC rights are J9e6ine9 b) the criterion o6 0hat men 6ear 0ill ha//en to them.J 13 46e eDclusion o- &omen -rom t6e %u8lic s%6ere cannot sim%ly 8e note3 as a matter o- 6istorical recor3 8ecause the im/act o6 t6is 6istoric eEclusion o6 0omen continues to be 6elt in the un9erre/resentation o6 0omen in those /ublic 9ecision ma'ing bo9ies o6 the global communit) that 6rame the 9imensions o6 human rights. 1! "6ere &omenNs
9oices are 6ear3 in international -oraC t6ey are 6ear3 in -ora 3esi/ne3 es%ecially to 3eal G$n3 ,a/e 3()H &it6 &omenNs issues an3 not &it6in t6e Kmainstream.K 1' 46is 6as le3 to t6e c6ar/e t6at &omenNs issues are K/6ettoiBe3K &it6in t6e nite3 Nations system55a c6ar/e t6at is su%%orte3 8y t6e -act t6at t6ose international 8o3ies res%onsi8le -or &omenNs issues 6a9e lon/ su--ere3 -rom more limite3 resources an3 &eaker en-orcement %roce3ures t6an mainstream 6uman ri/6ts 8o3ies. 46e eDclusion o- &omenNs 9oices -rom 3e-inin/ t6e content o- 6uman ri/6ts 3iscourse 6as in turn meant t6at 6uman ri/6ts la& 6as e9ol9e3 alon/ a /en3ere3 K-ault5lineK t6at 3istin/uis6es 8et&een t6e %u8lic an3 %ri9ate s%6eres -or t6e %ur%ose o- le/al re/ulation. :he essence o6 the 6eminist critiHue o6 human rights la0 lies in the 0a) in 0hich it me9iates the /ublic an9 /ri>ate s/heres . 7lon/ t6ese linesC t&o main ar/uments 6a9e emer/e3. 1( *ne ar/ument su//ests t6at t6e -ailure o- t6e 6uman ri/6ts system to reac6 &omen results -rom t6e 3e-erence it maintains to&ar3 t6e %ri9ate s%6ere556uman ri/6ts la& %ri9ile/es t6e %u8lic &orl3 &6ile t6e %ri9ate s%6ere is consi3ere3 outsi3e t6e sco%e o- le/al re/ulation. 1) *t6ers ar/ue t6at t6e myt6 o- noninter9ention in t6e %ri9ate s%6ereC &6ic6 6as /ro&n u% in
human rights 9iscourseC sim%ly mas's the gen9ere9 a//lication o6 human rights la0. 1+ .uman ri/6ts la&C accor3in/ to t6is secon3 ar/umentC does attem%t to re/ulate t6e %ri9ate s%6ereC 8ut 6as sim%ly -aile3 to 3o so in res%ect o- issues t6at %articularly touc6 &omenNs li9es. In eit6er caseC 8ot6 t6eories ar/ue t6at 0omenSs issues ha>e not been ta'en seriousl) b) the human rights communit). 19 46e eDtent to &6ic6 t6e
%u8lic/%ri9ate 3ic6otomy 6as s6a%e3 t6e 6uman ri/6ts e3i-ice is mani-est in t6e t6eory o- state res%onsi8ility -or 6uman ri/6ts a8uses. >ecause 6uman ri/6ts la& is concerne3 &it6 re/ulatin/ t6e eDercise o- %u8lic %o&erC it -ollo&s t6at only t6e state can 8e 6el3 res%onsi8le -or 6uman ri/6ts a8uses. 46ose a8uses committe3 8y %ri9ate actors &it6in t6e %ri9ate s%6ere 3o not attract t6e attention an3 s6ame o- t6e 6uman ri/6ts community. *- courseC &omen o%erate across t6e %u8lic an3 G$n3 ,a/e 3(+H %ri9ate s%6eres an3 t6e 8oun3aries o- t6ose &orl3s 3o not remain -iDe3C 8ut t6e im%ortance o- t6e 3istinction in 6uman ri/6ts la& 8et&een %u8lic an3 %ri9ate is t6at -or many &omen t6e %u8lic s%6ere 6as scant si/ni-icance to t6eir li9es. 20 :he maintenance o6 this /ublic//ri>ate 9ichotom) 0or's Jto mu66le an9 o6ten
com/letel) silence the >oices o6 0omen.K 21 0oreo9erC it is an Karti-icial 3i9i3e.K 22 ;or as Cat6erine 0ac<innon 6as ar/ue3C JNtOo act as i6 Nthe state is all there is to /o0erO /ro9uces an eEce/tionall) ina9eHuate 9e6inition 6or human rights 0hen so much o6 the secon9 class status o6 0omen . . . is 9one b) men to 0omen /rior to eE/ress state in>ol>ement.J 23
Juris/ru9ence 1 ! "2/%#
2. 8ilitaristic >iolence 9ue to /atriarchal >alues ine>itabl) results in eEtinction S/retna' 5$ (C6arleneC 07 in $n/lis6 at >erkeleyC E$D%osin/ Nuclear ,6allaciesC %. (0)
"omen an3 men can li9e to/et6er an3 can relate to ot6er societies in any num8er o- cultural con-i/urationsC 8ut i/norance o- t6e con-i/urations t6emsel9es locks a %o%ulace into 8lin3 a36erence to t6e status Iuo. In t6e nuclear a/eC suc6 uneDamine3 acce%tance may 8e -atal as cerZtain cultural assum%tions in our o&n society are %us6in/ us closer an3 closer to &ar. Since a ma:or &ar coul3 no& easily 8rin/ on massi9e anni6ilation oalmost unt6inka8le %ro%ortionsC &6y are 3iscussions in our national -orums a33ressin/ t6is ma3ness o- t6e nuclear arms race limite3 to matters o- 6ar3&are an3 statisticsV 7 more com%re6ensi9e analysis is nee3e35 unlessC as t6e 3oomsayers claimC &e collecti9ely 6ar8or a 3eat6 &is6 an3 no not really &ant to look closely at 3ynamics %ro%ellin/ us stea3ily to&ar3 t6e 8rink o- eDtinction. :he cause o6 nuclear arms /roli6eration is militarism. ,hat is the cause o6 militarismT :he tra9itional militarist eE/lanation is that the Gmasters o6 0arF in the militar)in9ustrial com/leE /ro6it enormousl) 6rom 9e6ense contracts an9 other 0ar /re/arations. < ca/italist econom) /erio9icall) reHuires the economic boon that large;scale go>ernment s/en9ingD ca/itol in>estmentD an9 0or'er sacri6ice /ro9uce 9uring a crisis o6 0ar. In a33itionC 7merican arme3 -orcesC &6et6er nuclear or con9entionalC are statione3 &orl3&i3e to %rotect t6e status IuoC &6ic6 reIuires 9ast an3 interlockin/ 7merican cor%orate interests. Suck an economic analysis alone in ina3eIuateC as t6e recent res%onses to t6e nuclear arms race t6at i/nore t6e cultural orientation o- t6e nations in9ol9e3= :he) are /atriarchies. 8ilitarism an9 0ar6are are continual 6eatures o6 /atriarchal societ) because the) re6lect an9 instill /atriarchal >alues an9 6ul6ill essential nee9s o6 such a s)stem. <c'no0le9ging the conteEt o6 /atriarchal conce/tualizations that 6ee9 militarism is 6irst ste/ to0ar9 re9ucing their im/act an9 /reser>ing li6e on .arth.
Juris/ru9ence 1 ! "%/%#
%. :he alternati>e is to >ote negati>e. Re?ecting to act on masculine conce/tions o6 the 0orl9 allo0s 6or us to utilize a gen9ere9 anal)sis on Huestions o6 rights an9 >iolence <mirthalingam 1 (<umaralin/amC 7ssociate ,ro-essor an3 1irector o- International ,ro/ramsC ;aculty o- La&
an3 7ssociateC 7sia Researc6 InstituteC National ni9ersity o- Sin/a%oreC E"omen#s Ri/6tsC International NormsC an3 1omestic Liolence= 7sian ,ers%ecti9esF) 1omestic 9iolence 6as 8een on t6e /lo8al a/en3a -or se9eral 3eca3esC an3 in t6e last t&oC 6as 8een t6e su8:ect o- consi3era8le re-orm acti9ity in 7siaC %articularly in Sin/a%ore an3 0alaysiaC &6ic6 6a9e enacte3 le/islation to 3eal &it6 t6e %ro8lem.1 "6ile 3omestic 9iolence a--ects 9arious %arties (inclu3in/ %artnersC 2 %arentsC c6il3ren an3 eDten3e3 -amily)C t6is article is limite3 to %artner 9iolence an3 ar/ues -or an en6ance3 /en3er analysis o- t6e %ro8lem in t6is re/ion. 46e e9i3ence su//ests t6at 3omestic 9iolence 3is%ro%ortionately a--ects &omen as 9ictims. 46e "orl3 .ealt6 *r/aniBationC in its -irst "orl3 Re%ort on Liolence an3 .ealt6 in 2002C re9eale3 t6at 8et&een !0 %ercent an3 )0 %ercent o- &omen &6o 3ie 3ue to 6omici3e are kille3 8y current or -ormer %artners.3 46e N S%ecial Ra%%orteur on Liolence 7/ainst "omen 6as 3e-ine3 3omestic 9iolence in /en3er terms as E9iolence %er%etrate3 in t6e 3omestic s%6ere &6ic6 tar/ets &omen 8ecause o- t6eir role &it6in t6at s%6ere or as 9iolence &6ic6 is inten3e3 to im%actC 3irectly an3 ne/ati9elyC on &omen &it6in t6e 3omestic s%6ere.F+:he signi6icance o6 using gen9er as a basis o6 anal)sis is that it 6orces a /ara9igmatic shi6t a0a) 6rom 9omestic >iolence anal)sis best ca/ture9 b) the 6ollo0ing o8ser9ation= EInstea9 o6 as'ing 0h) he battersD there is a ten9enc) to as' 0h) she sta)s.F1 < gen9ere9 anal)sis com/els us instea9 to Huestion 0h) men resort to >iolence an9 0h) >iolence against 0omen occurs an9 is tolerate9 in man) societies. Restructuring the 9ebate in this 0a) is >ital 6or meaning6ul legal re6ormD es/eciall) 6rom the /ers/ecti>es o6 criminal ?ustice an9 human rights .( :he 'e) to un9erstan9ing 3omestic >iolence 6rom a gen9er /ers/ecti>e is to a//reciate that the root cause o6 >iolence lies in an uneHual /o0er relationshi/ bet0een men an9 0omen that is com/oun9e9 in male 9ominate9 societies. 7s note3 recentlyC EUiolence is . . . a sign o6 the struggle 6or the maintenance o6 certain 6antasies o6 i9entit) an9 /o0er. Uiolence emerges C in t6is analysisC as 9ee/l) gen9ere9 an9 seEualise9.F) In many :uris3ictionsC an3 %articularly in 7siaC 3omestic 9iolence is seen as a %ri9ate matter an3 consi3erations o- -amilyC cultureC or reli/ion ten3 to %re9ail o9er &omen#s interests. 46is article seeks to %romote le/al re-orm in t6is area (8ot6 in terms o- su8:ect matter an3 t6e re/ion) 8y a33ressin/ international normsC /en3er analysisC an3 transcultural 9alues. Section II o- t6is article analyBes t6e recently enacte3 3omestic 9iolence la&s in 0alaysia an3 Sin/a%ore. "6ile t6e legal re6orms in 8ot6 :uris3ictions 6a9e 8een %ro/ressi9eC t6ey ha>e also been hin9ere9 b) /ercei>e9 cultural constraints an9 an ina9eHuate a//reciation o6 the gen9ere9 nature o6 3omestic >iolence. Section III 3ra&s on 6eminist theories o6 -amily 9iolence an3 international human rights 9iscourse to create an alternati>e narrati>e that can better a9>ance legal re6orm in the region. >y 3e-inin/ -amily 9iolence 8ot6 as a /en3er issue an3 a 6uman ri/6ts issueC t6e locus o- 3omestic 9iolence is s6i-te3 a&ay -rom t6e %ri9ate 3omain to t6e %u8licC a critical ste% in t6e 7sian conteDt. 46e t6eoretical an3 %6iloso%6ical ar/uments are 3esi/ne3 to %ro9i3e t6e tools &it6 &6ic6 to c6allen/e certain 7sian assum%tions a8out 3omestic 9iolenceC -amily an3 cultural 9aluesC as &ell as t6e %u8lic/%ri9ate 3i9i3e t6at 3e-ines t6e 8oun3aries o- State re/ulation. 46is article -inally su//ests t6at 7sian 9alues are not incom%ati8le &it6 6uman ri/6ts 3iscourse in /eneral or &omen#s ri/6ts in %articular.
