Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Honors 201
“One of the greatest men that had ever lived, without exception”(John) quoted
Thomas Jefferson concerning John Locke. Why did Thomas Jefferson believe that of all
the men who had lived prior to his own lifetime, John Locke was greatest? John Locke
had not won any great battle or conquered large sums of territory as Alexander the Great
had. He had not created or dreamed of great new machines like those of Leonardo Da
Vinci or changed theological understanding as Martin Luther had done. John Locke was
a simple physician for an English lord. The reason that John Locke was seen as a
colossus of history by Thomas Jefferson was because he had started a revolution of how
men saw each other and interacted with one another politically and socially. Jefferson
and many of the other founding fathers had read Locke and were greatly influenced by
his thoughts concerning man and his relationship to the government. Yet the founding
fathers were not the only group that was influenced by Locke. Through the study of
Locke’s writings and the precedent set by the Locke influenced founding fathers, many
influential American politicians and judges since the founding have been touched by his
ideas. This influence can be seen in the Constitution and its Bill of Rights as well as the
Declaration of Independence where Locke’s ideas concerning the rights of men, the
relationship of men, their government, and how the government should run are clearly
present.
2
But just as there are many ideas of Locke's that we have used and embraced in our
American system there are others that we have shunned. Having lived in the 17th century,
Locke’s ideas were very progressive but to the framers of the Constitution and those who
later amended it, many were seen as harmful or even antithetical to democracy. His ideas
that were elitist or even exclusive to certain groups were all but ignored, even damned by
need to first look at how Locke has influenced such vital American documents as the
Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and then we need to examine his ideas
that were not embraced because they show what our government should not be. In order
to better understand what we are, we also need to understand what we are not.
To begin with, one needs to look at possibly the most influential of Locke’s
works in regards to American political thought, especially in the time of the founding
fathers. In the Second Treatise of Government Locke discusses how people come to be in
a civil society and once in that society how the government should not act in regards to
those being governed. He begins by talking about the state of nature where all people are
completely free and independent to do as they please. Everyone is subject to natural law,
which protects our natural rights. Those natural rights are, life, liberty and the possession
of property. Those people living in the state of nature then have the right to execute
natural law by killing or enslaving the offender, if their natural rights are threatened.
People also amass property in the state of nature by adding their labor to the land and the
products of the land, then by bartering, and eventually by developing money and
gathering large amounts of property. Once people begin obtaining large amounts of
property they find that natural law is no longer an adequate protection for themselves.
3
They then enter into civil society, where they relinquish their freedom under natural law
and their right to execute law. Instead they establish a judicial power to arbitrate disputes
between members of the society, a legislative power to set laws that all the members of
the society must follow, and a executive power to maintain and enforce the law. Locke
separation of powers between the executive and legislative, the perogative of the
executive and the international powers of the commonwealth. According to Locke, this
government is valid as long as these three powers do not infringe on the rights of those
they are governing and if the government does not work towards the best interests of the
people, they have the right to dissolve the government and establish one that does work
The founding fathers, especially Thomas Jefferson, were greatly enamored with
John Locke and his Second Treatise of Government. They saw it as one of the pinnacle
writings on civil society and how it should function. By borrowing Locke’s ideas
concerning natural rights, the founding fathers expressed the fundamental values of the
new American government. Those ideas are found in the beginning of the Declaration of
Independence:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they
are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life
liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are
instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that
whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends it is the rights of
the people to alter or abolish it and to institute new government, laying its foundation on
such principals as to and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most
likely to effect their safety and happiness.”(Declaration)
4
Americans of our rights as citizens. Equality is a fundamental part of our thinking and
Locke not only believed in natural rights but he was also strongly opposed to the
divine right of Kings. He believed that people had the right to consent to a government
and that the people were the ultimate source of all lawmaking but if that government,
which the people submitted some of their rights, became abusive, the people had the
ability to take back their rights and try to change or outright overthrow the abusive
government. This can be seen in chapter fourteen of the Second Treatise of Government
where Locke writes “the people have the right to act as supreme, and continue the
legislative in themselves; or erect a new form, or under the old form place it in the new
hands, as they think good.”(Macpherson) At the time of the writing of the Declaration of
Independence, the founding fathers used Locke’s Second Treatise as a justification for
independence from Great Britain. Many Americans thought that the British parliament
and King George III had grievously impeded on their rights. Americans therefore used
Locke to justify their revolution. Thomas Jefferson used this theory when he wrote “It is
their right, their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their
and future revolutionaries would quote both Locke and the Declaration of Independence
to justify the overthrow of a corrupt and dictatorial power. This can be seen in the
Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen which was adopted by the National
there are some parts that the founding fathers chose to change. The founding fathers
realized that the Second Treatise of Government should not be seen as a utopian plan for
government. They thought that not every idea proposed in it should be used exactly as
states that natural rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Jefferson obviously
borrowed Locke’s rights which are life, liberty and property and changed property to
happiness. The substitution of one word for another drastically changes the meaning and
shows the difference in the two sets of rights. To understand this deviation is to better
Locke supports any form of government as long as it comes into power by the
will of the people and operates within the boundaries that the members of the society set
forth for it. Locke intended for his ideas to be used as a guideline towards the operation
of a just and well run government. Therefore, the early founders did not intend to form a
government based solely on all of Locke’s ideas. Thomas Jefferson, the writer of the
Declaration, built upon and altered many of Locke’s ideas. Instead of going with
property as a main right he chooses to go with happiness. This is because Locke’s basic
rights are only based on justice. Locke’s writings support government for the people but
not government by and of the people. He argued for just government, but only as a
really does not say that any form of government is better than any other except for
monarchies which he strongly cautions against. Locke does not care who rules as long as
they rule by the consent of the people and justly. The founding fathers had different
6
ideas. They thought that in order for the government to operate correctly the people had
to not only have their property protected but they also needed to have other rights
protected which they might value. The founders believed if those rights are protected it
would lead to a more effective form of self-government. People needed to express their
ideas, to be able to worship as they wish and to not have their privacy invaded. This
means they felt that it wasn’t just justice that a person needed, they also need fulfillment.
