Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Toronto Torah
Azariah were commanded to bow was not an idol, but a regular statue of the king. Therefore, it was not "classic" idolatry, such that one would be obligated to surrender his life rather than bow before it. However, according to Tosafot, what did Chananiah, Mishael and Azariah learn from the frogs? How will we explain the words of Todos? We can try to answer this question through the words of the Rambam (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah 5:4): "If anyone for whom it is said, 'Transgress and do not sacrifice your life,' sacrifices his life and does not transgress, he is held accountable for his life. If anyone about whom it is said, 'Sacrifice your life and do not transgress,' sacrifices his life and does not transgress, he sanctifies [G-d's] Name. If he does so in the presence of ten Jews, he sanctifies [G-d's] name in public, like Daniel, Chananiah, Mishael, Azariah, and Rabbi Akiva and his colleagues." The Rambam seems to give us three categories: One who is not allowed to sacrifice his life; One who is allowed to do so; One who is in front of ten Jews. It is clear that Chananiah, Mishael and Azariah are counted in the third group. The Rambam sheds more light on this subject in his Book of Mitzvot (Mitzvah 9): "[This is] similar to the actions of Chananiah, Mishael and Azariah in the days of the wicked Nevuchadnezzar, who forced people to bow down to a statue, and everyone including Jews bowed down. Nobody there sanctified G-d's Name, and this was a tremendous shame for the Jewish people. Everyone did not fulfill this mitzvah, there was
Hillel Horovitz
nobody to fulfill it; everyone was afraid." There are times when it is not obligatory to sanctify the name of G-d, but when no one does so then that, itself, is a disgrace for G-d's Name. Chananiah, Mishael and Azariah understood that even though it is not obligatory, everyone was watching; all of the Jews were looking on to see what they would do. That is when these men learned from the frogs. Within this understanding of the midrash, they understood that when it came to the frogs, each frog said, "Why should I be the one going in to the o v e n ?! " H o we ve r , ce r ta i n fr og s understood that if they wouldn't do it, no one would sanctify the name of G-d. It was up to them. From Chananiah, Mishael and Azariah we can learn that each and every one of us has the obligation to sanctify G-d's name, but from them we can also learn about the ability to draw lessons from anyone, even from frogs. hhorovitz@torontotorah.com
What is the link between our parshah and our haftorah? Yechezkel describes the Pharaoh of his time as arrogant in the extreme. He is depicted as a crocodile sprawled in the Nile the river upon which Egypt depends for its agriculture and wealth and his haughtiness is expressed in his declaration, "The Nile is mine; I am my own creator!" (29:3) The latter-day Pharaoh's arrogance mirrors that of the earlier Pharaoh in our parshah, who declares, "Who is Gd that I should listen to Him?" Indeed, our parshah's Pharaoh values only his independence and ego, ignoring the suffering of his own nation as he persists in his denial of G-d.
for reversing a sale apply. (Bava Metzia 51a, and see SMA 227:2 and Tashbetz 3:151) The "standard price" is evaluated based upon the practice of local vendors. Therefore, one who is able to manufacture an item more cheaply than others, or to import it from overseas, is allowed to charge at the same level as other local vendors. A consumer who knows that an item is going to appreciate soon due to external events is not required to inform the vendor. (Kinyan Torah 1:14, and see Rabbi Dr. Aaron Levine, Economic Public Policy and Jewish Law, pg. 121) The standard of 1/6 is relevant only to price, but not to quantity or number. Therefore, one who sells a bag of apples as required to make sure that its weight is as advertised, and must refund the value of any error, large or small. (Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 232:1) torczyner@torontotorah.com
Visit us at www.torontotorah.com
Biography
...
Regarding the topic of names from foreign languages: I have written that despite the fact that they are disgraceful, they are not forbidden, and this is why we have seen many names from the languages of many countries adopted over the course of the long exile, as we have moved among various countries... Additionally, [the names of] great figures among the great medieval commentators, such as the Magid Mishneh - whose name was Rabbeinu Vidal - and [of] many gaonim, as we find in the early responsa, and also the name Maimon, the father of the Rambam, appear to be from a foreign language. Therefore, we would not dare say that they acted inappropriately. After it became commonplace among Jews to use the se name s, there i s n o relationship between the name and any reason for disgrace. And we should not change [the practice] of calling our sons and daughters by the names of our male and female elders who were named with these foreign names, for this is a matter of familial respect. There is room to say that the praises that our sages (Vayikra Rabbah 32) expressed for the fact that they did not change their names during the exile in Egypt was because that was before the giving of the Torah, when there was no significant recognizable distinction [between Jews and non-Jews] solely on the basis of the seven Noachide laws [which Jews observed and non-Jews did not observe]. This is especially true given that a great portion of Israel also engaged in idol worship However, after the presentation of the Torah we have no legal obligation, and there is no matter of special care or ethical improvement involved, only the 613 mitzvot we were commanded, to observe throughout the generations, and the mitzvot which were commanded with a specific timeframe, as is explained in the Oral Torah. Because of this, our rabbis were not careful about this And even though everything I have said is logical, I hesitate to say it without good proof .
Visit us at www.torontotorah.com
Zionist activists, and wealthy Hungarian Jews. Judge Halevi acquitted Gruenwald of libel, writing, "By accepting this present, Kastner sold his soul to the devil." The Israeli government's decision to appeal on Kastner's behalf led to its collapse, as coalition members resigned. Kastner himself resigned from his position in the government, becoming a journalist. On the 27th of Tevet, 5717, Kastner was shot near his Tel Aviv home. The attack was carried out by three veterans from the pre-state Lechi militia. A year later, Israel's Supreme Court overturned most of the judgment against Kastner, concluding that "one cannot find moral fault in his behavior." Kastner trial, as it became known, revealed a deep, painful and still-present doubt in Israeli society: Did the Zionist movement do all in its power to save European Jewry? bweintraub@torontotorah.com
Speaker
R Weintraub Shabbaton R Baruch Weintraub R Baruch Weintraub R Baruch Weintraub R Baruch Weintraub R Baruch Weintraub Adam Frieberg
Topic
Shabbat Aliyah And I am of sealed lips Challenges & Opportunities
Yehoshua & Moshe
Location
Special Notes
Clanton Park Clanton Park Clanton Park Clanton Park Clanton Park Shaarei Shomayim
Yeshivat Or Chaim
THU. JAN. 2
Visit us at www.torontotorah.com
Clanton Park
8:30 PM