&in' ( State
:he state is inherentl) /atriarchal an9 creates a 6aLa9e o6 granting rights to assuage 0omen an9 continue their >ictimization. Rho9e $+ (1e8ora6 LC ,ro-essor o- La& at Stan-or3 ni9ersityC E;eminism an3 t6e stateF) ,A
< -inal line o- 6eminist critiHue challenges liberalismSs 3e-erence to in3i9i3ual %re-erences an3 its insistence that the state remain neutral Ge11+9H 8et&een suc6 %re-erences an3 8et&een com%etin/ 9isions o- t6e /oo3 li-e. Li8eral -rame&orks -reIuently take &omenNs o8:ecti9es as /i9en an3 assume t6at &omen can enlist t6e state on t6eir 8e6al- t6rou/6 /rou% le9era/e in 3emocratic %rocesses. n33 Oet to an im%ortant eDtentC &omenNs %re-erences are socially constructe3 an3 constraine3. :he state 9oes not sim/l) res/on9 to eE/resse9 9esiresI it /la)s an acti>e role in legitimatingD su//ressingD or re9irecting them. <ttem/ts to challenge ineHualit) through con>entional 9emocratic measures 6all short 0hen subor9inate grou/s a9a/t or accommo9ate their /re6erences to the uneHual o//ortunities a>ailable . n3! 7s <at6y ;er/uson %uts itC liberalism J/rocee9s as i6 0omen 0ere alrea9) 6ree . . . &6en t6e entire -orce o- t6e 6eminist critiHue is to sho0 /recisel) the o//osite. ,art o- t6e %erniciousness o- -emininity in our society is t6at it %ro3uces %eo%le &6o claim to c6oose &6at t6ey are su%%ose3 to &ant.K n3' Contrary to con9entional &is3omC most >ictims o6 9iscrimination 9o not i9enti6) themsel>es as such. In3i9i3uals /enerally &ant to 8elie9e in a K:ust &orl3KJ t6ey %re-er to a9oi3 t6e 6ostilityC as &ell as t6e 3iminis6e3 sense o- e--icacy an3 sel-5esteemC t6at ackno&le3/in/ oneNs 9ictimiBation ty%ically entails. n3(
:he state ine>itabilit) mani/ulates la0s in a masculine /ers/ecti>e. Rho9e $+ (1e8ora6 LC ,ro-essor o- La& at Stan-or3 ni9ersityC E;eminism an3 t6e stateF) ,A
In many le-t -eminist accountsC the state is a /atriarchal institution in the sense that it re6lects an9 institutionalizes male 9ominance. 8en control /ositions o6 o--icial /o0er an9 menSs interests 9etermine ho0 that /o0er is eEercise9. 7ccor3in/ to Cat6arine 0ac<innonC the stateSs in>ocation o6 neutralit) an9 ob?ecti>it) ensures thatD JNtOhose 0ho ha>e 6ree9oms li'e eHualit)D libert)D /ri>ac) an9 s/eech sociall) 'ee/ them legall)D 6ree o6 go>ernmental intrusion.K n1' In t6is 9ie&C Jthe state /rotects male /o0er Nb)O a//earing to /rohibit its eEcesses 0hen necessar) to its normalization. K n1( SoC -or eDam%leC to t6e eDtent t6at a8ortion -unctions Kto -acilitate male seDual access to &omenC access to a8ortion &ill 8e controlle3 8y Na man or 46e 0an.NK n1)
:he state marginalizes 6eminist /ers/ecti>es an9 acts arrogantl) on their behal6 Fellmeth 2' (7aron ga9ierC >.7. in Social Sciences -rom t6e ni9ersity o- Cali-orniaC E;eminism an3
International La&= 46eoryC 0et6o3olo/yC an3 Su8stanti9e Re-ormF) ,A Some 6eminists also criticiBe state so9erei/nty on %ractical /roun3s. 46ey claim that the state cannot re/resent 0omen-s nee9s on an international le>el because 0omen are not re/resente9 a9eHuatel) at the state le>el.!1 *89iouslyC t6is %ro8lem is 8est a33resse3 8y some6o& increasin/ eIual re%resentation in t6e state 6alls o- %o&er. *t6ers ar/ue t6at the state re/resents a male conce/t o6 autonom) an9 9isconnecte9nessD an9 9oes not re6lect the 6emale-s >ision o6 hersel6 as Gconnecte9 to others through a 0eb o6 relationshi/s.F!2 46is 9ie& a39ances t6e eDtreme %ro%osition t6at men generall) 9o not >alue an9 i9enti6) 0ith human relationshi/s as much as 0omenD an9 ta'es issue 0ith the ra9ical 6eminist notion that men an9 0omen are not 6un9amentall) 9i66erent . 7 -inal :usti-ication -or a8olis6in/ state so9erei/nty relates to arme3 con-lictJ E%u8licF international con-licts an3 E%ri9ateF internal con-licts 8ot6 6arm &omen at least eIually. 46e %u8lic/%ri9ate 3istinction sim%ly 3oes not re-lect &omen#s actual eD%eriences o- &ar. !3
&in' ; State
:he rights o6 GeHualit)F a//ortione9 to us b) the state 6ail to ac'no0le9ge the source o6 0omen-s eEclusion an9 there6ore maintain it Sn)9er % (0oseC La& S o- ConnecticutC -e.uconn.e3u/3ocuments/$ssayP20Connections/20035
200(/Sny3er.%3-)I0 although our legal s)stem contains la0s that ensure eHualit) bet0een men an9 0omenD these la0s 9o not /er6orm the 6unction 6or 0hich the) are inten9e9C because the) em/lo) a conce/tion o6 eHualit) that is biase9 in 6a>or o6 male 9ominance . 4ur s)stem concei>es o6 eHualit) as a state o6 SamenessC in &6ic6 males an3 -emales are /rante3 i3entical ri/6ts &it6
In K4o&ar3s a ;eminist Auris%ru3enceCK 0ac<innon ar/ues t6at res%ect to a situation. Corres%on3in/lyC ineIuality is construe3 as a state o- 3i--erence. *n t6is Ksameness/3i--erenceK conce%tion oeIualityC males an3 -emales in to3ayNs society are eIualC i.e.C t6e la& /uarantees t6em t6e same ri/6ts. .o&e9erC 0ac<innon 8elie9es t6at this is eHualit) in name onl)C t6at 0omen 9o not ha>e true eHualit)D an3 t6us t6at t6ere is somet6in/ &ron/ &it6 our /en3er eIuality la&s (23+5!2). o- 3i--erence. *n t6is Ksameness/3i--erenceK conce%tion o- eIualityC males an3 -emales in to3ayNs society are eIualC i.e.C t6e la& /uarantees t6em t6e same ri/6ts. .o&e9erC 0ac<innon 8elie9es t6at t6is is eIuality in name onlyC t6at &omen 3o not 6a9e true eIualityC an3 t6us t6at t6ere is somet6in/ &ron/ &it6 our /en3er eIuality la&s (23+5!2). *n t6e sameness/3i--erence conce%tion o- eIualityC our le/al system 3oes not e9en con-ront &6at 0ac<innon %erhei9es as t6h real ro8lem &it6 %orno/ra%6yC let alone &ork to resol9e It. 46e realIty o- hornenNs con3ition &it6 res%ect to %orno/ra%6y is one o- su8or3inationC an3 our conce%tion o- eIualityC 0ac<innon ar/uesC must re-lect t6is. "6en &e make t6e re59ision -rom eIuality as sameness/3i--erence to eIuality as 3ominance/su8missionC %orno/ra%6y can no lon/er 8e seen as a ;irst 7men3ment issue (2!)). *nce t6is c6an/e is ma3eC our /en3er eIuality le/islation &ill reco/niBe t6e ineIuality in9ol9e3 in %orno/ra%6yC an3 &ill 3eman3 t6at it 8e remo9e3. "it6 0ac<innonNs ar/ument in min3C one can see clearly t6e %arallels. 8et&een t6e. c.once%hhl re9ihion s6e %ro%oses an3 Ric6=s %rescri%tI*n -or t6e -emIllst re5LISI*n o- lIterature. 46e -irst t6ree ste%s m Ric6Ns al/orit6m instruct t6e re59iser to Ktake t6e &ork -irst o- all as a clue to 6o& &e li9eC 6o& &e 6a9e 8een li9in/C 6o& &e 6a9e 8een le3 to ima/ine oursel9esK ((29). "e see t6is clearly in 0ac<innonNs essayJ s6e 8e/ins 8y 3iscussin/ &6at t6e la& tells us a8out t6e con3ition an3 status o- &omen to3ay. Ric6 ur/es t6e re5 9iser o- a teDt to consi3er K6o& &e 6a9e 8een li9in/K ((29)C an3 accor3in/lyC 0ac<innon %oints out some o- t6e &ays in &6ic6 &omen 6a9e 8een eDclu3e3 -rom t6e construction o- le/al systems. K:hose 0ith /o0er in ci>il societ)CK 0ac<innon &ritesC Knot usuall) 0omenD 9esign its norms an9 institutionsD 0hich become the status Huo K (23+). S6e notes t6at
0omenD an o6ten /o0erless 6action o6 a societ)D are normall) eEclu9e9 6rom the 0riting o6 constitutions an9 legislationD an9 /rece9ents establishe9 Jbe6ore 0omen 0ere /ermitte9 to >ote G
... H are consi3ere3 9ali3 8ases -or 3e-eatin/ Nun%rece3ente3N inter%retations or initiati9es -rom &omenNs %oint o- 9ie&K (23+). 46rou/6 %rocesses suc6 as t6eseC 0omen ha>e been 'e/t 6rom /artici/ating in the 6ormation o6 our legal s)stemD a s)stem 0hich no0D un3er t6e /uise o- eIualityC 0or's to maintain the subor9ination o6 0omen to men.
<n a//eal to 0omen-s rights in the current legal s)stem can onl) rein6orce male 9ominance :uc'er 5 (Au3it6C La& S 2eor/eto&nC *cto8er 200+C "omenC ;amily an3 2en3er in Islamic La&C %. ')I0
Not all critics o- li8eral -eminist t6eory accentuate t6e %ositi9e in &oman5 centere3ness. Cat6arine 0ac<innonC -or oneC seems to caution a/ainst romanticiBin/ t6e eD%erience o- &omen e9en as s6e em8races t6e %osition t6at t6e &oman#s %oint o- 9ie& 6as 8een i/nore3 in le/al t6ou/6t an3 %ractice. 46e -un3amental %ro8lemC -or 0ac<innonC is t6at the legal s)stem enshrines a gen9er hierarch) o6 subor9ination o6 the 6emale b) the male. 46is is not :ust 3i--erenceC it is 3ominance. :he la0 re6lects an9 enables social an9 /olitical institutions o6 ineHualit)= &omen /et uneIual %ayC 3o 3isres%ecte3 &orkC an3 are seDually a8use3. Such ineHualities /rece9e the la0D 0hich subseHuentl) in the case o6 the liberal state legit; imates the i9ea o6 non;inter6erence 0ith the status Huo an3 t6e correction o- only t6ose ineIualities actually create3 8y %rior le/al action. In3ee3C t6e li8eral notion o- %ri9acyC t6at restrains t6e state an3 t6e la& -rom enterin/ into t6e E%ri9ateF &orl3 o8o3y an3 6omeC %ermits t6e o%%ression an3 a8use o- &omen to %rocee3 a%ace in t6e 9enueC t6e 6omeC &6ere it is at its most %er9asi9e.
<n) a//eal to abstract rights in such a conteEt o6 social ineHualit) can onl) authorize an9 rein6orce male 9ominance.) 46e 6istory o- &omen#s eD%erienceC t6enC is a ne/ati9e one &6ic6 &e 3ra& on to re9eal 6arms an3 a8uses=
t6ere is little sense in 0ac<innon#s &ritin/ o- a su%erior -emale et6ics o- connection t6at can ser9e as an alternate 8asis -or le/al 3e9elo%ment. StillC t6ere is a 9ery real role -or -eminist :uris%ru3ence 0ac<innon critiIues the Gtra9itional le6tF >ie0 t6at la& can onl) re6lect eEisting social relations. Rat6erC a /roacti>e 6eminist ?uris/ru9ence nee9s to /ush 6or substanti>e rights 6or 0omen. 4o t6e eDtent -eminist la& em8o3ies &omen#s %oint o- 9ie&C it &ill 8e sai3 t6at its la& is not neutral. It &ill 8e sai3 t6at it un3ermines t6e le/itimacy o- t6e le/al system. >ut t6e le/itimacy o- eDistin/ la& is 8ase3 on -orce at &omen#s eD%ense. "omen 6a9e ne9er consente3 to its rule su//estin/ t6at t6e system#s le/itimacy nee3s re%air t6at &omen are in a %osition to %ro9i3e. It &ill 8e sai3 t6at -eminist la& is s%ecial %lea3in/ -or a %articular /rou% an3 one cannot start t6at or &6ere &ill it en3. >ut eDistin/ la& is alrea3y s%ecial %lea3in/ -or a %articular /rou%C &6ere it 6as en3e3.+
&in' ( State
:he la0s o6 the state are ba9 ( the) ignore the in9i>i9ualD conceal /ain an9 su66ering an9 because the) gi>e rights the) can re>o'e rights Fellmeth 2' (7aronC Int. Rel. S OaleC .uman Ri/6ts Uuarterly 22(3)C %. ((()I0
46e secon3 -eminist analytical met6o3 is kno&n as K-eminist %ractical reasonin/.K 7ccor3in/ to one %ro%onentC suc6 reasonin/ 9alues in3i9i3ualiBe3 -act5-in3in/ o9er 8ri/6t5line rulesC reasonin/ -rom conteDtC an3 accountin/ -or t6e %ers%ecti9es o- t6e %o&erless. 2!
Feminist ?uris/ru9ence teaches res/ect 6or 9i>erse /ers/ecti>es because 6eminism itsel6 is an JotherJ /ers/ecti>eC an3 it -ocuses on real5&orl3 eD%eriences o- &omen 8ecause t6e abstract theories characteristic o6 male; 9ominate9 economicsD sociolog)D or /olitical science o6ten generalize about social con9itions or e66ectsD ignoring gen9er;base9 9is/arities. 0ost -eminists s6are t6is in3ucti9eC conteDtual met6o3olo/y -ocusin/ on &omenNs
%ers%ecti9es an3 eD%eriences. 46e uniIuely K-eministK as%ect o- -eminist %ractical reasonin/ is its -ocus on t6e eDclu3e3 Kot6erCK not its met6o3olo/y. 21 Rules are abhorrent %er se because the) o/erate 9e9ucti>el) an9 gloss o>er in9i>i9ual /ain. 2( For eEam/leC <at6arine >artlett o8:ects to bright;line la0s reHuirin/ minors to obtain /arental consent be6ore see'ing an abortion 8ecause o- t6e Kactual accounts o- t6e &renc6in/ circumstancesK o- a minor. 2) >artlett reco/niBes t6e 9alue o- rules as Knecessities 8ecause &e are not al&ays /oo3 :u3/esCK t6at isC 8ecause sometimes t6e collecti9e :u3/ment osociety is su%erior to t6at o- many in3i9i3uals. 2+ .o&e9erC s6e 3e%lores t6eir unnecessar) uni6ormit)C &6ic6 /re>ents societ) 6rom 9ealing 0ith in9i>i9ual circumstances that may cause nee9less su66ering. I6 nothing is a Jgi>enDJ nothing can be ta'en a0a).
:he rights gi>en to 0omen b) the state are inherentl) /atriarchal :uc'er 5 (Au3it6C La& S 2eor/eto&nC *cto8er 200+C "omenC ;amily an3 2en3er in Islamic La&C %. 3)I0
46e a%%roac6 &it6 t6e lon/est linea/eC reac6in/ -rom mi35Lictorian times u% to t6e %resentC is t6at o- li8eral -eminist t6inkers. 46e li8eral tra3itionC %articularly %rominent in t6e 7n/lo57merican conteDtC acce%ts la& an3 le/al institutions as 8ase3 on %rinci%les o- rationalityC o8:ecti9ityC an3 -airness in t6eir 3ealin/s &it6 an autonomous le/al su8:ect. :he /roblemC as -ar as &omen an3 /en3er are concerne3C is that certain as/ects o6 la0 ha>e built;inC an3 o-ten 6i33enC ineHualities bet0een men an9 0omen as a result o6 the e>olution o6 the la0 in a /atriarchal social en>iron; ment. 46e -eminist taskC as -ar as li8eral t6eorists are concerne3C is to i3enti-y an3 correct t6ose as%ects o- la& t6at 8elie t6e li8eral %romise o- eIuality an3 -ree3om o- in3i9i3uals 8e-ore t6e la& 8y 3iscriminatin/ a/ainst &omen. $Dam%les o- suc6 3iscrimination inclu3e= 3isa39anta/in/ &omen 8y allocatin/ -e&er material resources to t6emC as &as lon/ t6e case in %ro%erty settlements in 3i9orce casesJ :u3/in/ men an3 &omen#s similar actions in 3i--erent &aysC as in criminaliBin/ t6e 8e6a9ior o- t6e -emale %rostitute 8ut not 6er male clientJ an3 assigning men an9 0omen to 9istinct social rolesD as in the seE;base9 classi6ications o6 Gbrea90innerF an9 Ghome; ma'er .F 4nl) 0ith the era9ication o6 such 9iscriminator) la0s an9 legal categories 0ill 0omen be able to realize the liberal /romise o6 eHual treat; ment as in9i>i9uals 0ith eHual rights. 46e task is one o- i3enti-ication osuc6 le/al ineIualities an3 t6eir correction so that 0omen can realize the /romises o6 6ree9om an9 eHualit) ma9e b) the liberal state an9 its legal institutions.1
:he state-s stan9ar9s o6 authorit) ?usti6) men-s right to eEercise authorit) o>er 0omen Sla>in $0 (Sara6C ,oli Sci S >u--alo State Colle/eC "inter 1990C Aournal o- "omen#s .istory 1(3)C %. 12))I0
;or Cat6arine 0ac<innonC the stateSs most basic stan9ar9s o6 authorit) summarize the male >ie0/ointSs /ur/oses. :he /ur/ose o6 ha>ing courts is to eEhibit the relationshi/ o6 men an9 0omen re9uce9 to its ?uris9ictions. 46ese :uris3ictions inclu3e t6e 8iolo/ical an3 %syc6olo/ical 8ut not o-ten t6e %oliticalC &6ic6 is t6e 3omain o- men alone. !ourtsS 9ecisions re9eal t6e eDtent to &6ic6D as 0ac<innon %uts it in anot6er conteDtC KseDuality is /en3ere3 as /en3er is seDualiBe3CK33 8y ?usti6)in/ menSs right to eEercise authorit). 46is is &6at is meant 8y le/itimiBation. Since legal institutions hel/ regularize menSs /o0er o>er time b) 9emonstrating male ?uris9ictions C t6at isC t6e 3omains &it6in &6ic6 men eDercise aut6orityC t6ey constitute an im%ortant 6istorical source -or inter%retin/ t6e %o&er relation o/en3er. 0ac<innon ar/ues t6at t6e a3:u3ication o- /rie9ances turns on K&6ose meanin/ &ins.K3! 7n a6istorical an3C t6ere-oreC uni3iminensional reality is assume3 to un3erlie la&C an3 grie>ances that arise un9er a go>ernment o6 la0s 0ill be settle9 ?u9iciall) in an outsi3e5o-56istory atmos%6ere o- im%ar5 tiality. 46is %resume3 im%artiality is ma3e all t6e more %ossi8le to3ay 8ecause increasingl) >iolent states ha>e merge9 /ers/ecti>e an9 situation . :he 9e6initi>e re/resentation o6 stateC societyC %u8lic interestC an3 /eneral &el-are is Jmale /ursuit o6 control o>er 0omenSs seEualit).K3' "omen 3o not control &6at is 3one to usJ menSs seEualit) is inse/arable 6rom coercion an9 >iolence.