It wasn’t good enough that people’s rights were protected they saw that there was a part
of human nature that Locke missed: contentment. Jefferson agreed that property was an
essential human right but property was not the only thing necessary for optimum human
happiness. He thought that freedom of religion, press, privacy, etc also should be
included. Without the broader term put forth by the usage of “pursuit of happiness” there
would be no way for any kind of future interpretation. When Jefferson switched from
property to happiness he opened the door for a more inclusive kind of right, one which
does not simply protect property but protects any other right which someone might value.
(Coates)
Another place where Locke’s influence can be found is in the Constitution. There
are many places in the Constitution where Locke’s influence can be felt. In chapter nine
of the Second Treatise, Locke describes an executive, legislative and judicial branch. He
writes:
In the Constitution the executive, legislative and judicial branches can be found in Article
I, Article II and Article III. Locke established these separate branches because he did not
trust governments where these different groups are combined. That is also why the
founding fathers established these three separate branches of government but they were
also inspired by Montesquieu, a later Enlightenment philosopher, who developed the idea
of a system of checks and balances to keep one branch from exceeding its powers.
In chapter thirteen of the Second Treatise Locke proposes sessions for congress as
well as a continuous position for the executive. Locke proposed that if those who made
the laws stayed around and did nothing but make laws then that body would become
corrupt. This can be found in the Constitution in Article I, Section 4 where it says that
Congress needs to meet at least once a year but they do not have to make laws year
round(Constitution). The idea of sessions were especially needed in the early republic
when many representatives and senators were only part time politicians because they also
owned crops and needed to go home and tend to them for one half of the year. Today
Some would say Locke’s biggest influence of the American political thought
would be his Letter Concerning Toleration. In his letter Locke states that no religion is
capable of demonstrating its exclusive claim to be the one and true religion. It is wrong
therefore to impose any one religion upon the free consciences of people. People ought to
live in complete tolerance of one another's faiths.(Popple) Locke developed this theory
after the years of religious blood shed that ravaged England because of the hatred
between Protestants and Catholics as well as the horrors in Europe during the Thirty
Years War. Locke and many other philosophers of his time were simply tired of the
8
religious slaughter that was prevalent in Europe. This toleration of other religions finds
its biggest champions in Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. These two would make
their biggest mark on American religious toleration with their two writings to the
Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom and Memorial and Remonstrance Against
and state in Virginia and allowed for a greater amount of religious freedom while
general assessment for the support of teachers of religion. In 1779 Jefferson’s statute was
not passed by the General Assembly. It was not until 1786, while Jefferson was away for
reasons of diplomacy, that it was passed. Jefferson was in Paris lobbying with Ben
Franklin for French assistance against Britain, instead it was Madison who supported the
statute and helped get it passed through the Virginia Commonwealth. Madison also
wrote the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Locke’s religious toleration can clearly
be seen where it states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
documents as the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The founding fathers borrowed the ideas of natural rights, conditions in civil society and
revolution from an oppressive government from John Locke when they wrote the
comprehensive view of rights. Locke’s influence can also be seen in the Constitution
9
with his ideas concerning the establishment of the three branches of government and
sessions, and separation of church and state and religious toleration in the Bill of Rights.
John Locke is one of the biggest influences on American political thought and his ideas
will continue to shape how we as Americans see ourselves and our relationship to our
changed the way that people thought of politics and the terms that they used. By saying
that we as individuals have certain rights and that those rights are beyond any
government or earthly power, Locke laid the philosophical basis for American social and
political thought.
10
Bibliography
Society, <http://www.constitution.org/jl/tolerati.htm>
<http://www.geocities.com/athens/7842/archives/index.html>
<http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/philosophy/john_locke_works.html>
http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html
The Call for Independence: How the Declaration of Independence Came to Be, The
<http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html>