&in' ( State
&a0 cannot re9ress >iolence against 0omen or /re>ent its occurrence ( it 0ill onl) continue to eEclu9e 0omen-s interests Sla>in $0 (Sara6C ,oli Sci S >u--alo State Colle/eC "inter 1990C Aournal o- "omen#s .istory 1(3)C %. 12()I0
;or "estC 0hate>er /rotection Rule o6 &a0 /ro>i9es the in9i>i9ual manD bent on se/arationD 6rom threat o6 annihilationiMt6is %rotection is a %rimary t6rust o- Rule o- La&iMit 0ill not re9ress harms eE/erience9 b) 0omen an9 /re>ent their 6uture occurrence. or is /rotection 6orthcoming 6rom Rule o6 &a0C in t6e name o- sel-5/o9ernanceC &ort6&6ile to &omen in t6eir 6istorical connecte3ness. 4o /i9e one 6istorical eDam%le= t6e National "omanNs ,arty resiste3 t6e %rotection o- &orkin/ &omen t6rou/6 in3us5 trial le/islation t6at &as sou/6t 8y 9irtually all ma:or &omenNs or/aniBa5 tions a-ter 1920. In 1923C in %re-erence to %rotectionC t6e "omanNs ,arty (N",) intro3uce3 an eIual ri/6ts amen3ment in or3er toC in Crystal $ast5 manNs &or3sC Kesta8lis6 t6e %rinci%le t6at in3ustrial le/islation s6oul3 a%%ly to all &orkers ... in any /i9en occu%ation an3 not to &omen &orkers alone.K22 N", 8elie9e3 t6at /rotecti>e legislation 9iscriminate9 against 0omen in the /ai9 0or'6orceC23 &6ile /rou%s suc6 as t6e National "omenNs 4ra3e nion Lea/ue %lace3 t6e 8lame on &omanNs 3e-icient or/aniBation an3 s%ecial nee3s as 0ot6er o- t6e Race.2! <lthough ,P 6oun9 0omen to be analogous to menC23 it recognize9 that 0omenSs legal 9isabilit) in earning their 0a) 2( ha9 substantial e66ect on the stan9ar9 o6 li>ing &it6 &6ic6 many &omen an3 t6eir -amilies 6a3 to /et 8y.2) (7ccor3in/ to "estC the JconstitutionJ or a basic legal 9ocument o6 /atriarch) is %orno/ra%6yC &6ic6 is &6y %orno/ra%6y is not seriously %rose5 cute332iMto the eEclusion o6 0omenSs interests an9 9enial o6 an) /otential 6or balancing.#
:he a66-s insistance that rights must be gi>en us b) the state is central to /atriarch) Sla>in $0 (Sara6C ,oli Sci S >u--alo State Colle/eC "inter 1990C Aournal o- "omen#s .istory 1(3)C %. 129)I0
Co%elon ar/ues t6at an et6ical sine Iua non is nee3e3 to 3e-eat t6e se/aration o6 /ublic an9 /ri>ate s/heres o6 human acti>it) t6at is central to /atriarchal /ers/ecti>e. In t6e &estern &orl3C t6e %ositi9ist treatment o- /ublic an9 /ri>ate s/heres o6 human acti>it) as se/arate an9 9istinct constitutes a -orm o- or3er an3 also a set o6 means 6or /atriarchs to try to or9er an9 maintain relationshi/s among /eo/le. 46is or3er inclu3es 8ot6 t6e emotional an3 t6e rational an3 se%arates t6em -rom one anot6er. In a &orl3 so or3ere3C 0omen are /lace9 in /ri>ate an9 men in /ublic s/heres. $9en t6ou/6 ineIuities eDist amon/ men in %u8lic an3 &omen in %ri9ate s/heresD to 0omen 6all Jthe
Semotional laborS o6 house0or' an9 chil9renDJ to menD Jthe Sintellectual an9 manual laborS o6 science an9 /ublic li6e.K100 Rationality attac6es to t6e scienti-icC t6e essentialC t6e masculine. $motion is nonscien5 ti-icC 3is%ensa8leC an3
-eminine.101 >y se%aratin/ t6emsel9es -rom o8:ects t6ey seek to classi-y an3 measureC %ositi9ists try to maintain 8oun3aries t6ey 6a9e set. :he /ositi>ist bi6urcation o6 human acti>it) into se/arate9 s/heres o6 /ublic an9 /ri>ate /ro9uces sets o6 9ual stan9ar9s102 t6at /o9ern social relations an3 rely on lo/ic 3e%en3ent on 6ierarc6ical 3eri9ations -rom 3i--erence.103 .S. menC likely &6ite an3 7n/lo5SaDonC mostly %ro%ertie3C a8le58o3ie3C in t6eir mi33le yearsC $n/lis65s%eakin/C an3 6eteroseDualC may %artici%ate in %u8lic %rocessesC t6e mainstreamJ &omen/ot6ers %ole3 out o- t6e mainstream or %re9ente3 -rom enterin/ it 3es%ite &6at t6ey may 6a9e 8een le3 to eD%ectC are assi/ne3C to t6e eDtent %ossi8leC to %ri9ate %lacesC to 8y&ays seen as antit6etical to 8ar/ainin/ an3 accommo3ation in %u8lic realms.10! ,omen/ ot6ers are assume9 unHuali6ie9 6or or treate9 as 9isHuali6ie9 6rom the 0or' o6 su/eror9inate re/resentation.10'
:he basis o6 the rights gi>en to us b) the state is /atriarchal Sla>in $0 (Sara6C ,oli Sci S >u--alo State Colle/eC "inter 1990C Aournal o- "omen#s .istory 1(3)C %. 129)I0
R6on3a Co%elon -in3s the
*.S. !onstitution"is# a 'e) organizing 9e>ice in 9eterminations o6 autonom)/9e/en9ence an3 material in3e%en3ence/ser9i5 tu3e. 46ere-oreC 6er &ork is essential rea3in/ -or .S. le/al 6istorians . :he /remises o6 the FramersS /atriarchal Jun9erstan9ingJ /resent a /o0er6ul set o6 limitations t6at
o%erate at 8ot6 institutional an3 i3eolo/ical le9els. 7s 3i3 A. 0ars6all in 6is &i3ely %u8liciBe3 s%eec6 3urin/ t6e 19+) >icentennial ot6e ConstitutionC!2 Co%elon %oints out t6at the Framers sought to /reser>e the /ri>ilege o6 their classC raceC an3 seE.!3 7lt6ou/6 our i9eas about 0hat constitutes eHualit) 6a9e c6an/e3 across timeC t6ey are accommo3ate3C to t6e eDtent the) areD in a 6rame0or' not con9uci>e to change or 6eminist historical anal)sis . Neit6er eIuality oo%%ortunityC in3i9i3ual &ort6C nor %ri9ate %ro%erty &ill ser9e to 3is/uise t6e c6aracter o- t6e ori/inal Constitu5 tion an3 >ill o- Ri/6ts.
:he Reagan a9ministrationSs attac' on unenumer; ate9 rights that has e>ol>e9 re>eals the lac' o6 legitimac) %olitical actors &ill likely assi/n to %ro/ressi9e constitutional inter%retation.!! <n unenumerate9 right to /ri>ac) 9oes not %er se threaten 9istinctions bet0een /ublic an9 /ri>ate 9omains o6 li6e . Rat6erC in Co%elonNs
un3er5 stan3in/ o- t6emC :u3icial 3ecisions a8out %ri9acy o- a li8eral castC %resent Ka 6i/6ly truncate3C socially re/ressi9e conce%t oautonomy.K!' 4ranslitera5 tion o- t6is ne/ati9e into %ositi9eC ra3ical conce%t 6as 8ecome a tar/et on t6e contem%orary ri/6t5&in/ a/en3a. 46is transliteration is t6reatenin/ to t6ose &6o 3eclaim Kori/inalismK an3 3enounce seDual sel-53etermination 8ecause it carries &it6 it an i3ea t6at society 6as an a--irmati9e res%onsi8ility to in3i9i3uals. 46is is not a %atriarc6al un3erstan3in/ nor an ori/inal com%onent o- t6e .S. Constitution.
&in' ( State
:he 9elineation o6 rights b) the rule o6 la0 9enies 0omen-s 0orth an9 lea9s to brutalization Sla>in $0 (Sara6C ,oli Sci S >u--alo State Colle/eC "inter 1990C Aournal o- "omen#s .istory 1(3)C %. 123)I0
Ro8in "estNs i3ea is t6at Rule o- &a0
9oes not ac'no0le9ge the 0orth o6 0omenSs connecte9ness to other human beings or real /otential -or tan/i8le connection. >y connecte3nessC "est means &omenNs eDistential eD%eriences. S6e
relies u%on em%irically 8ase3 -in3in/s a8out t6e 3e9elo%5 ment o- sel- an3 morality in &omenC 8y -eminist sc6olars suc6 as Carol 2illi/an an3 Nancy C6o3oro&C to c6aracteriBe structurally Kt6e 3i9i3e 8et&een ra3ical an3 cultural -eminism.K13 .er %oint also is t6at brutalization ma) be the result o6 6ailure 8y Rule o6 &a0 to recognize 0omenSs humanit). "est -in3s Rule oLa& Kco6erentK in its ackno&le3/ement o- t6e t6reat to men o- t6eir %6ysical eDistenceC an3 its %rotection o- t6e 9alue attac6e3 to autonomy 8y li8erals.1! 46e %6rase Krule o- la0J re6ers to classical organization o6 rights as im%artially an3 con9entionally sti/ulate9 in the /ositi>ist tra9ition.1S Rule o- &a0 is base9 in an i9ea that J0e are each /h)sicall) Sboun9arie9.N K1( :hisD "est in3icatesC is a masculinist a//roach that 9enies 0omenSs essential or materially %otential connecte9ness. In 6er critiIueC "est connects &it6 t6e -reIuent ar/ument o- contem%orary &omen %oets in t6e .S.C t6at t6e i3ea o- an in6leEibl) con6ine9 sel6 is 6ictionD1) an3 t6e %ost5structuralist ar/ument t6at t6e classi-icationC &omanC is -iction. &a0 is re/lete 0ith J6iction.K 7ccor3in/ to Roman la&C -ictio is an assum%tion or su%%osition o- t6e la&. >lackNs La& 1ictionary 3e-ines a -iction o- la& as somet6in/ &6ic6 is or may 8e -alse 8ut is assume3 or su%%ose3 trueC sayin/ -ictio le/is neminem lae3ilJ i.e. -iction o- la& in:ures no one. 7 le/al -iction may assume or su%%ose t6e eDistence o- a state o- -acts t6at 3oes not really eDist. It is a rule o6 la0 that assumes as trueD an9 0ill not allo0 to be 9is/ro>e9D something that is 6alse but not /ercei>e9 as im/ossible. >lackNs 1ictionary claims t6at t6ese assum%tions are o- an innocent or e9en 8ene-icial c6aracter an3 t6at t6ey are ma3e -or t6e a39ancement o- :ustice.
&in' ( Justice
:he a66-s >ie0 o6 ?ustice is 9ominate9 b) male /o0er an9 /re>ents an) semblance o6 eHualit) Sla>in $0 (Sara6C ,oli Sci S >u--alo State Colle/eC "inter 1990C Aournal o- "omen#s .istory 1(3)C %. 12+)I0
0ac<innon states t6at muc6 o- 0omenSs eE/erience in the 0orl9 is treate9 as lac'ing e66icac) or moti>e /o0er an3 t6at -eminismNs 3esi/n is to make 9ali3 &omenNs Kstru//le -or &orl3.K3+ nmo3i-ie3 8y marDism or li8eralismC ra3ical -eminists un3erstan3 t6atC %resentlyC the measure o6 truth is the interestD b) men 0ith /o0erD in a uni9ersal 8ut 6istorically s/eci6ic /erce/tion o6 realit). In t6is re/ar3C %ri9ate an3 %u8lic 3omains are inse%ara8le. Stru//le 8y &omen -or a&areness &ill make a%%arent t6e 3ynamic t6at constructs &omen an3 men on &6olly relational /roun3sJ it &ill -ee3 &omenNs %o&er an3 analyBe our /rie9ances in a &orl3 &e claim an3 also re:ect. Comin/ to kno& t6e %olitics an3 la& o- t6e 6istorical con3itions to &6ic6 &omen are su8:ect is comin/ to kno& our o&n li9es. In raisin/ our -eminist consciousnessC -eministsN re?ection o6 the
ob?ecti6ication o6 9esire turns on a com/rehension o6 social li6e at once critical an9 sel6;encom/assing .
7lt6ou/6 some &omen may not re:ect eit6er t6e o8:ec5 ti9e or su8:ecti9e con3itions o- t6eir li9esC t6ey 3o not contra3ict -eminismNs 3esi/n &6ere t6eir ran/e o- c6oices is constraine3 an3 t6eir -ree3om to c6oose is limite3. Instea3C accor3in/ to 0ac<innonC Kt6e man/&oman 3i--erence an3 t6e 3ominance/su8mission 3ynamic 3e-ine eac6 ot6er. 46is is t6e social meanin/ o- seD an3 t6e 3istincti9ely -eminist account o- /en3er eIuality.K39 Contem%orary marDists 6a9e seen society as 3etermine3 8y class &it6 state %o&er accruin/ in a state5s%eci-ic -orm. 7s 0ac<innon commentsC in t6is rea3in/ t6e matter o- a/ency /oes 8e//in/. Li8eralism is no more concrete in its notion o- sel-5containe3 or sel-5su--icient in3i9i3uals in t6e a8stract &it6 a8struse claims en-orcea8le 8y a%%lication ot6e reasona8le man stan3ar3. 46inkers on t6e le-t may recommen3 a8an3onin/ t6e state 8ecause it is a tool o- o%%ressionC &6ere li8erals &ill see it as im%artial an3 ca%a8le o- 3eci3in/ con-licts t6at un3erlie interest 3omains. &a0 6unctions 6or marEists as
an i9eolog) o6 legitimizationD 6or liberals as /rinci/le9 stra; teg)I neither 6unction 0ill change 0omenSs sub?ection to institutions o- ra%eC 8atteryC an3 /eneral seDual 6arassment in 0hich state an9 la0 /artici/ate.
It is /oin/ to take an on/oin/ re9olution o- %oliticsC an3 relations6i%s -oun3e3 in &ork!0 rat6er t6an /en3erC to %ro3uce an eIualiBation o- &omenNs status 9is jk 9is men un3er t6e la&. ;or 0ac<innonC t6is eEertion o6 /o0er cannot be ma9e in com/an) 0ith liberals an9 marEists. Rat6erC -eminists nee3 to s6o& t6e comin/ to/et6er o- critical consciousness in an analysis o%ri9atiBation. In t6e %ri9ate s%6ereC men 3emonstrate most com%ellin/ly &6at t6ey 6a9e t6at &omen 3o not. "omen &ill come to kno& &6at &e &ill kno&C it seems to me 0ac<innon is sayin/C &6en &e are least neutral an3 most in touc6 &it6 our o&n eD%eriences o- t6e &orl3. ;or 0ac<innonC 6eminists stan9 the greatest chance o6 com/rehen9ing that male /o0er eEists C un:usti-ia8lyC an9 that eHualit) bet0een 0omen an9 men has ne>er eEiste9 an9 0ill not come into eEistence until the construction o6 the masculine is seen 6or 0hat it isC Kits :u3/ments . . . re9eale3 in %rocess an3 %roce3ureC as &ell as a3:u3ication an3 le/islation. . . . Justice 0ill reHuire ... a ne0 ?uris/ru9ence C a ne& relation 8et&een li-e an3 la&.K!1
Feminist ?uris/ru9ence recognizes that notions o6 Ghuman rightsF marginalize man) /o/ulations ( the alternati>e sol>es all o//ression Ainion $1 (2ayleC ,ro-essor o- ,olitical Science at t6e ni9ersity o- Cali-orniaC E.uman Ri/6ts= 7 ;eminist
,ers%ecti9eFC 0use) ,A Feminist ?uris/ru9ence /ro>i9es 9ery su8stantial c6allen/es to 6uman ri/6ts la& as it is institutionally un3erstoo3. 46ese inclu3e 8ot6 6un9amental Huestions about the /rocesses b) 0hich human rights are 9e6ine9D a9?u9icate9D an9 en6orce9D as 0ell as Huestions about t6e su8stance o- 0hat is t6ere8y J/rotecte9.K 7n3C &6ile t6e -ocus o- analysis is on &omenNs eD%erienceD a 6eminist a//roach might ha>e imme9iate im/lications 6or the rights o6 all 9isem/o0ere9 /eo/les an9 raise Huestions about social organization generall). I- it &ere necessary to o--er one &or3 to ca%ture t6e essence o- -eminist :uris%ru3enceC in /eneral an3 in its si/ni-icance -or 6uman ri/6ts analysisC it is inclusion. 46e enter%rise critiIues t6e eD%erience o- 0omen as /ersons eEclu9e9 6rom legal /rotection an9 6rom /ro/ortionate /olitical an9 economic /o0er. Feminist critics o- le/al institutions Huestion 0hether t6ese institutions are ca/able o6 /rotecting 0omen. Le/al institutions are 9ie&e3 as 6ierarc6icalC a39ersarialC eDclusionaryC an3
unlikely to res%ect claims ma3e 8y &omen. 1) In a%%arently stark contrastC eD%onents o- t6e %rotection o- 6uman ri/6ts ar/ue t6at 6uman ri/6ts must 8e seen as a legal %6enomenon. I- %rinci%les o- :ustice are not legali1edC t6en t6ey are su8:ect to t6e unilateral control o- nation statesC an3 t6eir a8use can 8e su8:ecte3 to not6in/ more t6an t6e ad !oc eD%ression o- moral outra/e 8y t6ose &6o 3isa/ree &it6 t6e c6allen/e3 8e6a9ior. "6ile t6e 3omestic or international co3i-ication o- %olicyC like con9entional or common la&C %ro9i3es no /uarantee t6at t6e la& &ill 8e res%ecte3C 6uman ri/6ts a39ocates maintain ne9ert6eless t6at Kla&K is a critically im%ortant arro& in t6eir Iui9er. $9en in situations in &6ic6 liti/ation is eit6er im%ossi8le or im%racticalC t6is 9ie& rests on t6e assum%tion t6at most states 3o not e9en &ant to appear to 8e in 9iolation o- G$n3 ,a/e '13H international la&. 1+ 1es%ite t6e &i3ely 6el3 9ie& t6at all international la& is sim%ly international %oliticsC 8ein/ a8le to %ortray a claim as 6a9in/ t6e 8ackin/ o- Kla&K remo9es t6e 3ialo/ue -rom t6e realm o- 8ein/ not6in/ more t6an sel-5intereste3 ne/otiation. 7 -eminist analysisC in contrastC mi/6t &ell ar/ue -rom eD%erience t6at human rights la0 has been a miserable 6ailure in /rotecting /eo/les 6rom o//ression.
1es%ite t6is imme3iately a%%arent con-lict o9er &6et6er la& is im%ortant in t6e %rotection o- 6uman ri/6tsC in a senseC the 6eminist concern an9 the classic human rights /ers/ecti>e ma) not be in 6un9amental 9isagreement o>er the Huestion o6 reliance on la0. 46is is 8ecause t6e ma:or concern eD%resse3 8y -eminist
critics o- le/al institutionsC %reeminently 8y Carole SmartC is t6at litigation as a process 3oes not ser9e &omen. 19 .uman ri/6ts a39ocates also kno& only too &ell t6at liti/ation is an eDtremely limite3 tool in t6is en3ea9or. 20 46usC &6ile &omenNs eD%erience &oul3 su//est t6at reliance on courtsC :u3/esC an3 la&yers to trans-orm society is -ollyC -eminists an3 tra3itional 6uman ri/6ts acti9ists are 8ot6 a8le to a%%reciateC an3 %er6a%s a/reeC t6at 3e9elo%in/ law as principle and rule is not an enter%rise to 8e :ettisone3. 46e %oints o- 3isa/reement t6at are -ar more -un3amental re-lect on t6e %olitical %o&er t6at is re%resente3 in t6e %rocess o- 3e-inin/ t6ese Kle/alK ri/6tsC t6e limitations on Kri/6tsK analysisC an3 t6e li-e eD%erience t6at s6oul3 un3erlie t6e su8stanti9e %rinci%les o- 6uman ri/6ts la& to &6ic6 t6e &orl3 ou/6t to 8e committe3 .
,here human rights a9>ocates s/ar 0ith the go>ernmental /o0ers;that;be largel) o>er ho0 the) are treating /olitical 9issi9entsD 6eminist critics maintain that the 9iameter o6 the circle o6 inclusion in the realm o6 human rights la0 is entirel) too narro0.
&in' ( &a0
:he la0 0ill en9lessl) subor9inate 0omen b) classi6)ing G/ro/erF beha>ior Sla>in $0 (Sara6C ,oli Sci S >u--alo State Colle/eC "inter 1990C Aournal o- "omen#s .istory 1(3)C %. 12!)I0
*ne conseIuence o- la& in t6e .S. is 3iscrimination a/ainst /rou%s o- %eo%le in t6e 3istri8ution o- 8ene-its an3 8ur3ens. &a0 must en9lessl) 9iscriminateD or classi6)D in /ro>i9ing the stan9ar9s b) 0hich /eo/le &it6 a la&5an35or3er maintainin/ %ers%ecti9e ma) /re9ict t6eir beha>ior. 0ost %eo%le 6a9e a la&5an35or3er maintainin/ %ers%ecti9e. 46ey are eD%ecte3 to 8ecause this stabilizes the regime.2 ,omen are one social /rou% subor9inate9 b) this en9less 9iscrimination an9 allocation o6 >alue9 things. In t6e &or3s o- 2aya tri C6akra9orty S%i9akC a 3enial 8y la& o- &omen to t6emsel9es eD%un/es Kt6e clitoris as t6e si/ni-ier o- t6e seDe3 su8:ect.K3 4o se%arate outC consistentlyC seDuality an3 re%ro3uction in 3e-inin/ &omenNs le/al status &oul3 intro3uce to seD5 an3 /en3er58ase3 classi-ications a res%onsi9eness not currently %resent. &egal re6orms ten3 instea3 to ?usti6) 9is/ossessionC maintainin/ to t6e eDtent %ossi8le su%eror3inate male59alue5linke3 le/al %racticesC inclu3in/ em%6asis on &omenNs re%ro3ucti9e -unction an3 3e5em%6asis o- seDuality as social construct. Re6orms 6ail to re/resent 0omenSs >oices orC as .elene CiDous 6as &rittenC Kson/ 8e-ore la&.K! In t6is conteDtC it seems 6utile to eD%ect to reco>er re/resentations o6 9amage sustaine9 b) 0omenC in our many cultural communitiesC an3 o- &6atC as a matter o- 6istoryC &e 6a9e lost.' In t6is re/ar3C la0 as an embo9iment o6 collecti>e 9ecisionC as means to sur>i>al an3 sel-5 3estructionC seems insu66icient 6or our nee9s.
Im/act ( 4//ression/4therization
Patriarch) is a sel6;6ul6illing /ro/hec) ( the more uneHuall) 0omen are treate9D the more the) are sub?ugate9 Fellmeth 2' (7aronC Int. Rel. S OaleC .uman Ri/6ts Uuarterly 22(3)C %. ('+5)33)I0
,rior to t6e recent -eminist -ocus on international la&C -eminists a%%roac6e3 3omestic le/al systems &it6 t6e 8asic assum%tion t6at the
un9erl)ing /ur/ose o6 6eminist acti>ism shoul9 be eHual treatment o6 men an9 0omen un9er la0 an9 in the la0. 46e seminal court case &as Ree3 9. Ree3C ) in &6ic6 t6e S Su%reme Court annulle3 a state la& /rantin/ males
automatic %re-erence o9er -emales in t6e a%%ointment o- estate a3ministrators. 7-ter t6eir 9ictory in Ree3C -eminists 8e/an to c6allen/e a &i3e 9ariety o- la&s t6at e9ince3 3irect an3 in3irect 3iscrimination a/ainst &omen. :heir metho9 anal)ze9 ho0 substanti>e legal theories a//lie9 to 6act scenarios to 9isa9>antage 0omen . ;rances *lsenC -or eDam%leC a39ocate3 9ery %ra/matically t6at -eminists s6oul3 c6allen/e t6ose la&s t6at currently 6a9e t6e most %ernicious e--ects on &omen. + 7t t6e core o- t6is mo3e o- -eminist critiIue is an attack on s%eci-ic le/al -ictions 3ra&in/ a 8oun3ary 8et&een men an3 &omen. &egal rules
/re9icate9 on male/6emale 9i66erences are 6oun9e9 u/on sel6;6ul6illing /ro/hecies. ,hen the la0 treats men an9 0omen uneHuall)D the) become uneHual b) that >er) 6act. 0ore recentlyC certain ra3ical 6eminists ha>e come to attac' the /atriarchal state an9 its legal a//aratus altogether as /ro9ucts an9 /er/etuaters o6 male o//ression. 9 46is &as in some cases a %er6a%s ni6ilistic res%onse to t6e -rustratin/ im%ossi8ility o- true
neutral le/ality in t6e -ace o- certain 8iolo/ical 3i--erences 8et&een men an3 &omenC suc6 as %re/nancy an3 t6e 3is%arity in /eneral %6ysical siBe an3 stren/t6. ;or eDam%leC in 19)!C -eminists c6allen/e3 t6e -act t6at Cali-ornia 3isa8ility la& co9ere3 9irtually e9ery me3ical con3itionC inclu3in/ se9eral 9oluntary me3ical %roce3uresC 8ut 3i3 not co9er %re/nancy. 10 46e Su%reme Court u%6el3 t6e la& as non3iscriminatoryC 6o&e9erC 8ecauseC on its -aceC it 3i3 not 3iscriminate a/ainst &omen. 11 7ccor3in/ to t6e CourtNs reasonin/C t6e la& eDclu3e3 t6e con3ition o- %re/nancyJ 8ot6 men an3 &omen can 8e non5%re/nantJ er/oC t6e la& 3oes not 3iscriminate 8et&een men an3 &omen. 46e -act t6at only &omen 3o in -act 8ecome %re/nant a%%arently 3i3 not in-luence t6e Court. 46is reasonin/ o%ene3 t6e a8sur3 %ossi8ility o- lu%us or 8reast cancer 8ein/ eDclu3e3 &it6out raisin/ an issue o- 3iscriminationC as 8ot6 men an3 &omen can 8e -ree -rom lu%us an3 8reast cancer. I- one i/nores t6e e--ects o- t6e la& an3 assumes t6at men an3 &omen are eIual in e9ery &ayC t6e Court &as un3ou8te3ly correct. .o&e9erC eIuality 3oes not mean Ki3enticality.K 46ere is an un8reaka8le link 8et&een /en3er an3 suc6 con3itions as %re/nancy an3 lu%us. 12 In res%onse to t6ese set8acksC some -eminists 3etermine3 t6at t6e eIuality t6at &omen 6a3 ac6ie9e3 in some countries resulte3 in an eIuality on menNs terms. "omen 8ein/ treate3 as eIual to men too o-ten meant &omen con-ormin/ to menNs stan3ar3s o- co/nition an3 8e6a9iorC 6ealt6 an3 illnessC ac6ie9ement an3 -ailure. 4o t6e eDtent t6at 3i--erence &as reco/niBe3C %ercei9e3 -emale traitsC suc6 as %uttin/ -amily 8e-ore &orkC 6umanity 8e-ore %o&erC ecolo/y 8e-ore %ro-itC or coo%eration 8e-ore :usticeC &ere consi3ere3 &eaknesses in &omen rat6er t6an le/itimate 3i--erences in %ers%ecti9e. Feminists realize9 that
JeHualit)J meant that 0omen 9o not bene6it 0hen their nee9s are less than menSsD but that the) su66er 0hen their nee9s are greater. 0ost -eminists no& reco/niBe t6at &omen 6a9e at least some 3i--erent G$n3 ,a/e ((3H nee3s
t6an men an3 t6at eIuality o- treatment 3oes not necessarily mean eIuality in t6e ty%es or amounts o- resources t6at a society allocates to %ro/rams an3 causes t6at 8ene-it one /en3er more t6an t6e ot6er. 13 It is not :ust 8iolo/ical 3i--erences t6at man3ate 3i--erent treatment. ,ell;'no0n 6acts o6 social ineHualit)55suc6 as t6e 6i/6er inci3ence o- -emale %o9ertyC t6e &a/e 3i--erentialC t6e cor%orate K/lass ceilin/CK t6e ten3ency -or 6us8an3s to 8eat t6eir &i9es more o-ten an3 more se9erely t6an &i9es 8eat t6eir 6us8an3s55
all mean that eHual la0s in the boo's 9o not necessaril) lea9 to eHual results. For eEam/leD la0s that man9ate a minimum 0age ma) raise general 0age le>elsD but the) 9o not 6ull) re9ress the 6act that 0omen are generall) /ai9 less 6or eHual 0or'.
Patriarch) results in unchec'e9 hegemon) that see's to 9ominate an9 cause >iolence !lar' + (0ary $C ,ro-essor o- >iolo/y at ni9ersity o- Cali-orniaC
6tt%=//mail.k&u.e3u=2092/citation.as...C3;'X-n?1Xrn?1) ,A :o9a)Ss "estern /atriarchal 0orl9 >ie0 no& 9ominates /lo8al&i3e 9ialogue among the Jlea9ersJ o6 .arthSs nearly t&o 6un3re3 nation5states. Its 0ac6ia9ellian/Real%olitik assum/tions about the necessit) o6 militar) /o0er to /reser>e or9er &it6in an3 8et&een /rou%s o- 6umans trum%s 5 an3 sti6les ; other %otential >ie0/oints. ;oun3e3 on t6e 8elie- t6at Ke9ilK is innateD it 9ictates that human con6lict must be Jcontrolle9J@ global Jla0J bac'e9 b) coerci>e 6orce . :his >ie0C &6en cross5culturally im%ose3C becomes a sel66ul6illing /ro/hec)D thus JlegitimatingJ an escalating use o6 6orce . ,estern lea9ers (male an3 -emale) use a rhetoric couche9 in a Jhegemonic masculinit)J to ?usti6) their rea9) use o6 militar) 6orce to coerce Jthose 0ho are against usJ into com/liance.
because the) are a co>er;u/ 6or the maintenance o6 male 9ominance in the s/heres that are subseHuentl) 'e/t outsi9e human rights scrutin). 2' 46e creation o- ne& K&omenNs 6uman ri/6tsK an3 t6e
rec6aracteriBation o- eDistin/ ri/6ts are t&o means a39ocate3 to i3enti-y instances o- &omenNs su8or3ination an3 o- 9iolence a/ainst &omen as 6uman ri/6ts 9iolations. 2(
grou/s. I6 the >ie0/oint o6 the grou/ is ta'enD there is a ris' o6 essentialismD because it becomes 9i66icult to ta'e internal 9i66erences G$n3 ,a/e 1(2H an3 e9olutions insi3e t6e /rou% into account. 2rou% ri/6ts are not t6e only &ay to eD%ress t6e Kconnecte3nessK or Kem8e33e3nessK o- 6uman 8ein/s in terms o- 6uman ri/6ts. In9i>i9ual rights can ha>e an im/ortant communal as/ect. 46is is clear -or -amily ri/6tsC reli/ious ri/6tsC an3 associational ri/6ts. >ut alsoC i- a
certain &ay o- s%eakin/ is c6aracteristic -or a %articular community a communal 3imension may 8e inte/rate3 into t6e -ree3om os%eec6. 7n3 some cultural or communal as%ects o- someoneNs &ay o- li-e may 8e 8rou/6t un3er t6e ri/6t to %ri9acy. 13! 0any ot6er eDam%les coul3 8e /i9enC 8ut t6e main %oint is t6at intro9ucing s/eci6icit) in an in9i>i9ual rights a//roach ma'es
it
/ossible to >alue a concrete /ersonSs communal tiesD not those that the 9ominant 6orces insi9e the communit) 0oul9 li'e to attribute to him or her. .ach in9i>i9ual shoul9 ha>e the right to /ractice his or her culture an9 tra9itionsD but li'e0iseD each in9i>i9ual shoul9 ha>e the right to re?ect them C -or
instance 8ecause 6e or s6e 6as 8een in-luence3 8y contact &it6 anot6er culture or &it6 international -eminism. 46ese in-luences are as muc6 a %art o- reality as tra3itional culture is. 46e international 6uman ri/6ts system s6oul3 3e-en3 t6is Ko%t5outK %ossi8ility 13' an3 take u% res%onsi8ility -or t6e &omen &6o use it. 13(
<2@ Perm
:he a66-s attem/t at critical la0 is still masculinist ( com/lete reconce/tualization is nee9e9 Sla>in $0 (Sara6C ,oli Sci S >u--alo State Colle/eC "inter 1990C Aournal o- "omen#s .istory 1(3)C %. 12!)I0
7ccor3in/ to "estC Rule o- &a0 is masculinist regar9less o6 0hether a//roache9 through legal liberalism or critical legal theor). ;eminist t6eory can 6a9e not6in/ in common &it6 eit6er le/al t6eory 8ecause 6eminist theor) is out to 9escribe the Jsub?ecti>it) o6 human eEistence.K1N 46is 3escri%tion or re%resentation inclu3es &6at it is like to 8e %ossesse3 8y anot6eriMone -unction o- %atriarc6y. 46e a%%lication o- -eminist t6eory to Rule o- La& &orks to tell &omenNs stories20 a8out &6at &oul3 8e t6e si/ni-icance o- lo9e to Ka &ell le3 %u8lic li-e.K21 Feminist theor)Ss a//lication re>eals 0omenSs construction b) Rule o6 &a0 as /ersons un0orth) o6 >alorization . Feminist theor) 0or's to 9econstruct this authoritati>e imager). In "estNs 9ie&C a KAuris%ru3ence nmo3i-ie3K 8y le/al li8eralism or critical le/al t6eory &ill 8e a reconstructi9e -eminist :uris%ru3ence. It &ill /i9e 9oice to t6e su8:ecti9ity o- &omenNs eD%erience an3 &omenNs %oint o9ie& a8out our li9es. Le/al re-orms t6at -eminists may alrea3y 6a9e ac6ie9e3 &ill 8e instrumental to t6is 9oicin/ o- eD%eriences an3 9ie&%oints. .o&e9erC t6ese re6orms 0ill nee9 to be reconce/tualize9 becauseD in t6eir ori/inal -ormC the)
analogize9 harms 9one to 0omen an9 0omenSs nee9s to harms 9one to men an9 to menSs nee9s .
Incor/orating 6eminist >ie0s into a masculine logic co;o/ts our mo>ement Scales $% (7nn CC ,ro-essor o- La& at t6e ni9ersity o- 0eDicoC E;eminist Auris%ru3enceFC %. 9+599)
0ale an3 -emale %erce%tions o- 9alue are not s6are3 an3C are %er6a%s not e9en %erce%ti8le to eac6 ot6er. 2) In our current /en3eriBe3 realmC t6ere-oreC t6e Kri/6ts58ase3K an3 Kcare58ase3K et6ics cannot 8e 8len3e3. ,atriarc6al %syc6olo/y sees 9alue as 3i--erently 3istri8ute3 8et&een men an3 &omen= 0en are rationalJ &omen are not. ;eminist %syc6olo/y su//ests 3i--erent conce%tions o- 9alue= "omen are entirely rationalC 8ut society cannot accommo3ate t6em 8ecause t6e male stan3ar3 6as 3e-ine3 into o8li9ion any 9ersion orationality 8ut its o&n. 2+ ,ara3i/matic male 9alues like o8:ecti9ityC are 3e-ine3 as eDclusi9eC i3enti-ie3 8y t6eir %resume3 o%%osites. 46ose 9aluesC cannot 8e content &it6 multi%licityJ t6ey create t6e ot6er an3 t6en 3e9our it. *8:ecti9ity i/nores conteDtJ reason is t6e o%%osite o- emotionJ ri/6ts %reclu3e care. 7s lon/ as t6e rulin/ i3eolo/y is a -unction o- t6is 3ic6otomiBationC incor/orationism threatens to be mere coo/tationD a more subtle >ersion o6 6emale in>isibilit). A) tr)ing to ma'e e>er)thing too niceD incor/orationism re/resses contra9ictions. It usur/s 0omenSs language in or9er to 6urther 9e6ine the 0orl9 in the male imageI it thus 9e/ri>es 0omen o6 the /o0er o6 naming. 2$ Incor/orationism means to gi>e o>er the 0orl9D because it means to sa) to those in /o0er@ J,e 0ill use )our language an9 0e 0ill let )ou inter/ret it.J
:he /ermutation incor/orates the masculine logic ( assuring seEism rearticulates itsel6 Scales $% (7nn CC ,ro-essor o- La& at t6e ni9ersity o- 0eDicoC E;eminist Auris%ru3enceFC %. 9+)
Incor/orationism %resumes t6at &e can &6i% t6e %ro8lem o- social ineIuality 8y a33in/ yet anot6er %ron/ to t6e alrea3y multi%ron/e3 le/al tests my stu3ents -eel t6ey must memoriBe. Incor%orationism su--ers -rom t6e same lack o- 9ision as t6e KeIual ri/6ts/ s%ecial ri/6tsK 3e8ate. >ot6 /resumeD that male su/remac) is sim/l) a ran9om collection o6 irrationalities in an other0ise rational coeEistence . >ot6 %resume t6at instances o- ineIuality are mere le/al mistakes55a series o- -ailures to treat eIuals as eIuals &6ic6 &e can -iD i- &e can :ust s%ot t6e irrationality in enou/6 cases. 7s ,ro-essor 0ac<innon 6as 3emonstrate3C 6o&e9erC -rom suc6 9ie&%oints &e cannot see t6at male su%remacy is a com%lete social system -or t6e a39anta/e oone seD o9er anot6er. 2! :he in?ustice o6 seEism is not irrationalit)I it is 9omination. &a0 must 6ocus on the latterD an9 that 6ocus cannot be achie>e9 through a 6ormal lens. Ain9ing oursel>es to rules 0oul9 hel/ us onl) i6 seEism 0ere a legal error.
9emonstrates that there is no essence o6 ,oman that can be e66ecti>el) abstracte9 6rom the linguistic re/resen; tations o6 ,oman. :he re6erent ,oman is 9e/en9ent u/on the s)stems o6 re/resentation in 0hich she is gi>en meaning.10 46us the ,oman an9 6or that matter the 8an o6 legal 9iscourse are 9iscursi>e constructsC only t&o o- many contri8utions -rom 9arious -iel3s o- kno&le3/e t6at /en3er society. Since this 9iscursi>e /ro?ect /ermeates all /ro9uction o6 'no0le9geD 0e are not able to ste/ outsi9e language to ascertain the true nature o6 either the 6eminine or the masculine. 7t its most restricti9eC t6e -ocus on
3econstruction can lea3 a&ay -rom /i9in/ any attention at all to &omen#s li9e3 eD%erience t6e 3an/er 6ere is t6at -eminists &ill %osit la& as a E/en3erin/ %racticeF an3 concentrate only on un9eilin/ its E/en3ere3 narrati9esF &it6out any re-erence to &omen#s li9e3 eD%eriencesC an3 t6ere-ore &it6out any sense o- %ros%ects -or c6an/e in t6e system.11 In -airness to CornellC t6is is not 6er %osition. *n t6e contraryC s6e t6inks t6at the /ro?ect o6 9econstructing le/al (or ot6er) 9iscourse can be 9one using
imagination an9 meta/hor to /ro9uce alternate >isionsD 6emi; nine 0a)s o6 seeing a 0orl9 in 0hich gen9er /la)s out >er) 9i66erentl) s6e 8elie9es in t6e %o&er o- uto%ian t6inkin/. In this more acti>ist 9econstruc; ti>e mo9eD an eE/loration o6 the 0a)s in 0hich la0 an9 legal institutions construct gen9er ta'es its /lace as /art o6 the larger /ro?ect o6 eEamining gen9ering /ractices in t6e societ) as a &6ole &it6 an eye to
c6an/e. 46e la& is :ust one small site o- %ossi8le contest o9er /en3ere3 %o&er relationsC o- courseC an3 /en3er5neutral la&C or rat6er la& t6at realiBes t6e -ull %otential o- 8ot6 t6e masculine an3 t6e -eminineC coul3 only emer/e in t6e conteDt o- a trans-ormation o- t6e entire society.
==<66 <ns0ers==
state is not the onl) /o0er6ul actor that 0ants to limit the reach o6 human rights to onl) the J/ublicJ 9omain. :he /ressure to 9o so might come as 0ell 6rom the J/ri>ateJ realm. Religious institutions an9 cor/orationsD 6or eEam/leC 6a9e muc6 to /ain in t6e %reser9ation o- t6eir autonomy -rom t6e illusion o- in9isi8ility t6at t6e t&o5s%6eres t6eory %ro9i3es. I6 human rights concerns are 6ocuse9 solel) on the state
8ecause o- a t6eory o- t6e insulation o- t6e -amily as K%ri9ateCK t6e -alse illusion o- a G$n3 ,a/e '1)H 3ual5institution society is rein-orce3. .Ece/tionall) /o0er6ul bo9ies be)on9 the 6amilial /atriarch) thereb) esca/e scrutin) . $m%loyers (o- &omen an3 men) &6o %ay unconsciona8ly lo& &a/es -or &ork un3er in6umane con3itions &oul3 8e unlikely to &ant international 6uman ri/6ts la& 8rou/6t to 8ear a/ainst t6em. Reli/ious or3ers &it6 /en3erC raceC or caste 3isIuali-ication %olicies &oul3 similarly not &elcome suc6 attention. n3er t6e t&o5s%6eres t6eory o- society t6ese institutions 3o not eDistC an3 t6eir %ractices are e--ecti9ely s6iel3e3 -rom international 6uman ri/6ts re9ie&. "ere &omenNs eD%erience t6e -ocus o- 6uman ri/6ts la&C attention to t6e non/o9ernmental s%6ere &oul3 8e 6ei/6tene3C an3 %atterns o- social or/aniBation an3 %ractices t6at are eD%loitati9eC not :ust o- &omen an3 not :ust 8y -amilial %atriarc6sC 8ut also 8y ot6er %o&er-ul 8o3iesC &oul3 8e 8rou/6t into 8ol3 relie-. 29 46e 3enial o- t6e eDistence o- a K%ri9ateK realm o- 6uman ri/6ts 9iolations is not limite3 to t6ose &it6 an a%%arent 9este3 interest in t6e status Iuo. .uman ri/6ts t6eoristsC suc6 as 7lstonC not uncommonly -ear t6e 3ilution o- 6uman ri/6ts %rinci%les i- t6e realms are eD%an3e3 8eyon3 t6e tra3itional. 30 <cti>ist 6rien9s o6 human rightsD such as <mnest) InternationalD slo0 to >ie0 0omen as >ictims o6
9enials o6 human rightsD ha>e hel9 6irm in their >ie0 that go>ernment must be seen as the /er/etrator o6 the >iolations in or9er 6or their organization to act. 31 ,rominent -eminist t6eorists o-ten 6a9e ar/ue3 -or only a 9ery circumscri8e3 realm o- %ri9ate 6uman ri/6ts a8uses. 32 :he stan9ar9 <nglo;<merican Aill o6 Rights >ie0 o6 go>ernment as the uniHuel) /o0er6ul /otential e>il;9oer is as en9emic in the tra9itional human rights nongo>ernmental " G4# communit) as it is among go>ernments themsel>es . G$n3 ,a/e '1+H
Perm sol>es ( the /o0er o6 the state nee9s to 0or' in con?unction 0ith /o0er hierarchiesD to be un9erstoo9 in the /ro/er conteEt Sch0artzman $$ (LisaC ,6iloso%6y S o- NO Stony >rookC .y%atia 1!(2)C %. 33)I0
In res%onse to t6isC a li8eral mi/6t ar/ue t6at 8ecause there
are la0sM8ot6 criminal an3 ci9ilM/re>enting harms /er/etrate9 b) either the go>ernment or b) in9i>i9ualsC %rotection alrea3y eDists a/ainst t6e systemic 6arms oracismC G$n3 ,a/e 33H seDismC classismC etc. "6et6er an in3i9i3ualC /rou%C or /o9ernment commits t6ese sorts o- 6armsC la&s alrea3y eDist to a33ress t6em. ;ocusin/ on ci9il la&C an3 on constitutional la& in %articularC 0ac<innon 3oes not 3eny t6at t6e la& %ro9i3es a -ormal /uarantee to res%ect an3 %rotect t6e ri/6ts o- in3i9i3uals to 8e treate3 KeIually.K Nonet6elessC the 0a) that liberal theorists inter/ret an9 em/lo) these rights o6ten ren9ers them ine66ecti>e in 8rin/in/ :ustice to %eo%le &6ose o%%ression is constitute3 t6rou/6 t6e o%eration o- racialC seDualC an3 economic %o&er structures. "it6out a33ressin/ an3 alterin/ t6ese %o&er structuresC 0ac<innon ar/uesC t6e -ormal /rantin/ o- t6e ri/6ts to -ree s%eec6C %ri9acyC -ree3omC an3 eIuality are not /oin/ to succee3 in 8rin/in/ a8out :ustice an3 eIuality -or &omenC or -or ot6er mem8ers o- o%%resse3 /rou%s. 11 7lt6ou/6 recent la&s t6at reco/niBe seDual 6arassment as a %ro8lem o- seD eIuality are one eDce%tion to t6isC -or t6e most %art t6e la& 3oes not ackno&le3/e eD%licitly t6e o%%ression o- &omen an3 attem%t to reme3y it. Rat6erC the rights o6 0omen an9 members o6 other
o//resse9 grou/s are recognize9 to the eEtent that the /ersons in these /ositions resemble 0hiteD u//er;mi99le;class men. Note t6at 8acKinnon is not suggesting that these structures o6 /o0er are 0holl) in9e/en9ent o6 the state or t6at t6ey &ill not c6an/e unless structures outsi3e t6e realm o- t6e state c6an/e -irst. 8acKinnon sees the /o0er o6 the state 0or'ing in con?unction 0ith these s/eci6ic hierarchiesKin both o>ert an9 co>ert 0a)s. 46usC rat6er t6an inter%retin/ these liberal rights an9 6ree9oms as sim%ly ri/6ts a/ainst /o9ernment inter9entionC 0ac<innon ar/ues t6at t6ey must be un9erstoo9 in the conteEt o6 ineHualit) an9 o//ressionI the) must be inter/rete9 in such a 0a) that the) can begin to change these structures o6 o//ression an3 t6ere8y make it %ossi8le -or %eo%le to eDercise t6e -ormal ri/6ts t6at t6e Constitution le/ally /rants t6em.
anal)sis o6 0ho has /o0er o>er 0homD an9 it 0oul9 ha>e to concern itsel6 0ith attem/ting to reme9) these ineHualities through changing societ)Ss institutionsD /racticesD an9 structures o6 /o0erD not a re?ection o6 the institutions o6 societ)D or the /ro>ision o6 rights 6rom the go>ernment an9 Rule o6 &a0.
*sing the la0 to recognize 0omen-s rights is 'e) to sol>e Fellmeth 2' (7aronC Int. Rel. S OaleC .uman Ri/6ts Uuarterly 22(3)C %. ('+5)33)I0
7s 3iscusse3 a8o9eC the
causes o6 gen9er bias in international la0 are lin'e9 to the economic an9 /olitical 9isem/o0erment o6 0omen 0ithin statesC an3 to t6e 3ominance o- -inancial %ro-it o9er 6uman ri/6ts in t6e international a/en3a. International la0 has slo0l) im/ro>e9 in recognizing 0omenSs human rights an3 is a3o%tin/ an Ket6ic
o- careK to 8alance t6e tra3itional Ket6ic o- :usticeCK 8ut t6e commitment o- states to 6uman ri/6ts concerns 6as not %ro/resse3 a3eIuately. 0any o- t6e %oor countries o- t6e &orl3 are /ettin/ %oorerC an3C in t6e 9ast ma:ority o- t6ese less in3ustrialiBe3 countriesC t6e socialC economicC an3 %olitical situation o- &omen 6as not si/ni-icantly im%ro9e3 relati9e to men since t6e en3 o- t6e Secon3 "orl3 "ar. "6ile attention to &omenNs interests 6as increase3 /reatly in in3ustrialiBe3 states (an3 continues to im%ro9e)C ra%eC t6e 3omestic assault o- &omenC an3 %olitical an3 economic ineIuality remain se9ere %ro8lems. 31! ,ealthier states shoul9 establish a
6un9 an9 o66er technical assistance to less 0ealth) states to ensure com/liance 0ith human rights normsD /articularl) 0ith res/ect to 0omen. *n t6e 3i%lomatic le9elC the richer an9 more /o0er6ul states 6ocus more on international economic matters /rimaril) bene6iting men than on /ressuring other states55%articularly 3ictators6i%s;;to res/ect 0omenSs rights an3 ot6er 6uman ri/6ts an3 %rotect t6eir citiBens -rom /en3er5
8ase3 3iscrimination. 46e -all o- communism seems to 6a9e s6i-te3 t6is -ocus sli/6tlyC 8ut t6ere 6as 8een no momentous c6an/eC 3es%ite t6e -act t6at t6e 3emocratic states no lon/er %ercei9e a nee3 to -un3 less economically 3e9elo%e3 states55re/ar3less o- t6eir 6uman ri/6ts recor3s55to %re9ent t6em -rom -allin/ un3er t6e s&ay o- t6e So9iet nion. :he solution to gen9er bias in international la0 isC t6ere-oreC not onl) to increase the re/resentation o6 0omen in international organizationsD but to augment their /olitical an9 economic re/resentation in the states that com/ose international societ). 7s lon/ as &omen are un3erre%resente3 in Ne%alese %olitics an3 8usinessC &omenNs ri/6ts &ill 8e un3eren-orce3 in Ne%al. CertainlyC any re6orm within states will be helpful. >ut on t6e international le9elC states s6oul3 esta8lis6 institutions -ocusin/ on com%liance &it6 6uman ri/6ts norms an3 &omenNs ri/6ts %articularly. StatesN tools G$n3 ,a/e )31H -or encoura/in/ &omenNs re%resentation in ot6er states are lar/ely limite3 to 3i%lomacy an3 lea3in/ 8y eDam%leC an3 to 3ra-tin/ an3 a36erin/ to t6eir o&n treaties co3i-yin/ t6e ri/6ts o- &omen un3er international la&. .o&e9erC t6ese treaties must be bin9ing un9er international la0D
shoul9 9isallo0 9erogationsD an9 shoul9 reHuire states to ta'e concrete ste/s to0ar9 im/lementing them.
:he /ersonal is /olitical ( 6eminists shoul9 engage in /olic) ma'ing to un9ermine /atriarch) &ee 3 (46eresa 0an Lin/C aut6orC ERet6inkin/ t6e ,ersonal an3 t6e ,olitical= ;eminist 7cti9ism an3 Ci9ic
$n/a/ementF 0use) ,recisely &6at is at stake in askin/ &6et6er -eminist %olitics is con/ruent &it6 ci9ic en/a/ementV 4o ans&er t6e IuestionC I 8e/in 8y %lacin/ t6e slo/an Gthe /ersonal is the /oliticalF in its 6istorical conteDt. 7merican -eminist acti9ist <at6ie Sarac6il3 -irst use3 t6e term Gconsciousness;raisingF to mean Gthe /rocess b) 0hich 0omen in small grou/s coul9 eE/lore the /olitical as/ects o6 /ersonal li6eF (Rosen 2000C 19)). 7not6er acti9istC ,amela 7llenC 3escri8e3 6o& consciousness5raisin/ /rou%s o%erate3= E46e /rou% is t6e -irst ste% in transcen3in/ t6e isolation. .ere sometimes -or t6e -irst time in 6er li-e a &oman is allo&e3 an i3entity in3e%en3ent o- a man#s. She is allowed to function intellectually as a thinker rat6er t6an as a seD o8:ectC ser9antC &i-e or mot6er. In s6ortC the group establishes the social worth of the women presentC a necessity if women are to take themselves seriouslyF (19)0/2000C 2+0J em%6asis a33e3). In %articularC 7llen em%6asiBe3 t6e nee3 -or &omen to teac6 t6emsel9es Eto t6ink in3e%en3entlyF it6e Eo%enin/ u%F an3 Es6arin/F &ere to /et %ast t6e sta/e o- sim%ly %ro9i3in/ t6era%eutic relie- -or t6e %artici%ants (2+0+1). ltimatelyC the goal o6 consciousness;raising 0as the generation o6 theor) that 0as Groote9 in concrete eE/erienceF (2))). 46eory &as im%ortant 8ecause it -acilitate3 t6e a%%re6ension o- t6e EtotalityF o- &omen#s con3itionC &it6out &6ic6 e--ecti9e c6an/e at 8ot6 %ersonal an3 social le9els coul3 not 8e initiate3 (2+0). Cana3ian -eminist acti9ist 7nne Crocker ec6oe3 a similar un3erstan3in/ o- consciousness5 raisin/ (19)'C 3+39). 7s a -ocal %oint o- secon35&a9e acti9ismC consciousness;raising 0as the 6irst ste/ to0ar9 0omen-s emanci/ation 6rom /atriarch)D 0hich 6eminists 9eeme9 ubiHuitous. n3erlyin/ t6is strate/ic 8reakt6rou/6 &as t6e t6eoretical insi/6tC ori/inally o--ere3 8y Simone 3e >eau9oirC t6at &oman6oo3 is a social an3 cultural construct= E*ne is not 8ornC 8ut rat6er 8ecomesC a &omanF (19)!C 301). ,er6a%s more %ro-oun3 &as >eau9oir#s use o- t6e .e/elian master5sla9e 3ialectic in un3erstan3in/ t6e 3ynamics o- /en3er i3entity. 7ccor3in/ to >eau9oirC G7umanit) is male an9 man 9e6ines 0oman not in hersel6 but as relati>e to himI she is not regar9e9 as an autonomous being. . . . She is 9e6ine9 an9 9i66erentiate9 0ith re6erence to man an9 not he 0ith re6erence to herI she is the inci9entalD the inessential as o//ose9 to the essential. 7e is the Sub?ectD he is the <bsoluteKshe is the 4ther F (D9iii DiD). >eau9oir#s analysis 6el%e3 -acilitate t6e secon3 &a9e 8y %ointin/ to t6e nee3 -or t6e -eminist cause to /o 8eyon3 %rocurement o- -ormal eIuality (;rie3an 19)!C +9J >eau9oir 19)(). Rat6erC -eminism is a8out &omen#s li9in/ as -ree an3 autonomous in3i9i3uals on &omen#s terms.
o6 the same reasons the ci>il rights mo>ement in6luence9 <merican social mo>ementsD a//ear to also be the source o6 its in6luence on in; ternational mo>ements. 46e ma:or eDce%tion is t6at t6e ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement 3i3 not ser9e as t6e trainin/ /roun3 -or
many o- t6e acti9ists &6o initiate3 mo9ements outsi3e t6e nite3 States. "6at is clearC 6o&e9erC is t6at numerous international mo9ements &ere in-luence3 8y t6e S ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement. 7 similarity t6at mo9ements s6are across t6e &orl3 is t6at the) usuall) must con6ront authorities 0ho ha>e su/erior /o0er. :he ma?or challenge 6or such
mo>ements is that the) must 9e>elo/ a collecti>e action strateg) that 0ill generate le>erage enabling them to engage in /o0er struggles 0ith /o0er6ul o//onents. 46e strate/y o- non9iolent 3irect action &as -irst 3e9elo%e3 8y 2an36i in Sout6 7-rica an3 t6en use9 b) Gan9hi in the mass mo>ement that o>erthre0 Aritish colonialism in In9ia. 26an3iNs use o- non9iolence &as im5 %ortant to t6e ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement 8ecause some key lea3ers o- t6e
ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement5Aames ;armerC >ayar3 RustinC Aames La&son an3 2lenn Smiley56a3 stu3ie3 2an36iNs mo9ement an3 8ecame con9ince3 t6at non9io5 lence coul3 8e use3 8y 7-rican 7mericans. 733itionallyC Gan9hi became a hero an9 a source o6 ins/iration 6or 8artin &uther King Jr. It &as t6e 7merican ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement t6at %er-ecte3 an3 mo3erniBe3 non9iolent 3irect action. >ecause o- t6is ac6ie9ementC t6e ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement &as t6e ma:or 9e6icle t6rou/6 &6ic6 non9iolent 3irect action &as s%rea3 to ot6er mo9ements inter5 nationally. on>iolent 9irect action has enable9 o//resse9 grou/s
as 9i>erse as Alac' South <6ricansD <rabs o6 the 8i99le .astD an9 /ro;9emocrac) 9em; onstrators in !hina to en/a/e in collecti9e action. Lea3ers o- t6ese mo9ements 6a9e ackno&le3/e3 t6e 9alua8le lessons t6ey 6a9e learne3 -rom t6e ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement (see 0orris 1993). 7s 4arro& (199!) 6as %ointe3 outC non>iolent 9irect action is a /otent tool o6 collecti>e action because it generates 9isru/tion an9 uncertaint) that authorities must a99ress .
4arro& ca%ture3 6o& non9iolent 3irect action 6as s%rea3 3omestically an3 internationally -ollo&in/ t6e ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement &6en 6e &rote= >ecause the ci>il rights mo>ement 3e9elo%e3 a %o&er-ul tacticalC i3eolo/i5 calC an3 cultural re%ertoire o- collecti9e action a9aila8le to a &orl3&i3e au3i5 ence t6rou/6 mass me3ia an3 an eDtensi9e literatureC it has ser>e9 as a mo9el o6 collecti>e action nationally an3 internationally. 7&areness o- t6e ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement is so &i3es%rea3 /lo8ally t6at
o//resse9 /eo/le in 9istant lan9s see' out 'no0le9ge o6 its lessons so the) can em/lo) it in their o0n struggles. 1i--usion %rocesses are im%ortant in t6is re/ar3C 8ut t6ey merely com%lement t6e acti9e %ursuit o- in-ormation %ertainin/
to t6e ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement 8y t6ose &is6in/ to en/a/e in collecti9e action 6ere an3 a8roa3. 46e national ant6em o- t6e ci9il ri/6ts mo9ementC K"e S6all *9ercomeCK con5 tinues to ener/iBe an3 stren/t6en t6e resol9e o- social mo9ements &orl3&i3e.
9isru/ti>e or ma9. :he) are the techniHues o6 outsi9ers an3 stran/ers. Aust as nineteent65century &omen &riters use3 ma3ness to sym8oliBe esca%e -rom limite3 an3 enclose3 li9esC n! so t&entiet65century 6eminist scholars ha>e 9e>elo/e9 9issonant metho9s to sha'e the com/lacent an9 boun9e9 9isci/lines in 0hich the) 0or'. 7t t6e same timeC most 6eminists are constraine9 b) their en>ironment. I6 0e 0ant to achie>e changeD 0e must learn an9 use the language an9 metho9s o6 the 9ominant or9er.
:he state can a9>ance /rogress ( human rights are an eEam/le. Aur'e;,hite + ("illiam ".C Lecturer o- ,u8lic an3 International 7--airs at ,rinceton .C %!e 0arvard
$nvironmental 2aw (eview 9. 1)C S%rin/C %. 2((52())A0
46e social 8elie-s eD%lanation 8e/ins -rom t6e %ro%osition t6at in3i9i3uals &it6in 6uman ri/6ts %rotectin/ states s6are a %re-erence -or a minimum set o- %rotections o- 6uman ri/6ts. 46is assum%tion is a%%ro%riate -or t&o reasons. ;irstC accor3in/ to li8eral %olitical
science t6eoryC state /olic) re/resents the /re6erences o6 some subset o6 the 9omestic /olic). n100 I6 t6e o8ser9e3 state /olic) is to /rotect human rightsD then at least some su8set o- t6e 9omestic /olic) must share that /re6erence. Secon3C e9en i6 in9i>i9uals 0ithin a 9omestic /olit) see' a >ariet) o6 9i66erentiate9 en9sD basic res/ect 6or human rights allo0s in9i>i9uals to /ursue 55to some 3e/ree at least55t6ose en9s as t6ey 3e-ine t6em. Li8eral t6eory t6us su//ests t6at in3i9i3uals &it6in a 6uman ri/6ts res%ectin/ state ten3
to su%%ort 8asic 6uman ri/6ts %ro9isions. 46e neDt ste% in t6e social 8elie-s ar/ument is to reco/niBe t6at res%ect -or 6uman ri/6ts 6as an in6erently uni9ersalist ten3ency. n101 nlike cultural or national ri/6tsC 6uman ri/6ts are :ust t6at556uman. 46ey a%%ly as muc6 Ge2()H to t6ose in3i9i3uals &it6in a 3omestic %olity as to t6ose outsi3e t6e %olity. Suc6 cosmo/olitan liberalism in9icates that
Jthe more /eo/le are 6reeD the better o66 all are.J n102 46e net result is t6at in9i>i9uals 0ithin a human rights res/ecting state ten9C on t6e a9era/eC to su//ort the human rights o6 in9i>i9uals in other states as 0ell. 2i9en a set o- uni9ersalist 6uman ri/6ts >alues in states t6at res%ect 6uman ri/6tsC t6e %olicy articulate3 8y t6e /o9ernment may 8e one &6ic6 res%ects 6uman ri/6ts at 6ome an3 9eman9s their /rotection a8roa3. 46is belie6 in a t6in set o- uni9ersal 6uman ri/6ts ma) cause the lea9ershi/ o6 the state to 6rame its securit) /olic) aroun9 that belie6 structure an9 to re6rain 6rom aggressi>e acts t6at &oul3 9iolate t6e 6uman ri/6ts o- citiBens at 6ome or a8roa3. 7s ,eter <atBenstein ar/uesC Ksecurit) interests are 9e6ine9 b) actors 0ho res/on9 to cultural 6actors .K n103 7cts o- international a//ression ten3 to im%in/e on t6e 6uman
ri/6ts o- in3i9i3uals in t6e tar/et state an3C at least tem%orarilyC limit t6eir -ree3om. 7-ter allC 8om8sC 8ulletsC 3eat6 an3 3estruction are not consistent &it6 res%ect -or 8asic 6uman ri/6ts. n10! ;rame3 in t6e li8eral international relations t6eory terms o- %olicy inter3e%en3enceC international a//ression 8y State < im/oses costs on State AD 0hose citizensS human rights 0ill be in6ringe9 u/on b) the act o6 aggression. 46is in-rin/ement in turn im%oses costs on citiBens in State 7C &6ose citiBens 6a9e a %re-erence -or t6e %rotection o- t6e 6uman ri/6ts o- citiBens in 8ot6 states. :his share9 >alue o6 res/ect 6or human
rights thus ma) restrain State < 6rom /ursuing international aggression. n10' >y contrastC a state 0hich commits gross human rights 9iolations a/ainst its o&n %eo%le 0ill not be sub?ect to this restraint. Suc6 9iolations o-ten occur &6en t6e /o9ernment 6as 8een Kca%ture3K 8y a select minority t6at c6ooses to 9iolate 6uman ri/6ts. I- t6e citiBens t6emsel9es are not in -a9or o- 6uman ri/6ts at 6omeC t6ey are unlikely to 8e committe3 to t6e
en-orcement o- 6uman ri/6ts a8roa3. "6ere ca%ture occursC t6e /o9ernment is not res%onsi9e to t6e %re-erences o- t6e 3omestic %olity.
6eminism sho0s 0h) the) 9o not use it 0ell. I6 6eminism turns its bac' on t6e centers o- /o0erD /ri>ilegeD an9 in9i>i9ual achie>ement t6at men 6a9e mono%oliBe3C t6ose men 0ill continue to mono/olize themD an9 nothing si/ni-icant 0ill change. Feminists cannot un9ermine masculinist >alues 0ithout entering some o- t6e centers o- /o0er t6at -oster t6emC 8ut t6e attainment o- suc6 %o&er itselreIuires at least a%%earin/ to -oster t6ose 9alues. StillC 0ithout being 0illing to ris' such co o/tationD 6eminism can be onl) a moral /osition o6 critiHue rather than a 6orce 6or institutional change . 1es%ite its
intentionC I -ear t6at /ynocentric -eminism may 6a9e t6e same conseIuence as t6e stance o- moral mot6er6oo3 t6at /re& out onineteent6 century -eminism a rese/re/ation o- &omen to a s%eci-ically &omenNs s%6ereC outsi3e t6e sites o- %o&erC %ri9ile/eC an3 reco/nition. ;or me t6e sym%tom 6ere is &6at t6e 3ominant culture -in3s more t6reatenin/. "it6in t6e 3ominant culture a mi33le a/e3 asserti9e &omanNs claim to coanc6or t6e ne&s alon/si3e a man a%%ears consi3era8ly more t6reatenin/ t6an &omenNs claim to 6a9e a 3i--erent 9oice t6at eD%oses masculinist 9alues as 8o3y 3enyin/ an3 sel-is6. 46e claim o- &omen to 6a9e a ri/6t to t6e %ositions an3 8ene-its t6at 6a9e 6it6erto 8een reser9e3 -or menC an3 t6at male 3ominate3 institutions s6oul3 ser9e &omenNs nee3sC is a 3irect t6reat to male %ri9ile/e. "6ile t6e claim t6at t6ese %ositions o- %o&er t6emsel9es s6oul3 8e eliminate3 an3 t6e institutions eliminate3 or restructure3 is in3ee3 more ra3icalC &6en asserte3 -rom t6e /ynocentric -eminist %osition it can 8e an o8:ecti9e retreat.
G)nocentrism-s 6ocus on >alues an9 language as the /rimar) target o6 its critiHue contributes to this blunting o6 its /olitical 6orce. "it6out 3ou8tC social change reHuires changing the sub?ectD 0hich in turn means 9e>elo/ing ne0 0a)s o6 s/ea'ingC &ritin/C an3 ima/inin/. $Iually in3u8ita8le is t6e /ynocentric -eminist
claim t6at masculinist 9alues in "estern culture 3eny t6e 8o3yC sensualityC an3 roote3ness in nature an3 t6at suc6 3enial nurtures -ascismC %ollutionC an3 nuclear /ames. 2i9en t6ese -actsC 6o&e9erC &6at s6all &e 3oV 4o t6is g)nocentrism has little
concrete ans0er. Aecause its criticism o6 eEisting societ) is so global an9 abstractD g)nocentric critiHue o- 9aluesC lan/ua/eC an3 culture o6 masculinism can remo>e 6eminist theor) 6rom anal)sis o6 s/eci6ic institutions an9 /racticesD an9 ho0 the) might be concretel) structurall) change9 in 9irections more consonant 0ith our >isions.
re%resente3 in t6is sym%osium. Feminist metho9s em/hasize con>ersations an9 9ialogue rather than the /ro9uction o6 a singleD trium/hant truth. n1 :he) 0ill not lea9 to neat JlegalJ ans0ers because the) are challenging the >er) categories o6 Jla0J an3 Knonla&.K Feminist metho9s see' to eE/ose an9 Huestion t6e limite3 8ases o- international la&Ns claim to ob?ecti>it) an3 im%artiality an3 insist on t6e im%ortance o- /en3er relations as a cate/ory o- analysis. 46e term K/en3erK 6ere re-ers to t6e social construction o3i--erences 8et&een &omen an3 men an3 i3eas o- K-emininityK an3 KmasculinityK 55 t6e eDcess cultural 8a//a/e associate3 &it6 8iolo/ical seD.
,e can use the state to 6ight against o//ression an9 >iolence. Derri9a 2K (AacIuesC ;renc6 ,6iloso%6erC
G6tt%=//culturemac6ine.tees.ac.uk/Cmac6/>ackissues/:002/articles/artQ3err.6tmH 71= (/2+/10)A0
U= 4&o essential %ro8lems o- /lo8alisation are t6e 3issolution o- t6e state an3 t6e im%otence o- %olitics. In your recently %u8lis6e3 teDt NCosmo%olites 3e tous les %aysC encore un e--ort]NC you 3e9elo% certain i3eas concernin/ a ne& ri/6t to asylum an3 a ne& 8alance o%o&er 8et&een t6e 3i--erent %laces o- t6e %olitical in 9ie& o- a %ossi8le ne& role o- t6e city. .o& 3o you t6ink %6iloso%6y coul3 an3 s6oul3 react to t6e %ro8lems mentione3 &it6 a kin3 o- institutional -antasyV A1= I am not sure I un3erstan3 &6at you call Ninstitutional -antasyN. 7ll %olitical eD%erimentation like t6e initiati9e o- t6e Nre-u/ee cityNC 3es%ite its limits an3 its ine9ita8ly %reliminary c6aracterC 6as in it a %6iloso%6ical 3imension. It reIuires us to interro/ate t6e essence an3 t6e 6istory o- t6e state. 7ll %olitical inno9ation touc6es on %6iloso%6y. 46e NtrueN %olitical action al&ays en/a/es &it6 a %6iloso%6y . 7ll actionC all /olitical 9ecision ma'ingD must
in>ent its norm or rule. Such a gesture tra>erses or im/lies /hiloso/h). 0ean&6ileC at t6e risk oa%%earin/ sel-5contra3ictoryC I 8elie9e t6at one must 6ight against that 0hich )ou call the S9issolution o6 the stateS "6or the state can in turn limit the /ri>ate 6orces o6 a//ro/riationD the concentrations o6 economic /o0erD it can retar9 a >iolent 9e/oliticisation that acts in the name o6 the Smar'etS )C an3 a8o9e
all resist t6e state &6ere it /i9es in too easily to t6e nationalism o- t6e nation state or to t6e re%resentation o- socio5economic 6e/emony. $ac6 time one must analyseC in9ent a ne& rule= 6ere to contest t6e stateC t6ere to consoli3ate it. :he realm o6 /olitics is not co;
eEtensi>e 0ith the stateC contrary to &6at one 8elie9es no&a3ays. :he necessar) re/oliticisation 9oes not nee9 to ser>e a ne0 cult o6 the state. *ne ou/6t to o%erate &it6 ne& 3issociations an3 acce%t com%leD an3 3i--erentiate3 %ractices.
cam/aigns 6or anti;9iscrimination legislation an9 litigation o6 gen9er;eHuit) claims 0ere signi6icant a9>ances 6or 0omen achie>e9 through the normati>e 9iscourses an3 %u8lic institutions c6aracteristic o6 liberal 9emocracies. "omen also 6a9e stru//le3 in Sout6 7-rica an3 in t6e -ormer So9iet 8loc to secure 8asic 3emocratic /uarantees. :he continue9 integrit) o6 the state s)stems through 0hich these aims ha>e been met is a matter to0ar9 0hich 0omen cannot be in9i66erentC t6eoretically or ot6er&ise.
Greater engagementD not re?ectionD o6 the mo9ern state is 'e) to sol>e Aal90in $3 (0ar/aretC 7ssoc. ,ro- La& S ;S C S%rin/ 199)C E,u8lic "omen an3 t6e ;eminist StateCF 20 .ar9.
"omen#s L.A. !)C % 9+)I0 Feminist /olitical theorists a9>ocate stronger mo9els o6 grou/ re/resentation an3 %artici%ation as a structural
res%onse to t6is %ro8lem. 46ese %ro%osals 3ra& si/ni-icant ins%iration -rom t6e role o- consciousness5raisin/ in -eminist %olitical %ractice. :he intense in>ol>ement these /ro/osals reHuire o6 citizens C to/et6er &it6 t6e locally 8ase3 institutions u%on &6ic6 t6ey 3e%en3C challenge the 3istance3C 6ormalize9 9ecision;ma'ing that 6lattens 0omen-s /artici/ation an9 6urthers the 6alse uni>ersalism o6 the interests re/resente9 in the /ublic s/here . 4o t6at eDtentC
6eminists ha>e /artici/ate9 in the localizing 9iscourse characteristic o6 man) mo9ern attac's on the liberal state. ;urt6erD 6eminists o6ten theorize G0omenF as a 9istinct /olitical classC 8ot6 &it6in eDistin/ state 8or3ers an3 irres%ecti9e o- state citiBens6i%sD thus a9>ocating a 6orm o6 nationalist i9entit) in9e/en9ent o6 territorial a66iliation. ,omen-s interestsC an3 &omen#s commitments an3 con-lictsC t6en are alrea9) 9ee/l) 0o>en into the 0eb o6 contem/orar) contests o>er the nature an9 6uture o6 the liberal state .
,or'ing 0ithin 9ominant institutions sub>erts 9escri/ti>e 9ichotomiesD to inclu9e 0omen Aal90in $3 (0ar/aretC 7ssoc. ,ro- La& S ;S C S%rin/ 199)C E,u8lic "omen an3 t6e ;eminist StateCF 20 .ar9.
"omen#s L.A. !)C % 102)I0
46is &i3e5an/le %resentation ine9ita8ly -or-eits t6e com%leDity an3 nuance o- a more ti/6tly -ocuse3 an3 t6orou/6ly ren3ere3 account o- a sin/le as%ect o- &omen#s %u8lic or %ri9ate eD%erience. Oet I 6o%e to recou% t6at loss 8y t6e /ain in t6eoretical %ers%ecti9e accesse3 8y t6e 8roa3er 9ie&. 7s Carole ,ateman 6as su//este3C such a 6rame0or' ma) also be able to 9econstruct the 9escri/ti>e 9ichotomies that ensnare our theoretical imaginations an9 tell lies about the con9itions o6 0omen-s real li>es . 46e reco/nition that 0omen are situate9 in one 6orm or another Gas 0omenF in 8ot6 %ri9ate an3 %u8lic s%6eres alrea9) begins to
un9ermine 6eminism-s t)/ical un9erstan9ing o6 0omen-s central /olitical challenge as the mo>ement 6rom 0holesale eEclusion to /ublic inclusion. Carole ,ateman eD%lains= E7 -eminist strate/y t6at calls -or t6e inte/ration into citiBens6i% o&omen#s 3istincti9e contri8ution Y rests on t6e assum%tion t6at R&omen# an3 R3i--erence# nee3 to 8e 8rou/6t into t6e %olitical or3er. :he /ertinent Huestion is assume9 to be 0hether seEual 9i66erence is /oliticall) rele>antD or ho0 P9i66erence- coul9 be rele>ant. :hus the >ital Huestion is o>erloo'e9 o6 ho0 to sub>ert an9 change the manner in 0hich 0omen ha>e alrea9) been incor/orate9C an3 so to trans-orm t6e relation 8et&een ReIuality# (men) an3 R3i--erence# (&omen).F 46e -act that the /ublic s/here alrea9) inclu9es 0omenC e9en i- not as -ullC sel-53eterminin/ citiBensC suggests that the matter o6 inclusion is alrea9) more com/licate9 than a single 6ocus on 0omen-s relegation to the /ri>ate s/here might im/l). ConseIuentlyC to t6e eDtent t6at a &i3e5an/le %ers%ecti9e can account -or t6e 3i--erential treatment o- &omen &it6in an3 across t6e
%u8lic an3 %ri9ate s%6eresC t6e more com%re6ensi9e t6e analysis o- &omen#s %olitical situation.
la0. or 9oes it challenge la0 /er seI it merel) challenges the eHuit) o6 the com/osition o6 its organs as 0ell as some o6 the substanti>e results o6 the 0orl9 /ublic or9er . 7-ter allC 6uman ri/6ts are only one %art ointernational la&. In any caseC t6is criticism is 0ea'ene9 b) the 6act that most 6eminists ha>eD so 6arD largel) ignore9 the /rogress o6 the international legal s)stem in its substanti>e stan9ar9s /rotecting 0omenSs rights. 46e ar/ument t6at international la& is really :ust Kinternational menNs la&K &oul3 6a9e 8een muc6 more con9incin/ %rior to
19!'. C6arles&ort6C C6inkinC an3 "ri/6t really 3o not take issue 3irectly &it6 t6e international le/al system eDce%t inso-ar as it re-lects t6e %attern o- male 3ominance at t6e state le9el. G$n3 ,a/e )30H < critiHue o6 the international legal s)stem must also assess the eEtent to 0hich international la0 has incor/orate9 a J0omanSs >oice K re-lecti9e o- &omenNs eD%eriences an3 6asC in -actC %rotecte3 t6e ri/6ts it %romises t6em on %a%er. Suc6 a critiIue must conclu3e t6atC since the Secon9 ,orl9 ,arD international la0 has increasingl) em/hasize9 eIualityC inclusi9enessC coo%erationC carin/ a8out in3i9i3ualsC an3 ot6er as%ects o- the ethic o6 careC 8ut t6at %ro/ress remains ina3eIuate. It isC 6o&e9erC a9eHuate to /ro>e
that 6eminists shoul9 not 9iscount re6orm o6 eEisting la0sD instea9 o6 re?ection o6 themD as a means o6 /rogress.
.m/iricall) /ro>en ( re9istribution o6 rights is e66ecti>el) initiate9 through the stateD the 6eminist mo>ement hasn-t 6oun9 its me9ium )et 8orris $$ (7l3onC Sociolo/y S Nort6&esternC 7nnual Re9ie& o- Sociolo/y 9ol. 2'C %. '29)I0
46e most 3istincti9e as%ect o- t6e mo3em ci9il ri/6ts mo9ement &as its 3emonstration t6at an
o//resse9D relati>el) /o0erless grou/D can generate so; cial changeD through the o//ressi>e stateD 0ith the 0i9es/rea9 use o6 social /rotest. ;or nearly t&o 3ec5 a3esD this mo>ement /er6ecte9 the art o6 social /rotest. 46e -ar ran/in/ an3 com%leD social %rotest it /enerate3 3i3 not emer/e imme3iately. Rat6er it e>ol>e9 through time ma'ing use o6 trial an9 error. >y t6e mi3 19'0s Sout6ern >lack lea3ers 6a3 not yet -ully /ras%e3 t6e i3ea t6at t6e -ate o- Aim Cro& reste3 in t6e 6an3s ot6e >lack masses. $9en t6ou/6 %rotest a/ainst racial ineIuality occurre3 t6rou/6out t6e -irst 6al- o- t6e cen5 turyC it ten3e3 to 8e localiBe3 an3 limite3 in sco%e. "it6 t6e eDce%tion o- t6e 2ar9ey 0o9ement an3 7 ,6ili% Ran3ol%6Ns 0arc6 *n "as6in/ton 0o9e5 ment (0*"0)C t6e mass 8ase o- t6e %rior %rotests &as too restricte3 to t6reaten t6e Aim Cro& or3er. >ot6 t6e 2ar9ey an3 0*"0 mo9ements 6a3 limite3 /oals an3 &ere relati9ely s6ort li9e3. >y 19'0 the legal metho9 0as the 9ominant 0ea/on o6
Alac' /rotestD an9 it reHuire9 s'ille9 la0)ers rather than mass action. :he legal metho9 9e/en9e9 on the actions o6 elites eDternal to t6e >lack community &6ere8y >lacks 6a3 to 6o%e t6at &6ite :u3/es an3 Su%reme Court
:ustices &oul3 issue -a9ora8le rulin/s in res%onse to &ell5reasone3 an3 &ell5ar/ue3 court cases. 46e 19'' 0ont/omeryC 7la8amaC year5lon/ mass58ase3 8us 8oycott an3 t6e un-ol3in/ 3eca3e o- >lack %rotest c6an/e3 all t6is. 46ese 9e>elo/ments thrust the /o0er ca/able o6 o>erthro0ing Jim !ro0 into the han9s o6 the Alac' communit). 4utsi9e elitesD inclu9ing the courtsD the Fe9eral Go>ernmentD an3 sym%at6etic &6itesC 0oul9 still ha>e roles to /la). .o&e9erC massi9e >lack %rotest 3ictate3 t6at those roles 0oul9 be in res/onse to Alac' collecti>e action rat6er t6an as catalysts -or c6an/e in t6e racial or3er. 7 3ecisi9e s6i-t in t6e %o&er eIuation 8et&een &6ites an3 >lacks /re& out o- t6e stru//le to 3ese/re5 /ate 7la8ama 8uses.
assum/tion that it is re/resentations that ma'e action /ossible is ina9eHuate 8y itsel-. PoliticalD militar) an9 economic structuresC institutionsC 3iscursi9e net&orks an3 lea3ers6i% are all crucial in eD%lainin/ social action an3 s6oul3 8e t6eoriBe3 to/et6er &it6 re%resentational %ractices.
>ot6 6ere an3 earlierC 1al8y#s reasonin/ inclines to&ar3s a -orm o- i3ealism. In res%onse to 1al8y#s -i-t6 %oint (&it6 its t6ree su8%oints)C it is &ort6 notin/C -irstC t6at 6is 8ook is a8out t6e C,1C not t6e Rea/an a3ministration. .e analyBes certain C,1 3iscoursesC root t6e /eo/ra%6ical reasonin/ %ractices o- t6e Rea/an a3ministration nor its %u8lic5%olicy reasonin/ on national security. 1al8y#s 8ook is narro&ly teDtualJ t6e /eneral conteDtuality o- t6e Rea/an a3ministration is not 3ealt &it6. Secon3C let me sim%ly note t6at I -in3 t6at t6e 3istinction 8et&een critical t6eorists an3 %oststructuralists is a little too ri/i3ly an3 6eroically 3ra&n 8y 1al8y an3 ot6ers. 46ir3C 1al8y#s inter%retation o- t6e reconce%tualiBation o- national security in 0osco& as 6ea9ily in-luence3 8y 3issi3ent %eace researc6ers in $uro%e is 6i/6ly i3ealistC an inter%retation t6at i/nores t6e structural an3 i3eolo/ical crises -acin/ t6e So9iet elite at t6at time. 2or8ac6e9#s re-orms an3 6is ne& security 3iscourse &ere also stron/ly sel-intereste3C an ultimately -utile attem%t to sa9e t6e Communist ,arty an3 a 3iscre3ite3 re/ime o- %o&er -rom 3isinte/ration. 46e issues raise3 8y Simon 1al8y in 6is comment are im%ortant ones -or all t6ose intereste3 in t6e %ractice o- critical /eo%olitics. "6ile I a/ree &it6 1al8y t6at Iuestions o- 3iscourse are eDtremely im%ortant ones -or %olitical /eo/ra%6ers to en/a/eC t6ere is a 3an/er o- 6etishizing t6is concern
0ith 9iscourse so t6at &e neglect t6e institutional an3 t6e sociologicalC t6e materialist an3 t6e culturalC t6e /olitical an9 t6e geogra/hical conteEts 0ithin 0hich %articular 9iscursi>e strategies become signi6icant. Critical /eo%oliticsC in ot6er &or3sC s6oul3 not 8e a %risoner o- t6e s&ee%in/ a6istorical cant
t6at sometimes accom%anies R%oststructuralism nor con9enient rea3in/ strate/ies like t6e i3entity %olitics narrati9eJ it nee3s to al&ays 8e o%en to t6e %atterne3 mess t6at is 6uman 6istory.
:here is nothing outsi9e o6 9iscourseD it is sim/l) 9iscourse. Kau6man $1(AillC %ro-essorC 1e%artment o- S%eec6 Communication 7n3 1ramatic 7rtsC Central 0ic6i/an
ni9ersity E*t6er &ays= ,ostmo3ernism an3 %er-ormance %raDisF 46e Sout6ern Communication Aournal Lol. (0C Iss. 3J %/. 222C 11 %/s %roIuest)7U> I- t6e lack o- consistency 8et&een %ostmo3ernismNs sel-5style3 alle/iance to t6e o%%ositional an3 its colla8oration &it6 t6e eDistin/ state o- aca3emic %ractice &ere its only s6ortcomin/C it s6oul3 8e enou/6 to %re9ent us -rom unIuestionin/ly em8racin/ it as a t6eory. 0ore 3isIuietin/ stillC 6o&e9erC is its /ostulation o6 the 0a) the 0orl9 aroun9 us 0or's. :heor) t6at %resumes to talk a8out culture must stan9 the test o6 realit). *rC as 7n3re& <in/ statesC Kculture is 0here 0e li>e an9 are sustaine9. <n) 9octrine that stri'es at its root ought to be care6ull) scrutinize9K (%ersonal communicationC ;e8ruary 11C 199!). I- one su8:ects t6e %remise o- %ostmo3ernism to scrutinyC t6e conseIuences are 8ot6 untena8le an3 3istur8in/. In its ele>ation o6 language to the /rimar) anal)sis o6 social li6e an9 its relegation o6 the 9e;centere9 sub?ect to a set o6 language /ositionsD /ostmo9ernism ignores the 0a) real /eo/le ma'e their 0a) in the 0orl9. "6ile t6e notion o- 3ecenterin/ 3oes muc6 to reme3y t6e i3ea o- an essentialC unc6an/in/ sel-C it also %resents %ro8lems. 7ccor3in/ to Clarke (1991)= .a9in/ esta8lis6e3 t6e material Iuality o- i3eolo/yC e9eryt6in/ else &e 6a3 6it6erto t6ou/6t o- as material 6as 3isa%%eare3. :here is nothing outsi9e o6 i3eolo/y (or 9iscourse). "6ere 7lt6usser &as concerne3 &it6 i3eolo/y as the imaginar) relations o6 sub?ects to t6e real relations o- t6eir eDistenceC t6e connecti9e Iuality o- t6is 9ie& o- i3eolo/y has been 9issol>e9 because it la)s claim to an outsi9eC a realC an eDtra53iscursi9e 6or 0hich there eEists no e/istemological 0arrant 0ithout la/sing bac' into the ba9 ol9 0a)s o6 em/iricism or meta/h)sics . (%%. 2'52() Clarke eD%lains 6o& t6e same 3isconnection 8et&een t6e 3iscursi9e an3 t6e eDtra53iscursi9e 6as 8een %er-orme3 in semiolo/ical analysis= "6ere it use3 to contain a relation 8et&een t6e si/ni-ier (t6e re%resentation) an3 t6e si/ni-ie3 (t6e re-erent)C antiem%iricism 6as taken t6e -ormal ar8itrariness o- t6e connection 8et&een t6e si/ni-ier an3 si/ni-ie3 an3 re%lace3 it &it6 t6e a8olition o- t6e si/ni-ie3 (t6ere can 8e no real o8:ects out t6ereC 8ecause t6ere is no out t6ere -or real o8:ects to 8e). (%. 2()
control more in6ormation about our /ersonal li>es. "illiams an3 S:8or/ maintain that /o0er6ul J4thersJ are the ones 0ho social scientists are reluctant to un9erstan9 because J'no0le9ge o6 such /ersons coul9 un9ermine the legitimac) o6 the u//er sectors o6 societ)K (1993C %. 190). ,er-ormance o- %o&er &oul3 inclu3e narrati9es ocor%orate eDecuti9esC %oliticiansC la&yersC teac6ersC :u3/esC 3octorsC researc6ersC military comman3ersC %u8lic a3ministratorsC sc6ool o--icialsC an3 la& en-orcement %ersonnel. :hese /eo/le are J4therJ to man) o6 usC 8ut 8ecause t6eir 9alues set t6e stan3ar3 -or our o&n com-orta8le mi33le class li9esC &e o-ten 3o not %ercei9e t6em as suc6.(+) ,er-ormance o- &6iteness %oses t6e %ro8lem o- intro3ucin/ still anot6er monolit6ic cate/ory to our %ractice an3 &oul3 t6us 6a9e to 8e a%%roac6e3 &it6 t6e kin3 o- caution reIuire3 -or all suc6 %er-ormances. La8elin/ it as suc6C 6o&e9erC &oul3 6ol3 t&o %otential a39anta/es. ,er-ormance o- &6iteness &oul3 eD%an3 t6e teDts no& un3er consi3eration to inclu3e &6ite su%remacy /rou%sC skin6ea3sC an3 ot6er or/aniBations &6ose rise in t6is country an3 t6rou/6out t6e &orl3 s6oul3 not 8e i/nore3. "6ile the) usuall) lac' the institutional /o0er o- t6e ot6er /rou%s mentione3C t6eir narrati9es 6ol3 an o89ious key to eD%lainin/ t6e 3enial an3 -ear t6at more su8tly moti9ate t6ose &it6 institutional %o&er. ,er-ormance o- &6iteness an3 %o&er also o--ers an o%%ortunity to &6ite %eo%le to %ercei9e oursel9es as K*t6er.K It enables us to 9econstruct &6at Connor (19+9) calls Kthe >er) structures o6 the 9ominant an9 marginalK b) critiHuing the 9ominant (%.233). 7s a corollary to %er-ormance o- &6itenessC &e mi/6t %er-orm t6e -ra/mente3 %rocess 8y &6ic6 &e 8uil3 %erce%tions o- someone &6o is 3i--erent -rom us. 46is %er-ormance o- our sense o- 3i--erence mi/6t -ocus u%on t6e %oliticalC economicC seDualC an3 et6nic s6ar3s t6at construct K*t6erness.K Suc6 a %rocess &oul3 6el% us res%on3 to 6ookNs (1992) %ro%osal to Kinterrogate the 0a) assuming the /osition o6 an outsi9er loo'ing inD as 0ell as inter/reterD canD an9 o6ten 9oesD /er>ert an9 9istort oneSs /ers/ecti>eK (%%. 1'25'3). 7s <oBol (1992) recommen3s= K0ore %eo%le 6a9e to concentrate on 6o& &e %er%etrate t6e 3istortionsK in9ol9e3 in %erce%tions o- %eo%le as K*t6ers.K
Discourse o6 the GotherF can create negati>e images that tri>ialize the other. Kau6man $1(AillC %ro-essorC 1e%artment o- S%eec6 Communication 7n3 1ramatic 7rtsC Central 0ic6i/an
ni9ersity E*t6er &ays= ,ostmo3ernism an3 %er-ormance %raDisF 46e Sout6ern Communication Aournal Lol. (0C Iss. 3J %/. 222C 11 %/s %roIuest)7U> I 3i3 not &ant to %artici%ate in creatin/ t6e illusion t6at i-C oneC sayC /oes to an au3itorium...an3 6ears someone s%eak a8out con3itions in one country or anot6er an3 t6en 6as &ine an3 c6eese a-ter&ar3 &it6 t6e %erson &6o is s%eakin/ an3 /oes 6ome to t6e li-e an3 t6e li-e 3oes not c6an/e at all...t6at one 6as 3one t6eir %art. (%%. (35(!) !onsuming au9iences ten9 to res/on9 0ell to the assurance that there is no threat o6 real 9i66erence that might reHuire change in thought or action. In t6e ser9ice o- t6is reassuranceC commo3i-ication o- ot6er cultures -osters stereoty%es. Sim%li-ie3C staticC easily accessi8le ima/es are %acka/e3 an3 %ro:ecte3C -ittin/ into %re5esta8lis6e3 -rames o- re-erence. :hese 6iEe9 6ormsC %resentin/ essentialist i9eas o6 a grou/ o6 /eo/leD ma) be %ositi9e as &ell as negati>e. 7s 6ooks (1990C 1992) %oints outC goo9 stereot)/es an9 imager) can also be 9amaging. Romantic an9 essentialize9 images o6 o//resse9 /eo/le can tri>ialize their struggle. &um/ing /eo/le to/et6er in categories o- K*t6erK can ha>e the same e66ect. 2rou%s are con-erre3 &it6 clusters o- common attri8utes 8ase3 %rimarily u%on t6eir relati9e lack o- %o&er &it6in t6e social 6ierarc6y. Im/osition o6 the J4therJ label mas's 9istinctions 0ithin a grou/D such as raceC classC seEC a/eC seDual %re-erenceC 9aluesC reli/ionC %oliticsC an3 /eo/ra%6ic /enealo/y. In9i>i9uals 6rom marginalize9 grou/s ob?ect to the 9ouble stan9ar9 b) 0hich in9i>i9uals 6rom the 9ominant culture can see themsel>es as uniHue but thrust u/on J4thersJ the bur9en o6 being a s/o'es/erson 6or the entire grou/ o6 0hich their /ercei>e9 J4thernessJ ma'es them a member (0ooreC 1992J "6iteC 1992). In 3iscourses o- su8:ecti9ityC 3etails a8out a %erson matter. 7s 0in656a (19+9) reasonsC 3etails a8out a %erson 6el% to re&rite t6em as su8:ect (!2).
7istor) is the 9ominant tool that sha/es realit). Ro90ell 1(Aonat6anC Lecturer in ,olitics at 0anc6ester 0etro%olitan ni9ersity 1e%artment o- ,6iloso%6y an3
,oliticsC E4ren3y >ut $m%ty= 7 Res%onse to Ric6ar3 AacksonF )7U> :he issue o6 the material real 0orl9D or Pe>i9ence- is actuall) the issue at the heart o6 the 0ea'ness o6 %ost5 structural 9iscourse anal)sisC t6ou/6 it 3oes 6ol3 t6e %otential to at least rescue some o- it#s use-ulness. 46e %ro8lem is sim%leC in t6at the onl) 0a) Aackson or any /ost;structuralist can o/erationalise their argument is 0ith an a//eal to material e>i9ence. >ut b) the logic o6 9iscourse anal)sis there is no such thing as neutral Pe>i9ence-. 4o sIuare t6is circle many %ost5struturalist &riters 3o seem to 6int at com%leDity an3 &6at %ost5 structural culturalists mi/6t call RinterteDtuality#C ar/uin/ -or R-a9ourin/ a com%leDity o- interactions# rat6er t6an Rlinear causality#N>iiiO. :he im/lication is that language is ?ust one o6 an en9less 0eb o6 6actors an9 surel) this /rom/ts one to /ursue an un9erstan9ing o6 these lin's. .o&e9erC to 3o so &oul3 3an/erously un3ermine t6e entire %ost5structural %ro:ect as a/ainC i- t6ere are 3isco9era8le links 8et&een -actorsC t6en t6ere are material -acts t6at are i3enti-ia8le re/ar3less o- lan/ua/e. ConseIuentlyC rather than see'ing to un9erstan9 the lin's bet0een 6actors 0hat seems to ha//en is han9s are thro0n u/ in 9es/air as the search 6or com/leEit) is 9ro//e9 as Huic'l) as it is /ic'e9 u/. 46e result is one53imensional ar/uments t6at a/ain can say little. 46is is e9i3ent in Aackson#s a%%roac6 as 6e 3etails 6o& &or3s 6a9e 6istories an3 moreo9er are %art o- a 3ialectic %rocess in &6ic6 Rt6ey not only s6a%e social structures 8ut are also s6a%e3 8y t6em#.GiDH .o&e9er &e 3o not t6en see any 3iscussion o- &6et6erC t6ere-oreD it is not 9iscourse that is the /o0er6ul tool but the e66ect o6 the histor) an3 t6e social structure itsel-. 46rou/6out Aackson#s ar/ument it is a to% 3o&n %rocess in &6ic6 3iscourse 3isci%lines society to -ollo& t6e 3esire o- t6e 3ominantC 8ut 6ere is an instance o- a 3ialectic %rocess &6ere society may actually 8e t6e ori/inatin/ -orceC allo&in/ t6e 3iscourse in turn to actually to 8e more %o&er-ul. .o&e9er 0e sim/l) see no eE/loration o6 this /otential 9ialectic /rocessD merel) the suggestion it eEists.